Permodelan hubungan antara kekuatan sistem, faktor pengguna dan gaya pengurusan sekolah dengan kejayaan penggunaan aplikasi sistem maklumat pengurusan pendidikan

Kajian ini adalah satu usaha yang dijalankan untuk mengetahui sejauh mana tahappenggunaan Pengurusan Sistem Maklumat Pendidikan (EMIS) di sekolah seluruh NegeriPerak Darul Ridzuan. Dalam penyelidikan ini, kejayaan penggunaan EMIS dilihat dari segi manfaatkepada individu dan organisasi. Reka bentuk p...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Mohd Faizal Md Karim
Format:	thesis
Language:	zsm
Published:	2018
Subjects:	LB2361 Curriculum
Online Access:	https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=3
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:3
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
collection	UPSI Digital Repository
language	zsm
topic	LB2361 Curriculum
spellingShingle	LB2361 Curriculum Mohd Faizal Md Karim Permodelan hubungan antara kekuatan sistem, faktor pengguna dan gaya pengurusan sekolah dengan kejayaan penggunaan aplikasi sistem maklumat pengurusan pendidikan
description	Kajian ini adalah satu usaha yang dijalankan untuk mengetahui sejauh mana tahappenggunaan Pengurusan Sistem Maklumat Pendidikan (EMIS) di sekolah seluruh NegeriPerak Darul Ridzuan. Dalam penyelidikan ini, kejayaan penggunaan EMIS dilihat dari segi manfaatkepada individu dan organisasi. Reka bentuk penyelidikan ini adalah korelasi- deskriptif dan datakuantitatif dikumpul dengan menggunakan soal selidik. Penyelidikan ini menggunakan teknikpensampelan rawak strata untuk memilih 607 responden. Data kajian dianalisis dengan menggunakananalisis deskriptif dan analisis regrasi berganda. Kajian ini mendapati empat daripada enam faktoriaitu Kepuasan Pengguna EMIS (β = .45), Penglibatan Pengguna EMIS (β = .25), Kekuatan Sistem EMIS(β= .24), Kefahaman Pengguna EMIS (β = .20) adalah faktor penyumbang yang signifikan kepadakejayaan penggunaan EMIS dan menghasilkan persamaan regresi (Y-hatK-EMIS = -0.19 + 0.24(KekuatanSistem (KS)) + 0.20(Kefahaman Pengguna (KP)) + 0.25(Penglibatan Pengguna (PP)) + 0.45(KepuasanPengguna (KPP)), persamaan regresi piawai (ZY-hatK-EMIS=0.22ZKS + 0.061ZKP + 0.26ZPP + 0.44ZKpP). Didapati tidak semua faktor yang dicadangkan dalam modelkerangka konsep menunjukkan korelasi yang signifikan dengan pemboleh ubahkejayaan penggunaan EMIS. Faktor kefahaman pengguna EMIS didapati tidak signifikandari segi korelasinya dengan pemboleh ubah kejayaan penggunaan EMIS dan terpaksa dikeluarkandaripada Model Kejayaan Penggunaan EMIS. Implikasi daripada kajian ini Kementerian PendidikanMalaysia perlu menambahbaik dasar sedia ada yang digunakan untuk membangunkan aplikasi pengurusansistem maklumat di Kementerian selaras denganintipati Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013 - 2025.
format	thesis
qualification_name
qualification_level	Doctorate
author	Mohd Faizal Md Karim
author_facet	Mohd Faizal Md Karim
author_sort	Mohd Faizal Md Karim
title	Permodelan hubungan antara kekuatan sistem, faktor pengguna dan gaya pengurusan sekolah dengan kejayaan penggunaan aplikasi sistem maklumat pengurusan pendidikan
title_short	Permodelan hubungan antara kekuatan sistem, faktor pengguna dan gaya pengurusan sekolah dengan kejayaan penggunaan aplikasi sistem maklumat pengurusan pendidikan
title_full	Permodelan hubungan antara kekuatan sistem, faktor pengguna dan gaya pengurusan sekolah dengan kejayaan penggunaan aplikasi sistem maklumat pengurusan pendidikan
title_fullStr	Permodelan hubungan antara kekuatan sistem, faktor pengguna dan gaya pengurusan sekolah dengan kejayaan penggunaan aplikasi sistem maklumat pengurusan pendidikan
title_full_unstemmed	Permodelan hubungan antara kekuatan sistem, faktor pengguna dan gaya pengurusan sekolah dengan kejayaan penggunaan aplikasi sistem maklumat pengurusan pendidikan
title_sort	permodelan hubungan antara kekuatan sistem, faktor pengguna dan gaya pengurusan sekolah dengan kejayaan penggunaan aplikasi sistem maklumat pengurusan pendidikan
granting_institution	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
granting_department	Fakulti Seni, Komputeran dan Industri Kreatif
publishDate	2018
url	https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=3
_version_	1747832879894757376
spelling	oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:32020-02-06 Permodelan hubungan antara kekuatan sistem, faktor pengguna dan gaya pengurusan sekolah dengan kejayaan penggunaan aplikasi sistem maklumat pengurusan pendidikan 2018 Mohd Faizal Md Karim LB2361 Curriculum Kajian ini adalah satu usaha yang dijalankan untuk mengetahui sejauh mana tahappenggunaan Pengurusan Sistem Maklumat Pendidikan (EMIS) di sekolah seluruh NegeriPerak Darul Ridzuan. Dalam penyelidikan ini, kejayaan penggunaan EMIS dilihat dari segi manfaatkepada individu dan organisasi. Reka bentuk penyelidikan ini adalah korelasi- deskriptif dan datakuantitatif dikumpul dengan menggunakan soal selidik. Penyelidikan ini menggunakan teknikpensampelan rawak strata untuk memilih 607 responden. Data kajian dianalisis dengan menggunakananalisis deskriptif dan analisis regrasi berganda. Kajian ini mendapati empat daripada enam faktoriaitu Kepuasan Pengguna EMIS (β = .45), Penglibatan Pengguna EMIS (β = .25), Kekuatan Sistem EMIS(β= .24), Kefahaman Pengguna EMIS (β = .20) adalah faktor penyumbang yang signifikan kepadakejayaan penggunaan EMIS dan menghasilkan persamaan regresi (Y-hatK-EMIS = -0.19 + 0.24(KekuatanSistem (KS)) + 0.20(Kefahaman Pengguna (KP)) + 0.25(Penglibatan Pengguna (PP)) + 0.45(KepuasanPengguna (KPP)), persamaan regresi piawai (ZY-hatK-EMIS=0.22ZKS + 0.061ZKP + 0.26ZPP + 0.44ZKpP). Didapati tidak semua faktor yang dicadangkan dalam modelkerangka konsep menunjukkan korelasi yang signifikan dengan pemboleh ubahkejayaan penggunaan EMIS. Faktor kefahaman pengguna EMIS didapati tidak signifikandari segi korelasinya dengan pemboleh ubah kejayaan penggunaan EMIS dan terpaksa dikeluarkandaripada Model Kejayaan Penggunaan EMIS. Implikasi daripada kajian ini Kementerian PendidikanMalaysia perlu menambahbaik dasar sedia ada yang digunakan untuk membangunkan aplikasi pengurusansistem maklumat di Kementerian selaras denganintipati Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013 - 2025. 