Kompetensi kepimpinan perubahan pengetua dengan efikasi kendiri guru di Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan dan Sekolah Menengah Jenis Kebangsaan di Semenanjung Malaysia
<p>Kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengenal pasti tahap kompetensi kepimpinan perubahan</p><p>pengetua (KKPP) dan efikasi kendiri guru (EKG) di Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan</p><p>(SMK) dan Sekolah Menengah Jenis Kebangasaan (SMJK) di Se...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | thesis |
Language: | zsm |
Published: |
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=10076 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:10076 |
---|---|
record_format |
uketd_dc |
institution |
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
collection |
UPSI Digital Repository |
language |
zsm |
topic |
LB Theory and practice of education |
spellingShingle |
LB Theory and practice of education Liang, Fei Shin Kompetensi kepimpinan perubahan pengetua dengan efikasi kendiri guru di Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan dan Sekolah Menengah Jenis Kebangsaan di Semenanjung Malaysia |
description |
<p>Kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengenal pasti tahap kompetensi kepimpinan perubahan</p><p>pengetua (KKPP) dan efikasi kendiri guru (EKG) di Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan</p><p>(SMK) dan Sekolah Menengah Jenis Kebangasaan (SMJK) di Semenanjung Malaysia.</p><p>Kajian ini juga bertujuan mengenal pasti sama ada terdapat perbezaan yang signifikan</p><p>tahap KKPP dan EKG di SMK dan SMJK. Secara khususnya, kajian ini bertujuan untuk</p><p>mengenal pasti sama ada terdapat hubungan signifikan antara KKPP dengan EKG di</p><p>SMK dan SMJK serta mengenal pasti dimensi-dimensi KKPP yang menyumbang</p><p>kepada EKG. Reka bentuk kajian menggunakan kaedah kuantitatif dengan instrumen</p><p>soal selidik. Sampel kajian melibatkan 383 guru dari SMK dan 357 orang guru dari</p><p>SMJK. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan tahap KKPP di SMK (M=5.04; SP=.56) dan</p><p>SMJK (M=4.86; SP=.78) berada pada tahap kompeten. EKG berada pada tahap tinggi</p><p>iaitu di SMK (M=4.15; SP=.44) dan SMJK (M=4.08; SP=.45). Dapatan kajian</p><p>menunjukkan terdapat perbezaan yang signifikan bagi tahap KKPP di SMK dan SMJK,</p><p>tetapi tidak terdapat perbezaan signifikan bagi tahap EKG mengikut jenis sekolah.</p><p>Dapatan Korelasi Pearson menunjukkan terdapat hubungan positif yang sederhana dan</p><p>signifikan antara KKPP dengan EKG di SMK (r=.366, p<0.01) dan SMJK (r=.376,</p><p>p<0.01). Dapatan analisis regresi berganda menunjukkan dimensi Pembudayaan paling</p><p>menyumbang kepada EKG di SMK pada tahap (R=.155, =.168) dan SMJK pada</p><p>tahap (R=.151, =.209). Manakala dimensi Pembentukan Matlamat hanya</p><p>menyumbang kepada SMK pada tahap (R=.144, =.246). Secara rumusannya, dapatan</p><p>kajian menunjukkan KKPP dapat meningkatkan EKG di SMK dan SMJK. Kajian ini</p><p>membawa implikasi bahawa pihak pengurusan di bawah Kementerian Pendidikan</p><p>Malaysia dan pengetua sekolah dapat mengambil langkah-langkah untuk</p><p>penambahbaikan dimensi-dimensi yang lemah iaitu Pembangunan Kapasiti dan</p><p>Mengurangkan Rintangan dan Konflik agar dapat mempertingkatkan EKG. Selain itu,</p><p>dengan mengetahui hubungan antara KKPP dan EKG, kajian ini dapat dijadikan</p><p>sebagai rujukan bagi membantu pengetua dan guru-guru memahami hubungan</p><p>kompleks antara dua pemboleh ubah tersebut dan membuat persediaan.</p> |
format |
thesis |
qualification_name |
|
qualification_level |
Doctorate |
author |
Liang, Fei Shin |
author_facet |
Liang, Fei Shin |
author_sort |
Liang, Fei Shin |
title |
Kompetensi kepimpinan perubahan pengetua dengan efikasi kendiri guru di Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan dan Sekolah Menengah Jenis Kebangsaan di Semenanjung Malaysia |
title_short |
Kompetensi kepimpinan perubahan pengetua dengan efikasi kendiri guru di Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan dan Sekolah Menengah Jenis Kebangsaan di Semenanjung Malaysia |
title_full |
Kompetensi kepimpinan perubahan pengetua dengan efikasi kendiri guru di Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan dan Sekolah Menengah Jenis Kebangsaan di Semenanjung Malaysia |
title_fullStr |
Kompetensi kepimpinan perubahan pengetua dengan efikasi kendiri guru di Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan dan Sekolah Menengah Jenis Kebangsaan di Semenanjung Malaysia |
title_full_unstemmed |
Kompetensi kepimpinan perubahan pengetua dengan efikasi kendiri guru di Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan dan Sekolah Menengah Jenis Kebangsaan di Semenanjung Malaysia |
title_sort |
kompetensi kepimpinan perubahan pengetua dengan efikasi kendiri guru di sekolah menengah kebangsaan dan sekolah menengah jenis kebangsaan di semenanjung malaysia |
granting_institution |
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
granting_department |
Fakulti Pengurusan dan Ekonomi |
publishDate |
2023 |
url |
https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=10076 |
_version_ |
1804890517945712640 |
spelling |
oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:100762024-04-25 Kompetensi kepimpinan perubahan pengetua dengan efikasi kendiri guru di Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan dan Sekolah Menengah Jenis Kebangsaan di Semenanjung Malaysia 2023 Liang, Fei Shin LB Theory and practice of education <p>Kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengenal pasti tahap kompetensi kepimpinan perubahan</p><p>pengetua (KKPP) dan efikasi kendiri guru (EKG) di Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan</p><p>(SMK) dan Sekolah Menengah Jenis Kebangasaan (SMJK) di Semenanjung Malaysia.</p><p>Kajian ini juga bertujuan mengenal pasti sama ada terdapat perbezaan yang signifikan</p><p>tahap KKPP dan EKG di SMK dan SMJK. Secara khususnya, kajian ini bertujuan untuk</p><p>mengenal pasti sama ada terdapat hubungan signifikan antara KKPP dengan EKG di</p><p>SMK dan SMJK serta mengenal pasti dimensi-dimensi KKPP yang menyumbang</p><p>kepada EKG. Reka bentuk kajian menggunakan kaedah kuantitatif dengan instrumen</p><p>soal selidik. Sampel kajian melibatkan 383 guru dari SMK dan 357 orang guru dari</p><p>SMJK. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan tahap KKPP di SMK (M=5.04; SP=.56) dan</p><p>SMJK (M=4.86; SP=.78) berada pada tahap kompeten. EKG berada pada tahap tinggi</p><p>iaitu di SMK (M=4.15; SP=.44) dan SMJK (M=4.08; SP=.45). Dapatan kajian</p><p>menunjukkan terdapat perbezaan yang signifikan bagi tahap KKPP di SMK dan SMJK,</p><p>tetapi tidak terdapat perbezaan signifikan bagi tahap EKG mengikut jenis sekolah.</p><p>Dapatan Korelasi Pearson menunjukkan terdapat hubungan positif yang sederhana dan</p><p>signifikan antara KKPP dengan EKG di SMK (r=.366, p<0.01) dan SMJK (r=.376,</p><p>p<0.01). Dapatan analisis regresi berganda menunjukkan dimensi Pembudayaan paling</p><p>menyumbang kepada EKG di SMK pada tahap (R=.155, =.168) dan SMJK pada</p><p>tahap (R=.151, =.209). Manakala dimensi Pembentukan Matlamat hanya</p><p>menyumbang kepada SMK pada tahap (R=.144, =.246). Secara rumusannya, dapatan</p><p>kajian menunjukkan KKPP dapat meningkatkan EKG di SMK dan SMJK. Kajian ini</p><p>membawa implikasi bahawa pihak pengurusan di bawah Kementerian Pendidikan</p><p>Malaysia dan pengetua sekolah dapat mengambil langkah-langkah untuk</p><p>penambahbaikan dimensi-dimensi yang lemah iaitu Pembangunan Kapasiti dan</p><p>Mengurangkan Rintangan dan Konflik agar dapat mempertingkatkan EKG. Selain itu,</p><p>dengan mengetahui hubungan antara KKPP dan EKG, kajian ini dapat dijadikan</p><p>sebagai rujukan bagi membantu pengetua dan guru-guru memahami hubungan</p><p>kompleks antara dua pemboleh ubah tersebut dan membuat persediaan.