Model konseptual penjajaran antara sistem maklumat dengan organisasi di institusi berteraskan pendidikan

Model konseptual penjajaran antara sistem maklumat dengan organisasi di institusi berteraskan pendidikan

Kajian ini menentukan hubungan antara ciri sistem maklumat dan ciri organisasidengan kejayaan sistem maklumat (KS), serta membentuk Model Konseptual Penjajaran antara Sistem Maklumat dengan Organisasi di Institusi Berteraskan Pendidikan (IS-OrgFit Model). Kajian ini menggunakan gabungan pendekatan...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Razana Baharudin
Format: thesis
Language:zsm
Published: 2018
Subjects:
T Technology
Online Access:https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5323
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:5323
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
collection UPSI Digital Repository
language zsm
topic T Technology
spellingShingle T Technology
Razana Baharudin
Model konseptual penjajaran antara sistem maklumat dengan organisasi di institusi berteraskan pendidikan
description Kajian ini menentukan hubungan antara ciri sistem maklumat dan ciri organisasidengan kejayaan sistem maklumat (KS), serta membentuk Model Konseptual Penjajaran antara Sistem Maklumat dengan Organisasi di Institusi Berteraskan Pendidikan (IS-OrgFit Model). Kajian ini menggunakan gabungan pendekatan kualitatif dan kuantitatif.Pendekatan kualitatif dengan kaedah temu bual digunakan untuk mendapat gambaran awal tentang pelaksanaan sistem maklumat yang melibatkan 15 orang pegawai perkhidmatan pendidikan di Perak. Pendekatan kuantitatif digunakan untuk membentuk dan menilaiIS-Org Fit Model. Bagi pembentukan model, borang soal selidik diedarkan kepada 375 orangguru di 10 buah sekolah menengah di daerah Hulu Perak, Kuala Kangsar, Muallim, dan Kinta.Sekolah-sekolah dipilih secara rawak kelompok. Bagi menilai model, enam orang pakar dalambidang sistem maklumat telah dikenal pasti. Data daripada borang soal selidik dianalisis denganmenggunakan statistik deskriptif dan inferens. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan P&T-TF(penjajaran antara ciri individu, ciri teknologi, ciri tugas yang dilakukan oleh individu, dan ciritugas yang dibekalkan oleh teknologi), ?= 0.25, =.00 dan ISS-OMSF (penjajaran antarastrategi sistem maklumat dan strategi pengurusan organisasi), ?=0.59, =.00, merupakan peramal kepada KS, F(2,372)=309.37, =.00 dan signifikan pada
format thesis
qualification_name
qualification_level Doctorate
author Razana Baharudin
author_facet Razana Baharudin
author_sort Razana Baharudin
title Model konseptual penjajaran antara sistem maklumat dengan organisasi di institusi berteraskan pendidikan
title_short Model konseptual penjajaran antara sistem maklumat dengan organisasi di institusi berteraskan pendidikan
title_full Model konseptual penjajaran antara sistem maklumat dengan organisasi di institusi berteraskan pendidikan
title_fullStr Model konseptual penjajaran antara sistem maklumat dengan organisasi di institusi berteraskan pendidikan
title_full_unstemmed Model konseptual penjajaran antara sistem maklumat dengan organisasi di institusi berteraskan pendidikan
title_sort model konseptual penjajaran antara sistem maklumat dengan organisasi di institusi berteraskan pendidikan
granting_institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
granting_department Fakulti Seni, Komputeran dan Industri Kreatif
publishDate 2018
url https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5323
_version_ 1747833182827315200
