Hubungan kepimpinan distributif guru besar wanita dengan komitmen guru di sekolah-sekolah wilayah Keramat Kuala Lumpur
Kajian ini bertujuan mengkaji hubungan kepimpinan distributif guru besar wanita dengankomitmen guru di sekolah-sekolah rendah Wilayah Keramat, Kuala Lumpur. Kajian ini menggunakaninstrumen Distributed Leadership Inventory (DLI) dan Organizational Commitment Questionnaire (OCQ).Kajian berbentuk tinja...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | thesis |
Language: | zsm |
Published: |
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5072 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:5072 |
---|---|
record_format |
uketd_dc |
institution |
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
collection |
UPSI Digital Repository |
language |
zsm |
topic |
HM Sociology |
spellingShingle |
HM Sociology Nordiana Khalid Hubungan kepimpinan distributif guru besar wanita dengan komitmen guru di sekolah-sekolah wilayah Keramat Kuala Lumpur |
description |
Kajian ini bertujuan mengkaji hubungan kepimpinan distributif guru besar wanita dengankomitmen guru di sekolah-sekolah rendah Wilayah Keramat, Kuala Lumpur. Kajian ini menggunakaninstrumen Distributed Leadership Inventory (DLI) dan Organizational Commitment Questionnaire (OCQ).Kajian berbentuk tinjauan ini dijalankan dengan menggunakan soal selidik yang melibatkan seramai301 orang guru daripada sembilan buah sekolah rendah yang telah dipilih. Data dianalisis denganmenggunakan kaedah statistik deskriptif dan statistik inferens. Dapatan kajian secara keseluruhanmenjelaskan hubungan amalan kepimpinan distributif guru besar wanita dan komitmen guru di WilayahKeramat adalah pada tahap lemah, r(301) = 0.340, p < 0.05. Kajian juga menunjukkan tidak terdapatperbezaan yang signifikan antara komitmen guru berdasarkan faktor jantina, t(301) = 1.693, p >0.05, umur, F(3, 301) = 0.793, p = 0.499 dan tahap pendidikan, F(3, 301) = 2.613, p = 0.051. Walaubagaimanapun, dapatan kajian menunjukkan wujud perbezaan yang signifikan antara komitmen gurudengan pengalaman mengajar, F(4, 301) = 3.992, p = 0.004. Kesimpulan kajian ini menunjukkan amalankepimpinan distributif guru besar wanita mempunyai hubungan yang positif dengan komitmen guru.Implikasi kajian ini menunjukkan amalan kepimpinan distributif yang mantap dan berkesan oleh gurubesar wanita dapat meningkatkan komitmen guru disekolah. |
format |
thesis |
qualification_name |
|
qualification_level |
Master's degree |
author |
Nordiana Khalid |
author_facet |
Nordiana Khalid |
author_sort |
Nordiana Khalid |
title |
Hubungan kepimpinan distributif guru besar wanita dengan komitmen guru di sekolah-sekolah wilayah Keramat Kuala Lumpur |
title_short |
Hubungan kepimpinan distributif guru besar wanita dengan komitmen guru di sekolah-sekolah wilayah Keramat Kuala Lumpur |
title_full |
Hubungan kepimpinan distributif guru besar wanita dengan komitmen guru di sekolah-sekolah wilayah Keramat Kuala Lumpur |
title_fullStr |
Hubungan kepimpinan distributif guru besar wanita dengan komitmen guru di sekolah-sekolah wilayah Keramat Kuala Lumpur |
title_full_unstemmed |
Hubungan kepimpinan distributif guru besar wanita dengan komitmen guru di sekolah-sekolah wilayah Keramat Kuala Lumpur |
title_sort |
hubungan kepimpinan distributif guru besar wanita dengan komitmen guru di sekolah-sekolah wilayah keramat kuala lumpur |
granting_institution |
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
granting_department |
Fakulti Pengurusan dan Ekonomi |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5072 |
_version_ |
1747833162975674368 |
spelling |
oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:50722020-08-05 Hubungan kepimpinan distributif guru besar wanita dengan komitmen guru di sekolah-sekolah wilayah Keramat Kuala Lumpur 2018 Nordiana Khalid HM Sociology Kajian ini bertujuan mengkaji hubungan kepimpinan distributif guru besar wanita dengankomitmen guru di sekolah-sekolah rendah Wilayah Keramat, Kuala Lumpur. Kajian ini menggunakaninstrumen Distributed Leadership Inventory (DLI) dan Organizational Commitment Questionnaire (OCQ).Kajian berbentuk tinjauan ini dijalankan dengan menggunakan soal selidik yang melibatkan seramai301 orang guru daripada sembilan buah sekolah rendah yang telah dipilih. Data dianalisis denganmenggunakan