Gaya Pengurusan Konflik Di Kalangan Pentadbir-Pentadbir Sekolah Menengah Daerah Kubang Pasu, Kedah Darul Aman

Gaya Pengurusan Konflik Di Kalangan Pentadbir-Pentadbir Sekolah Menengah Daerah Kubang Pasu, Kedah Darul Aman

The aim of this study was to identify the conflict managemant styles among the school administrators in Kubang Pasu, Kedah. This study was also to investigate conflict management styles, demographic factors, organizational and personality factors. A total of 43 school administrators, 11 of them were...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fathiyah, Abu Bakar
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
eng
Published: 1997
Subjects:
LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/844/1/Fathiyah_Abu_Bakar.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/844/2/1.Fathiyah_Abu_Bakar.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.844
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
topic LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
spellingShingle LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
Fathiyah, Abu Bakar
Gaya Pengurusan Konflik Di Kalangan Pentadbir-Pentadbir Sekolah Menengah Daerah Kubang Pasu, Kedah Darul Aman
description The aim of this study was to identify the conflict managemant styles among the school administrators in Kubang Pasu, Kedah. This study was also to investigate conflict management styles, demographic factors, organizational and personality factors. A total of 43 school administrators, 11 of them were school principals and 32 were senior assistants from 15 of secondary schools. From the 51 questionnaires distributed, only 43 (86%) were usable. The questionaires consisted of 58 items which includes 4 items on demographic factors, 10 items on organizational factors, 14 items on personality types adapted from Myers-Briggs Type indicator (MBTI) and 30 items on conflict management styles adapted from Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument (T-KCMI). Data were analysed using descriptive statistics of frequencies, percentage, means and standard deviation. To determine the relationship between conflict management styles and all factors, means and standard deviation were used. The finding of the study showed that the main conflict management style was to be compromising and avoidance style (mean=3.95). Whereas, the most prefered personality type was Thinking-Feeling (mean=4.15). The result also revealed that there were differences in conflict management styles between gender. Male administrators were more inclined to avoidance style while female were more inclined to compromising style (mean=3.78). There were differences in conflict management styles with regard to age and years of service. This research also found that age factor determines the conflict management styles of the administrators. The administrators aged below 40 (mean=4.33) and the adminstrators aged more than 50 (mean=4.0) have the tendency of using the compromising styles whereas the administrators aged 41-50 (3.97) have the tendency of using the collaborative style. Other than that this research also discovered that hierarchical level determines conflict management styles. The principals have the tendency of using the collaborative style (mean=4.09) whereas the senior assistants are inclined of using two styles which are the collaborative style (mean=3.94) and the avoidance style (mean=3.940. This research also discovered that personality factor and organizational culture do not differentiate the conflict management styles chosen. The population of students in a school differentiates the conflict management styles that are chosen by the school administrators. In schools where the student population is more than 1000, the administrators are inclined of using the collaborative style (mean=3.89). Whereas the administrators in schools with the number of students below 1000 have the tendency of using the compromising style.
format Thesis
qualification_name masters
qualification_level Master's degree
author Fathiyah, Abu Bakar
author_facet Fathiyah, Abu Bakar
author_sort Fathiyah, Abu Bakar
title Gaya Pengurusan Konflik Di Kalangan Pentadbir-Pentadbir Sekolah Menengah Daerah Kubang Pasu, Kedah Darul Aman
title_short Gaya Pengurusan Konflik Di Kalangan Pentadbir-Pentadbir Sekolah Menengah Daerah Kubang Pasu, Kedah Darul Aman
title_full Gaya Pengurusan Konflik Di Kalangan Pentadbir-Pentadbir Sekolah Menengah Daerah Kubang Pasu, Kedah Darul Aman
title_fullStr Gaya Pengurusan Konflik Di Kalangan Pentadbir-Pentadbir Sekolah Menengah Daerah Kubang Pasu, Kedah Darul Aman
title_full_unstemmed Gaya Pengurusan Konflik Di Kalangan Pentadbir-Pentadbir Sekolah Menengah Daerah Kubang Pasu, Kedah Darul Aman
title_sort gaya pengurusan konflik di kalangan pentadbir-pentadbir sekolah menengah daerah kubang pasu, kedah darul aman