spelling oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:53232020-10-23 Model konseptual penjajaran antara sistem maklumat dengan organisasi di institusi berteraskan pendidikan 2018 Razana Baharudin T Technology Kajian ini menentukan hubungan antara ciri sistem maklumat dan ciri organisasidengan kejayaan sistem maklumat (KS), serta membentuk Model Konseptual Penjajaran antara Sistem Maklumat dengan Organisasi di Institusi Berteraskan Pendidikan (IS-OrgFit Model). Kajian ini menggunakan gabungan pendekatan kualitatif dan kuantitatif.Pendekatan kualitatif dengan kaedah temu bual digunakan untuk mendapat gambaran awal tentang pelaksanaan sistem maklumat yang melibatkan 15 orang pegawai perkhidmatan pendidikan di Perak. Pendekatan kuantitatif digunakan untuk membentuk dan menilaiIS-Org Fit Model. Bagi pembentukan model, borang soal selidik diedarkan kepada 375 orangguru di 10 buah sekolah menengah di daerah Hulu Perak, Kuala Kangsar, Muallim, dan Kinta.Sekolah-sekolah dipilih secara rawak kelompok. Bagi menilai model, enam orang pakar dalambidang sistem maklumat telah dikenal pasti. Data daripada borang soal selidik dianalisis denganmenggunakan statistik deskriptif dan inferens. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan P&T-TF(penjajaran antara ciri individu, ciri teknologi, ciri tugas yang dilakukan oleh individu, dan ciritugas yang dibekalkan oleh teknologi), ?= 0.25, =.00 dan ISS-OMSF (penjajaran antarastrategi sistem maklumat dan strategi pengurusan organisasi), ?=0.59, =.00, merupakan peramal kepada KS, F(2,372)=309.37, =.00 dan signifikan pada 2018 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5323 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5323 text zsm closedAccess Doctoral Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Seni, Komputeran dan Industri Kreatif Al-adaileh, R. M. (2009). An evaluation of information systems success: A userperspective-the case of Telecom Group. European Jordan Journal of Scientific Research, 37(2), 226-239. Diperoleh daripadahttp://www.eurojournals.com/ejsr.htmAlharbi, S. (2014). Using the TAM in understanding academics? behavioural intention touse Learning Management Systems. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science andApplications, 143-155.Alhomod, S., & Shafi, M. (2013). E-governance in education: Areas of impact and proposing aframework to measure the impact. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 14(2),305-313.Ali Balaid, Mohd. Zaidi Rozan, & Syed Norris Abdullah. (2014). Conseptual Model forExamining Knowledge Maps Adoption in Software Development Organizations. Asian Social Science, 10(15), 118-132.http://dx.doi.org/10.5539 /ass.v10n15p118Alkhalifah, A., & D?Ambra, J. (2011). Applying task-technology fit to the adoption ofIdentity Management Systems. Dalam prosiding ACIS 2011 Proceedings. Paper 31. Diperolehdaripada http://aisel.aisnet.org/acis2011/31Althonayan, M., & Papazafeiropoulou, A. (2011). Evaluating the Performance of ERP Systems in Saudi Arabian Higher Education: A Stakeholders' Perspective. European Conference on Information Management and Evaluation, 473-482. Diperoleh daripadahttp://search.proquest.com.ezpustaka.upsi.edu.my/science/docview/1380629738/1256EEEB9A08448APQ/14?accountid=13155American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication Manual of American Psychological Association. 6??. Ed. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Ankrah, E., & Sokro, E. (2016). Intention and usage of Human ResourceInformation Systems among Ghanaian Human Resource Managers. International Journal of Business and Management; 11(2), 241-248..doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v11n2p241Bagos, P.G., & Adam, M. (2015). On the Covariance of Regression Coefficients. Open Journal of Statistics, 5, 680-701. Diperoleh daripadahttp://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojs.2015.57069Barki, H., & Hartwick, J. (1994). Measuring user participation, user involvementand user attitude. MIS Quarterly, 18, 59-79.Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173 1182.Bayzidnejad, M., Kafche, P., & Shafeai, R. (2012). Alignment of IT with business strategy in thebanking industry of Iran. Inter Disciplinary Journal Of Contemporary Research In Business,4(2), 391-410.Beest, M. V. (2016). What is strategic alignment? Diperoleh daripadahttp://www.ehow.com/about_6382585_strategic-alignment_.htmlBest, J. W., & Kahn, J. V. (1998). Research in Education. 