Pembinaan dan validasi rubrik pentaksiran kendiri kemahiran insaniah, E-Persona

Kajian ini bertujuan membina dan menentusahkan rubrik pentaksiran kendiri kemahiran insaniah,e-persona. Kajian ini mengadaptasi reka bentuk Design and Developmental Research (DDR) oleh Richeydan Klein melibatkan empat fasa iaitu kajian keperluan, rekabentuk, pembinaan dan penilaian. Tigarubrik iaitu...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Azliza Muhammad
Format:	thesis
Language:	zsm
Published:	2019
Subjects:	LB Theory and practice of education
Online Access:	https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5440
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:5440
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
collection	UPSI Digital Repository
language	zsm
topic	LB Theory and practice of education
spellingShingle	LB Theory and practice of education Azliza Muhammad Pembinaan dan validasi rubrik pentaksiran kendiri kemahiran insaniah, E-Persona
description	Kajian ini bertujuan membina dan menentusahkan rubrik pentaksiran kendiri kemahiran insaniah,e-persona. Kajian ini mengadaptasi reka bentuk Design and Developmental Research (DDR) oleh Richeydan Klein melibatkan empat fasa iaitu kajian keperluan, rekabentuk, pembinaan dan penilaian. Tigarubrik iaitu Rubrik Mendengar dengan Aktif dan Memberi Maklumbalas (KOM2), Mencari Idea dan Mencari Penyelesaian Alternatif (BKMM3) serta Menganalisis dan Membuat Keputusanberkaitan dengan Etika (EM2) telah dibina. Sampel kajian melibatkan 342 orang pelajarKursus Pembangunan Sahsiah di Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris yang dipilih berdasarkan kaedah pensampelan rawak berstrata berkadaran. Kesahan konstruk dan kebolehpercayaanrubrik ditentukan menggunakan Model Pengukuran Rasch. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan bahawa rubrik yangdibangunkan mempunyai kesahan konstruk yang baik seperti yang ditunjukkan oleh nilai polariti item(PTMEA Corr), fit statistics dan peta dimensionaliti. Kesemua nilai PTMEA Corr adalah positif danmelebihi 0.3, dan nilai fit statistics dalam julat yang boleh diterima (0.6-1.4). Analisisdimensionaliti menunjukkan rubrik yang dibangunkan dapat menjelaskan 38.3% daripada varians bagiKOM2, 37.4% bagi BKMM3 dan 39.3% bagi EM2. Kebolehpercayaan rubrik bagi KOM2, BKMM3 danEM2 juga tinggi dengan nilainya masing-masing ialah 0.97, 0.93 dan 0.94 dan kebolehpercayaanindividu ialah 0.86, 0.88 dan 0.88. Nilai pengasingan bagi semua konstruk juga baik, melebihi 3.0.Kemahiran insaniah pelajar didapati lebih baik di dalam pentaksiran kali kedua.Kesimpulannya, rubrik yang dibangunkan mempunyai ciri-ciri psikometrik yang baik bagimengukur ketiga-tiga kemahiran insaniah tersebut. Penggunaan rubrik telah membantu pelajar melaksanakan pentaksiran kendiri dan menentukan sasaran sendiri. Kriteria dandeskriptor yang terdapat dalam rubrik dapat dijadikan panduan oleh pelajar dalammelaksanakan pentaksiran kendiri. Penggunaan e-persona ini telah memudahkan pentaksiran kendiridalam kalangan pelajar, serta memudahkan pengurusan rekod dan bukti-buktipentaksiran yang lebih efisien. Implikasinya, penggunaan rubrik e-persona ini boleh diperluaskankepada kursus lain untuk mengukur kemahiran insaniah yang berbeza.
format	thesis
qualification_name
qualification_level	Doctorate
author	Azliza Muhammad
author_facet	Azliza Muhammad
author_sort	Azliza Muhammad
title	Pembinaan dan validasi rubrik pentaksiran kendiri kemahiran insaniah, E-Persona
title_short	Pembinaan dan validasi rubrik pentaksiran kendiri kemahiran insaniah, E-Persona
title_full	Pembinaan dan validasi rubrik pentaksiran kendiri kemahiran insaniah, E-Persona
title_fullStr	Pembinaan dan validasi rubrik pentaksiran kendiri kemahiran insaniah, E-Persona
title_full_unstemmed	Pembinaan dan validasi rubrik pentaksiran kendiri kemahiran insaniah, E-Persona
title_sort	pembinaan dan validasi rubrik pentaksiran kendiri kemahiran insaniah, e-persona
granting_institution	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
granting_department	Fakulti Pembangunan Manusia
publishDate	2019
url	https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5440
_version_	1747833195235115008
spelling	oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:54402020-12-16 Pembinaan dan validasi rubrik pentaksiran kendiri kemahiran insaniah, E-Persona 2019 Azliza Muhammad LB Theory and practice of education Kajian ini bertujuan membina dan menentusahkan rubrik pentaksiran kendiri kemahiran insaniah,e-persona. Kajian ini mengadaptasi reka bentuk Design and Developmental Research (DDR) oleh Richeydan Klein melibatkan empat fasa iaitu kajian keperluan, rekabentuk, pembinaan dan penilaian. Tigarubrik iaitu Rubrik Mendengar dengan Aktif dan Memberi Maklumbalas (KOM2), Mencari Idea dan Mencari Penyelesaian Alternatif (BKMM3) serta Menganalisis dan Membuat Keputusanberkaitan dengan Etika (EM2) telah dibina. Sampel kajian melibatkan 342 orang pelajarKursus Pembangunan Sahsiah di Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris yang dipilih berdasarkan kaedah pensampelan rawak berstrata berkadaran. Kesahan konstruk dan kebolehpercayaanrubrik ditentukan menggunakan Model Pengukuran Rasch. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan bahawa rubrik yangdibangunkan mempunyai kesahan konstruk yang baik seperti yang ditunjukkan oleh nilai polariti item(PTMEA Corr), fit statistics dan peta dimensionaliti. Kesemua nilai PTMEA Corr adalah positif danmelebihi 0.3, dan nilai fit statistics dalam julat yang boleh diterima (0.6-1.4). Analisisdimensionaliti menunjukkan rubrik yang dibangunkan dapat menjelaskan 38.3% daripada varians bagiKOM2, 37.4% bagi BKMM3 dan 39.3% bagi EM2. Kebolehpercayaan rubrik bagi KOM2, BKMM3 danEM2 juga tinggi dengan nilainya masing-masing ialah 0.97, 0.93 dan 0.94 dan kebolehpercayaanindividu ialah 0.86, 0.88 dan 0.88. Nilai pengasingan bagi semua konstruk juga baik, melebihi 3.0.Kemahiran insaniah pelajar didapati lebih baik di dalam pentaksiran kali kedua.Kesimpulannya, rubrik yang dibangunkan mempunyai ciri-ciri psikometrik yang baik bagimengukur ketiga-tiga kemahiran insaniah tersebut. Penggunaan rubrik telah membantu pelajar melaksanakan pentaksiran kendiri dan menentukan sasaran sendiri. Kriteria dandeskriptor yang terdapat dalam rubrik dapat dijadikan panduan oleh pelajar dalammelaksanakan pentaksiran kendiri. Penggunaan e-persona ini telah memudahkan pentaksiran kendiridalam kalangan pelajar, serta memudahkan pengurusan rekod dan bukti-buktipentaksiran yang lebih efisien. Implikasinya, penggunaan rubrik e-persona ini boleh diperluaskankepada kursus lain untuk mengukur kemahiran insaniah yang berbeza. 2019 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5440 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5440 text zsm closedAccess Doctoral Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Pembangunan Manusia Abd. Rahim Abd. Rashid. (2000). Wawasan & agenda pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur:Utusan Publications & Distributors Sdn Bhd.Abdallah, T., Lansari, A., & Al-rawi, A. (2009). E-portfolio assessment system for an outcome-based information technology curriculum. Journal of Information Technology Education:Innovations in Practice, 8, 4354.Abdullah, M. N. L. Y. (2010). Self-regulated Learning. Theory and application. Pulau Pinang:Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia.Abdull Sukor Shaari. (2008). Guru berkesan petua dan panduan. Intok: UUM Press.Adams, J., & Morgan, G. (2007). Second generation e-learning: Characteristics and design principles for supporting management soft-skills development. International Journalon E-Learning, 6(2), 157185.Ahmad Amin, M. S. (2006). Membuat keputusan. Panduan aplikasi harian. Kuala Lumpur: DewanBahasa dan Pustaka.Aiken, L. R. (1996). Rating scales and checklists?: evaluating behaviour, personality andattitudes. New York: John Wiley & Sons,Inc.Ainon Mohd, & Abdullah Hassan. (1994). Teknik berfikir. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications& Distributors Sdn Bhd.Ainon Mohd, & Abdullah Hassan. (2006). Belajar berfikir (5th ed.). Kuala Lumpur: PTS ProfessionalPublishing Sdn Bhd.Akta Pendidikan 1996 (Akta 550) & Peraturan-Peraturan Terpilih. LembagaPenyelidikan Undang-Undang. Kuala Lumpur: International Law Books Services.https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2American Federation of Teachers, National Council on Measurement in Education, & NationalEducation Association. (1990). Standards for teacher competence in educational assessmentof students. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 9(4), 3032.Andrade, H. (2008). Self-assessment through rubrics. Educational Leadership, 65(4), 6063.Andrade, H., & Du, Y. (2005). Student perspectives on rubric-referenced assessment.Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10, 111.Andrade, H. G. (1997). Understanding rubrics. Educational Leadership, 54(4), 1417.Andrade, & Du, Y. (2007). Student responses to criteria-referenced self-assessment.Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(2), 159181.Andrews, J., & Higson, H. (2008). Graduate Employability, Soft Skills Versus HardBusiness Knowledge: A European Study. Higher Education in Europe, 33(4), 411422.Andrich, D. (1978). A rating formulation for ordered response categories.Psychometrika, 43(4), 561573.Anglin, L., Anglin, K., Schumann, P. L., & Kaliski, J. A. (2008). Improving theefficiency and effectiveness of grading through the use of computer-assisted gradingrubrics. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 6(1), 5173.Aslina Ahmad, Amelia Mohd. Noor, & Noraini Ismail. (2016). Kemahiran Asas Kaunseling. InAslina Ahmad (Ed.), Pembangunan sahsiah. Falsafah, konsep, Teori dan Praktis (2nd ed., pp.113136). Tanjong Malim: Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.Association of American Colleges and Universities. (2017). Integrating signatureassignments into the curriculum and inspiring design. Liberal Education & AmericansPromise. Retrieved from https://www.aacu.org/node/4392Attakorn, K., Tayut, T., Pisitthawat, K., & Kanokorn, S. (2014). Soft skills of newteachers in the secondary schools of Khon Kaen Secondary Educational Service Area 25, Thailand. InProcedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 112, pp. 10101013). Elsevier B.V.Ayre, C., & Scally, A. J. (2014). Critical values for Lawshes content validity ratio: Revisitingthe original methods of calculation. Measurement & Evaluation in Counseling & Development(Sage Publications Inc. ), 47(1), 7986.Aziz Salleh. (1993). Kaunseling Islam asas. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications &Distributors Sdn Bhd.Azliza Muhammad, Othman Lebar, Siti Eshah Mokshein, & Sadiah Baharom. (2017). E-Portfolioassessment in measuring soft skills in teacher education program?: preliminary findings.International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(6), 9911003.Azrilah Abdul Aziz, Mohd Saidfudin Masodi, & Azami Zaharim. (2013). Asas model pengukuran Rasch.Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.Azwani Masuwai, Norain Mohd Tajudin, & Noor Shah Saad. (2016). Evaluating the face and contentvalidity of a Teaching and Learning Guiding Principles Instrument (TLGPI ): Aperspective study of Malaysian teacher educators.Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 3(3), 1121.Bahagian Pembangunan Akademik dan Kualiti. (2015). Course Learning OutcomeMonitoring.Bahagian Pendidikan Guru. (2009). Standard Guru Malaysia. Putrajaya: Kementerian PelajaranMalaysia.Barrett, H. C. (2007). Researching electronic portfolios and learner engagement: The REFLECTInitiative. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 50(6), 436449.https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.50.6.2Baryla, E., Shelley, G., & Trainor, W. (2012). Transforming rubrics using factoranalysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 17(4), 17.Bassham, G., Irwin, W., Nardone, H., & Wallace, J. (2010). Critical Thinking: AStudents Introduction (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Bastiaens, T. J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2004). A Five-Dimensional Framework for AuthenticAssessment. ETR&D, 52(3), 6786.Beck, R. J., Livne, N. L., & Bear, S. L. (2005). Teachers self-assessment of the effects offormative and summative electronic portfolios on professional development. European Journal ofTeacher Education, 28(3), 221244.Becker, G. S. (1975). Human Capital. A theoritical and empirical analysis, with special referenceto education. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.Bejar, I. I. (2008). Standard setting: what is it? why is it important? R&D Connections, (7), 16.Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. HigherEducation, 32, 347364.Biggs, J. (2003). Aligning teaching for constructing learning Summary. The Higher EducationAcademy, 14. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3100776Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2015). Applying the Rasch model. Fundamental measurement inthe human sciences (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.Boston, K., & Barrett, H. (2004). E-assessment and e-portfolios. Advances.Boud, D. (1995). Enhancing learning through self assessment (1st ed.). London: Kogan Page.Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society.Studies in Continuing Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/713695728Boud, D., & Brew, A. (1995). Developing a typology for learner self-assessmentpractices. Research and Development in Higher Education, 18(January 1995),130135.Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2005). Redesigning assessment for learning beyond higher education.Research and Development in Higher Education, 28, 3441.Boulton, H. (2014). ePortfolios beyond pre-service teacher education: a new dawn? European Journal of Teacher Education, 37(3), 374389.https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2013.870994Bransford, J. D., Sherwood, R. D., & Sturdevant, T. (1984). Teaching thinking and problem solving.Technical report series 85.1.2. Tennessee.Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research inPsychology, 3(2), 77101.Broad, B. (2003). To tell the truth?: Beyond rubrics. In What we really value. University Press ofColorado.Brown, T. H. (2005). Beyond constructivism: Exploring future learning paradigms.Education Today, 1430.Bruner, J. (1986). Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. London: Harvard University Press.https://doi.org/10.2307/1773049Buyarski, C. A., & Landis, C. M. (2014). Using an ePortfolio to assess the outcomes of afirst-year seminar?: student narrative and authentic assessment. International Journal ofePortfolio, 4(1), 4960.Buzzetto-More, N. (2010). Assessing the efficacy and effectiveness of an e-portfolio used forsummative assessment. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 6, 6185.Cassidy, S. (2007). Assessing inexperienced students ability to self-assess:Exploring links with learning style and academic personal control. Assessment and Evaluation inHigher Education, 32(3), 313330.Challis, M. (1999). Portfolio-based learning and assessment in medical education. AMEEMedical Education Guide NO. 11 (revised). Medical Teacher, 21(4), 370386.Chan, S., Inoue, C., & Taylor, L. (2015). Developing rubrics to assess the reading-into- writingskills: A case study. Assessing Writing, 26, 2037.Chou, C. M. (2012). Influence of teachers perceived e-portfolio acceptance on teacher evaluation effectiveness in Taiwan. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28, 719739.Chua, Y. P. (2011). Kaedah dan Statistik Penyelidikan: Kaedah Penyelidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Mc GrawHill Education.Chuang, H. H. (2010). Weblog-based electronic portfolios for student teachers in Taiwan.Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(2), 211227.Churches, A. (2015). A guide to formative and summative assessment and rubricdevelopment. 21st Century Project.Cohen, B. H. (2013). Explaining psychological statistics (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.Company, P., Contero, M., Otey, J., Camba, J. D., Agost, M. J., & Prez-Lpez, D. (2017). Web-Basedsystem for adaptable rubrics case study on CAD assessmend. Educational Technology and Society,20(3), 2441.Coulter, S., & Lester, J. N. (2011). Finding and redefining the meaning of teaching: Exploring theexperiences of mid-career teachers. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 5(2), 526.https://doi.org/10.3776/joci.2011.v5n2p5-26Covey, S. R. (1989). The seven habits of highly effective people. New York: Simon & Schuster.Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions.Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research.Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative andQualitative Research (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson.Crisp, G. (2007). The e-assessment handbook. New York: Continuum International PublishingGroup.Curts, J. (2003). Assessment of preservice teachers web-based electronic portfolios.Education Technology for Teacher Preparation and Certification, 9298.Darling-Hammond, L., & Snyder, J. (2000). Authentic assessment of teaching in context. Teaching and Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742- 051X(00)00015-9Davies, a, & Le Mahieu, P. (1980). Assessment for Learning: Reconsidering Portfolios and ResearchEvidence By Anne Davies and Paul Le Mahieu. Innovation and Change in ProfessionalEducation: Optimising New Modes of Assessment: In Search of Qualities and Standards, (1933),141169.Daviesm, A. (Institute for the F., Fidler, D., & Gorbis, M. (2011). Future Work Skills 2020.Phoenix Usa, 14.Day, C. (2002). The challenge to be the best: Reckless curiosity and mischievousmotivation. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3), 421434.Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. (2010). Kamus Dewan (Keempat). Kuala Lumpur: DewanBahasa dan Pustaka.DiMartino, J., Castaneda, A., Brownstein, M., & Miles, S. (2010). Authenticassessment. American Book Review, 31(4), 1919.Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. EducationResearch and Perspectives, 38(1), 105123.Durowoju, E. O., & Onuka, A. O. U. (2014). Best practices and experiences in soft skills assessmentin Oyo Town, Oyo State Schools. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and PolicyStudies (JETERAPS), 5(5), 607613.Educational Reserach Service. (2004). Developing and using instructional rubrics.Edwards, N. M. (2007). Student self-grading in social statistics. College Teaching,55(2), 7276. https://doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.55.2.72-76Elengovan Varutharaju, & Nagendralingan Ratnavadivel. (2014). Enhancing higher orderthinking skills through clinical simulation. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 11,75100.Ellis, L., & Kelder, J. (2012). Individualised marks for group work?: Embedding an ePortfoliocriterion in a Criterion Referenced Assessment ( CRA ) rubric for group-work assessment. Education for Information, 29(34), 219227.https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-130935Emmett, D. (2011). Student engagement with an ePortfolio: a case study of pre-service educationstudents. Good Thesis.Eny Susiana. (2010). IDEAL Problem Solving dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Jurnal MatematikaKreatif-Inovatif, 1(2), 7382.Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016a). Comparison of convenience samplingand purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 14.https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016b). Comparison of convenience samplingand purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 14.https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11Evans, A. W., McKenna, C., & Oliver, M. (2005). Trainees perspectives on theassessment and self-assessment of surgical skills. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education,30(2), 163174. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293042000264253Fakulti Sains dan Matematik. (2013). Buku Panduan Akademik. Tanjong Malim: ains danMatematik UPSI.Faulkner, M., Syed Mahfuzul Aziz, Waye, V., & Smith, E. (2013). Exploring ways that ePortfolioscan support the progressive development of graduate qualities and professionalcompetencies. Higher Education Research & Development, 32(6), 871887.https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2013.806437Ferrara, V. M. (2010). Technology for Online Portfolio Assessment Programs. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 58(3), 184185.https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2010.511879Fleischmann, E. M. (2013). Soft skills of excellent teachers in diverse South African schools inthe Western Cape. Stellenbosch University.Fleiss, J. L. (1971). Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters.Psychological Bulletin, 76(5), 378382. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031619Fluckiger, J. (2010). Single point rubric: A tool for responsible student self-assessment. Teacher Education Faculty Publications, 5, 1825. Retrieved fromhttp://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/tedfacpub/5/Francis, R. A. (2008). An investigation into the receptivity of undergraduate students toassessment empowerment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(5), 547557.https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930701698991Fredman, N. (2014). Understanding motivation for study: Human capital or humancapability? International Journal of Training Research, 12(2), 93.Freedman, B. (1987). Scientific value and validity as ethical requirements for research: A proposedexplication. IRB: Ethics and Human Research, 9(6), 710.Fugate, M., Kinicki, A. J., & Ashforth., B. E. (2004). Employability: A psycho-social construct,its dimensions, and applications. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1, 1438.G. Lokanadha Reddy, Thankachan, T. C., & Anuradha, R. V. (2013). Effectiveness of value analysismodel of teaching in developing value processing skills among secondary school students.Indian Streams Research Journal, 3(8).Garcia-Ros, R. (2011). Analysis and validation of a rubric to assess oral presentation skills inuniversity contexts. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 9(3),10431062. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2011.570434Garfolo, B. T., Kelpsh, E. P., Phelps, Y., & Kelpsh, L. (2016). The use of courseembedded signature assignments and rubrics in programmatic assessment. Academy ofBusiness Journal, 820.Ghalib, T. K., & Al-Hattami, A. A. (2015). Holistic versus analytic evaluation of EFLwriting: A case study. English Language Teaching, 8(7), 225236.Ghazali Darusalam, & Sufean Hussin. (2016). Metodologi penyelidikan dalampendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Malaya. Retrieved fromwww.umpress.com.myGibb, J. (2004). Generic skills in vocational education and training?: Research readings. NationalCentre for Vocational Education Research (NCVER). Adelaide: National Centre for VocationalEducation Research (NCVER) Ltd.Gibson, D., & Barret, H. (2003). Directions in electronic portfolio development.Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 2(4), 559576.Gokhale, A. a. (1995). Collaborative Learning Enhances Critical Thinking. Journal of TechnologyEducation, 7, 2230. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_910Greenstein, L. (2012). Assessing 21st century skills: A guide to evaluating mastery and authenticlearning. Corwin.Griffin, P., & Care, E. (2015). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills. Method andapproach. New York: Springer.Groves, R. M., Fowler, F. J. J., Couper, M. P., Lepskowski, J. M., Singer, E., &Tourangeau, R. (2009). Survey methodology (2nd ed.). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough?An experimentwith data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 5982.https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903Guttman, L. (1950). The basis for scalogram analysis. Measurement and Prediction, 6090.Gwozdek, A. E., Springfield, E. C., & Kerschbaum, W. E. (2013). EPortfolio: Developinga catalyst for critical self-assessment and evaluation of learning outcomes. Journal ofAllied Health, 42(1), 1117.Habermas, J. (2005). Knowledge and human interests?: A general perspective. In G. Gutting (Ed.), Continental Philosophy of Science (pp. 310321). Victoria: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470755501Haladyna, T. M., & Rogriguez, M. C. (2013). Developing and validating test items.New York: Routledge.Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of EducationalResearch, 77(1), 81112.Hazilah Mohd Amin, Johari Jaafar, Zaihosnita Hood, Saidah Saad, & Hamizah Mohd Amin. (2013).Kemahiran insaniah pelajar prasiswazah: Analisis perbezaanologi, 61(1), 1925. https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v61.1677Heckman, J. J., & Kautz, T. (2012). Hard evidence on soft skills. Labor Economists,19(4), 451464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2012.05.014.Henscheid, J. M., Brown, G., Gordon, a, & Chen, H. L. (2014). Unlocking ePortfolio Practice:Teaching Beliefs. Aquat. Microb. Ecol., 4(1), 2148.Hoon, C. L. (2006). Teachers as agents of values?: Malaysian perspective. JurnalPendidikan, 5160.Hoppe, M. (2006). Active listening. Improve your ability to listen and lead. NorthCarolina: Centre for Creative Leadership.Hramiak, A., Boulton, H., & Irwin, B. (2009). Trainee teachers use of blogs as private reflectionsfor professional development. Learning, Media, and Technology, 34(3), 259269.https://doi.org/10.1080/17439880903141521Humphry, S. M., & Heldsinger, S. A. (2014). Common structural design features of rubrics mayrepresent a threat to validity. Educational Researcher, 43(5), 253 263.Imenda, S. (2014). Is there a conceptual difference between theoretical and conceptualframeworks??, 38(2), 185195.Irshad Hussain, Muhammad Javed, Siew Eng, L., & Mohammed Abdul Rashid. (2013). Reflection of Prospective Teachers on the Nature of Teaching Practice. International Online Journalof Educational Sciences, 5(3), 531538.Isbell, T., & Goomas, D. T. (2014). Computer-Assisted Rubric Evaluation: Enhancing Outcomes andAssessment Quality. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, (November 2014), 3741.J.OLaughlin, N., & T.Serra, S. (2016). Using eportfolios to deepen civic engagement.Peer Review, 3(Summer), 2932.Janssen, G., Meier, V., & Trace, J. (2015). Building a better rubric: Mixed methods rubric revision. Assessing Writing, 26(18), 5166.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2015.07.002Jerry, W. (2000). Educational research. London: Continuum.Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Stanne, M. B. (2000). Cooperative Learning Methods?:A Meta-Analysis. Methods, 1, 133.Johnson, R. S., Mims-Cox, J. S., & Doyle-Nichols, A. (2010). Developing portfolios in education. Aguide to reflection, inquiry and assessment (2nd ed.). California: Sage Publications.Jonassen, D. H. (1994). Technology as cognitive tools: Learners as designers. ITForumPaper, 1, 17.Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional Design Models for Well-Structured and Ill-Structured Problem-Solving Learning Outcomes. Educational Technology Research andDevelopment, 45(1), 6590. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299613Jonsson, A. (2014). Rubrics as a way of providing transparency in assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(7), 840852.https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.875117Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics?: reliability , validity andeducational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2(2), 130144.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002Kahirol Mohd, S., Wan Nur Hidayah, I., Nor Lisa, S., Badaruddin, I., & Mohamad Zaid,M. (2008). Kemahiran Employability Dalam Kalangan Mahasiswa Dan Pensyarah:Perbandingan Dengan Industri. Prosiding SKIKS 08, 431441.Kanjee, A., & Mthembu, J. (2015). Assessment literacy of foundation phase teachers?: An exploratorystudy. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 5(1), 142 168.Karkehabadi, S. (2013). Enhance Student Performance Why Use a Rubric?? North VirginiaCommunity College.Kearns, P. (2001). Review of research-generic skills for the new economy. SouthAustralia. Retrieved from http://www.ncver.edu.au/publications/602.htmlKechagias, K. (2011). Teaching and assessing soft skills. Neapolis: Measuring & AssessingSoft Skills Project.Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2012). Dasar pendidikan kebangsaan. Putrajaya.Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2006). Pelan Induk Pembangunan Pendidikan2006-2010.Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2015). Ringkasan Eksekutif Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan MalaysiaPengajian Tinggi 2015-2025. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Putrajaya.