</p> 2023 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=10076 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=10076 text zsm closedAccess Doctoral Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Pengurusan dan Ekonomi <p>Aggestam, L. (2015). Learning organization or knowledge managementWhich came first, the chicken or the egg? Information Technology and Control, 35(3), 295-302.</p><p></p><p>Al-Husseini, S., Elbeltagi, I., (2014). Transformational leadership and innovation: a comparison study between Iraqs public and private higher education. Stud. Higher Educ. 41 (1), 159 181.</p><p></p><p>Almog, O., & Shechtman, Z. (2007). Teachers' democratic and efficacy beliefs and styles of coping with behavioural problems of pupils with special needs. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 22(2), 115129.</p><p></p><p>Amanda G. Mergler & D. Tangen (2010) Using microteaching to enhance teacher efficacy in pre-service teachers, Teaching Education.</p><p></p><p>Anderson, D., & Ackerman-Anderson, L. S. (2001). Beyond change management: Advanced strategies for todays transformational leaders. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.</p><p></p><p>Andoh, H., Ompok, C., & Sukor, N. S. (2021). Hubungan Kelayakan Akademik dan Pengalaman Mengajar dengan Tahap Efikasi Kendiri Guru Prasekolah Menjalankan PDPC Pasca Pandemik Covid-19. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH).</p><p></p><p>Armenakis, A.A. & Harris, S.G. (2002). Crafting a change message to create transformational readiness. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 15(2), 169-183.</p><p></p><p>Arnold, K. A. (2015). Leadership styles, emotion regulation, and burnout. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology (1076-8998), 20 (4), 481-490.</p><p></p><p>Arvey, R. D., Rotundo, M., Johnson, W., Zhang, Z., & McGue, M. (2006). The determinants of leadership role occupancy: Genetic and personality factors. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(1), 1-20.</p><p></p><p>Ashton, P. T. & Webb, R. (1982). Teachers Sense of Efficacy: Toward an Ecological Model. New York: Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.</p><p></p><p>Awanis Mohd, Ainunmadiah Mohd Nawawi & Siti Noor Ismail. (2016). Tahap Efikasi Guru dan Hubungannya dengan Pencapaian Sekolah di Sekolah-Sekolah Menengah Dalam Daerah Bachok. International Seminar on Generating Knowledge Through Research, Universiti Utara Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Azhar Harun, Ramli Basri, Zaidatol Akmaliah & Soaib Asimiran. (2016). Amalan Kepimpinan Guru di Sekolah Menengah Zon Timur Semenanjung Malaysia. Institut Aminuddin Baki dan Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Utara Malaysia. Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan.</p><p></p><p>Babbie, E., 2010. The Practice of Social Research. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage</p><p>Learning.</p><p></p><p>Bakar, A. R., S. Mohamed & N.S. Zakaria. (2012). They Are Trained to Teach, But How Confidence Are They? A Study of Student Teachers Sense of Efficacy. Journal of Social Sciences.</p><p></p><p>Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.</p><p></p><p>Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117-148.</p><p></p><p>Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4) (pp. 7181). New York: Academic Press.</p><p></p><p>Bandura, A. (1996). Self-efficacy in changing societies. New York: Cambridge University Press.</p><p></p><p>Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.</p><p></p><p>Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Personnel Psychology (Vol. 50). New York: Freeman.</p><p></p><p>Bandura, A. (1977a). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Bulletin, 84(2), 191-215.</p><p></p><p>Barber, M. E., and Meyerson, D. (2007), The Gendering of School Leadership: Reconstructing the Principalship, School leadership study: Developing successful principals.</p><p></p><p>Barni, D., Danioni, F., & Benevene, P. (2019). Teachers Self-Efficacy: The Role of Personal Values and Motivations for Teaching. Frontiers in Psychology, 10.</p><p></p><p>Beer, M. and Nohria, N. (2000), Breaking the Code of Change, Harvard Business School Press.</p><p></p><p>Ben Sasson, D., & Somech, A. (2015). Do teachers misbehave? Aggression in school teams. Journal of Educational Administration, 53(6), 755-772.</p><p></p><p>Berman, P., McLaughlin, M., Bass, G., Pauly, E., & Zellman, G. (1977). Federal programs supporting educational change: Vol. VII. Factors affecting implementation and continuation.</p><p></p><p>Bishop, R., & Berryman, M. (2009). The Te Kotahitanga effective teaching profile. Set, 2, 2733.</p><p></p><p>Boak, G., & Coolican, D. (2001). Competencies for retail leadership: Accurate, acceptable, affordable. Leadership and Organizational Development Journal, 22(5), 212220.</p><p></p><p>Bouwmans, M., Runhaar, P., Wesselink, R , Mulder, M. (2017). Towards distributed leadership in vocational education and training school: The interplay between formal leaders and team members.</p><p></p><p>Boyce, J. & Bowers, A. J. (2018).Towards an evolving conceptualization of instructional leadership as leadership for learning: A meta-narrative review of 109 quantitative studies across 25 years. Journal of Educational Administration 56(2).</p><p></p><p>Burgoyne J, Mackness J & Williams S (2009) Baseline study of leadership development in higher education. Final Report, Research & Development Series.</p><p></p><p>Burke, W. W. (2017). Organization change: Theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.</p><p></p><p>Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods (4th Edition ed.): Oxford university press</p><p></p><p>Burrell, D. L. (1994). Relationships among teachers efficacy, teachers locus-of-control, and student achievement (Doctorial dissertation, East Tennessee State University). Retrieved from Electronic Theses and Dissertations. (Paper No. 2646)</p><p></p><p>Burnes, B., & By, R. T. (2012). Leadership and change: The case for greater ethical clarity. Journal of business ethics, 108(2), 239-252.</p><p></p><p>Cameron, K.S., Quinn, R.E., DeGraff, J. and Thakor, A.V. (2006), Competing Values Leadership: Creating Value in Organizations, Elgar, Northampton,MA.</p><p></p><p>Caprara, G., Barbaranelli, C., Steca, P., & Malone, P. (2006). Teachers self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of job satisfaction and students academic achievement: a study at the school level. Journal of School Psychology, 44(2006), 473490.</p><p></p><p>Chao, C. N. G., Chow, W. S. E., Forlin, C., & Ho, F. C. (2017). Improving teachers selfefficacy in applying teaching and learning strategies and classroom management to students with special education needs in Hong Kong. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 360369. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2017.05.004</p><p></p><p>Che Nidzam Che Ahmad, Asmayati Yahya, Mohd Faizal Nizam Lee Abdullah, Noraini Noh, Mazlini Adnan & Nurul Jannah Amri. (2014). Pembinaan dan pengesahan instrumen penilaian persekitaran fizikal bilik darjah sains (IPPFBDS). Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Chen G and Bliese PD (2002) The role of different levels of leadership in predicting self-and collective efficacy: Evidence for discontinuity. Journal of Applied Psychology 87(3): 549556.