8??. Ed, Singapore: PrenticeHall.Bryman, A. (2001). Social research methods. Oxford University Press.Buchwald, A. Urbach, N., & Ahlemann, F. (2014). Business value through controlled IT:toward an integrated model of IT governance success and its impact. Journal of Information Technology, 29, 128147. doi:10.1057/jit.2014.3Budic, Z. D. (1994). Effectiveness of Geographic Information Systems in local planning.Journal of the American Planning Association, 60(2), 244-264.Burton-Jones, A., & Gallivan, M. J. (2007). Toward a Deeper Understanding of SystemUsage in Organizations: A Multilevel Perspective. MIS Quarterly, 31(4), 657-679.Chen, D. Q., Mocker, M., Preston, D. S., & Teubner, A. (2010). Information systemsstrategy: Reconceptualization, measurement, and implications. MIS Quarterly, 34(2), 233-259.Chi-Hung Yeh, Gwo-Guang Lee & Jung-Chi Pai. (2012). How information system capability affects e-business information technology strategy implementation?: An empirical study in Taiwan. Business Process Management Journal, 18(2), 197218.doi:10.1108/14637151211225171Chong, B., C., Skibniewski, M. J., & Kwak, Y. H. (2009). Developing ERP Systems Success Model for the Construction Industry. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 207-216.doi:10.1061/(ASCA)1733.9364(2009) 135.3(207)Chong, P. K. C. (1993). Organizational impacts of information systems: A pre-development assessment. Asian Journal of Information Systems, 6, 109-122.Chua Yan Piaw. (2009). Statistik penyelidikan lanjutan: Ujian regresi, analisisfaktor dan analisis SEM. (Buku 5), Malaysia: McGraw-Hill.Chung-Kai Li, & Chia-Hung Hung. (2010). An examination of the mediating roleof person-job fit in relations between information literacy and work outcomes.Journal of Workplace Learning, 22 (5), 306318.Daft, R. L. (1992). Organization theory and design. USA: West.D'Ambra, J., & Rice, R. E. (2001). Emerging factors in user evaluation of the World Wide Web. Information & Management, 38(6), 373.doi:10.1016/S0378-7206(00)00077-XD'Ambra, J., & Wilson, C. S. (2004). Explaining perceived performance of the World WideWeb: uncertainty and The Task-Technology Fit Model. Internet Research, 14(4), 294-310. doi:10.1108/10662240410555315Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance ofinformation technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.DeHaes, S., & Grembergen, V.W. (2010). Analysing the impact of enterprise governance ofIT practices on business performance. International Journal on IT/Business Alignment andGovernance, 1(1), 14-38.DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information system success: The quest for the dependentvariable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60-95.DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean Model of InformationSystem Success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9-30.Denscombe, M. (2004). The good research guide for small-scale social research. (2nd edition). OpenUniversity Press.Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. (2016). Istilah dewan. (Edisi 4). Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Diperolehdaripada http://prpm.dbp.gov.my.Dimitrios, M., Dimitrios, C., & Charalampos, T. (2011). Factors affecting ERP systemimplementation effectiveness. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 25 (1), 160 168.doi:10.1108/17410391211192161Dishaw, M. T., & Strong, D. M. (1999). Extending the Technology Acceptance Model withTask-Technology Fit Constructs. Information & Management, 36(1), 9-21.Doherty, N. F., Ashurst, C., & Peppard, J. (2011). Factors affecting the successful realization ofbenefits from system development projects: Findings from three case studies. Journal ofInformation Technology, 1-16.Dudovskiy, J. (2016, Mei 29). Research methodology: Multi-stage sampling. Diperoleh daripada http://research-methodology.net/sampling/multi-stage-sampling/Dudovskiy, J., (2016, Februari 23). Research