Keberkesanan penggunaan papan putih interaktif dalam Bahasa Inggeris dalam kalangan murid tahun 3

<p>Kajian ini bertujuan untuk melihat keberkesanan penggunaan papan putih</p><p>interaktif dalam Bahasa Inggeris terhadap murid tahun 3 di sebuah sekolah</p><p>rendah Daerah Kinta Selatan, Perak. Objektif kajian adalah untuk menge...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Phan, Chei Wei
Format: thesis
Language:zsm
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=10298
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:10298
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
collection UPSI Digital Repository
language zsm
topic LB Theory and practice of education
spellingShingle LB Theory and practice of education
Phan, Chei Wei
Keberkesanan penggunaan papan putih interaktif dalam Bahasa Inggeris dalam kalangan murid tahun 3
description <p>Kajian ini bertujuan untuk melihat keberkesanan penggunaan papan putih</p><p>interaktif dalam Bahasa Inggeris terhadap murid tahun 3 di sebuah sekolah</p><p>rendah Daerah Kinta Selatan, Perak. Objektif kajian adalah untuk mengenal</p><p>pasti keberkesanan penggunaan papan putih interaktif terhadap tahap</p><p>pencapaian, tahap motivasi dan tahap minat dalam kalangan murid Tahun 3</p><p>dalam mata pelajaran Bahasa Inggeris. Reka bentuk kuasi eksperimen</p><p>digunakan dalam kajian ini. Teori pembelajaran inkuiri dan teori pembelajaran</p><p>konstruktivisme diguna pakai dalam kajian ini. Kajian ini berlangsung selama</p><p>lapan minggu dan terdiri daripada 39 orang responden pelbagai tahap</p><p>pencapaian akademik diagihkan secara rawak ke dalam dua kumpulan, 19</p><p>orang responden bagi kumpulan rawatan (kaedah multimedia interaktif) dan 20</p><p>orang responden bagi kumpulan kawalan (kaedah tradisional). Data dikumpul</p><p>dengan menggunakan ujian pasca pencapaian dan soal selidik bagi tahap</p><p>motivasi dan tahap minat. Perbezaan min ujian pasca pencapaian dan item soal</p><p>selidik dianalisis inferensi dengan menggunakan ujian-t dan data deskriptif. Hasil</p><p>analisis ujian-t mendapati min ujian pasca pencapaian kumpulan rawatan</p><p>(M=18.10) signifikan (p=0.002) lebih tinggi daripada min pencapaian kumpulan</p><p>kawalan (M=13.95). Min soal selidik bagi motivasi kumpulan rawatan (M=2.95)</p><p>signifikan (p=0.031) lebih tinggi daripada min motivasi kumpulan</p><p>kawalan(M=2.67). Min soal selidik bagi minat kumpulan rawatan (M=3.04)</p><p>signifikan (p=0.000) lebih tinggi daripada min minat kumpulan kawalan</p><p>(M=2.48). Kaedah multimedia interaktif adalah lebih berkesan dalam</p><p>meningkatkan tahap pencapaian Bahasa Inggeris, tahap motivasi dan tahap</p><p>minat dalam kalangan murid tahun 3. Kajian berterusan tentang kaedah</p><p>penggunaan papan putih interaktif dalam Bahasa Inggeris perlu dilaksanakan</p><p>agar mendapat bukti yang lebih kukuh dan menyeluruh tentang</p><p>keberkesanannya.</p>
format thesis
qualification_name
qualification_level Master's degree
author Phan, Chei Wei
author_facet Phan, Chei Wei
author_sort Phan, Chei Wei
title Keberkesanan penggunaan papan putih interaktif dalam Bahasa Inggeris dalam kalangan murid tahun 3
title_short Keberkesanan penggunaan papan putih interaktif dalam Bahasa Inggeris dalam kalangan murid tahun 3
title_full Keberkesanan penggunaan papan putih interaktif dalam Bahasa Inggeris dalam kalangan murid tahun 3
title_fullStr Keberkesanan penggunaan papan putih interaktif dalam Bahasa Inggeris dalam kalangan murid tahun 3
title_full_unstemmed Keberkesanan penggunaan papan putih interaktif dalam Bahasa Inggeris dalam kalangan murid tahun 3
title_sort keberkesanan penggunaan papan putih interaktif dalam bahasa inggeris dalam kalangan murid tahun 3
granting_institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
granting_department Fakulti Pembangunan Manusia
publishDate 2023
url https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=10298
