Pembangunan dan validasi rubrik sebagai alat pengukuran penulisan ilmiah pelajar ijazah sarjana muda

Pembangunan dan validasi rubrik sebagai alat pengukuran penulisan ilmiah pelajar ijazah sarjana muda

Kajian ini bertujuan untuk membangun dan memvalidasikan rubrik sebagai alat pengukuranpenulisan ilmiah pelajar Ijazah Sarjana Muda. Model Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, Evaluation (ADDIE) telah digunakan untuk menginstruksikan rubrikdalam proses pengajaran dan pembelajaran (PdP)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Norzalina Noor
Format: thesis
Language:zsm
Published: 2018
Subjects:
H Social Sciences
Online Access:https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5220
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:5220
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
collection UPSI Digital Repository
language zsm
topic H Social Sciences
spellingShingle H Social Sciences
Norzalina Noor
Pembangunan dan validasi rubrik sebagai alat pengukuran penulisan ilmiah pelajar ijazah sarjana muda
description Kajian ini bertujuan untuk membangun dan memvalidasikan rubrik sebagai alat pengukuranpenulisan ilmiah pelajar Ijazah Sarjana Muda. Model Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, Evaluation (ADDIE) telah digunakan untuk menginstruksikan rubrikdalam proses pengajaran dan pembelajaran (PdP). Reka bentuk kajian ini menggunakan kaedahkombinasi penerokaan secara berperingkat dengan fasa pertama, iaitu fasa analisis,kemudian diikuti oleh fasa reka bentuk dengan membangunkan model penilaian rubrik. Seterusnyafasa implementasi yang dilaksanakan dalam proses PdP untuk menganalisis penilaian proses danmembaiki rubrik yang sudah disediakan. Pendekatan kualitatif digunakan bagi menganalisismaklum balas pelajar (58 responden) dan pensyarah (4 informan), manakala pendekatankuantitatif telah digunakan bagi menganalisis soal selidik pelajar (234 responden) danskor markah penulisan ilmiah pelajar (122 responden). Dapatan kajian maklum balas pelajar telah membangunkan satu rubrik melalui proses penambahbaikan secaraberperingkat. Kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan yang tinggi terhadap rubrik dapat dilihatmelalui analisis Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) dengan nilai r=0.929, Limit of Aggrement (LOA) yang menunjukkan kedekatan varians kepada beza min yang agakdekat (Min 0.429 daripada nilai ? 0.462) dan Standard Error of Measurements (SEM) yangdidapati rendah daripada1.00 dengan nilai 0.32. Analisis ujian-t terhadap skor markah draf awal dan draf akhirmelalui penilaian kendiri pelajar juga menunjukkan perbezaan yang signifikan dengan peningkatankualiti penulisan yang ketara (Min 12.17 kepada 17.13). Implikasinya, penggunaan rubrik berkesan dalam penilaian kendiri dan alat pengukuran penskoran pensyarah yang telus dan adil. Kajian ini telah membangunkan rubrik dan satu modelpenilaian yang memberi sumbangan baharu terhadap model penilaian sedia ada bagi kegunaankementerian, pendidik dan pelajar.
format thesis
qualification_name
qualification_level Doctorate
author Norzalina Noor
author_facet Norzalina Noor
author_sort Norzalina Noor
title Pembangunan dan validasi rubrik sebagai alat pengukuran penulisan ilmiah pelajar ijazah sarjana muda
title_short Pembangunan dan validasi rubrik sebagai alat pengukuran penulisan ilmiah pelajar ijazah sarjana muda
title_full Pembangunan dan validasi rubrik sebagai alat pengukuran penulisan ilmiah pelajar ijazah sarjana muda
title_fullStr Pembangunan dan validasi rubrik sebagai alat pengukuran penulisan ilmiah pelajar ijazah sarjana muda
title_full_unstemmed Pembangunan dan validasi rubrik sebagai alat pengukuran penulisan ilmiah pelajar ijazah sarjana muda
title_sort pembangunan dan validasi rubrik sebagai alat pengukuran penulisan ilmiah pelajar ijazah sarjana muda
granting_institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
granting_department Fakulti Bahasa dan Komunikasi
publishDate 2018
url https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5220
_version_ 1747833172131840000
spelling oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:52202020-09-09 Pembangunan dan validasi rubrik sebagai alat pengukuran penulisan ilmiah pelajar ijazah sarjana muda 2018 Norzalina Noor H Social Sciences Kajian ini bertujuan untuk membangun dan memvalidasikan rubrik sebagai alat pengukuranpenulisan ilmiah pelajar Ijazah Sarjana Muda. Model Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, Evaluation (ADDIE) telah digunakan untuk menginstruksikan rubrikdalam proses pengajaran dan pembelajaran (PdP). Reka bentuk kajian ini menggunakan kaedahkombinasi penerokaan secara berperingkat dengan fasa pertama, iaitu fasa analisis,kemudian diikuti oleh fasa reka bentuk dengan membangunkan model penilaian rubrik. Seterusnyafasa implementasi yang dilaksanakan dalam proses PdP untuk menganalisis penilaian proses danmembaiki rubrik yang sudah disediakan. Pendekatan kualitatif digunakan bagi menganalisismaklum balas pelajar (58 responden) dan pensyarah (4 informan), manakala pendekatankuantitatif telah digunakan bagi menganalisis soal selidik pelajar (234 responden) danskor markah penulisan ilmiah pelajar (122 responden). Dapatan kajian maklum balas pelajar telah membangunkan satu rubrik melalui proses penambahbaikan secaraberperingkat. Kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan yang tinggi terhadap rubrik dapat dilihatmelalui analisis Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) dengan nilai r=0.929, Limit of Aggrement (LOA) yang menunjukkan kedekatan varians kepada beza min yang agakdekat (Min 0.429 daripada nilai ? 0.462) dan Standard Error of Measurements (SEM) yangdidapati rendah daripada1.00 dengan nilai 0.32. Analisis ujian-t terhadap skor markah draf awal dan draf akhirmelalui penilaian kendiri pelajar juga menunjukkan perbezaan yang signifikan dengan peningkatankualiti penulisan yang ketara (Min 12.17 kepada 17.13). Implikasinya, penggunaan rubrik berkesan dalam penilaian kendiri dan alat pengukuran penskoran pensyarah yang telus dan adil. Kajian ini telah membangunkan rubrik dan satu modelpenilaian yang memberi sumbangan baharu terhadap model penilaian sedia ada bagi kegunaankementerian, pendidik dan pelajar. 2018 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5220 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5220 text zsm closedAccess Doctoral Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Bahasa dan Komunikasi Abdul Halim, Lilia Halim, T. Subahan Mohd Meerah, & Kamisah Osman. (2010). Pembangunaninstrumen penyelesaian masalah Sains. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 35(1), 3539.Allen, D., & Tanner, K. (2006). Rubrics: Tools for making learning goals and evaluation criteriaexplicit for both teachers and learners. CBELife Sciences Education, 5(3), 197203. Diperolehdaripada http://ww.lifescied.org/content/5/3/197.full.pdf+htmlAllen, M. J. (2004). Assessing academic programs in higher education. Bolton, MA: Anker.Andrade, H. L., & Du, Y. (2007). Student responses to criteria-referenced self- assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(2), 159181.Diperoleh daripada https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930600801928Andrade, H. L., Du, Y., & Mycek, K. (2010). Rubric-referenced self-assessment and middleschool students writing. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17(2),199214.Archer, J. C. (2010). State of the science in health professional education: Effectivefeedback. Medical Education. Diperoleh daripada https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03546.x.Arieff Salleh Rosman, Ahmad Mahyuddin Hassan, Azmi Shah, Mohd Nasir Ripin, &Nurazmallail Marni. (2008). Persepsi pelajar Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM) terhadapplagiarisme. Jurnal Teknologi, 48(E), 114.Armenakis, A., Harris, S., & Feild, H. (1999). Making change permanent: A model forinstitutionalizing change interventions. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 12, 97128. Diperoleh daripadahttp://www.emeraldinsight.com.ezpustaka.upsi.edu.my/doi/pdfplus/10.1016/S0897- 3016%2899%2912005-6Ary, D., Jacob, L.C. & Razavieh, A. (2002). Introduction to research in education (6th ed). NewYork: Harcourt Brace Collage Pub.Ary, D., Jacob, L. C., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to research in education (8th ed.). USA:Wadsworth.Asmah Omar. (2009). Panduan wacana akademik: Model dan penerapan.(Edisi kedua).Selangor: Dawama Sdn. Bhd.Azizi Ahmad. (2010). Pentaksiran pembelajaran. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa danPustaka.Azizi Yahaya, Shahrin Hashim, Jamaluddin Ramli, Boon, Y., & Abd. Rahim Hamdan. (2007).Menguasai penyelidikan dalam pendidikan (Edisi kedua). Kuala Lumpur: PTS ProfesionalPublishing.Bahagian Pendidikan Guru, Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia (KPM). (1994). Laporan kajiankeberkesanan pelaksanaan kurikulum KPLI (Kursus Perguruan Lepasan Ijazah). Kuala Lumpur.Baharuddin Aris, Maizah Hura Ahmad, Shiong, K. B., Mohamad Bilal Ali, Jamaliuddin Harun, &Zaidatun Tasir. (2008). Learning Goal Programming using an interactive multimediacourseware: Design factors and students preferences. Journal of Educational Multimedia andHypermedia, 17(1), 5979.Bahdin Nur Tanjung, & Ardial. (2013). Pedoman penulisan karya ilmiah (Proposal, skripsi, dantesis). Indonesia: KENCANA Prenada Media Group.Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.Psychological Review, 84(2), 191215. Diperoleh daripadahttps://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Eaglewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.Bandurek, G. R. (2005). Using design of experiments in validation. BioPharmInternational, 18(5), 4052. Diperoleh daripada https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-20644432221&partnerID=40&md5=37426177e6254b19be5510b2f3c2ba23Bartlett, J. E., Kotrlik, J. W., & Higgins, C. C. (2001). Organizational research:Determining appropriate sample size in survey research. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 19(1), 4350. Diperoleh daripadahttps://doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2009.2020494Bates, R. (2004). A critical analysis of evaluation practice: the kirkpatrick model and theprinciple of beneficence. Evaluation and Program Planning, 27, 341347.Bazeley, P., & Jackson, K. (2013). Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo. Sage Publications (Vol.2nd). Diperoleh daripada https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2014.992750.Bharuthram, S. (2015). The value of assessment rubrics for informing teaching practice andcurriculum review and development. Africa Education Review, 12(3), 415428.Diperoleh daripada https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2015.1110907Black, P., & William, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standard throughclassroom assessment. London: School of Education, King College.Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (2010). Statistical methods for assessing agreementbetween two methods of clinical measurement. International Journal Nursing Study, 47(8), 931936.Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Educational research: An introduction. New York: Longmans Inc.Bollen. (2011). Evaluating Effect, Composite, and Causal Indicators in Structural Equation Models.MIS Quarterly, 35(2), 359.Diperoleh daripada https://doi.org/10.2307/23044047.Boohene, R., & Williams, A. A. (2012). Resistance to organisational change: A casestudy of Oti Yeboah Complex Limited. International Business and Management, 4(1), 135145. Diperoleh daripadahttps://doi.org/10.3968/j.ibm.1923842820120401.1040Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (1989). Educational research: An introduction (5th ed.). New York:Longmans.Box, C., Skoog, G., & Dabbs, J. M. (2015). A case study of teacher personal practiceassessment theories and complexities of implementing formative assessment. American Educational Research Journal, 52(5), 956983. Diperoleh daripadahttps://doi.org/10.3102/0002831215587754Brookhart, S. M. (2007). Expending views about formative classroom assessment: A reviewof literature. In McMillan J.H. (Ed.), Formative classroom assessment: Theory intopractice. (pp. 4362). New York: Teachers College Press.Brown, G. T. L., Andrade, H. L., & Chen, F. (2015). Accuracy in student self-assessment: directions and cautions for research. Assessment in Education:Principles, Policy and Practice, 22(4), 444457. Diperoleh daripadahttps://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2014.996523Brown, G. T. L., Kennedy, K. J., Fok, P. K., Chan, J. K. S., & Yu, W. M. (2009).Assessment in education: Principles, policy, and practice. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 16(3), 129. Diperoleh daripadahttps://doi.org/10.1080/0969594032000085730Brown, H. D. (2000). Principle of language learning and teaching (4th ed.). New York:Pearson Education Inc.Bryington, A. A., Palmer, D. J., & Watkins, M. W. (2002). The estimation of interobserver agreementin behavioral assessment. The Behavior Analyst Today, 3(3), 323328. Diperoleh daripadahttps://doi.org/10.1037/h0099978.Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods Bryman. OXFORD University Press.Diperoleh daripada https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004Burch, C. (1997). Creating a two-tiered portfolio rubric. English Journal, 86(1), 5558. Burke, W.M. (2008). Organization change: Theory and practice (2nd ed.). California:SAGE Publication Ltd.Chan, Y. F. (2003). Pendekatan penilaian: Satu tinjauan dari aspek kesesuaiannya dalam penilaianprogram latihan. Jurnal Pengurusan Dan Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 13(1), 6581.Chang, M., & S. Goswami, J. (2011). Factors affecting the implementation ofcommunicative language teaching in Taiwanese College English classes. English Language Teaching, 4(2), 312. Diperoleh daripadahttps://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v4n2p3Chappuis, S., & Chappuis, J. (2008). The best value in formative assessment.Educational Leadership, 65(4), 1419.Chevalier, R. (2010). Gap analysis revisited. Performance Improvement, 49(7), 57.Diperoleh daripada https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.20160.Chevalier, R. (2011). When did ADDIE become addie? Performance Improvement, 50(6), 1014.Diperoleh daripada https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.20221.Chin, R., & Benne, K. D. (1985). General strategies for effecting changes in humansystems. In W. G. Bennis, K. D. Benne, & R. Chin (Eds.), The planning of change (4th ed., pp.2243). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Cho, J., & Trent, A. (2006). Validity in qualitative research revisited. Qualitative Research,6(3), 319340. Diperoleh daripada https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106065006.Cho, S., & Park, C. (2014). The role of scoring in formative assessment of secondlanguage writing. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 14(3), 105121.Chua, Y. P. (2006). Kaedah Penyelidikan. Malaysia: McGraw-Hill Inc.Chua, Y. P. (2009). Statistik penyelidikan lanjutan: Ujian regresi, analisis faktor dananalisis SEM buku 5. Malaysia: McGraw-Hill Inc.Cizek, G. J. (2007). Formative classroom and large-scale assessment: Implications forfuture rand development. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), Formative classroom assessment: Theory intopractice. New York: Teachers College Press.Clayton, S. (2003). Environmental identity: A conceptual and an operational definition.Identity and the Natural Environment The Psychological Significance of Nature, 45 65.Coady, D. A., Walker, D. J., & Kay, L. J. (2004). Teaching medicalstudents musculoskeletal examination skills: Identifying barriers to learning and ways ofovercoming them. Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology, 33(1), 4751. Diperoleh daripadahttps://doi.org/10.1080/03009740310004108Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. (6 Ed.).London: Routledge.Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education. London: Routledge.Cothran, D. J., Hodges Kulinna, P., & Garrahy, D. A. (2003). This is kind of giving a secretaway...: Students perspectives on effective class management. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(4), 435444. Diperoleh daripadahttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(03)00027-1Creemers, B. P. M., & Scheerens, J. (1994). Developments in the educationaleffectiveness research programme. International Journal of Educational Research, 21(2), 125140.Diperoleh daripada https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-0355(94)90028-0Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methodapproaches (4th ed.). USA: SAGE Publication Ltd.Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry.College of Education, 39(3), 124130.Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M., & Hanson, W. (2003). Advanced mixedmethods research designs. Dalam A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixedmethods in sosial & behavioral research (ms. 209240). Thousands Oaks, CA: SAGE PublicationLtd.DaRosa, D., Skeff, K., Friedland, J., Coburn, M., Cox, S., Pollart, S., Smith, S. (2011).Barriers to effective teaching. Academic Medicine?: Journal of the Association ofAmerican Medical Colleges, 86(4), 453459. Diperoleh daripadahttps://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31820defbeDawson, P. (2017). Assessment rubrics: Towards clearer and more replicable design,research and practice. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(3), 347 360. Diperolehdaripada https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1111294Deci, E., Vallerand, R., Pelletier, L., & Ryan, R. (1991). Motivation and education: Theself-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26(3), 325346. Diperolehdaripada https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2603&4_6Djemari Mardapi. (2012). Pengukuran penilaian dan evaluasi pendidikan. Yogyakarta: NuhaLitera.Doll, R. C. (1996). Curriculum improvement: Desicion making and process. (9 Ed.).Bosto: Allyn and Bacon Inc.Dolma, S. (2010). The central role of the unit of analysis concept in research design.Istanbul University Journal of the School of Business Administration, 39(1), 169174. Diperoleh daripadahttp://eds.b.ebscohost.com.uplib.idm.oclc.org/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=33&sid=557e1ca9-810b-4e4f-ae0a-c29c73493ce2@sessionmgr103&hid=117.Eko Putro Widoyoko. (2009). Evaluasi program pembelajaran panduan praktis bagi pendidik dan calonpendidik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.Esah Sulaiman. (2012). Asas pedagogi (Edisi ketiga). Johor bahru: Universiti Teknologi MalaysiaEseryel, D. (2002). Approaches to evaluation of training: Theory and practice.Educational Technology and Society, 5(2), 9398.Eshun, E., & Oseipoku, P. (2013). Design students perspectives on assessment rubric in studio-basedlearning. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 10(1), 113. Diperoleh daripadahttp://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eue&AN=89049796&site= ehost-live.Fitzpatrick, J. L., Sanders, J. R., & Worthen, B. R. (2004). Program evaluation-alternative approaches and practical guidelines. (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon Inc.Flower, L. S., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. CollegeComposition and Communication, 32(4), 365. Diperoleh daripadahttps://doi.org/10.2307/356600.Frae kel, J. R., & Wallen, E. N. (1996). How to design and evaluate research. USA:McGraw-Hill Inc.Gable, R. K., & Wolf, M. B. (1993). Instrument development in the effective domain (2nded.). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publisher.Gall, M., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2010). Applying educational research. USA:Pearson Education Inc.Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2009). Educational research competencies for analysis andapplications. (6th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc.Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. New York: BasicBooks.Ghasemi, A., & Zahediasl, S. (2012). Normality tests for statistical analysis: A guide fornon-statisticians. International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 10(2), 486489.Diperoleh daripada https://doi.org/10.5812/ijem.3505Glass, K. T. (2005). Curriculum design for writing instruction: Creating standards-based lessonplans and rubrics. Thousands Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Glenn, C., & Goldthwaite, M. A. (2013). The St. Martins guide to teaching writing. (7th ed.). NewJersey: Bedford/St.Martins.Goetz, J. P., & LeCompte, M. D. (2009). Ethnographic Research and the Problem of Data Reduction.Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 12(1), 5170. Diperoleh daripadahttps://doi.org/10.1525/aeq.1981.12.1.05x1283iGoode, W. J., & Hatt, P. K. (1952). Methods in social research. New York: McGraw- Hill Inc.Goodland, J. ., & Associates. (1979). Curriculum inquiry: The study of curriculumpractice. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.Gorard, S. (2003). Quantitative methods in social science. London: Continuum.Graff, C. J. (2014). Mixed methods research. In H.R. Hall & L.A. Rousell (Eds.),Evidence-Based Practice: An Integrative Approach to Research, Administration, and Practice,4564.Groeber, J. (2003). Designing rubrics for reading and language arts. Arlington Heights: PearsonEducation,Inc.Groenewald, T. (2004). A Phenomenological Research Design Illustrated. International Journal ofQualitative Methods, 3(1), 4255. Diperoleh daripada https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690400300104Guest, G., Namey, E. ., & Mitchell, M. (2013). Collecting qualitative data: A fieldmanual for applied research. Thousands Oaks, CA: SAGE Publication Ltd.Diperoleh daripada https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112455042.Guion, L. A., Diehl, D. C., & Mcdonald, D. (2002). Triangulation: Establishing thevalidity of qualitative. University of Florida/IFAS, 13. Diperoleh daripadahttps://doi.org/#FCS6014.Guskey, T. R. (2002). Evaluating profesional development. California: Corwin Press Inc.Hack, C. (2015). Analytical rubrics in higher education: A repository of empirical data.British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(5), 924927. Diperoleh daripadahttps://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12304Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate dataanalysis. Vectors (7th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc. Diperoleh daripadahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.02.019.Hall, K., & Burke, W. M. (2003). Making formative assessment work: Effective practice in theprimary classroom. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Hammond, R. L. (1973). Evaluation at the local level. In B. R. Worthen & J. R. Sanders (Eds.),Educational Evaluation: theory and practice. (ms. 157167). Belmont, California: Wadsworth.Hanson, R. (2000). Writing successfully. Boston: Allyn and Bacon Inc.Harden, A. (2010). Mixed-Methods Systematic Reviews: Integrating Quantitative and QualitativeFindings. Focus, (25), 18.Harjuli Surya Putra. (2012). Pengembangan rubrik penilaian untuk digunakan guru dalammenilai hasil tulisan siswa SMA. (Tesis sarjana tidak diterbitkan). Fakultas IlmuPengetahuan Budaya: Universitas Indonesia.Harlen, W. (2005). Trusting teachers judgement: Research evidence of the reliability and validityof teachers assessment used for summative purposes. Research Papers in Education, 20(3), 245270. Diperoleh daripadahttps://doi.org/10.1080/02671520500193744.Harlen, W. (2007). Formative classroom assessment in science and mathematics. InFormative classroom assessment: Theory into practice. (ms. 116135). New York: Teachers CollegePress.Harks, B., Rakoczy, K., Hattie, J., Besser, M., & Klieme, E. (2014). The effects of feedback onachievement, interest and self-evaluation: The role of feedbacks perceived usefulness. EducationalPsychology, 34(3), 269290. Diperoleh daripadahttps://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.785384Hays, B., & Lantz, J. (2004). Rubrics for assessing student achievement in Sciencegrades K12. Thousands Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Heldsinger, S. A., & Humphry, S. M. (2013). Using calibrated exemplars in the teacher- assessmentof writing: An empirical study. Educational Research, 55(3), 219235. Diperoleh daripadahttps://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2013.825159.Hendry, G. D., White, P., & Herbert, C. (2016). Providing exemplar-based feedforward before anassessment: The role of teacher explanation. Active Learning in Higher Education, 17(2), 99109.Diperoleh daripada https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787416637479Hermansen, H., & Nerland, M. (2014). Reworking practice through an AfL project: An analysis ofteachers collaborative engagement with new assessment guidelines.British Educational Research Journal, 40(1). Diperoleh daripada https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3037Herscovitch, L., & Meyer, J. P. (2002). Commitment to organizational change:Extension of a three-component model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 474 487.Hilezan Zainal, Parimalarani, Sivasubramaniam, & Tan, K. L. (2014). Amalanpentaksiran dalam Matematik. Kuala Lumpur: Freemind Horizons Sd. Bhd.Holmes, L. E., & Smith, L. J. (2003). Student evaluations of faculty grading methods.Journal of Education for Business, 78(6), 318323. Diperoleh daripadahttps://doi.org/10.1080/08832320309598620.Holt, D. T., Armenakis, A. A., Feild, H. S., & Harris, S. G. (2007). Readiness fororganizational change the systematic development of a scale. Journal of AppliedBehavioral Science, 43(2), 232255. Diperoleh daripadahttps://doi.org/10.1177/0021886306295295.Holt, D. T., Armenakis, A. A., Harris, S. G., & Feild, H. S. (2007). Richard Woodman, ProfessorWilliam Pasmore, Abraham B. (Rami) Shani. In R. Woodman, W. Pasmore, & A. B. (Rami)Shani (Eds.), Research in Organizational Change and Development (ms. 289336). Emerald GroupPublishing Limited.Humphry, S. M., & Heldsinger, S. A. (2014). Common structural design features ofrubrics may represent a threat to validity. Educational Researcher, 43(5). Diperoleh daripadahttps://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14542154.Hunt, P., Goetz, L., & Anderson, J. (1986). The quality of IEP objectives associated with placementon integrated versus segregated school sites. Journal of the Associationfor Persons with Severe Handicaps, 11, 125-130.Ibrahim Mamat. (1996). Reka bentuk dan pengurusan latihan-konsep dan amalan. KualaLumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.Institut Pendidikan Guru (IPG). (2011). Modul reka bentuk dan teknologi. Kuala Lumpur: IPG, KPM.Israel, G. D. (2013). Determining sample size 1, (April 2009), 15. Diperoleh daripadahttp://www.sut.ac.th/im/data/read6.pdf.Jackson, C. W., & Larkin, M. J. (2002). Teaching students to use grading rubrics.Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(1), 4045.Jaharah Abdul Ghani, Jaafar Sahari, & Ahmad kamal Ariffin Mohd.Ihsan. (2007). Pelaksanaanpenggunaan rubrik projek ilmiah program sarjana muda kejuruteraan mekanik dan pembuatan.Seminar Pendidikan Kejuruteraan dan Alam Bina , Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia., 7183. Diperoleh daripada www.ukm.my/p3k/images/sppb07/8.pdf.Jamaluddin Aziz, Fuzirah Hashim, & Norizan Abdul Razak. (2012). Integriti dankecememerlangan akademik: Memerangi plagiarisma di dalam kelas penulisan akademik. Ajtlhe,4(2), 9192.Janssen, G., Meier, V., & Trace, J. (2015). Building a better rubric: Mixed methodsrubric revision. Assessing Writing, 26, 5166. Diperoleh daripadahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2015.07.002Jemaah Nazir dan Jaminan Kualiti. (2017). Standard kualiti pendidikan Malaysiagelombang 2. Kuala Lumpur. Diperoleh daripada https://www.moe.gov.my/index.php/my/pemberitahuan/2017/3469-standard-kualiti-pendidikan-malaysia-gelombang-2-skpmg2Jensen, N. (2015). Making sense of standard error of measurement. Northwest Evaluation Association.Diperoleh daripada https://www.nwea.org/blog/2015/making-sense-of- standard-error-of-measurement/Joan, F. G. (2003). Designing rubrics for reading and language arts. USA: PearsonEducation Inc.Jonsson, A., & Panadero, E. (2017). The use and design of rubrics to support assessment forlearning. In D. Carless, S. M. Bridges, C. K. Y. Chan, & R. Glofcheski (Eds.), Scaling upAssessment for Learning in Higher Education (pp. 99111). Singapore: Springer Singapore.Diperoleh daripada https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3045- 1_7Jons on, A., & Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity andeducational consequences. Educational Research Review. Diperoleh daripadahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002.Kamaruzaman Moidunny. (2013). Artikel 14: Penilaian program tinjauan terhadap konsep danmodel-model berkaitan. Institut Aminuddin Baki.Kamaruzzaman Abdul Manan, Shuhaida Md Nor, & Bahiyah Omar. (2013). Model PenilaianKirkpatrick. Malaysian Journal of Communication, 29(2), 3150.Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (KPM). (2006). Pelan induk pembangunan pendidikan 2006-2010. KualaLumpur: KPM.Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (KPM). (2012). Panduan pelaksanaan kerja kursus Institut Pendidikan Guru. Diperoleh daripadahttp://jpmipgmtaa.webs.com/Kerja_Kursus/Panduan Pelaksanaan Kerja KursusMEI2012_Cyberjaya.pdf.Kirby, N. F., & Downs, C. T. (2007). Self-assessment and the disadvantaged student:Potential for encouraging self-regulated learning? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(4), 475494. Diperoleh daripadahttps://doi.org/10.1080/02602930600896464.Kirkpatrick, D. L. (2000). Evaluating training programs: The four levels - the ASTDhandbook of training design and delivery. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. . (2005). Evaluating training programs (3rd ed.).San Francisco, CA: Berret-Koehler Publishers, Inc.Kleiman, S. (2004). Phenomenology: to wonder and search for meanings. Nurse Researcher. Diperolehdaripada https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2004.07.11.4.7.c6211Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling (3rd ed.).New York: The Guilford Press.Kocaklah, M. S. (2010). Development and application of a rubric for evaluatingstudents performance on Newtons laws of motion. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(2), 146164. Diperoleh daripadahttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-009-9188-9Krause, K.-L. (2001). The university essay writing experience: A pathway for academic integrationduring transition. Higher Education Research & Development, 20(2), 147168. Diperolehdaripada https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360123586Krejcie, R. V, & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38(1), 607610. Diperoleh daripadahttps://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308.Kruse, K. (2011). Introduction to instructional design and the ADDIE model. Diperolehpada September 1, 2016, daripada http://www.transformativedesigns.com/id_systems.htmlKusaeri Suprananto. (2012). Pengukuran dan penilaian pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.Kyriakides, L., & Creemers, B. P. . (2008). Using a multidimensional approach tomeasure the impact of classroom-level factors upon student achievement: A study testing thevalidity of the dynamic model. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19(2),183205.Landis, J. & Kosh, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.Biometrics, 33, 159174.Latifa Ammang, Rahman Asfah, Arifuddin, H., Jabu Baso, & Nur Rafiah. (2015). Developinga practical rating rubric of speaking test for university students of english inParepare, Indonesia. English Language Teaching, 8(6), 167177.Lau, A. M. S. (2016). Formative good, summative bad? A review of the dichotomy in assessmentliterature. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 40(4), 509525. Diperoleh daripadahttps://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2014.984600Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York: Harper & Row.Lexell, J. E., & Downham, D. Y. (2005). How to assess the reliability of measurements inrehabilitation. American Journal of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation, 84(9), 719 723.Ling, S. S., Lan, O. S., & Shuki Isman. (2009). Pentaksiran pembelajaran pelajar:Amalan Guru-guru di Malaysia. Malaysian Education Deans Council Journal (MEDC)., 5(1),122.Livingston, M. (2012). The infamy of grading rubrics. English Journal, 102(2), 108.Diperoleh daripadahttps://liberty.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV07T8MwED5BKxAL0ALhVckTW0rtvJwBIVQoRRQJoQ5ske3YU0lp00qUX885TcpDsDFFloco9_jufDnfB0Awa5CMioAJxoWmTIRKShXqmHpGCyO_lwWg4mstVVshYgHT6VjZCvk59TAyWaLc-J14lrOKPtvtSLQECWxQnpBLeXkOtQpY7F104fO4wqXLbMacDougall, M., Riley, S. C., Cameron, H. S., & McKinstry, B. (2008). Halos and horns in theassessment of undergraduate medical students: A consistency-based approach. Journal of AppliedQuantitative Methods (JAQM), 3(2), 116128.Mag in, D. M., Briesch, A. M., Chafouleas, S. M., Ferguson, T. D., & Clark, C. (2014).A comparison of rubrics for identifying empirically supported practices with single-case research. Journal of Behavioral Education, 23(2), 287311. Diperoleh daripadahttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-013-9187-z.Mahzan Arsad. (2008). Pendidikan literasi Bahasa Melayu: Strategi perancangan danperlaksanaan. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications & Distributors Sdn. Bhd.Mann, K. V. (2011). Theoretical perspectives in medical education: Past experience and future possibilities. Medical Education, 45(1), 6068. Diperoleh daripadahttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03757.x.Mark, M. M., Henry, G. T., & Julnes, G. (1999). Toward an integrative framework for evaluationpractice. The American Journal of Evaluation, 20(2), 177198. Diperoleh daripadahttps://doi.org/10.1016/S1098-2140(99)00025-9.Marohaini Yusoff. (1996). Perlakuan dan proses mengarang pelajar melayu dalam bilik darjahtingkatan empat- satu kajian kes. Universiti Malaya Kuala Lumpur.Marohaini Yusoff. (2001). Penyelidikan kualitatif: Pengalaman kerja lapangan kajian.Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Malaya.Masura Rahmat, & Madihah Mohd Saudi. (2008). E-Learning assessment application based onBloom Taxonomy. International Journal of Learning, 14(9), 111. Diperoleh daripadahttp://libproxy.unitec.ac.nz:2048/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh&AN=28652177&site=ehost-live&scope=site.Mavin, S., Lee, L., & Robson, F. (2010). The evaluation of learning and development in the workplace, 30. Diperoleh daripada https://www.northumbria.ac.uk/static/5007/hrpdf/hefce/hefce_litreview.pdf.McKenzie, J. (2013). What is plagiarism? Simon Frazer University Library. Canada: SimonFrazer University Library.McMilllan, J. H. (2008). Educational research: Fundamental for the consumer. USA: PearsonEducation Inc.McVee, M., & Dickson, B. (2002). Creating a rubric to examine literacy software for the primarygrades. The reading Teacher , 635-639.Md Fadzil Hasbollah. (2002). Kaedah penulisan ilmiah yang diterima pakai oleh pensyarahJPTV KUiTTHO. Kolej Universiti Tun Husseiin Onn. Diperoleh daripadahttps://eprint.UTHM.edu.my/1215.Mearma , K. A. (2013). A statistical estimate of the validity and reliability of a rubricdeveloped by Connecticuts State Education Resources Center to evaluate thequality of Individualized Education Programs for students with disabilities. Tersedia dalamProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. Diperoleh daripadahttps://search.proquest.com/docview/1493904432?accountid=13155.Menndez-Varela, J. L., & Gregori-Giralt, E. (2016). The contribution of rubrics to the validityof performance assessment: A study of the conservationrestoration and designundergraduate degrees. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(2), 228244.Diperoleh daripada https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.998169Merriam, S. B. (2001). Qualitative research and case study applications in education.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Merriam, S. B., Caffarella, R. ., & Baumgartner, L. . (2009). Learning in adulthood: Acomprehensive guide. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.Mertens, D. M. (2005). Research and evaluation in education and psychology:Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (2nd ed.).Thousands Oaks, CA: SAGE Publication Ltd.Mertler, C. A., & Charles, C. M. (2008). Introduction to educational research (6th ed.).Boston: Pearson Education Inc.Metfessel, N. S., & Michael, W. B. (1967). A paradigm involving multiple criterionmeasures for the evaluation of the effectiviness of school program. JournalEducation, Psychological and Assessment., 27, 931943.Meyer, J. P., Srinivas, E. S., Lal, J. B., & Topolnytsky, L. (2007). Employee commitment andsupport for an organizational change: Test of the three-component model in two cultures. Journalof Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80, 185211. Diperoleh daripadahttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1348/096317906X118685/epdf?r3_referer=wol&tracking_action=preview_click&show_checkout=1&purchase_referrer=www.google.com&purchase_site_license=LICENSE_DENIEDMiles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis. California: SAGE PublicationLtd.Mohamad Najib Abdul Ghafar. (1999). Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Skudai: Universiti TeknologiMalaysia.Mohamad Najib Abdul Ghafar. (2011). Pembinaan analisis dan ujian bilik darjah. Johor Bahru:Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.Mohamed Najib Abdul Ghafar, Sanitah Mohd. Yusof, Razak Idris, Noraini Mohd Noor,Halijah Ibrahim, & A. Hadi Bunyamin. (2012). Panduan asas pentaksiran FakultiPendidikan UTM. Johor Bahru.Mohammad Sahari Nordin. (2002). Pengujian dan penaksiran di bilik darjah. Kuala Lumpur:Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia.Mohammed Sani Ibrahim, & Mohd Izham Mohd Hamzah. (2012). Pengurusan perubahanmakro dalam pendidikan. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.Mohd. Majid Konting. (2004). Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan. (7th ed.). KualaLumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.Mohd. Rabeh Abdullah. (2000). Penilaian pelaksanaan kurikulum Al-Azhar di Sekolah MenengahJabatan Agama Islam Selangor. (Tesis Sarjana Pendidikan tidak diterbitkan). KualaLumpur: Universiti Malaya.Mohd Jizat Abdol, Abdul Razak Idris, & Jessnor Elmy. (2006). Teknologi pengajaran danpembelajaran. Johor: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.Mohd Khairuddin Abdullah, & Halimah Laji. (2014). Kepimpinan pengajaran dan sikap guru Bahasa Melayu. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu; Malay Language Education (MyLEJ), 4(1), 4858.Mohd Salleh Lebar. (2007). Pentadbiran pendidikan & pendidikan di Malaysia. Petaling Jaya: AddisonWesley Longman Malaysia Sdn. Bhd.Mokhtar Ismail. (2009). Pentaksiran pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.Molenda, M., Reigeluth, C. M., & Nelson, L. M. (2006). Instructional design.Encyclopedia of Cognitive Scienc. Wiley Online Library. Diperoleh daripadahttps://doi.org/DOI: 10.1002/0470018860.s00683Morse, J. M., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K., & Spiers, J. (2002). Verification Strategies forEstablishing Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research. International Journal of QualitativeMethods, 1(2), 1322. Diperoleh daripada https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690200100202Morse, J. M. (2015). Data were saturated. Qualitative Health Research, 25(5), 587588.Diperoleh daripada https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315576699Mustapha, A., Samsudin, N. A., Arbaiy, N., Mohamed, R., & Hamid, I. R. (2016). Genericassessment rubrics for computer programming courses. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 15(1), 5361. Diperoleh daripadahttps://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004Neves, P. (2009). Readiness for change: Contributions for employees level of individualchange and turnover intentions. Journal of Change Management, 9(2), 215231.Diperoleh daripada https://doi.org/10.1080/14697010902879178Newton, J. M., Billett, S., & Ockerby, C. M. (2009). Journeying through clinicalplacements - An examination of six student cases. Nurse Education Today, 29(6), 630634.Diperoleh daripada https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2009.01.009Ngalim Purwanto. (2010). Prinsip-prinsip dan teknik evaluasi pengajaran. Bandung: RemajaRosdakarya.Nishisato, N., & Torii, Y. (1970). Effects of categorizing continous normal distributions on theproduct-moment correlation. Japanese Psychological Research, 13, 4549.Nor Azni Abdul Aziz. (2015). Hubungan antara kepimpinan instruktional pengetua dengan komitmen untuk perubahan guru serta peranan kesediaan terhadap perubahan gurusebagai mediator dalam melaksnakan pentaksiran berasaskan sekolah (PBS). (Tesis PhD tidak diterbitkan), Fakulti Pengajian Pendidikan, Universiti Putra Malaysia.Nor Effyza Roslan. (2013). Pelaksanaan transformasi program pendidikan asasvokasional di sekolah menengah Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. Universiti Tun Hussein OnnMalaysia.Nor Junaidah, & Mohammad Aziz. (2012). Pengenalan pembangunan sahsiah. Tanjong Malim: EmeritusPublications.Noraini Idris. (2005). Pedagogi dalam pendidikan Matematik. Selangor: UtusanPublications Sdn. Bhd.Norasmah Othman. (2002). Keberkesanan program keusahawanan remaja di sekolah menengah. (Tesis PHDtidak diterbitkan). Serdang: Universiti Putra Malaysia.Norkhalid Salimin, Julismah Jani, Nur Akmal Ishak, Sadzali Hassan, Gunathevan Elumalai,Ong Kuan Boon, & Mohd Izwan Shahril. (2014). Validity and reliability of comprehensive assessmentinstruments for professional skills in field and court sport among major studentscoaching based on Model K. BEST: International Journal of Humanities, Arts, Medicine andSciences (BEST: IJHAMS), 2(4), 3744. Diperoleh daripadahttp://www.bestjournals.in/view_archives.php?year=2014_73_2&id=73&jtype=2&p age=2Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory (NWREL). (2008). 6+1 trait writing assessmentsummary study results Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory. Portland: NWREL.Novak, J. D., Mintzes, J. J., & Wandersee, J. H. (2005). Assessing science understanding.San Diego, CA: Elsever Inc.Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw- Hill Inc. Diperoleh daripada http://scholar.google.com.vn/scholar?q=Psychometric+Theory+3rd&btnG=&hl=vi& as_sdt=0,5#0Nurhayati Christina Abdullah. (2005). Adaptasi pembelajaran bahasa Melayu di IPTS. Tesis Phdtidak diterbitkan) Serdang: Universiti Putra Malaysia.Nurul Hakim. (2005). Pedoman penulisan tugas akhir. Jakarta: Dikgutentis.Ogle, D. (1986). K-W-L?: A teaching model that develops active reading text ofexpository text. The Reading Teacher, 39(6), 564570. Diperoleh daripadahttps://doi.org/10.1598/RT.39.6.11Open Universiti Malaysia (OUM). (2014). Pengukuran, pengujian dan penilaian.Pengukuran, Pengujian Dan Penilaian. Diperoleh daripadahttp://cikguamirul.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/pengujian_pengukuran_penilaian.pd f.Ornstein, A. C., & Hunkins, F. P. (2013). Curriculum: Foundations, principles, andissues (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education Inc.Orsmond, P., Maw, S. J., Park, J. R., Gomez, S., & Crook, A. C. (2013). Movingfeedback forward: Theory to practice. Assessment and Evaluation in HigherEducation, 38(2), 240252. Diperoleh daripada https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2011.625472.Othman Lebar. (2006). Penyelidikan kualitatif: Pengenalan kepada teori dan metod.Tanjong Malim: Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.Othman Lebar. (2012). Penyelidikan kualitatif: Pengenalan kepada teori dan metod.Tanjong Malim: Penerbit Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.Pamela, F. (2015). Creating grading rubrics for writing assignments. Diperoleh August 21,2017, daripada http://writing.umn.edu/tww/responding/rubrics.html.Panadero, E., & Jonsson, A. (2013). The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposesrevisited: A review. Educational Research Review. Diperoleh daripadahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.002.Panadero, E., & Romero, M. (2014). To rubric or not to rubric? The effects of self-assessment on self-regulation, performance and self-efficacy. Assessment inEducation: Principles, Policy and Practice. Diperoleh daripadarg/10.1080/0969594X.2013.877872.Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods integrating theory andpractice (4th ed.). California: SAGE Publication Ltd.Payne, D. . (1994). Designing educational project and program evaluations: A practical overviewbased on research and experience. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.Peeters, M. J., Schmude, K. A., & Steinmiller, C. L. (2014). Inter-rater reliabilityand false confidence in precision: Using standard error of measurement within pharmD admissions essay rubric development. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 6(2), 298303. Diperoleh daripadahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2013.11.014Pinchok, N., & Brandt, W. C. (2009). Connecting formative assessment research topractice?: An introductory guide for educators. Learning Point Associates, 24.Popham, W.J. (1997), Whats wrong and whats right with rubrics, Educational Leadership, 55(2),ms. 72-5.Posner, G. J. (2004). Analysing the curriculum (3rd ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill Inc.Preston, C. C., & Colman, A. M. (2000). Optimal number of response categories in rating scales:Reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta Psychologica, 104(1), 115. Diperoleh daripada https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00050-5.Priest, S. (2001). A program evaluation primer. Journal of Experiential Education, 24(1), 3440.Diperoleh daripada https://doi.org/10.1177/105382590102400108.Prins, F. J., Kleijn, R. de, & Tartwijk, J. van. (2017). Students use of a rubricfor research theses. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(1), 128150.Diperoleh daripadahttps://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1085954.Race, P., Brown, S., & Smith, B. (2005). 500 tips on assessment. Oxon: RoutledgeFalmer.Raimes, A. (1983). Techniques in teaching writing. New York: Oxford University Press.Ramlan Mustafa, Zaharah Hussin, & Saedah Siraj. (2016). Ketidakjujuran akademik dalamkalangan mahasiswa muslim di Malaysia: Analisis perbandingan tahun 2014- 2015. JuKu JURNALKURIKULUM & PENGAJARAN ASIA PASIFIK, 4(1), 4156.Ravichandran Vengadasamy. (2004). Responding to student writing: Motivate, not criticise.GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 2(2), 1927/RIS. Diperolehdaripada http://www.fpbahasa.ukm.my/linguistics/Gema/GemaVol2.1.2002No3.pdfRayment, T. (2011). 