methodology: Reliability andvalidity. Diperoleh daripada http://research-methodology.net/research-methodology/reliability-validity-and-repeatability/Eldrandaly, K. A., Naguib, S. M., & Hassan, M. M. (2015). A Model for MeasuringGeographic Information Systems Success. Journal of Geographic Information System, 7(4), 328-347.doi:10.4236/jgis.2015.74026Fah, L.Y., & Hoon, K.C. (2012). Pengenalan kepada pendekatan kuantitatif dalam penyelidikanpendidikan. Sabah: Penerbit Universiti Malaysia Sabah.Fairchild, A. J., & McQuillin, S. D. (2010). Evaluating mediation and moderation effect in schoolpsychology: A presentation of methods and review of current practice. Journal of School Psychology, 48(1), 53-84. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2009.09.001Ferreira, A. A., & Kuniyoshi, M. S. (2015). Critical factors in the implementation process ofIntegrated Management Systems. Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 12(1), 145-164. doi:10.4301/S1807-17752015000100008Flynn, D. J. (1998). Information system requirement: Determinations andspecification. London: McGraw Hill.Goodhue, D. L. (1995). Understanding user evaluations of information systems.Management Science, 41(12), 1827-1844. doi:10.1287/mnsc.41.12.1827Goodhue, D. L. (1998). Development and measurement validity of a Task- Technology FitInstrument for user evaluations of information systems. Decision Sciences, 29(1), 108-135.Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-technology Fit and individual performance.MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 213-237.Goodhue, D. L., Klein, B. D., & March, S. T. (2000). User evaluations of IS assurrogates for objective performance. Information and Management, 38, 87- 101.Hair, J. E., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L, &.Black, R.L. (2010). Multivariate data analysis withreadings. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice Hall.Heeks, R. (2002). Information systems and developing countries: Failure, success, and localimprovisations. The Information Society, 18, 101-112.Heisler, K. W. (2014). Assessing the fit between child welfare information systems and frontlineworkers: Development of a task-technology fit instrument. Old Dominion University, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. Diperoleh daripadahttp://search.proquest.com.ezpustaka.upsi.edu.my/science/docview/1648980076/C8B7B54CE3BB4171PQ/4?accountid=13155Hemmatfar, M., Salehi, M., & Bayat, M. (2010). Competitive advantages and strategic information systems. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(7), 158-169.Henderson, J. C., & Venkatraman, N. (1993). Strategic alignment: Leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Systems Journal, 38(2), 472-85.Hirschheim, R., & Klein, H. K. (2012). A glorious and not-so-short history ofinformation system field. Journal of Association for Information Systems, 13(4), 188-235.Huang, J., & Hu, Q. (2007). Achieving IT-Business strategic alignment via Enterprise-Wide implementation of balanced scorecards. Information Systems Management, 24, 173-184.Issa-Salwe, A., Ahmed, M., Aloufi, K., & Kabir, M. (2010). Strategic information SystemsAlignment: Alignment of IS/IT with business strategy. Journal of Information ProcessingSystems, 6(1), 121-128. doi:10.3745/JIPS2010.1.121.Jabatan Ketua Menteri Melaka (2018, Januari 22). MSC Malaysia. Diperoleh daripadawww.emelaka.gov.my.Jabatan Pendidikan Perak. (2014, January 12). Senarai sekolah beroperasi di Perak seperti Mac 2017. Diperoleh daripadahttps://ms.wikipedia.org/wiki/Senarai_sekolah_menengah_di_PerakJabatan Pendidikan Perak. (March 18, 2016). Daerah Dalam Negeri Perak.Diperoleh daripada https://ms.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perak_Darul_RidzuanJabatan Pendidikan Perak. (n.d). Direktori sekolah di Perak. Diperoleh daripadahttp://jpnperak.moe.gov.my/jpn/index.php?option=com_wrapper&view=wrapper &Itemid=434&lang=msJackson, S.L. (2011). Research methods and statistics: A Critical Approach. 