Pembangunan Rubrik Penilaian Pemikiran Kritis dan Penyelesaian Masalah untuk kursus Fizik program Matrikulasi
<p>Kajian ini bertujuan untuk membangunkan Rubrik Penilaian Pemikiran Kritis dan</p><p>Penyelesaian Masalah (CTPS) bagi kursus Fizik program Matrikulasi, Kementerian</p><p>Pendidikan Malaysia (KPM). Reka bentuk kajian yang digunak...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | thesis |
| Language: | zsm |
| Published: |
2023
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=10459 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| id |
oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:10459 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
uketd_dc |
| institution |
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| collection |
UPSI Digital Repository |
| language |
zsm |
| topic |
QC Physics |
| spellingShingle |
QC Physics Alysuliana Alias Pembangunan Rubrik Penilaian Pemikiran Kritis dan Penyelesaian Masalah untuk kursus Fizik program Matrikulasi |
| description |
<p>Kajian ini bertujuan untuk membangunkan Rubrik Penilaian Pemikiran Kritis dan</p><p>Penyelesaian Masalah (CTPS) bagi kursus Fizik program Matrikulasi, Kementerian</p><p>Pendidikan Malaysia (KPM). Reka bentuk kajian yang digunakan ialah kajian</p><p>pembangunan melalui pendekatan kajian gabungan turutan penjelasan. Model instruksi</p><p>ADDIE digunakan sebagai panduan pembangunan rubrik ini. Kutipan data kuantitatif</p><p>dilaksanakan melalui instrumen soal selidik yang melibatkan sampel kajian seramai</p><p>175 orang pensyarah fizik yang dipilih melalui teknik pensampelan rawak mudah.</p><p>Kutipan data kualitatif menerusi temu bual kumpulan berfokus (FGD) pula melibatkan</p><p>seramai tujuh orang pensyarah Fizik Matrikulasi yang dipilih melalui teknik</p><p>pensampelan bertujuan. Data kuantitatif dianalisis berpandukan Model Pengukuran</p><p>Rasch dan disokong dengan data kualitatif yang dianalisis berpandukan Model</p><p>Interaktif Analisis Data Kualitatif Miles dan Huberman. Pembangunan rubrik adalah</p><p>berdasarkan hasil analisis data ini diikuti dengan pemurnian rubrik yang dijalankan</p><p>bersama panel FGD. Pengesahan rubrik adalah berdasarkan persetujuan bersama ahli</p><p>panel. Data kebolehpercayaan rubrik diperoleh daripada tugasan tutorial 20 orang</p><p>pelajar kursus Fizik program Matrikulasi dan dianalisis melalui kebolehpercayaan</p><p>antara penilai menggunakan pekali korelasi intra-kelas (ICC). Hasil kajian</p><p>menunjukkan bahawa nilai peratus persetujuan adalah 100% dan hasil analisis terhadap</p><p>keseluruhan rubrik menunjukkan tahap kebolehpercayaan yang sangat baik dengan</p><p>nilai pekali ICC 0.960. Kesimpulannya, kajian ini menunjukkan rubrik penilaian CTPS</p><p>bagi kursus Fizik program Matrikulasi berjaya dibangunkan dengan kesahan dan</p><p>kebolehpercayaan yang sangat baik. Para pensyarah dapat menggunakan rubrik ini</p><p>sebagai panduan untuk menyusun dan mengukur kemahiran pemikiran kritis dan</p><p>penyelesaian masalah pelajar dengan lebih berkesan. Rubrik ini dapat membantu para</p><p>pensyarah mengenal pasti kekuatan dan kelemahan pelajar dalam aspek tersebut dan</p><p>memberikan saranan yang sesuai untuk peningkatan berterusan prestasi pelajar.</p> |
| format |
thesis |
| qualification_name |
|
| qualification_level |
Master's degree |
| author |
Alysuliana Alias |
| author_facet |
Alysuliana Alias |
| author_sort |
Alysuliana Alias |
| title |
Pembangunan Rubrik Penilaian Pemikiran Kritis dan Penyelesaian Masalah untuk kursus Fizik program Matrikulasi |
| title_short |
Pembangunan Rubrik Penilaian Pemikiran Kritis dan Penyelesaian Masalah untuk kursus Fizik program Matrikulasi |
| title_full |
Pembangunan Rubrik Penilaian Pemikiran Kritis dan Penyelesaian Masalah untuk kursus Fizik program Matrikulasi |
| title_fullStr |
Pembangunan Rubrik Penilaian Pemikiran Kritis dan Penyelesaian Masalah untuk kursus Fizik program Matrikulasi |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Pembangunan Rubrik Penilaian Pemikiran Kritis dan Penyelesaian Masalah untuk kursus Fizik program Matrikulasi |
| title_sort |
pembangunan rubrik penilaian pemikiran kritis dan penyelesaian masalah untuk kursus fizik program matrikulasi |
| granting_institution |
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| granting_department |
Fakulti Sains dan Matematik |
| publishDate |
2023 |
| url |
https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=10459 |
| _version_ |
1804890557693034496 |
| spelling |
oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:104592024-06-20 Pembangunan Rubrik Penilaian Pemikiran Kritis dan Penyelesaian Masalah untuk kursus Fizik program Matrikulasi 2023 Alysuliana Alias QC Physics <p>Kajian ini bertujuan untuk membangunkan Rubrik Penilaian Pemikiran Kritis dan</p><p>Penyelesaian Masalah (CTPS) bagi kursus Fizik program Matrikulasi, Kementerian</p><p>Pendidikan Malaysia (KPM). Reka bentuk kajian yang digunakan ialah kajian</p><p>pembangunan melalui pendekatan kajian gabungan turutan penjelasan. Model instruksi</p><p>ADDIE digunakan sebagai panduan pembangunan rubrik ini. Kutipan data kuantitatif</p><p>dilaksanakan melalui instrumen soal selidik yang melibatkan sampel kajian seramai</p><p>175 orang pensyarah fizik yang dipilih melalui teknik pensampelan rawak mudah.</p><p>Kutipan data kualitatif menerusi temu bual kumpulan berfokus (FGD) pula melibatkan</p><p>seramai tujuh orang pensyarah Fizik Matrikulasi yang dipilih melalui teknik</p><p>pensampelan bertujuan. Data kuantitatif dianalisis berpandukan Model Pengukuran</p><p>Rasch dan disokong dengan data kualitatif yang dianalisis berpandukan Model</p><p>Interaktif Analisis Data Kualitatif Miles dan Huberman. Pembangunan rubrik adalah</p><p>berdasarkan hasil analisis data ini diikuti dengan pemurnian rubrik yang dijalankan</p><p>bersama panel FGD. Pengesahan rubrik adalah berdasarkan persetujuan bersama ahli</p><p>panel. Data kebolehpercayaan rubrik diperoleh daripada tugasan tutorial 20 orang</p><p>pelajar kursus Fizik program Matrikulasi dan dianalisis melalui kebolehpercayaan</p><p>antara penilai menggunakan pekali korelasi intra-kelas (ICC). Hasil kajian</p><p>menunjukkan bahawa nilai peratus persetujuan adalah 100% dan hasil analisis terhadap</p><p>keseluruhan rubrik menunjukkan tahap kebolehpercayaan yang sangat baik dengan</p><p>nilai pekali ICC 0.960. Kesimpulannya, kajian ini menunjukkan rubrik penilaian CTPS</p><p>bagi kursus Fizik program Matrikulasi berjaya dibangunkan dengan kesahan dan</p><p>kebolehpercayaan yang sangat baik. Para pensyarah dapat menggunakan rubrik ini</p><p>sebagai panduan untuk menyusun dan mengukur kemahiran pemikiran kritis dan</p><p>penyelesaian masalah pelajar dengan lebih berkesan. Rubrik ini dapat membantu para</p><p>pensyarah mengenal pasti kekuatan dan kelemahan pelajar dalam aspek tersebut dan</p><p>memberikan saranan yang sesuai untuk peningkatan berterusan prestasi pelajar.