Pembinaan dan penentusahan instrumen ujian subjektif kemahiran proses sains asas dan bersepadu sekolah rendah

Kajian ini bertujuan untuk membina dan menentusahkan instrumen ujian subjektifyang dinamakan Ujian Subjektif Kemahiran Proses Sains Asas dan Bersepadu(USKPSAB) untuk sekolah rendah bagi mengukur penguasaan kesemua 12 kemahiranproses sains. Kajian ini menggunakan gabungan dua fasa. Fasa pertama melib...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Shaliny Panneir Selvam
Format:	thesis
Language:	zsm
Published:	2019
Subjects:	Q Science
Online Access:	https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5206
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:5206
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
collection	UPSI Digital Repository
language	zsm
topic	Q Science
spellingShingle	Q Science Shaliny Panneir Selvam Pembinaan dan penentusahan instrumen ujian subjektif kemahiran proses sains asas dan bersepadu sekolah rendah
description	Kajian ini bertujuan untuk membina dan menentusahkan instrumen ujian subjektifyang dinamakan Ujian Subjektif Kemahiran Proses Sains Asas dan Bersepadu(USKPSAB) untuk sekolah rendah bagi mengukur penguasaan kesemua 12 kemahiranproses sains. Kajian ini menggunakan gabungan dua fasa. Fasa pertama melibatkanpembinaan item instrumen yang mana item soalan subjektif ditulis berdasarkan jadualspesifikasi item. Kesahan kandungan, kesahan muka dan pilihan jawapanditentusahkan secara kualitatif oleh panel pakar. Fasa kedua pula melibatkanpenentusahan aspek psikometrik instrumen melalui data kajian yang menggunakan216 murid Tahun 4 hingga Tahun 6. Jumlah skor ujian yang diperolehi oleh muridsemasa ujian rintis yang melibatkan 153 item ialah 63 hingga 150 (min = 119.4,sisihan piawai = 13.1) dengan nilai pekali kebolehpercayaan KR-20 ialah 0.84.Instrumen kemahiran proses sains yang terhasil mengandungi 75 item: 42 itemkemahiran proses sains asas (dengan min = 155.27, sisihan piawai = 13.0 dan nilaikebolehpercayaan KR-20 iaitu 0.77) dan 33 item kemahiran proses sains bersepadu(dengan min = 142.92, sisihan piawai = 26.9 dan nilai kebolehpercayaan KR-20 iaitu0.51). Min indeks kesukaran item ialah 0.36 dengan julat antara 0.25 hingga 0.75,manakala min indeks diskriminasi item pula 0.40 dengan julat antara 0.40 hingga0.51. Kajian ini telah menghasilkan satu instrumen kemahiran proses sains yang sahdan boleh dipercayai serta sesuai untuk menentukan tahap penguasaan kemahiranproses sains asas dan bersepadu dalam pembelajaran sains di sekolah rendah.