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department Sekolah Siswazah
publishDate 1997
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/844/1/Fathiyah_Abu_Bakar.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/844/2/1.Fathiyah_Abu_Bakar.pdf
_version_ 1747827009005813760
spelling my-uum-etd.8442013-07-24T12:09:15Z Gaya Pengurusan Konflik Di Kalangan Pentadbir-Pentadbir Sekolah Menengah Daerah Kubang Pasu, Kedah Darul Aman 1997-04-30 Fathiyah, Abu Bakar Sekolah Siswazah Graduate School LB2801-3095 School administration and organization The aim of this study was to identify the conflict managemant styles among the school administrators in Kubang Pasu, Kedah. This study was also to investigate conflict management styles, demographic factors, organizational and personality factors. A total of 43 school administrators, 11 of them were school principals and 32 were senior assistants from 15 of secondary schools. From the 51 questionnaires distributed, only 43 (86%) were usable. The questionaires consisted of 58 items which includes 4 items on demographic factors, 10 items on organizational factors, 14 items on personality types adapted from Myers-Briggs Type indicator (MBTI) and 30 items on conflict management styles adapted from Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument (T-KCMI). Data were analysed using descriptive statistics of frequencies, percentage, means and standard deviation. To determine the relationship between conflict management styles and all factors, means and standard deviation were used. The finding of the study showed that the main conflict management style was to be compromising and avoidance style (mean=3.95). Whereas, the most prefered personality type was Thinking-Feeling (mean=4.15). The result also revealed that there were differences in conflict management styles between gender. Male administrators were more inclined to avoidance style while female were more inclined to compromising style (mean=3.78). There were differences in conflict management styles with regard to age and years of service. This research also found that age factor determines the conflict management styles of the administrators. The administrators aged below 40 (mean=4.33) and the adminstrators aged more than 50 (mean=4.0) have the tendency of using the compromising styles whereas the administrators aged 41-50 (3.97) have the tendency of using the collaborative style. Other than that this research also discovered that hierarchical level determines conflict management styles. The principals have the tendency of using the collaborative style (mean=4.09) whereas the senior assistants are inclined of using two styles which are the collaborative style (mean=3.94) and the avoidance style (mean=3.940. This research also discovered that personality factor and organizational culture do not differentiate the conflict management styles chosen. The population of students in a school differentiates the conflict management styles that are chosen by the school administrators. In schools where the student population is more than 1000, the administrators are inclined of using the collaborative style (mean=3.89). Whereas the administrators in schools with the number of students below 1000 have the tendency of using the compromising style. 1997-04 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/844/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/844/1/Fathiyah_Abu_Bakar.pdf application/pdf eng validuser https://etd.uum.edu.my/844/2/1.Fathiyah_Abu_Bakar.pdf application/pdf eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Abdul Karim Mohd Nor (1993). Ke arah Kecemerlangan: Implikasi Dari Kajian Sekolah Efektif. Jurnal Pengurusan Pendidikan 3310. Abdul Shukor Abdullah (1994). Penilaian Semula Situasi Pengurusan Sekolah. Jurnal Pengurusan Pendidikan 04:1-8. Ahmad Atory Hussain (1996). Pengurusan Organisasi (Edisi Kedua). Utusan Publications & Distributors Sdn.Bhd. Allport, Floyd Henry (1890). Institutional Behavior, Essays Toward a Re-Interpreting of Contemporary Social Organization. Chapel Hill : The University of North Carolina. Amran Saman (1993). Pengurusan Konflik: Satu Kajian Kes Ke Atas Kakitangan Perbadanan Kemajuan Negeri Selangor. Latihan Ilmiah Sarjana Muda, UKM . Arau, J.D., Morgan, CT’., dan Esbeck, E.B. (1971). Relation of Collaborative In inter personal Relationships to Individual Satisfaction and Organizational Performance. Administrative Science Quarterly 16, 289 - 296. Armstrong, M .and Page,K. (1983). How To Be A Better Manager, Great Britain. Berry, Barbara Powers (1995). An Analysis of the Relationships Between Gender - Role Classification and Interpersonal Conflict Management Styles of Selected Missouri School Administrators. PHD dissertation. Saint Louis University. Blake, R.R. and Mouton, J. S. (1964). The Managerial