_version_ 1804890542685814784
spelling oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:102982024-05-28 Keberkesanan penggunaan papan putih interaktif dalam Bahasa Inggeris dalam kalangan murid tahun 3 2023 Phan, Chei Wei LB Theory and practice of education <p>Kajian ini bertujuan untuk melihat keberkesanan penggunaan papan putih</p><p>interaktif dalam Bahasa Inggeris terhadap murid tahun 3 di sebuah sekolah</p><p>rendah Daerah Kinta Selatan, Perak. Objektif kajian adalah untuk mengenal</p><p>pasti keberkesanan penggunaan papan putih interaktif terhadap tahap</p><p>pencapaian, tahap motivasi dan tahap minat dalam kalangan murid Tahun 3</p><p>dalam mata pelajaran Bahasa Inggeris. Reka bentuk kuasi eksperimen</p><p>digunakan dalam kajian ini. Teori pembelajaran inkuiri dan teori pembelajaran</p><p>konstruktivisme diguna pakai dalam kajian ini. Kajian ini berlangsung selama</p><p>lapan minggu dan terdiri daripada 39 orang responden pelbagai tahap</p><p>pencapaian akademik diagihkan secara rawak ke dalam dua kumpulan, 19</p><p>orang responden bagi kumpulan rawatan (kaedah multimedia interaktif) dan 20</p><p>orang responden bagi kumpulan kawalan (kaedah tradisional). Data dikumpul</p><p>dengan menggunakan ujian pasca pencapaian dan soal selidik bagi tahap</p><p>motivasi dan tahap minat. Perbezaan min ujian pasca pencapaian dan item soal</p><p>selidik dianalisis inferensi dengan menggunakan ujian-t dan data deskriptif. Hasil</p><p>analisis ujian-t mendapati min ujian pasca pencapaian kumpulan rawatan</p><p>(M=18.10) signifikan (p=0.002) lebih tinggi daripada min pencapaian kumpulan</p><p>kawalan (M=13.95). Min soal selidik bagi motivasi kumpulan rawatan (M=2.95)</p><p>signifikan (p=0.031) lebih tinggi daripada min motivasi kumpulan</p><p>kawalan(M=2.67). Min soal selidik bagi minat kumpulan rawatan (M=3.04)</p><p>signifikan (p=0.000) lebih tinggi daripada min minat kumpulan kawalan</p><p>(M=2.48). Kaedah multimedia interaktif adalah lebih berkesan dalam</p><p>meningkatkan tahap pencapaian Bahasa Inggeris, tahap motivasi dan tahap</p><p>minat dalam kalangan murid tahun 3. Kajian berterusan tentang kaedah</p><p>penggunaan papan putih interaktif dalam Bahasa Inggeris perlu dilaksanakan</p><p>agar mendapat bukti yang lebih kukuh dan menyeluruh tentang</p><p>keberkesanannya.</p> 2023 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=10298 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=10298 text zsm closedAccess Masters Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Pembangunan Manusia <p>Sjnvall, J. (2015). Interactive Whiteboards English teachers' integration of the IWB in English Language Teaching. Sweden: Linnaeus University.</p><p>Abdullah, A., Hon Mun, S., Mokhtar, M., Mohamad Ashari, Z., Jumaat, N. F., Ali, D., . . . Abdurrahman, M. (2020). Using Active Learnring with Smart Board to Enhance Primary School Students' Higher Order Thinking Skills in Data Handling. Universal Journal of Educational Reserach, 4421-4432.</p><p>Aktas, S., & Aydin, A. (2016). The Effect of the Smart Board Usage in Science and Technologu Lessons. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 125-138.</p><p>AlAdll, A. M., & Ahmed, A. M. (2019). The effects of using an Electronic Interactive Whiteboard in Developing students" Attitudde, Cognitive Motivation and Academic achievement. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol. 10, No.10.</p><p>Alagesan Ambikapathy, Siti Hajar Halili, & Mohana Dass Ramasamy. (2020). Kemahiran TMK Dalam Kalangan Guru-Guru Bahasa Tamil Sekolah Menengah. Muallim Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 99-114.</p><p>Alhumsi, M. H., & AffendiShabdin, D. (2016). The Feasibility of Incorporating the Interactive Whiteboard in EFL Primary Classrooms. Journal of Business and Social Review in Emerging Economies, 136-142.