format	thesis
qualification_name
qualification_level	Master's degree
author	Shaliny Panneir Selvam
author_facet	Shaliny Panneir Selvam
author_sort	Shaliny Panneir Selvam
title	Pembinaan dan penentusahan instrumen ujian subjektif kemahiran proses sains asas dan bersepadu sekolah rendah
title_short	Pembinaan dan penentusahan instrumen ujian subjektif kemahiran proses sains asas dan bersepadu sekolah rendah
title_full	Pembinaan dan penentusahan instrumen ujian subjektif kemahiran proses sains asas dan bersepadu sekolah rendah
title_fullStr	Pembinaan dan penentusahan instrumen ujian subjektif kemahiran proses sains asas dan bersepadu sekolah rendah
title_full_unstemmed	Pembinaan dan penentusahan instrumen ujian subjektif kemahiran proses sains asas dan bersepadu sekolah rendah
title_sort	pembinaan dan penentusahan instrumen ujian subjektif kemahiran proses sains asas dan bersepadu sekolah rendah
granting_institution	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
granting_department	Fakulti Pembangunan Manusia
publishDate	2019
url	https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5206
_version_	1747833170723602432
spelling	oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:52062020-09-08 Pembinaan dan penentusahan instrumen ujian subjektif kemahiran proses sains asas dan bersepadu sekolah rendah 2019 Shaliny Panneir Selvam Q Science Kajian ini bertujuan untuk membina dan menentusahkan instrumen ujian subjektifyang dinamakan Ujian Subjektif Kemahiran Proses Sains Asas dan Bersepadu(USKPSAB) untuk sekolah rendah bagi mengukur penguasaan kesemua 12 kemahiranproses sains. Kajian ini menggunakan gabungan dua fasa. Fasa pertama melibatkanpembinaan item instrumen yang mana item soalan subjektif ditulis berdasarkan jadualspesifikasi item. Kesahan kandungan, kesahan muka dan pilihan jawapanditentusahkan secara kualitatif oleh panel pakar. Fasa kedua pula melibatkanpenentusahan aspek psikometrik instrumen melalui data kajian yang menggunakan216 murid Tahun 4 hingga Tahun 6. Jumlah skor ujian yang diperolehi oleh muridsemasa ujian rintis yang melibatkan 153 item ialah 63 hingga 150 (min = 119.4,sisihan piawai = 13.1) dengan nilai pekali kebolehpercayaan KR-20 ialah 0.84.Instrumen kemahiran proses sains yang terhasil mengandungi 75 item: 42 itemkemahiran proses sains asas (dengan min = 155.27, sisihan piawai = 13.0 dan nilaikebolehpercayaan KR-20 iaitu 0.77) dan 33 item kemahiran proses sains bersepadu(dengan min = 142.92, sisihan piawai = 26.9 dan nilai kebolehpercayaan KR-20 iaitu0.51). Min indeks kesukaran item ialah 0.36 dengan julat antara 0.25 hingga 0.75,manakala min indeks diskriminasi item pula 0.40 dengan julat antara 0.40 hingga0.51. Kajian ini telah menghasilkan satu instrumen kemahiran proses sains yang sahdan boleh dipercayai serta sesuai untuk menentukan tahap penguasaan kemahiranproses sains asas dan bersepadu dalam pembelajaran sains di sekolah rendah. 2019 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5206 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5206 text zsm closedAccess Masters Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Pembangunan Manusia Abdul Rahim Hamdan & Saliza Ahmad (2008). Tahap Penguasaan Guru dalamMelaksanakan Pentaksiran Kerja Amali (PEKA) Sains Menengah Rendah.Dibentangkan dalam Seminar Kebangsaan Pendidikan Sains dan Matematik.Diakses dari http://eprints.utm.my/7674/1/P30.pdf pada 20 November 2017.Abruscato, J. (2004). Teaching Children Science: A Discovery Approach. New York :Allyn & Bacon.Ahmad, D.W. (2013). Determining Sample Size For Research Activities. Educationaland Psychological Measurement. 