Grid : Key Orientations for Achieving Production Through People. Gulf Publishing Company, Texas. Blake, R.R. dan Mouton, J.S. (1982). The Versatile Manager : A Grid Profile. Richard D. Irwin Inc., USA,. Bouchard, Thomas J., Jr. (February, l969). Personality, Problem - Solving Procedure, and Performance in Small Groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, Monograph 53 : 1 - 29. Brown, L.D. (1983). Managing Conflict at Organizational Interfaces. Reading, MA : Addison - Wesley. Bruhn, John G. ; Floyd, Chloe S. ; and Bunce, Harver III (June ,1978). Training Effects on Attitude and Personality Characteristics of Nurse Practitioners. Psychological Reports, 42 : 703 - 713. Burke, R.J. (1970) Methods of resolving superior - subordinate conflict : The constructive use of subordinate differences and disagreement. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 5 : 393-411 Center for Applications of Psychological Type (1983). The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Gainesville, FL. Chanin, M. A dan Scheer, J. A. (1984). A Study of the Relationship Between Jungian Personality Dimensions and Conflict - Handling Behavior. Human Relations, 37 (10) : 863 - 879. Cohen, March dan Olsen (1972). A garbage and theory in organizational decision making. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 1-25. Decosta, Jean (1993). Conflict Management and The Learning Organization : A Case Study . Ph.D dissertation. The Fielding of Institute . Dena, Z. M (1995). A Comparison Of Conflict Management Styles Of Hispanic And Anglo Administrations In Elementary And Secondary Schools. University of La Verne. Deutsch, M. (1973). The Resolution of Conflict. New Haven : Yale University Press, Donovan, (1993). Academic Deans and Conflict Management. Ph.D dissertation. University Marquette. Dunham, Randall B (1984). Organizational Behavior : People and Processes in Management. Homewood : Irwin. Earnest, G. W. (1992). Conflict Management Styles as Reflection of Jungian Personality Type Preferences of the Cooperative Extension’s North Central Region Directors and District Directors Ph.D. dissertation, Ohio State University. Encylopedia Dictionary of Organizational Behavior (1995). Edited by Nigel Nicholson ; Oxford, U.K. Everard, B . dan Morris, G. (1990). Management in Education : Effective School Management (2nd ed.). London, Paul Chapman Publishing. Eysenck, H.J. (1962). The Scientific Study of Personality. Routledge and Kegan Ltd., London, 1962. Figueroa, Diane E (1995). Sex and Gender Differences in Interpersonal Conflict Management Behavior in an Academic and Commercial Research Setting. Ph.D. dissertation, Temple Unviiversity. Goldschmid, Marcel L. (August, 1967). Prediction of College Majors by Personality Tests. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 14 : 303 - 308. Gordon, J.R (1991). A Diagnostis Approach to Organizational Behavior. USA Hall, J. (1969). Conflict Management Survey : A Survey of One’s Characteristic Reaction to and Handling of Conflict Between Himself and Others. Conroe, Texas : Teleometrics International. Hall, W.D. (1968). Adolescents in School and Society. London, National Foundation for Educational Research in England and Wales. Hellriegel , D dan Slocum, Jr. (1991). Management (6th Edition). Addison - Wesley Publishing. Henderson, John C. and Nutt, Paul C (April, 1980). The Influence of Decision Style on Decision- Making Behavior. Management Science 26: 371 - 386. Hoy, Frank and Hellriegel, Don (June 1982). The Kilmann and Herden Model of Organizational Effectiveness Criteria for Small Business Managers. Academy of Management Journal 25: 308 - 322. Hoyle, E. (1969). The Role of the Teacher. London : Routledge and Kegan Paul. Hucsynski, Andrzej A. dan Buchanan, David A. (1991). Organizational Behavior (2nd edition). New York : Prentice Hall. Hussein Mahmood (1993). Kepimpinan dan Keberkesanan Sekolah. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, Kuala Lumpur. Invernizzi, J. A. (1988). An Analysis Of Their Operational Relationships of Conflict Management Styles. University of Pittsburgh. Jaafar Muhamad (1996). Kelakuan Organisasi. Kuala Lumpur : Leeds Publications . Johnson, M. L. (1989). Assertiveness and Cooperativeness as Predictors of Interpersonal Conflict Management Behavior, Ph.D. dissertation, Emory University. Jung, C.G (1923). Psychological Types. Translated by H. Godwin Baynes. London : Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd. Jung, C.G. (1923). Psychological Types, Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd., London. Kilmann, R.H. dan Thomas, K.W. (1977). Developing a Forced Choice Measure of Conflict - Handling Behavior : The ”MODE” instrument, Educational and Psychological Measurement 37 : 309 - 325. Kilmann, R.H. dan Thomas, K.W. (1978). Comparison of Four Instrument Measuring