Kesan modul jom bijak sains terhadap kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi dan kemahiran proses sains bersepadu murid tahun 5
Tujuan kajian ini adalah untuk menentukan kesanns terhadap Kemahiran Proses Sains Bersepadu dan Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi. Kajian ini menggunakan rekabentuk kuasi-eksperimen menggunakan ujian pra dan pasca. Pembinaanmodul ini adalah berasaskan model ADDIE yang terdiri daripada fasa analisis, fa...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | thesis |
Language: | zsm |
Published: |
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5368 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:5368 |
---|---|
record_format |
uketd_dc |
institution |
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
collection |
UPSI Digital Repository |
language |
zsm |
topic |
Q Science |
spellingShingle |
Q Science Hamidah Mat Kesan modul jom bijak sains terhadap kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi dan kemahiran proses sains bersepadu murid tahun 5 |
description |
Tujuan kajian ini adalah untuk menentukan kesanns terhadap Kemahiran Proses Sains Bersepadu dan Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi. Kajian ini menggunakan rekabentuk kuasi-eksperimen menggunakan ujian pra dan pasca. Pembinaanmodul ini adalah berasaskan model ADDIE yang terdiri daripada fasa analisis, fasa rekebentuk, fasa perlaksanaan, fasa penilaian dan fasa perlaksanaan. Fasa penilaianmelibatkan lima orang pakar dalam bidang sains untuk mengesahkan kandungan dankebolehgunaan modul. Sampel kajian terdiri daripada 33 orang pelajar kumpulan rawatan dan33 orang pelajar kumpulan kawalan yang dipilih secara rawak kluster. Instrumen yangdigunakan ialah ujian pra, ujian pasca dan ujian kemahiran proses sains bersepadu.Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahawa terdapat peningkatan pencapaian pada kedua-dua kumpulanrawatan dan kawalan. Namun, kumpulan rawatan menunjukkan peningkatan pencapaian yang lebihtinggi secara signifikan berbanding kumpulan kawalan. Dapatan kajian juga menunjukkanterdapat peningkatan terhadap tahap kemahiran proses sains bersepadu skor ujian pasca kumpulanrawatan (min=33.48, SP=7.843) dan skor ujian kumpulan kawalan (min=17.76, SP=7.718) serta kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi pada kedua-dua kumpulan rawatan (min=70.18, SP=10.86)dan kawalan (min=64.91, SP=9.19) dengan kumpulan rawatan menunjukkan peningkatan pencapaianyang lebih tinggi secara signifikan berbanding kumpulan kawalan. Berdasarkan keputusan ujian-tsampel tidak bersandar bagi kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi mengaplikasi terdapat perbezaan yangsignifikan [t(66), p |
format |
thesis |
qualification_name |
|
qualification_level |
Master's degree |
author |
Hamidah Mat |
author_facet |
Hamidah Mat |
author_sort |
Hamidah Mat |
title |
Kesan modul jom bijak sains terhadap kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi dan kemahiran proses sains bersepadu murid tahun 5 |
title_short |
Kesan modul jom bijak sains terhadap kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi dan kemahiran proses sains bersepadu murid tahun 5 |
title_full |
Kesan modul jom bijak sains terhadap kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi dan kemahiran proses sains bersepadu murid tahun 5 |
title_fullStr |
Kesan modul jom bijak sains terhadap kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi dan kemahiran proses sains bersepadu murid tahun 5 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Kesan modul jom bijak sains terhadap kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi dan kemahiran proses sains bersepadu murid tahun 5 |
title_sort |
kesan modul jom bijak sains terhadap kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi dan kemahiran proses sains bersepadu murid tahun 5 |
granting_institution |
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
granting_department |
Fakulti Pembangunan Manusia |
publishDate |
2019 |
url |
https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5368 |
_version_ |
1747833185226457088 |
spelling |
oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:53682020-11-18 Kesan modul jom bijak sains terhadap kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi dan kemahiran proses sains bersepadu murid tahun 5 2019 Hamidah Mat Q Science Tujuan kajian ini adalah untuk menentukan kesanns terhadap Kemahiran Proses Sains Bersepadu dan Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi. Kajian ini menggunakan rekabentuk kuasi-eksperimen menggunakan ujian pra dan pasca. Pembinaanmodul ini adalah berasaskan model ADDIE yang terdiri daripada fasa analisis, fasa rekebentuk, fasa perlaksanaan, fasa penilaian dan fasa perlaksanaan. Fasa penilaianmelibatkan lima orang pakar dalam bidang sains untuk mengesahkan kandungan dankebolehgunaan modul. Sampel kajian terdiri daripada 33 orang pelajar kumpulan rawatan dan33 orang pelajar kumpulan kawalan yang dipilih secara rawak kluster. Instrumen yangdigunakan ialah ujian pra, ujian pasca dan ujian kemahiran proses sains bersepadu.Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahawa terdapat peningkatan pencapaian pada kedua-dua kumpulanrawatan dan kawalan. Namun, kumpulan rawatan menunjukkan peningkatan pencapaian yang lebihtinggi secara signifikan berbanding kumpulan kawalan. Dapatan kajian juga menunjukkanterdapat peningkatan terhadap tahap kemahiran proses sains bersepadu skor ujian pasca kumpulanrawatan (min=33.48, SP=7.843) dan skor ujian kumpulan kawalan (min=17.76, SP=7.718) serta kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi pada kedua-dua kumpulan rawatan (min=70.18, SP=10.86)dan kawalan (min=64.91, SP=9.19) dengan kumpulan rawatan menunjukkan peningkatan pencapaianyang lebih tinggi secara signifikan berbanding kumpulan kawalan. Berdasarkan keputusan ujian-tsampel tidak bersandar bagi kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi mengaplikasi terdapat perbezaan yangsignifikan [t(66), p 2019 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5368 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5368 text zsm closedAccess Masters Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Pembangunan Manusia A.Rahman Haron, Zamri Mahamod, Mohamed Amin Embi, Nik Mohd Rahimi NikYusof, Sharifah Nor Puteh & Jamaludin Badusah. (2012). Teknik salak dalam menjana idea membinaayat dengan cepat dan efektif. Jurnal Pendidikan, 2(2), 8493. Retrieved from manlaoshi@gmail.comAbdul Jamir, M. S., Ab. Halim, T., &Adawiyah, I. (2012). Pembelajaran Aktif dalamPengajaran dan Pembelajaran Berkesan Pendidikan Islam. Jurnal IPG Kampus Pendidikan Islam,122.Abdul Rasid, J. H. I. (2013). Pelaksanaan pembelajaran menyeronokkan dalampengajaran dan pembelajaran Bahasa Melayu. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu, 3, 4963.Ahmad, J., Noah, S. M., Kadir, R. A., Ahmad, H., &Pendidikan, F. P. (2005).Keberkesanan Modul Program Maju Diri ke atas Motivasi Pencapaian di Kalangan Pelajar Sekolah Menengah di Negeri Selangor. Retrieved fromhttp://www.ipbl.edu.my/portal/penyelidikan/seminarpapers/2005/sidekUPM.pdfAmabile, T. M. (1996).Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview.Amabile, T.M et. al (1999). Breakthrough Thinking. Boston: Harvard Business Scholl PressAsh, K. (2011). Programming Digital Fun Into Science Education. Education Week, DigitalDirections, 4, 1819.Ausubel, D. P. (1965). Perception versus cognition in meaningful verbal learning. Journal of General Psychology 73(2), 185187.http://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1965.9710712Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Facilitation Meaningful Verbal Learning in the Classroom. The ArithmeticTeacher, 15(2), 126132. http://doi.org/10.1080/00461527709529171Aziz & Lin, H. L. (2010). Hubungan Sikap Terhadap Mata Pelajaran Sains DenganPenguasaan Konsep Asas Sains Pelajar Tingkatan Dua. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.Aziz Nordin & Lin, L. H. (2011a). Hubungan SikapTerhadap Mata Pelajaran Sains DenganPenguasaan Konsep Asas Sains Pelajar Tingkatan Dua. Of Science & Mathematics EducationalJ,2, 89101.Aziz Nordin & Lin, L. H. (2011b). Hubungan Sikap Terhadap Mata Pelajaran Sains DenganPenguasaan Konsep Asas Sains Pelajar Tingkatan Dua. Journal of Science& Mathematics Educational, 2, 89101.Babadogan, C., & nal, F. (2011). Examples of instructional design for social studiesaccording to meaningful learning and information processing theories. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 21552158.http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.070Barak, M., &Dori, Y. J. (2009). Enhancing higher order thinking skills amonginservicescience teachers via embedded assessment. Journal of Science Teacher Education,20(5), 459474. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-009-9141-zBloom, B. (1957). Learning domains or Blooms taxonomy. Retrieved November, 6, 2007.Bloom, B. S., Englehard, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., Krathwohl, D. R., & Committee of Collegeand University Examiners. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification ofeducational goals: Handbook I, cognitive domain. New York, 16, 207.http://doi.org/10.1300/J104v03n01_03Bodrova, E., & Leong, D. J. (2003). Chopsticks and counting chips: Do play and foundational skillsneed to competefor the teachers attention in an early childhood classroom?Young Children, 58,10-17.Brandoni, C., & Anderson, O. R. (2009). A New Neurocognitive Model for AssessingDivergent Thinking: Applicability, Evidence of Reliability, and Implications forEducational Theory and Practice. Creativity Research Journal.http://doi.org/10.1080/10400410903297352Bruce, T. (2001). Learning through play: Babies, toddlers and the foundation years.London: Hodder & StoughtonBruner, J. S. (1960). The Process of Education. In The Process of Education (pp. 1213).http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004Buntat, Y., Sharliana, N., Nasir, M., & Pendidikan, F. (2011). Faktor-Faktor Yang MendorongKreativiti Di Kalangan. Journal Educational Psychology and Counseling, 2, 175208.akir, N. K., & Sarikaya, M. (2010). An evaluation of science process skills of theScience Teaching majors. In Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 9, pp. 15921596).http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.370epni, S., &Kele?, E. (2006). Turkish students conceptions about the simple electriccircuits. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4, 269291.http://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-005-9001-zChowning, J. T., Griswold, J. C., Kovarik, D. N., & Collins, L. J. (2012). Fosteringcritical thinking, reasoning, and argumentation skills through bioethics education. PLoSONE, 7(5). http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036791Chua, Y. P. (2012). Kaedah dan statistik penyelidikan buku 2: Asas statistik penyelidikan(Edisi kedua). KualaLumpur: McGraw-Hill (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Statistical PowerAnalysis for the Behavioral Sciences. http://doi.org/10.1234/12345678Coil, D., Wenderoth, M. P., Cunningham, M., & Dirks, C. (2010). Teaching the processof science: Faculty perceptions and an effective methodology. CBE Life SciencesEducation, 9(4), 524535. http://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.10-01-0005Collins, A. (2013). Neuroscience meets music education: Exploring the implications ofneural processing models on music education practice. International Journal ofMusic Education, 31(2), 217231. http://doi.org/10.1177/0255761413483081Dani Asmadi Ibrahim, K. O. (2011). Kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi, pengajaran tajukmodel atom dan pencapaian objektif kursus kimia. Prosiding Seminar MajlisDekan?dekan Pendidikan IPTA2011, 105122.David, C. @ L., &Ambotang, A. S. (2014). Profesionalisme Guru Novis dalamPengurusan Pengetahuan, Kesediaan Mengajar dan Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi(KBAT) Terhadap Pelaksanaan Pengajaran di Sekolah. Seminar KebangsaanIntegriti Keluarga 2014, 115. Retrieved fromhttp://www.ums.edu.my/fpp/images/download/proseding_skik2014/Caroline__lorena_david.pdfDeCarvalho, R. J. (1991). The humanistic paradigm in education. The HumanisticPsychologist, 19(l), 88104. http://doi.org/10.1080/08873267.1991.9986754Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking tothe educative process. Book. http://doi.org/10.1037/10903-000DeWitt, D. (2010). Development of collaborative mLearning module on nutrition for FormTwo students.Tesis PhD. Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Malaya.Dick, W. (1996). The dick and carey model: Will it survive the decade? EducationalTechnology Research and Development, 44(3), 5563.http://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300425Dickson, P. P., Jln, K. M., Si, P., & Port, R. (2011). Hubungan antara minat , sikapdengan pencapaian pelajar dalam kursus CC301 quantity measurement.Dornyei, Z. (2001). Motivational Strategies in the Language Classroom. UnitedKingdom: Cambridge University Press.Eggen, P., & Kauchak, D. (2010). Assessing Classroom Learning. EducationalPsychology: Windows on Classrooms, 430469.Fata-Hartley, C. (2011). Resisting rote: The importance of active learning for all courselearning objectives. Journal of College Science Teaching, 40(3), 3639.Fatin Aliah Phang, Mohd Salleh Abu, Mohammad Bilal Ali, &Salmiza Salleh. (2012a).Faktor penyumbang kepada kemerosotan penyertaan pelajar dalam aliran sains: satuanalisis sorotan tesis. Medc2012, 17. http://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2011v36n3.2Fatin Aliah Phang, MohdSalleh Abu, Mohammad Bilal Ali, &Salmiza Salleh. (2012b).Faktor penyumbang kepada kemerosotan penyertaan pelajar dalam aliran sains: satuanalisis sorotan tesis. MEDC2012, 17.Fazliza Che Amat, Zurida Ismail, Nooraida Yakob, & Abdul Majeed Ahmad. (2011).Perlaksanaan Sains KSSR Tahun Satu: Satu Tinjauan Awal. Seminar KebangsaanMajlis Dekan IPTA 2012, 18.Folashade, A., & Akinbobola, A. O. (2009). Constructivist Problem-Based LearningTechnique and the Academic Achievement of Physics Students with LowAbility Level in Nigerian Secondary Schools. Eurasian J. Phys. Chem. Educ. 1(1),45-51. Retrieved September 13, 2010 fromhttp://eurasianjournals.com/index.php/ejpce/article/viewFile/34/59Forehand, M. (2010). Bloom s Taxonomy : Original and revised. Emerging Perspectiveson Learning, Teaching, and Technology, 12. Retrieved fromhttp://www4.edumoodle.at/gwk/pluginfile.php/109/mod_resource/content/5/forehand_bloomschetaxonomie02.pdfFreeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H.,&Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance inscience, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy ofSciences of the United States of America, 111, 84105.http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111Fullan, M. & Promfret, A. (1977) Research on Curriculum and InstructionImplementation. Review of Educational Research, 47(1), pp. 335 - 397.Gagn, R. M. (1965). The Learning of Concepts. The School Review, 75, 187-196.George. D., & Mallery. M. (2010). SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Aimple Guideand Reference. Boston : PearsonGriffin, M. (2011). Developing Deliberative Minds- Piaget , Vygotsky and theDeliberative Democratic Citizen. Journal of Public Deliberation, 7(1), 128.Grove, N. P., & Lowery Bretz, S. (2012). A continuum of learning: from rotememorization to meaningful learning in organic chemistry. Chemistry EducationResearch and Practice, 13(3), 201. http://doi.org/10.1039/c1rp90069bHamidah Maidinsah & Merza Abbas. (2001). Pemikiran saintifik dan kaitannyadengan matematik dikalangan pelajar IPT. Simposium Kebangsaan Sains danMatematik ke-9, UKM, 2001Hamidah Maidinsah. (2004). Kesan kaedah pengajaran metakognisi-inkuiri terhadapprestasi dalam matematik dan penaakulan saintifik di kalangan pelajar diploma.TesisPh.D (Tidak diterbitkan). Universiti Sains Malaysia.Hammond, S. I. (2014). Childrens early helping in action: Piagetian developmentaltheory and early prosocial behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 759.http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00759Hazrulrizawati Bt Abd Hamid.(2007). Perbandingan Tahap Penguasaan KemahiranProsesSains Dan Cara Penglibatan PelajarDalam Kaedah Amali Tradisional DenganKaedah Makmal Mikro Komputer.Sarjana, Universiti Teknologi MalaysiaHeong, Y. M., Othman, W. B., Yunos, J. Bin, Kiong, T. T., Hassan, R. Bin, Mohaffyza,M., &Mohamad, B. (2011). The Level of Marzano Higher Order Thinking Skillsamong Technical Education Students. International Journal of Social Science andHumanity, 1, 121125.Honey, M. A., & Hilton, M. (2011). Learning Science Through Computer Games andSimulations. Social Sciences (Vol. 42).Hsu, J. T.-S. 1997. Value, expectancy, metacognition, resource management, andacademic achievement: A structural model of self-regulated learning in a distanceeducation context. Unpublished Ph.D., University of Southern California, California.Huitt, W. (2001 1988). Humanism and open education [ElectronicVersion]. Educational Psychology Interaction. Retrieved March 28, 2011. Fromhttp://chiron.valdosta.edu/whuitt/col/affsys/humed.htmlInternational Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achevement, IEA. (2015).TIMSS 2015 INTERNATIONAL RESULTS IN SCIENCE. New directions foryouth development (Vol. 2015). Retrieved fromhttp://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3295935&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstractIkhsan Othman, &RohizaniYaakub. (2010). Aplikasi Teori Kecerdasan Pelbagai