</p><p>Ambigapathy,P.,Shanthi,B.,&Lim ,J. (2020). Readingthe21stCenturyWorld:Seld-Assessment of Digital Media Literacy Among Secondary School Students in Malaysia. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 350-359.</p><p>Aslina , S. (2020). Students' Computational Thinking Skill through Cooperative Learning Based on Hands-on, Inquiry-based, and Student-centric Learning Approaches. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 290-296.</p><p>Atef, A. (2014). Teachers' Perspectives on Interactive Whiteboards as Instructional Tools in Four Jordanian Schools. Contemporary Educational Technology, 5(1) 73-89.</p><p>Aziz, H. (2016). Ambitious 1BestariNet flawed from the start. Didapatkan dari New Straits Times: https://www.nst.com.my/news/2016/11/187088/ambitious1bestarinet-flawed-start</p><p>Bautista-Vallejo, J., Hernandez-Carrera, R., Moreno-Rodeiguez, R., & Lopez-Bastias,</p><p>J. (2020). Improvement of Memory and Motivation in Language Learning in Primary Education through the Interactive Digital Whiteboard (IDW): The Future in a Post-Pandemic Period. Sustainability, 1-18.</p><p>Bell, M. A. (2002). Why Use an Interactive Whiteboard? A Baker's Dozen Reasons!</p><p>Bell, M. A. (2002, January). Why Use an IWB? A Baker's Dozeb Reasons! Didapatkan dari Teachers.Net: https://www.teachers.net/gazette/JAN02/mabell.html</p><p>Betcher, C., & Lee, M. (2009). The Interactive Whiteboard Revolution. Victoria,Australia: ACER Press.</p><p>Ceren, A., & Armagan, A. (2019). Science Teachers' Beliefs and Attitudes towards the IWB in Education. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 394-414.</p><p>Chang, T. C. (2019). A Study of Taiwanese Elementary School English as a Foreign Language: Teachers' Beliefs, Advantages, and Difficulties of Using Interactive Whiteboards. Asian-Pacific Social Science Review, 87-99.</p><p>Chen, I.-h., Jeffrey, H., Lee, Z., & Fu, Q. (2020). Chen, I.-H., Gamble, J. H., Lee, Z.H., & Fu, Q.-L. (2020). Formative assessment with interactive whiteboards: A one-year longitudinal study of primary students mathematical performance. Computers & Education, 103833. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103833 . Computers & Education, 1-22.</p><p>Chin Nee, C., Melor, M., & Ashairi , S. (2019). ICT: An Effective Platform to Promote Writing Skills among Chinese Primary School Pupils. International Peer Reviewed Journal, 223-237.</p><p>Ching-YIng, L., & Jo-Ting, C. (2018). Effects of English Teacihng with Interactive Whiteboards in the Elementary English Classrooms. Studies in English Language Teaching, 128-138.</p><p>Chirstopoulos, A., Kajasilata, H., Salakoski, T., & Laakso, M.-J. (2020). Limits and Virtues of EducationalTechnology in Elementary SchoolMathematics. Journal of Educational Technology, 59-81.</p><p>Christina, N. (2021). Interactive whiteboards in EFL From the Teachers' and students' perspective. Research Papers in Language Teaching and Learning, 203-219.</p><p>Cole, G. (2012). 101 Senarai Penting untuk Penggunaan ICT di Bilik Darjah. Kuala Lumpur: Institut Terjemahan& Buku Malaysia Berhad.</p><p>Cutrim , S., Shona, & Euline, &. W. (2014). Teaching languages with technology: Communicative approches to interactive whiteboard use. Bloomsbury Academic.</p><p>D.Bruce, D. (2012). Technology in the Mathematics Classroom. What Works? Research into Practice, 1-4.</p><p>Danar, I., Pradipta, E., Yunestia, & Kurnia, W. (2019). The Interactive Whiteboard Promethean Attracts the Interset to Study of Millennial Accounting Students. Social Science, Educational and Humanities Research, 267-271.</p><p>Daniela, D., & Rodrigo, R. (2018). ICT in the classroom: Primary education student teacher' perceptions of the interactive whiteboard during the teaching practicum. Educational and Information Technologies, 1-13.</p><p>DayangJulida,A.,&MuhdIzwan,M. (2021). Minat,TingkahLakuDistruptidDanGaya Pembelajaran Murid Bermasalah Pembelajaran Di Sekolah Rendah. Jurnal Dunia Pendidikan, 49-64.