4?? ed., CengageLearning.Johnson, M. (2013). Critical success factors for B2B e-markets: A strategic fitperspective. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 31(4), 337-366.doi:10.1108/02634501311324843Kanellis, P., Lycett, M., & Paul, R. J. (1999). Evaluating business information systemsfit: From concept to practical application. European Journal of Information Systems, 8,65-76.Kaoutar, E., & Bounabat, B. (2010). Strategic Alignment Assessment Based on Enterprise Architecture International Conference on Information Management and Evaluation, 179-187. Diperoleh daripadahttp://search.proquest.com.ezpustaka.upsi.edu.my/science/docview/869737850/1256EEEB9A08448APQ/7?accountid=13155Kaplan, B., & Maxwell, J. A. (1994.) Qualitative research methods for evaluatingcomputer information. In Evaluating Health Care Information System: Method andApplication, edited by Anderson, J., G., Aydin, C. E., & Jay, S. J., 45-68.. Thousands Oaks, CA:Sage.Kearns, G. S., & Sabherwal, R. (2007). Strategic alignment between business and informationtechnology: A Knowledge-based view of behaviors, outcome, and consequences. Journal ofManagement Information Systems, 23(3), 129- 162.Kenny, D. A. (2015, March 31). Moderator Variables: Introduction. Diperoleh daripadahttp://davidakenny.net/cm/moderation.htmKenpro. (Oktober 23, 2014). Sample size determination using Krejcie and Morgan Table. Diperoleh daripada http//www.kenpro.org/wp- content/uploads/2013/08/ Krejcie-and-Morgan Table-of-Determining- sample-size.pngKirveennummi, M. (1998). Framework for barriers to IS-related changes: Developmentand evaluation of a theoretical model. Ed. by Larsen, T. J., Levine, L., & DeGross,J. I, Laxenburg, In Information System: Current Issues and Future Changes, Proceedings of TheIFIP WG 8.2 and 8.6 Joint Working Conference on Information System. Austria.KPM. (Januari 09, 2017). Penetapan Prosedur pengemaskinian dan verifikasi data dalam ModulPengurusan Guru (eOPERASI) bagi tahun 2017. Diperoleh daripada https://eoperasi.moe.gov.my/surat_siaran/SURAT%20VERIFIKASI%20DATA%20GURU%20EOPERASI%2009012017.pdfKPM. (Julai 11, 2013). Pindaan pengurusan maklumat pengoperasian sekolah menengahdan sekolah rendah melalui e-OPERASI di bawah Sistem Maklumat Guru (SME). Diperolehdaripada http://apps.moe.gov.my/eoperasiKPM. (Jun 06, 2016). Pekeliling ICT KPM Bilangan 1 Tahun 2016. Diperoleh daripada http://www.moe.gov.my/images/pekeliling/2016/circularfile_file_001395.pdfKPM. (n.d). Manual Pengguna- Sistem Pengoperasian Data Secara Online (e-OPERASI). Diperoleh daripada http://apps.moe.gov.my/eoperasiKPM. (n.d). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Negara 2013-2015. Diperoleh daripadahttp://www.moe.gov.my/cms/upload_files/articlefile/2013/articlefile_file_003107. pdfKrejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W., (1970). Krejcie and Morgan Table for DeterminingSample Size. Diperoleh daripada http://www.kenpro.org/tag/krejcie-and-morgan-table-for-determining-sample-size/Kuo, R., & Lee, G. (2011). Knowledge management system adoption: Exploring the effects of empowering leadership, Task-Technology Fit and compatibility. Behaviour & InformationTechnology, 30 (1), 113129.Laudon, K. C., & Laudon, J. P. (2004). Managing information system: Managing the digital firm. 8??Ed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Lean, O., Zailani, S., Ramayah, T., & Fernado, Y. (2009). Factors Influencing Intentionto Use E-government Services among Citizens in Malaysia. International Journal of Information Management, 29(6), 458-475. doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2009.03.012Lee, A. S., & Liebenau, J. (1997). Information systems and qualitative research.Proceeding of IFIP TC8 WG 8 The International Conferences on Information systemand Qualitative research, 31.53.6, Edited by Allen S Lee , Liebanau, J., & Gross, J.I.D.,Chapman Hall.Lee, R. C. (2012). Does the Success of Information Systems Really Matters