30, 608Alias, M. (2011). Pelaksanaan Pentaksiran Amali Sains Berdasarkan Sekolah diBeberapa Buah Sekolah Menengah Daerah Hilir Perak. Tesis SarjanaPendidikan tidak diterbitkan, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur.Al-Junaidi Mohammad (2012). Content and Language Integrated Learning: TeachingScience for Understanding to Limited English Proficient Students. UniversitiPendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjung Malim.Al-Rabaani, A. (2014). The Acquisition of Science Process Skills by Omanis PreService Social Studies Teachers. European Journal Of EducationalStudies, 6(1), 13-19.Ango, M. (2002). Mastery of science process skills and their effective use in theteaching of science: An educology of science education in the NigerianContext. International Journey of Educology , 16(1), 11-30.Arends, R.B. (1998). Teaching Modern Science. Columbus: NY: Charles MerrillPublishing Company.Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum (2012). Dokumen Standard KSSR Modul TerasTema Dunia Sains dan Teknologi Tahun 3. Putrajaya: Kementerian PelajaranMalaysia.Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum (2013). Modul Pengajaran danPembelajaran:Pendekatan Inkuri Melalui Kemahiran Proses Sains Tahun 4.Putrajaya: Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.Bhasah Abu Bakar (2009). Asas Pengukuran Bilik Darjah. Tanjung Malim: QuantumBooksBorich, G.D & Tambori, M.L. (2007). Educational Psycology: A ComtemporaryApproach. NY: LongmanBransford, B. (2009). Social Constructivism. Diakses darihttp//www.coe.uga.edu/epltt/Social Constructivism.htm pada 16 November2016Brotherton, P.N. (2005). Science process skills: Their nature and interrelationships.Research in Science and Technological Education, 13(1), 5 11.Brotherton, P.N. (2010). An examination of the ability of third grade children from theScience Curriculum Improvement Study to identify experimental variables andto recognize change. Science Education, 57, 123-151.Brotherton P. N. & Preece P.F., (2005). Science process skills: Their nature andinterrelationships. Research in Science and Technological Education, 13 (1),511Burak, K.T., Mehmet, F.T. & Mustafa, T. (2006). Development and validation of amultiple formet test of science process skills. International Education Journal,7 (7), 1007 - 1027Burns, J. C., Okey, J. R., & Wise, K. C. (1985). Development of an integrated processskill test: TIPS II. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22, 169-177.Cain, S.G. (2012). Penguasaan kemahiran proses sains di kalangan pelajarTingkatan Empat di Kota Bharu. (Tesis Sarjana yang tidak diterbitkan).Universiti Malaysia: Kuala Lumpur.Carey, P. (1994). Measurement and Assessment In Teaching. 7th ed. EnglewoodCliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Chabalengula, V. (2012). How Pre-Service Teachers, Understand and PerformScience Process Skills. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science andTechnology Education, 8(3), 167-176.Chan MT (1984). The teaching of science process skills: primary teachers' selfperception. Asia-Pacific Teacher Education Development. 5(1), 91-111.Chang, K.P. (2008). Bullying in middle schools: An Asian-pacific regionalstudy. Asia-Pacific Education Review, 9(4), 393-405.Chua, Y.P. (2016). Asas Statistik Penyelidikan. Selangor : McGraw-Hill (M) Sdn.Bhd.Cohen, J. (1960). A Coefficient of Agreement for Normal Scale. Educational andPsychological Measurement, 20, 37-46Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education.London: Routledge Falmer.Curriculum Development Centre (2006). Integrated Curriculum for PrimarySchool: Curriculum Specification Science Year 4. Kuala Lumpur: Ministry ofEducation.Danial Rahim, (2010). Tahap Penguasaan Guru dalam Melaksanakan PentaksiranKerja Amali (PEKA) Sains Menengah Rendah. Dibentangkan dalam SeminarNational Science and Mathematics Education di UPSI.David, R.K. (1994). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification ofEducation Goals. New York : Longmans Green.Dewey, J. (1996). Science process skills and attitudes of pre-service elementaryteachers. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 11(2), 57-64. Diaksesdari http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03173838 pada 02 April 2017.Dietz, M.A. & George, K.D. (1970). A Test to Measure Problem Solving Skills inScience Education in Grade One, Two and Three. Journal of Research inScience Education, 7(4), 341-351Dillashaw, F. & Okey. J. (1980). Test of integrated process skills for secondaryscience students. Science Education, 64, 601-608.Doher, J. (1991). Science process skills and attitudes of pre-service elementaryteachers. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 11(2), 57-64. Diaksesdari http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03173838 pada 23 Mei 2016.Ebel, R. L., & Frisbie, D. A. (1991). Essentials of Educational Management. 5th ed.Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Ebel, R.L. (2009). Essentials of educational measurement. NJ: Prentice-Hall.Ercan, S. (2007). Comparing elementary teachers scientific process skills andscientific self-efficacy levels. (Tesis yang tidak diterbitkan). AfyonKocatepe University, Afyonkarahisar.Edy Hafizan Mohd Shahali, Lilia Halim & T.Subahan Meerah, (2012). PerceptionConceptual Knowledge And Compentency Level Of Integrated ScienceProcess Skills Towards Planning A Professional Enchanment Programme.Sains Malaysiana 41(7), 921 - 930Erdogan, F.J. (2005). Survey Research Method. Beverly Hill. C.A: Sage PublicationFaiza, K. (2012). Masalah guru dalam pengendalian Penilaian Kerja Amali (PEKA)Biologi di daerah Muar. (Tesis yang tidak diterbitkan). Universiti TeknologiMalaysia (UTM), Skudai.Fatin Aliah Phang & Nor Athirah Tahir. (2011). Kemahiran Proses Sains dalamKalangan Mahasiswa Pendidikan Sains UTM. Journal of Science andMathematical Educational.(3), 123-133.Fleiss, J. L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and propositions (2nd edition). NY:John Wiley & Sons.Fraenkel, J.R. & Wallen, N.E. (2006). How to Design and Evaluvate Research onEducation. San Fransico: McGraw-HillGagne, R.M. (1965). The conditions of learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart andWinston, Inc.Gay, L. R., & Airasian, P. (2006). Educational research: Competencies for analysisand application (7th ed.). NJ: Pearson Education.Gay, L., Mills, G., & Airasian, P. (2009). Educational research: Competencies foranalysis and application. NewJersey: Lawrance Erlbaum Associates,Publishers.Gernett, P.J. (1981). Reasoning Patterns of Preservice Elementary and Middle SchoolScience Teachers. Science Education : 68 (5), 621-631Hammann, E.L. (2008). Intergrating Science with Mathematics & Literacy.California: Corwin Press.Hassard, J. (2010). The Art of Teaching Science: Inquiry and Innovation in MiddleSchool and High School. New York : Oxford Universty Press.Haladyna, S. A. (2014). Teacher Preferences For Teaching Problem Solving AndScience Process Skills. United States: Texas Woman's UniversityIbrahim Bilgin, (2006). Fokus beberapa pendekatan Penilaian DalamMata pelajaranPendidikan Sains Kurikulum Bersepadu Sekolah Menengah. JurnalKurikulum, ( 18): 91-97Ismail, Z. (2008). Penguasaan Kemahiran Proses Sains Murid Sekolah Rendah danMenengah. Jurnal Kurikulum, 1, 109-120Jabatan Pelajaran Perak (2013). Buku Panduan Pembinaan Item. Kuala Lumpur:Kementerian Pelajaran MalaysiaJohairi, Z., (2007). Sikap Guru D=dan Pelajar Terhadap Perlaksanaan PEKA Biologi :Satu Tinjauan Awal Ilmiah. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi.Jumanne, C. (2012). A study of grade 7 students understanding of theconstruction of scientific knowledge. International Journal of ScienceEducation, 11( ), 514 - 529.Kathleen, A.S. & Paul, W.W., (1990). The development of a science processassessment for fourth?grade students. Journal of Research in ScienceTeaching, 27 (8), 717-818Kazeni, M.M. (2015). Development and Validation of A Test of Integrated ScienceProcess Skills for Further Education and Training Learners. (Tesis yang tidakditerbitkan). University of Pretoria, South AfricaKementerian Pelajaran Malaysia (2008). Science Practical Work Assessment (PEKA).Kuala Lumpur: Lembaga Peperiksaan MalaysiaKementerian Pelajaran Malaysia (2011). Komponen Soalan Struktur. Kuala Lumpur:Bahagian Pengurusan LatihanKoegh, M. & Naylor, J. (2006). The courage to be a constructivist. EducationalLeadership, 57(3), 18-24.Lawson, A. E. (1995). The Development and Validation of A Classroom Test ofFormal Reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 15, 11-24.Lay, Y. F. (2010), Pencapaian Kemahiran Proses Sains Asas dan Bersepadu diKalangan Guru Sains Sekolah Rendah. (Tesis yang tidak diterbitkan).Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Sintok.Lee, O. (2004). Improving Science Inquiry with Elementary Students Of DiverseBackgrounds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(3), 337-357.Majid, A.K. (2010). Pengenalan Rangkakerja Metodologi dalam Kajian Penyelidikan:Satu Kajian Kes. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities. 1(1),17-23Macintosh, H.G. & Morrison, R.B., (1969). Objective Testing. London : University ofLondon Press Ltd.McBeath, C.S. (1992). Learning Science Process Skills. Iowa: KendallMehrens, S.P. & Lehmann, L.M., (2011). Interpreting Pragmatic Meaning WhenReading Popular Reports Of Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching31 (9), 94767Miles, E. (2010). In-Service Elementary Teachers Familiarity, Interest, ConceptualKnowledge, and Performance on Science Process Skills. USA: SouthernIllinois University Carbondale.Molitor, L. L., & George, K. D. (1976). Development Of A Test Of Science ProcessSkills. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 13, 405-412.Mumba, K. (2010). Development and validation of a test of integrated science processskills for the further education and training learners. (Tesis yang tidakditerbitkan) University of Pretoria, South Africa.Mutlu, T. & Temiz, B. K. (2013). The Importance and Role of The Science ProcessSkills in Science Teaching. Universiti Egitim, Fakulti Dergisi, 1(13), 89101.Nordin Tahir, (2006). Asas Penilaian Pendidikan. Petaling Jaya: Longman MalaysiaSdn.Bhd.Ong Eng Tek & Johairi Abdul Rahim. (2011). Tahap Penguasaan Kemahiran ProsesSains Bersepadu dalam Kalangan Pelajar Tingkatan 2 di daerah Temerloh.Jurnal Pendidikan,(1),7-20Ong Eng Tek, Wong Yew Tuang, Sopia Md Yassin, Salidah Baharom, AsmayatiYahaya & Zahid Mat Said. (2011). The Development and Validation ofMalaysian-Based Basic and Intergrated Science Process Skills Inventory.Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjung Malim.Oppenheim, J. (2012). Learning From Physics Text: A synthesis of recent Research.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 895911.Padilla, M. (1990). The Science Process Skills: Science Matters to the ScienceTeacher. No. 9004. March 1, 1990. Diakses darihttp://www.narst.org/publications/research/skill.cfm. pada 24 Mei 2016.Padilla, M., Okey, J., & Dillashaw, J. (1983). The relationship between scienceprocess skills and formal thinking abilities. Journal of Research in ScienceTeaching, 20, 239-246.Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum (2001). Sukatan Pelajaran Sains Tahun 5. Putrajaya:Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum (2003). Sukatan Pelajaran Sains Tahun 6. Putrajaya:Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.Pusat Pembangunan Kurikulum (2013), Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Rendah SainsTahun 4. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan MalaysiaRichardson, V. (2007). Building A World of New Understandings :ConstructivistTeacher Education. Washington: Falmer Press.Rohana, S. & Shaharom, J. (2008). Kesan Penggunaan Kaedah PembelajaranBerasaskan Masalah Terhadap Kemahiran Berfikir Kritis, Kreatif, ProsesSains dan Pencapaian Biologi. Universiti Sains Malaysia. Tesis DoktorFalsafah.Saat, K. (2004). Science Process Assessments for Elementary and Middle SchoolStudents. Diakses dari http://www.scienceprocesstests.com/ pada 26 April2017.Salasiah, Z. (2015). Pembinaan dan Penentusahan Instrumen Ujian KemahiranProses Sains Bersepadu Sekolah Rendah. Tesis