Pengaruh atribut inovasi sebagai pengantara dalam hubungan antara kepimpinan teknologi dengan integrasi teknologi web

Pengaruh atribut inovasi sebagai pengantara dalam hubungan antara kepimpinan teknologi dengan integrasi teknologi web

Kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengenal pasti hubungan antara Atribut Inovasi (AI), KepimpinanTeknologi Guru (KTG) dan Integrasi Teknologi (IT) web di sekolah serta pengaruh AI sebagaipengantara di antara KTG dan IT. Pendekatan kuantitatif dengan reka bentuk tinjauan telah digunakandalam kajian ini. Ser...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Khairul Syazwan Zamri
Format: thesis
Language:zsm
Published: 2018
Subjects:
LB Theory and practice of education
Online Access:https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5062
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:5062
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
collection UPSI Digital Repository
language zsm
topic LB Theory and practice of education
spellingShingle LB Theory and practice of education
Khairul Syazwan Zamri
Pengaruh atribut inovasi sebagai pengantara dalam hubungan antara kepimpinan teknologi dengan integrasi teknologi web
description Kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengenal pasti hubungan antara Atribut Inovasi (AI), KepimpinanTeknologi Guru (KTG) dan Integrasi Teknologi (IT) web di sekolah serta pengaruh AI sebagaipengantara di antara KTG dan IT. Pendekatan kuantitatif dengan reka bentuk tinjauan telah digunakandalam kajian ini. Seramai 412 orang responden telah dipilih menggunakan dua peringkat persampelaniaitu kluster dan berstrata. Sampel kajian terdiri daripada guru- guru dari sekolah zon selatanSemenanjung Malaysia yang dikategorikan sebagai lima bintang dalam penarafan Smart SchoolQualification Standards (SSQS). Tiga set instrumen iaitu National Educational Standards -Administrator (NETS-A), Diffusion of Innovation dan Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge(TPACK) telah digunakan dalam kajian ini. Data telah dianalisis dengan menggunakan Model PersamaanStruktural. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan terdapat hubungan yang signifikan antara KTG dan AI (β=0.64, p = 0.001), AI dan IT (β =0.69, p = 0.003) dan KTG dan IT (β = 0.35, p = 0.022). Selain itu,dapatan juga mendapati konstruk AI merupakan pengantara penuh antara konstruk KTG dengan IT.Kesimpulannya AI berpengaruh secara signifikan dan memainkan peranan besar antara KTG dengan IT di sekolah. Implikasi kajian ini boleh dijadikan sebagai rujukan dalam merangkamodul Latihan Dalam Perkhidmatan (LADAP) kepada guru-guru.
format thesis
qualification_name
qualification_level Doctorate
author Khairul Syazwan Zamri
author_facet Khairul Syazwan Zamri
author_sort Khairul Syazwan Zamri
title Pengaruh atribut inovasi sebagai pengantara dalam hubungan antara kepimpinan teknologi dengan integrasi teknologi web
title_short Pengaruh atribut inovasi sebagai pengantara dalam hubungan antara kepimpinan teknologi dengan integrasi teknologi web
title_full Pengaruh atribut inovasi sebagai pengantara dalam hubungan antara kepimpinan teknologi dengan integrasi teknologi web
title_fullStr Pengaruh atribut inovasi sebagai pengantara dalam hubungan antara kepimpinan teknologi dengan integrasi teknologi web
title_full_unstemmed Pengaruh atribut inovasi sebagai pengantara dalam hubungan antara kepimpinan teknologi dengan integrasi teknologi web
title_sort pengaruh atribut inovasi sebagai pengantara dalam hubungan antara kepimpinan teknologi dengan integrasi teknologi web
granting_institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
granting_department Fakulti Pengurusan dan Ekonomi
publishDate 2018
url https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5062
_version_ 1747833161912418304
spelling oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:50622020-08-04 Pengaruh atribut inovasi sebagai pengantara dalam hubungan antara kepimpinan teknologi dengan integrasi teknologi web 2018 Khairul Syazwan Zamri LB Theory and practice of education Kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengenal pasti hubungan antara Atribut Inovasi (AI), KepimpinanTeknologi Guru (KTG) dan Integrasi Teknologi (IT) web di sekolah serta pengaruh AI sebagaipengantara di antara KTG dan IT. Pendekatan kuantitatif dengan reka bentuk tinjauan telah digunakandalam kajian ini. Seramai 412 orang responden telah dipilih menggunakan dua peringkat persampelaniaitu kluster dan berstrata. Sampel kajian terdiri daripada guru- guru dari sekolah zon selatanSemenanjung Malaysia yang dikategorikan sebagai lima bintang dalam penarafan Smart SchoolQualification Standards (SSQS). Tiga set instrumen iaitu National Educational Standards -Administrator (NETS-A), Diffusion of Innovation dan Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge(TPACK) telah digunakan dalam kajian ini. Data telah dianalisis dengan menggunakan Model PersamaanStruktural. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan terdapat hubungan yang signifikan antara KTG dan AI (β=0.64, p = 0.001), AI dan IT (β =0.69, p = 0.003) dan KTG dan IT (β = 0.35, p = 0.022). Selain itu,dapatan juga mendapati konstruk AI merupakan pengantara penuh antara konstruk KTG dengan IT.Kesimpulannya AI berpengaruh secara signifikan dan memainkan peranan besar antara KTG dengan IT di sekolah. Implikasi kajian ini boleh dijadikan sebagai rujukan dalam merangkamodul Latihan Dalam Perkhidmatan (LADAP) kepada guru-guru. 2018 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5062 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5062 text zsm closedAccess Doctoral Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Pengurusan dan Ekonomi Abang Ahmad Ridzuan, Hong Kian Sam, & Aliza Ahmad (2001). Teacher Educators'Attitudes Toward Computers: A Study Among Teacher Educators In Teacher'- Training Colleges InJohor, Malaysia. Jurnal Teknologi, 35(E) Dis. 2001: 21-32. Dimuat turun daripada http://eprints.utm.my/1511/1/JT35E3.pdfAbd Hamid, S. R., Syed Hassan, S. S., & Ismail, N. H. (2012). Teaching Quality and PerformanceAmong Experienced Teachers in Malaysia. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(11). Dimuatturun dari http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2012v37n11.2ACRL Association of College & Research Libraries (2011). Standards For Libraries in HigherEducation. Chicago. Dimuat turun dariphttp://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/standards/slhe.pdfAdonis, L. A. (2006). Technology in schools. Manager: British Journal of Administrative Management, 52 , 14-15.Alkrdem M., (2014). Technological Leadership Behavior Of High School Headteachers In Asir Region,Saudi Arabia. Journal of International Education Research - Second Quarter 2014 Volume 10, Number2.Al Ghaith, W.A., Sanzogni, L. and Sandhu, K.S. 2010. Factors influencing the adoption and usage ofon line services in Saudi Arabia. The Electronic Journal on Information Systems in DevelopingCountries. Vol. 40, no. 1: 1-32.Al-Sulaimani, A. A. (2010). The importance of teachers in integrating ICT into science teaching inintermediate schools in Saudi Arabia: A mixed methods study. PhD Thesis published by School ofEducation, College of Design and Social Context RMIT University.Ahmad Subki & Syed Ismail (2012). Asas Kepimpinan Dan Perkembangan Profesionalisme. Selangor:Penerbitan Multimedia SDN. BHD.Ahmed P.K., Shepherd C. (2010). Innovation Management: Context, Strategies, Systems And Processes.Harlow: Financial Times Prentice Hall.Aishah Tamby Omar, Sabariah Sharif dan George Tamaki (2010). Kepimpinan Pengetua dan KompetensiGuru Ke Arah Pengintegrasian Teknologi Maklumat Dalam Pengajaran Di Sekolah Menengah Daerah Kudat.Jurnal Penyelidikan Pendidikan Guru, Jilid 5, 2010. Putrajaya: Bahagian Pendidikan GuruAli Yassin S., A., & Ibrahim H., I., (2014) The Impact of Leadership Style on Corporate Innovation:Survey from Telecommunication Industry in Somalia International Journal of Academic Research inManagement (IJARM) Vol. 3,No. 3, 2014, Page: 233-241, ISSN: 2296-1747Anderson, R. E., & Dexter, S. (2005). School technology leadership: An empiricalinvestigation of prevalence and effect. Educational Administration Quarterly,41(1), pp.49-82.Andoh C. B., (2012). Factors influencing teachers’ adoption and integration of information andcommunication technology into teaching: A review of the literature. International Journal ofEducation and Development using Information and Communication Technology(IJEDICT), 2012, Vol. 8,Issue 1,pp. 136-155.Antikainen A. & Eriksson P. (2007). Gender And Innovation: Tales of Women And Men Leading FinnishICT-Companies. Dimuat turun daripadahttps://www.researchgate.net/profile/Paeivi_Eriksson/publication/267400145_GENDER_AND_INNOVATION_TALES_OF_WOMEN_AND_MEN_LEADING_FINNISH_ICT_COMPANIES_Anu_Antikainen/links/547eac240cf2c1 e3d2dc2130.pdf pada 30 Disember2016.ASCD, (2015). Teacher Leadership; The What, Why, and How of Teadhers As Leaders, A Report on AReport on the Fall 2014 ASCD Whole Child Symposium.Arab News (2014). Watani net project kicks off at Jeddah school. Dimuat turun dariwww.arabnews.com.node/.Arumugam Raman & Abdul Halim Mohamed, (2013). Issues of ICT Usage Among Malaysian Secondary SchoolEnglish Teachers. English Language Teaching; Vol. 6, No. 9; 2013. ISSN 1916-4742 E-ISSN1916-4750. Published byCanadian Center of Science and EducationArumugam Raman , Yahya Don & Abd. Latif Kasim (2014) . The Relationship between Principals’Technology Leadership and Teachers’ Technology Use in Malaysian Secondary Schools. Asian SocialScience; Vol. 10, No. 18; 2014 ISSN 1911-2017Bal Y., Bozkurt S. & Ertemsir E. (2013). A Study On Determining The Relationship Between StrategicHRM Practices And Innovation In Organization. Knowledge Management & Innovation. 19- 21 June 2013.Zadar Crotia.Banoglu K. (2011). School Principals’ Technology Leadership Competency and TechnologyCoordinatorship. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice- (11)1. 208-213.Beuningan J. V., Houwen K. V. D. & Moonen L. (2014). Measuring well being. An Analysis of differentresponse scales. Statistics Netherlands.Billheimer, Dixie M., (2007). "A Study of West Virginia Principals : Technology Standards,Professional Development, and Effective Instructional TechnologyLeaders", Dissertations and Capstones.Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum (2014). Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi AplikasiDi Sekolah. Cepat Cetak Sdn. Bhd. Selangor.Brislin, R. W., Lonner, W., & Thorndike, R. M. (1973). Cross-cultural research methods. New York:John Wiley.Cakir R., (2012). Technology Intergration and Technology Leadership In Schools As LearningOrganizations. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - October 2012, volume 11 Issue4.Chen, N.