to FirmPerformance? . iBusiness, 4, 98-107. doi:10.4236/ib.2012.42012Lim Chap Sam, & Chee Kim Mang (2010). Kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan penyelidikan. DalamNoraini Idris (Ed.) Penyelidikan dalam pendidikan, 163-178, Kuala Lumpur: Mc Graw Hill.Lincon, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverley Hill: Sage.Luftman, J. N., & Ben-Zvi, T. (2010). Key issues for IT executives 2009: Difficult economy?simpact on IT. MIS Quarterly Executive, 9 (1), 49-59.Lund, A., & Lund, M. (2016). Standard score. Diperoleh daripadahttps://statistics.laerd.com/statistical-guides/standard-score.phpLuqman Arif Abdul Karim dan Hidir Reduan (2018, Februari 23). Penjajaran semulapendidikan pada pasca PRU 14. Berita Harian Online. Diperoleh daripadahttp://www.bharian.com.myLyytinen, K., & Grover, V. (2017). Management misinformation systems: A time to revisit. Journal ofAssociation for Information Systems, 18(3), 206-230.Lyytinen, K., & Robey, D. (1999). Learning failure in information systems development.Information Systems Journal, 9, 85-101.MacKinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J., & Fritz, M. S. (2010, Feb 10). Mediation Analysis. Diperoleh daripada http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/ pmc2819368Maleki, M., Davoudi, S. M. M., Moradi, H. (2011). Information technology impact on supply chaincapabilities and firm performance: A survey in Iran?s manufacturing companies. International Journal of Research in IT,ment and Engineering, 1(3), 1-21.Martinsons, M G., & Chong, K.C. (1999). The influence of human factors and specialistinvolvement on information success. Human Relations, 52(l), 23- 26.Massa?deh, R., Shannak, R, Maqableh, M. & Tarhini, A. (2017). The impact of knowledgemanagement on job performanace in higher education: The case of the Universiti of Jordan. Journalof Enterprise Information Management, 30(2), 244-262. .doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-09-2105-0087Mclaren, T.S., Head, M. M., Yuan, Y., & Chan,Y. E. (2011). A multilevel model for measuring fitbetween a firm?s competitive strategies and information systems capabilities. MIS Quarterly,35(4), 909-930.McLeod, R., & Schell, G. P. (2004). Management information systems, 9?? Ed.New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.McLeod, S. B. (2008). Correlation. Diperoleh daripada http://www.simplypsychology.org/ correlation.htmlMintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organization. USA: Prentice Hall.MOE. (1997). A Plan for the development of an Education Management InformationSystem for Education Sector. Ministry of Education, MalaysiaMorgeson, F. P., & Hofmann, D. A. (1999). The structure and function of collective constructs: Implications for multilevel research and theory development. The Academy of Management Review, 24, (2), 249-265. Diperoleh daripadahttp://www.jstor.org/stable/259081Muscatello, J. R., & Chen, I. J. (2008). Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)implementations: Theory and practice. International Journal of Enterprise InformationSystems, 4(1), 63-78.Nah, F.H., Islam, Z., & Tan, M. (2007). Empirical assessment of factorsinfluencing success of Enterprise Resource Planning Implementations. Journal ofDatabase Management, 18(4), 26-50.Newsom. (2015). Testing mediation with regression analysis. Diperoleh daripadahttp://www.upa.pdx.edu/IOA/newsom/da2/ho_mediation.pdfNoraini Idris. (2010). Kesahan dalaman. Dalam Noraini Idris (Ed.) Penyelidikan dalampendidikan, 179-193, Kuala Lumpur: Mc Graw Hill.Norshidah Mohamed, & Jasber Kaur. (2011). A conceptual framework for informationtechnology governance effectiveness in private organizations. Information Management & Computer Security, 20(2). doi:10.1108/09685221211235616Oliver, V. (2010). Smart Answers to Tough Business Etiquette Questions. sePublishing, New York USA.Ortega, C. H., Garrido-Vega, P., & Machuca, J. A. D. (2012). Analysis ofinteraction fit between manufacturing strategy and