</p><p></p><p>Cheng, T. F., Tseng, S. F., Wu, H. C. (2019). A Study of Change Leadership Roles for School Principals Based on the Perspectives of Competing Values Framework.</p><p></p><p>Christenson, S. L., A. L. Reschly, and C. Wylie, Eds. 2012. Handbook of Research on Student Engagement. New York: Springer.</p><p></p><p>Christian, S. W. (2018). The Relationship Between Teacher Self-Efficacy and Principal Leadership Behaviors.</p><p></p><p>Christophersen, K. A., Elstad, E., Turmo, A., & Solhaug, T. (2015). Teacher education programs and their contribution to student teacher efficacy in classroom management and pupil engagement. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 60, 240254</p><p></p><p>Chua, Y. P. (2006). Kaedah dan Statistik Penyelidikan: Kaedah Penyelidikan Malaysia: McGraw Hill.</p><p></p><p>Chua, Y. P. (2011). Kaedah dan Statistik Penyelidikan. Selangor McGraw Hill (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.</p><p></p><p>Chua, Y. P. (2012). Mastering Research Methods. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: McGraw Hill.</p><p></p><p>Chua, Y. P. (2013). Mastering research statistics. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Mcgraw-Hill.</p><p></p><p>Chuang, S. F. (2013). Essential skills for leadership effectiveness in diverse workplace development. Online Journal for Workforce Education and Development, 6(1), 123.</p><p></p><p>Chui, M. M. (2016). School conflicts and implications on students performance: A case study of practicing teachers undertaking masters in education and administration at Mount Kenya University</p><p></p><p>Cohen, D., & Ball, D. L. (1990). Relations between policy and practice: A commentary. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(3), 249256.</p><p></p><p>Cohen, J., & Goldhaber, D. (2016). Building a more complete understanding of teacher evaluation using classroom observations. Educational Researcher, 45(6), 378387.</p><p></p><p>Cohen, J. W. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences 2nd Ed. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.</p><p></p><p>Cohen, S., Underwood, L. G., and Gottlieb, B. H. (2000). Social support measurement and intervention: A guide for health and social scientists.</p><p></p><p>Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research Methods In Education (7th Ed) London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.</p><p></p><p>Collie, R. J. (2021). COVID-19 and Teachers Somatic Burden, Stress, and Emotional Exhaustion: Examining the Role of Principal Leadership and Workplace Buoyancy. AERA Open, 7, 233285842098618.</p><p></p><p>Conn, V. S., Algase, D. L, Rawl, S. M., Zerwic, J. J., & Wyman, J. F. (2010). Publishing pilot intervention work. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 32(8) 9941010.</p><p></p><p>Creswell,J. W. (2008). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mix method approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE</p><p></p><p>Creswell,J. W. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mix method approaches (5th ed.). SAGE</p><p></p><p>CTQ, 2006. Where teachers are central to improving schools.</p><p></p><p>Day, C., Gu, Q., & Sammons, P. (2016). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: How successful school leaders use transformational and instructional strategies to make a difference. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52, 221-258.</p><p></p><p>De Jager, P. (2001). Resistance to change: A new view of an old problem. The Futuristic, 35, 24-27.</p><p></p><p>Deemer, S. (2004). Classroom goal orientation in high school classrooms: Revealing links between teacher beliefs and classroom environments. Educational Research, 46(1), 7390.</p><p></p><p>Deloitte & Touche. (1996). Executive survey of manufacturers. Retrieved from http://www. dtcg.co/research</p><p></p><p>Demir, K. (2008). Transformational leadership and collective efficacy: The moderating roles of collaborative culture and teachers self-efficacy. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 33, 93-112.</p><p></p><p>DeVos, G., Buelens, M. & Bouckenooghe, D. (2007). Contribution of content, context and process to understanding openness to organizational change: Two experimental simulation studies. The Journal of Social Psychology, 147(6), 607-630.</p><p></p><p>Dhiren, G., & Andrew, V. (2012). Survey Research Methods, 1233-1238</p><p></p><p>Dian, F. C., Sheng, N. C. & Wen, C. C. (2017). Investigating the major effect of principals change leadership on school teachers professional development.</p><p></p><p>Dicke, T., Marsh, H. W., Parker, P. D., Kunter, M., Schmeck, A., & Leutner, D. (2014). Self-efficacy in classroom management, classroom disturbances, and emotional exhaustion: A moderated mediation analysis of teacher candidates. Journal of Educational Psychology.</p><p></p><p>Dumas, C., & Beinecke, R. H. (2018). Change leadership in the 21st century. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 31(4), 867876.</p><p></p><p>Duyar, I., Gumus, S., and Bellibas, M. S. (2013). Multilevel analysis of teacher work attitudes: The influence of principal leadership and teacher collaboration, International Journal of Educational Management, 27(7): 700-719.</p><p></p><p>Eilers, L., & DAmico M. (2012). Essential leadership elements in implementing common core state standards. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 78(4), 4650. Retrieved from http://www.dkg.org/</p><p></p><p>Ely, D. P. (1999). New perspectives on the implementation of educational technology innovations (ED 427 775, IR 019 432). Laurel, MD: Educational Resource Information Center.</p><p></p><p>Fackler, S., & Malmberg, L. E. (2016). Teachers self-efficacy in 14 OECD countries: Teacher, student group, school and leadership effects. Teaching and Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.03.002</p><p></p><p>Fernandez, S. & Rainey, H.G. (2006). Managing successful organizational change in the public sector. Public Administration Review, 66, 168-176.</p><p></p><p>Fernet, C., Lavigne, G. L., Vallerand, R. J., & Austin, S. (2014). Fired up with passion: Investigating how job autonomy and passion predict burnout at career start in teachers. Work and Stress: An International Journal of Work, Health & Organisations, 28, 270288</p><p></p><p>Ferrell, A. 2012. Classroom Social Environments, Motivational Beliefs, and Student Engagement. Unpublished doctoral diss., University of Southern California. doi:10.1094/PDIS-11-11-0999-PDN.</p><p></p><p>Foltin, A., & Keller, R. (2012). Leading change with emotional intelligence. Nursing Management, 43, 20-25. doi:10.1097/01. NUMA.0000421675.33594.63</p><p></p><p>Ford, J. D., & Ford, L. W. (2012). The leadership of organizational change: A view from recent empirical evidence. In W. Pasmore, R. Woodman & A. Shani (Eds.), Research in organization change and development (pp. 136). Bingley: Emerald Publishing.</p><p></p><p>Fraenkel, J. R. & Wallen, N. E. (2009). How to design and evaluate research in education (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Mcgraw-Hill.</p><p></p><p>Fraenkel, J. R & Wallen N. E (2007). How to Design and Evaluate Reseach in Education (6th). Singapore: McGraw Hill.</p><p>Fredricks, J.A., Blumenfeld, P.C., & Paris, A.H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research 74(1), 59-109. doi: 10.3102/00346543074001059</p><p></p><p>Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces probing the depths of education reform. London: The Falmer Press.</p><p></p><p>Fullan, M. (2000). The return of large-scale reform. Journal of Educational Change, 1, 123.