Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penerimaan dan penggunaan pendekatan pembelajaran teradun dalam kalangan guru di Malaysia

Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penerimaan dan penggunaan pendekatan pembelajaran teradun dalam kalangan guru di Malaysia

Kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengenal pasti faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi NiatTingkah Laku (NTL) dan Tingkah Laku Penggunaan (TLP) bagi membentuk model konseptualpenerimaan dan penggunaan pendekatan Pembelajaran Teradun (Blended Learning Acceptance andUse Model- BeLAUM). Kajian juga menilai kesan pe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mohd Azli Yeop
Format: thesis
Language:zsm
Published: 2018
Subjects:
LB Theory and practice of education
Online Access:https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5322
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:5322
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
collection UPSI Digital Repository
language zsm
topic LB Theory and practice of education
spellingShingle LB Theory and practice of education
Mohd Azli Yeop
Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penerimaan dan penggunaan pendekatan pembelajaran teradun dalam kalangan guru di Malaysia
description Kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengenal pasti faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi NiatTingkah Laku (NTL) dan Tingkah Laku Penggunaan (TLP) bagi membentuk model konseptualpenerimaan dan penggunaan pendekatan Pembelajaran Teradun (Blended Learning Acceptance andUse Model- BeLAUM). Kajian juga menilai kesan pemboleh ubah mediator dan pemboleh ubah moderatorterhadap hubungan antara konstruk kajian. Pendekatan reka bentuk kaedah bercampur - penerokaanberturut (Sequential exploratory- mixed methods research design) digunakan untuk mencapai enam objektif kajian.Pembentukan konstruk dan instrumen kajian adalah berdasarkan tinjauan literaturterhadap model-teori penerimaan teknologi terdahulu, hasil analisis temubual kumpulan fokus sertapenilaian panel pakar. Bagi pengumpulan data utama kajian, seramai 851 orang guru telahmemberi makum balas melalui soal selidik penilaian kendiri. Ujian statistik StructuralEquation Modeling (SEM) digunakan sebagai prosedur analisis statistik utama kajian bagimelaksanakan anggaran parameter dan pengujian model. Dapatan utama kajian mendedahkanbahawa Jangkaan Penggunaan (JPG), Pengaruh Sosial (PS), Keadaan Kemudahan (KK) danEfikasi Guru (EG) adalah faktor yang signifikan mempengaruhi NTL dan TLP. Secara keseluruhannya, analisis SEM membuktikan bahawa pemboleh ubah BeLAUM telah menyumbangsebanyak 73.3% varians bagi NTL dan 65.1% varians bagi TLP. Dapatan turut menunjukkan bahawa KKadalah pemboleh ubah mediator dalam hubungan antara EG dan NTL. Jantina,pengalaman dan beban tugas merupakan pemboleh ubah moderator dalam model kajian. Kesimpulannya, kajian ini telah dapat menjelaskan faktor-faktor sebenar yang mempengaruhi guru untukmelaksanakan pendekatan Pembelajaran Teradun, di samping menyumbang kepada pemahaman terhadap teori-teori penerimaan teknologi secara kontekstual dengan kajian semasa berdasarkantetapan sistem pendidikan di Malaysia. Pembangunan model konseptual ini dijangka berupayamenawarkan panduan konstruktif kepada pengubal dasar, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia sertapihak berkepentingan lain untuk merencana pembangunan profesional keguruan dan seterusnyamenggalakkan amalan pembelajaran menggunakan pendekatan Pembelajaran Teradun yang lebih baik.
format thesis
qualification_name
qualification_level Doctorate
author Mohd Azli Yeop
author_facet Mohd Azli Yeop
author_sort Mohd Azli Yeop
title Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penerimaan dan penggunaan pendekatan pembelajaran teradun dalam kalangan guru di Malaysia
title_short Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penerimaan dan penggunaan pendekatan pembelajaran teradun dalam kalangan guru di Malaysia
title_full Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penerimaan dan penggunaan pendekatan pembelajaran teradun dalam kalangan guru di Malaysia
title_fullStr Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penerimaan dan penggunaan pendekatan pembelajaran teradun dalam kalangan guru di Malaysia
title_full_unstemmed Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penerimaan dan penggunaan pendekatan pembelajaran teradun dalam kalangan guru di Malaysia
title_sort faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penerimaan dan penggunaan pendekatan pembelajaran teradun dalam kalangan guru di malaysia
granting_institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
granting_department Fakulti Pembangunan Manusia
publishDate 2018
url https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5322
_version_ 1747833182542102528
spelling oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:53222020-10-22 Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penerimaan dan penggunaan pendekatan pembelajaran teradun dalam kalangan guru di Malaysia 2018 Mohd Azli Yeop LB Theory and practice of education Kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengenal pasti faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi NiatTingkah Laku (NTL) dan Tingkah Laku Penggunaan (TLP) bagi membentuk model konseptualpenerimaan dan penggunaan pendekatan Pembelajaran Teradun (Blended Learning Acceptance andUse Model- BeLAUM). Kajian juga menilai kesan pemboleh ubah mediator dan pemboleh ubah moderatorterhadap hubungan antara konstruk kajian. Pendekatan reka bentuk kaedah bercampur - penerokaanberturut (Sequential exploratory- mixed methods research design) digunakan untuk mencapai enam objektif kajian.Pembentukan konstruk dan instrumen kajian adalah berdasarkan tinjauan literaturterhadap model-teori penerimaan teknologi terdahulu, hasil analisis temubual kumpulan fokus sertapenilaian panel pakar. Bagi pengumpulan data utama kajian, seramai 851 orang guru telahmemberi makum balas melalui soal selidik penilaian kendiri. Ujian statistik StructuralEquation Modeling (SEM) digunakan sebagai prosedur analisis statistik utama kajian bagimelaksanakan anggaran parameter dan pengujian model. Dapatan utama kajian mendedahkanbahawa Jangkaan Penggunaan (JPG), Pengaruh Sosial (PS), Keadaan Kemudahan (KK) danEfikasi Guru (EG) adalah faktor yang signifikan mempengaruhi NTL dan TLP. Secara keseluruhannya, analisis SEM membuktikan bahawa pemboleh ubah BeLAUM telah menyumbangsebanyak 73.3% varians bagi NTL dan 65.1% varians bagi TLP. Dapatan turut menunjukkan bahawa KKadalah pemboleh ubah mediator dalam hubungan antara EG dan NTL. Jantina,pengalaman dan beban tugas merupakan pemboleh ubah moderator dalam model kajian. Kesimpulannya, kajian ini telah dapat menjelaskan faktor-faktor sebenar yang mempengaruhi guru untukmelaksanakan pendekatan Pembelajaran Teradun, di samping menyumbang kepada pemahaman terhadap teori-teori penerimaan teknologi secara kontekstual dengan kajian semasa berdasarkantetapan sistem pendidikan di Malaysia. Pembangunan model konseptual ini dijangka berupayamenawarkan panduan konstruktif kepada pengubal dasar, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia sertapihak berkepentingan lain untuk merencana pembangunan profesional keguruan dan seterusnyamenggalakkan amalan pembelajaran menggunakan pendekatan Pembelajaran Teradun yang lebih baik. 2018 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5322 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5322 text zsm closedAccess Doctoral Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Pembangunan Manusia Abdelmalak, M. M. M. (2015). Web 2.0 technologies and building online learning communities:Students perspectives. Online Learning, 19(2), 87106. Diambil darihttp://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1062942.pdfAbdulahi, A. A., NorHidayati, Z., & Elmi, A. H. (2012). An evaluation of virtual learningenvironment readiness in higher education institutions (HEIs). Journal of InformationSystems Research and Innovation, 2, 8694. Diambil dari http://seminar.utmspace.edu.my/jisri/Abdul Wahab, L. (2012). A modification of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use ofTechnology (UTAUT) from users perspectives of Telecentre in Nigeria. (Tesis Kedoktoran,Universiti Utara Malaysia). Diambil dari http://etd.uum.edu.my/3379/Abu-Al-Aish, A., & Love, S. (2013). Factors influencing students acceptance of m-learning: Aninvestigation in higher education. International Review of Research in Open and DistanceLearning, 14(5), 82107. Diambil dari http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/viewFile/1631/2749Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Dalam Orgnizational Behavior and HumanDecision Processes 50 (hal. 179211). Academic Press, Inc. http://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-TAl-Najjar, G. M. (2012). Mobile information systems: An empirical analysis of the determinantsof mobile commerce acceptance in Jordan. (Tesis Kedoktoran). Universiti Utara Malaysia,Kedah, Malaysia.Alammary, A., Sheard, J., & Carbone, A. (2014). Blended learning in higher education: Threedifferent design approaches. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(4), 440454. Diambil dari http://ajet.org.au/index.php/AJET/article/view/693/1061Alavifar, A., Karimimalayer, M., & Mohd Khairol, A. (2012). Structural equation modeling VSmultiple regression. Engineering Science and Technology: An International Journal(ESTIJ), 2(2), 326329. Diambil dari http://www.estij.org/papers/vol2no22012/5vol2no2.pdfAlghanmi, S. (2014). Investigating the interpersonal and contextual factors govern Saudilecturers motivation in creating innovative blended learning environment that web 2.0-based. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(3), 96106. Diambil darihttp://www.tojet.net/articles/v13i3/13311.pdfAlharbi, S., & Drew, S. (2014). Using the technology acceptance model in understandingacademics behavioural intention to use learning management systems. InternationalJournal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 5(1), 143155. Diambil darihttp://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.428.9465&rep=rep1&type=pdfAli, M. F., Joyes, G., & Ellison, L. (2013). Using blended learning to enhance students cognitivepresence. Proceedings - 2013 International Conference on Informatics and CreativeMultimedia, ICICM 2013, 202208. http://doi.org/10.1109/ICICM.2013.42Almasaeid, T. F. (2014). The effect of using blended learning strategy on achievement and 9thgrade students. European Scientific Journal, 10(31), 133145. Diambil darihttp://eujournal.org/index.php/esj/article/viewFile/4573/4370Alotaibi, K. N. R. (2013). The effect of blended learning on developing critical thinking skills.Education Journal, 2(4), 176185. http://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20130204.21Alshibly, H. (2014). An empirical investigation into factors influencing the intention to use elearningsystem: An extended technology acceptance model. British Journal of AppliedScience & Technology, 4(17), 24402457. Diambil darihttp://www.journalrepository.org/media/journals/BJAST_5/2014/Apr/Alshibly4172014BJAST10033_1.pdfAlthunibat, A. (2015). Determining the factors influencing students intention to use m-learningin Jordan higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 6571.http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.046Ana Haziqah, A. R. (2014). Teachers perception towards virtual learning environment. (TesisSarjana). Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor, Malaysia.Aravamudhan, N. R., & Krishnaveni, R. (2015). Establishing and reporting content validityevidence of new Training and Development Capacity Building Scale (TDCBS).Management: Journal of Contemporary Management, 20(1), 131158. Diambil darihttp://hrcak.srce.hr/141598?lang=enAttuquayefio, S. N., & Addo, H. (2014). Using the UTAUT model to analyze students ICTadoption. Journal of Technology, 10(3), 7586. Diambil dari http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1059042.pdfAzlah, M. J., & Fariza, K. (2014). Keberkesanan kemahiran komunikasi di kalangan guru dalampenggunaan persekitaran pembelajaran maya (Frog VLE). Dalam K. Fariza, D. Md Yusoff,& A. R. Mohd Jasmy (Ed.), Aliran Terkini Dalam Pengajaran Sumber Dan TeknologiMaklumat:Impaknya ke atas Penyelidikan dalam Pendidikan 2014 (hal. 6369). Bangi:Penerbit Fakulti Pendidikan, UKM.Azlina, A. B., Fahmi Zaidi, A. R., & Wan Salihin, W. A. (2013). Assessing the effects ofUTAUT and self-determination predictor on students continuance intention to use studentportal. World Applied Sciences Journal, 21(10), 14841489. http://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2013.21.10.2920Bachman, C., & Scherer, R. (2015). Promoting student autonomy and competence using a hybridmodel for teaching physical activity. International Journal of Instruction, 8(1). Diambil darihttp://www.e-iji.net/dosyalar/iji_2015_1_1.pdfBanas, J. R., & York, C. S. (2014). Authentic learning exercises as a means to influencepreservice teachers technology integration self-efficacy and intentions to integratetechnology. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(6), 728746.http://doi.org/10.4018/ijicte.2014070105Bandura, A. (1971). Social learning theory. Social Learning Theory. New York: GeneralLearning Press.Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory. The American psychologist, 44(9), 11751184.http://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.44.9.1175Banyen, W., Viriyavejakul, C., & Ratanaolarn, T. (2016). A Blended learning model for learningachievement enhancement of Thai undergraduate students. International Journal ofEmerging Technologies in Learning, 11(4), 4855. http://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v11i04.5325Barker, J. (2015). Benefits of hybrid classes in community colleges. Contemporary Issues InEducation Research, 8(3), 143146. Diambil dari http://cluteinstitute.com/ojs/index.php/CIER/article/viewFile/9343/9393Barker, J., & Gossman, P. (2013). The learning impact of a virtual learning environment:Students views. Teacher Education Advancement Network Journal, 5(2), 1938. Diambildari http://194.81.189.19/ojs/index.php/TEAN/article/viewFile/146/261Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in socialpsychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 11731182.Barrio-garca, S., Arquero, J. L., & Romero-fras, E. (2015). Personal learning environmentsacceptance model: The role of need for cognition , e-learning satisfaction and students perceptions. Educational Technology & Society, 18(3), 129141. Diambil darihttp://www.ifets.info/journals/18_3/10.pdfBath, D., & Bourke, J. (2010). Getting started with blended learning. Diambil darihttps://www.griffith.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/267178/Getting_started_with_blended_learning_guide.pdfBelapurkar, A. M. (2013). Blended learning for effective remote learning. Scholarly ResearchJournal for Interdisciplinary Studies, (Special Issue), 19. Diambil dari http://srjis.com/wpcontent/uploads/2016/01/3.2-ANITA-BELAPURKAR.pdfBhattacherjee, A. (2012). Social science research: Principles, methods, and practices (2nd Ed.).USF Tampa Bay Open Access Textbooks Collection: Creative Commons Attribution.Bottge, B. A., Ma, X., Gassaway, L., Toland, M. D., Butler, M., & Cho, S.-J. (2014). Effects ofblended instructional models on math performance. Exceptional Children, 80(4), 423437.http://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914527240Bower, M., Dalgarno, B., Kennedy, G. E., Lee, M. J. W., & Kenney, J. (2015). Design andimplementation factors in blended synchronous learning environments: Outcomes from across-case analysis. Computers & Education, 86, 117. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.006Briggs, K. C. (2014). Blended learning vs face-to-face instruction: A quantitative evaluation ofstudent achievement in Algebra I. (Tesis Kedoktoran, Northcentral University). Diambil darihttps://library.ncu.edu/diss/GetAbstract/4487Brown, T. A., & Moore, M. T. (2012). Confirmatory factor analysis. Dalam R. H. Hoyle (Ed.),HandBook of Structural Equation Modeling (hal. 361376). New York: The Guilford Press.Buabeng-Andoh, C. (2012). Factors influencing teachers adoption and integration of informationand communication technology into teaching: a review of the literature. InternationalJournal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology,8(1), 136155. Diambil dari http://ijedict.dec.uwi.edu//viewarticle.php?id=1361Carman, J. M. (2005). Blended learning design: 5 key ingredients. Instructional Design. Diambildari http://www.agilantlearning.com/instructionaldesign.htmlCassum, S. H., Allana, S., & Dias, J. (2016). Blended Learning across Disciplines: Models forImplementation. Journal of Education and Training Studies (Vol. 4). http://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i1.1168evik, Y. D., Da?han, G., Barin, S., & Savran, R. (2015). Examining information andcommunication technologies preservice teachers views on technology integration and theirroles in this process. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 11(4), 11431166.Diambil dari http://web.a.ebscohost.com.ezpustaka.upsi.edu.my/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=032be052-c7c6-4214-9b27-9054d72c511b@sessionmgr4004&vid=13&hid=4204Chan, W. T. Y., & Leung, C. H. (2016). The use of social media for blended learning in tertiaryeducation. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(4), 771778. http://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040414Chang, C. C., Shu, K. M., Liang, C., Tseng, J. S., & Hsu, Y. S. (2014). Is blended e-learning asmeasured by an achievement test and self-assessment better than traditional classroomlearning for vocational high school students? International Review of Research in Open andDistance Learning, 15(2), 213231. Diambil dari http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1708/2890Cheok, M. L., & Wong, S. L. (2016). Frog virtual learning environment for Malaysian schools:Exploring teachers experience. Dalam J. Zhang, J. Yang, M. Chang, & T. Chang (Ed.), ICTin Education in Global Context, Lecture Notes in Educational Technology (hal. 201209).Singapore: Springer Science+Business Media Singapore. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43927-2Cheung, A. C. K., & Slavin, R. E. (2013). The effectiveness of educational technologyapplications for enhancing mathematics achievement in k-12 classrooms: A meta-analysis.Educational Research Review, 9, 88113. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.001Chew, E. (2008). Book review: Blended learning tools for teaching and training. EducationalTechnology & Society, 11(2), 344347. Diambil dari http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.11.2.344Chew, E., A.Turner, D., & Jones, N. (2010). In love and war: Blended learning theories forcomputer scientists and educationists. Dalam F. L. Wang, J. Fong, & R. C. Kwan (Ed.),Handbook of Research on Hybrid Learning Models: Advanced Tools, Technologies, andApplications (hal. 123). Hershey: Information Science Reference.Chibs-Ortz, F., Borroto-Carmona, G., & De-Almeida-Santos, F. (2014). Managing creativity incollaborative virtual learning environments: A DL corporate project. Media EducationReseacrh Journal, 22, 143151. http://doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.3916/C43-2014-14Chiemeke, S., & Evwiekpaefe, A. (2011). A conceptual framework of a modified unified theoryof acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) model with Nigerian factors in e-commerceadoption. Educational Research, 2(December), 17191726. Diambil darihttp://interesjournal.org/ER/pdf/2011/December/Chiemeke and Evwiekpaefe.pdfChien, T. C. (2012). Computer self-efficacy and factors influencing e-learning effectiveness.European Journal of Training and Development, 36(7), 670686.http://doi.org/10.1108/03090591211255539Chua, Y. P. (2014a). Kaedah penyelidikan (3rd ed.). Kuala Lumpur: McGraw-Hill.Chua, Y. P. (2014b). Ujian regresi, analisis faktor dan analisis SEM (2nd ed.). Kuala Lumpur:McGraw-Hill.Cimermanov, I. (2013). Teacher training in the virtual learning environment. InternationalJournal of Arts and Commerce, 2(10), 18.Cohen, L., Lawrence, M., & Keith, M. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). NewYork: Routledge.Compeau, D., & Higgins, C. (1995). Application of social cognitive theory to training forcomputer skills. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 118143. Diambil darihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.6.2.118Cooke, V. (2014). An evaluation of the use of blended learning strategies to develop and enhancestudents knowledge of primary science. Worcester Journal of Learning and Teaching, (9).Diambil dari http://www.worc.ac.uk/edu/documents/Blended_Learning_Strategies_for_Primary_Science_Cooke.pdfCo?kunay, D. F., & zkan, S. (2013). A model for instructors adoption of learning managementsystems: Empirical validation in higher education context. The Turkish Online Journal ofEducational Technology, 12(2), 1325. Diambil dari http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1015409.pdfCrawford, C., Barker, J., & Seyam, A. (2014). The promising role of hybrid learning incommunity colleges: Looking towards the future. Contemporary Issues In EducationResearch, 7(3), 237243. http://doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.19030/cier.v7i3.8645Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitativeand qualitative research (4th. ed.). Boston: Pearson.Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance ofinformation technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319340. http://doi.org/doi.org/10.2307/249008Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology:A comparison of two theoretical models. Management science, 35(8). http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to usecomputers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), 11111132.http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.xDawson, J. F. (2014). Moderation in management research: What, why, when, and how. Journalof Business and Psychology, 29(1), 119. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-013-9308-7De?man, M. (2015). Modeling the acceptance of e-learning in mandatory environments of highereducation: The influence of previous education and gender. Computers in Human Behavior,49, 272281. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.022Demirer, V., & Sahin, I. (2013). Effect of blended learning environment on transfer of learning:An experimental study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(6), 518529.http://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12009Dillon, W. R., Kumar, A., & Mulani, N. (1987). Offending estimates in covariance structureanalysis: Comments on the causes of and solutions to Heywood cases. PsychologicalBulletin, 101(1), 126135. http://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.101.1.126Downing, C. E., Spears, J., & Holtz, M. (2014). Transforming a course to blended learning forstudent engagement. Education Research International, 2014, 10. http://doi.org/10.1155/2014/430732Driscoll, M. (2002). Blended learning: Lets get beyond the hype. E-learning, 1(4), 14. Diambildari http://www-07.ibm.com/services/pdf/blended_learning.pdfDrysdale, J. S., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. J., & Halverson, L. R. (2013). An analysis of researchtrends in dissertations and theses studying blended learning. Internet and Higher Education,17, 90100. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.11.003Eryilmaz, M. (2015). The effectiveness of blended learning environments. Contemporary IssuesIn Education Research, 8(4), 251256. http://doi.org/10.19030/cier.v8i4.9433Fathema, N., Shannon, D., & Ross, M. (2015). Expanding the technology acceptance model(TAM) to examine faculty use of learning management systems (LMSs) in higher educationinstitutions. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 210232. Diambildari http://www.researchgate.net/publication/281842180Feinberg, F. M. (2012). Mediation analysis and categorical variables: Some further frontiers.Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(4), 595598. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2012.03.007Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th Ed.). London: SAGEPublications Ltd.Fielding, N. G. (2012). Triangulation and mixed methods designs: Data integration with newresearch technologies. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 24(3), 226238.http://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437101Finstad, K. (2010). Response interpolation and scale sensitivity: Evidence against 5-point scales.Journal of Usability Studies, 5(3), 104110. Diambil dari http://uxpajournal.org/wpcontent/uploads/pdf/JUS_Finstad_May_2010.pdfFishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction totheory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Fleiss, J. L. (1971). Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. PsychologicalBulletin, 76(5), 378382. Diambil dari papers://e7d065ae-9998-4287-8af0-c9fa85af8e96/Paper/p44071Foong Mae, C. (2002). ICT in Malaysian schools: Policy and strategies. Education TechnologyDivision, Ministry of Education, Malaysia. Diambil dari http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/apcity/unpan011288.pdfFrancis, R., & Shannon, S. J. (2013). Engaging with blended learning to improve studentslearning outcomes. European Journal of Engineering Education, 38(4), 359369.http://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2013.766679FrogAsia. (2014). Frog Asia; What is the Frog VLE? Diambil dari http://whatisthe.blogspot.ca/2010/04/what-is-accuracy-of-dgps.htmlFuller, C. M., Simmering, M. J., Atinc, G., Atinc, Y., & Babin, B. J. (2016). Common methodsvariance detection in business research. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 31923198.http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.008Garson, G. D. (2012). Testing statistical assumptions. Asheboro, NC USA: Statistical AssociatesPublishing.Garson, G. D. (2015). Structural equation modeling. Asheboro, NC USA: Statistical AssociatesPublishing.Gaskin, J. (2011). Common method bias. Diambil 20 Januari 2017, dari http://youtube.com/GaskinationGaskin, J. (2012). Exploratory factor analysis. Diambil dari http://statwiki.kolobkreations.com/Gaskin, J. (2015). Mediation concepts and bootstrapping in AMOS. Diambil darihttp://youtube.com/GaskinationGaskin, J. (2016a). 