DalamPelaksanaan Kurikulum. Asia Pasific Journal of Educators and Education, 25, 2132.Jamaludin Ramli, &Naswa Jusoh. (2011). Hubungan antara sikap, konsep kendiri,motivasi dan lokus kawalan dengan pencapaian akademik pelajar tingkatan tigakelas aliran agama di sekolah menengah daerah Kulaijaya. Journal of EducationalPsychology & Counseling, 3(September), 1835.Jamian, S. O. R. (2011). STANDARD SEKOLAH RENDAH, 292312.Kamii, C., & Yasuhiko, K. (2006). Play and mathematics at ages one to ten. In Fromberg,D. P. & D. Bergen (Eds.),Play from Birth to Twelve, (2nd ed.), pp. 187198. NewYork: Taylor and Francis Group.Lee dan Ginsburg (2009)Kamisah Osman, Zanaton Haji Iksan, & Lilia Halim. (2007). Sikap terhadap Sains danSikap Saintifik di kalangan Pelajar Sains. Jurnal Pendidikan, 32, 3960.Karamustafao?lu, S. (2011). Improving the Science Process Skills Ability of ScienceStudent Teachers Using I Diagrams. Eurasian Journal of Physics and ChemistryEducation, 3, 2638.Karpicke, J. D. (2012). Retrieval-Based Learning: Active Retrieval Promotes MeaningfulLearning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(3), 157163.http://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412443552Kato, K. (2013). Quasi-Bayesian analysis of nonparametric instrumental variablesmodels. The Annals of Statistics, 41(5), 23592390. http://doi.org/10.1214/13-AOS1150Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia (2013). Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi. KualaLumpur: Dewan Bahasa & Pustaka.Keppel, G. (1991). Design and analysis: A researchers handbook (3rd ed.). Design andanalysis: A researchers handbook (3rd ed.).Ketelhut, D. J., Nelson, B. C., Clarke, J., & Dede, C. (2010). A multi-user virtualenvironment for building and assessing higher order inquiry skills in science. BritishJournal of Educational Technology, 41(1), 5668. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01036.xKrathwohl, D. R. (2002). A Revision of Bloom s Taxonomy : An Overview. TheoryInto Practice, 41(4), 212218. http://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104Kurtzberg, T. R., & Amabile, T. M. (2001). From Guilford to Creative Synergy: Openingthe Black Box of Team-Level Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3-4),285294. http://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_06Leahey, T. H. (2000). Control: A history of behavioural psychology. The Journal ofAmerican History, 87(2), 686-687.Lee, L.H (1997). Goal orientation, goal Setting, and achievement performance in collegestudents: An integrated model of achievement motivation in school settings.Loureno, O. (2012a). Piaget and Vygotsky: Many resemblances, and a crucialdifference. New Ideas in Psychology, 30(3), 281295.http://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2011.12.006Loureno, O. (2012b). Piaget and Vygotsky: Many resemblances, and a crucialdifference. New Ideas in Psychology, 30(3), 281295.http://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2011.12.006MacArthur, V., &Conlan, O. (2010). Modeling higher-order cognitive skills intechnology enhanced distance learning. In ICDLE 2010 - 2010 4th InternationalConference on Distance Learning and Education, Proceedings (pp. 1519).http://doi.org/10.1109/ICDLE.2010.5606049Madhuri, G. V, Kantamreddi, V. S. S. N., &Goteti, L. N. S. P. (2012). Promoting higherorder thinking skills using inquiry-based learning. European Journal of EngineeringEducation, 37(2), 117123. http://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2012.661701Mayer, R. E. (2002). Rote Versus Meaningful Learning. Theory Into Practice, 41(4),226232. http://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_4McGregor, A. (2007). Fifty Key Thinkers on Development. Singapore Journal ofTropical Geography (Vol. 28). http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9493.2007.00298.xMichael, A. S., Veeravagu, J., Muthusamy, C., Marimuthu, R., &Subrayan, A. (2010).Using Bloom s Taxonomy to Gauge Students Reading ComprehensionPerformance. CANADIAN SOCIAL SCIENCE, 6, 205212.Nazir M. Z. (2010). Problem-Based Learning On Students Critical Thinking Skills InTeaching Business Education In Malaysia: A Literature Review. American Journalof Business Education, 3, 1932. Retrieved fromhttp://search.proquest.com/docview/516344956?accountid=27240 LA - EnglishMokhtar, M. Z., Tarmizi, M. A. A., Tarmizi, R. A., & Ayub, A. F. M. (2010).Problem-based learning in calculus course: Perception, engagement andperformance. Latest Trends on Engineering Education, 21-25. Retreived March10, 2011, fromhttp://www.wseas.us/elibrary/conferences/2010/Corfu/EDUCATION/EDUCATION-01.pdfMller, U., Burman, J. T., & Hutchison, S. M. (2013). The developmental psychology ofJean Piaget: A quinquagenary retrospective. Journal of Applied DevelopmentalPsychology, 34(1), 5255. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2012.10.001Murchison, C. A., Adler, A., & American Psychological Association. (1930).Psychologies of 1930. The International University Series in Psychology.Murphy, C., Bianchi, L., McCullagh, J., & Kerr, K. (2013). Scaling up higher orderthinking skills and personal capabilities in primary science: Theory-into-policy-intopractice.Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10, 173188.http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.06.005Murphy, C., Murphy, C., &Kilfeather, P. (2010). Children Making Sense of Science.Research in Science Education, 41(2), 283298. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-010-9165-6 Business Education, 3(6).Najib Ghafar, M., & Rauf Ibrahim, A. (2011). Penilaian Hubungan Tahap PenguasaanKonsepsi Sains Dengan Tahap Kemahiran Proses Sains Guru Peringkat MenengahRendah. Journal of Science and Mathematics Educational, 3, 119.Norakma, M. D., Abdul Razak, A., & NoriaMunirah, Y. (2015). PembelajaranBerteraskan Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi (KBAT) Di Dalam Pengajaran DanPembelajaran Mata Pelajaran Sejarah. 7th International Seminar on RegionalEducation, 1, 352360.Nordin, A., & Ling, L. H. (2011). Hubungan Sikap Terhadap Mata Pelajaran SainsDengan Penguasaan Konsep Asas Sains Pelajar Tingkatan Dua. Of Science &Mathematics EducationalJ, 2, 89101.Norhapizah, M. B., Ab. Halim, T., & Norazah, M. N. (2016). Penerimaan ModulPembelajaran Digital Berasaskan Strategi Blended Learning (e-CITAC) DalamKursus TITAS. The Online Journal of Islamic Education, 4(116), 116. Retrievedfrom http://e-journal.um.edu.my/filebank/published_article/9698/(1-16)PenerimaanModul PembelajaranDigital.pdf%5Cnhttp://ojie.um.edu.my/filebank/published_article/9698/(1-16)Penerimaan Modul Pembelajaran Digital.pdfNovak, J. D. (2002). Meaningful Learning: The Essential Factor for Conceptual Changein Limited or Inappropriate Propositional Hierarchies Leading to Empowerment ofLearners. Science Education, 86(4), 548571. http://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10032Novak, J. D. (2013). MEANINGFUL LEARNING IS THE FOUNDATION FORCREATIVITY *, 2738.Nur Farhanah Bt Mohd Amin. (2011). Keberkesanan Kaedah Nyanyian DalamMeningkatkan Ingatan Murid Tahun 5 Bagi Tajuk Kitaran Air. Tesis IjazahSarjana Muda Perguruan (dengan Kepujian) yang belum diterbitkan, KualaTerengganu, Terengganu: Institut Pendidikan Guru Dato Razali Ismail.NurHanis Mohd Hatta. (2012). Keberkesanan Penggunaan Kaedah Bermain DalamPengajaran dan Pembelajaran Asuhan Tilawah al-Quran Tahun 4. In SeminarPenyelidikan Tindakan IPG (pp. 3444).Nutbrown, C. (1994). Threads of thinking: Young children learning and the role of earlyeducation. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.Othman, A., Talib, O., & Ibrahim, D. A. (2015). Analisis Dokumen Silibus KimiaOrganik Matrikulasi Berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom. Jurnal Kurikulum &Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, Bil 3(3), 2031.Owocki, G. (1991). Literacy through play. Portsmouth, NH:Heinemann.Padilla, M. J., Okey, J. R., & Garrard, K. (1984). The effects of instruction on integratedscience process skill achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21(3),277287. http://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660210305Piaget, J. (1953). The origins of intelligence in children. Journal of ConsultingPsychology, 17(6), 467467. http://doi.org/10.1037/h0051916Piaget, J. (1971). Psychology and epistemology. Orion Press book.Piaget, J. (1976). To understand is to invent: The future of education. New York: PenguinBooks.Piaget, J. (2006). Piagets theory. In Childhood cognitive development: The essentialredings (pp. 3347). http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-46323-5_2Pintrich, P.R & DeGroot, E.V (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning componentsof classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology 82 (1): 33-40.Pintrich, P. R. & Schunk, D. H. 1996. Motivation In Education: Theory, Research AndApplications. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall Inc. Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F.,Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. 1991. A Manual For The Use Of The MotivatedStrategies For Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Michigan: University of Michigan.Prosser, M., &Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching: the experiencein higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology (Vol. 30). Retrievedfrom http://books.google.com/books?id=aWydAAAAMAAJ&pgis=1Quickly, S. (2012). Teknik salak dalammenjana idea membina ayat dengan cepat danefektif, 2, 8493.Rambli, D. R. A., Matcha, W., &Sulaiman, S. (2013). Fun learning with AR alphabetbook for preschool children. In Procedia Computer Science (Vol. 25, pp. 211219).http://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.11.026Rasid Jamian, A., Nadiah Razali, Nurul, & Othman, Shamsudin. (2016). Applications ofFun Learning Technique in Improving Achievement in Malay Language Essay.Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 41(1), 3945.Rauf, R. A. A., Rasul, M. S., Mansor, A. N., Othman, Z., & Lyndon, N. (2013).Inculcation of science process skills in a science classroom. Asian Social Science,9(8), 4757. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n8p47Robiatul Adawiah, J., & Halimah, Z. B. (2011). Pembangunan Perisian Cerita AnimasiInteraktif untuk Pendidikan Sains. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan Malaysia, 1, 518.Roden, I., Kreutz, G., &Bongard, S. (2012). Effects of a school-based instrumental musicprogram on verbal and visual memory in primary school children: A longitudinalstudy. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(DEC). http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00572Rotfeld, H. H. (2007). Theory, data, interpretations, and more theory. The Journal ofConsumer Affairs, 41(2), 376-380.Rutten, N., Van Joolingen, W. R., & Van Der Veen, J. T. (2012a). The learning effects ofcomputer simulations in science education. Computers and Education, 58, 136153.http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.017Rutten, N., Van Joolingen, W. R., & Van Der Veen, J. T. (2012b). The learning effects ofcomputer simulations in science education. Computers and Education, 58(1), 136153.Saedah Siraj, Norlidah Alias, Dorothy DeWitt, & Zaharah Hussin. (2013). Design anddevelopmentalresearch: Emergent trends in educational research. Kuala Lumpur: PearsonMalaysia.2.1.2 Salasiah Z. et a l(2016). Pembinaan dan penentusahan instrumen ujiankemahiran proses2.1.2 sains bersepadu sekolah rendah.(Tesis Sarjana tidak diterbitkan).Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Perak.Salawati, S., & Fatin, A. P. A. (2011). Penguasaan Kemahiran Proses Sains BersepaduDalam Ujian Amali Dan Ujian Bertulis Fizik Tingkatan 4. Journal of Edupres,1(September), 301305.Saul, C., &Wuttke, H.-D. (2011a). Personalized assessment of higher-order thinkingskills. In CSEDU 2011 - Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference onComputer Supported Education (Vol. 2, pp. 425430). Retrieved fromhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-80053016550&partnerID=40&md5=513388d2683c3e7c2ee01b3b855059ceSaul, C., &Wuttke, H.-D. (2011b). Personalized assessment of higher-order thinkingskills. In CSEDU 2011 - Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference onComputer Supported Education (Vol. 2, pp. 425430).Sawyers, J. K. & Rogers, C. S. (1998). Helping children develop through play: Apracticalguide for parents, caregivers and teachers. Washington, DC: National Associationfor the Education of Young Children.Schneider, J. (2010). Was Bloom s Taxonomy Pointed in the Wrong Direction ? PhiDelta Kappan, (December 2009), 5661.Selcuk, G. S. (2010). The effects of problem-based learning on pre-service teachersachievement, approaches and attitudes towards learning physics. InternationalJournal of the Physical Sciences, 5(6), 711-723. Retrieved May 2, 2011 fromhttp://www.academicjournals.org/ijps/PDF/pdf2010/Jun/Sel%C3%A7uk.pdfShaffe Mohd Daud, Ramli Basri, Roselan Baki, Sahandri Ghani Hamzah, & MokhtarNawawi. (2011). Pengaruh Amalan Jenaka Terhadap Pengajaran dan PembelajaranMurid. Asia Pasific Journal of Educators and Education, 26(1), 125144.Shahali, E. H. M., & Halim, L. (2010a). Development and validation of a test ofintegrated science process skills. In Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (Vol.9, pp. 142146). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.127SharifahNorPuteh, & Ali, A. (2011).Pendekatanbermaindalampengajaranbahasadanliterasi bagi pendidikanprasekolah.JurnalPendidikanBahasaMelayu 1, 1, 115.Sharifah Nor Puteh, Nor AdibahGhazali, MohdMahzanTamyis, A. A. Keprihatinan GuruBahasaMelayuDalamMelaksanakanKemahiranBerfikirSecaraKritis Dan Kreatif, 2JurnalPendidikanBahasaMelayu 1931 (2012).Skinner, B. F. (1965). Review lecture: The technology of teaching. The Royal Society ofLondon, Series B, Biological Sciences, 162(969), 427443.http://doi.org/10.1145/585882.585885Smith, L. (2010). Piaget: Recent work. In International Encyclopedia of Education (pp.218224). http://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00485-1Strayer, J. F. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation,innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research, 15(2), 171193.http://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-012-9108-4Syed Anwar Aly & Merza Abbas. (2000). Penyerapan kemahiran saintifik dalamproses pengajaran dan pembelajaran kimia di sekolah menengah. SimposiumPendidikan Sains dan Matematik UiTM, Shah Alam, pada 3 November 2000.Tan Ming Tang, & Chin TeoiPeng. (2001). SatuTinjauanAwalKonsepsiKemahiranProses Sains Di Kalangan Guru Sains PKPG 14 Minggu diMaktabPerguruanBatuLintang. MaktabPerguruanBatuLintang. Retrieved fromhttp://www.ipbl.edu.my/portal/penyelidikan/2001/2001_9_tanmt.pdfMuhyddinYassin. (2013). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025.PetikanUcapan Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin Ketika Membentangkan Laporan AwalPelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025 Pada 13/9/2012, 112.http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007Tek, O. E., &Mohd Al-JunaidiMohamad. (2013). Pembinaan dan penentusahaninstrument kemahiran proses sains untuk sekolah menengah. Jurnal Teknologi(Sciences and Engineering), 66(1), 720. http://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v66.1748TIMSS (2015)http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2015/encyclopedia/countries/malaysia/the-sciencecurriculum-in-primary-and-lower-secondary-grades/Ultanir, E. (2012). An Epistemological Glance at the Constructivist Approach:Constructivist Learning in Dewey, Piaget, and Montessori. International Journal ofInstruction, 5(2), 195 212.Van Zile-Tamsen, C.V (1998). Examining metacognitive self-regulation within the context ofdaily academic tasks. Doctoral Dissertation, The State University of New York, 1998.Dissertation Abstracts International 44 (11A): 3320.Vighnarajah, Wong Su Luan & Kamariah Abu Bakar. (2008). The shift in the role ofteachersin the learning process. European Journal of Social Sciences, 7 (2).Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. Mind andSociety. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79572-3Webb, J. L. (2007). Pragmatisms (Plural) part I: Classical pragmatism and someimplicationsfor empirical inquiry. Journal of Economic Issues, 41(4), 1063-1087.Wen, X., Elicker, J. G., & Mc Mullen, M. B. (2011). Early childhood teacherscurriculumbelief: Are they consistent with observed classroom practices? Early Education andDevelopment, 22(6), 945 969Wiersma, W. (1991). Introduction to research methods in education. British Journal ofEducational Technology (Vol. 40). Retrieved fromhttp://www.coursesmart.com/9780137144556Yaman, S., & Yalc?n, N. (2005). The effect of problem based instruction in scienceteaching on creative thinking. Ilkog?retim Online, 4(1), 4552.Yunos, J. M., Kiong, T. T., Heong, Y. M., Hussein, A., & Sumarwati, S. (2013).Pengintegrasian Kemahiran berfikir Aras TInggi Menerusi Peta Minda DalamPengajaran dan Pembelajaran. FRGS Vot 0741.Zaid, N. M., & Mohamad, F. (2010). Pembangunan Modul Multimedia InteraktifMenggunakan Pendekatan Pembelajaran Berasaskan Senario Bagi TajukPembangunan Perisian Multimedia Berasaskan. Tajuk Pembangunan PerisianMultimedia . Retrieved from http://eprints.utm.my/11329/Zakiah Mohamad Ashari, Azlina Mohd. Kosnin, & Yeo KeeJiar. (2013). KeberkesananModul Belajar Melalui Bermain Terhadap Kefahaman Pengalaman PranomborKanak-kanak Prasekolah. 2nd International Seminar on Quality and AffordableEducation (ISQAE 2013), 305312. |