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi. (2006). Modul Pembangunan Kemahiran Insaniah (Soft Skills)Untuk IPT Malaysia. Serdang: Universiti Putra Malaysia.Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi. (2016). Rubrik PNGK bersepadu iCGPA. Panduan pentaksiran hasil pembelajaran. Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi Malaysia.Putrajaya: Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi.Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi. (2018). Framing Malaysian higher education 4.0. Future-prooftalents. (Jabatan Pengajian Tinggi, Ed.). Putrajaya: Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi.Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi Malaysia. (2006). Modul pembangunan kemahiran insaniah (softskills) untuk institusi pengajian tinggi Malaysia. Serdang: Universiti Putra Malaysia.Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi Malaysia. (2010). MOHE Implementation Plan for Development of Innovative Human Capital at Tertiary Level. Putrajaya: Kementerian PengajianTinggi.Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi Malaysia. (2011). DASAR e-PEMBELAJARAN NEGARA, 140.Khalid Saifullah Mazlan, Khoo, L. M. S., & Jano, Z. (2015). Designing an Eportfolio Conceptual Framework to Enhance Written Communication Skills among Undergraduate Students. Asian Social Science, 11(17), 3547. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n17p35Khoo, L. M. S. (2012). Using an eportfolio to enhance graduate attributes amongengineering students in Malaysia. Murdoch University.Khoo, L. M. S., Maor, D., & Schibeci, R. (2011). The engineering eportfolio: Enhancingcommunication, critical thinking and problem solving and teamwork skills? World Academy ofScience, Engineering and Technology, 77(5), 1027 1032.Kocoglu, Z., Akyel, A., & Ercetin, G. (2008). Pen/paper and electronic portfolios?: an effectivetool for developing reflective thinking of Turkish EFL student teachers?? Mediterranean Journal ofSocial Sciences, 13(1), 124.Kop, R., & Hill, A. (2008). Connectivism: Learning theory of the future or vestige of the past?International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning.Koraneekij, P., & Khlaisang, J. (2015). Development of e-portfolio Management Systemtowards Thai Qualifications Framework for Higher Education. Procedia - Social and BehavioralSciences, 174, 14201427.Krejcie, R. V, & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research ActivitiesRobert. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38(1), 607610.https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308Kuo, S. A. (2007). Which rubric is more suitable for NSS Liberal Studies?? Analytic or holistic??Hong Kong Educational Research Association, 22(2), 179199.Laily Fazlin Khairil, & Siti Eshah Mokshein. (2018). 21 st century assessment?: Online assessment.International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social9672. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i1/3838Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement forcategorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. PersonnelPsychology, 28(4), 563575. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1744-6570.1975.TB01393.XLeach, L. (2012). Optional self-assessment: Some tensions and dilemmas. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(2), 137147.https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2010.515013Leroux, J. a., & Lafleur, S. (1995). Employability Skills: the demands of the workplace. The Vocational Aspect of Education, 47(2), 189196.https://doi.org/10.1080/0305787950470207Lesmond, G., Mccahan, S., & Beach, D. (2017). Development of analytic rubrics for competencyassessment. The Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario. Toronto: Higher EducationQuality Council of Ontario.Liang, C., Chang, C.-C., Shu, K.-M., Tseng, J.-S., & Lin, C.-Y. (2016). Onlinereflective writing mechanisms and its effects on self-regulated learning: a case of web-basedportfolio assessment system. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(7), 16471664.https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1041403Light, T. P., L.Chen, H., & C.Ittleson, J. (2012). Documenting Learning witheportfolios. A guide for college instructors. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Linacre, J. M. (1994). Sample size and item calibration [or person measure] stability.Rasch Measurement Transaction, 7(4), 328.Linacre, J. M. (2002). Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness. Journal of AppliedMeasurement, 3, 85106.Linacre, J. M. (2004). Test Validity and Rasch Measurement: Construct, Content, etc.Rasch Measurement Transactions, 18(1), 970971.Linacre, J. M. (2006). Item discrimination and Rasch-Andrich thresholds. Rasch MeasurementTransaction, 20(1).Linacre, M. (2012). Winsteps Rasch Tutorial 2 Mike Linacre, instructor June 2012.Livingston, K. (2014). Teacher educators: Hidden professionals? European Journal ofEducation, 49(2), 218232. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12074Lorenzo, G., Ittelson, J., & Oblinger, D. (2005). Demonstrating and assessing studentlearning with eportfolios. EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative.Lorenzo, G., & Ittleson, J. (2005). An overview of institutional e-portfolios.EDUCAUSE, 2006(ELI Paper 2), 118.Lovorn, Michael, G., & Rezaei, A. R. (2011). Assessing the assessment: rubrics training forpre-service and new in-service teachers. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 16,118. Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=16&n=1Lu, J., & Zhang, Z. (2013). Assessing and supporting argumentation with online rubrics. International Education Studies, 6(7), 6677.https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v6n7p66Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantificatiom of content validity. NursingResearch, 35(6), 382385. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017Manju, A. (2014). Effectiveness Of value analysis model and value discussion model in developing valuing competencies. Bharathiar University. Retrieved fromhttp://hdl.handle.net/10603/95090Maripaz Abas-Mastura, Ombra A.Imam, & Shuki Osman. (2013). Employability Skills and TaskPerformance of Employees in Government Sector. International Journal of Humanities and SocialScience, 3(4), 150162.Mayer, E. (1992). Putting general education to work: The key competencies report.McCurry, D. (2003). Notions of generic and work-related skills: Essential, core,necessary and key skills and competencies. International Journal of Training Research,1(1), 8398. https://doi.org/10.5172/ijtr.1.1.83McHugh, M. (2012). Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276282.https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2012.031McLuckie, D., & Wesel, M. Van. (2010). Collaborative e-learning: e-Portfolios forassessment, teaching and learning. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 8(1), 2130.McNaughton, D., Hamlin, D., McCarthy, J., Head-Reeves, D., & Schreiner, M. (2008). Learning tolisten: teaching an active listening strategy to preservice education professionals. Topics inEarly Childhood Special Education, 27(4), 223231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121407311241Megat Aman Zahiri Megat Zakaria, Baharudin Aris, Jamaluddin Harun, & Mohd. Zolkifli binAbd. Hamid. (2007). Hubungan Antara Kemahiran Generik dengan Jantina, Pengkhususan dan PencapaianGuru-Guru Pelatih UTM: Satu Tinjauan. Seminar Penyelidikan Pendidikan Institut Perguruan BatuLintang Tahun 2007, (2005), 16.Messick, S. (1964). Personalilty measurement and the ethics of assessment. AmericanPsychologist, (November).Messick, S. (1998). Test validity: A matter of consequence. Social Indicators Research,45(13), 3544. https://doi.org/10.2307/27522333Michalsky, T., & Kramarski, B. (2015). Prompting reflections for integrating self-regulation into teacher technology education. Teachers College Record, 117(May).Mohamad Sattar Rasul, Rose Amnah Abd. Rauf, & Ahmad Rosli Mohd Nor. (2014). Future EmployabilitySkills Sets for Manufacturing Industries. International Education Studies, 7(10), 138144.https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n10p138Moh Roqib. (2013). Character education in a prophetic perspective. Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter, 3,240249.Mohd Azhar, A. H. (2003). Meningkatkan daya fikir. Kuala Lumpur: PTS Publications & DistributorsSdn Bhd.Mohd Azhar Abd Hamid. (2001). Pengenalan Pemikiran Kritis dan Kreatif. Skudai: Universiti TeknologiMalaysia.Mohd Effendi @ Ewan Mohd Matore, & Ahmad Zamri Khairani. (2014). Mengenalpasticabaran pelajar politeknik di Malaysia menerusi model Rasch. Journal of Quality Measurementand Analysis, 10(1), 5974.Mohd Hasrul Shuhari, & Mohd Fauzi Hamat. (2015). Nilai-nilai penting individu muslimmenurut Al-Ghazali. Jurnal Islam Dan Masyarakat Temporari, (9), 41 60.Mohd Kashfi Mohd Jailani. (2011). Manual pengenalan pengukuran Rasch & Winsteps.Bangi: Fakulti Pendidikan UKM.Mohd Kashfi Mohd Jailani, Rosseni Din, Siti Rahayah Ariffin, Sarimah Mokhtar, & Mohamed AminEmbi. (2011). Innovation using Rasch model approach in measuring multiple intelligences. In10th WSEAS international conference on E- Activities (pp. 202207). World Scientific andEngineering Academy and Society (WSEAS).Mohd Nashuha, J., Nasir, H., Baharudin, Y., Hamzah, M. O., Wan Kamarudin, W. H., Ahmad, N., & AhmadTarmizi, K. (1997). Siri pendidikan perguruan. Kemahiran berfikir dan belajar. Kuala Lumpur:Penerbit Fajar Bakti Sdn Bhd.Mohd Taib Dora, Norliah Kudus, Mahadi Abu Hassan, & Ruziah Ali. (2008). Kemahiran insaniah. 7 kompetensi unggul mahasiswa. Melaka: Penerbit Universiti Teknikal MalaysiaMelaka.Mohd Yusof, H., Ramlee, M., Syed A., M., & Seri Bunian, M. (2014). Verification of employabilityskills inventory using confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of AsianVocational Education and Training, 6, 19.Montgomery, K. (2000). Classroom rubrics?: Systematizing what teachers do naturally. The ClearingHouse?: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 73(6), 324328.https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650009599436Montgomery, K. (2002). Authentic Tasks and Rubrics: Going Beyond Traditional Assessments in College Teaching. College Teaching.https://doi.org/10.1080/87567550209595870Morales, L., Soler-Domnguez, A., & Tarkovska, V. (2016). Self-regulated learning and the roleof ePortfolios in business studies. Education and Information Technologies, 21(6),17331751. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9415-3Moskal, B. M. (2000). Scoring rubrics: what, when, how? Practical Assessment, Research &Evaluation, 7, 17.Moskal, B. M. (2003). Recommendations for developing classroom performance assessments andscoring rubrics. Practical Assessment Research Evaluation, 8(14), 19.Moss, P. A. (1994). Can there be validity without reliability? Educational Researcher, 23(2), 512.https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023002005Muhammad Aziz Shah Mohamed Arip, Nazariah Ab Samad, & Syed Sofian Syed Salim. (2016a).Kemahiran insaniah. In Pembangunan Sahsiah. Falsafah, Konsep, Teori dan Praktis (pp. 141170).Tanjong Malim: Penerbit Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.Muhammad Aziz Shah Mohamed Arip, Nazariah Ab Samad, & Syed Sofian Syed Salim. (2016b).Kemahiran insaniah. In Aslina Ahmad (Ed.), Pembangunan sahsiah. Falsafah, konsep, Teoridan Praktis (2nd ed., pp. 141170). Tanjong Malim: Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.National Center for Vocational Education Research. (2004). Defining generic skills: At a glance.Ngang, T. K., & Chan, T. C. (2015). The Importance of Ethics, Moral and Professional Skills ofNovice Teachers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 205(May), 812.