2 way interactions. Stats Tools Package. Diambil dari http://statwiki.kolobkreations.comGaskin, J. (2016b). Confirmatory factor analysis. Diambil 3 Januari 2017, dari http://statwiki.kolobkreations.comGaskin, J. (2016c). Data screening. Diambil 3 Januari 2017, dari http://statwiki.kolobkreations.com/Gaskin, J. (2016d). Mediation. Diambil dari http://youtube.com/GaskinationGaskin, J. (2016e). Multi-group analysis. Diambil dari http://youtube.com/GaskinationGaskin, J. (2016f). MyIndirectEffects.AmosEstimandVB. Gaskinations Statistics. Diambil darihttp://statwiki.kolobkreations.comGaskin, J. (2016g). Structural equation modeling. Diambil 25 Januari 2017, dari http://statwiki.kolobkreations.comGaskin, J. (2016h). Validity and reliability. Diambil 21 Januari 2017, dari http://statwiki.kolobkreations.comGaskin, J. (2016i). Validity master. Stats Tools Package. Diambil dari http://statwiki.kolobkreations.comGeer, A., & Da?, F. (2012). A blended learning experience. Educational Sciences: Theory &Practice, 12(1), 438443. Diambil dari http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ978452.pdfGerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1987). Improper solutions in the analysis of covariancestructures: Their interpretability and a comparison of alternate respecifications.Psychometrika, 52(1), 99111. http://doi.org/10.1007/BF02293958Gibbs, C. (2003). Explaining effective teaching: Self-efficacy and thought control of action.Journal of Educational Enquiry, 4(2), 114. Diambil dari http://ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/EDEQ/article/download/520/390G??, A., Nistor, N., & Lerche, T. (2012). Educational technology acceptance across cultures: avalidation of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology in the context of turkishnational culture. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(4), 394408.Diambil dari http://www.tojet.net/articles/v11i4/11440.pdfGraham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions.Dalam C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Ed.), The Handbook of blended learning: GlobalPerspectives, local designs. (hal. A1A88). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing.http://doi.org/10.2307/4022859Graham, C. R. (2013). Emerging practice and research in blended learning. Dalam M. G. Moore(Ed.), Handbook Of Distance Education (3rd. ed., hal. 333350). New York: Routledge.Diambil dari https://www.academia.edu/2068375/Emerging_practice_and_research_in_blended_learningGraham, C. R., & Dziuban, C. (2008). Blended learning environments. Dalam J. David, M. J.Spector, M. Driscoll, M. D. Merrill, J. van Merrienboer, & M. P. Driscoll (Ed.), Handbookof research on educational communications and technology (3, revised ed., hal. 269276).New York: Routledge. http://doi.org/10.1080/02652030701883203Graham, C. R., Henrie, C. R., & Gibbons, A. S. (2014). Developing models and theory forblended learning research. Dalam A. G. Picciano, C. D. Dziuban, & C. R. Graham (Ed.),Blended learning: Research Perspectives (Vol. 2, hal. 1333). New York: Routledge.Diambil dari https://www.academia.edu/3623333/Developing_models_and_theory_for_blended_learning_researchGler, B., & ?ah?n, M. (2015). The effect of blended learning method on preservice elementaryscience teachers attitudes toward technology, self-regulation and science process skills.Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(1), 108127. http://doi.org/10.17522/nefefmed.17511Gzer, B., & Caner, H. (2014). The past, present and future of blended learning: An in depthanalysis of literature. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 45964603.http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.992Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis.Pearson Education Limited (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial leastsquares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, Inc.Hair Jr., J. F., Matthews, L. M., Matthews, R. L., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). PLS-SEM or CB-SEM :updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal Multivariate DataAnalysis, 1(2), 107123. http://doi.org/10.1504/IJMDA.2017.087624Hall, S., & Villareal, D. (2015). The hybrid advantage: Graduate student perspectives of hybrideducation courses. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education,27(1), 6980. Diambil dari http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/Hamzah, M. I., Embi, M. A., & Ismail, A. (2010). ICT and diversity in learners attitude on smartschool initiative. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7(C), 728737.http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.10.099Hauser, R., Paul, R., & Bradley, J. (2012). Computer self-efficacy, anxiety, and learning in onlineversus face to face medium. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 11,141154. Diambil dari http://jite.informingscience.org/documents/Vol11/JITEv11p141-154Hauser0910.pdfHayes, A. (2012). Process: A versatile computational tool for observed variable moderation,mediation, and conditional process modeling. White paper. Diambil darihttp://www.afhayes.com/ public/process2012.pdfHayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis.New York: The Guilford Press.Hayes, A. F., & Preacher, K. J. (2014). Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategoricalindependent variable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67(3),451470. http://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12028Heckman, R., sterlund, C. S., & Saltz, J. (2015). Blended learning at the boundary: Designing anew internship. Online Learning, 19(3), 111128. Diambil dari http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1067509.pdfHenrie, C. R., Bodily, R., Manwaring, K. C., & Graham, C. R. (2015). Exploring intensivelongitudinal measures of student engagement in blended learning. International Review ofResearch in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3), 131155. Diambil darihttp://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/2015/3386Herkersdorf, M. (2014). Virtual blended learning. Global English PEARSON. Diambil darihttp://now.eloqua.com/e/er?s=2111&lid=439&elq=%3Cspanclass=eloquaemail%3Erecipientid%3C/span%3EHew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2014). Using blended learning: Evidence-based practices. NewYork: Springer. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-089-6Hiong, S. N., & Umbit, A. F. (2015). A pilot study on factors affecting the use of frog virtuallearning environment. Jurnal Pendidikan IPG, 12, 117. Diambil darihttp://www.ipbl.edu.my/portal/penyelidikan/jurnalpapers/jurnal2015/Siaw NH_Agatha.pdfHisham, D., Mohd Sobri, D. @ A. W., & Hamzah, A. R. (2012). Action research on blendedlearningtransformative potential in higher education- learners perspectives. Business andManagement Research, 1(2), 125134. http://doi.org/10.5430/bmr.v1n2p125Hofmann, J. (2014). Solutions to the top 10 challenges of blended learning. Boston. Diambil darihttps://www.insynctraining.com/pages/SolutionstotheTop10ChallengesofBlendedLearning.pdfHooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines fordetermining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 5360.Diambil dari http://arrow.dit.ie/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1001&context=buschmanartHoque, K. E., Ahmad Zabidi, A. R., & Fatema Zohora, M. (2012). ICT utilization among schoolteachers and principals in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research inProgressive Education and Development, 1(4), 1734. Diambil darihttps://umexpert.um.edu.my/file/publication/00005891_85801.pdfHuang, R., Ma, D., & Zhang, H. (2008). Towards a design theory of blended learning curriculum.Dalam J. Fong, R. Kwan, & F. L. Wang (Ed.), Hybrid Learning and Education (hal. 6678).Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85170-7Hung, M. (2015). Teacher readiness for online learning: Scale development and teacherperception. Computers & Education, 94, 120133. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.012Hur, W.-M., Kim, H., & Kim, W.-M. (2014). The moderating roles of gender and age in tabletcomputer adoption. Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking, 17(1), 3339.http://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0435Hussein, A. (2009). The use of triangulation in social sciences research: Can qualitative andquantitative methods be combined? Journal of Comparative Social Work, 1, 112. Diambildari http://www.bnemid.byethost14.com/NURSING RESEARCH METHODOLOGY5.pdf?i=1Ibrahim, M., Ahmad Shidki, M. Y., Wan Salihin Wong, A., & Fahmi Zaidi, A. R. (2015). Factorscontributing pre-school trainees teachers adoption of virtual learning environment:Malaysian evidence. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(2), 7379.Diambil dari http://www.tojet.net/articles/v14i2/14210.pdfIsiguzel, B. (2014). The blended learning environment on the foreign language learning process:A balance for motivation and achievement. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 15(3(10)), 108122.Isman, A., Abanmy, F. A. A., Hussein, H. B., Al Sandany, M. A., Barakat, H., Saadany, A., &Abdelrahman, M. (2012). Using blended learning in developing student teachers teachingskills. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(4), 336345.Jackson, S. L. (2015). Research methods and statistics a critical thinking approach. CengageLearning (5th ed.). Boston: Cengage Learning. Diambil darihttps://books.google.com.my/books?id=rTZ-BAAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_atb#v=onepage&q&f=falseJeffrey, L. M., Milne, J., Suddaby, G., & Higgins, A. (2014). Blended learning: How teachersbalance the blend of online and classroom components. Journal of Information TechnologyEducation, 13, 121140. Diambil dari http://www.jite.org/documents/Vol13/JITEv13ResearchP121-140Jeffrey0460.pdfJick, T. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. QualitativeMethodology, 24(4), 602611. http://doi.org/10.2307/2392366Jreskog, K. G. (1999). How large can a standardized coefficient be? Diambil darihttp://www.ssicentral.com/lisrel/techdocs/HowLargeCanaStandardizedCoefficientbe.pdfKabaki Yurdakul, I., Ursava?, . F., & Becit ??itrk, G. (2014). An integrated approach forpreservice teachers acceptance and use of technology: UTAUT-PST scale. EurasianJournal of Educational Research, (55), 2136. http://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2014.55.2Kahn, J. (2014). Reporting Mediation and Moderation. Diambil dari http://my.ilstu.edu/~jhkahn/medmod.htmlKazu, I. Y., & Demirkol, M. (2014). Effect of blended learning environment model on highschool students academic achievement. The Turkish Online Journal of EducationalTechnology, 13(1), 7887.Kementerian Kewangan Malaysia. (2014). Maklum balas ke atas laporan Ketua Audit Negarasiri 3. Putrajaya, Malaysia. Diambil dari https://www.audit.gov.my/images/pdf/LKAN2013/Persekutuan/Siri3/LKAN2013 _ Persekutuan MaklumBalas Siri 3 MASTER.pdfKementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013 -2025. Putrajaya, Malaysia. Diambil dari http://www.moe.gov.my/userfiles/file/PPP/Preliminary-Blueprint-ExecSummary-BM.pdfKementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2016). Kajian antarabangsa pengajaran dan pembelajaran2013. Putrajaya, Malaysia.Khan, A., Fleva, E., & Qazi, T. (2015). Role of self-esteem and general self-efficacy in teachersefficacy in primary schools. Psychology, 6(January), 117125. http://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2015.61010Khechine, H., Lakhal, S., Pascot, D., & Bytha, A. (2014). UTAUT model for blended learning:The role of gender and age in the intention to use webinars. Interdisciplinary Journal of ELearningand Learning Objects, 10, 3352.Khlaisang, J., & Mingsiritham, K. (2016). Engaging virtual learning environment system toenhance communication and collaboration skills among ASEAN higher education learners.Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 11(4), 103113. http://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v11i04.5503Kinzie, M. B., Delcourt, M. a B., & Powers, S. M. (1994). Computer technologies: Attitudes andself efficacy across undergraduate disciplines. Research in Higher Education, 35(6), 745768. Diambil dari http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED357064.pdfKlimova, B. F. (2015). Teaching and learning enhanced by information and communicationtechnologies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186, 898902. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.112Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice Of structural equation modeling (3rd. Ed.). NewYork: The Guilford Press.Kong, S. C., Chan, T.-W., Griffin, P., Hoppe, U., Huang, R., Kinshuk, Yu, S. (2014). Elearningin school education in the coming 10 years for developing 21st century skills:Critical research issues and policy implications. Education Technology & Society, 17(1),7078. Diambil dari http://chan.lst.ncu.edu.tw/publications/2014-E-learning in schooleducation.pdfKorkmaz, O., & Karakus, U. (2009). The impact of blended learning model on student attitudestowards geography course and their critical thinking dispositions and levels. The TurkishOnline Journal of Distance Education, 8(4), 5163. Diambil dari http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ859497.pdfKrejcie, R. V, & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities.Educational And Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607610. http://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308Krosnick, J. A., & Presser, S. (2010). Question and questionnaire design. Handbook of SurveyResearch. Diambil dari http://books.google.com/books?id=mMPDPXpTP-0C&pgis=1Kulviwat, S., Bruner, G. C., & Neelankavil, J. P. (2014). Self-efficacy as an antecedentce ofcognition and affect in technology acceptance. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 31(3), 190199. http://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2Kumutha, R., & Hamidah, Y. (2014). Barriers teachers face in integrating ICT during englishlessons: A case study. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2(3), 1119.Lai, E. R., & Viering, M. (2012). Assessing 21st century skills: Integrating research findings.National Council on Measurement in Education, (April), 66. Diambil darihttp://researchnetwork.pearson.com/wp-content/uploads/Assessing_21st_Century_Skills_NCME.pdfLandis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categoricaldata. Biometrics, 33(1), 159174. http://doi.org/10.2307/2529310Lauri, M. A. (2011). Triangulation of data analysis techniques. Papers of Social Representations,20, 115. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153842Lee, L.-T., & Hung, J. C. (2015). Effects of blended e-learning: A case study in higher educationtax learning setting. Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences, 5(1), 13.http://doi.org/10.1186/s13673-015-0024-3Leila, K., & Tunku Badariah, T. A. (2013). Perceived learning and satisfaction in a blendedteacher education program: An experience of Malaysian teacher trainees. ContemporaryEducational Technology, 4(3), 197211. Diambil dari http://www.cedtech.net/articles/43/434.pdfLihitkar, S. R. (2013). Designing a prototype virtual learning environment for library andinformation science students. Library Hi Tech News, 30(4), 1315.http://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-04-2013-0019Lim, D. H., Morris, M. L., & Kupritz, V. W. (2007). Online vs. Blended Learning: Differences ininstructional outcomes and learner satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous LearningNetworks, 11, 2742. http://doi.org/184.168.109.199Lim, K., & Hwa, M. (2015). A case study of the experiences of instructors and students in aVirtual Learning Environment (VLE) with different cultural backgrounds. Asia PacificEducation Review, 16(4), 613626. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-015-9400-yLin, Q. (2009). Student views of hybrid learning: A one-year exploratory study. Journal ofComputing in Teacher Education, 25(2), 5766.Littlejohn, A., & Pegler, C. (2007). Preparing for blended e-learning. London: Routledge.http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00870_8.xLiu, W., & Yu, H. (2012). Effectiveness study of english learning in blended learningenvironment. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(3), 524530.http://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.3.524-530Lo, M. C., Ramayah, T., & Mohamad, A. A. (2015). Does intention really lead to actual use oftechnology? A study of an e-learning system among university students in Malaysia.Croatian Journal of Education, 17(3), 835863. http://doi.org/10.15516/cje.v17i3.1085Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. NursingResearchResearch, 35(6), 382385. http://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017Machado, L. J., & Chung, C. (2015). Integrating technology: The principals role and effect.International Education Studies, 8(5), 4353. http://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n5p43Maitland, A. (2009). Should I label all scale points or just the end points for attitudinal questions?Survey Practice, 2(4). Diambil dari http://www.surveypractice.org/index.php/SurveyPractice/rt/printerFriendly/172/htmlMaranguni?, N., & Grani?, A. (2015). Technology acceptance model: A literature review from1986 to 2013. Universal Access in the Information Society, 14(1), 8195.http://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1Marcinkowski, B., & Wrycza, S. (2015). CASE tools acceptance in higher education -assessment and enhanced UTAUT model. Dalam 2015 Proceedings of the Conference onInformation Systems Applied Research (hal. 19). Diambil darihttp://proc.conisar.org/2015/pdf/3671.pdfMartin, J. S., Kreiger, J. E., & Apicerno, A. L. (2015). Effectiveness of a hybrid classroom in thedelivery of medical terminology course content relative to a traditional classroom format.Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 15(5), 7281.http://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v15i5.13994Masitah, M. Y., Azizi, M., Ahamad Makmom, A., Bahaman, A. S., Ramli, B., & Noriati, A. R.(2013). Faktor- faktor yang mempengaruhi efikasi kendiri guru sekolah menengah diMalaysia dalam pelaksanaan pendidikan alam sekitar. Asia Pacific Journal of Educatorsand Education, 28, 131153.McCoach, D. B., Gable, R. K., & Madura, J. P. (2013). Instrument development in the affectivedomain: School and corporate applications. Springer Science+Business Media (3rd ed.).New York: Springer Science+Business Media. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7135-6McWilliams, S. A. (2013). A 21st-century personal construct psychology upgrade. Journal ofConstructivist Psychology, 26(3), 164171. http://doi.org/10.1080/10720537.2013.787321Mehta, A. (2014). Technology acceptance of e-learning within a blended vocational course inWest Africa. Dalam Multi Conference On Computer Science And Information Systems 2014(hal. 324328). Diambil dari http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED557293.pdfMenzies, R., Petrie, K., & Zarb, M. (2015). A case study of Facebook use: Outlining a multi-layerstrategy for higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 115.http://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9436-yMirriahi, N., Alonzo, D., McIntyre, S., Kligyte, G., & Fox, B. (2015). Blended learninginnovations: Leadership and change in one Australian institution. International Journal ofEducation and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 11(1), 416. Diambil dari http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1061471.pdfMohamed Amin, E., Norazah, M. N., & Ebrahim, P. (2014). Overview of blended learning.Dalam E. Mohamed Amin (Ed.), Blended & Flipped Learning : Case Studies in MalaysianHEIs (hal. 1). Centre for Teaching & Learning Technologies, Universiti KebangsaanMalaysia & Department of Higher Education, Ministry of Education Malaysia. Diambil darihttp://www.moe.gov.my/cms/upload_files/publicationfile/2015/pubfile_file_002071.pdfMohammed Jaber, S. A., Rosnaini, M., Kamariah, A. B., & Ahmad Fauzi, M. A. (2012). Factorsinfluencing the use of learning management system in Saudi Arabian higher education: Atheoretical framework. Higher Education Studies, 2(2), 125137.http://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v2n2p125Mohd Awang, I., & Dollard, M. F. (2011). Psychosocial safety climate, work conditions, andemotions in the workplace: A Malaysian population-based work stress study. InternationalJournal of Stress Management, 18(4), 324347. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0024849Mohd Nazri, A. R. (2014). Pembangunan model homeschooling berasaskan nilai dan amalanmasyarakat bagi kanak-kanak orang asli. (Tesis Kedoktoran, Universiti Malaya). Diambildari http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/4716/Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions ofadopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 192222. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.2.3.192Muhamad Azhar, S., Mohamad, I., & Amri, Y. (2015). Engaging vocational college studentsthrough blended learning: Improving class attendance and participation. Procedia - Socialand Behavioral Sciences, 204(November 2014), 127135. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.125Muraina, I. D. (2015). The factors that contribute to the continuous usage of broadbandtechnologies among youth in rural areas: A case of northern region of Malaysia. (TesisKedoktoran). Universiti Utara Malaysia, Kedah, Malaysia.Nachtigall, C., Kroehne, U., Funke, F., & Steyer, R. (2003). (Why) Should we use SEM? Prosand cons of structural equation modeling. Methods of Psychological Research, 8(2), 122.Diambil dari http://www.dgps.de/fachgruppen/methoden/mpr-online/issue20/art1/mpr127_11.pdfNewby, P. (2014). Research methods for education (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Newsom, J. (2017). Improper solutions in SEM. Diambil dari http://web.pdx.edu/~newsomj/semclass/ho_improper.pdfNguyen, T. N. (2015). Motivational effect of web-based simulation game in teaching operationsmanagement. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 3(2), 915.http://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v3i2.565Nor Fadzleen, S., Halina, M. D., & Haliza, Z. (2013). Derivation for design of Virtual LearningEnvironment (VLE) framework for Malaysian schools. Dalam 3rd International Conferenceon Research and Innovation in Information Systems, ICRIIS. http://doi.org/10.1109/ICRIIS.2013.6716772Norazilawati, A., Noraini, M. N., Nik Azmah, N. Y., & Rosnidar, M. (2013). Aplikasipersekitaran pengajaran maya (Frog VLE) dalam kalangan guru sains. Jurnal PendidikanSains dan Matematik, 3(2), 6376.Nuanmeesri, S. (2014). A design of the infrastructure and computer network for distanceeducation, online learning via new media, e-learning and blended learning. InternationalJournal of Computer, Electrical, Automation, Control and Information Engineering, 8(9),15791582.Nulty, D. D. (2008). The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: What can bedone? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(3), 301314.http://doi.org/10.1080/02602930701293231Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Nurain, R., Balakrishnan, M., & Wan Ahmad Jaafar, W. Y. (2015). Attitude and motivation ofMalaysian secondary school students learning of ESL in a blended learning environment.Dalam e-Proceeding of the Global Conference on Technology in Language Learning 2015.http://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4966.6646Nur Syamimi, M. R., & Noraffandy, Y. (2010). Blended learning: Overcome the weaknesses ofe-learning and traditional approach. Edupress 2010. Diambil dari http://eprints.utm.my/14929/Nurul Farhana, J. (2013). Cabaran dalam mengimplementasi Virtual Learning Environment(VLE) Frog dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran oleh guru di sekolah-sekolah di Malaysia.(Tesis Sarjana). Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor, Malaysia.OLeary, R. (2002). Virtual learning environments. LTSN Economics and Manager of theLearning Technology Support Service, University of Bristol. Diambil darihttp://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00190701/Obiedat, R., Eddeen, L. N., Harfoushi, O., Koury, A., & Alassaf, N. (2014). Effect of blendedlearningon academic achievement of students in the University of Jordan. InternationalJournal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 9(2), 3745. http://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v9i2.3220Ofsted. (2009). Virtual learning environments: An evaluation of their development in a sample ofeducational settings. Alexandra House. The Office for Standards in Education. Diambil dariwww.ofsted.gov.ukOke, A. E., Ogunsami, D. R., & Ogunlana, S. (2012). Establishing a common ground for the useof structural equation modelling for construction related research studies. AustralasianJournal of Construction Economics and Building, 12(3), 8994. http://doi.org/10.5130/ajceb.v12i3.2658Oliver, M., & Trigwell, K. (2005). Can Blended Learning be redeemed? E-Learning, 2(1), 1726. http://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2005.2.1.17Osborne, J. W. (2015). What is rotating in exploratory factor analysis? Practical Assessment,Research & Evaluation, 20(2), 17. http://doi.org/10.1037/e558952014-001Padilla-Melendez, A., Del Aguila-Obra, A. R., & Garrido-Moreno, A. (2013). Perceivedplayfulness, gender differences and technology acceptance model in a blended learningscenario. Computers and Education, 63, 306317. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.014Perez-Marin, D., & Pascual-Nieto, I. (2012). A case study on the use of blended learning toencourage computer science students to study. Journal of Science Education Technology,21, 7482. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9283-6Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common methodbiases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879903. http://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in socialscience research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology,63(1), 539569. http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Owen, S. V. (2007). Is the cvi an acceptable indicator of contentvalidity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health (Vol. 30).Poon, J. (2012). Use of blended learning to enhance the student learning experience andengagement in property education. Property Management, 30(2), 129156. http://doi.org/10.1108/02637471211213398Preacher, K. J., & Kelley, K. (2011). Effect size measures for mediation models: Quantitativestrategies for communicating indirect effects. Psychological Methods, 16(2), 93115.http://doi.org/10.1037/a0022658Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations. Newyork Free Press (3rd Editio). New York: TheFree Press. http://doi.org/citeulike-article-id:126680Rouhollah, K., Habibah, A. J., Wan Zah, W. A., & Shaffe, M. D. (2015). Presence and perceivedlearning in different higher education blended learning environments. International Journalof Mobile and Blended Learning, 7(3), 5970. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJMBL.2015070104?ad, S. N. (2012). An attitude scale for smart board use in education: Validity and reliabilitystudies. Computers and Education, 58(3), 900907. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.017Saiful Afzan, B., Lazim, A., Ali, A., & Yusoff, H. (2014). Pemodelan penerimaan pelajarterhadap persekitaran pembelajaran maya (VLE). Journal of Business and SocialDevelopment, 2(2), 3647.Saltson, E., & Sharon, N. (2015). The mediating and moderating effects of motivation in therelationship between perceived organizational support and employee job performance.International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 3(7), 654667. Diambildari http://ijecm.co.uk/Sam, H. K., Othman, A. E. A., & Nordin, Z. S. (2005). Computer self-efficacy, computer anxiety,and attitudes toward the Internet: A study among undergraduates in Unimas. EducationalTechnology and Society, 8(4), 205219. http://doi.org/10.2307/jeductechsoci.8.4.205Sankaran, S., & Norazlinda, S. (2017). Adoption of technology: school location as moderator.The Social Sciences, 12(7), 12701274. Diambil dari http://docsdrive.com/pdfs/medwelljournals/sscience/2017/1270-1274.pdfSaunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2012). Research methods for business students (6thed.). Harlow, England: Pearson.Sauro, J. (2010). Should you use 5 or 7 point scales? Diambil dari http://www.measuringusability.com/blog/scale-points.phpSchumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2010). A beginners guide to structural equation modeling(3rd Ed.). New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2009). Research methods for business (5th. ed.). West Sussex, UK:John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Selig, J. P., & Preacher, K. J. (2009). Mediation models for longitudinal data in developmentalresearch. Research in Human Development, 6(23), 144164. http://doi.org/10.1080/15427600902911247Seri Rahayu, H. (2011). Teachers beliefs and use of ICTs in malaysian smart schools: A casestudy. Dalam Changing Demands, Changing Directions. Proceedings ascilite Hobart 2011(hal. 522525). Diambil dari http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/hobart11/downloads/papers/Hamid-poster.pdfShamsuddin, H. (n.d.). Integrating ICT in teaching and learning: Countrty report: Malaysia.Diambil dari http://woulibrary.wou.edu.my/weko/eed502/Shamsuddin_-_ICT_in_Malaysia_Education.pdfSharpe, R., Benfield, G., Roberts, G., & Richard Francis. (2006). The undergraduate experienceof blended e-learning: A review of UK literature and practice. London: Higher EducationAcademy. Diambil dari https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/sites/default/files/sharpe_benfield_roberts_francis_0.pdfShi, J., Mo, X., & Sun, Z. (2012). Content validity index in scale development. Journal ofCentral South University (Medical Sciences), 37(2), 152155. http://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-7347.2012.02.007Shin, W. S., & Kang, M. (2015). The use of a mobile learning management system at an onlineuniversity and its effect on learning satisfaction and achievement. International Review ofResearch in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3), 110130.Shivam, R., & Singh, S. (2015). Implementation of blended learning in classroom: A reviewpaper. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 5(11), 369372.Siang, J. J., & Santoso, H. B. (2015). Students perspective of learning management system: Anempirical evidence of technology acceptance model in emerging countries. Journal of Arts,Science & Commerce, 6(2), 114.Siew-Eng, L., & Muuk, M. A. (2015). Blended learning in teaching secondary schools english:A preparation for tertiary science education in Malaysia. Procedia - Social and BehavioralSciences, 167(October), 293300. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.677Simelane, S., & Mji, A. (2014). Impact of technology-engagement teaching strategy with the aidof clickers on students learning style. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 136,511521. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.367Simeonova, B., Bogolyubov, P., Blagov, E., & Kharabsheh, R. (2014). Cross-cultural validationof UTAUT: The case of university VLEs in Jordan, Russia and the UK. The ElectronicJournal of Knowledge Management, 12(1), 2534. Diambil darihttp://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/69681Singh, H. (2003). Building effective blended learning programs. Educational Technology, 43(6),5154. http://doi.org/10.1021/es2033229Singh, H., & Reed, C. (2001). A white paper: Achieving success with blended learning. ASTDState of the Industry Report, American Society for Training & Development (CENTRA),(March), 111. Diambil dari http://facilitateadultlearning.pbworks.com/f/blendedlearning.pdfSiti Nazuar, S. (2014). Barriers influencing teacher s technology integration in their teachingpractice. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 8(23), 352357.Smith, J., Groves, M., Bowd, B., & Barber, A. (2012). Facilitating the development of studyskills through a blended learning approach. International Journal of Higher Education, 1(2),108117. http://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v1n2p108Songkram, N. (2015). E-learning system in virtual learning environment to develop creativethinking for learners in higher education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174,674679. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.600Stein, J., & Graham, C. R. (2014). Essentials for blended learning: A standards-based guide.New York: Routledge.Stratton, T. M. (2014). A case study of the integration of 21st century technology within theplace-based, expeditionary learning outward bound (ELOB) approach to education.Instructional Technology Education Specialist Research Papers, (16), 159.http://doi.org/http://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/edu-papers/16 ThisSwanson, R. A. (2007). Theory framework for applied disciplines: boundaries, contributing, core,useful, novel, and irrelevant components. Human Resource Development Review, 6(3), 321339. http://doi.org/10.1177/1534484307303770Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: PearsonEducation. Inc.Tan, P. J. B. (2013). Applying the UTAUT to understand factors affecting the use of english elearningwebsites in Taiwan. SAGE Open, 3(4), 112. http://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013503837Tarhini, A., Hone, K., & Liu, X. (2014). Measuring the moderating effect of gender and age on elearningacceptance in England: A structural equation modeling approach for an extendedtechnology acceptance model. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 51(2), 163184. http://doi.org/10.2190/EC.51.2.bTay, H. Y. (2016). Investigating engagement in a blended learning course. Cogent Education,3(1), 13. http://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2015.1135772Tayebinik, M., & Puteh, M. (2012). Blended learning or e-learning? International Magazine onAdvances in Computer Science and Telecommunications, 3(1), 103110.http://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.001Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test ofcompeting models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144176.http://doi.org/10.1287/isre.6.2.144Teo, T., Fan, X., & Du, J. (2015). Technology acceptance among pre-service teachers: Doesgender matter ? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(3), 235251.http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.14742/ajet.v0i0.1672Teo, T., Khlaisang, J., Thammetar, T., Ruangrit, N., Satiman, A., & Sunphakitjumnong, K.(2014). A survey of pre-service teachers acceptance of technology in Thailand. Asia PacificEducation Review, 15(4), 609616. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-014-9348-3Teo, T., Luan, W. S. L., & Sing, C. C. (2008). A cross-cultural examination of the intention to usetechnology between Singaporean And Malaysian pre-service teachers: An application of thetechnology acceptance model (TAM). Journal of Educational Technology and Society,11(4), 265280. Diambil dari http://www.ifets.info/download_pdf.php?j_id=41&a_id=903Teo, T., & Zhou, M. (2016). The influence of teachers conceptions of teaching and learning ontheir technology acceptance. Interactive Learning Environments, 4820(March), 115.http://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1143844Termit, K., & Noorma, H. (2015). Teachers readiness to utilize Frog VLE: A case study of aMalaysian secondary school. British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioural Science5(1), 2029. http://doi.org/10.9734/BJESBS/2015/11965The JISC infoNet Service. (2006). Effective use of VLEs: Introduction to VLEs. Diambil darihttp://www.jiscinfonet.ac.uk/InfoKits/effective-use-of-VLEs/intro-to-VLEs/printable_version.pdfThe Oxford Group. (2013). Blended learning - current use, challenges and best practices.Diambil dari http://www.kineo.com/elearning-reports/blended-learning-current-usechallenges-and-best-practice.htmlThomas, T., Singh, L., & Gaffar, K. (2013). The utility of the UTAUT model in explainingmobile learning adoption in higher education in Guyana. International Journal of Educationand Development using Information and Communication Technology, 9(3), 7185. Diambildari http://ijedict.dec.uwi.edu/viewarticle.php?id=1687Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding conceptsand applications. Washington: American Psychological Association.http://doi.org/10.1037/10694-000 Thompson,Thompson, R. L., Higgins, C. A., & Howell, J. . (1991). Personal computing: Toward aconceptual model of utilization. MIS Quarterly, 15(1), 124143.http://doi.org/10.2307/249443Torrisi-steele, G. (2011). This thing called blended learning - a definition and planning approach.Research and Development in Higher Education: Higher Education on the Edge, 34, 360371. Diambil dari http://www98.griffith.edu.au/dspace/bitstream/handle/10072/42960/70212_1.pdf?sequence=1Touray, A., & Salminen, A. (2013). The impact of moderating factors on behavioral intentiontowards internet: A transnational perspective. International Journal of Computer andInformation Technology, 2(6), 10351041. Diambil dari www.ijcit.comTsai, C. W. (2015). Investigating the effects of web-mediated design thinking and co-regulatedlearning on developing students computing skills in a blended course. Universal Access inthe Information Society, 14(2), 295305. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-015-0401-8Turisiana, A. B., & Fauziah Saadah, A. H. (2014). Lecturers perceptions of blended learningreadiness. Journal of Practices in Language Learning and Teaching, 2(2), 5063. Diambildari http://www.kedah.uitm.edu.my/CPLT/images/stories/v2n2/Article4.pdfUSCLibraries. (2016). Organizing your social sciences research paper: Theoretical framework.Diambil dari http://libguides.usc.edu/writingguideUysal, R., Satici, S. A., Satici, B., & Akin, A. (2014). Subjective vitality as mediator andmoderator of the relationship between life satisfaction and subjective happiness.Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14(2), 489497. http://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2014.2.1828VanDerLinden, K. (2014). Blended learning as transformational institutional learning. DalamNew Directions for Higher Education (hal. 7585). http://doi.org/10.1002/heVatanartiran, S., & Karadeniz, S. (2015). A needs analysis for technology integration plan:Challenges and needs of teachers. Contemporary Educational Technology, 6(3), 206220.Diambil dari http://web.a.ebscohost.com.ezpustaka.upsi.edu.my/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=02839cfb-7b1d-47cb-871a-361f9d93bc8f@sessionmgr4002&vid=1&hid=4204Vatuiu, T., & Udric?, M. (2013). Virtual learning environment as part of lifelong learning.Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 14(4), 252259. Diambil darihttp://dergipark.ulakbim.gov.tr/tojde/article/view/5000102268Vaughan, N. (2014). Student engagement and blended learning: Making the assessmentconnection. Education Sciences, 4(4), 247264. http://doi.org/10.3390/educsci4040247Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsicmotivation, acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342365. Diambil darihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1287/Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptancemodel: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186204.http://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926Venkatesh, V., & Morris, G. M. (2000). Why dont men ever stop to ask for direction? Gender,social influence and their role in technology acceptance and usage behaviour. MISQuarterly, 24(1), 115139. http://doi.org/10.2307/3250981Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., & Ackerman, P. (2000). A longitudinal field investigation of genderdifferences in individual technology adoption decision-making processes. Organizationalbehavior and human decision processes, 83(1), 3360. http://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2896Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance ofinformation technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425478.http://doi.org/10.2307/30036540Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of informationtechnology: Extending the unified theory. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157178. Diambil darihttp://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2002388Virginia, W. (2014). Research methods: Triangulation. Evidence Based Library and InformationPractice, 9(1), 7475. http://doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.18438/B8WW3XWai, C. C., & Seng, E. L. K. (2014). Exploring the effectiveness and efficiency of blendedlearning tools in a school of business. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,123(2002), 470476. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1446Wan Fariza Alyati, W. Z. (2012). Alvin Toffler: Knowledge, technology and change in futuresociety. International Journal of Islamic Thought, 1(June), 5461. Diambil darihttp://www.ukm.my/ijit/IJIT Vol 1 2012/7wan fariza.pdfWan Zah, W. A., Hajar, M. N., Azimi, H., & Hayati, A. (2009). The conditions and level of ICTintegration in Malaysian Smart Schools. International Journal of Education andDevelopment using ICT, 5(2), 2131. Diambil dari http://ijedict.dec.uwi.edu//viewarticle.php?id=618&layout=htmlWang, Y., Han, X., & Yang, J. (2015). Revisiting the blended learning literature: Using aComplex Adaptive Systems Framework. Educational Technology & Society, 18(2), 380393. Diambil dari http://www.ifets.info/journals/18_2/28.pdfWayne, J. (2012). Effective learning - blended learning and virtual learning environment. Diambildari http://www.selfgrowth.com/articles/effective-learning-blended-learning-and-virtuallearning-environmentWei, W. (2009). A technology acceptance model: Mediate and moderate effect. Asia PacificManagement Review, 14(4), 461476. Diambil dari http://apmr.management.ncku.edu.tw/comm/updown/DW0911102983.pdfWong, G. K. W. (2014). Understanding technology acceptance in pre-service teachers of primarymathematics: A pilot study in Hong Kong. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology,31(6), 713735. Diambil dari http://ajet.org.au/index.php/AJET/article/viewFile/1890/1326Wong, K. T., Rosma, O., Goh, P. S. C., & Mohd Khairezan, R. (2013). Understanding studentteachers behavioural intention to use technology: Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)validation and testing. International Journal of Instruction, 6(1), 89105. Diambil darihttp://www.e-iji.net/dosyalar/iji_2013_1_6.pdfWong, K. T., Teo, T., & Goh, P. S. C. (2014). Development of the interactive whiteboardacceptance scale (IWBAS): an Anitial study. Educational Technology and Society, 17(4),268277. Diambil dari http://www.ifets.info/journals/17_4/18.pdfWong, L., Tatnall, A., & Burgess, S. (2014). A framework for investigating blended learningeffectiveness. Education + Training, 56(2), 233251. http://doi.org/10.1108/ET-04-2013-0049Wu, Y., Wen, M., Chen, C., & Hsu, I. (2016). An integrated BIM and cost estimating blendedlearning model acceptance differences between experts and novice. Eurasia Journal ofMathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(5), 13471363. http://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1517aXin, H., Kempland, M., & Blankson, F. H. (2015). Adaptability and replicability of webfacilitated,hybrid, and online learning in an undergraduate exercise psychology course.Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(1), 1930. Diambil darihttp://www.tojet.net/articles/v14i1/1413.pdfYaghmale, F. (2003). Content validity and its estimation. Journal of Medical Education, 3(1),2527. Diambil dari http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/jme/article/download/870/769.Yapici, ?. ., & Akbayin, H. (2012). The effect of blended learning model on high schoolstudents biology achievement and on their attitudes towards the internet. The TurkishOnline Journal of Educational Technology, 11(2), 228237. Diambil darihttp://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ989031.pdfYeasmin, S., & Rahman, K. F. (2012). Triangulation research method as the tool of socialscience research. Bup Journal, 1(1), 154163. Diambil dari http://www.bup.edu.bd/journal/154-163.pdfYeou, M. (2016). An investigation of students acceptance of moodle in a blended learning settingusing technology acceptance model. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 44(3),300318. http://doi.org/10.1177/0047239515618464Yu, Z., & Yuexiu, Z. (2015). Blended learning over two decades. International Journal ofInformation and Communication Technology Education, 11(3), 119. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJICTE.2015070101Zaharah, H., Saedah, S., Ghazali, D., & Nur Hasbuna, M. S. (2015). Kajian model blendedlearning dalam jurnal terpilih: Satu analisa kandungan. Jurnal Kurikulum & PengajaranAsia Pasifik, 3(1), 2031. Diambil dari juku.um.edu.myZainudin, A. (2015). SEM Made Simple: A gentle approach to learning structural equationmodeling. Bangi: MPWS Rich Publication.Zainudin, A., Asyraf, A., & Mustafa, M. (2016). The Likert scale analysis using parametric basedStructural Equation Modeling (SEM). Computational Methods in Social Sciences, 4(1), 1321. Diambil dari http://cmss.univnt.ro/wp-content/uploads/vol/split/vol_IV_issue_1/CMSS_vol_IV_issue_1_art.002.pdfZhang, M., Liu, Y., Yan, W., & Zhang, Y. (2016). Users continuance intention of virtuallearning community services: The moderating role of usage experience. InteractiveLearning Environments, 119. http://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1172242Zuraidah, Z. (2014). The effects of customer-brand relationship investments on customerengagement. (Tesis Kedoktoran). Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia.Zuraidah, Z., Norjaya, M. Y., Nor Asiah, O., & Nik M. Hazrul, N. H. (2014). Determining thekey factors of customerbrand relationship investment dimensions: Insights from Malaysianmobile phone users. Journal of Relationship Marketing, 13(4), 318342.http://doi.org/10.1080/15332667.2014.965649

Similar Items