101 senarai penting tentang pentaksiran. (P. Aziah Salleh, Ed.).Kuala Lumpur: Institut Terjemahan Negara Malaysia.Reddy, M. Y. (2011). Design and development of rubrics to improve assessment outcomes:A pilot study in a Masters Level Business Program in India. Quality Assurance in Education, 19(1), 84104. Diperoleh daripadahttps://doi.org/10.1108/09684881111107771Reddy, M. Y., & Andrade, H. (2010). A review of rubric use in higher education.Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(4), 435448. Diperoleh daripadahttps://doi.org/10.1080/02602930902862859Reeves, M. (1996). Evaluating of training. (Petaling J). Pelanduk Publications (M) Sdn.Bhd.Reynolds-Keefer, L. (2010). Rubric-referenced assessment in teacher preparation: Anopportunity to learn by using practical assessment. Research & Evaluation, 15(8), 19.Diperoleh daripada http://www.pareonline.net/pdf/v15n8.pdf.Ries, J. D., Echternach, J. L., Nof, L., & Gagnon Blodgett, M. (2009). Test-retestreliability and minimal detectable change scores for the timed up & go test, the six-minutewalk test, and gait speed in people with Alzheimer disease. Physical Therapy, 89(6),569579.Rink, J. E. (2002). Teaching physical education for learning 4th ed New York: McGraw Hill.Riyadi, & Deddy Supriyadi Bratakusumah. (2005). Perencanaan pembangunan daerah.Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.Roosfa Hashim. (2011). Pembangunan jurnal ilmiah Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit UniversitiMalaya.Robinson, B. (2002). The CIPP approach to evaluation. COLLIT Project.Rubin, S. (1982). Performance appraisal: A guide to better supervisor evaluationprocesses. In Panel Resource Paper No. 7, in National Society for Internships and ExperientialEducation. Washingto, DC.Ruston, A., & Tavabie, A. (2011). An evaluation of a training placement in generalpractice for paramedic practitioner students: Improving patient-centred care through greater interprofessional understanding and supporting the development of autonomouspractitioners. Quality in Primary Care, 19(3), 167173.Sald na, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researches (2nd Eds). ThaousandOaks, CA: SAGE Publication Ltd.Scheer, A., Noweski, C., & Meinel, C. (2012). Transforming constructivist learning into action:Design thinking in education. Design and Technology Education, 17, 819. Diperoleh daripadahttp://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.liv.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ996067&site=eds-live&scope=siteSchwab, J. . (2004). The practical: A language for curriculum. In D. J. Flinders & S. J. Thornton(Eds.), The Curriculum studies reader (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.Shane, H. (2012). How to use the CIPP program for model for program evaluation.Sheila, P. L., Nuraihan Mat Daud, & Noor Lide Abu Kassim. (2016). Development and initialargument-based validation of a scoring rubric used in the assessment of L2 writingelectronic portfolios. Assessing Writing, 30, 4462. Diperoleh daripadahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2016.06.001.Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessingrater realibiality. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 420428.Sidek Mohd Noah. (2002). Reka bentuk penyelidikan, falsafah, teori dan praktis.Serdang: Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia.Sim, J., & Wright, C. C. (2005). The Kappa Statistic in reliability studies: Use,interpretation, and sample size requirements. Physical Therapy, 85(3), 257268.Simkins, M. (1999). Designing great rubrics. Technology and Learning, 20, 2333.Simon, M., & Forgette-Giroux, R. (2001). A rubric for scoring postsecondary academic skills.Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(18), 139143.Sistem penilaian holistik. (2010). Utusan Malaysia, ms. 3.Sivachandarlingam Sundara Raja. (2002). Pemikiran dan penulisan ilmiah. KualaLumpur: Utusan Publications & Distributors Sdn. Bhd.Smith, S., Kogan, J. R., Berman, N. B., Dell, M. S., Brock, D. M., & Robins, L. S.(2016). The development and preliminary validation of a rubric to assess medical studentswritten summary statements in virtual patient cases. Academic Medicine, 91(1), 94100. Diperoleh daripadahttps://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000800.Sofer, G., & Ahnfelt, M. (2007). Advances in the validation of chromatographic processes. BioPharmInternational.Sou a, D. A. (1995). How the brain learns. Reston, VA: The National Association ofSecondary School Principals.Stake, R. E. (1967). The countenance of educational evaluation. Teachers CollegeRecord, 68, 523540.Stake, R. E. (2004). Standards-based and responsive evaluation. USA: SAGEPublication Ltd.Stake, R. E. (2005). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (3rd ed., pp. 443 466). ThousandsOaks, CA: SAGE Publication Ltd.Stake, R.E (2010)., Qualitative research : Studying how thing work. Austria : National Library ofAustralia.Steedle, J. T., & Ferrara, S. (2016). Evaluating comparative judgement as an approach to essayscoring. Applied Measurement in Education, 29(3), 211223. Diperoleh daripadahttps://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2016.1171769.Stefl-Mabry, J. (2004). Building rubrics into powerful learning assessment tools.Knowledge Quest, 32(5), 2125.Stergar, C. (2005). Performance tasks, checklists, and rubrics. USA: Pearson Education IncStevens, D. D., & Levi, A. J. (2013). Introduction to rubric (2nd ed.). Sterling, VA:Stylus Publishing.Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basic of qualitative research: Grounded theoryprocedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publication Ltd.Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1999). Basics of qualitative research techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd.). London: SAGE Publication Ltd.Streiner, D. L., & Norman, G. R. (2007). Health measurement scale: A practical guide to theirdevelopment and use. United States: Oxford University Press.Stufflebeam, D. L. (1986). The CIPP model for program evaluation. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.Sugiyono. (2011). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta.Suchman, E. A. (1967). Evaluative research. New York: Russel Sage Foundation. Sullivan, W. M.(2000). New agenda for higher education. Liverpool: GeorgeOrigination.Sumaryanta. (2015). Pedoman penskoran. Indonesian Digital Journal of Mathematicsand Education., 2(3), 181190.Sundeen, T. H. (2014). Instructional rubrics: Effects of presentation options on writing quality. Assessing Writing, 21, 7488. Diperoleh daripadahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2014.03.003Surayah Zaidon, Ayob, A., & Othman Ikhsan. (2014). Pembinaan rubrik penilaian penulisankanak-kanak. Jurnal Pendidikan Bitara UPSI, 7, 8695.Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. (4th ed.). Boston: Allynand Bacon Inc.Tan, H. T. (2010). Peranan pengetua sebagai fasilitator perubahan dalam mengurusintergrasi ICT sebagai satu inovasi pendidikan. (Tesis PhD tidak diterbitkan), UniversitiSains Malaysia.Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social andbehavioral research. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 77100. Diperoleh daripadahttps://doi.org/10.1177/2345678906292430Tennant, C., Boonkrong, M., & Roberts, P. A. B. (2002). The design of a training programmemeasurement model. Journal of European Industrial Training, 26(5), 230240. Diperoleh daripadahttps://doi.org/10.1108/03090590210424902Thaler, N., Kazemi, E., & Huscher, C. (2009). Developing a rubric to assess studentlearning outcomes using a class assignment. Teaching of Psychology, 36(2), 113116. Diperoleh daripada https://doi.org/10.1080/00986280902739305The States University. (2006). Introduction to instructional design. Diperoleh pada May 20, 2009,daripada http://itle.okstate.edu/FD/online-teaching/Intro-to-id.html.Timmerman, B. E. C., Strickland, D. C., Johnson, L. R., & Payne, J. R. (2011).Development of a universal rubric for assessing undergraduates scientificreasoning skills using scientific writing. Assessment & Evaluation in HigherEducation, 36(5), 509547. Diperoleh daripada https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903540991.Trianto. (2007). Model-model pembelajaran inovatif berorientasikan konstruktivistik.Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka.Turner, J., & Shellard, E. (2004). Developing and using instructional rubric. Arlington:Educational Research Service.Tyle , R. W. (1950). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: Universityof Chicago Press.Vista, A., Care, E., & Griffin, P. (2015). A new approach towards marking large-scale complexassessments: Developing a distributed marking system that uses an automaticallyscaffolding and rubric-targeted interface for guided peer-review. Assessing Writing, 24, 115. Diperoleh daripadahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2014.11.001Vitek, C. R., Dale, J. C., Homburger, H. A., Bryant, S. C., Saenger, A. K., & Karon, B. S. (2014).Development and initial validation of a project-based rubric to assess the systems-basedpractice competency of residents in the clinical chemistry rotation of a pathology residency.Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 138(6), 809813. Diperoleh daripadahttps://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2013-0046-OAVroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: Wiley Online Library.Wakeford, R., Southgate, L., & Wass, V. (1995). Improving oral examinations: Selecting,training, and monitoring examiners for the MRCGP. Source BMJ: British MedicalJournal, 311(7010), 931935. Diperoleh daripada http://www.jstor.org/stable/29729002Walinga, J. (2008). Toward a theory of change readiness: The roles of appraisal, focus, andperceived control. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 44. Diperoleh daripadahttps://doi.org/10.1177/0021886308318967Walker, H. J., Armenakis, A. A., & Bernerth, J. B. (2007). Factors influencing organizational change efforts: An integrative investigation of changecontent, context, process and individual differences. Journal of Organizational ChangeManagement, 20(6), 761773.Wang, W. (2016). Using rubrics in student self-assessment: student perceptions in theEnglish as a foreign language writing context. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, ms. 113. Diperoleh daripadahttps://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1261993.Weaver, M. R. (2006). Do students value feedback? Student perceptions of tutors written responses. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(3), 379394. Diperoleh daripadahttps://doi.org/10.1080/02602930500353061Wee, L. C. (2012). Pembelajaran visual dalam usaha meningkatkan tahap kefahaman muridprasekolah. In Seminar Penyelidikan Tindakan IPG KBL (pp. 8597). IPG KBL.Weiner, B. (1979). A theory of motivation for some classroom experiences. Journal of Education & Psychology, 71(1), 325. Diperoleh daripadahttps://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.71.1.3Weiner, B. (2009). A theory of organizational readiness for change. ImplementationScience?: IS, 4(1), 67. Diperoleh daripada https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-67Whitaker, A. (2009). Academic writing guide 2010?: A step-by-step guide to writingacademic papers. Bratislava: City University of Seattle.Whittaker, C. R., Salend, S. J., & Duhaney, D. (2001). Creating instructional rubrics for inclusiveclassrooms. TEACHING Exceptional Children November/December, 34, 813.Wiersma, W. (2000). Research method in education: An introduction. Needham Heights, NY: Allyn andBacon Inc.Wiggins, G. (1998). Education assessment: Designing assessment to inform and improve studentperformance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Wiliam, Dylan, & Thompson, M. (2007). Integrating assessment with learning: What will it take tomake it work? Dalam C. A. Dwyer (Ed.), The Future of Assessment: Shaping Teaching andLearning (pp. 5382). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.William, W. (2000). Research in education: An introduction. Boston: Allyn and Bacon Inc.William M.K. Trochim. (2006). Research method knowledge based. Diperoleh pada November 27, 2016, daripada http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/unitanal.php.Winstone, N. E., Nash, R. A., Rowntree, J., & Menezes, R. (2016). What do students want most fromwritten feedback information? Distinguishing necessities from luxuries using a budgetingmethodology. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(8), 12371253. Diperoleh daripadahttps://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1075956.Wolfe, P. (2010). Brain matters: Translating research into classroom practice (2nd ed.).Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.Wollenschlger, M., Hattie, J., Machts, N., Mller, J., & Harms, U. (2016). What makes rubricseffective in teacher-feedback? Transparency of learning goals is not enough. ContemporaryEducational Psychology, 4445, 111. Diperoleh daripadahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.11.003Wor hen, B. R., & Sanders, J. R. (1987). Educational evaluation: Alternative approaches alguidelines. New York: Longmans.Worthington, R. L., & Whittaker, T. A. (2006). Scale development research a contentanalysis and recommendations for best practices. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(6),806838.Wragg, E. C. (2001). Assessment and learning in the secondary school. London: RouledgeFalmer.Yahya Buntat, Muhammad Rashid Rajuddin, Kandar Selamat, & Jailani Damsuki. (2003).Keberkesanan pelaksanaan mata pelajaran komponen kemahiran hidup (sains pertanian) disekolah-sekolah menengah daerah Pontian berdasarkan model KIPP. In Seminar Kebangsaan Memperkasakan Sistem Pendidikan. Diperoleh daripadahttp://eprints.utm.my/2280/1/Kertas_Kerja_2_(Keberkesanan_SP).pdf.Yan, C. (2012). We can only change in a small way: A study of secondary Englishteachers implementation of curriculum reform in China. Journal of Educational Change,13(4), 431447. Diperoleh daripada https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-012-9186-1.Yuan, M. (2015). Does audience matter? A study of how people apply and perceivequality rubrics when evaluating open educational resources. ProQuest Disertations & Theses Global. Diperoleh daripadahttps://search.proquest.com/docview/1754353133?accountid=13155.Zainal Ariffin. (2010). Model-model evaluasi program. Universitias Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.Zainul Asmawi. (2001). Alternative assessment applied approach. Jakarta: DiktiDepdiknas.Zainuriyah Abdul Khatab. (2012). A study on English teachers assessment practices on theschool-based assessment for English Language in Malaysia. Diperoleh daripadahttps://www.researchgate.net/profile/Zainuriyah_Abdul_Khatab/publicationsZamri Mahamod. (2012). Inovasi pengajaran dan pembelajaran dalam pendidikan Bahasa Melayu.Tanjung Malim: Penerbit Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.Zanaton Haji Iksan. (2011). Amalan penyoalan lisan guru kimia dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaranelektrokimia. Kuala Lumpur: Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Malaya.Zimmaro, D. M. (n.d.). Writing good multiple-choice exams. University of Texas, (512).Zimmaro, D. M. (2004). Developing grading rubrics. Diperoleh daripadahttp://slo.sbcc.edu/wp-content/uploads/developing_grading_rubrics.pdfZim erman, B. J., & Moylan, A. R. (2009). Self-regulation: When metacognition andmotivation intersect. In D.J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Theeducational psychology series. Handbook of metacognition in education (ms. 299315). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

Similar Items