</p><p></p><p>Fullan, M. G., & Watson, N. (2000). School-based management: Reconceptualizing to improve learning outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11, 453-473.</p><p></p><p>Fullan, M., (2007) The new meaning of educational change, Routledge, New York.</p><p></p><p>Garet, M. S., Wayne, A. J., Stancavage, F., Taylor, J., Walters, K., Song, M., & Doolittle, F. (2010). Middle school mathematics professional development impact study: Findings after the first year of implementation (NCEE 2010-4009). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education</p><p></p><p>Gaubatz, J. A., & Ensminger, D. C. (2017). Department chairs as change agents: Leading change in resistant environments. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 45, 141-163. doi:10.1177/1741143215587307</p><p></p><p>Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasisan, P. (2012). Educational Research: Competencies For Analysis And Applications (10th Ed.), Boston: Pearson.</p><p></p><p>Ghasemi, Sh. (2010). The relationship between leadership style (transformational, exchange oriented, participatory) self-employee directors of the National Bank Alborz Province. The first international conference and innovation management.</p><p></p><p>Gibbs, S., & Powell, B. (2012). Teacher efficacy and pupil behaviour: The structure of teachers individual and collective beliefs and their relationship with numbers of pupils excluded from school. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 564584.</p><p></p><p>Gibson, M. (2011, August 9). The 25 most influential business management books. Time.</p><p></p><p>Gibson, S. & Dembo, M. H. (1984). Teacher efficacy: a construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76 (4), 569582.</p><p></p><p>Gilley, A. M. (2005). The manager as change leader. Westport, CT: Praeger.</p><p></p><p>Gokce Ozdemir., Sevilay Sahin., & Necati Ozturk. (2020). Teachers' Self-Efficacy Perceptions in Terms of School Principal's Instructional Leadership Behaviours. International Journal of Progressive Education.</p><p></p><p>Good, T. L., & Brophy, J. E. (2000). Looking in classrooms. New York, NY: Pearson.</p><p></p><p>Greany T (2018) Innovation is possible, its just not easy: Improvement, innovation and legitimacy in Englands autonomous and accountable school system.</p><p></p><p>Griffith-Cooper, B. & King, K. (2007), -The partnership between project management and organisational change: integrating change management with change leadership, Performance Improvement, 46(1), 14-20.</p><p></p><p>Grissom, J. A., Loeb, S., & Master, B. (2013). Effective instructional time use for school leaders: Longitudinal evidence from observations of principals. Educational Researcher, 42(8), 433444. doi:10.3102/0013189X13510020</p><p></p><p>Guerrero, J. M., Teng-Calleja, M., & Hechanova, M. R. M. (2018). Implicit change leadership schemas, perceived effective change management, and teachers commitment to change in secondary schools in the Philippines. Asia Pacific Education Review, 19(3), 375387.</p><p></p><p>Gulistan, M., Athar Hussain, M., & Mushtaq, M. (2017). Relationship between Mathematics Teachers Self Efficacy and Students Academic Achievement at Secondary Level.</p><p></p><p>Guskey, T.R. (1987), Context variables that affect measures of teacher efficacy, Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 81 No. 1, pp. 41-47, available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1987.10885795</p><p></p><p>Guskey, T. R., & Passaro, P. D. (1994). Teacher ef.cacy: a study of construct dimensions. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 627-643. 15.</p><p></p><p>Hair, J. F. Jr., Black,W.C., Babin B. J., & Anderson, R. E., (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). New Jersey: Cengage Learning.</p><p></p><p>Hallinger, P. (2010). Leadership for learning: what we have learned from 30 years of empirical research. Paper presented at the Hong Kong School Principals Conference 2010: Riding the Tide, The Hong Kong Institute: China.</p><p></p><p>Hallinger, P., & Heck, R.H. (1998). Exploring the principals contribution to school effectiveness: 1980-1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(2), 157191.</p><p></p><p>Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. (1999). Next generation methods for the study of leadership and school improvement. In J. Murphy & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (2nd ed., pp. 141162). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.</p><p></p><p>Halpin, P. F., & Kieffer, M. (2015). Describing profiles of instructional practice: A new approach to analyzing classroom observation data. Educational Researcher, 44(5), 263277. doi: 10.3102/0013189X15590804.</p><p></p><p>Hamed Taherdoost, (2016). Validity and Reliability of the Research Instrument; How to test the validation of a Questionnaire/Survey in a research.</p><p></p><p>Hamidah Yusof., Jamal Yunus., Khalip Musa., (2014). Kaedah Penyelidikan Pengurusan Pendidikan. Perak, Malaysia: Penerbit Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.</p><p></p><p>Hamre, B. K., Pianta, R. C., Downer, J. T., & Mashburn, A. (2008). Teachers perceptions of conflict with young students: Looking beyond problem behaviors. Social Development, 17(1), 115136.</p><p></p><p>Hollingworth, L., Olsen, D., Asikin-Garmager, A., & Winn, K. M. (2018). Initiating conversations and opening doors: How principals establish a positive building culture to sustain school improvement efforts. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(6), 1014-1034.</p><p></p><p>Haslam SA, Reicher SD and Platow MJ (2011). The New Psychology of Leadership: Identity, Influence and Power. New York: Psychology Pres.</p><p></p><p>Hamzah Elrehail, Okechukwu Lawrence Emeagwali, Abdallah Alsaad, Amro Alzghoul, (2018). The impact of Transformational and Authentic leadership on innovation in higher education: The contingent role of knowledge sharing, Telematics and Informatics, Volume 35, Issue 1, pp 55-67,</p><p></p><p>Harris, A. (2001). Building the capacity for school improvement. School Leadership & Management, 21, 261-270.</p><p></p><p>Harris, Shah. Abd. Hamid. & Muhammad Karimi Sulaimai. (2018). Analisis Statistik dengan JASP.</p><p></p><p>Hayes, J. (2010). The Theory and Practice of Change Management (3rd edition) (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).</p><p></p><p>Hechanova, M. R. M., Caringal-Go, J. F., & Magsaysay, J. F. (2018). Implicit change leadership, change management, and affective commitment to change. Leadership & Organization Development</p><p></p><p>Herold, D.M., Fedor, D.B., Caldwell, S. & Liu, Y. (2008). The effects of change and transformational leadership on employees commitment to change: A multilevel study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 346-357</p><p></p><p>Hiatt, J. M. (2006). ADKAR: A model for change in business, government and our community. Prosci Learning Center.</p><p></p><p>Hickman, K. L. (2017). A qualitative study on educational leadership styles and teacher morale. Carson-Newman University.</p><p></p><p>Higgs, M. and Rowland, D. (2007), -"All changes great and small: exploring approaches to change and its leadership", Journal of Change Management, 5(2): 121-151.</p><p></p><p>Ho, I. T., & Hau, K. -T. (2004). Australian and Chinese teacher ef.cacy: similarities and differences in personal instruction, discipline, guidance ef.cacy and beliefs in external determinants. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 313-323.</p><p></p><p>Holzberger, D., Philipp, A., & Kunter, M. (2013). How teachers self-efficacy is related to instructional quality: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 774786. doi: 10.1037/a0032198.