Faktor penentu penerimaan,penggunaan dan keterlibatan aplikasi mudah alih 'Mclass' dalam kalangan pelajar universiti awam, Malaysia

Penggunaan peranti mudah alih dalam pendidikan telah membawa perubahan besarkepada sistem pendidikan tradisional melalui kemunculan pembelajaran mudah alih(m-pembelajaran). Peranti mudah alih dilihat berpotensi untuk menyokongpembelajaran yang lebih demokratik, fleksibel, autonomi, menyeluruh sertam...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Syaza Hazwani Zaini
Format:	thesis
Language:	zsm
Published:	2017
Subjects:	LB Theory and practice of education
Online Access:	https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5397
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:5397
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
collection	UPSI Digital Repository
language	zsm
topic	LB Theory and practice of education
spellingShingle	LB Theory and practice of education Syaza Hazwani Zaini Faktor penentu penerimaan,penggunaan dan keterlibatan aplikasi mudah alih 'Mclass' dalam kalangan pelajar universiti awam, Malaysia
description	Penggunaan peranti mudah alih dalam pendidikan telah membawa perubahan besarkepada sistem pendidikan tradisional melalui kemunculan pembelajaran mudah alih(m-pembelajaran). Peranti mudah alih dilihat berpotensi untuk menyokongpembelajaran yang lebih demokratik, fleksibel, autonomi, menyeluruh sertamenyokong pembelajaran formal dan tidak formal. Namun demikian, mpembelajarandi universiti awam merupakan bidang baru dan kadar penggunaannyaperlahan. Ini disebabkan penolakan pengguna untuk menerima sesuatu teknologiyang mengakibatkan pelaksanaannya berakhir dengan kegagalan.Kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengenal pasti faktor yang menentukan penerimaan,penggunaan dan keterlibatan pelajar dalam aplikasi mudah alih MClass dalamkalangan pelajar di universiti awam. MClass merupakan satu aplikasi mudah alihyang membolehkan capaian akses cepat kepada Internet dari peranti mudah alihkepada kandungan kursus. Konsep MClass mirip kepada Sistem PengurusanPembelajaran (LMS) namun ia merupakan satu aplikasi yang perlu dimuat turun darisistem operasi Android secara atas talian. Antara kategori maklumat yangditawarkan menerusi MCIass adalah pengumuman, bahan kursus, forum, kuiz at astalian, gred peperiksaan serta senarai pelajar,Kajian berpandukan Teori Bersepadu Penerimaan dan Penggunaan Teknologi(UTAUT) yang melibatkan pemboleh ubah seperti jangkaan usaha, jangkaanprestasi, pengaruh sosial, kondisi pemudahcara, hasrat periakuan, tingkah lakupenggunaan serta keterlibatan. Kajian korelasi dengan menggunakan soal selidikbagi tujuan pengumpulan data. Seramai 299 orang pelajar Ijazah Sarjana Muda Pendidikan (lSMP) di Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris yang mengambil kursusPengurusan Pembelajaran dan mendaftar sebagai pengguna MClass telah dipilihsecara rawak. Data di analisis menggunakan Model Persamaan Berstruktur (SEM)menggunakan perisian AMOS bagi melaksanakan Analisis Faktor Penerokaan(EFA) dan Analisis Pengesahan Faktor (CFA).Hasil ujian model struktural menunjukkan lima daripada enam hipotesis kesanlangsung adalah signifikan iaitu; a) jangkaan prestasi memberi kesan kepada hasratperlakuan (?=.723, p
format	thesis
qualification_name
qualification_level	Doctorate
author	Syaza Hazwani Zaini
author_facet	Syaza Hazwani Zaini
author_sort	Syaza Hazwani Zaini
title	Faktor penentu penerimaan,penggunaan dan keterlibatan aplikasi mudah alih 'Mclass' dalam kalangan pelajar universiti awam, Malaysia
title_short	Faktor penentu penerimaan,penggunaan dan keterlibatan aplikasi mudah alih 'Mclass' dalam kalangan pelajar universiti awam, Malaysia
title_full	Faktor penentu penerimaan,penggunaan dan keterlibatan aplikasi mudah alih 'Mclass' dalam kalangan pelajar universiti awam, Malaysia
title_fullStr	Faktor penentu penerimaan,penggunaan dan keterlibatan aplikasi mudah alih 'Mclass' dalam kalangan pelajar universiti awam, Malaysia
title_full_unstemmed	Faktor penentu penerimaan,penggunaan dan keterlibatan aplikasi mudah alih 'Mclass' dalam kalangan pelajar universiti awam, Malaysia
title_sort	faktor penentu penerimaan,penggunaan dan keterlibatan aplikasi mudah alih 'mclass' dalam kalangan pelajar universiti awam, malaysia
granting_institution	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
granting_department	Fakulti Pembangunan Manusia
publishDate	2017
url	https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5397
_version_	1747833191116308480