</p> 2023 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=10459 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=10459 text zsm closedAccess Masters Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Sains dan Matematik <p>Aang Zainul Abidin, Edi Istiyono, Nunung Fadilah, & Wipsar Sunu Brams Dwandaru. (2019). A computerized adaptive test for measuring the physics critical thinking skills. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 8(3), 376383. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i3.19642</p><p></p><p>Adebisi, N. A., Akanbi, A. O., & Yusuf, A. A. (2020). Difficulty Levels of Senior School Physics Concepts as perceived by students and teachers in Ilorin, Kwara State, Nigeria. Fudma Journal of Education Foundations (FUJEF), 3(2), 1119.</p><p></p><p>Adesoji, F. A. (2018). Bloom Taxonomy Of Educational Objectives And The Modification Of Cognitive Levels. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 5(5), 292297. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.55.4233</p><p></p><p>Afifah Fadhlullah, & Nurbarirah Ahmad. (2017). Thinking outside of the box: Determining students level of critical thinking skills in teaching and learning. Asian Journal of University Education, 13(2), 5170.</p><p></p><p>Ahern, A., Dominguez, C., McNally, C., OSullivan, J. J., & Pedrosa, D. (2019). A literature review of critical thinking in engineering education. Studies in Higher Education, 44(5), 816828. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1586325</p><p></p><p>Ahmad, A., & Awang, M. I. (2016). Pengukuran dan penilaian pendidikan. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.</p><p></p><p>Alsaleh, N. J. (2020). Teaching Critical Thinking Skills: Literature Review. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 19(1), 2139. http://www.tojet.net/articles/v19i1/1913.pdf</p><p></p><p>Annizar, A. ., Masrurotullaily, Jakaria, M. H. ., Mukhlis, M., & Apriyono, F. (2020). Problem solving analysis of rational inequality based on IDEAL model. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1465(012033), 114. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1465/1/012033</p><p></p><p>Aris Hanafi Abu Jalil, Gunathevan Elumalai, & Mohd Izwan Shahri. (2019). Pembinaan rubrik kemahiran insaniah bagi matapelajaran Kokurikulum pelajar program matrikulasi Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Jurnal Penyelidikan Dedikasi, 17, 126145.</p><p></p><p>Asmawati Mohamad Ali, Norizal Abdul Karim@SAB, Anita Mohamed, & NoraihanIsmail. (2018). Aplikasi Gaya Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Aktif dalam Subjek Kemahiran Dinamika bagi Merealisasikan Pendidikan Abad ke-21. Sains Humanika, 10(32), 4755. https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v10n3-2.1487</p><p></p><p>Azieyana Aziz, & Christina Andin. (2018). Penggunaan Strategi Pembelajaran Koperatif untuk Meningkatkan Tahap Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi Pelajar (The Use of Cooperative Learning Strategies to Improve Students Higher Order Thinking Skills). Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 43(01), 19. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/JPEN-2018-43.01-01</p><p></p><p>Azizi Alias, & Kamisah Osman. (2018). Pentaksiran alternatif: Pembinaan dan pelaksanaan rubrik dalam pendidikan Sains. Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Azliza Muhammad. (2019). Pembinaan dan validasi rubrik pentaksiran kendiri kemahiran insaniah, E-PERSONA. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.</p><p></p><p>Azmanirah Ab Rahman, Nurfirdawati Muhamad Hanafi, Anizam Mohamed Yusof, & Halizah Awang. (2019). Analisis Kefungsian Skala Bagi Pembinaan Rubrik Pentaksiran Kompetensi Amali : Analisis Berdasarkan Model Pengukuran Rasch Pelbagai Facet. Online Journal for TVET Practitioners, 4(2), 120126. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30880/ojtp.2019.04.02.015</p><p></p><p>Azmil Hashim, & Nurul Syafiqa Samsudin. (2019). Level of critical thinking skills among students of Tahfiz school. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 8(7S2), 172174.</p><p></p><p>Azrilah Abdul Aziz, Mohd Saidfudin Masodi, & Azami Zaharim. (2015). Asas Model Pengukuran Rasch: Pembentukan Skala & Struktur Pengukuran. Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Bahagian Matrikulasi Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2020). Spesifikasi Kurikulum Fizik, Program Matrikulasi.</p><p></p><p>Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2014). Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi: Aplikasi di Sekolah. In Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>BahagianPembangunanKurikulum. (2013). KBAT: Inisiatif Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi di Sekolah. In Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Baird, A. M., & Parayitam, S. (2019). Employers ratings of importance of skills and competencies college graduates need to get hired Evidence from the New England region of USA. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-12-2018-0250</p><p></p><p>Bakri, F., Putri, A. S. T., & Indrasari, W. (2021). Pocket book based on android: Physics learning practice media in the 21st century. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2320(020010), 17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0037604</p><p></p><p>Bandyopadhyay, S., & Szostek, J. (2019). Thinking critically about critical thinking: Assessing critical thinking of business students using multiple measures. Journal of Education for Business, 94(4), 259270. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2018.1524355</p><p></p><p>Bello, T. ., Opaleye, O. S., & Olatunde, A. N. (2018). Perceived difficult concept in Physics among senior secondary school students in IFE Central Local Goverment Area of Osun State. International Journal of Contemporary Issues in Education (Special Edition), 3, 3041.</p><p></p><p>Bernstein, A. G., & Isaac, C. (2018). Critical thinking criteria for evaluating online discussion. The International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 12(2), 18. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1186069</p><p></p><p>Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch Model : Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.</p><p></p><p>Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2015). Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (3rd ed.). Taylor & Francis.</p><p></p><p>Boughey, S. (2019). Developing rubric to assess 3rd - 5th grade students understanding of science concepts via screencast models. Indiana University, Bloomington.</p><p></p><p>Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 2740.