2018 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=3 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=3 text zsm closedAccess Doctoral Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Seni, Komputeran dan Industri Kreatif Agarwal, B. (2000). Group Functioning and Community Forestry in South Asia: A GenderAnalysis and Conceptual Framework. Helsinki: World Institute for DevelopmentEconomics Research.Agarwal, R., Sambamurthy, V., & Stair, R. (2000). Research Report: The EvolvingRelationship Between General And Specific Computer Self Efficacy - An EmpiricalAssessment. Information System Research, 11, 418-430.Ahmad, A. H. (1999). Satu pendekatan dalam pembangunan sistem maklumat untukperancangan dan kawalan Institusi Pendidikan Tinggi Swasta (IPTS): satu kajian kesdi Jabatan Pendidikan Swasta, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.Ahmad, I. (2005). Education Management Information System (EMIS): RequirementsEngineering Towards a Web-Based System (Doctoral dissertation, Universiti UtaraMalaysia).Alpar, P., & Kim, M. (1990). A microeconomic approach to the measurement of informationtechnology value. Journal of Management Information Systems, 55-69.Alreck, P., & Settle, R. (1995). The Survey Research Handbook (2nd ed.). Chicago: Irwin.Alter, S., (1992). Information System. A management perspective. University of SanFrancisco, USA: Addison Wesley Publishing Co.Amdahl, G. M. (1988). Limits of Expectation. The International Journal of SupercomputingApplications. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/109434208800200107Applegate, L. M. (1991). Technology support for cooperative work: A framework forstudying introduction and assimilation in organizations. Journal of organizationalcomputing and electronic commerce, 1(1), 11-39.Ari, D., Jacobs, L.C., & Razavieh, A. (1972). Introduction to Research in Education. NewYork: CBS College Publishing.Aron, & Aron. (2007). Statistics in Psychology (4th ed.). New Delhi: Pearson EducationPublishers.Avison, D., & Fitzgerald, G. (1995). Information systems development: methodologies,techniques and tools. McGraw Hill.Azah, A. N., & Norizan, M. Y. (2012). Maturity Factors In Ecommerce Malaysia.Information Systems Security Management (ISSM). Retrieved fromhttp://repository.um.edu.my/32264/1/ISSM-eCOM_factor_final.pdfAzizi, Y., Noordin, Y., & Lim Ting Theng. (2007). Gaya Kepimpinan Guru Besar DanHubungan Dengan Fakto-Faktor Kepimpinan Di Sekolah Penerima AnugerahSekolah Cemerlang Di Negeri Melaka., (C), 19.Azlin Hairani.(2008). Pernilaian Terhadap Reka Bentuk SMPP dan PermasalahanPelaksanaanya di Sekolah Rendah dan Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Zon PerakUtara. Thesis (MSc.(Multimedia). Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.Azmi, I. M. (2004). Content Regulation in Malaysia: Unleashing Missiles on DangerousWeb Sites. Journal of Information, Law and Technology. Retrieved fromhttps://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/elj/jilt/2004_3/azmi/ida.docBabbie, E. R. (2008). The practice of social research. Wadsworth Publishing Company.Baharuddin Mohamad. (1999). Sistem Maklumat nikah,cerai dan aduan Jais denganberasaskan kompilasi Java. Kertas projek sarjana Teknologi Maklumat, Bangi:Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.Bailey, J. E., & Pearson, S. W. (1983). Development of a tool for measuring and analyzingcomputer user satisfaction. Management science, 29(5), 519-529.Baroudi, J. J., & Orlikowski, W. J. (1988). A short-form measure of user informationsatisfaction: a psychometric evaluation and notes on use. Journal of ManagementInformation Systems, 44-59.Barau, A., Kriebel, C. H., & Mukhopadhyay, T. (1995). Information technologies andbusiness value: An analytic and empirical investigation.Information systemsresearch, 6(1), 3-23.Bell, S. (1998). Managing and learning with logical frameworks: the case of an MIS projectin China. Human Systems Management, 17(1), 15-27.Bigelow, A. E. (1986). The development of reaching in blind children. British Journal ofDevelopmental Psychology, 4: 355-366. doi:10.1111/j.2044-835X.1986.tb01031.xBlake, R. R., & Mouton, J. S. (1985). The managerial grid III: The key to leadershipexcellence.Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. (1998). Qualitative Research for Education to Theory and Methods.Boston: Allyin and Bacon, Inc.Boon, Y., & Shaharuddin, M. M. (2011). Kepemimpinan guru besar dalam pelaksanaanpentaksiran berasaskan sekolah (PBS) di sekolah kebangsaan daerah Kota Tinggi,Johor. UNSPECIFIED, 1-9.BPPDP, KPM (2002). Prosiding Mesyuarat/Bengkel ISCED Projek UNIESCO/OECDdalam Pembinaan Indikator Pendidikan Dunia (world Education Indicators) WEI2000. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.BPPDP, KPM (2002). Mesyuarat Khas Pengurusan Pendidikan KPPM bil.2/2002.Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.BPPDP, KPM (2006). Manual EMIS Online. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.BPPDP, KPM (2008). Seminar kebangsaan Pengurusan Maklumat Pendidikan EMIS ke-IX.Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.Bryman, A. (1989). Research Methods and Organization Studies. Loughborough University:Unwin Hyman Ltd.Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. M. (1998). Beyond the Productivity Paradox. Communicationsof the ACM, 41(8), 49 - 55.Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. (1996). Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns toinformation systems spending. Management science, 42(4), 541-558.Calloway, L., & Knapp, C. (1995). Using grounded theory to interpret interviews. Technicalreport, School of Computer Science and Information Systems. Retrieved fromhttp://csis.pace.edu/~knapp/AIS95.htmCavaye, A. L. (1995). User participation in system development revisited. Information &Management, 28, 311-323. doi:10.1016/0378-7206(94)00053-LChin,J.P., Diehi,V.A., & Norman,K.L., (1988). Development of a tool measuring usersatisfaction of the human-computer interface,http://www.lap.umd.edu/lapfolder/papers/cdn.htmlChoo, L. L. (2000). Factors influencing students' choice of a private higher educationinstitution in Petaling Jaya. Masters thesis: University of Malaya.Chua, Y. P. (2006). Asas statistik Penyelidikan-Kaedah dan Statistik Penyelidikan-Buku 2.Chua, Y. P. (2006). Kaedah dan Statistik Penyelidikan. Asas statistic Penyelidikan Buku3. Selangor: McGraw-Hill (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.Chua, Y. P. (2006). Kaedah Penyelidikan-Kaedah dan Statistik Penyelidikan-Buku 1.Coakes, S. J., & Steed, L. (2005). SPSS Version 17.0 for Windows: Analysis WithoutAnguish. Singapore: John Wiley & Sons.Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling Techniques (3rd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Cohen, A., Fink, S., Gadon, H., & Willits, R. (2007). Effective Behavior in Organizations(Revised ed.). Homewood, III: Irwin.Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale:Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Application of social cognitive theory to trainingfor computer skills. Information systems research, 6(2), 118-143.Cooley, W. W., & Bickel, W. E. (1986). Decision-oriented educational research (Vol. 11).Springer Science & Business Media.Cozby, P.C. (2009). Methods in behavioral research tenth edition. Mc Graw Hill HigherEducation. New York.Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methodsapproaches. SAGE Publications, Incorporated.Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methodsresearch.Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2005). Mixed methods research: Developments, debates,and dilemmas. Research in organizations. Foundations and methods of inquiry, 315-326.Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M. L., & Hanson, W. E. (2003). Advancedmixed methods research designs. Handbook of mixed methods in social andbehavioral research, 61-78.Creswell, J.W. 2003. Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methodsapproaches. Ed. Ke-2. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Creswell, J.W. 2005. Educational research: planning, conducting and evaluatingquantitative and qualitative. Ed. Ke-2. New Jersey: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.Creswell, J.W. 2008. Educational Research; planning, conducting and evaluatingquantitative and qualitative research. Third Edition. Pearson EducationalInternational. University of Nebraska.Culpan, O. (1995). Attitudes of end-users towards information technology in manufacturingand service industries. Information & Management, 28, 167-176.Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance ofinformation technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340.Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computertechnology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management science, 35(8),982-1003.DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for thedependent variable. Information systems research, 3(1), 60-95.Delone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The Delone & Mclean model of informationsystems success: a ten-year update. Journal of management informationsystems, 19(4), 9-30.Doll, W. J., & Torkzadeh, G. (1988). The measurement of end-user computingsatisfaction. MIS quarterly, 259-274.Downing, C. E. (1997). An Empirical Examination of User Satisfaction With an InformationSystem Implementation.http://hsb,baylor.edu/ramsower/ais.ac.97/papers/dawing.htmlDowning, C. E. (1997). Rhetoric or Reality?: The Professed Satisfaction of Older Customerswith Information Technology. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing(JOEUC), 9(1), 15-27.Earl, M. J. (1996). Research Roundup. Business Strategy Review, 7: 54-58.doi:10.1111/j.1467-8616.1996.tb00115.xEason, K. (1988). Information Technology and Organisational ChangeTaylor &Francis. Great Britain.EPRD. (1994). Modul kajian tindakan [Action research module]. In PIER Project: SubProgram 4 - Educational research/ action research. Kementerian PendidikanMalaysia.Etezadi-Amoli, J., & Farhoomand, A. F. (1996). A structural model of end user computingsatisfaction and user performance. Information & Management, 30(2), 65-73.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-7206(95)00052-6Fisher, J. (2000). User Satisfaction and System Success: Considering the DevelopmentTeam. In 11th Australasian Conference on Information Systems (A Underwood6/12/2000 to 8/12/2000) (pp. 1-11). Queensland University of Technology.Franz, C. R., & Robey, D. (1986). Organizational context, user involvement, and theusefulness of information systems*. Decision Sciences, 17(3), 329-356.Friedenberg, L. (1995). Psychological testing: Design, analysis, and use. Massachusetts:Allyn & Bacon.Fulk, J. (1993). Social construction of communication technology. Academy of Managementjournal, 36(5), 921-950.Galbreath, J. (2000). Knowledge Management Technology in Education: AnOverview. Educational Technology, 40(5), 28-33.Galliers,R.D., & Baker, B.S.H., (1997). Strategic Information Sistem, ButerworthHeinemann.Galliers, R. D., & Baker, B. S. (1997). Strategic Information Management. Challenges andstrategies in managing information systems Oxford.Garrity, E. J., & Sanders, G. L. (Eds.). (1998). Information systems success measurement.Igi Global.Gay, L.R., Mills, G.E. & Airasian, P.