spelling	oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:53972020-11-26 Faktor penentu penerimaan,penggunaan dan keterlibatan aplikasi mudah alih 'Mclass' dalam kalangan pelajar universiti awam, Malaysia 2017 Syaza Hazwani Zaini LB Theory and practice of education Penggunaan peranti mudah alih dalam pendidikan telah membawa perubahan besarkepada sistem pendidikan tradisional melalui kemunculan pembelajaran mudah alih(m-pembelajaran). Peranti mudah alih dilihat berpotensi untuk menyokongpembelajaran yang lebih demokratik, fleksibel, autonomi, menyeluruh sertamenyokong pembelajaran formal dan tidak formal. Namun demikian, mpembelajarandi universiti awam merupakan bidang baru dan kadar penggunaannyaperlahan. Ini disebabkan penolakan pengguna untuk menerima sesuatu teknologiyang mengakibatkan pelaksanaannya berakhir dengan kegagalan.Kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengenal pasti faktor yang menentukan penerimaan,penggunaan dan keterlibatan pelajar dalam aplikasi mudah alih MClass dalamkalangan pelajar di universiti awam. MClass merupakan satu aplikasi mudah alihyang membolehkan capaian akses cepat kepada Internet dari peranti mudah alihkepada kandungan kursus. Konsep MClass mirip kepada Sistem PengurusanPembelajaran (LMS) namun ia merupakan satu aplikasi yang perlu dimuat turun darisistem operasi Android secara atas talian. Antara kategori maklumat yangditawarkan menerusi MCIass adalah pengumuman, bahan kursus, forum, kuiz at astalian, gred peperiksaan serta senarai pelajar,Kajian berpandukan Teori Bersepadu Penerimaan dan Penggunaan Teknologi(UTAUT) yang melibatkan pemboleh ubah seperti jangkaan usaha, jangkaanprestasi, pengaruh sosial, kondisi pemudahcara, hasrat periakuan, tingkah lakupenggunaan serta keterlibatan. Kajian korelasi dengan menggunakan soal selidikbagi tujuan pengumpulan data. Seramai 299 orang pelajar Ijazah Sarjana Muda Pendidikan (lSMP) di Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris yang mengambil kursusPengurusan Pembelajaran dan mendaftar sebagai pengguna MClass telah dipilihsecara rawak. Data di analisis menggunakan Model Persamaan Berstruktur (SEM)menggunakan perisian AMOS bagi melaksanakan Analisis Faktor Penerokaan(EFA) dan Analisis Pengesahan Faktor (CFA).Hasil ujian model struktural menunjukkan lima daripada enam hipotesis kesanlangsung adalah signifikan iaitu; a) jangkaan prestasi memberi kesan kepada hasratperlakuan (?=.723, p 2017 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5397 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5397 text zsm closedAccess Doctoral Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Pembangunan Manusia Abachi, H. R., & Muhammad, G. (2014). The impact of m-Iearning technology onstudents and educators. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 491-496.doi: 1 0.1 016/j.chb.2013.06.018Abu-Al-Aish, A (2014). Toward mobile learning deployment in higher education.BruneI University, London.Abu-Al-Aish, A., & Love, S. (2013). Factors Influencing Students' Acceptance ofM-Learning: An Investigation in Higher Education. The International ReviewofResearch in Open and Distance Learning, 14(5), 82-107.Abu-AI-Aish, A, Love, S., & Hunaiti, Z. (2012). Mathematics students' readinessfor mobile learning. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning,4(4), 1-20. Dicapai pada 15 Oktober 2015 dari http://services.igiglobal.comlresolvedoilresolve.aspx?doi= 1 0.40 18/jmb1.20121 00 1 0 1Ahmad Mahzan Ayob. (1982). Kaedah penyelidikan sosioekonomi. Kuala Lumpur:Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.Ahmad Sobri Hashim, & Wan Fatimah Wan Ahmad. (2011). A study on genericconceptual framework for customized mobile learning management system(CMLMS). 2011 IEEE International Conference on Control System,Computing and Engineering, 321-326.Ain, N., Kaur, K., & Waheed, M. (2015). The influence oflearning value on learningmanagement system use: An extension ofUTAUT2. Information Development,1 - 16.Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior andHuman Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. Dicapai pada 5 April 2013 darihttp://linkinghub.elsevier.comiretrieve/piil074959789190020TAjzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting socialbehavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Al-Fahad, F. N. (2009). Students ' attitudes and perceptions towards theeffectiveness of mobile learning in King Saud University, Saudi Arabia. TheTurkish Online Journal ofEducational Technology - TOJET, 8(2), 111-119.Al-hujran, 0., Al-lozi, E., & Al-debei, M. M. (2014). "Get ?eady.to m?bile learning":Examining factors affecting college students' behavioral mt?n?lOns.to use mLearningin Saudi Arabia. Jordan Journal of Business Administration, 10(1),111-128.Ali, A (2013). A Framework For Measuring The Usability Issues and Criteria ofMobileLearning Applications. Western University, London.Almatari, A. Y, Iahad, N. A., & Balaid, A. S. (2013). Factors influencing students'intention to use m-learning, Journal of Information Systems Research andInnovation, 5, 1-8.Alrnrashdeh, I. A, Sahari, N., Zin, N. AM., & Alsmadi, M. (2011). DistanceLearning Management System requirements from students's perspective.Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 17-27.Al-Qeisi, K. I. (2009). Analyzing the use of UTAUT model in explaining an onlinebehaviour: Internet banking adoption. Universiti BruneI.Alwahaishi, S., & Snasel, V. (2013). Consumers ' Acceptance and Use ofInformation and Communications Technology: A UT AUT and Flow BasedTheoretical ModeL Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 8(2),61-73.Anandarajan, M., Simmers, C., Igbaria, M., Anandarajan, M., Simmers, c., &Igbaria, M. (2010). An exploratory investigation of the antecedents and impactof internet usage: An individual perspective An exploratory investigation oftheantecedents and impact of internet usage: an individual perspective. Behaviour& Information Technology, J9(69-85).Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to research in education.