</p><p></p><p>Brookhart, S. M. (2018). Appropriate criteria : Key to effective rubrics. Frontiers in Education, 3(22), 112. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00022</p><p></p><p>Caratozzolo, P., Alvarez-Delgado, A., & Hosseini, S. (2019). Strengthening critical thinking in engineering students. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing, 13(3), 9951012. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-019-00559-6</p><p></p><p>Ceberio, M., Almudi, J. M., & Franco, A. (2016). Design and application of interactive simulations in problem- solving in university-level physics education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25, 590609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9615-7</p><p></p><p>Chan, C. K. Y., & Luk, L. Y. Y. (2020). Development and validation of an instrument measuring undergraduate students perceived holistic competencies. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(3), 467482. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1784392</p><p></p><p>Chan, C. K. Y., Zhao, Y., & Luk, L. Y. Y. (2017). A Validated and Reliable Instrument Investigating Engineering Students Perceptions of Competency in Generic Skills. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(2), 299325. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20165</p><p></p><p>Cousins, B. (2018). Design Thinking: Organizational Learning in VUCA Environments. Academy Ogf Strategic Management Journal, 17(2), 118.</p><p></p><p>Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research approarch. SAGE Publications Inc.</p><p></p><p>Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative adn Mixed Methods Approaches (Fifth). SAGE Publications Inc.</p><p></p><p>DAthifah, & Syafriani. (2019). Analysis of students creative thinking ability in physics learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1185(012116). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1185/1/012116</p><p></p><p>Davies, M. (2015). A Model of Critical Thinking in Higher Education. In Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research (pp. 4192). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12835-1_2</p><p></p><p>Davut Gul, M., & Akcay, H. (2020). Structuring a new socioscientific issues (SSI) based instruction model: Impacts on pre-service science teachers (PSTs) critical thinking skills and dispositions. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 6(1), 141159. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.v6i1.785</p><p></p><p>Dawson, P. (2017). Assessment rubrics : towards clearer and more replicable design , research and practice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(3), 347360. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1111294</p><p></p><p>Demeter, E., Robinson, C., & Frederick, J. G. (2019). Holistically Assessing Critical Thinking and Written Communication Learning Outcomes with Direct and Indirect Measures. Research & Practice in Assessment, 14(Summer 2019), 4151.</p><p></p><p>Desti Ritdamaya, & Andi Suhandi. (2016). Konstruksi Instrumen Tes Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Terkait Materi Suhu dan Kalor. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 2(2), 8796. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21009/1.02212</p><p></p><p>Devedzic, V., Tomic, B., Jovanovic, J., Kelly, M., Dimitrijevic, S., Djuric, D., Sevarac, Z., Devedzic, V., Tomic, B., Jovanovic, J., & Kelly, M. (2018). Applied Measurement in Education Metrics for Students Soft Skills Metrics for Students Soft Skills. Applied Measurement in Education, 31(4), 283296. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2018.1495212</p><p></p><p>Docktor, J. L., Strand, N. E., Mestre, J. P., & Ross, B. H. (2015). Conceptual problem solving in high school physics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 11(2), 113. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.11.020106</p><p></p><p>Dolapcioglu, S., & Doganay, A. (2022). Development of critical thinking in mathematics classes via authentic learning: An action research. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(6), 13631386. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1819573</p><p></p><p>Dumitru, D. (2019). Teachers Thoughts about how critical thinking is a part of their classes. In Communications in Computer and Information Science (Vol. 993). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20954-4_15</p><p></p><p>Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., & Stewart, I. (2014). An integrated critical thinking framework for the 21st century. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 12(June 2014), 4352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.12.004</p><p></p><p>Dwyer, C. P., & Walsh, A. (2020). An exploratory quantitative case study of critical thinking development through adult distance learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 1735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09659-2</p><p></p><p>Dziob, D., Grska, U., Kolodziej, T., & Cepic, M. (2022). Physics competition to inspire learning and improve soft skills: a case of the Chain Experiment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(1), 413446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09620-y</p><p></p><p>Ekahitanond, V. (2013). Promoting university students critical thinking skills through peer feedback activity in an online discussion forum. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 59(2), 247265.</p><p></p><p>Ennis, R. H., & Weir, E. (1985). The Ennis-Weir Critical Thinking Essay Test.</p><p></p><p>Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction. Research Findings and Recommendations.</p><p></p><p>Facione, P. A., & Facione, N. C. (2011). The Holistic Critical Thinking Scoring Rubric. The California Academic Press/ Insight Assessment.</p><p></p><p>Fadillah Ismail, Ahmad Aidil Nasir, Roziana Haron, & Nur Azila Kelewon. (2021). Mendominasi Kemahiran Penyelesaian Masalah Secara Kritis Melalui Penglibatan Mahasiswa Dalam Kokurikulum Bulan Sabit Merah Malaysia. Research in Management of Technology and Business, 2(1), 446455. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30880/rmtb. 2021.02.01.032</p><p></p><p>Faletic, S., & Planinic, G. (2020). How the introduction of self-assessment rubrics helped students and teachers in a project laboratory course. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16(2), 121. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevphyseducres.16.020136</p><p></p><p>Festiyed, D. D. and D. P. (2018). Implementation Authentic Task to Enhance Problem Solving and Self-Management for Physics College Students Implementation Authentic Task to Enhance Problem Solving and Self-Management for Physics College Students. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering PAPER. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/335/1/012068</p><p></p><p>Fukuzawa, S., & DeBraga, M. (2019). Graded response method: does question type influence the assessment of critical thinking? Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 8(1), 110. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v8n1p1</p><p></p><p>Ghazali Darusalam, & Sufean Hussin. (2021). Metodologi penyelidikan dalam pendidikan: Amalan dan analisis kajian. Penerbit Universiti Malaya.</p><p></p><p>Gittinger, F. P., Lemos, M., Neumann, J. L., Frster, J., Dohmen, D., Berke, B., Olmeo, A., Lucas, G., & Jonas, S. M. (2022). Interrater reliability in the assessment of physiotherapy students. BMC Medical Education, 110. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03231-y</p><p></p><p>Habiddin Habiddin, Muhammad Ashar, Achmad Hamdan, & Khaidir R Nasir. (2022). Digital Comic Media for Teaching Secondary School Science. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 16(3), 159166. https://doi.org/10.3991/IJIM.V16I03.28967</p><p></p><p>Hallgren, K. A. (2012). Computing Inter-Rater Reliability for Observational Data: An Overview and Tutorial. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 8(1), 2334. https://doi.org/10.1080/11035896009449194</p><p></p><p>Harahap, D. E., Festiyed, & Djamas, D. (2019). Preliminary study on development of assessment performance instruments on physics learning to improve students critical thinking ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1185(012128), 17. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1185/1/012128</p><p></p><p>Hashimah Md Yusoff, Mohd Isa Hamzah, & Shahlan Surat. (2018). Kesahan dan Kebolehpercayaan Instrumen Indeks Pemupukan Kreativiti dalam Pengajaran Guru dengan Elemen Islam (I-CFTI) Berdasarkan Pendekatan Model Rasch. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 1(1), 7788. https://doi.org/10.17576/jpen-2018-43.03-09</p><p></p><p>Herpiana, R., & Rosidin, U. (2018). Development of instrument for assessing students critical and creative thinking ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 948(012054). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/948/1/012054</p><p></p><p>Huang, B., & Jong, M. S. Y. (2020). Developing a generic rubric for evaluating students work in STEM education. 2020 International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET), 210213. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISET49818.2020.00053</p><p></p><p>Istiyono, E., Dwandaru, W. S. B., Lede, Y. A., Rahayu, F., & Nadapdap, A. (2019). Developing IRT-based physics critical thinking skill test: A CAT to answer 21st century challenge. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 267280. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12417a</p><p></p><p>Jabatan Kepimpinan dan Pembangunan Profesionalisme Institut Pendidikan Guru. (2016). Modul kursus kaedah pengajaran dan pentaksiran elemen kemahiran insaniah Institut Pendidikan Guru Malaysia, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia 2016. Institut Pensisikan Guru Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Jabin Toma, M., & Hafizur Rahman, S. M. (2021). Analogy in secondary physics teaching-learning: Teachers views and practices in Bangladesh. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 20(2), 123.</p><p></p><p>JamaliahJakpar. (2015). Integrasi Kemahiran Berfikir secara Kreatif dan Kritis dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Fizik. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.</p><p></p><p>Jesinta, M. J., & Nurfaradilla, M. N. (2021). Keberkesanan Pendekatan Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran Berasaskan Kemahiran Pemikiran Kritikal Dan Penyelesaian Masalah Serta Kepentingannya Kepada Pelajar Sekolah : Kajian Sistematik. Jurnal Dunia Pendidikan, 3(3), 296307.</p><p></p><p>JK Rubrik iCGPA Politeknik. (2016). Rubrik: Panduan Pentaksiran Domain Hasil Pembelajaran Politeknik.</p><p></p><p>Joanna Bunga Noah, & Azlina Abdul Aziz. (2020). A case study on the development of soft skills among TESL graduates in a University. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(10), 46104617. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081029</p><p></p><p>Jufrida, J., Kurniawan, W., Astalini, A., Darmaji, D., & Kurniawan, D. A. (2019). Students attitude and motivation in mathematical physics. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 8(3), 401408. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i3.20253</p><p></p><p>Kaldaras, L., Yoshida, N. R., & Haudek, K. C. (2022). Rubric development for AI-enabled scoring of three-dimensional constructed-response assessment aligned to NGSS learning progression. Frontiers in Education, 7(November), 115. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.983055</p><p></p><p>KamaruddinIlias, & CheAlehaLadin. (2018). Pengetahuan dan kesediaan Revolusi industri 4.0 dalam kalangan pelajar Institut Pendidikan Guru Kampus Ipoh. The Online Journal of Islamic Education, 6(2), 1826.</p><p></p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025.</p><p></p><p>Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi Malaysia. (2006). Modul pembangunan kemahiran insaniah (soft skills) untuk IPT Malaysia. Universiti Putra Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012</p><p></p><p>Kovacs, I., & Zarandne, K. V. (2022). Digital Marketing Employability Skills in Job Advertisements Must-Have Soft Skills for Entry-Level Workers: a Content Analysis. Economics and Sociology, 15(1), 178192. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2022/15-1/11</p><p></p><p>Kuang, C. Y., Kuen, Y. L., & Shu, F. C. (2017). The development and validation of a mechanical critical thinking scale for high school students. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(5), 13611376. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00675a</p><p></p><p>Kumar, R. (2011). Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginner (third). SAGE Publications Ltd.</p><p></p><p>Kurniawan, D. A., Astalini, & Sari, D. K. (2019). An evaluation analysis of students attitude towards physics learning at senior high school. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 23(1), 2635. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/pep.v23i1.20821</p><p></p><p>Kurniawan, W., Pathoni, H., Muliawati, L., Kurniawan, D. A., Romadona, D. D., Ningsi, A. P., & Dari, R. W. (2020). Relationship of science process skills and critical thinking of students in physics Subject. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(11), 55815588. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081162</p><p></p><p>Larsson, K. (2021). Using Essay Responses as a Basis for Teaching Critical Thinkinga Variation Theory Approach. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 65(1), 2135. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2019.1650824</p><p></p><p>Leach, S., Immekus, J. C., French, B. F., & Hand, B. (2020). The factorial validity of the Cornell critical thinking tests: a multi-analytic approach. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37(September 2020), 100676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100676</p><p></p><p>Lee, M. F., Sohod, S. N. M., & Ab Rahman, A. (2019). Exploring the mastery level of critical thinking and problem solving skill among the technical undergraduate. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 11(3), 914. https://doi.org/10.30880/jtet.2019.11.03.002</p><p></p><p>Lertyosbordin, C., Maneewan, S., Yampinij, S., & Thamwipat, K. (2019). Scoring rubric of problem-solving on computing science learning. International Education Studies, 12(8), 2632. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v12n8p26</p><p></p><p>Lilia Ellany Mohtar. (2019). Model sumbangan kreativiti, sikap, efikasi kendiri dan motivasi terhadap pencapaian Fizik pelajar tingkatan empat. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Linacre, J. M. (2009). A Users Guide to Winsteps Ministep Rasch-Model Computer Programs.</p><p></p><p>Low, D., & Pandya, J. Z. (2019). Issues of validity, subjectivity, and reflexivity in multimodal literacy research and analysis. Journal of Language and Literacy Education, 15(1), 122.</p><p></p><p>Lynch, M., Sage, T., Hitchcock, L. I., & Sage, M. (2021). A heutagogical approach for the assessment of Internet Communication Technology (ICT) assignments in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(55), 116. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00290-x</p><p></p><p>Mabruroh, F., & Suhandi, A. (2017). Construction Of Critical Thinking Skills Test Instrument Related The Concept On Sound Wave. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 812(012056), 16. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/812/1/012056</p><p></p><p>Machado, C. T., & Carvalho, A. A. (2020). Concept Mapping: Benefits and Challenges in Higher Education. Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 68(1), 3853. https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2020.1712579</p><p></p><p>Madu, B. C., Ogundeji, O. M., & Okoye, N. E. (2020). Scientific Explanation of Phenomenon, Imagination and Concept Formation as Correlates of Students Understanding of Physics Concepts. Journal of Natural Sciences Research, 11(16), 1728.</p><p></p><p>Mahamad Yusof Abdul Rani. (2017). Pembinaan Modul Pentaksiran Kemahiran Insaniah Melalui Kokurikulum Di Kolej Matrikulasi. In Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.</p><p></p><p>Mahbubah, K., Rusdiana, D., Juanda, E. A., Hermita, N., & Hakim, I. R. (2018). Constructing secondary students critical thinking skill test on heat concept. International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education, 3, 221226.</p><p></p><p>Malm, J., Collins, J., Nel, C., Smith, L., Carey, W., Miller, H., Khagram, K., & Zaccagnini, M. (2022). Transferable Skills Gained by Student Leaders in International SI-PASS Programs. The International Journal of Learning in Higher Education, 29(1), 114. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-7955/CGP/v29i01/65-82</p><p></p><p>Marini Kasim, Mohd Faiz Mohd Yaakob, & Faizahani Ab Rahman. (2020). Enhancing Decision Making Skills among Postgraduate Students Using Alternative Assessment Approach. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(11), 56705675. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081171</p><p></p><p>Martin-Kniep, G. O., & Shubert, R. (2017). Learning thats made to measure. Learning Professional, 38(2), 3842.</p><p></p><p>Mary R. Lynn. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382386. http://ijoh.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ijoh/article/view/26</p><p></p><p>Masila Alias, Aidah Abdul Karim, & Zanaton Iksan. (2019). Kesahan dan Kebolehpercayaan Instrumen Kemahiran Menyelesaikan Masalah untuk Murid Sekolah Menengah Berdasarkan Model Pengukuran Rasch. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 44(1), 319.</p><p></p><p>Mertler, C. A. (2001). Designing Scoring Rubrics for Your Classroom. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(25).</p><p></p><p>Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.</p><p></p><p>Mitrevski, B. (2019). Teaching critical thinking and problem solving in physics. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2075(February). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5091398</p><p></p><p>Mohamad, M. M., Masek, A., Yunos, J. M., Alias, M., Hamdan, N. H., & Rahma Putra, A. B. N. (2020). Assessing heutagogical elements in learning of engineering education: Instrument validation. Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems, 5(5), 245252. https://doi.org/10.25046/AJ050530</p><p></p><p>Mohammadi, M., & Kamali, J. (2020). Designing scoring rubrics for different writing tasks: The case of resume writing in Iran. In The Assessment of L2 Written English across the MENA Region: A Synthesis of Practice (pp. 171193).</p><p></p><p>Mohd Asri Harun, Zulkifley Hamid, & Wahab, K. A. (2016). Melahirkan warga yang berketerampilan bahasa: Kajian hubungan antara pengetahuan dengan amalan komunikatif dalam kalangan guru Bahasa Melayu. Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 12(9), 3245.</p><p></p><p>Mohd Hasril Amiruddin, Wan Norehan Wan Mamat, & Reyan Healme Rohanai. (2018). Tahap Penguasaan Kemahiran Kritis Dalam Kalangan pelajar Kejuruteraan dan Hubungannya Dengan Pencapaian Pelajar. Online Journal for TVET Practitioners, 3(2).</p><p></p><p>Mohd Nazri Abdul Rahman, Nordin Abd. Razak, Nasrul Anuar Abd Razak, Haireen Abdul Hadi, & Muhammad Asyraf Mansor. (2020). Instrumen pentaksiran prestasi standard awal perkembangan kreativiti dan estetika kanak-kanak Malaysia: Konsensus Pakar. Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 7(4), 2029. http://umrefjournal.um.edu.my/filebank/published_article/6255/Template 4.pdf</p><p></p><p>Mohd Nur Hafiz Fauzi. (2017). Kerangka kompetensi kemahiran teknikal dalam kalangan pelajar Kejuruteraan Elektrik di Politeknik ke arah memenuhi keperluan industri. Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Mohd Syaubari Othman. (2021). Strategi pembelajaran berasaskan perbincangan menerusi konteks pengintegrasian kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi dalam mata pelajaran Pendidikan Islam di negeri Perak. Selangor Humaniora Review, 4(1), 233250. https://share.journals.unisel.edu.my/ojs/index.php/share/article/view/123</p><p></p><p>Moneva, J. C., Miralles, R. G., & Rosell, J. Z. (2020). Problem Solving Attitude and Critical Thinking Ability of Students. International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH, 8(1), 138149. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v8.i1.2020.261</p><p></p><p>More, S. S., & Kadam, D. M. (2023). Effectiveness of Think Aloud Pair Problem Solving and Case Study based Active Learning Techniques for Engineering Classroom. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 36(Special issue), 419424. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2023/v36is2/23063</p><p></p><p>Mueller, J. F., Taylor, H. K., Brakke, K., Drysdale, M., Kelly, K., Levine, G. M., & Ronquillo-Adachi, J. (2020). Assessment of Scientific Inquiry and Critical Thinking: Measuring APA Goal 2 Student Learning Outcomes. Teaching of Psychology, 47(4), 274284. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628320945114</p><p></p><p>Muhammad Zulazizi Mohd Nawi. (2022). Falsafah dan Kurikulum Pendidikan Islam Abu Hamid Al-Ghazali. Journal of Technical and Vocational Education (JTVE), 7(2), 1324. http://upikpolimas.edu.my/ojs/</p><p></p><p>Nadia Abdul Rahim, Nor Aqilah Meor Fadzir, Nur Adilah Hani Zaimal, Firli Fairulyzan Arias Yahaya, Zatul Iffah Zainol, & Mohd Razimi Husin. (2021). Implikasi Gaya Pembelajaran Koperatif Subjek Sains Bagi Murid Tahap Dua di Sekolah Kebangsaan Bandar Baru Rawang. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(2), 5766. https://doi.org/10.36079/lamintang.jhass-0302.238</p><p></p><p>Nakkaew, N., & Adunyarittigun, D. (2019). An Initial Development of an Analytic Rubric for Assessing Critical Thinking in English Argumentative Essays of EFL College Students. REFLections, 26(2), 5174.</p><p></p><p>Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (Seventh). Pearson Education Limited.</p><p></p><p>Ngajie, B. N., Li, Y., Tiruneh, D. T., & Cheng, M. (2020). Investigating the effects of a systematic and model-based design of computer-supported argument visualization on critical thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100742</p><p></p><p>Nicholas Walliman. (2011). Research methods: The basics. Routledge Taylor & Farncis Group.</p><p></p><p>Nini Afriana, Halim, A., & Muhammad Syukri. (2021). Analysis of the Characteristics of Students Critical Thinking Skills in Completing National Exam Questions. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(2), 196201. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7i2.627</p><p></p><p>Nonis, S. A., & Hudson, G. I. (2018). Developing and assessing critical thinking skills in marketing students : The power of making explicit problem-solving processes. Journal of Education for Business, 94(3), 195203. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2018.1504737</p><p></p><p>Noone, C., Bunting, B., & Hogan, M. J. (2016). Does mindfulness enhance critical thinking? Evidence for the mediating effects of executive functioning in the relationship between mindfulness and critical thinking. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(JAN), 2043. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02043</p><p>Nor Hazizah Julaihi, & Aniza Hamdan. (2019). Malaysian secondary school teachers readiness in implementing 21st century learning (PAK21). 1st International Conference on Education in the Digital Ecosystem (ICEdDE 2019), 320331.</p><p></p><p>Norzalina Noor. (2018). Pembangunan dan validasi rubrik sebagai alat pengukuran penulisan ilmiah pelajar Ijazah Sarjana Muda. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.</p><p></p><p>Nur Farah Suaidah Osman, & Mohd Isa Hamzah. (2020). Teori Pembelajaran dan Elemen Kemahiran Insaniah. Proceeding of the International Conference of Future Education and Advances 2020, 378383. https://www.masree.info/icofea-2020/</p><p></p><p>Nur Farhana Ramli. (2019). Development and validation of an instrumen to measure science teachers instructional preparedness in STEM implemetation. Universiti Putra Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Nur Halimah, & Adiyono. (2022). Unsur Unsur Penting dalam Penilaian. Educational Journal: General and Spesific Research, 2(1), 160167.</p><p></p><p>Nurfirdawati Muhamad Hanafi. (2016). Pembangunan dan penentusahan rubrik pentaksiran prestasi bagi mentaksir projek rekabentuk seni bina di politeknik Malaysia. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.</p><p></p><p>Nurhafizah Abdul Musid. (2019). Pembinaan rubrik pentaksiran On Job Training (Organisasi) Diploma Teknologi Pembinaan, Kolej Vokasional di Malaysia. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Nurul Shida, Abdul Halim Abdullah, Sharifah OSman, & Norulhuda Ismail. (2023). Design and development of critical thinking learning strategy in integral calculus. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 12(1), 284291. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i1.23779</p><p></p><p>Nurul Shida Noni, & Abdul Halim Abdullah. (2018). Assessing critical thinking skills in polytechnic. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 118(24). https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.B1132.0982S919</p><p></p><p>Nussbaum, M., Barahona, C., Rodriguez, F., Guentulle, V., Lopez, F., Vazquez-Uscanga, E., & Cabezas, V. (2020). Taking critical thinking, creativity and grit online. Educational Technology Research and Development, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09867-1</p><p></p><p>Nyeneng, I. D. P., Suyanto, E., Andra, D., & Elokanita, H. N. (2022). Measuring Critical Thinking Skills with Online Instrument in Circular Motion Concept. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 10(1), 1323. https://doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v10i1.11185</p><p></p><p>Nyumba, T. O., Wilson, K., Derrick, C. J., & Mukherjee, N. (2018). The use of focus group discussion methodology : Insights from two decades of application in conservation. Mothods in Ecology and Evolution, 9, 2032. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12860</p><p></p><p>Olesen, K. B., Christensen, M. K., & ONeill, L. D. (2020). What do we mean by transferable skills? A literature review of how the concept is conceptualized in undergraduate health sciences education. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning. https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-01-2020-0012</p><p></p><p>Omar, D. (2018). Focus group discussion in built environment qualitative research practice. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 117(012050), 18. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/117/1/012050</p><p></p><p>Ong, A. L., Chang, P. K., & ArinaAnisAzlan. (2020). Penerokaan Isu Penguasaan Kemahiran Insaniah Graduan UKM dari perspektif STOPS. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 36(3), 247265. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2020-3603-15</p><p></p><p>Pasukan Pemikir Pendidikan Abad Ke-21. (2017). Panduan Pelaksanaan Pendidikan Abad Ke -21. In Institut Aminuddin Baki Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Perinetti, G. (2018). StaTips Part IV: Selection, interpretation and reporting of the intraclass correlation coefficient. South European Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Research, 5(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.5937/sejodr5-17434</p><p></p><p>Poce, A., Agrusti, F., & Re, M. R. (2017). Use of webcasting and development of critical thinking skills. 882890.</p><p></p><p>Poce, A., Medio, C. De, Amenduni, F., & Re, M. R. (2019). Critical thinking assessment : A first approach to the automatic evaluation. 18th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET), 331338.</p><p></p><p>Polit, D. F., Beck, T., & Owen, S. V. (2007). Focus on Research Methods Is the CVI an Acceptable Indicator of Content Validity? Appraisal and Recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 30(4), 459467. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20199</p><p></p><p>Polya, G. (1945). How to Solve It: A New Aspect of Mathematical Method. Princeton University Press.</p><p></p><p>Popham, W. J. (1997). Whats Wrong - and Whats Right - with Rubrics. Educational Leadership, 55(2), 7275.</p><p></p><p>Possin, K. (2013). Some Problems with the Halpern Critical Thinking Assessment (HCTA) Test. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, 28(3), 412. https://doi.org/10.5840/inquiryct201328313</p><p></p><p>Prayogi, S., Muhali, Yuliyanti, S., Asary, M., Azmi, I., & Verawati, N. N. S. P. (2019). The effect of presenting anomalous data on improving students critical thinking ability. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(6), 133137. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i06.9717</p><p></p><p>Priyaadharshini, M., & Sundaram, B. V. (2018). Evaluation of higher-order thinking skills using learning style in an undergraduate engineering in flipped classroom. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 26(6), 22372254. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22035</p><p></p><p>Priyatni, E. T., & Martutik. (2020). The Development of a CriticalCreative Reading Assessment Based on Problem Solving. SAGE Open, 10(2), 19. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020923350</p><p></p><p>Puspitasari, E., Novianti, R., & N, Z. (2022). Pengembangan Sistem Penilaian Pembelajaran PAUD melalui Aplikasi SAKA. Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 6(3), 13461356. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v6i3.1726</p><p></p><p>Putri, F. S., & Istiyono, E. (2017). The Development of Performance Assessment of Stem-Based Critical Thinking Skill in the High School Physics Lessons. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 12(5), 12691281.</p><p></p><p>Ramrez-Montoya, M. S., Loaiza-Aguirre, M. I., Ziga-Ojeda, A., & Portuguez-Castro, M. (2021). Characterization of the teaching profile within the framework of education 4.0. Future Internet, 13(4), 117. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi13040091</p><p></p><p>Rathakrishnan, M., Ahmad, R., & Choo, L. S. (2017). Online discussion : Enhancing students critical thinking skills. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1891(1), 020120.</p><p></p><p>Re, M. R., Amenduni, F., Medio, C. De, & Valente, M. (2019). How to use assessment data collected through writing activities to identify participants critical thinking levels. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 15(3), 117132. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1135051</p><p></p><p>Rear, D. (2019). One size fits all? The limitations of standardised assessment in critical thinking. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(5), 664675. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1526255</p><p></p><p>Reddy, M. V. B., & Panacharoensawad, B. (2017). Students Problem-Solving Difficulties and Implications in Physics : An Empirical Study on Influencing Factors. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(14), 5962.</p><p></p><p>Reinhard, A., Felleson, A., Turner, P. C., & Green, M. (2022). Assessing the impact of metacognitive postreflection exercises on problem-solving skillfulness. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 18(010109), 110. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.18.010109</p><p></p><p>Reynders, G., Lantz, J., Ruder, S. M., Stanford, C. L., & Cole, R. S. (2020). Rubrics to assess critical thinking and information processing in undergraduate STEM courses. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(9), 115. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00208-5</p><p></p><p>Rhodes, T. (2010). Assessing outcome and improving achievement: Tips and tools for using rubrics. Association of American Colleges and Universities.</p><p></p><p>Rohana Amin. (2015). Pembangunan dan pengesahan Instrumen Ujian Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi bagi tajuk Daya dan Gerakan. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.</p><p></p><p>Ruwiyah, S., Rahman, N. F. A., Rahim, A. R. A., Yusof, M. Y., & Umar, S. H. (2021). Cultivating science process skills among physics students using PhET simulation in teaching. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2126(012007), 19. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2126/1/012007</p><p></p><p>Shaizatul Azreen Rodzalan, Maisarah Mohamed Saat, & Lily Suriani Mohd Arif. (2018). Critical Thinking and Problem Solving Skill Development: A Study in Malaysian Public Universities. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3.35), 272275.</p><p></p><p>Sharif, M. Z., Lee, M. F., & Ab Rahman, A. (2021). Critical thinking and problem solving skills comprehension level among vocational education undergraduates. Studies of Applied Economics, 39(10), 18. https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v39i10.5627</p><p></p><p>Sholihah, T. M., & Lastariwati, B. (2020). Problem based learning to increase competence of critical thinking and problem solving. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 14(1), 148154. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v14i1.13772</p><p></p><p>Silva, H., Lopes, J., & Dominguez, C. (2018). Enhancing college students critical thinking skills in cooperative groups. International Conference on Technology and Innovation in Learning, Teaching and Education, 181192. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20954-4_13</p><p></p><p>Silverman, D. (2014). Interpreting qualitative data. SAGE Publications Ltd.</p><p></p><p>Simper, N. (2018). Rubric authoring tool for supporting the development and assessment of cognitive skills in higher education. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 6(1), 1024. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.6.1.3</p><p></p><p>Siti Kausar Zakaria, & Mohd Noor Daud. (2020). Kemahiran Insaniah pelajar IPTA merentas jantina. International Journal of Education and Pedagogy (IJEAP), 2(4), 1638. http://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/ijeap/article/view/11420/5456</p><p></p><p>Sujov, E., Cierna, H., Simanov, L., Gejdo, P., & tefkov, J. (2021). Soft skills integration into business processes based on the requirements of employersapproach for sustainable education. Sustainability, 13(13807), 113. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413807</p><p></p><p>Sulastri, M. R., Ardhuha, J., & Zuhdi, M. (2021). The development of learning media and critical thinking skill instrument based on 5E learning cycle model on harmonic vibration material. Jurnal Pijar MIPA, 16(4), 466472. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v16i4.2847</p><p></p><p>Sumarni, W., Supardi, K. I., & Widiarti, N. (2018). Development of assessment instruments to measure critical thinking skills. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 349(012066), 111. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/349/1/012066</p><p></p><p>Sutarno, S. (2019). The development and validation of critical thinking skills test on photoelectric effect for pre-service physics teachers. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(032032), 16. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/3/032032</p><p></p><p>Syahara, M. U., & Astutik, E. P. (2021). Analisis Berpikir Kreatif Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah SPLDV ditinjau dari Kemampuan Matematika. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 201212. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v10i2.892</p><p></p><p>Tadele, K., & Sitotaw, B. (2018). Perception and trends in assessment of students learning in Physics courses. Latin-American Journal of Physics Education, 12(1), 13071315. https://doi.org/10.17576/jpen-2018-43.02-09</p><p></p><p>Tangkin, W. P. (2019). Pemanfaatan rubrik sebagai instrumen penilaian alternatif. Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 9(1), 2939. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24246/j.js.2019.v9.i1.p29-39</p><p></p><p>Thompson, M. K., Clemmensen, L. H., & Ahn, B. U. (2013). Effect of rubric rating scale on the evaluation of engineering design projects. International Journal of Engineering Education, 29(6), 14901502.</p><p></p><p>Tiruneh, D. T., Cock, M. De, Weldeslassie, A. G., Elen, J., & Janssen, R. (2017). Measuring critical thinking in physics : Development and validation of a critical thinking test in electricity and magnetism. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(4), 663682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9723-0</p><p></p><p>Tiruneh, D. T., Weldeslassie, A. G., Kassa, A., Tefera, Z., Cock, M., & Elen, J. (2016). Systematic design of a learning environment for domain- specific and domain-general critical thinking skills. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(3), 481505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9417-2</p><p></p><p>Uvathi Mariappan, Arsaythamby Veloo, & Kanageswari Suppiah Shanmugam. (2018). Pembinaan dan pengesahan instrumen kemahiran insaniah bagi subjek perakaunan di matrikulasi. Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 6(4), 2939.</p><p></p><p>Vaezi, M., & Rezaei, S. (2019). Development of a rubric for evaluating creative writing: a multi-phase research. New Writing, 16(3), 303317.</p><p></p><p>Van Eeuwijk, P., & Zuzanna, A. (2017). How to Conduct a Focus Group Discussion (FGD). Methodological Manual (Issue April). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-150640</p><p></p><p>Verawati, N. N. S. P., Prayogi, S., Gummah, S., Muliadi, A., & Yusup, M. Y. (2019). The effect of conflict-cognitive strategy in inquiry learning towards pre-service teachers critical thinking ability. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(4), 529537. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i4.21002</p><p></p><p>Vignal, M., & Wilcox, B. R. (2022). Investigating unprompted and prompted diagrams generated by physics majors during problem solving. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 18(010104), 119. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.18.010104</p><p></p><p>Vinoothini, M., & Nor Azwahanum, N. S. (2023). Kesahan dan Kebolehpercayaan Instrumen Mengenai Pengetahuan , Sikap dan Cabaran Guru dalam Pelaksanaan Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 8(1), 112.</p><p></p><p>Waluyo, A. A., Hartono, & Sulhadi. (2021). Critical thinking skills assessment instrument in physics subjects: How to develop a four tier diagnostic test? Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1918(022011), 16. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1918/2/022011</p><p></p><p>Watson, G., & Glaser, E. (1980). Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal Test.</p><p></p><p>Wechsler, S. M., Saiz, C., Rivas, S. F., Vendramini, C. M. M., Almeida, L. S., Mundim, M. C., & Franco, A. (2018). Creative and critical thinking: Independent or overlapping components? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 27(1), 114122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.12.003</p><p></p><p>Weiner, I. B., & Craighead, W. E. (2010). The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology. In John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (2nd ed.).</p><p></p><p>Wren, D., & Cashwell, A. (2018). Mission Possible: Measuring Critical Thinking and Problem Solving. Educational Leadership, 75(5), 7075.</p><p></p><p>Xu, E., Wang, W., & Wang, Q. (2023). The effectiveness of collaborative problem solving in promoting students critical thinking: A meta-analysis based on empirical literature. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 111. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01508-1</p><p></p><p>Yamanishi, H., Ono, M., & Hijikata, Y. (2019). Developing a scoring rubric for L2 summary writing: a hybrid approach combining analytic and holistic assessment. Language Testing in Asia, 9(13), 122. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-019-0087-6</p><p></p><p>Yuznaili Saleh. (2021). Panduan komprehensif penyelidikan: Navigasi penyelidikan anda. Global Mediastreet Sdn Bhd.</p><p></p><p>Yuznaili Salleh. (2016). Pembangunan Ujian Diagnostik Kemahiran Menulis Mekanis Bahasa Melayu. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.</p><p></p><p>Zainab Ab Rahman, Hoon, T. S., & Sidhu, G. K. (2019). Using the peer socratic questioning (PSQ) technique to develop critical thinking skills in group discussion. Jurnal Penyelidikan Tempawan, XXXVI, 91103.</p><p></p><p>ZainudinAwang. (2015). Postgraduate research proposal: a step by step guide in writing proposal for postgraduate students (1st ed.). MPWS Rich Publication Sdn Bhd.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p> |