Sarjana UniversitiPendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjung Malim.Salbiah Mohd. Som. (2010). Kajian Kes tentang Pelaksanaan Kemahiran ProsesSains Dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Biologi Tingkatan 4. TesisSarjana Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi.Salkind, J.W. (2016). Principles of educational measurement and psychologicalmeasurement and evaluation. California: Wadsworth Publishing Company.Screen, P. (1986). The Warwick Process Science project. School Science Review,67(242), 12-16. Diakses darihttp://www.researchgate.net/publication/304077227_Process_Science pada 20Jun 2017.Settlage J. & Southerland S. A., (2007). Teaching Science to Every Child: UsingCulture as a Starting Point. New York: Routledge. Google ScholarSharma, (2014). Profil Kemahiran Pemikiran Kritikal Antara Pelajar Aliran Sains danBukan Sains. Jurnal Malaysian Education Deans Council, (3), 20?27.Shaw, T. J. (1983). The effect of a process-oriented science curriculum upon problemsolving ability. Science Education, 67(5), 615-623.Shuhairi Abdul Razak (2008). Kesan Penggunaan Kaedah Pembelajaran BerasaskanMasalah Terhadap Kemahiran Berfikir Kritis, Kreatif, Proses Sains danPencapaian Biologi. Universiti Sains Malaysia. Tesis Doktor Falsafah.Simon, M.S. (2006). Science and writing. Science and Children. DevelopmentalReview, 18 (3): 7-9.Siti Aloyah, A. (2012). Penilaian Pelaksanaan Program PEKA Biologi. (Tesis yangtidak diterbitkan). Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi.Stankey, C.A. & Hopkins C.M., (2012). Introduction to Educational Research.Boston: Pearson Education.Stemler, S.E. (1998). Using the theory of successful intelligence as a framework fordeveloping assessments in AP physics. Contemporary EducationalPsychology, 34, 195209Steven L.M. (2008), Interpreting Pragmatic Meaning When Reading Popular ReportsOf Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31 (9), 94767Sulaiman Ngah Razali. (2002) Teachers in Rural Primary Schools: A Study on TheirPerceptions on Teacher Preparation, School Environment and ParentalInvolvement. Jounal of Social Science 1 (1), 2740Tan, Y.K. (1993). Acquisition of integrated science process skills and its relationshipwith cognitive styles of Form Four science students. (Tesis belum diterbitkan).University Malaya, Kuala Lumpur.Tan, B.K. (1997). The Importance and Role of The Science Process Skills in ScienceTeaching. (Tesis yang tidak diterbitkan). Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia,Bangi.Tannenbaum, R. S. (1971). Development of the Test Of Science Processes. Journal ofResearch in Science Teaching, 8(2), 123-136.Tavakol, M. & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbachs alpha. InternationalJournal of Medical Education, (2), 53-55Tobin, K. G. & Capie, W. (1982). The development and validation of a Group Testof integrated science processess. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,19(2), 113-141.Trowbridge, L.W. (1981). Teaching Science by Inquiry in the Secondary School.Columbus: Charles E Merrill Publishing CompanyWan Noraine, W. N. (2010). Kesediaan Guru dalam Melaksanakan PEKA PMR diSekolah Menengah Kuala Trengganu. (Tesis yang tidak diterbitkan).Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Johor.Walbesser, M.S. (1965). The effects of testing on science process skill achievement,.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26(8), 659-664Wellington, J. (1994). Secondary Science: Contemporary Issues and PracticalApproaches. London: Routledge.Wood, K.E. (2001). Tips for Improving Testing and Grading. London: SagePublication.Zeitler, T. (1981). Science Instruction in the Middle and Secondary Schools. NJ:Merrill Prentice Hall.Zurida Ismail, Sharifah Norhaidah Shed Idros & Maznah Ali. (2013). PendidikanSains Prasekolah. Pahang: PTS Publication.

Pembinaan dan penentusahan instrumen ujian subjektif kemahiran proses sains asas dan bersepadu sekolah rendah

Similar Items