(W. C. Learning, Ed.) (Edisi ke 8.). Canada: Wadsworth Cangage Learning.Attewell, 1. (2005). Mobile technologies and learning. United Kingdom: Learningand Skills Development Agency.Azizi Yahya, Shahrin Hashim, Jamaludin Ramli, Yusof Boon, & Abdul RahimHamdan. (2007). Menguasai penyelidikan dalam pendidikan. Batu Caves: PTSPublication.Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y (2012). Specification, evaluation, and interpretation ofstructural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,40(1),8-34.Bandura, A (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. AmericanPsychologist, 37,122-147.Bandura, A (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitivetheory. : Prentice-Hall. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice HalLBannon,.L. (2005). A h?man-centred perspective on interaction design. InAPlfhonen, H.Isomakl, C.Roast, & P.Saariluoma (Eds.), Future InteractionDesign (pp. 9-30). Berlin, Germany: Springer.Barker, A, Krull, G., & Mallinson, B. (2005). A proposed theoretical model for mLearningadoption in developing countries. In Proceedings of the 4th WorldConference on mLearning, mLearn 2005. Cape Town, South Africa.Beckma?, E. ?. (2010). Learners on the move: mobile modalities in developmentstudies. Dzstance Education, 31(2), 159-173.Bhattcherjee, A (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: Anexpectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3),351-370.Brown, H. T. (2005). Towards a model for MLearning. International Journal on ELearning,4(3), 299-315.Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS basic concepts.applications. and programming (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Cabanban, C. L. G. (2013). Development of mobile learning using Android platform.International Journal of Information Technology & Computer Science(IJITCS), 9(1), 98-106.Canalys. (2013). Top iOS and Android apps largely absent on Windows Phone andBlackBerry 10. Dicapai pada 20 Jun 2016 darihttp://www.canalys.cominewsroomitop- ios-and-android-apps-largely-absentwindows-phone-and-blackberry-10Cheon, J., Lee, S., Crooks, S. M., & Song, J. (2012). An investigation of mobilelearning readiness in higher education based on the theory ofplanned behavior.Computers & Education, 59(3), 1054-1064.Chou, C. C, Block, L., & Jesness, R (2012). A case study of mobile learning pilotproject in K-12 schools. Journal ofEducational Technology Development andExchange, 5(2), 11-26.Cobcroft, R, Towers, S., Smith, J., & Bruns, A (2006). Mobile lea?in? in. review:Opportunities and challenges for learners, teachers, and mstItutlOns. InProceedings Online Learning and Teaching (OLT) Conference (pp. 21-30).Cohen, R. J., & Swerdlik, M. E. (2002). Psychological testing and assessme?t: Anintroduction to tests and measurements (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Coolican, H. (2004). Research methods and statistics in psychology (4th ed.).London: Hodder and Stoughton.Corbeil, J. R., & Valdes-corbeil, M. E. (2007). Are you ready for mobile learning?Educause Quarterly, 30(2), 51-58.Corlett, D., Sharples, M., Bull, S., & Chan, T. (2005). Evaluation of a mobilelearning organiser for university students. Journal of Computer AssistedLearning, 21(3),162-170.Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluatingquantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson.Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance ofInformation Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3),319-340.Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsicmotivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied SocialPsychology, 22(14), 1111-1132.Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. Plenum: Plenum.Donaldson, R. L. (2011). Student Acceptance ofMobile Learning. The Florida StateUniversity.Drakhshan, N. (2012). Student and faculty perceptions of the features of MobileLearning Management Systems in the context of higher education. OklahomaState University.Educause. (2010). 7 things you know about mobile apps for learning. Dicapai dari 4Julai 2013 dari http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pd,ELI7060.pdfEl-hussein, M. O. M., & Cronje, J. C. (2010). Defining mobile learning in the highereducation landscape research method. Educational Technology & Society,13(1),12-21.Ferreira, J. B., Klein, A Z., Freitas, A, & Schlemmer, E. (2013). Mobile learning:Defmition, uses and challenges. In L. A Wankel & P. Blessinger (Eds.),Increasing student engagement and retention using mobile applications:Smartphones, skype and texting technologies (Vol. 6, pp. 47-82). EmeraldGroup Publishing Limited.Fidani, A, & Idrizi, F. (2012). Investigating Students' Acceptance of a LearningManagement System in University Education: A Structural Equation ModelingApproach, 311-320.Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: Anintroduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley Pub.Fornell, C., & Larker: D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models withunobservable vanable sand measurement error. Journal ofMarketin R . h18(1),39-50.g esearcn,Fozdar, B. L, & Kumar, L. S. (2007). Mobile learning and student retention.International Journal ofResearch in Open and Distance Learning, 8(2), 1-18.Fraenkel, J., Wallen, N., & Hyun, H. (2015). How to design and evaluate researchin education. New York: McGraw-HilLGarson, G. D. (2012). Testing statistical assumptions (2012th ed.). North Carolina:Statistical Associate Publishing.Gaskin, C. J., & Happell, B. (2014). On exploratory factor analysis: a review ofrecent evidence, an assessment of current practice, and recommendations forfuture use. International Journal ofNursing Studies, 51(3), 511-521.Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. W. (2012). Educational research:Competencies for analysis and applications (lOth ed.). New York: PrenticeHalLGedik, N., Hanci-Karademirci, A., Kursun, E., & Cagiltay, K. (2012). Keyinstructional design issues in a cellular phone-based mobile learning project.Computers & Education, 58(4),1149-1159.Georgiev, T., Georgieva, E., & Smrikarov, A. (2004). M-learning - A new stage ofE-Learning. In International Conference on Computer Systems andTechnologies - CompSysTech '2004 M-Learning (pp. 1-5). Rousse, Bulgaria.Georgieva, E., Smrikarov, A., & Georgiev, T. (2005). A general classification ofmobile learning systems. In International Conference on Computer Systemsand Technologies. Varna, Bulgaria.Ghazizadeh, S. (2012). Acceptance theory on mobile services and applications.University of Applied Sciences.Goswarni A & Dutta S (2016) Gender differences in technology usage - A,., ,. . 51literature review. Open Journal ofBusiness and Management, 4(January), -59.Gupta, B., & Koo, Y. (2010). Applications of mobile learning in higher edu?ati?n:An empirical study. International Journal ofInformation and CommunzcatlO?Technology Education, 6(3), 75-87. Dicapai pada 2 Jun 2014 danhttp://services.igi globaLcorn!resolvedoilresolve.aspx?Hafizul Fahri Hanafi, & Khairulanuar Samsudin. (2012). M?bile le.am?genvironment system ( MLES ): The case of Android-based [earning applIcattonon undergraduates ' learning. International Journal of Advanced ComputerScience and Applications, 3(3), 1-5.Hair, J. F., Black, B., Babin, B., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2010).Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective. New Jersey, USA: PearsonEducation Inc.Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate DataAnalysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Hamdan, A, Rosseni Din, & Siti Zuraida Abdul Manaf (2012). Penerimaan mPembelajarandalam Sistem Pendidikan di Malaysia melalui The UnifiedTheory of Acceptance and Use of Technology ( UTAUT ): Satu AnalisisLiteratur. In International Conference on Mobil Learning, Applications, andServices (mobilcase2012) (pp. 93-97). Melaka.Harrington, D. (2009). Confirmatoryfactor analysis. New York: Oxford UniversityPress.Harsono, L. D., & Suryana, L. A (2014). Factors affecting the use behavior of socialmedia using UTAUT 2 Model. In Asia-Pacific Conference on Global Business,Economics, Finance and Social Sciences (pp. 1-3). Singapura.Hayati, A, Jalilifar, A, & Mashhadi, A (2013). Using Short Message Service (SMS)to teach English idioms to EFL students. British Journal of EducationalTechnology, 44(1).Hoon, Y., Kim, D. J., & Wachter, K. (2013). A study of mobile user engagement (MoEN ): Engagement motivations , perceived value , satisfaction , andcontinued engagement intention. Decision Support Systems, 56, 361-370.Hsu, H. (2012). The acceptance of Moodie : An empirical study based on UTAUT.Creative Education, 3,44-46.Hwang, G.-J., & Tsai, Ci-C, (2011). Research trends in mobile and ubiquitouslearning: a review of publications in selected journals from 2001 to 2010.British Journal ofEducational Technology, 42(4), 65-70.IDC. (2017). Smartphone OS Market Share, 2017 Ql. Dicapaipada 24 Oktober 2017dari https:llwww.idc.com!promo/smartphone-market-share/osInternet World Stats. (2017). Internet usage in Asia - Internet users, Facebooksubscribers & population statistics for 35 countries and regions in Asia.Retrieved from http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats3.htm#asiaIqbal, A, & Yaqub, N. (2010). Mobile Learning Effectiveness in Higher Education.Tesis Sarjana Muda tidak bercetak. Universiti Linnaaeus.Iqbal, S., & .Qureshi, I. A. (2012). M-Learning adoption: A perspective from adevelopmg country. The International Review of Research in Open andDistance Learning, 3(3), 147-164.Ismail, r., N??baya, S., & Gunasegaran, T. (2016). Mobile learning in MalaysianUniversities : Are students ready?, 10(3), 17-23.Jairak, K.? Pranee?olgrang, ?., & Mekhabunchakij, K. (2009). An Acceptance ofMobile Learnmg for HIgher Education Students in Thailand. In The SixthInternational Conference on eLearningfor Knowledge-Based Society (pp. 17-18). Thailand.Jambulingam, M. (2013). Behavioural Intention to Adopt Mobile Technologyamong Tertiary Students, 22(9), 1262-1271.Jaradat, M.-I. R. M., & Al Rababaa, M. S. (2013). Assessing key factor that influenceon the acceptance of mobile commerce based on modified UTAUT.International Journal ofBusiness and Management, 8(23), 102-112.Jeng, Y., Wu, T., Huang, Y., Tan, Q., & Yang, S. J. H. (2010). The add-on impactof mobile applications in learning strategies: A review study. EducationalTechnology & Society, 13(3), 3-11Kalloo, v., & Mohan, P. (2011). Correlation between Student Performance and Useof an mLearning Application for High School Mathematics. 