technology management and its impact onperformance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 32(8), 958-981.doi:10.1108/01443571211253146Rahim Utah. (2013). IBM Statistics for windows. Diperoleh daripada http://www.Rahimutah.uitm.edu.my/v25/image/ebook-SPSSversi21-2013.pdfRamayah, T. (2010). The role of voluntariness in distance education students usage of a CourseWebsite. Turkish Online Journal of Education Technology, 9(3), 96-105.doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.06.007Randolph, W. A., Sapienza, H. J., & Watson, M. A. (1991). Technology-structure fit and performancein small businesses: An examination of the moderating effects of organizational states.Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 16(1), 27-42.Ravishankar, M. N., Pan, S. L., & Leidner, D. E. (2010) (Forthcoming). Examining the strategicalignment and implementation success of a KMS: A Subculture based Multi-Level Analysis.Information Systems Research. 22 (1), 39-59. doi:10.1287/isre.1080.0214Reich, B. H., & Benbasat, I. (1996). Measuring linkage between business and informationtechnology objectives. MIS Quarterly, 20(1), 55-82.Ren-Zong Kuo & Gwo-Guang Lee. (2011). Knowledge management system adoption: Exploring theeffects of empowering leadership, Task-Technology Fit and compatibility. Behaviour & InformationTechnology, 30(1), 113129.Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. (2016, Mei 29). Qualitative research methods guidelines projects:Lincoln and Guba's Evaluative Criteria. Diperoleh daripadahttp://www.qualres.org/HomeLinc-3684.htmlRobinson, B. (1994). Social context and conflicting interests in participantunderstanding of information systems failure. Proceedings of the Second Conference of the British Computer Society Information Systems Methodologies Specialist Group, 31August - 2 September, Edinburgh, UK, 235-247.Roztocki, N., & Weistroffer, H. R. (2011). Information technology success actors and models indeveloping and emerging economies. Information Technology for Development, 17(3), 163167.Saarinen, T. (1996). An expanded instrument for evaluating information system success.Information & Management, 31, 103-118.Saifuddin Ahmed. (2009). Methods in Sample Surveys. The Johns Hopkins University and Saifuddin Ahmed. Diperoleh daripadahttp://ocw.jhsph.edu/courses/statmethodsforsamplesurveys/PDFs/Lecture5.pdfSchaupp, L., Carter, L., & McBride, M. (2010). E-file Adoption: A Study of USTaxpayers? Intentions. Computers in Human Behaviour, 26(4), 634-644.doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.12.017Schlosser, F., Wagner, H., & Coltman, T. (2012). Reconsidering the dimensions of business-ITalignment. Proceedings of the 45th Hawaii. International;1; Conference on System Sciences(HICSS), Maui, HI.Selwyn, N. (2011). It?s all about standardisationexploring the digital (Re)configuration of school management and administration. Cambridge Journal of Education, 41(4),473-488.Sha, X., Cheng, Y., Pan, S. L., & Teoh, S.Y. (2011). The implementation success of HealthcareInformation Systems: A business-IT alignment. Perspective. The 19th European Conference onInformation Systems, Helsinki, 1-14.Shahin Dezdar, & Sulaiman Ainin. (2011). The influence of organizational factors on successful ERPimplementation, Management Decision, 49(6), 911-926. doi:10.1108/00251741111143603Srum, H., Medaglia, R., Normann, K., Scott, M., & DeLone, W, (2012). Perceptions ofinformation system success in the public sector Webmasters at the steering wheel? TransformingGovernment: People, Process and Policy, 6(3), 239-257. doi:10.1108/17506161211251254Sousa, K., Mendona, H., Lievyns, A., & Vanderdonckt, J. (2011). Getting users involved in aligningtheir needs with business processes models and systems. Business Process Management Journal, 17(5), 748-786.Tallon, P. P, & Pinsonneault, A. (2011). Competing perspectives on the link between strategic information technology alignment and organizational agility: Insights from