</p><p>De Vita, M., Verschaffel, L., & Jan, E. (2018). Towrds a btter understanding of the potential of interactive whiteboards in stimulating mathematics learning. Learning Environments Research, 81-107.</p><p>okic,, S. (2020). The Use of Technology in Education with the Main Focus on Teaching English as a Foreign Language (EFL): An Overview of Literature. Radical (Dis) Engagement, 119-130.</p><p>Dr Nor, F. (2019, October 19). Challenges in studets' mastery of English. (V. D'Silva, Penemu duga)</p><p>E.S., U., & Jeyanthi, B. (2013). Utility of Interactive Whiteboards in Second Language Classrooms. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications,1-3.</p><p>Farah, Z., & Abu Bakar, R. (2019). Malaysian Rural Secondary School Students' Attitudes towards Learning English as a Second Language. International Journal of Instruction, 1141-1156.</p><p>FrogAsia Sdn Bhd. (2020). FrogVLE. Didapatkan dari frogasia.com: https://frogasia.com/ms/1bestarinet-2/</p><p>Galka, Y. (2019). Interactive Whiteboards and English Teaching. Perspective Directions of Science and Practice, 89-91.</p><p>Ghavifekr,S.,AbdRazak,A.,A.Ghani,M., Ran,N. Y., Meixi,Y.,&Tengyue,Z. (2014). ICT Integration In Education:Incorporation for Teaching & Learning Improvement. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2445.</p><p>Glover, D., Miller, D., Averis, D., & Door, V. (2007). The evolution of an effective pedagogy for teachers using the interactive whiteboard in mathematics and modernlanguages:Anempiricalanalysisfrom the secondarysector. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(1), 5-20.</p><p>Godwin, K., Chibueze, T., & Hyginus, O. (2019). Multimedia Interactive Whiteboard (MIW) System in Technical Drawing in Nigeria: A Perception. Journal of Engineering and Applied Science, 3316-3321.</p><p>Gregorcic, B., Etkina, E., & Planinsic, G. (2017). A NewWay of Using the Interaactive Whiteboard inaHighSchoolPhysicsClassroom:ACase Study. Res Sci Educ.</p><p>Haiza , H., Abdul Halim, M., & Azizah, Z. (2021). The Advantages of Interactive Whiteboard Teachnology in the Development of Children's Learning. Turkish Journal of Computer and mathematics Education, 842-845.</p><p>Hamidiyah, H., Warsono, Anggraini, A., & Jatmika, S. (2020). The Implementation of Whiteboard Animation Video Based on Local Wisdom in Work and Energy Concept to Improve Senior High Schools Students' Learning Interest.</p><p>Proceedings of the 6th International Seminar on Science Education (ISSE 2020) (hlm. 552-556). Yogyakarta: Atlantis Press.</p><p>Harun, H., & Abdullah, M. (2020). Errors in Writing Made by Malaysian Rural Primary School Pupils. Studies in English Language and Education, 438-456.</p><p>Haslinah, A., Norisah, M., & Roziah, A. (2022). Kepuasan Pembelajaran Menggunakan Pendekatan Kerangka Komuniti Inkuiri Pembelajaran dalam Talian di Kalangan Pelajar Guru PDPP di Institut Pendidikan Guru. Global Journal of Education Research & Management, 364-375.</p><p>Hebing, A. (2017). Interactive Whiteboards in the Elementary Classroom:Efficacy and Funding. Honors Senior Theses/Projects, 131.</p><p>Hockly, N. (2013). Mobile Learning. ELT Journal, 80-84.</p><p>Hooper, S., & Rieber, L. (1995). Teaching with Technology. Teaching:Theory into practice, 154-170.</p><p>Iftakhar, S. (2016). Google Classroom:What Works and How? Journal of Education and Social Science, 12-18.</p><p>Jolita,D.,&Romas,P. (2019). InfluenceofuseofActivinspire InteractiveWhiteboards in classroom on students' learning. Digital Education Review, 299-308.</p><p>Joseph, V., & Khan, N. (2020). DigitalLiteracyTools to Enhance English Reading and Writing Skills: A Detailed Literature Review. Global Language Review V(III), 21-33.</p><p>Jupri, B. b., & Siew , N. M. (2022). Kerangka Pemupukan Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Matematik Tambahan. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1-13.