2011 IEEE 11thInternational Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, 174-178.Kamaruzaman, M.. , & ZainoI, L . (2012). Behavior response among secondaryschool students development towards mobile learning application. In IEEEColloquium on Humanities, Science & Engineering Research (CHUSER) (pp.589-592). Kota Kinabalu, Sabah.Kambourakis, G., & Kontoni, D. P. N. (2004). Introducing attribute certificates tosecure distributed e-learning or rn-Iearning services. In Proceedings of thelASTED International Conference (pp. 436-440). Innsbruck, Austria.Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2015). Pelan Pembangunan PendidikanMalaysia 2015-2025 (Pendidikan Tinggi). Putrajaya: Kementerian PendidikanMalaysia.Khaddage, F., Lanham, E., & Zhou, W. (2009). A mobile learning model foruniversities -Reblending the current learning environment. InternationalJournal ofInteractive Mobile Technologies, 3(1),18-23.Khaddase, F., Lanham, E., & Zhow, W. (2009). A mobile learning model foruniversities rebelnding the current learning environment. International JournalofInteractive Mobile Technologies, 3(1), 18-23.Kim, H. W., Chan, H. C., & Chan, Y. P. (2007). A balanced thinking-feelings modelof information systems continuance. International Journal oj HumanComputerStudies, 65(6), 511-525.Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice oj structural equation modeling (3rded.). New York: Guilford Publications.Kukulska-hulme, A. (2007). Mobile Usability in Educational Contexts: What havewe learnt? International Review oj Research in Open and Distance Learning,8(2).Kukulska-hulme, A., Sharples, M., Milrad, M., Arnedillo-Sanchez, I., & Vavoula,G. (2011). The genesis and development of mobile learning in Europe. DalamD. Parsons (Ed.), Combining e-learning and m-learning: New applications ojblended educational resources (pp. 151-176). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.Kukulska-hulme, A., & Shield, L. (2007). An OverviewoJMobileAssisted LanguageLearning: Can mobile devices support collahorative practice in speaking andlistening? (pp. 1-20). United Kingdom.Lam, P., Wong, K., Cheng, R., Ho, E., & Yuen, S. (2011). Changes in student mobilelearning readiness - Comparison of survey data collected over a nine-monthperiod. In Proceedings oj Global Learn 2011 (pp. 180-189). Melbourne,Australia.Lee, H. S., Kim, T. G., & Choi, J. Y. (2012). A Study on the factors affecting smartphone application acceptance. International ConJerence on E-Education, EBusiness,E-Management and E-Learning, 27, 27-34.Lee, Y. E., & Benbasat, I. (2004). A framework for the study of customer interfacedesign for mobile commerce. International Journal oj Electronic Commerce,8(3),79-102.Liew, B. Y. T., Kang, M., Yoo, E., & You, J. (2013). Investigating the determinantsof mobile learning acceptance in Korea. In Jan Herrington et al. (Ed.),Proceedings oj World ConJerence on Educational Multimedia, Hypermediaand Telecommunications 2013 (pp. 1424-1430). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.Lionbridge. (2012). Mobile web apps vs. mobile native apps : How to make the rightchoice. Dicapai pada 15 Januari 2014 dariwww.lionbridge.com!files/20 121 l l/Lionbridge-WP_ MobileApps2.pdfLiu, L., Chang, C., Huang, H.-C., & Chang, Y.-L. (2016). Verification of socialnetwork site use behavior of the University Physical Education Students.EURASIA Journal oj Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(7),793-805.Lowenthal,. 1. ?. (2?10). Us?g mobile learning: Determinants behavioural intention. impacting American Journal of Distance Education 24(4) 195-206. ' ,Mahizer Hamzah. (2007). Keberkesanan penggunaan perbincangan atas talian dalamportal ?yGuru 2 terhadap pembelajaran di UPSI. 1st International MalaysianEducational Technology Convention, 242-247.Marchewka, 1. T., Liu, C., & Kostiwa, K. (2007). An Application of the UTAUTmodel for understanding student perceptions using course managementsoftware. Communications of the lIMA, 7(2),93-104.Margaryan, A, Littlejohn, A, & Vojt, G. (2011). Are digital natives a myth orreality? University students 'use of digital technologies. Computers &Education, 56(2), 429-440.Martin, F., & Ertzberger, 1. (2013). Here and now mobile learning: An experimentalstudy on the use of mobile technology. Computers & Education, 68, 76-85.Martin, R. (2011). M-learning and student engagement: Factors that support students' engagement in m-learning.Mehdipour, Y., & Zerehkafi, H. (2013). Mobile Learning for Education: Benefitsand Challenges. International Journal of Computational EngineeringResearche, 3(6), 93-101.Meladinovic, 1., & Xiang, H. (2016). A study on factors affecting the behavioralintention to use mobile shoppingfashion apps in Sweden. lonkoping University.Mitra, A, Lenzmeier, S., Steffensmeier, T., Avon, R., Qu, N., & Hazen, M. (2000).Gender and computer use in an Academic Institution. Journal of EducationalComputing Research, 23(1),67-84.Mobile Marketing Association. (2008). Mobile Applications. Dicapai pada 15lanuari 2014 dari https:/Iwww.mmaglobal.comlfiles/mobileapplications.pdfMohamad, M., & Woollard, 1. (2009). Bringing change in secondary schools: canmobile learning via mobile phones be implemented in malaysia? lnternatioanalConference on e-Learning. United Kingdom.Mohamad, M., & Woollard, 