(2006). Educational research: competencies foranalysis and applications. Ed. Ke-8. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: MerrillPrentice Hall.Gehrke, D., & Turban, E. (1999, January). Determinants of successful website design:relative importance and recommendations for effectiveness. In Systems Sciences,1999. HICSS-32. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conferenceon (pp. 8-pp). IEEE.Gehrke, D., Turban, E., & Lee, O. K. M. (1999). Consumer and literature survey results ofthe relative importance of website design categories. Proceedings of the 5thInternational Conference of the Decision Sciences Institute, Athens, Greece, July (pp.4-7).Ghafar, A., & Najib, M. (2003). Reka bentuk tinjauan soal selidik pendidikan.Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A.L., (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies forqualitative research, Chicago:Aldine.Goette, T. (2000). Keys to the adoption and use of voice recognition technology inorganizations. Information Technology & People, 13(1), 67-80.Goodhue, D. L. (1998). Development and measurement validity of a tasktechnology fitinstrument for user evaluations of information system. Decision Sciences, 29(1), 105-138.Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individualperformance. MIS quarterly, 213-236.Grover,V., Tens, T.C., & Fiedler,K.D., (1998). Information sistem effectiveness homepage.http://dmsweb.badm.sc.edu/grover/isworld/isoehom3.htmlGrudin, J. (1991). Interactive systems: Bridging the gaps between developers andusers. Computer, (4), 59-69.Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.).Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Hammer, M. (1997). Beyond Reengineering: How the Process-Centered Organization isChanging Our Work and Our Lives (1st ed.). HarperBusiness.Hammer, M., & Champy, J. (1993). Re-engineering the corporation, a manifesto forbusiness revolution. New York: Harper Collins.Hamzah Abu. (1998). Laporan pengalaman dan penggunaan Sistem Maklumat Pengurusandi Jabatan Pendidikan Negeri Sembilan oleh ketua unit maklumat. JPNS, Seremban,Negeri Sembilan.Hedberg, J. G., Harper, B., & Bloch, D. (1992). Educational information systems: Problemsof the small educational organization. Australian Journal of Educational Technology,8(2), 132-160.Heilman, M. E. (2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes preventwomen’s ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 657-674.Hesbon, O. N. (2010). Adapting DeLone and McLean's IS Success Model to Evaluate the e-School System. Proceedings of the International Conference on InformationManagement, (p. 518).Hellriegel, D.,& Slocum, J.W., (1992). Management. 6th Edition, Reading, USA: AddisonwesleyPublushing co.Hirschheim, R.A., (1997). Office automation: Concepts, technology and issues, Addison-Wesley.Ho, J. (1997). Evaluating the World Wide Web: A global study of commercial sites. Journalof ComputerMediated Communication, 3(1), 0-0.Hochstrasser, B., & Griffiths, C. (1990). Regaining control of IT Investments: a handbookfor senior management. London: Imperial College.Igbaria, M., Guimaraes, T., & Davis, G. B. (1995). Testing the determinants ofmicrocomputer usage via a structural equation model. Journal of managementinformation systems, 87-114.Ives, B., & Olson, M. H. (1984). User involvement and MIS success: A review ofresearch. Management science, 30(5), 586-603.Ives, B., Olson, M. H., & Baroudi, J. J. (1983). The measurement of user informationsatisfaction. Communications of the ACM, 26(10), 785-793.Jabatan Perkhdmatan Awam. (2009). HRMIS Transformasi Pengurusan Sumber ManusiaSektor Awam Malaysia Abad-21.Jackson, Sheril L. 2006. Research methods and statistics: A critical thinking approach Edisike-2. USA: Thomson dan Wadsworth.Jafri Abu. (2010). Pelaksanaan penempatan guru mengikut tugas dan kepuasan kerja diSekolah Menengah Kebangsaan di Malaysia. Tesis Dr. Fal, Fakulti Pendidikan,Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.Jones, S., & Hughes, J. (2000). IS value and investment appraisal: a case study of localauthority. Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, 2(1).http://is.twi.tudelft.nl/ejlse/vol2/issuei/paper3/paper.htmlJordan, E., & Burn, J. (1997). Information Systems Acceptance: A Consequence of Cultures.Information Systems Management Research Concentration (pp. 451-459). Brisbane:Queensland University of Technology.Jurison, J. (1996). The temporal nature of IS benefits: A longitudinal study.Information &Management, 30(2), 75-79.Kanellis, P., Lycett, M., & Paul, R. (1999). Evaluating business information systems fit:From concept to practical application. European Journal of Information Systems(9),65-76. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000316Karahanna, E. (1999). Symbolic Adoption of Information Technology. Proceedings ofDecision Sciences International Conference. Athens, Greece.Kementerian Pengangkutan Malaysia. (2011) . Pelan Strategik Teknologi Maklumat (2011- 2015)Kerschner, P.A, & Chelsvig, K.S., (1981). The aged user and technology, Presented at theConference on Communication Technology and the Elderlt, Issues dan Forecast,October 22-23, Cleveand, OhioKendrick, C. D. (2009). Project success factors and information technology project success.Thesis Report.Keng-Chieh, Y., Chia-Hui, H., Conna, Y., & Yu-Neng, T. (Summer 27-6-2016). Associationfor Information Systems AIS Electronic Library (AISeL). Pacific Asia Conferenceon Information Systems (PACIS). Retrieved fromhttp://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1378&context=pacis2016Khairiah Khalid. (1999). Pembangunan sistem maklumat saham amanah di syarikat PMB.Kertas projek sarjana teknologi maklumat, Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.Khedkar, R. V. (2011). System Design for Health Information Management in Rural India.ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.Kimble, C., & Selby, W. (2000). An interdisciplinary study of information systems:Christopher Alexanser and IS failure. 5th UKAIS Conference (pp. 256-265).University of Wales Institute, Cardiff: McGraw Hill.King, W. R., & Sabherwal, R. (1992). The factors affecting strategic information systemsapplications: An empirical assessment. Information & Management, 23(4), 217-235.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-7206(92)90046-IKirveenummi, M., Hirvo, H., & Eriksson, I. (1998). Framework for barriers to IS-relatedchange: Development and evaluation of a theoretical model. Proceedings of JointIFIP 8.2/8.6 Working Conference.Knapp, M. S. (1996). Methodological issues in evaluating integrated services initiatives. NewDirections for Evaluation, 21-34. doi:10.1002/ev.1025Koridor Raya Multimedia (1996). Edisi Pertama, Informatics, Kuala Lumpur.Kraut, R. E., Rice, R. E., Cool, C., & Fish, R. S. (1994, October). Life and death of newtechnology: task, utility and social influences on the use of a communication medium.In Proceedings of the 1994 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperativework (pp. 13-21). ACM.Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for researchactivities. Educ Psychol Meas.Lacity, M., & Hirschheim, R. (1993). Implementing information systems outsourcing: keyissues and experiences of an early adopter. Journal of General Management, 19, 17-29.Lagsten, J., & Goldkuhl, G. (2008). Interpretative IS evaluation: results and uses. TheElectronic Journal Information Systems Evaluation, 11(2), 97-108.Laporan Sistem Maklumat Pelajar (2000). Bahagian Sistem Maklumat, KementerianPendidikan Malaysia, Pusat Bandat Damansara.Laudon,K,C., & Laudon,J,P. (1999). Management Information Sistem, Organisation &Technology in the Networked Enterprise, 6th edition, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.IncLee, M.H.& Lee, K.K., (2000). The total quality assessment model of information sistem -focused on users’ views. http://informs.ssu.edu/papers/4790.pdfLee, H., Yoon, S., & Lee, B.-J. (1998). Thermodynamic prediction of interface phase atCu/solder joints. Journal of Electronic Materials, 27, 1161-1166.Leedy, P., & Omrod, J. (2005). Practical Research: Planning and Design Research (8th ed.).Ohio: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.Leonard, A. D., & Deschamps, I. (1988, October ). Managerial Influence in theImplementation of New Technology. Management Science. Retrieved fromhttps://www.researchgate.net/profile/Isabelle_Deschamps3/publication/227445927_Managerial_Influence_in_the_Implementation_of_New_Technology/links/5592a9b008ae5af2b0eb4dd3/Managerial-Influence-in-the-Implementation-of-New-Technology.pdfLi, E. Y. (1997). Perceived importance of information system success factors: A metaanalysis of group differences. Information & management,32(1), 15-28.Li, Z. (1997). Primary Cortical Dynamics Visual Grouping. Technical Report HKUST-CS97-11. Retrieved from http://repository.ust.hk/ir/bitstream/1783.1-93/1/tr9711.pdfLin, C., & Pervan, G. (2000). Realising the benefits of IS/IT investments in Australianorganisations. Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS 2000), 11.Brisbane.Lincke, D. M. (1998). Evaluating integrated electronic commerce systems. ElectronicMarkets, 8(1), 7-11.Loveman, G. (1988, July). An Assessment of the Productivity Impact of InformationTechnologies. Management in the 1990s.Lu, H. P., & Wang, J. Y. (1997). The relationships between management styles, userparticipation, and system success over MIS growth stages. Information &Management, 32(4), 203-213.Lucas Jr, H. C., & Baroudi, J. (1994). The role of information technology in organizationdesign. Journal of management information systems, 9-19Lyytinen, K., & Robey, D. (1999). Learning failure in information systemsdevelopment. Information Systems Journal, 9(2), 85-101.Mahmood, M. A., & Mann, G. J. (2000). Special Issue: Impacts of Information TechnologyInvestment on Organizational Performance. J. of Management InformationSystems, 16(4), 3-10.Maimunah, M. (2005). Kepimpinan situasi di kalangan pengetua sekolah di Malaysia. TesisKedoktoran (Tidak Diterbitkan). Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.Markhaini, W. S. (2003). The Knowledge and Perspectives about Educational ManagementInformation System (EMIS/SMPP) of Decision-Makers in the Malaysian Ministry ofEducation (MMOE): An inquiry into the implementation of an EMIS. UnpublishedPhD Thesis.Man-Ting, K., Chien-Yun, D., & Charng-Tze, H (2012). Applying Information SystemSuccess Model to Explore the Usage Behavior of Information Systems-A Case ofEasy Teaching Web.Martinsons, M. G., & Westwood, R. I. (1997). Management information systems in theChinese business culture: An explanatory theory. Information & Management, 32(5),215-228.McBride, N., (2001). Chaos Theory and Information Sistems. http://www.cms.dmu.ac.uk/-nkm/chaos.htmlMcKeen, J. D., & Guimaraes, T. (1997). Successful strategies for user participation insystems development. Journal of Management Information Systems, 133-150.McKeen, J. D., Guimaraes, T., & Wetherbe, J. C. (1994). The relationship between userparticipation and user satisfaction: an investigation of four contingency factors. MisQuarterly, 427-451.Mertens, D. M. (1998). Research methods in education and psychology: Integrating diversitywith quantitative & qualitative approaches.Millman, Z., & Hartwick, J. (1987). The impact of automated office systems on middlemanagers and their work. MIS quarterly, 479-491.Misic, M. (1996). The skills needed by today's systems analysts. Journal of SystemsManagement, 47(3), 34-37.Mitra, S., & Chaya, A. (1996). Analyzing cost-effectiveness of organizations: the impact ofinformation technology spending. Journal of Management Information Systems,13(2), 29-57. Retrieved fromhttps://www.researchgate.net/deref/http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1080%2F07421222.1996.11518122Mogadam, A., Rostami, V., & Salehi, M. (2010). Usefulness of Accounting InformationSystem in Emerging Economy: Empirical Evidence of Iran. Retrieved fromhttps://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/987b/e91c2a08f289a25583165d97a1e422a1da29.pdfMoh’d Al-adaileh, R. (2009). An evaluation of information systems success: A userperspective-the case of Jordan Telecom Group. European Journal of ScientificResearch, 37(2), 226-239.Mohd Ghani Awang, Suriya. K, Siti Zanariah & Balan.K. (2008). An introduction toresearch methodogy for social sciences. Universiti Malaysia Pahang. Kuantan.Mohd Majid Konting. (2005). Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan. Ed ke-7. Kuala Lumpur:Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.Mohd. Majid Konting. (1990). Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan. Dewan Bahasa danPustaka.Mohd. Majid Konting. (2000). Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan. Dewan Bahasa danPustaka. Kuala Lumpur.Morgan,C.T., & King, R.A. (2004). Introduction to psychology and education. New York:John Wiley and Sons.Muda, M. (2005). Kepemimpinan situasi di kalangan pengetua sekolah di Malaysia.Myers, S., Beck, S., Zandt, G., & Wallace, T. (1998). Lithospheric-scale structure across theBolivian Andes from tomographic images of velocity and attenuation for P and Swaves. J. Geophys. Res., 103, 21,233-21,252, .Nichols, M. C. (1994). Using style guidelines to create consistent onlineinformation. Technical communication, 432-438.Nik Abdullah Nik Abdul Kadir. (2005). Measuring Data Quality: A Case Study onEducational Management Information System (EMIS). Thesis(M.Sc). UniversitiTeknologi Mara. Selangor.Nik Kamaruzaman, A. T. (2008). Hubungan Penggunaan Sistem Maklumat PerakaunanPengurusan Dan Prestasi Organisasi Penjagaan Kesihatan Swasta Malaysia DiWaktu Ketidakpastian Persekitaran. Universiti Sains Malaysia.Nizam Abd Latip. (2004). Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kejayaan Penggunaan SistemMaklumat Pelajar Berasaskan Komputer Di Maktab Perguruan. Universiti PutraMalaysiaNoah, S. M. (2003). Reka bentuk penyelidikan: falsafah, teori dan praktis: sebuah bukumesra pengguna. Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia.Noah, S. M. (2001). Perkembangan kerjaya: Teori dan praktis. Serdang: PerkhidmatanPercetakan Fakulti Pengajian Pendidikan.Nor Azan Hj Mat Zin (1997). Panduan menggunakan sistem inventori Pusat Maklumat.Tesis(M.ed), Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.Oppenheim, A.N. (2005). Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement:New edition. Pinter Publications. New York.Orlikowski, W. J., Walsham, G., & Jones, M. (1996). Information technology and changesin organizational work: Images and reflections. Information Technology andChanges in Organizational Work.Osterman, P. (1986, January 1). The Impact of Computers on the Employment of Clerks andManagers. 39(2), pp. 175-186. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/001979398603900201Owens, S. (2000). Engaging the Public’: Information and Deliberation in EnvironmentalPolicy. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 32(7), 1141 - 1148.Pallant, J., & Manual, S. S. (2007). A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS forwindows version 15.Pandiyan.V.& Chandaran. V.G.R. (2009). Research Methods. University Publication centre(UPENA). Shah Alam.Parker, J. C. (1989). Multiphase flow and transport in porous media. Rev. Geophys., 27(3),311-328. doi:10.1029/RG027i003p00311Parnisto, J. (1996). Factors affecting groupware success: A case study.Parsley W., M., & Perez-Meza, D. (2010). Review of Factors Affecting the Growth andSurvival of Follicular Grafts. Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery, 3(2), 69-75. doi:http://doi.org/10.4103/0974-2077.69014Pegler, G. (1992). Perspectives for school information systems. Australian Journal ofEducational Technology, 8(2), 161-171. Retrieved fromhttp://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet8/pegler.htmlPérez-Mira, B. (2010). Validity of Delone & Mclean’s model of information systems successat the web site level of analysis (Doctoral dissertation, Northwestern StateUniversity).Peter, H.-U., Büsser, C., Mustafa, O., & Pfeiffer, S. (2008). Risk assessment for the FildesPeninsula and Ardley Island and the development of management plans fordesignation as Antarctic Specially Protected or Managed Areas. Dessau: GermanFederal Environment Agency. Retrieved fromhttp://www.umweltdaten.de/publikationen/fpdf-l/3478.pdfPopel,H.,(1997). Who needs the office of the future, Havard Business Review, July 1997.Rafiza (2013). Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik. Strategi pembelajaran secarakolaboratif atas talian dalam analisis novel Bahasa Melayu. 1:3.Ragowsky, A., Ahituv, N., & Neumann, S. (1996). Identifying the value and importance ofan information system application. Information & Management, 31(2), 89-102.Rai, A., Patnayakuni, R., & Patnayakuni, N. (1997). Technology Investment and BusinessPerformance. Communications of the ACM. Retrieved fromhttps://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ravi_Patnayakuni/publication/220425560_Technology_Investment_and_Business_Performance/links/5621718808aea35f2681bac9/Technology-Investment-and-Business-Performance.pdfRamdan, S. Y., Nurdiana, A., & Kamarudin, S. (2013). Measuring EGovernment SystemSuccess: A Validation of the Delone and Mclean Model of Islamic InformationSystem Success. Sustainable Development Through The Islamic Economics System.Paper Proceeding of the 5th Islamic Economics System Conference (iECONS 2013).Remenyi, D. (2000). The Elusive Nature of Delivering Benefits from IT Investment. TheElectronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, 3(1). Retrieved fromwww.itera.rug.nl/ejise/vol3/paper1.htmlRizal, A. R. S. (2011). Hubungan