</p><p>K.Hewitt, J. (2010). Interactive Whiteboards In The Classroom. UBC Graduate Research, 1-52.</p><p>KARSENTI, T. (2016). The Interactive Whiteboard (IWB): Uses, Benefits and Challenges. A survey of 11683 students and 1131 teachers. Montreal: CRIFPE.</p><p>Karthigesu, K., & Mohamad, M. (2020). Primary School Teachers' Perceptions on the Integration of Interactive Whiteboard (IWB) during Reading Instructions. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 722-741.</p><p>Kaur, T., & AbdulRashid. (2012). Secondary Students' Perspectives on the use of the Interactive Whiteboard for Teaching and Learning of Science in Malaysia. Journal of Education and Practice, 9-14.</p><p>Khor, H., & Noraini, M. (2016). Keberkesanan Penggunaan Papan Putih Interaktid dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Malaysia dalam kalngan murid Tahun3. JPBU Edisi Khas, 11-17.</p><p>Kirbas, A. (2018). The Effect of Interactive Whiteboard Applications Supported by Visual Materials on Middle School Students' Listening Comprehension and Persistence of Learning. Universal Journal of Educational Reserach, 25522561.</p><p>Kohen, Z. (2019). Informed integration of IWB technology, incorporated with exposure to varied mathematics problem-solving skills: its effect on students real-time emotions. International Journal of Mathematical Educaion in Science and Technology, 1-24.</p><p>KPM. (2019). DSKP Bahasa Inggeris SJK Tahun 3.</p><p>KPM. (2019). Executive Summary Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025 (Preschool to Post-Secondary Education). Putra Jaya: KPM.</p><p>KPM. (2019). Laporan Awal Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan 2013-2025. Putrajaya: KPM.</p><p>KPM. (2019). Pelaporan Pentaksiran Sekolah Rendah 2019. KPM.</p><p>KPM. (2019). PPPM 2013-2025.</p><p>Kurniasih, E., & Masduki, L. (2018). Dissemination of Interactive Whiteboard Media in Kindergarden School. Education and Humanities Reserach, 253-255.</p><p>Kutluca, T., Yalman , M., & Tum, A. (2019). Use ofInteractive Whiteboard in Teaching Mathematics forSustainability and itsEffectontheRole of Teacher. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 113-132.</p><p>LengHong,A.,KimHua,T.,&GuangYang,L.(2020).ErrorTypes inMalaysianLower Secondary School Student Writing : A Corpus-Informed Analysis of Subject-Verb Agreement and Copula be. The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 127-140.</p><p>Liudmyla,H.,&Serhii,S. (2017). Using InteractiveWhietboardAtEnglishLessonsFor Law Students. Science and Education, 24-30.</p><p>Maher, D. (2012). Learning in Primary School Classroom using the Interactive Whiteboard.</p><p>Manivannan, P. (2016). 5 Perkara yang perlu Diperbaik dalam Teknologi Pendidikan di Malaysia. Didapatkan dari Astro Awani: http:// www.astroawani.com/beritabisnes/5-perkara-yang-perlu-diperbaik-dalam-teknologi-di-malaysia-102311</p><p>Marjana, B., Dijana, K., & Erika, E. (2018). The Interactive Whiteboaed and Educational Software as an Addition to the Teaching Process. Technical Gazette, 255-262.</p><p>Md Yusoff, D., Mohd Jasmy, A., & Rosyafinah, M. (2019). Relationships between the Usage of ICT, Attitudes, Behavior and Interest towards Achievement in Chemistry among Form Four Students. Scientific Research Publishing, 25742583.</p><p>MD, J., Azu, F., Rorlinda, Noor, F., & Peter. (2021). Exerting Inquiry Based Learning Method in Imporving Gifted Students' Music Recorder Skill. Quantum Journal of Social Science and Hmanities, 11-24.</p><p>Md,N. M.,&Jamaluddin,H.(2019).KemahiranBerfikirKritisMelaluiPermainanDigital Dalam Persekitaran Pembelajaran Konstruktivisme Sosial. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 73-83.</p><p>Mihai, M. (2020). The Use of Interactive Whiteboards in Urban GAUTENG Classrooms. Perspectives in Education, 318-336.</p><p>Mohamed, W., Qoura, A.