1. (2012). Mobile learning via mobile phon?s inMalaysian secondary schools: Seven signs ofpromises. Th? 8 th InternationalScientific Conference eLearning and software for Education (pp. 218-223).Bucharest, Romania.Mohd Majid Konting. (2009). Kaedah Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur:Dewan Bahasa dan PustakaMotiwalla, L. F. (2007). Mobile learning: A framework and evaluation. Computers& Education, 49(3), 581-596.Mtebe, J. S. (2014). Acceptance and use ofeLearning solutions in higher educationin East Africa. University of Tampere.Naismith, L., Lonsdale, P., Vavoula, G., & Sharples, M. (2004). Literature review inmobile technologies and learning. Futurelab Series, University ofBirmingham.Dicapai pada 23 Disember 2013 http://archive.futurelab.org.uk1Nassuora, A. B. (2013). Students acceptance of mobile learning for higher educationin Saudi Arabia. International Journal ofLearning Management Systems, 1(1),1-9.Nik Mastura Nik Mohammad, Mohd Nor Mamat, & Posiah Mohd Isa. (2012). Mlearningin Malaysia: Challenges and Strategies. Procedia - Social andBehavioral Sciences, 67, 393-401.Nor Fadzleen Sa'don, Halina Mohamad Dahlan, & Abdelrahman Ibrahim. (2014).Usage of Mobile Learning in Malaysian Secondary Education: Stakeholders'View. Journal ofInformation Systems Research and Innovation, 6,42-50.Noraini Idris. (2013). Penyelidikan dalam pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: McGrawHill.Nunnally, 1. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory (3rd ed.). New York:McGraw-Hill.Nurulhuda Salim, & Norfadzliah Mohamad Yatim Haslan Azis. (2017). Mpembelajaran:Kesediaan pelajar KKBBM terhadap era baru mediumpembelajaran. In National Innovation and Invention Competition ThroughExhibition (iCompEx ' 17).Nyiri, K. (2002). Towards a Philosophy of M-Learning. In IEEE InternationalWorkshop on Wireless and Mohile Technologies in Education (WMTE '02) (pp.17-20). Teleborg Campus, Vaxjo University, Vaxjo, Sweden.O'Brien, H. L., & Toms, E. G. (2010). The development and evaluation ofa surveyto measure user engagement. Journal of the American SOCietyfor InformationScience & Technology, 61(1), 50-69.O'Brien, H. (2016). Translating theory into methodological practice. In O. H. & C.P. (Eds.), Why Engagement Matters. Springer.O'Brien, H., & Cairns, P. (2015). An empirical evaluation of the User EngagementScale ( UES ) in online news environments. Information Processing andManagement, 51(4),413-427.O'Brien, H. L., & Toms, E. G. (2008). What is user engagement? A conceptualframework for defming user engagement with technology. Journal of theAmerican Societyfor Information Science & Technology, 59(6), 938-955'.O'Brien, H. L., & Toms, E. G. (2013). Examining the generalizability of the UserEngagement Scale (UES) in exploratory search. Information Processing andManagement, 49, 1092-1107.OnGuardOnline.gov. (2011). Understanding mobile apps: Questions & answers.Dicapai pada 15 Januari 2014 darihttp://www.onguardonline.gov/articles/Of) 18 -understanding-mo bile-appsOoms, A, Linsey, T., Webb, M., & Panayiotidis, A. (2008). The in-classroom useof mobile technologies to support diagnostic and formative assessment andfeedback. In Proceedings of the 7th London International Scholarship ofTeaching and Learning Conference. London.Park, J. S., Han, P., & Kang, B. G. (2009). A study on the acceptance for mobileapplications(App Store). The Korea Society of Management InformationSystems, 160-164.Park, 1., Yang, S., & Lehto, X. (2007) Adoption of mobile technologies for chineseconsumers. Journal ofElectronic Commerce Research, 8(3),196-206.Park, S. Y, Nam, M.-W., & Cha, S.-B. (2011). University students' behavioralintention to use mobile learning: Evaluating the technology acceptance model.British Journal ofEducational Technology, 43(4),592-605.Parsons, 1., & Taylor, L. (2011). Student engagement: What do we know and whatshould we do? Canada: University of Alberta.Pechenkina, E., Laurence, D., Oates, G., Eldridge, D., & Hunter, D. (2017). Using agamified mobile app to increase student engagement, retention and academicachievement. International Journal of Educational Technology in HigherEducation, 14(31).Pedhazur, E. 1. (1997). Multiple regression in behavioral research (3rd ed.).Orlando, FL: Wadsworth.Pedro, F. (2006). New millennium learners: Challenging our views on ICT andlearning. Paris: OECD-CERl.Pilar, R.-A, Jorge, A, & Cristina, C. (2013). The use of current mobile learningapplications in EFL. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103, 1189-1196.Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of methodbias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it.Annual Review ofPsychology, 63,539-69.Pollara, P. (2011). Mobile learning in higher education: A glimpse and a comparisonof student and faculty readiness, attitudes and perceptions. Neurosurgery.Louisiana State University. Dicapai pada 15 Disember 2014 darihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedl17690829Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants, Part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5),1-6.Qureshi, M. R. 1. (2013). IMS-Based mobile learning system. Life Science Journal,10(4),2121-2126.Radloff, A, & Coates, H. (2010). Doing morefor learning: Enhancing engagementand outcomes: Australasian Survey (?f Student Engagement : AustralasianStudent Engagement Doing more for learning: Enhancing engagement andoutcomes. Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER), Camberwell.Ramayah, T. (2005). Course Website Usage among Distance Learning BusinessStudents: The Role of Prior Experience. International Journal ofLearning, 11,1507-1517.Revels, 1., Tojib, D., & Tsarenko, Y. (2010). Understanding consumer intention touse mobile services. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 18(2), 74-80.Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of innovations. New York: The Free Press.Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion ofInnovations (4th ed.). New York: The Free Press.Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion ofInnovations (5th ed.). New York: The Free Press.Rushby, N. (2011). Editorial: Trends in learning technologies. British Journal ofEducational Technology, 42(6), 885-888.Saedah Siraj, Fadzilah Siraj, & Muhammad Helmi Norman. (2012). mLearning: Anew dimension of curriculum advancement. Kuala Lumpur: University ofMalaya Press.Sahin, I. (2006). Detailed review of roger's diffusion of innovations theory andeducational technology-related studies based on roger's. The Turkish OnlineJournal ofEducational Technology - TOJET, 5(2), 14-23.Samsiah Bidin, & Azidah Abu Ziden. (2013). Adoption and Application of MobileLearning in the Education Industry. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,90, 720-729.Saunders, M., Lewis, P., '!'- Th?rnhill, A. (2009). Research methods for businessstudents. Harlow, United Kmgdom: Financial Times Prentice Hall.Sekaran, U. (2003). Researc? methods for business a skill-building approach (4thed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Shanmugapri?a, .M., & T?larasi, A. (2011). Designing an m-Iearning application for a ubiquitous learnmg environment in the Android based mobile devicesusing web services. Indian Journal ofComputer Science and Engineering 2(1)22-30. ' ,Shao, Y, Crook, c., & Kolevas, B. (2007). Designing a mobile group blog to supportcultural learning. In Mlearn2007 (pp. 211-215). Melbourne, Australia.Sharples, M. (2006). Big issues in mobile learning. In Kaleidoscope Network ofExcellence Mobile Learning Initiative. Universiti of Nottingham.Shepherd, I. L, & Reeves, B. (2011). iPad or iFad- The reality of a paperlessclassroom. In Mobility Conference (pp. 1-26). United States: Abilene ChristianUniversity.Sheppard, B. H., Hartwick, r, & Warshaw R., P. (1988). The theory of reasonedaction: A meta-analysis of past research with recommendations formodifications and future research. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 325-343.Shi, W. (2009). An empirical research on users' acceptance of smart phone onlineapplication software. In International Conference on Electronic Commerce andBusiness Intelligence, ECBI2009Shorfuzzaman, M., & Alhussein, M. (2016). Modeling learners' readiness to adoptmobile learning: A perspective from a GCC Higher Education Institution.Mobile Information Systems, 2016Sidek Mohd Noah. (2005). Pengujian dan penilaian dalam kaunseling. Serdang:Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia.Singh, Devinder, & Zaitun Abu Bakar. (2006). Mobile Learning In WirelessClassrooms. Malaysian Online Journal ofInstructional Technology (MOJET),3(2), 26--42.Sirat, M., & Kaur, S. (2010). Changing state-university relations: The experience ofJapan and lesson for Malaysia. Comparative Education, 46(2), 189-205.Stevens, D., & Kitchenham, A. (2011). An analysis of mobile learning in ?d?cation,business and medicine. In A. Kitchenham (Ed.), Models for InterdisciplinaryMobile Learning: Delivering Information to Students. IGI Global.Suruhanjaya Komunikasi dan Multimedia Malaysia. (2014). Hand Phone UsersSurvey 2014. Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commision.Suruhanjaya Komunikasi dan Multimedia Malaysia. (2016). Communictions andmultimedia- Pocket book of statistics. Malaysian Communications andMultimedia Commision.Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics (Edisi ke 6.).Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Taiwo, A A, & Downe, A G. (2013). The theory of user acceptance and use oftechnology (Utaut ): A meta-analytic review of empirical fmdings. Journal ofTheoretical and Applied Information Technology, 49(1), 48-58.Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up digital: The rise of the net generation. New York:McGraw-Hill.Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A (1995). Assessing IT usage: The role of prior experience.MIS Quarterly, 19(4), 561-570.Thomas, T. D., Singh, L., & Gaffar, K. (2013). The utility of the UTAUT model inexplaining mobile learning adoption in higher education in Guyana.International Journal of Education and Development Using Information andCommunication Technology (IJEDICT), 9(3), 71-85.Thompson, R.. , Higgins, C. ., & Howell, 1 .. (1991). Personal computing toward aconceptual Model of Utilization. MIS Quarterly, 124-143.Traxler, 1. (2005). Defming mobile learning. In IADIS International ConferenceMobile Learning (pp. 261-266).Ugur, N. G., Koc, T., & Koc, M. (2016). An analysis of mobile learning acceptanceby college students. Journal ofEducational and Instructional Studies, 6(2), 39-49.UNESCO. (2012). Turning on Mobile Learning in Latin America. Paris.UPSI. (2015). Dasar e-pembelajaran Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris (pp. 1-16).Tanjung Malim.Vavoula, G., Pachler, N., & Kukulska-Hulme, A (2009). Researching mobilelearning: Frameworks, tools, and research designs. New York: Peter Lang.Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a ResearchAgenda on Interventions., 39 (2), 273-312. Decision Science, 39(2), 273-312.Venkate.sh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptanceof information technology: Toward unified view. MIS Quarterly 27(3) 425-478.' ,Venk.atesh, V:, Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, x. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use ofinformation technology: Extending the Unified Theory. MIS Quarterly, 36(1)157-178.'Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2016). Unified Theory of Acceptance andUse ofTechnologu: A synthesis and the road ahead. Forthcoming in Journal ofthe Associationfor Information Sytems, 17(5), 328-376.Wachter, K., Kim, Y. H., & Kim, M. (2012). Mobile users: Choosing to engage.International Journal ofSales, Retailing and Marketing, 1 (1), 3-13.Wang, X., Goh, D. H.-L., Lim, E.-P., Vu, A. W. L., & Chua, A. Y. K. (2017).Examining the effectiveness of gamification in human computation.International Journal ofHuman Computer Interaction, 33(10).Wang, Y-S., Wu, M.-C., & Wang, H.-Y (2009). Investigating the determinants andage and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning. British Journalof Educational Technology, 40(1), 92-118. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.wiley.comll0.llll/j.1467-8535.2007.00809.xWe Are Social, & Hootsuite. (2017). 2017 Digital yearbook: Internet, Social mediaand mobile data for 239 countries around the world. Dicapai pada 25 Oktober2017 https://wearesocial.comluklspecial-reports/2017-digital-yearbookWest, D. M. (2013). Mobile Learning: Transforming Education, Engaging Students,and Improving Outcomes. In Mobile Learning: Transforming Education andEngaging Students and Teachers. Brookings: Center for TechnologyInnovation.Wiersma, W. (2009). Research methods in education (9th ed.). New Jersey, USA:Pearson Education.Wilkinson, K., & Barter, P. (2016). Do mobile learning devices enhance learning inhigher education anatomy classrooms? Journal of Pedagogic Development,6(1), 14-23.Winters, N. (2006). What is mobile learning? In M. Sharples (Ed.), Big issues inmobile learning: Report of a workshop by the Kaleidoscope N_etwo.rk ofExcellence Mobile Learning Initiative (pp. 5-9). New York: University ofNottingham.Wong, C. Y., Khong, C. W., & Chu, K. (2012). Inter?ace de?ign practice .andeducation towards mobile apps development. Procedia - SOCIal and BehavioralSciences, 51, 698-702. Dicapai pada 5 Jun 2015 darihttp://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/piilS1877042812033654Wu, M. (2016). An Examination of Mobile Application Use Intention through theUnified Theory of Acceptance and Use Technology Model. The Journal ofInternational Management Studies, 11(1),110-121.Wu, Y., Tao, Y., & Yang, P. (2007). Using UTAUT to explore the behavior of3Gmobile communication users. In 2007 IEEE International Conference onIndustrial Engineering and Engineering Management (pp. 199-203).XU, Q. (2015). Examining user engagement attributes in visual information search.In iConference 2015 Examining.Yi, M. Y., Jackson, l D., Park, l S., & Probst, l C. (2006). Understandinginformation technology acceptance by individual professionals: Toward anintegrative view. Information & Management, 43,350-363.Zaefarian, G., Henneberg, S. C., & Naude, P. (2013). Assessing the strategic fitbetween business strategies and business relationships in knowledge-intensivebusiness services. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(2), 260-272.Zainudin Awang. (2012). A Handbook on SEM (Structural Equation Modeling)using AMOS graphic. Kota Bharu, Kelantan: Universiti Teknologi MARA.Zainudin Awang. (2015). SEM made simple, a gentle approach to learningStructural Equation Modelling. Selangor: MPWS Rich Publication.Zamfrroiu, A. (2013). Interaction in a mobile learning system. In The 9 thInternational Scientific Conference eLearning and softwarefor Education (pp.219-225). Bucharest, Romania.Zhou, T. (2011). Understanding mobile Internet continuance usage from theperspectives ofUTAUT and flow. Information Development, 27(3), 207-218.Zikmund, W. G., & Babin, B. (2007). Essentials of marketing research. Australia:Thomson South-Western.Zikmund, W. G., Babin, B. r., Carr, l C., & Griffin, M. (2013). Business ResearchMethods (9th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Zoraini Wati Abas, Chng Loi Peng, & Norziati Mansor. (2009). A study on learnerreadiness for mobile learning at Open University Malaysia. In IADISInternational Conference Mobile Learning (pp. 151-157).Zuraini Zakaria, Fatimah Hassan, Hasmawati Hassan, & Noresah Mohd Shariff(2006). Cabaran pendidikan secara jarak jauh: Kesedaran dan pendedahandalam era teknologi maklumat dan komunikasi (lCT).

Faktor penentu penerimaan,penggunaan dan keterlibatan aplikasi mudah alih 'Mclass' dalam kalangan pelajar universiti awam, Malaysia

Similar Items