</p><p></p><p>Holten, A.-L., Hancock, G. R., & Bllingtoft, A. (2019). Studying the importance of change leadership and change management in layoffs, mergers, and closures. Management Decision, 58(3), 393409.</p><p></p><p>Hopkins, D. (2011). Powerful learning: Taking educational reform to scale (Paper No. 20). Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: State Government of Victoria, Department of Education and Early Childhood Education.</p><p></p><p>House, R. J., & Adita, R. N. (1997). The social scientific study of leadership: Quo vadis? Journal of Management, 23, 409 473.</p><p></p><p>Howkins, J. (2001). The creative economy. London: Penguin.</p><p></p><p>Hu, S., and G. D. Kuh. 2001. Being (Dis) Engaged in Educationally Purposeful Activities: The Influences of Student and Institutional Characteristics. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Conference, Seattle, WA, April 1014.</p><p></p><p>Hu, T., & Sung, S. Y. (2004). A trimmed mean approach to finding spatial outliers. Intelligent Data Analysis, 8(1), 7995. doi:10.3233/ida-2004-8105</p><p></p><p>Huang, X., Liu, M., & Shiomi, K. (2007). An Analysis of the Relationship between teachers-efficacy, teachers self-esteem and Orientations to Seeking help. Social behavior and Personality, 35(5), 707-716.</p><p></p><p>Hughes, W. H., & Pickeral, T. (2013). School climate and shared leadership. In Dary, T. & Pickeral, T. (ed) (2013). School Climate Practices for Implementation and Sustainability. A School Climate Practice Brief, Number 1, New York, NY: National School Climate Center.</p><p></p><p>Idi, V. J. A., Victor Gibson Anthony Idi, & Idi, V. J. A. (2017). Hubungan Amalan Komuniti Pembelajaran Profesional (KPP) Dengan Efikasi Kendiri Guru Sekolah Rendah. Jurnal Penyelidikan Pendidikan Guru, 12(9), 124136.</p><p></p><p>Issah, M. (2018). Change Leadership: The Role of Emotional Intelligence. SAGE Open, 8(3), 215824401880091.</p><p></p><p>Jafari, S.A & Yosefnezhad, F. (2002). Compare the performance of high school principals in the Isfahan city, and its relationship to relationship-oriented and taskoriented leadership style, Knowledge and research in psychology, 13-14, 25-38</p><p></p><p>Jensen B., Hunter A., Lambert T. and Clark A. (2015). Aspiring principal preparation, prepared for the Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. Melbourne, Australia: AITSL</p><p></p><p>Jones, V. F., & Jones, L. S. (2012). Comprehensive classroom management, creating communities of support and solving problems (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.</p><p></p><p>Joyce, B., & Calhoun, E. (2010). Models of professional development: A celebration of educators. California: Thousand Oaks.</p><p></p><p>Kanter, R. M., Stein, B. A., & Jick, D. T. (1992). The big three model of change. In The challenge of organizational change: How companies experience it and leaders guide it (pp. 319). New York, NY: Free Press.</p><p></p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2012). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia (PPPM 2013-2025).</p><p></p><p>Keya Rani Das, A. H. M. Rahmatullah Imon (2016). A Brief Review of Tests for Normality. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics. Vol. 5, No. 1, 2016, pp. 5-12. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.12</p><p></p><p>Khezrlou, S., Ellis, R., & Sadeghi, K. (2017). Effects of computer-assisted glosses on EFL learners vocabulary acquisition and reading comprehension in three learning conditions. System, 65, 104116.</p><p></p><p>Khun-Inkeeree, H., Mahmood, M. H. H., Haji-Mohd-Noor, S. S., Kasa, M. D., Yaakob, M. F. M., Omar-Fauzee, M. S., & Sofian, F. N. R. M. (2020). Increasing teachers self-efficacy through regular teaching and learning supervision. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(7), 30023013.</p><p></p><p>Kim, L. E., I. Dar-Nimrod, and C. MacCann. (2018). Teacher Personality and Teacher Effectiveness in Secondary School: Personality Predicts Teacher Support and Student Self-efficacy but Not Academic Achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology 110 (3): 309323. doi:10.1037/edu0000217.</p><p></p><p>Kim, K.R. & Seo, E.H. (2018). The relationship between teacher efficacy and students academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Social Behavior and Personality, 46 (4),529-540. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.6554</p><p></p><p>Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1985). How to manage change effectively: Approaches, methods, and case examples. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.</p><p></p><p>Klassen, R., & Chiu, M. M. (2010). Effects of Teachers Self-Efficacy and Job Satisfaction: Teacher Gender, Years of Experience, and Job Stress. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 741-756. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019237</p><p></p><p>Klassen, R. M., & Tze, V. M. (2014) Teachers self-efficacy, personality, and teaching effectiveness: A metaanalysis. Educational Research Review 12: 5976</p><p></p><p>Klassen, R. M., Tze, V. M. C., Betts, S. M., & Gordon, K. A. (2011). Teacher efficacy research 19982009: Sign of progress of unfulfilled promise? Educational Psychology Review, 23, 2143.</p><p></p><p>Klusmann, U., Richter, D., & Ldtke, O. (2016). Teachers' emotional exhaustion is negatively related to students' achievement: Evidence from a large-scale assessment study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(8), 1193-1203.</p><p></p><p>Korpershoek, H., Harms, T., de Boer, H., van Kuijk, M., & Doolaard, S. (2016). A metaanalysis of the effects of classroom management strategies and classroom management programs on students academic, behavioral, emotional, and motivational outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 86(3), 643681. doi: 10.3102/0034654315626799.</p><p></p><p>Kotler, P. John, dan Heskett, L. James,(1992), Corporate Culture and Performance. New York: Free Press.</p><p></p><p>Kotter, J. P. (1982). The general managers. New York, NY: The Free Press.</p><p></p><p>Kotter, J. P. (1998). Winning at change. Leader to Leader, (10), 2733. Retrieved from http://www.leadertoleaderjournal.com/</p><p></p><p>Kotter, J. P. (1990). A force for change: How leadership differs from management. New York, NY: The Free Press.</p><p></p><p>Kotter, J.P. (1996). Leading change. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.</p><p></p><p>Kotter, J. P. (2006). Leadership versus management: Whats the difference? Qualitative Participation, 29(2), 1317.</p><p></p><p>Kotter, J. P. (2012). Leading change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.</p><p></p><p>Krause, K.-L. 2005. Engaged, Inert or Otherwise Occupied? Deconstructing the Twenty-first Century Undergraduate Student. Paper presented at Symposium, Sharing Scholarship in Learning and Teaching: Engaging Students, James Cook University, Townsville, September.</p><p></p><p>Kruger, M., & Scheerens, J. (2012). Conceptual perspectives on school leadership. In Jaap Scheerens (ed.), School leadership effects revisited: Review and meta-analysis of empirical studies.</p><p></p><p>Kuipers, B.S., M. Higgs, W. Kickert, L. Tummers, J. Grandia and J. Van der Voet. (2014). -The Management of Change in Public Organizations: A Literature Review., Public Administration 92 (1), 1 20.</p><p></p><p>Kunter, M., & Baumert, J. (2006). Who is the expert? Construct and criteria validity of student and teacher ratings of instruction. Learning Environments Research, 9(3), 231251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-006-9015-7.