-S., & Hadidy, M. E. (2019). An Interactive Whiteboard Activities-based Program to Enhance EFL primay learners' Writing skills and Motivation. Journal of Research in Curriculum, Instruction and Educational Technology, 127-148.</p><p>Mohammad HassanBehzadi, & Maryam, M. (2013). Examining CreativitiyofStudents throughSmartBaordinLearning Mathematics. Mathematics Education Trends and Research, 1-7.</p><p>Monther,M.,Norjihan,A.,Liyana,S.,&Ahmed,A.-H.(2019).DevelopmentofaMobile Gma to Boost Students' Motivaion in Learning Englsih Vocabulary. IEEE Access, 13326-13337.</p><p>Mosina, Y. (2019). An Interactive Whiteboard As A Support Tool To A Teacher. Anglistics and Americanistics, (16),88-94.</p><p>Murat,S.,&Yahn,K.T.(2019).TeachingTurkishasForeignLanguagewithInteractive Whiteboards: A Case Study of Multilingual Learners. Technologi Know Learning, 101-115.</p><p>N.S., G., Westrhenen, B.-v., & N., M. (2019). The flipped classroom:supporting a diverse group of students in their learning. Learning Environments Research, 297-310.</p><p>Nadhim,O., &Intan Safinas,M. (2019). IranqiLearners'Problems inLearningSpeech Act of Request in EFL Classroom. Education and Practice, 54-57.</p><p>Ndaru, K., & Pinton, S. (2021). Teori Belajar Konstruktivisme dan Implikasinya dalam Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran. Islamic Education Journal, 49-57.</p><p>Nguyen Ngoc Vu, Le Thanh Truc Phuong, Nguyen Thi Hong Lien, & Nguyen The Luong.(2020).UsingInteractiveWhiteboardforTeachingVocabularyto Young English Learners: Students' Performance and Perceptions. Journal of Critical Reviews, 6651-6657.</p><p>Nguyen, X., & Le Huynh, H. (2020). Motivating Freshmen in Learning Vocabularywith Innovative Interactive Whiteboard Activities. THAITESOL CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS 2020 (hlm. 172-196). BANGKOK: Thailand TESOL Association.</p><p>Noor Hazliezah, T., & Maslawati , M. (2020). Google Classroom for Teaching and Learning in Malaysia Primary School during MCO due to Covid-19. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Publications, 34-37.</p><p>Norliza. (2013). UTHM. Penggunaan mobile learning (m-learning) untuk tujuan pembelajaran dalam kalangan pelajar kejuruteraan UTHM.</p><p>Nurul Atiqah, S., Charanjit Kaur, S., Tarsame Singh, M., & Eng Tek, O. (2021). The Use ofTechnologytoEnhanceEnglish as aSecondLanguage(ESL)Learners Descriptive Writing. Journal of Computer and Mathematics Educations, 961972.</p><p>Oleksandra,B.,& Yana,P. (2019). EducationalGameswithan InteractiveWhiteboard at Professional English Lessons. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 18-37.</p><p>Olga, S. (2019). Exploring Elementary Teachers' Practices with Response to IWBs. International Journal of Teaching, Education and Learning, 130-145.</p><p>Pintrich, R., & DeGroot, E. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 33-40.</p><p>Prudnikovich, M. (2013). The effects of the frequency of the interactive whiteboard's (IWB) manipulation on kindergarten students' achievement in phonemic small group instruction. Master's Theses, Capstones, and Projects, 407.</p><p>Saville, M., Beswick, K., & Callingham, R. (2014). The Use of Interactive Whiteboard Education:Opportunities and Challenges. Dalam M. Saville, K. Beswick, & R. Callingham, The Use of Interactive Whiteboard Education Opportunities and Challenges (hlm. 203-216). Brill | Sense.</p><p>Schiefele,U. &.-P. (1992).Newversionof "Studyinterestquestionnaire".GelbeReihe, Arbeiten zur Empirischen Pdagogik undPdagogischen Psychologie. 21. . 126.</p><p>Schiefele, U., & Krapp, A. (1993). The Study Intereset Questionnaire (SIQ). Diagnostica, 335-351.</p><p>Shaari, A. H., & Randip Kaur Valdev,S. (2019). The analysis of Higher Order Thinking Skills in English reading comprehension testes in Malaysia. Geografia-Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 15(1).</p><p>Singh, C., Tarsame Singh, M., Nadiah, Y., Sasigaran , M., Mohd Rdihuan, I., O.E, T., . . . J.K.S, S. (2020). Rethinking English Language Teaching Through Telegram, Whatapps, Google Classroom and Zoom. Sys Rev Pharm, 45-54.