kaedah statistik deskriptif dan statistik inferens. Dapatan kajian secara keseluruhanmenjelaskan hubungan amalan kepimpinan distributif guru besar wanita dan komitmen guru di WilayahKeramat adalah pada tahap lemah, r(301) = 0.340, p < 0.05. Kajian juga menunjukkan tidak terdapatperbezaan yang signifikan antara komitmen guru berdasarkan faktor jantina, t(301) = 1.693, p >0.05, umur, F(3, 301) = 0.793, p = 0.499 dan tahap pendidikan, F(3, 301) = 2.613, p = 0.051. Walaubagaimanapun, dapatan kajian menunjukkan wujud perbezaan yang signifikan antara komitmen gurudengan pengalaman mengajar, F(4, 301) = 3.992, p = 0.004. Kesimpulan kajian ini menunjukkan amalankepimpinan distributif guru besar wanita mempunyai hubungan yang positif dengan komitmen guru.Implikasi kajian ini menunjukkan amalan kepimpinan distributif yang mantap dan berkesan oleh gurubesar wanita dapat meningkatkan komitmen guru disekolah. 2018 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5072 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5072 text zsm closedAccess Masters Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Pengurusan dan Ekonomi Abdul Ghaffar Mahmud (2010). Mencetus kegemilangan melalui kepimpinancemerlang. Kertas pembentangan di Seminar Nasional Pengurusan dan Kepimpinan Pendidikan Ke17, Institut Aminuddin Baki.Abdul Razak Abdul Majid (2007). Persepsi guru terhadap gaya kepimpinan pengetua sekolah satu kajiandi daerah Rompin. Selangor: Fakulti Pendidikan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.Abdul Shukor Abdullah (2004). Kepimpinan unggul tonggak pengurusan pendidikan cemerlang. JurnalPengurusan dan Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 14 (1), 18-30.Abdullah Sani Yahya, Abdul Rashid Mohamed & Abdul Ghani Abdullah (2007).Guru sebagai pemimpin. Kuala Lumpur: PTS Profesional.Ainon Mohammad (2003). Bagaimana hendak mendorong semangat kerja: Panduan meningkatkan dedikasi danproduktiviti orang-orang bawahan. Kuala Lumpur: PTS Publications and Distributors Sdn.Bhd.Allen, N.J. & Meyer, J.P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance andnormative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1-18.Allen, N.J. & Meyer, J.P. (1996). Affective, continuance and normative commitment to theorganization: An examination of construct validity. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 49 (3),252-276.Amin Senin, Rosnarizah Abdul Halim & Rohaya Hassan (2007). The aspiring headteacher performance inleadership and management assessment. Kertas pembentangan di Seminar Nasional Pengurusan danKepimpinan Pendidikan Ke 14, Institut Aminuddin Baki.Angelle, P.S. (2010). An organizational perspective of distributed leadership: A portrait of amiddle school. National Middle School Association, 33(5).Astin, A.W. and Astin, H.S. (2000). Leadership reconsidered: Engaging higher education in socialchange. Los Angeles: University of California.Azizi Yahaya, Noordin Yahaya, Kamariah Arshad, Jasmi Ismail, Saini Jaalam & Zurihanmi Zakariya(2009). Occupational stress and its effects towards the organization management. Journal of SocialSciences, 5(4), 390-397.Belhiah, H. (2007). Toward a new conceptualization of teacher leadership in Morroccan schools. Proceedings of the Mate 27th Annual nationalconference.Bennet, N., Wise, C.,Woods, P. and Harvey, J. A. (2003). Distributed leadership. Fullreport. Spring, 2003, National College for School Leadership.Bolden, R. (2011). Distributed leadership in organisations: A Review of Theory andResearch. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13, 251-269.Bordens, K.S. & Abbott, B.B. (2008). Research design and methods: A processapproach (7th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.Boris-Schater, S. & Langer, S. (2003). Balanced leadership: How effective principalsmanage their work (critical issues in educational leadership). USA:Teachers Collage Press.Chua Y.P. (2006). Kaedah penyelidikan. Shah Alam: McGraw Hill Education.Chong Chung Poh (2014). Hubungan di antara kepimpinan distributif pengetuadengan kepuasan kerja guru. Selangor: Universiti Putra Malaysia.Coakes, S.J., Steed, L., & Dzidic, P. (2010). SPSS version 17.0 for windows: Analysiswithout anguish. Sydney: John Wiley & Son Australia, Ltd.Creswell, J.W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among fiveapproaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.Danielson, C. (2007). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching.ASCD.Day, C., Sammons, P., Hopkins, D., Harris, A., Leithwood, K., Qing, G., Brown, E.,Atharidou, E., Kington, A. (2009). The impact of school leadership on pupiloutcomes: Final Report. Nottingham: Department for Children, Schools andFamilies.Dinham, S., Aubusson, P. and Brady, L. (2006). Distributive leadership throughaction learning. Australian Centre for Educational Leadership 5thInternational Educational Leadership Conference.Eagly, A.H. & Johnson, B.T. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis.Psychological Bulletin, 108 (2), 233-256.Elmore, R.F. (2002). Hard questions about practice. Educational Leadership, 59 (8),Retrieved November 29, 2003 from Academic Search Elite database.Fauzi, H., Jamal, A., & Mohd Saifoul Zamzuri, N. (2016). Kaedah Penyelidikan DanAnalisis Data SPSS (4th ed.). Sintok: UUM Press.Fullan, M. (2007). The Josey-Bass Rer On Educational Leadership, (2nd ed.). SanFrancisco: Jossey - BassGay, L.R., and Airasian, P. (2003). Educational research: Competencies for analysisand application (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.Gronn, P. (2000). Distributed properties: A new architecture for leadership.Educational Management and Administration, 28 (3), 317 - 338.Gronn, P. (2008). The future of distributed leadership. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(2), 141-158.Hair, J.F, Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. and Black, W. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. (5thed.). (Upper Sadd) Prentice Hall.Harris, A. (2002). Building the capacity for school improvement. Paper presented at The AmericanResearch Association Conference, New Orleans.Harris, A. (2004). Distributed leadership and school improvement: Leading or misleading.Educational Management Administration & Leadership. London: SAGE Publication.Harris, A. and Spillane, J. (2008). Distributed leadership according to the evidence.Journal of Educational Administration. Distributed leadership through the looking glass, 46(2),172-188.Harris, A. (2014). Distributed Leadership Matters: Perspective, Practicalities, and Potential.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.Hartley, D. (2007). The emergence of distributed leadership in education: Why now?British Journal of Education Studies, 55, 202-214.Hasnita Abdul Malek (2010). Hubungan antara stail kepimpinan pengetua dan komitmen guru. KualaLumpur: Institut Pengajian Kepengetuaan Universiti Malaya.Hoy, W.K. & Miskel, C.G. (2008). Educational administration: Theory, research and practice, (8thed.). Bostan: McGraw Hill.Hulpia, H. & Devos, G.G. (2009). Exploring the link between distributed leadership and jobsatisfaction of school leaders. Educational Studies, 35(2), 153 - 171.Hulpia, H., Devos, G., & Roseel, Y. (2009). The relationship between the perception of distributedleadership in secondary school and teachers’ and teacher leaders’ job satisfaction andorganizational commitment. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 20(3), 291-317.Hussein Ahmad (2012). Mission of public education in Malaysia: The challenge of transformation.Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya Press.Ibrahim Mamat (1998). Pengetua sekolah menangani isu dan cabaran kepimpinan.Kuala Lumpur: Kumpulan Budiman Sdn. Bhd.Jamaliah Abdul Hamid & Norhannan Ramli (2006). Gaya kepimpinan pengetuawanita dan hubungannya dengan tahap motivasi guru sekolah menengah.Jurnal Pendidikan 31 (2006) 53-69.Jamalulail, A.W., Aida Hanim, A.H., Suriati, Z dan Md Fuad, M.R. (2013). The relationship betweenheadteacher’s distributed leadership practices and teachers’ and teachers’ motivation in nationalprimary schools. Asian Social Science (9,16).Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (2013). Pelan Induk Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025.Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.Krejcie, R.V. & Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educationaland Phychological Measurement, 30.608.Kouzes, J. & Posner, B (2003). The leadership challenge. San Francisco.Leithwood, Mascall, B., Strauss, T., Sacks., R., N., M., & Yakashina, A. (2007).Distributing leadership to make school smarter. Taking the ego out of the system Leadership andPolicy in Schools, 6(1), 37-67.Lokman Mohd Tahir, Hamdan Said, Rosni Zamuddin Shah Sidek, M. Al-Muzammil Yassin dan Sanitah MohdYusof (2008). Analisis kepimpinan pengetua sekolah menengah di Johor. Research Vote No: 78279,Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.MacBeath, J. (2005). Leadership as distributed: A matter of practice. School leadership andmanagement, 25(45), 349-362.Mohd Majid, K. (2005). Kaedah Penyelidikan (Edisi Ketujuh). Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.Mowday, R.T., Steers, R.M. & Porter, L.W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment.Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 14,224-247.Mowday, R.T., Porter, L.W. & Steers, R.M. (1982). Employee-organization linkages: The psychology ofcommitment, absenteeism, and turnover. New York: Academic Press.Munyrrah Sabyttah Yaccob (2015). Hubungan antara kepuasan kerja guru dengan komitmen terhadaporganisasi di sekolah kebangsaan zon Kuala Pegang, Baling Kedah. Kedah: Universiti Utara Malaysia.Norhannan Ramli & Jamaliah Abdul Hamid (2006). Gaya kepimpinan pengetua wanita dan hubungannyadengan tahap motivasi guru sekolah menengah.Jurnal Pendidikan 31 (2006) 53-69.Norhayati Ramlan (2011). Kepimpinan distributif seorang pengetua di sebuahsekolah premier di daerah Kelang, Selangor. Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Malaya.Normala Shamsuddin (2011). Gaya kepimpinan guru besar wanita dan hubungannya dengan komitmen gurudi sekolah. Johor: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.Nurulaim Asyikin Zakaria & Suhaida Abdul Kadir (2013). Kepimpinan distributif sekolah menengah didaerah Kangar, Perlis. Jurnal Seminar Pasca Siswazah Dalam Pendidikan (GREDUC 2013).Oduro, G. K. T. (2004). Distributed leadership in schools: What English teacher say about the‘pull’ and ‘push’ factors. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association AnnualConference University of Manchester.Pallant, J. (2010). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS (4thed). Maidenhead: Open University Press/Mc Graw-Hill.Porter, L.W. & Smith, F.J. (1970). The etiology of organizational commitment.Unpublished manuscript University of California at Irvine.PPPM. (2013). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025. Putrajaya: Kementerian PendidikanMalaysia.Prisca Ansilmus@Anselmus (2009). Gaya kepimpinan pengetua wanita dan hubungannya dengan motivasiguru sekolah menengah. Sabah: Universiti Malaysia Sabah.Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLP. (2007). Independent study into school leadership.Nottingham: DfES Publications.Rosnarizah Abdul Halim & Zulkifli Abdul Manaf (2009). Kajian eksplorasi distributed leadership diMalaysia. Kertas Seminar Nasional Pengurusan dan Kepimpinan Pendidikan ke 16. Anjuran InstitutAminuddin Baki, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia 21 - 24 Julai.Sapora Sipon, Justina Esther Gubud (2010). Gaya kepimpinan pengetua dengan kepuasan kerja guru.Prosiding Seminar Profesion Perguruan, USIM. Diperolehi Julai 28, 2010 daripadahttp://ddms.edu.my/handle/123456789/2689.Sekaran, U. (2003). Research method for business. San Francisco: John Wiley and Sons.Siva a/l Rabindarang (2014). Kepimpinan distributif, komitmen organisasi dan tekanan kerja di KolejVokasional, Malaysia. Perak: Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.Spillane, J.P. (2005). Distributed leadership. The Educational Forum, 69(2), 143-150.Spillane, J.P. & Sherer, J.Z. (2004). A Distributed Perspective on School Leadership:Leadership practice as stretched over people and place. Paper presented at the annual meeting ofthe America Education Association, San Diego, CA.Spillane, J.P. (2006). Distributed leadership. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.Williams, C.G. (2011). Distributed leadership in South African schools: Possibilities andconstraints. South African Journal of Education, 31, 190-200.Yahya Don (2005). Kepimpinan pendidikan di Malaysia. PTS Profesional Publishing Sdn.Bhd.Yulk, G. (2006). Leadership in organization (6th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Zainudin, Awang (2012). Structural equation modeling using amos graphic. ShahAlam: Universiti Teknologi MARA Publication Centre (UPENA) |