</p><p></p><p>Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D., & Steinbach, R. (1999). Changing leadership for changing times. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.</p><p></p><p>Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2008). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership and Management, 28(1), 27-42.</p><p></p><p>Leithwood, K., A. Harris, and D. Hopkins. 2019. Seven Strong Claims about Successful School Leadership Revisited. School Leadership & Management , 40:1, 5-22.</p><p></p><p>Lewin, K. (1958). Group Decision and Social Change, in G.E. Swanson, T.M. Newcomb & E.L. Hartley (eds), Reading in Social Psychology. New York: Holt,Rhinehart & Winston.</p><p></p><p>Lewin, Kurt. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics. In Cartwright, D. (Ed.), Field Theory in Social Science. London: Social Science Paperbacks.</p><p></p><p>Lim, C. H. (2007). Penyelidikan Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif. Kuala Lumpur: McGrawHill Education.</p><p></p><p>Linda E. Martin & Thalia M. Mulvihill. (2019). Voices in Education: Teacher Self Efficacay in Education. Taylor & Francis Online. 54(3), 195-205.</p><p></p><p>Linda, H., Zamira, H. (2017). The Relationship between Educational Leadership and Teachers' Self-efficacy. The European Journal of Social and Behavioural Sciences. 20(3), 261-273.</p><p></p><p>Lines, R., Selart, M., Espedal, B. & Johansen, S.T. (2005). The production of trust during organizational change. Journal of Change Management, 5(2), 221-245.</p><p></p><p>Louis, K. S., Leithwood, K., Wahlstrom, K. L., Anderson, S. E., Michlin, M., & Mascall, B. Moore, S. (2010). Learning from leadership: Investigating the links to improved student learning. Retrieved from http://www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledge-center/Documents/Investigating the-Links-to Improved-Student-Learning.pdf</p><p></p><p>Luscher, L.S. and Lewis, M.W. (2008), -Organizational change and managerial sensemaking: working through paradox., Academy of Management Journal, 51(2), 221- 240.</p><p></p><p>Mahizer Hamzah, Yusup Hashim, & Ismail Abdul Raoh. (2008). Kajian Tahap Kompetensi Pengetua/Guru Besar Sekolah Terhadap Pengurusan Teknologi Instruksional di Sekolah. 2nd International Malaysian Educational Technology Convention 2008, At Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia, (December 2013), 293402.</p><p></p><p>Mangkau, I. D. (2012). Penguasaan kemahiran komunikasi dalam kalangan pelajar Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM). Paper presented stbthe Prosiding Seminar Pendidikan Pasca Ijazah dalam PTV, Johor Bahru.</p><p></p><p>Mardhiah Johari & Rabiatul-Adawiah (2016). Hubungan kualiti penyeliaan pengajaran dengan efikasi kendiri guru. Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan, Vol. 3, No. 3, 1-15. 2016.</p><p></p><p>Marks, H.M., & Printy, S.M. (2003). Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 370397.</p><p></p><p>Martin, A.J., Jones, E.S., & Callan, V.J. (2006). Status differences in employee adjustment during organizational change. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(2), 145162.</p><p></p><p>Maslowski, & R. (2006). A Review of Inventories for Diagnosing School Culture. Journal of Educational Administration (Vol. 44).</p><p></p><p>Maxwell. Joseph. A. (2012) Qualitative Research Design. SAGE Publications.</p><p></p><p>McKinney, S. (2014). The relationship of child poverty to school education. Improving Schools, 17(3), 203216.</p><p></p><p>McNeill, K. L., Lowenhaupt, R. J. & Singer. R. K. (2017). Instructional leadership in the era of the NGSS: Principals understandings of science practices. Science Education. 2018;122.</p><p></p><p>Mehdinezhad, V. & Mansouri, M. (2016). School Principlals' Leadership Behaviours and its Relation with Teachers' Sense of Self Efficacy. International Journal of Instruction. 9. 51-60. 10.12973/iji.2016.924a.</p><p></p><p>Micceri, T. (1989). The unicorn, the normal curve, and other improbable creatures. The unicorn, the normal curve, and other improbable creatures. Psychological Bulletin, 105(1), 156-166.</p><p></p><p>Midgley, C., Feldlaufer, H., & Eccles, J. (1989). Change in teacher efficacy and student selfand task-related beliefs in mathematics during the transition to junior high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 247258</p><p></p><p>Miles. Matthew. B. and Huberman Michael. () Qualitative Data Analaysis. SAGE Publications.</p><p></p><p>Miller, D. (2010), -Successful change leaders: what makes them? What do they do that is different? Journal of Change Management, 2(4), 359-368.</p><p></p><p>Miller, A. D., Ramirez, E. M., & Murdock, T. B. (2017). The influence of teachers selfefficacy on perceptions: Perceived teacher competence and respect and student effort and achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 64, 260269. doi: 10.1016/ j.tate.2017.02.008.</p><p></p><p>Milner, H. (2002). A case study of an experienced teachers self-efficacy and persistence through crisis situations: Theoretical and practical considerations. The High School Journal, 86, 2835.</p><p></p><p>Mitgang, L. (2012). The making of the principal: Five lessons in leadership training. New York, NY: The WallaceFoundation.</p><p></p><p>Mohammed Sani Ibrahim, Ahmad Zabidi Abdul Razak dan Husaina Banu Kenayathulla. (2015). Strategi Implementasi Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Malaya.</p><p></p><p>Mulholland, B. (2017). 8 critical change management models to evolve and survive. Process.st.</p><p></p><p>Murshidi, R., Konting, M. M., Elias, H., & Fooi, F. S. (2006). Sense of Efficacy Among Beginning Teachers in Sarawak. Teaching Education, 17(3), 265275. doi:10.1080/10476210600849730</p><p></p><p>Nazim, A., Shahid, A., Anjum, A., Wali, R. and Shahid, J. (2014), -Effects of leadership styles on job satisfaction, organizational citizenship behaviour, commitment and turnover intention (empirical study of private sector schools teachers), Journal of Life Science, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 175-183.</p><p></p><p>Nelson, P. M., Reddy, L. A., Dudek, C. M., & Lekwa, A. J. (2017). Observer and student ratings of the class environment: A preliminary investigation of convergence. School Psychology Quarterly, 32(4), 465479. doi: 10.1037/spq0000176 DOI: 10.1037/ spq0000176.</p><p></p><p>Ngien. M. M & Ching. T. H. (2016). Pembelajaran Bahasa Cina di SJKC: Kajian Kes Pelajar Bumiputera di Negeri Sarawak. Journal of Chinese Literature and Culture. Universiti Malaya.</p><p></p><p>Nir, A. E., & Kranot, N. (2006). School principals leadership style and teachers' self efficacy Planning and Changing, 37(3-4), 205-218.</p><p></p><p>Northouse, P. G. (2010). Leadership: Theory and practice (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage</p><p></p><p>Northouse, P.G. (2013), Leadership: Theory and Practice, 6th ed., Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.</p><p></p><p>Novtryananda,G. (2019). Teachers perception of principal leadership on self-efficacy.</p><p></p><p>Nye, J. S. 2008. The Powers to Lead. Oxford: Oxford University Press.</p><p></p><p>Obiwuru, T. C., Okwu, A. T., Akpa, V. O., & Nwankwere, I. A. (2011). Effects of leadership style on organizational performance: A survey of selected small scale enterprises in International Journal of Leadership in Education17 Ikosi-Ketu council development Area of Lagos State, Nigeria. Australian Journal of Business and Management Research, 1(7), 100111.</p><p></p><p>OConner, R., Abedi, J., & Tung, S. (2012). A descriptive analysis of enrollment and achievement among English language learner students in Delaware.