</p><p>Siu, A. (2016, SEPTEMBER 27). A Timeline of Google Classroom's March to Replace Learning Management Systems. Didapatkan dari EdSurge: https://www.edsurge.com/news/2016-09-27-a-timeline-of-google-classroom-smarch-to-replace-learning-managementsystems#:~:text=Google%20Classroom%20launched%20in%20August,and% 20teachers%20were%20using%20it.</p><p>Strelnikova, A. (2019). Motivation in English language learning. Section 1 Contemporary Issues Democratic Society, 266-268.</p><p>Sulaiman,S.,Mohamad,M., AbdulAziz, A.,FarhahKhairuddin,K., Norhainin Mansor, A., & Salwana Alias, B. (2020). 21st Century Reading Strategy Program to Read English Reading material for Primary SchoolPupils. Creative Education, 1289-1298.</p><p>Susanto, Jazeri, M., Hidayat, N., & Arifani, Y. (2020). Does Interactive Whiteboard Affect Student' Writing Proficiency? Asian EFL Journal Articles, 119-142.</p><p>Syazwan Yahaya. (2016, May 17). Teknologi Dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran. Didapatkan dari Academic Edu: https://www.academia.edu/6661517/EDU3105_Teknologi_Dalam_</p><p>Tan, X., & Wan Muna Ruzanna,W. (2019). Integration of 21st Century Learning Skills (4CElements)inInterventionstoImproveEnglishWritingSkillAmong3KClass Students. International Jorunal of Contemporary Education, 100-121.</p><p>Teng, M. F. (2020). Interactive Whiteboard Technology Supported Collaborative Writing: Writing Achievement, Metacognitive Activities, and Co-regulation Patterns. Journal Pre-proof, 3-50.</p><p>Tertemiz, N., Sahin, D., & Duzgun, S. (2015). Views of Primary School Teachers and Students about The Interactive Whiteboard. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1289-1297.</p><p>Truong, M., & Tran, T. (2020). Effect of the Interactive Whiteboard on Vocabulary Achievement, Vocabulary Retention and Learning Attitudes. Anatolian Journal of Education, 173-186.</p><p>Try Gynawan Zebua. (2021). Teori Motivasi Abraham H. Maslow dan Implikasinya dalam Kegiatan Belajar Matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Vol 3, 6876.</p><p>Tsai, C. (2019). A Study of Taiwanese Elementary School English as a Foregin Language: Teachers; Beliefs, Advantages, and Diffiulties of Using Interactive Whiteboards. Asia-Pacific Social Science Review, 88-99.</p><p>Tunaboylu, C., & Demir, E. (2017). The Effect of Teaching Supported by Interactive Whiteboard on Students' Mathematical Achievements in Lower Secondary Education. Journal of Education and Learning, 81-94.</p><p>Walker Tileston, D. (2004). What Every Teacher Should Know About Student Motivation. California: Corwin Prress A Sage Publications Company.</p><p>Waqar, A., & Zuraini, A. (2019). Interactive Whiteboard (IWB) Effectiveness in VocabularyAchievementandMotivation:SuadiEFLLearners'Perceptionsand Insights. Bulletin of Advanced English Studies, 90-103.</p><p>Wenting, C., & Shulin, Y. (2019). Implementing collaborative writing in teacher-centered classroom contexts: student beliefs and perceptions. Language Awareness, 1-21.</p><p>Wulandari, I. (2020). IWB in English Language Class. Journal of Education of English as Foreign Language, 2(2).</p><p>Yaumi, M. (2018). Media dari Teknologi Pembelajaran. Indonesia: Prenadamedia Group.</p><p>Yinghui, S., Changling, P., Harrison, H., & MacLeoad, J. (2018). Examining interactive whiteboard-based instruction on the academic self-efficacy, academic press and achievement of college students. Journal of Open Distance and e-Learning, 115-130.</p><p>Yinghui, S., Zongkai, Y., Harrison, H., & Sanya, L. (2012). The Impact of Interactive Whiteboards on Education.</p><p>Zanariah, H., Peng, C. F., Shaharom, M. N., Ter, T. T., & Raman, K. (2018). The ConceptandUse ofthe VirtualLearningEnvironmentinTeaching:ALiterature Review. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 1293-1301.</p><p></p>