Antara Pengurusan Perubahan dan Kejayaan SistemMaklumat di PDRM (Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Utara Malaysia).Robey, D., & Boudreau, M. C. (1999). Accounting for the contradictory organizationalconsequences of information technology: Theoretical directions and methodologicalimplications. Information systems research, 10(2), 167-185.Robson, W. (1997). Strategic management & information systems (2nd ed.). England: PersonEducation Limited.Roger, R. (1995, December 1). Questions of Identity: Personhood and collectivity intransnational migration to the United States. Department of Anthropology, 15(4),351-380. Retrieved fromhttp://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0308275X9501500406Romtech . (1989). Computing opinion survey. Romtech Report.Rose, G., Khoo, H., & Straub, D. W. (1999). Current technological impediments to businessto-consumer electronic commerce. Communications of the AIS, 1(5es), 1.Rosseni, D. (2010). Development and Validation of an Integrated Meaningful Hybrid etraining(i-met) for Computer Science: Theoretical Empirical Based Design andDevelopment approach (Tesis Dr.Falsaafah ed.). Fakulti Teknologi dan SainsMaklumat: Universiti Kebangsaan MalaysiaRossman, G. B., & Rallis, S. F. (2003). Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitativeresearch. Sage.Rouse, A., Watson, D.,Gilbert, A., & Dilnutt, R., (1995). System development practices: Acomparison of the experience of Australian and United States organizations. 1995Pan Pacific Conference on Information System, Singapore, National University ofSingapore, 46-57.Rust, R. T., & Oliver, R. L. (Eds.). (1994). Service quality: New directions in theory andpractice. Sage Publications.Ryan, T., & Bock, D. (1992). A socio-technical system viewpoint to CASE tool adoption.Journal of System Management, 43(11), 25-29.Ryker, R., & Nath, R. (1998). User satisfaction determinants: the role of hardware andprocedural components. Journal of Computer information system, XXXVIII (2):44-48.Saarinen, J. (1996). Target Localisation and Identification in Rapid Visual Search.Perception, 25(3), 305 - 311.Saarinen, T. (1996). An expanded instrument for evaluating information systemsuccess. Information & management, 31(2), 103-118.Saleh, A. R. (1999). Sistem maklumat akademik UUM: Penerokaan dengan menggunakanperisian SAS.Saeidi, P., & Malek Marzban, A. (2012). Measuring the Success of Information Systems (IS)from Users’ Point of View Using Goodhue Index. Asian Journal of Finance &Accounting. doi:5. 10.5296/ajfa.v5i1.2629Salleh Hudin, M., & Nurnasran, P. (2010). Aplikasi konsep Library 2.0 dalam perkhidmatandan pengurusan sumber maklumat elektronik.Salmela, H. (1997). From information systems quality to sustainable business quality.Information and Software Technology, 39(12), 819-825.Sambamurthy, V., & Kirsch, L. J. (2000). An integrative framework of the informationsystems development process. Decision Sciences, 31(2), 391-399.Sarwani, M. W. (2003). The knowledge and perspectives about educational managementinformation system (EMIS/SMPP) of decision-makers in the Malaysian Ministry ofEducation (MMOE): an inquiry into the implementation of an EMIS (Doctoraldissertation, University of Warwick).Sarwani, M. W. (2003). The knowledge and perspectives about educational managementinformation system (EMIS/SMPP) of decision-makers in the Malaysian Ministry ofEducation (MMOE): an inquiry into the implementation of an EMIS (Doctoraldissertation, University of Warwick).Scarbrough, H., (1993). Problems-solution in the Management of Information SystemExpertise. Journal of Management Studies, 30:6, 939-953.Seddon, P. B. (1997). A respecification and extension of the Delone & Mclean model of ISsuccess. Information systems research, 8(3), 240-253.Sekaran, U.2000. Research methods for business: a skill building approach. Ed. Ke-3. NewYork: John Wiley.Selz, D., & Schubert, P. (1998, January). Web assessment-a model for the evaluation and theassessment of successful electronic commerce applications. In System Sciences,1998., Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on (Vol. 4,pp. 222-231). IEEE.Shannon, R., & Chatterjee, M. (1998). Forward masked excitation patterns in multielectrodeelectrical stimulation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 103, 2565-2572.Shin, D.-M. (2003). Social and Economic Policies in Korea: Ideas, networks and linkages,.Journal of Social Policy, 33(1), xix-241. doi:10.1017/S0047279403247280Siegle, D. (2002). Principles and methods in educational research. Ethics.Simon, H., (1994). The executive as decision-maker, Readings in Decision Support System,D. Arnott and P.O’Donnell, Melbourne, Department of Information System, MonashUniversity, 59-64.Soemartini. (2007). Outlier (Pencilan). Bandung: UNPAD.Srivihok, A. (2000). An assessment tool for electronic commerce: end user evaluation of webcommerce sites. Technical Report, Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University,Bangkok, Thailand.Stevens, J. (1996). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Mahwah: LawrenceErlbaum.Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory proceduresand techniques. Sage Publications, Inc.Surat Pekeliling Perbendaharaan Bil. 7 tahun 2011. Pengumpulan maklumat perolehankerajaan menggunakan Government Procurement Information System (GPIS) danPortal MYPROCUREMENT.Tabachnick, B. G. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.Tait, P., & Vessey, I. (1988, March). The effect of User Involvement on System Success: Acontingency Approach. MIS Quarterly, 91-108Taylor, S., & Bogdan, R. (1984). Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: The Searchfor Meanings (2nd ed.). Toronto: John Wiley and Sons.Teacher Assist Creating Tool.