-S., & Fang, W.-C. (2013). Guest Editorial: Grand Challenges and Research Directions ine-Learning of the 21th Century. Educational Technology & Society, 16 (2), 1-2.Chigona W. & Licker P. (2008). Using Diffusion of Innovations Framework to Explain CommunalComputing Facilities Adoption Among the Urban Poor. Volume 4, Number 3, Spring/Summer 2008, 57-73.Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches(2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Chang, I.-H. (2012). The effect of principals’ technological leadership on teachers’ technologicalliteracy and teaching effectiveness in Taiwanese elementary schools. Educational Technology &Society, 15(2), 328-340.Che Sulaiman, I. S. & Wahab, J. A. (2017). Pendekatan Kepimpinan Transformasional Menangani IsuGuru Di Sekolah. Simposium Pendidikan diPeribadikan: Perspektif Risalah An-Nur (SPRiN2017).Chua Yan Piaw. (2006). Kaedah Penyelidikan Buku 1. Kuala Lumpur: Mc Graw Hill(M) Sdn. Bhd.Coe R., Aloisi C., Higgins S. dan Major L. E., (2014). What Makes Great Teaching?Review of underpinning research. Centre for Evaluation & Monitoring,Durham University dan The Sutton Trust.Courville K. (2011). Educational Technology: Effective Leadership and Current Initiatives. PaperPresented at the 2011 Louisiana Computer Using Educator’s Conference (November 28th - 29th NewOrleans, Louisiana)Creswell J. W., Klassen A. C., Clark V. L & Smith K. C. (2011). Best Practices for Mixed MethodsResearch in the Health Sciences . Of ce of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research (OBSSR). Dimuatturun daripada https://www2.jabsom.hawaii.edu/native/docs/tsudocs/Best_Practices_for_Mixed_Methods_Research_Aug2011.pdfCuszon, S. (2004). Developing faculty-librarian partnerships in information literacy.In I. R. Associates (Ed.), Integrating information literacy into the highereducation curriculum: Practical models for transformation (pp. 29-46). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Davis P. (2010). Innovation. Scanlon Leadership Network. Dimuat turun daripada www. scanlon leader.OrgDawson, C., & Rakes, C.R. (2003). The influence of principals’ technology training on theintegration of technology into schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 36(1), 29-49.Dexter, S. L. (2011). School technology leadership: Artifacts in systems of practice.Journal of School Leadership, 21(2), 166-189.Divaharan, S., & Ping, L. C. (2010). Secondary school socio-cultural context influencing ICTintegration: A case study approach. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(6), 741-763.Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.Psychological Review, 109, 573-598. doi:10.1037/0033- 295X.109.3.573Elg L. (2014). Innovations And New Technology - What Is The Role Of Research?Implications For Public Policy. Swedish Governmental Agency forInnovation SystemsFairfax Country Government. (2012). Overview of Sampling Procedures. Dimuat turun pada 21 Julai2016 daripada www.fairfaxcounty.gov/.../pdf/samplingprocedures.pdfFanimehan & Popoola (2013). Effects of career progression, work motivation and leadership styles onjob satisfaction of library personnel in the Federal Civil Service of Nigeria. Universiti Ibadan,Nigeria.Feras Mohammed Al-Madani & Ibrahim Ali Allaafiajiy (2014). Teachers’ Professional Development OnIct Use: A Saudi Sustainable Development Model. Proceeding of the Global Summit on Education GSE2014 (E- ISBN 978-967-11768-5-6) 4-5 March 2014, Kuala Lumpur, MALAYSIA.Filzah Zahilah Mohamad Zaki. (2013). ICT and Internet Usage In Early Childhood Education. AComparative Study of Australian and Malaysian Teacher’s Beliefs and Current Practices. Centre forLearning Innovation. Faculty of Education, Queensland University of Technology.Fowler. F., J., (2002). Survey Research Methods. Edisi ke-3. Applied Social ScienceResearch Method Series. Vol. 1. Sage Publication. Inc.Friesen, S., & Lock, J. (2012). Two high performing school jurisdictions in theapplication of 21st century learning. Prepared for the College of AlbertaSchool Superintendents (CASS).Fontana R. & Moriniello (2011). Technological leadership and innovation persistence: empiricalevidence. Dibentangkan di DRUID 2011.Gao, P., Wong, A. F. L., Choy, D., & Wu, J. (2010). Developing leadership potential for technologyintegration: Perspectives of three beginning teachers. Australasian Journal of EducationalTechnology, 26(5), 643-658.Gamal D. (2011) How To Measure Organization Innovations: An Overview of Innovation MeasurementFrameworks And Innovation Audit/ Management Tools. Teachnology Innovation and EntrepreneushipCenter.Ghavifekr, S., Hoon, A. L. S., Ling, H. F., & Ching, T. M. (2014). Heads Of Departments AsTransformational Leaders In Schools: Issues And Challenges. Malaysian Online Journal of EducationalManagement, 2(3).Glaslow P. A. (2005) Fundamentals of Survey Research Methodology.MP05W0000077. Mitre Product. Washington C3 Center McLean, Virginia.Gulbahar, Y. (2007). Technology planning: A roadmap to successful technology integration inschools, Computers & Education, 49(4), 943-956Gumusluoglu, L. and Ilsev, A. (2009) "Transformational leadership, creativity, and organizationalinnovation", Journal of Business Research, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 461-473.Hairulanuar Abd Samat (2013) Pengurusan Teknologi Maklumat Dan Komunikasi Di Sekolah Kebangsaan DanSekolah Rendah Jenis Kebangsaan Cina Di Daerah Muar, Johor. Tesis Sarjana. Universiti TeknologiMalaysia.Hassan Salleh Mahdi & Abdullah Sa’ad Al Dera (2013). The Impact of Teacher’s Age, Gender, andExperience on the use of Information and Communication Technology in EFL Teaching. English LanguageTeaching; Vol. 6, No. 6; 2013. ISSN 1916-4742Habib Mat Som & Syed Kamaruzaman Syed Ali (2011) . Komitmen Guru Dalam Pelaksanaan Kurikulum DanInovasi Berkesan. Masalah Pendidikan (34).Hadjithoma-Garstka, C. (2011). The role of the principal’s leadership style in the implementationof ICT policy. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(2), 311-326.Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate dataanalysis (7th ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice HallHair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). A Primer on Partial LeastSquares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Hanover (2013). Technology Integration Frameworks for the K-12 Curriculum.Dimuat turun di http://www.apsva.us/cms/lib2/VA01000586/Centricity/Domain/4511/Technology%20Integration%20Frameworks%20for%20the%20 K-12%20Curriculum.pdfHarris & Rea (2009). Web 2.0 and Virtual World Technologies: A Growing Impact on IS Education.Journal of Information Systems Education, Vol. 20(2). Dimuat turun daripadahttps://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/e5e9/6d93721a99e95dca 685f1c659f98bd8f88d7.pdfHemlin, S., Allwood, C. M., & Martin, B. R. (2008). Creative knowledge environments. CreativityResearch Journal, 20, 196-210.Higgins S., Xiao Z. & Katsipataki M., (2012). The Impact of Digital Technology on Learning: ASummary for the Education Endowment Foundation. Durham University.Honeycutt M. D. (2013). Examining The Effect of Leadership Practices On Sustaining A TechnologyInnovation. Dissertation Peper. Appalachian State UniversityHorth D. M. & Vehar J., (2014). Becoming a Leader Who Fosters Innovation. Center For CreativeLeadership.Hsieh C. C, Yen H. C., Kuan L. Y., (2014). The Relationship Among Principals’ TechnologyLeadership, Teaching Innovation, And Students’ Academic Optimism In Elementary SchoolsHussein Ahmad. (2014). Implementation Of Strategic Education Policy Plan At Micro-Level Contexts:Management And Leadership Challenges. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational.Idham A., Djatmiko, Rizky F. & Riski K.. (2013). Atribut Inovasi dan Tingkat Kecepatan Adopsi.Difusi Inovasi Pendidikan. 5/7/2013.International Society For Technology In Education (ISTE). (2009). Dimuat turun daripadawww.iste.org/docs/pdfs/20-14_ISTE_Standards-A_PDF.pdfJamal Ma’Mur Asmani, (2012). Panduan Memanfaatkan Teknologi Maklumat Dan Komunikasi Dalam DuniaPendidikan. PS Potensi Enterprise: Selangor.James W. Dearing (2007). Measurement of Innovation Attributes.http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:xUMyGNCN3PoJ:crn.hostworks.net/media/3399/innovation_attributes_measurement_2_.pdf+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&hl=en&ct=clnkJanardhanam, K., Sinha, R. and Babu, V.S. 2011. Adoption of new technology in B-School: An analytical study of Bangalore. Paper presented at InternationalConference of the Association for Technology and Business Management (CTBM-11), March 2011, Dubai:SZABIST. Dimuat turun daripada http://www.trikal.org/ictbm11/ProgrammeBulletin/Programme Bulletin.pdf.Jayson W. Richardson, Kevin Flora & Justin Bathon. (2013). Fostering a School Technology Vision inSchool Leaders. NCPEA International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, Vol. 8, No. 1-March 2013 ISSN: 2155-9635 © 2013Johari Hassan & Siti Norazlina Kamisan (2010). Halangan Terhadap Penggunaan Komputer Dan Ict DiDalam Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran (P&P) Di Kalangan Guru Di Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Luar Bandar Di Daerah Kulai Jaya, JohorJoseph Anjuman & Wan Rozali. (2013). Ict Dan Kelestarian Penggunaannya Dalam Pengajaran DanPembelajaran Geografi Di Sekolah. Seminar Pendidikan Sejarah dan Geografi 2013 (UMS, 29 - 30 Ogos2013)Kahirol M. S. & Nor L. S. (2013). Malaysia Leadership Competencies: A Model For EffectivePerformance. International Journal of Human Resource Management and Research (IJHRMR). ISSN2249-6874 Vol. 3, Issue 2, Jun 2013, 63-70Kang, M., & Kim, Y. (2016). A Desirable Direction for English Teachers ’ In-Service TrainingProgram in the Future, 122(Irtt), 37-41.Kannan, S., Sharma, S. & Abdullah, Z. (2012). Principal’s Strategies for Leading ICT Integration:The Malaysian Perspective. 2012. Vol.3, Supplement, 111-115, DOI:10.4236/ce.2012.38b023.Katz, I. R. and Macklin, A. S. (2007). Information and communication technology (ICT) literacy:Integration and assessment in higher education. Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 5(4),50-55.Kazi Enamul Hoque, Ahmad Zabidi Abd. Razak & Mosa Fatema Zohora. (2012). ICT Utilization amongSchool Teachers and Principals In Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research inProgressive Education and Development October 2012, Vol. 1, No. 4 ISSN: 2226-6348.Kember, D. (2008). Digital world, digital pedagogies: Reframing the learning landscape. Paperpresented at the Australian Computers in Education Conference (ACEC), Canberra, Australia.Kementerian Kewangan Malaysia. (2013). Bajet 2013. Kementerian Kewangan Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur.Percetakan Nasional Berhad.Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi (KPT). (2011). Blueprint on Enculturation of LifelongLearning for Malaysia 2011-2020. Malaysia: Univision Press.Kenneth C. A., (2013). The Impact of Organizational Structure and Leadership Styleson Innovation. ISSN: 2278-487X. Volume 6, Issue 6 (Jan. - Feb. 2013), PP 56-63.Kerlinger, F. N. (1986). Foundations of Behavioral Research. Edisi ke-2. New York: Holt, Rinehartand Winston.Khair (2013). Ucapan Ketua Pengarah Pelajaran Malaysia Sempena Perasmian Majlis Pelancaran LaporanTahunan 2015 Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025.Klein, K. J., Conn, A. B., & Sorra, J. S. (2001). Implementing computerized technology: Anorganization analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 811-824.Konstantinidis A., Theodosiadou D. & Pappos C. (2013). Web 2.0 Tools ForSupporting Teaching. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE October 2013 ISSN 1302-6488Volume: 14 Number: 4 Article 21Kotsemir A. dan Abroskin A. (2013). Innovation Concepts And Typology - An Evolutionary Discussion.(Series : Science, Technology And Innovation) WP BRP 05/STI/2013Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge?Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.Koenig, A. M., Eagly, A. H., Mitchell, A. A., & Ristikari, T. (2011). Are leader stereotypesmasculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 616-642.doi:10.1037/a0023557Kozloski, C. K. (2006). Principal Leadership For Technology Integra-tion: A Study Of PrincipalTechnology Leadership. PhD Thesis, Drexel University.KPM. (2012). Virtual Learning Environment. Dimuat turun dari (http://1bestarinet.net/?page_id=205) pada 2 Jun 2015.KPM (2013). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025 (Pendidikan Prasekolah hingga LepasMenengah). www.moe.gov.myKPM (2014). Elemen KBAT Dalam Kurikulum. Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum.ISBN 978-967-420-082-4Kowang T. O., Long C. S. & Rasli A. (2015). Innovation Management andPerformance Framework for Research University in Malaysia International Education Studies, Vol. 8,No. 6; 2015. Published by Canadian Center ofScience and Education.Lahkim M. & Draganova A., (2011). Integrating technology education withleadership development. Proceedings of the IETEC’11 Conference, KualaLumpur, Malaysia, Copyright © Mohammed Lahkim & Anrieta Draganova, 2011.Larson L., Miller T. & Ribble M.. (2010). 5 Considerations for Digital Age Leaders.Learning & Leading with Technology. ISTE. Dec/Jan 2009-10.Law, N., Pelgrum, W. J., & Plomp, T. (Eds.). (2008). Pedagogy and ICT use in schools around theworld: Findings from the IEA SITES 2006 study. Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre.Lawless, K., & Pellegrino, J. (2007). Professional development in integrating technology intoteaching and learning: Knowns, unknowns, and ways to pursue better questions and answers. Review ofEducational Research, 77 (4), 575-614.Leow F. T. & Neo M. (2013) Interactive Multimedia learning: Inovating Classroom Education InMalaysia University. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - April 2014, volume 13issue 2Levine J. B., Mosier G. & Perkins T. (2014). Perceptions of Teacher Leadership within the New TechHigh School Model. International Journal of Teacher Leadership. Volume 5, Number 1, Fall 2014.ISSN: 1934-9726Lim P. H. (2012). Current trends, innovations and issues in nursing education to cater for thebottom billion nurses. IeJSME 2012: 6 (Suppl 1): S69-S74Lim, C.-P., Zhao, Y., Tondeur, J., Chai, C.-S., & Tsai, C.-C. (2013). Bridging the Gap: TechnologyTrends and Use of Technology in Schools. Educational Technology & Society, 16 (2), 59-68.Livingstone, Sonia (2004). Media literacy and the challenge of new information and communicationtechnologies [online]. London: LSE Research Online. Dimuat turun daripadahttp://eprints.lse.ac.uk/1017Long, C. S., & Thean, L. Y. (2011). Relationship Between Leadership Style, Job Satisfaction andEmployees' Turnover Intention: A Literature Review. Research Journal of business management, 5(3).Manouselis, N., Kastrantas, K., Sanchez-Alonzo, S., Caceres, J., Ebner, H., Palmer, M., & Naeve, A.(2009). Architecture of the Organic.Edunet web portal. International Journal of Web Portals , 1(1), 71-91.Mansour, N., Alshamrani, S., Aldahmash, A., Alqudah, B. (2011). Perceived professional developmentneeds for Saudi Arabian science teachers. Dimuatturun daripada January 12, 2014 from www.esera.orh/media/.Maor D., (2013). Does the use of the TPACK model enhance digital pedagogies: Wedon’t understand the present so how can we imagine the future?. 30th Ascilite Conference, 1-4Disember 2013. Macquarie University, Sydney.Mahaliza Mansor. (2013). Pembinaan model pembelajaran profesional berasaskan sekolah di sekolahmenengah harian di Malaysia (Tesis Dr Falsafah) Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjung Malim,Perak.Marlen C. Jurisch, Markus Kautz, Petra Wolf, Helmut Krcmar (2015). An International Survey of theFactors Influencing the Intention to use Open Government. 