</p><p></p><p>OECD. (2011). OECD work on education. Paris: OECD Publishing</p><p></p><p>OECD. (2013). About the OECD. Retrieved 10 July 2013, from http://www.oecd.org/ about/</p><p></p><p>Olga Moutousi & Daniel May (2018) How Change-related Unethical Leadership Triggers Follower Resistance to Change: A Theoretical Account and Conceptual Model, Journal of Change Management, 18:2, 142-161,</p><p></p><p>Olsen, E. (2008). Helping teachers believe! An investigation into the relationship between principal leadership behavior, organizational support, and teacher efficacy belief.(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California.</p><p></p><p>Oreg, S. (2003). Resistance to change: Developing an individual differences measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 680693.</p><p></p><p>Pas, E., Cash, A. H., O Brennan, L., Denham, K. J., & Bradshaw, C. P. (2015). Profiles of classroom behavior in high schools: Associations with teacher behavior management strategies and classroom composition. Journal of School Psychology, 53, 137148. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2014.12.005.</p><p></p><p>Pepper, K. (2010). Effective principals skilfully balance leadership styles to facilitate student success: A focus for the reauthorization of ESAE. Planning & Changing, 41(1/2), 42-56.</p><p></p><p>Petrie, N. (2014). Future trends in leadership development. Colorado Springs: Center for Creative Leadership.</p><p></p><p>Piasta, S. B., Dynia, J. M., Justice, L. M., Pentimonti, J. M., Kaderavek, J. N., & Schatschneider, C. (2010). Impact of professional development on preschool teachers print references during shared read alouds: A latent growth curve analysis. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 3(4), 343380.</p><p></p><p>Polatcan, M., Arslan, P., & Balci, A. (2021). The mediating effect of teacher self-efficacy regarding the relationship between transformational school leadership and teacher agency. Educational Studies, 119.</p><p></p><p>Porter, A., Archbald, D., & Tyree, Jr., A. (1990). Reforming the curriculum: Will empowerment policies replace control? In S. H. Fuhrman & B. Malen (Eds.), The politics of curriculum and testing: The 1990 yearbook of the Politics of Education Association (pp. 1136). New York: Falmer</p><p></p><p>Poulou, M. (2017). An examination of the relationship among teachers perceptions ofsocial-emotional learning, teaching efficacy, teacherstudents interactions and studentsbehavioral difficulties. International Journal of School and Educational Psychology, 5(2),126136.</p><p></p><p>Poulou, M. S., Reddy, L. A., & Dudek, C. M. (2019). Relation of teacher self-efficacy and classroom practices: A preliminary investigation. School Psychology International, 40(1), 2548. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034318798045</p><p></p><p>Radhika kapur. (2018). Educational leadership. University of Delphi.</p><p></p><p>Rafferty, A.E. & Restubog, S.L.D. (2010). The impact of change process and context on change reactions and turnover during a merger. Journal of Management, 36(5), 1309-1338.</p><p></p><p>Rahmah Murshidi, Mohd Majid Konting, Habibah Elias & Foo S.F. (2006). Sense of efficacy among beginning teachers in Sarawak. Teaching Education 17(3): 265-275.</p><p></p><p>Reddy, L. A., Newman, E., & Verdesco, A. (2016). Using self-regulated learning interven-tions and students and teacher formative assessment for youth with ADHD. In T. Cleary(Ed.),Self-regulated learning interventions with at-risk populations: Academic, mentalhealth, and contextual considerations. Washington, DC: American PsychologicalAssociation Press.</p><p></p><p>Robert Dawson (2011) How Significant is a Boxplot Outlier? Journal of Statistics Education, 19(2), 1-13.</p><p></p><p>Roberts, J.L., 2006. Teachers of Secondary Gifted Students. In: The Handbook of Secondary Gifted Education. Dixon, F.A. and S.M. Moon (Eds.), Prufrock, Waco, TX., ISBN-10: 1593631782, pp: 567-580.</p><p></p><p>Ross, J. A. (1992). Teacher efficacy and the effects of coaching on student achievement. Canadian Journal of Education, 17, 5165.</p><p></p><p>Ross, J.A. and Gray, P. (2006), Transformational leadership and teacher commitment to organizational values: the mediating effects of collective teacher efficacy, School Effectiveness and School Improvement, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 179-199, available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450600565795</p><p></p><p>Ross, J. A., Hogaboam-Gray, A., & Hannay, L. (2001). Effects of teacher efficacy on computer skills and computer cognitions of Canadian students in K3. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle.</p><p></p><p>Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80(1), 1-28.</p><p></p><p>Ryan, A.M., Kuusinen, C.M., & Bedoya-Skoog, A. (2015). Managing peer relations: A dimension of teacher self-efficacy that varies between elementary and middle school teachers and is associated with observed classroom quality. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 147156. Crossref.</p><p></p><p>Sa'adiah Shuib, Jamal@Nordin Yunus & Hamidah Yusof. (2020). Pembangunan Profesionalisme Guru Terhadap Efikasi Kendiri Guru Sekolah Menengah di Negeri Selangor. Jurnal Pengurusan dan Kepimpinan Pendidikan. 33(1)2020</p><p></p><p>Sadeghi, K., & Khezrlou, S. (2014). Burnout among English language teachers in Iran: Do socio-demographic characteristics matter? Procedia- Social and Behavioural Sciences, 98, 15901598.</p><p></p><p>Saeed. H, A. & Marwan. M. A. (2019). How Change In Leadership Behaviour</p><p></p><p>Sailors, M., & Price, L. R. (2010). Professional development that supports the teaching of cognitive reading strategy instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 110(3), 301322.</p><p></p><p>Sashkm, M. & Burke, WW. (1990). Understanding and assessing organizational leadership, hi K.E. Clark & M.B. Clark (Eds), Measures of leadership (pp. 297-325). Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership.</p><p></p><p>Sebastian, J., Allensworth, E., & Stevens, D. (2014). The influence of school leadership on classroom participation: Examining configurations of organizational supports. Teachers College Record, 116(8), 136.</p><p></p><p>Segawa, N. (2007). Malaysias 1996 education act: the impact of a multiculturalism-type approach on national integration. Sojourn: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia, 22(1), 3056. http://dx.doi.org/10.1355/SJ22-1B</p><p></p><p>Sehgal, P., Nambudiri, R., & Mishra, S. K. (2017). Teacher effectiveness through self-efficacy, collaboration and principal leadership. International Journal of Educational Management, 31(4), 505517. doi:10.1108/ijem-05-2016-0090</p><p></p><p>Sekaran, U. (2003). Research methods for business. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.</p><p></p><p>Sentocnik, S., Sales, G. C., & Richardson, J. W. (2016). Educational reform in Georgia: Recommendations for building leadership capacity as a critical success factor for instructional change. International Journal of Leadership in Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/13603124.2016.1224931</p><p>Sharma, S., Sun, H.C., Kannan, S. (2012). A comparative analysis on leadership qualities of school principals in China, Malaysia and India. International online journal of educational sciences, 4(3), 536-543.</p><p></p><p>Singh, G.S.B. (2009). The National Professional Qualification for Headship (NPQH) Programme for Secondary School Head Teachers in Malaysia: An Evaluative Case Study. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, University of Birmingham.</p><p></p><p>Singh, T. K. R., & Krishnan, S. K. (2014). Teachers Teaching Practice and Student Achievement in Basic EconomicsA Comparison in Two Types of Schools in Malaysia. International Education Studies, 7(11).</p><p></p><p>Skaalvik EM and Skaalvik S (2010) Teacher self-efficacy and teacher burnout: A study of relations. Teaching and Teacher Education 26(4): 10591069.</p><p></p><p>Smith, I., & Addison, C. (2013). The new school leader: Training instructional leaders for a new generation of teachers and learners. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 17(2), 135140. Retrieved from http://www.alliedacademies.org/academy-of-educational-leadership-journal/</p><p></p><p>Sparks, S. (2013). School climate: Missing link in principal training. Education Week, 32(23), 1-8.</p><p></p><p>Spring, J. 2008. Research on globalization and education. Review of Educational Research 78: 33063.</p><p></p><p>Staggs, J. D. (2002). The relationships among teacher perceptions of principal leadership, teacher efficacy in a school improvement program. Unpublished Manuscript. Ohio State Ohio State University.</p><p></p><p>Steele, N.A., 2010. Three characteristics of effective teachers. Update: Appli. Res. Music Educ., 28: 71- 78. DOI: 10.1177/8755123310361769</p><p></p><p>Tai. M. K. & Omar. A. K. (2013). Principals Change Leadership Competencies: A Study in Malaysian High Performing Secondary School. Journal of Education and Practice. 4(27), 101-116.</p><p></p><p>Tai, M.K., Omar. A. K., Mohamad Sahari & Khuan. W. B. (2014). The development of principal change leadership competency model: a structural equation modelling (SEM) approach. International studies in educational administration, 42 (2), 344.</p><p></p><p>Tai. M. K., Omar. A. K., Mohamad Sahari & Khuan. W. B. (2017).Principle Change Leadership Competencies and Teacher Attitudes Towards Change: The Mediating Effects of Teacher Change Belief. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 21(4), 427-446.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Tai, M. K., Omar, A. K., Mohamad Sahari, N., & Khuan, W. B. (2015). Teacher change beliefs: Validating a scale with structural equation modelling. School Leadership and Management, 35, 266299. doi:10.1080/13632434.2014.962503</p><p></p><p>Theresa.D., Herbert. W. Marsh., Philip D. Parker., Mareike Kunter. (2014). Self-efficacy in classroom management, classroom disturbances, and emotional exhaustion: A moderated mediation analysis of teacher candidates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(2), 569583. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035504.</p><p></p><p>Thoonen EJ, Sleegers PJC, Oort FJ, Peetsma TD and Geijsel F (2011) How to improve teaching practices: The role of teacher motivation, organizational factors, and leadership practices. Educational Administration Quarterly 47(3): 496538.</p><p></p><p>Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, A. W., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202248. https://doi.org/10. 3102/00346543068002202.</p><p></p><p>Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1</p><p></p><p>Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2007). The differential antecedents of selfefficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers. Teaching and teacher Education, 23(6), 944-956</p><p></p><p>Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, A. W., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068002202</p><p></p><p>Van Dam, K., Oreg, S., & Schyns, B. (2008). Daily work contexts and resistance to organizational change: The role of leader-member exchange, perceived development climate, and change process quality Applied Psychology: An International Review, 57, 313-334.</p><p></p><p>Van de Ven, A. H. and M. S. Poole (1995). "Explaining development and change in organizations." Academy of management review 20(3): 510-540.</p><p></p><p>Vieluf, S., Kunter, M., & Van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2013). Teacher self-efficacy in cross-national perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 35, 92-103.</p><p></p><p>Wahlstroom, K. L., & Louis, K. S. (2008). How teachers experience principal leadership: The roles of professional community, trust, efficacy, and shared responsibility. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(4), 458-495.</p><p></p><p>Walker, H.C., Armenakis, A.A. & Berneth, J.B. (2007). Factors influencing organizational change efforts: An integrative investigation of change content, context, process and individual differences. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 20(6), 761-773.</p><p>Walker, M., & Slear, M. (2011). The impact of principal leadership behaviors on the efficacy of new and experienced middle school teachers. NASSP Bulletin, 95(1), 46-64.</p><p></p><p>Walsh, M., Dupr, K., & Arnold, K. A. (2014). Processes through which transformational leaders affect employee psychological health. Journal of Research in Human Resource Management, 28, 162-172.</p><p></p><p>Wan, S. W. Y., Law, E. H. F. & Chan, K. K. (2017). Teachers perception of distributed leadership in Hong Kong primary schools. School Leadership and Management, 38(1), 102-141.</p><p></p><p>Wentworth, D. K., Behson, S. J., & Kelley, C. L. (2018). Implementing a new studen evaluation of teaching system using the Kotter change model. Studies in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1544234</p><p></p><p>Woolfolk, A. E. (1998). Educational Psychology. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.</p><p></p><p>Woolfolk, A. E., & Hoy, W. K. (1990). Prospective teachers sense of efficacy and beliefs about control. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 8191.</p><p></p><p>Wookfolk, A. E., Rosoff, B., & Hoy, W. (1990). Teachers sense of efficacy and their beliefs about managing student. Teaching and Teacher Education, 6(3), 137148.</p><p></p><p>Yap, B. W., & Sim, C. H. (2011). Comparisons of various types of normality tests. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 81(12), 21412155.</p><p></p><p>Yazici, K., Ay, E., Uslu, S., & Arik, S. (2021). The Relationship Between the Lifelong Learning Tendencies and Teacher Self-Efficacy Levels of Social Studies Teacher Candidates. Discourse & Communication for Sustainable Education, 12(1), 6784. https://doi-org.ezpustaka2.upsi.edu.my/10.2478/dcse-2021-0006</p><p></p><p>Yoo, J. H. (2016). The effect of professional development on teacher efficacy and teachers self-analysis of their efficacy change. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1515/jtes-2016-0007</p><p></p><p>Yukl, G. (2006). Leadership in organizations (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson-Prentice Hall.</p><p></p><p>Yusof, R. (2004). Penyelidikan Sains Sosial. Bentong, Pahang : PTS Publication & Distribution.</p><p></p><p>Zaleznik, A. (1977). Managers and leaders: Are They different? Harvard Business Review, 55, 6778.</p><p></p><p>Zee, M., & Koomen, H. M.Y. (2016). Teacher self-efficacy and its effects on classroom processes, student academic adjustment, and teacher well-being: A synthesis of 40 years of research. Review of Educational Research, 86, 981-1015.</p><p></p><p>Zikmund, W. G., Babin, B. J., Carr, J. C., & Griffin, M. (2013). Business research methods (9th ed.). New York: South-Western/Cengage Learning.</p><p></p><p>Zimmerman, B. J., & Cleary, T. J. (2006). Adolescents development of personal agency. The role of selfefficacy beliefs and self-regulatory skills. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p> |