Conflict Behavior, Psychological Report 44 : 1139 - 1145. Kilmann, R.H. dan Thomas, K.W. (1975). Interpersonal Conflict - Handling Behavior as a Reflection of Jungian Personality Dimension, Psychological Report 37: 971- 980. Kolb, D dan Putnam, L. (1992). The Multiple Faces of Conflict in Organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior 13 : 311- 324. Kravitz , J. H (1987). Crisis Management : A determination Of Management Style Preferences. University of Pittsburgh. Kreitner, Robert (1992). Management (5th edition). Boston : Houghton Mifflin. Lee, C. (1990). Relative Status of Employees and Styles of Handling Interpersonal Conflict : An Experimental Study With Korean Managers. The International Journal of Conflict Management 1(4) : 327 - 340. Lee, Insuk (1992). An Analysis of Conflict Management Techniques Used by Korean Employees and American Employees Working in Public and Private Organizations In The United States. University of Cornell. Lortie, D.C. (1975). School teacher: A sociological study, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Lowery, P. A. (1993). Principals Organizational Commitment, Role Conflict, and Role Ambiguity as Related to Perceived Conflict Management Styles. University of Pennsylvania. Manimaran a/l Parasuraman (1992). Penyelesaian Konflik Dalam Organisasi, Latihan Ilmiah Sarjana Muda, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Mcintyre, S.E.(1991). Conflict Management by Male and Female Managers as Reported by Self and by Male and Female Subordinates, Ph.D. dissertation, Georgia State University. Miller, Paul VanR (1967). Personality Differences and Student Survival in Law School. Journal of Legal Education 19 : 460 - 467. Mills, Robey dan Smith (1985). Conflict-Handling and Personality Dimension of Project Management Personnel, Psychological Report 57 : 1135 - 1143. Mitroff, Ian I ; Barabba, Vincent P. ; and Kilmann, Ralph H. (Sept,1977). The Application of Behavioral and Philosophical Technologies to Strategic Planning : A Case Study of a Lare Federal Agency. Management Science 24 : 44 - 58. Mohd Majid Konting (1993). Kaedah Penyelidikan Pendidikan , Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, Kuala Lumpur. Mullins, Laurie J. (1993). Management and Organizational Behavior (3rd edition). London : Pitman. Myers & Scott, WR (1983). 0rganization environments: Ritual and rationality. Beverly Hills : Sage. Myers, I. B. (1962). Myers - Briggs Type Indicator, Princeton : Educational Service. Rahim, M.A (1985), Referent Role and Styles of Handling Interpersonal Conflict. Journal of Social psychology. 126 (1), 79-86. Parson, L. C. (1994). An Analysis of Crisis Conflict Resolution Strategies Preferred by Washington State Public High School Principals. University of Gonzaga. Pondy, L. R. (1967). Organizational Conflict : Concepts and Models. Administrative Science Quarterly 12 : 296- 320. Razali Mat Zin, Kepimpinan Dalam Pengurusan . Utusan Publications & Distributions Sdn. Bhd., KL., 1993. Robbins, Stephen P. (1983). Robbins, Stephen P. (1993). Organizational Behavior : Concepts, Controversies, and Application. (6th edition). New York: Prentice-Hall. Robbins, Stephen P. (1984). Management: Concepts and Practices. Englewood Cliffs, New York : Prentice-Hall. Robbins, Stephen P. (1993). Organizational Behavior : Concepts, Controversies, and Application (6th edition). New York : Prentice-Hall. Robbins, S. dan Mukerji, D. (1994). Managing Organizations (2nd Edition). New York : Prentice Hall. Robey , D. (1982). Designing Organizations . Illinois, USA. Ruble, T.L., dan Thomas K.W. (1976) Support for Two - Dimensional Model of Conflict Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, in press. Sabitha & Mahmood Nazar. (1995). Hubungan Manusia Dalam Organisasi. Utusan publications & distributors Sdn. Bhd. Schmidt, W.H. dan Tannenbaum, R. (1960). Management of Differences. Harvard Business Review 10 (3) : 287 - 293. Stoner J. & Wankel. C. (1989). Pengurusan (Edisi ketiga). Amiza Publishing Sdn. Bhd. Petaling Jaya ,Selangor. Utley, M. E., Richardson, D.R. dan Pilkington, C.J. (1989). Personality and Interpersonal Conflict Management. Personality and Individual Differences 10(3) : 287 - 293. Walton, R.E. dan MC Kersie, R.B.(1965). A Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiations : An Analysis of a Social Interaction System. New York : McGraw- Hill. Wan Izuddin, (1991). Strategi Membina Pasukan Berkesan. Nurin Enterprise, Kuala Lumpur. Wejcek, K.E. (1976). Educational organization as loosely coupled system. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21 (1), l-9. Wilson, J. (1989). Bureaucracy. New York : Basic Book Inc. Wirawan, (1992). The relationship between power bases and conflict management styles of Indonesia’s formal leaders, Ph.D. Dissertation, Western Michigan University.

Similar Items