2015 48th Hawaii International Conferenceon System SciencesMassey A. & Miller S. J., (2006). Tests of Hypotheses Using Statistics. Brown University. RI 02912.McCann C., Zuflacht S & Gillbert T. (2015). The Decade Plus. Teaching Career.How To Retain Effective Teacher Through Teacher Leadership. Teach Plus.McIntyre, L. J. (1999). Methodological issues in information systems survey research.Kertas pembentangan di ‘The Inforation Systems Research Challenge: Survey Research Methods.McLeod, S. & Richardson, J. W. (2011). The dearth of technology leadership coverage. Journal ofSchool Leadership, 21(2), 216-240.Metcalf W. B. (2012). K-12 Principals' Perceptions of Their Technology Leadership Preparedness.Electronic Theses & Dissertations. Paper 400.Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A framework forteacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017- 1054.Mohd Majid Konting. (1990). Kaedah Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.Mohd Arif Hj Ismail., Mohd Jasmy Abdul Rahman., & Rosnaini Mahmud. (2005).ICT in mastery education. Proceedings of Regional Education Seminar KualaLumpur, 1, 99-108.Mohd Azizul. (2011). Penggunaan Sistem E-Learning di Fakulti Pendidikan UTM. Tesis Sarjana Muda.Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, UTM. Dimuat turun darihttp://www.fp.utm.my/epusatsumber/pdffail/ptkghdfwP/AZIZOLAP050105T TP.pdfMorrison, G., & Lowther, D. (2010). Integrating computer technology into theclassroom: Skills for the 21st century (4th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson.Moshari J. (2013). Knowledge Management Issues in Malaysian Organizations: thePerceptions of Leaders. Journal of Knowledge Management, Economics andInformation Technology. Vol. III, Issue 5October 2013.Morten T. Hansen and Julian Birkinshaw (2007). The Innovation Value Chain.Harvard Business Review. Dimuat turun daripada www.hbrreprints.comMuhyiddin Yassin (2012) Pelan Strategik INTERIM. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia 2011-2020.Nordin A. Rahman, Fauziah A Wahab, Rohana Ismail and Norlina Udin (2013). A ComprehensiveInnovation Management Model for Malaysians Public Higher Learning Institutions. InternationalJournal of Software Engineering and Its Applications. Vol. 7, No. 1, January, 2013Nazari, Khosravi & Babalhavaeji (2013). Applying Rogers’ Diffusion of Innovation theory to theacceptance of online databases at University Zone of Iran. Malaysian Journal of Library &Information Science, Vol. 18, no. 3, 2013: 25-38Netragaonkar. Y. D (2015). Issues in ICT Education: Barriers, Problems and Role of Teachers in ICTEducation.Newhouse C., P. (2012). Effective School Leadership For Investment In ICT. ACEC2012: ITs TimeConference. October 2nd - 5th 2012, Perth Australia.NomsaMndzebele (2013). Challenges Faced by Schools when Introducing ICT in Developing Countries.International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention. www.ijhssi.org Volume 2 Issue 9.PP.01-04. ISSN (Online): 2319 - 7722.Noraini Mohamed Noh, Hani Merylina Ahmad Mustafa, Mahizer Hamzah, Mohd Arif Ismail & NorazilawatiAbdullah. (2013). Penggunaan Inovasi Teknologi Dalam Pengajaran: Cabaran Guru Dalam E-Pembelajaran.Proceedings of The 7th International Malaysian Educational Technology Convention (IMETC 2013).Bandung, Indonesia.Noraini Abdullah, Hamidon Khalid & Mohd. Izham Mohd. Hamzah. (2015). Amalan Kepimpinan TeknologiPengetua Dalam Pengintegrasian ICT di Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Di Malaysia. Proceeding of the3rd Global Summit on Education GSE 2015 (e-ISBN 978-967-0792-01-1), 9-10 March 2015, KualaLumpur, MALAYSIA.Ntemana T. J. & Olatokun W., (2012). Analyzing The Influence of Diffusion of Innovation AttributesOn Lecturer’s Attitudes Toward Information And Communication Technologies. An InterdisciplinaryJournal on Humans in ICTEnvironments. Volume 8(2). ms 179-197.Nurul Syuhada, (2017). Standard Guru Malaysia Dalam Program Persediaan Guru Reka Bentuk danTeknologi. Fakulti Pendidikan Teknikal dan Vokasional, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn.Oyaid, A. A. (2009). Education policy in Saudi Arabia and its relation to secondary schoolteachers’ ICT use, perceptions, and views of the future of ICT in education. Tesis PHD.Patrick, S. (2004). Toward a new golden age in American education: How the internet, the law andtoday’s students are revolutionizing expectations. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education,Office of Educational Technology.Papadakis V. & Bourantas D. (1998). The Ceo As Corporate Champion Of Technological Innovation: AnEmpirical Investigation. Dibentangkan di Technology Analysis and Strategic Management.Page-Jones, A. B. (2008). Leadership behavior and technology activities: The relationship betweenprincipals and technology use in schools. University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida.Picciano, A. G. (2011). Educational leadership and planning for technology (5th ed.).Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Punie & Cabrera (2006). The Future of ICT and Learning in the Knowledge Society.Report on a Joint DG JRC-DG EAC Workshop held in Seville, 20-21 October2005. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities ISBN 92-79-01902-3Pont B., Nusche D. dan Moorman H. (2008). Improving School Leadership . Volume1. Policy Ans Practice. OECD Publications.Psotka, J. (2013). Educational Games and Virtual Reality as Disruptive Technologies.Educational Technology & Society, 16 (2), 69-80.Qhamariah Samu (2012). Pembentukan Model Keberkesanan Pengintegrasian Teknologi Dalam Pengajarandan Pembelajaran di Sekolah Rendah Malaysia. Universiti Malaya. Tesis Ijazah Doktor Falsafah.Raman, A., Don, Y. & Kasim, A. L. (2014). The Relationship Between Principals Technology Leadershipand Teacher’s Technology Use In Malaysian Secondary Schools. Asian Social Science; Vol. 10, No. 18;ISSN 1911-2017. Published by Canadian Center of Science and EducationRancangan Malaysia Ke-6 (1990-1995). Dimuat turun daripadahttp://www.pmo.gov.my/dokumenattached/RMK/RM6.pdfRancangan Malaysia Kesebelas (2015). Rancangan Malaysia Kesebelas 2016-2020.Percetakan Nasional Malaysia Berhad. Kuala Lumpur.Reeves, D. B. (2009). Leading change in your school: How to conquer myths, buildcommitment, and get results. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.Richardson, W. & Mancabelli, R. (2011). Personal learning networks: Using the power of connectionsto transform education. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.Rivard, L. R. (2010). Enhancing education through technology: Principal leadership for technologyintegration in schools. (Doctoral dissertation). UMI Dissertation Publishing database.Robinson, V. (2010). From instructional leadership to leadership capabilities: Empirical findingsand methodological challenges. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 9(1), 1-26.doi:10.1080/15700760903026748Rogers, E.M. and Shoemaker, F.F. (1900) Communication of innovations: A cross- cultural approach(2nd ed. of Diffusion of innovations). Translated by Ezatallah Karami and Abotaleb Fanaei. Shiraz:Shiraz Press.Rogers, E.M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th edition). The Free Press. New York. Dimuat turundaripada http://www.d.umn.edu/~lrochfor/ireland/dif-of- in-ch06.pdfRogers, E.M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.Rojas D. Z. (2014). A procedure to prevent differences in translated survey items using SQP. RECSMWorking Paper Number 38. Dimuat turun daripada http://www.upf.edu/survey/_pdf/RECSM_wp038.pdfRosette, A. S., & Tost, L. P. (2010). Agentic women and communal leadership: How role prescriptionsconfer advantage to top women leaders. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 221-235. doi:10.1037/a0018204Rosnaini Mahmud & Mohd Arif (2010) Impact of Training and Experience in Using ICT On in-ServiceTeachers’ Basic ICT Literacy. Malaysian Journal of Educational Technology Volume 10, Number 2,December 2010.Ross A. Perkins (2017). Using Rogers’ Theory of Perceived Attributes as a Framework forUnderstanding the Challenges of Adoption of Open Educational Resources. International Journal ofHumanities and Social Science. Vol. 1 No. 18Rushby, N. (2013). The Future of Learning Technology: Some Tentative Predictions.Educational Technology & Society, 16 (2), 52-58.Educational Technology & Society, 16 (2), 52-58.Richardson John T. E. (2011). Eta Squared and Partial Eta Squared As Measures ofEffect Size In Eductional Research. Edisi 6, Isu 2, m.s 135-147.Ritter-Hayashi, Patrick Vermeulen & Joris Knoben (2016). Gender Diversity and Innovation: The Roleof Women’s Economic Opportunity in Developing Countries. Creating knowledge for society. Nijmegen,August 2016Samancioglu M., Baglibel M., Kalman M. & Sincar M., (2015). The Relationship between TechnologyLeadership Roles and Profiles of School Principals and Technology Integration in Primary SchoolClassrooms. Journal of Educational Research Sciences Research. International E-Journal. Vol. 5. No.2.Sathiamoorthy Kannan, Sailesh Sharma, Zuraidah Abdullah (2012). Principals Strategies for LeadingICT Integration ; The Malaysian Perspective. 2012. Vol.3, Supplement, 111-115Saud A. (2012). The Effect of Transformational Leadership on Follower’s Creativity AndOrganisational Innovation in Public Sector. Brunel Business School - Doctoral Symposium 27th & 28thMarch 2012.Samantha C., Lisa Slattery & David J., (2014). Gender and Perceptions of Leadership Effectiveness;A Meta-Analysis of Contextual Moderators. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2014, Vol. 99, No. 6,1129-1145Sajap Maswan (2009). Perkembangan Internet dan Kesannya di dalam Sistem Pendidikan di Malaysia.Dimuat turun daripada http://sajadstudio.info/artikal/perkemb%20inter.pdfSawang S. (2008). Innovation Implementation Effectiveness. A Multiorganizational Test Of Klein ConnAnd Sorra’s Model. School of Management Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane Australia.Schmidt D. A., Baran E., Thompson A. D., Mishra P., Koehlar M. J. & Shin T. S., (2009).Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK): The Development and Validation of anAssessment Instrument for Preservice Teachers. JRTE, 42(2), 123-149. ISTE (International Societyfor Technology in Education)Schleicher, A. (2012), Ed., Preparing Teachers and Developing School Leaders for the 21st Century:Lessons from around the World, OECD Publishing.Scott G. & Hans J. (2011) Creative Climate:A Leadership Lever for Innovation.Volume 45 Number 3 Third Quarter 2011 . Dimuat turun daripadahttps://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/26a9/5a18ad09fd3998263104a482a3d0081971a8.pdfSchrum, L., & Levin, B. (2013). Lessons learned from exemplary schools.Techtrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 57(1), 38-42.doi:10.1007/s11528-012-0629-6Selwyn, N. (2011) Editorial: In praise of pessimism—the need for negativity in educationaltechnology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(5), 713-718.Shamsuddin Hassan (2010). Integrating ICT In Teaching and Learning. Country Report : Malaysia.Bahagian Teknologi Pendidikan, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.Sheaskin., D. (2007). Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures (4th ed.)Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall.Simen Ghavifekr, Ahmad Zabidi Abd Razak, Muhammad Faizal A. Ghani, Ng Yan Ran, Yao Meixi & ZhangTengyue. (2013). ICT in integration In Education : Incorporation for Teaching & LearningImprovement. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology (MOJET). Volume 2.Issue 2.Grant research BK034-2013 from University Malaya.Siti Fatimah Ahmad & Ab. Halim Tamuri (2010). Persepsi Guru Terhadap Penggunaan Bahan BantuMengajar Berasaskan Teknologi Multimedia dalam Pengajaran j-QAF. Journal of Islamic and ArabicEducation 2(2), 2010 m/s 53-64. Dimuat turun daripada http://www.ukm.my/jiae/pdf/20.pdfJemaah Nazir dan Jaminan Kualiti, (2016). Standard Kualiti Pendidikan Malaysia Gelombang Kedua.Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.Sheskin D. J. (2007) Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures. 4th Edition,Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton.Shattuck G. (2010). Understanding School Leaders’ Role in Teachers’ Adoption of TechnologyIntegration Classroom Practices. e-mail: shattuck.gary@newton.k12.ga.usSosik, J.J. and Megerian, L.E. (1999) "Understanding Leader Emotional Intelligence and Performance:The Role of Self-Other Agreement on Transformational Leadership Perceptions", Group andOrganization Management, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 367-390.Sosik JJ, Kahai SS, Avolio BJ (1998). Transformational Leadership and Dimensions of Creativity:Motivating Idea Generation in Computer- Mediated Groups. Creativity Res. J. 11(2): 111-121.Stockham M. & Collins H., (2012). Information Literacy Skills for Preservice Teachers: Do TheyTransfer to K-12 Classrooms?. Education Libraries,Volume 35, Number 1-2, Summer-Winter 2012Strohmeyer, Robert. & Tonoyan, Vartuhi. 2005. Bridging the Gender gap inEmployment Growth. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship andInnovation Vol. 6 No. 4 pp.259-273.Summer. (2011). Stratified Random Sampling Example. Forest Measurement II. Dimuat turun daripadawww2.latech.edu/.../T4_StratifiedExample.pdf pada 21 Julai 2016.Supian Hashim & Khadijah Daud (2014) Amalan Kepimpinan Lestari Dan Hubungannya Dengan PrestasiKerja Guru Sekolah Rendah Yang Menerima Tawaran Baru di Daerah Segamat.Surendran Sankaran & Norazlinda Saad. (2014). Kerumitan Teknologi Dengan Pengintegrasian PerisianKursus Interaktif di SMK Harian. International Conference on Postgraduate Research 2014 (ICPR2014). Dimuat turun dari http://www.kuis.edu.my/icpr2014/eproceedings/33.%20Dr.%20Surendran%20Sankaran%20.pdfTalip R. (2012). Guru Sebagai Agen Transformasi Dalam Inovasi Kurikulum. Minda Pendidik. BeritaHarian. 25.04.2012.Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell L. S. (1996). Using Multivariate Statistic. New York: Harper dan Row.Teacher Leadership Exploritory Consortium (TLEC), (2008). Teacher Leader Model Standards.Thang Siew Ming, Carol Hall, Hazita Azman dan Gordon Joyes (2010). Supporting Smart SchoolTeachers’ Continuing Professional Developmentin and through ICT: A model for change. InternationalJournal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT),2010, Vol. 6, Issue 2, pp. 5 20Thoonan, E. E. J., Sleegers, P. J. C., Oort, F. J., Peetsma, T. T. D., & Geijsel, F. P. (2011). Hoeto improve teaching practices: The role of teacher motivation, organizational factors andleadership practices. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(3), 496-536.Tinio, V. L. (2003). ICT in Education. E-Primers for the Information Economy, Society and Polity.Manila: E-ASEAN Task Force/UNDP-APDIP. Dimuat turun dari http:www.apdip.net/publications/iespprimers/ICTinEducation.pdfTurel, Y. K., & Johnson, T. E. (2012). Teachers' Belief and Use of InteractiveWhiteboards for Teaching and Learning. Educational Technology & Society, 15 (1), 381-394.Vekiri, I. (2010) 'Boys' and girls' ICT beliefs: Do teachers matter?', Computers andEducation, no. 55, pp. 16-23.Virginia Department of Education (VDOE) Division of Technology. (2010).Educational Technology Plan for Virginia: 2010-2015. Richmond, VA:Author. Dimuat turun daripada http://www.doe.virginia.gov/support/technology/edtech_plan/plan.pdf.Wiggers, R., & Arnold, C. (2011). Defining, measuring and achieving "student success" in Ontariocolleges and universities. Toronto: Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario.Xie, J., Sreenivasan, S., Komiss, G., Zhang, W., Lim, C., & Szymanski, B. K. (2011).Social consensus through the influence of committed minorities. Physical Review E, 84 (1),011130. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.84.011130Yukselturk, E., & Bulut, S. (2009). Gender differences in self-regulated online learningenvironment. Journal of Educational Technology & Society , vo1.2, no.3, pp. 12- 22Zainudin Awang. (2015). SEM Made Simple. A Gentle Approach to Learning Structural EquationModeling. MPWS Rich Publication Sdn. Bhd.. Selangor.Zuljan M. V., & Vogrinc J. (2010). Facilitating Effective Student Learning through Teacher ResearchAnd Innovation. Faculty of Education ISBN 978-961-253-051-8

Similar Items