(1998). Sistem Rekaan Bantuan Guru, Kuala Lumpur: PacificSoftware Sdn Bhd.Teh, A., Abdulatiff, H., & Kamaruzaman, N. (2008). Hubungan Penggunaan SistemMaklumat Perakaunan Pengurusan Dan Prestasi Organisasi Penjagaan KesihatanSwasta Malaysia Di Waktu Ketidakpastian Persekitaran (Doctoral dissertation,Universiti Sains Malaysia).Telem, M. (1989). Managing information growth and integration in smallorganizations. Information processing & management, 25(4), 443-452.Turner, R., & Lowry, G. (1999, December). Educating information systems professionals:Towards a rapprochement between new graduates and employers. In 10thAustralasian Conference on Information Systems, Victoria University of Wellington,Sl of Communications and Information Management, Victoria University ofWellington.Uhlig,R., Faber, D.,& Bair, J., (1995). The office of the future, North-Holland.Uma, S., & Roger, B. (2003). Research methods for business: A skill buildingapproach. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York.Venkatesh, V., Speier, C., & Morris, M. G. (2002). User acceptance enablers in individualdecision making about technology: Toward an integrated model. DecisionSciences, 33(2), 297-316.Visscher, A. J., Fung, A. C., & Wild, P. (1999). The evaluation of the large scaleimplementation of a computer-assisted management information system in HongKong schools. Studies in educational evaluation, 25(1), 11-31.Ward, J., & Griffiths, P. (1996). Strategic planning for information systems. New York: JohnWiley and Sons.Warren, M. W., & Maples, W. R. (1997). The anthropometry of contemporary commercalcremation. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 42(3), 417-423.Waterson, P. E., Older Gray, M. T., & Clegg, C. (2002). A sociotechnical method fordesigning work systems. Human Factors, 44(3), 376-391.Weber, Y., & Pliskin, N. (1996). The effects of information systems integration andorganizational culture on a firm's effectiveness. Information & Management, 30(2),81-90.Westrup, C. (1996). The play of information systems development: Drama and ritual in thedevelopment of a nursing information system. Information Technology & People,9(2), 24-42. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/09593849610121589Wiersma, W. & Jurs, S.G. (2000). Research methods in education : an introduction. Ed . Ke-7. Boston : Pearson/ Allyn and Bacon.Wiersma, W. & Jurs, S.G. (2005). Research methods in education : an introduction. Ed . Ke-8. Boston : Pearson/ Allyn and Bacon.Willcocks, L. (1991). Shaping the Future. Business Design Through InformationTechnology. Journal of Information Technology, 6(3-4), 237-237.Wilson, J. R. (2000). Fundamentals of ergonomics in theory and practice. AppliedErgonomics, 31, 557-567.Winfield, I. (1991). Organisations and information technology: Systems, power and jobdesign. Blackwell Scientific.Winklhofer, H. (2000). An Exploration of the effects of organisational change on thedevelopment, implementation and operation of information systems.Winklhofer, H. (2001, January). Organizational change as a contributing factor to IS failureIn System Sciences. 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference. IEEE.Wiseman, R. L., Marcoulides, G. A., & Mayes, B. T. (1995). Measuring computer anxietyin the work environment. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55(5), 804-810.Wixom, B. H., & Todd, P. A. (2005). A theoretical integration of user satisfaction andtechnology acceptance. Information systems research, 16(1), 85-102.Woo, D. M., & Vicente, K. J. (2003). Sociotechnical systems, risk management, and publichealth: comparing the North Battleford and Walkerton outbreaks. ReliabilityEngineering and System Safety, 80, 253-269.Yahya, A., Hashim, S., Ramli, J., Boon, Y., & Hamdan, A. R. (2007). Menguasaipenyelidikan dalam pendidikan: Teori, analisis & interpretasi data. PTS Pendidikan.Yusof, Z. M., & Lambak, M. (2008). Pengurusan sistem maklumat pendidikan: implikasipengautomasian ke atas pengajaran dan kebolehgunaan data. Akademika, 74, 89-113.Yusof, Z. M., & Noor, N. M. (2010). Konflik dan kesamaran peranan dalam kalanganpersonel teknologi maklumat dalam perkhidmatan Tentera DaratMalaysia. Akademika, 78, 59-66.Yusof, & Musa, M. (2011). Kepemimpinan Guru Besar Dalam Pelaksanaan PentaksiranBerasaskan Sekolah (PBS). Sekolah Kebangsaan Daerah Kota Tinggi, Johor.Yusrizal. (2013). Improving Students' Reading Comprehension By Using Concept MappingAt Sixth Semester Of PGSD Program Of Open University Of Bengkulu. Mastersthesis: Universitas Negeri Padang.Zadiah Zainudin. (1998). Sistem Maklumat perundangan 5S perbadanan produktivitiNegara. Projek Sarjana Teknologi Maklumat, Bangi: Universiti KebangsaanMalaysia.Zarina, I. (2013). Hubungan antara prinsip transformasi perkhidmatan dan kualitiperkhidmatan di sektor awam. Sekolah siswazah: Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM).Zawiyah, M. Y., & Mariah, L. (2008). Pengurusan Sistem Maklumat Pendidikan: ImplikasiPengautomasian ke Atas Pengajaran dan Kebolehgunaan Data. Akademika, Jilid74(Sept - Disember).Zawiyah, M. Y., & Norli, M. N. (2010). Konflik dan kesamaran peranan dalam kalanganpersonel teknologi maklumat dalam perkhidmatan Tentera Darat Malaysia.AKADEMIKA, 78, 59-66.Zeithaml, A. V., & Gilly, M. (1987, January). Characteristics Affecting the Acceptance ofRetailing Technologies: A Comparison of Elderly and Nonelderly Consumers.Journal of Retailing, 63(1), 49-68. Retrieved fromhttps://www.researchgate.net/profile/Valarie_Zeithaml/publication/232524287_Characteristics_Affecting_the_Acceptance_of_Retailing_Technologies_A_Comparison_of_Elderly_and_Nonelderly_Consumers/links/59f0e5c4a6fdcc1dc7b8f2b0/Characteristics-Affecting-the-AcZelazny, L. M. (2011). Toward a Theory of Information System Development Success:Perceptions of Software Development Team Members.

Permodelan hubungan antara kekuatan sistem, faktor pengguna dan gaya pengurusan sekolah dengan kejayaan penggunaan aplikasi sistem maklumat pengurusan pendidikan

Similar Items