aMediation Model. MIS Quarterly 35 (2) 463-486.Tallon, P. P. (2007). A process-oriented perspective on the alignment ofinformation technology and business strategy. Journal Of Management Information Systems,24(3), 227-268.Torabizadeh, M., Khatami R. M &. Noshadi, A. (2012). Effect of information systemstrategies on supply chain and supply chain performance. World Academy of Science andTechnology, 61, 940-945.Ukessays. (March 23, 2015). Examining data accuracy in information system. Diperoleh daripada https://www.ukessays.com/essays/information-technology/examining-data-accuracy-in-information-systems-information- technology-essay.phpUPSI (2015). Buku garis panduan penulisan disertasi/tesis. Diperoleh daripadahttp://www.slideshare.net/bingguts/buku-garis-panduan-penulisan-disertasitesis-2015Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsicmotivation, and emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model. Information Systems Research,11(4), 342-365.Vespanathan Supramaniam (2015). Penggunaan teknologi maklumat dan Komunikasi(TMK) dalam kalangan guru mata pelajaran Kemahiran Hidup di sekolah luar bandar Negeri Johor.Master thesis. Diperoleh daripada http://Eprints. Uthm.edu.my/cgi/oai2Walsham, G. (1993). Interpreting information systems in organizations. Chicester, England: Wiley.Walsham, G. (1995). Interpretive case study in IS research: Nature and method.European Journals of Information Systems, 4, 74-81.Wan Azlinda Wan Mohamed. (2010). Penyelidikan Korelasi. Dalam Noraini Idris (Ed.), Penyelidikandalam pendidikan. 215-228, Kuala Lumpur: Mc Graw Hill.Ward, J., & Giffiths, P. (1997). Strategic planning for information systems, 2?? Ed, John Wiley &Sons, England.Waters, (2015). Correlation research guide lines: Conducting corelation research systems Diperoleh daripada www.capilanou.ca/psychology/student- resources/researchguidelines/corelation-reseach-guidelines/.Weiss, J. W., & Thorogood, A. (2011). Information technology (IT)/Business alignment as a strategic weapon: A diagnostic tool. Engineering Management Journal, 23 (2),30-41.Wikipedia the free encyopedia, (2016, Februari 23). Cluster sampling. Diperoleh daripadahttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cluster_samplingWikipedia, the free encyopedia (2015, November 20). Mediation (Statistics). Diperoleh daripada http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Mediation_%28 statistics%29Xingchen, S. (2012). Descriptive analysis of research on IT/IS evaluation: A 25 YearsReview. International Conference on Information Management and Evaluation, 275-283. Diperoleh daripada http://search.proquest.com.ezpustaka.upsi.edu.my/science/docview/1776778054/Yayla, A. A., & Hu, Q. (2012). The impact of it-business strategic alignment on firm performancein a developing country setting: Exploring moderating roles of environmental uncertainty and strategic orientation. European Journal of Information Systems, 21(4),373-387. doi:10.1057/ejis.2011.52Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. 2?? ed. Newbury k, CA:Sage.Yue-Yang Chen, Shang-Pao Yeh, & Hui-Ling Huang. (2012). Does knowledgemanagement fit matter to business performance? Journal of Knowledge Management, 16 (5).671-687. doi 10.1108/13673271211262745Zaeid, A., N. (2012). An Integrated Success Model for evaluating information system inpublic sector. Journal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information Sciences, 3(8),814-825.Ze-wei Ma, Wei-nan Zeng. (2014). A Multiple Mediator Model: Power analysis based on MonteCarlo Simulation. American Journal of Applied Psychology. 3(3), 72-79. doi:10.11648/j.ajap.20140303.15Zhang, Z., Lee, M.K.O., Huanga, P., Zhang, L. & Huang, X. (2005). A framework of ERP systemsimplementation success in China: An empirical study. International Journal of ProductionEconomics, 98, 56-80.Zigurs, I., & Buckland, B. K. (1998). A Theory of Task/Technology Fit and groupsupport systems effectiveness. MIS Quarterly, 22(3), 313-335.

Similar Items