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.09.004Niche Research Grant Scheme (NRGS). (2014). Model pentaksiran dan akauntabiliti guru berkualitimasa hadapan. Monograf Projek 3 Pentaksiran NRGS. Tanjong Malim.Nik Safiah Nik Ismail. (2010). Soft skills. The what. The why.The how. Bangi: Penerbit UKM.Noor Aini Ahmad. (2016). Senario menjalankan kajian inkuiri naratif. Tanjong Malim: ti PendidikanSultan Idris.Noor Mohamad Shakil Hameed. (2015, April 9). Inisiatif melahirkan graduan 3B.Utusan Malaysia.Norain Mohd Tajudin, Muzirah Musa, Rohaidah Masri, Faezah Samad, & Nor Zila Abd Hamid. (2015).Penyelidikan Pendidikan Matematik. (Jabatan Matematik, Ed.). Tanjong Malim: Fakulti Sains danMatematik UPSI.Nur Hafizoh Idris, & Rohana Hamzah. (2013). Nilai profesionalisme bakal guru berteraskanindikator standard guru Malaysia (SGM). Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences and Engineering), 60, 3137.https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v60.1445Odonovan, B., Price, M., & Rust, C. (2004). Know what I mean? Enhancing student understanding of assessment standards and criteria. Teaching in Higher Education, 9(3), 325335.https://doi.org/10.1080/1356251042000216642Oakley, G., Pegrum, M., & Johnston, S. (2013). Introducing e-portfolios to pre-service teachers astools for reflection and growth: lessons learnt. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 42(1),3650.Oluwatayo, J. A. (2012). Validity and reliability issues in educational research. Journal ofEducational and Social Research, 2(May), 391400.Onabamiro, A. T., Onuka, A. O. U., & Oyekanmi, S. A. (2014). Teachers Perception of Teachingand Assessing Soft Skills in Secondary Schools, 4(5), 109115.https://doi.org/10.5923/j.edu.20140405.01Osborne, J. W., & Costello, A. B. (2004). Sample Size and Subject to Item Ratio in PrincipalComponents Analysis and Exploratory Factor Analysis. Practical Assessment, Research &Evaluation, 9(11), 113. https://doi.org/10.4172/2155- 6180.1000106Othman Lebar, Azliza Muhammad, Siti Eshah Mokshein, & Sadiah Baharom. (2017). The use ofe-portfolio as an assessment tool to measure soft skills in teacher education program. InProceedings of ICERI2017 Conference (pp. 16361640).Overtoom, C. (2000). Employability Skills: An Update. ERIC Digest, (220), 18.Patton, M. Q. (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis.Health Services Research, 34(5 Pt 2), 11891208.Phan, T. X., & Phuong, H. Y. (2017). Using analytic rubric for speaking self-assessment: EFL students perceptions and challenges. IOSR Journal of Research & Method inEducation (IOSRJRME), 7(3), 3439.Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: are you sure you know whats beingreported? critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing &Health, 29, 489407.Polya, G. (1945). How to Solve It: A New Aspect of Mathematical Method. Princeton:Princeton University Press.Polymeropoulou, K., Togias, K., Karatrantou, A., & Kameas, A. (2012). VAB?: anePortfolio used to record and assess competences of adult students. In Proceedings of ePIC the10th International ePortfolio and Identity Conference (p. 124). London.Popham, W. J. (1997). Whats wrong--and whats right-- with rubrics. EducationalLeadership.Prakash, S., & Pallepati, A. (2016). Cross-cultural content validation of a modifiedservice quality questionnaire in Kannada. Journal of Indian Association of Public Health Dentistry,14(2), 171174. https://doi.org/10.4103/2319-5932.183811Pusat Teknologi Maklumat dan Komunikasi. (2015). Perbincangan tentang sistem e-portfolio.Tanjong Malim: Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.Rafidah Aga, M. J., & Li, L. P. (2016). Isu profesional dan etika dalam kaunseling dan psikoterapi(2nd ed.). Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Malaya.Ramesh, G., & Mahadevan, R. (2010). The ACE of soft skills. Attitude, communication and etiquettefor success. New Delhi: Dorling Kindersley.Rasul, M. S., Ismail, M. Y., Ismail, N., Rajuddin, M. R., & Rauf, R. A. A. (2008). Pembangunan standard pengukuran kemahiran employability. Jurnal Teknologi, 49, 1530.Razmawaty Mohamed, & Othman Lebar. (2017). Authentic assessment in assessing higher orderthinking skills. International Journal Of Academic Research In Business And Social Sciences, 7(2), 466476.https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i2/2021Reddy, Y. M., & Andrade, H. (2010). A review of rubric use in higher education.Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(4), 435448.https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930902862859Reeves, D. (2010). Framework for assessing 21st century skills. In J. Bellanca & R. Brandt (Eds.),21st century skills: rethinking how students learn. Bloomington: Solution Tree Press.Reynolds-Keefer, L. (2010). Rubric-referenced assessment in teacher preparation: An opportunity tolearn by using. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 15(8), 19. Retrieved fromhttp://www.pareonline.net/pdf/v15n8.pdfRhodes, L. K., & Nathenson-Mejia, S. (1992). Anecdotal records?: A powerful tool for ongoing literacy assessment. Reading Teacher, 45(7), 502509./http://www.jstor.org/stable/20200910Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2007). Design and development research: methods,strategies, and issues. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Richey, R. C., Klein, J. D., & Nelson, W. A. (2004). Developmental research?: Studies ofinstructional design and development. In Handbook of research for educational communications andtechnology (p. 10991130.).Riddle, E. J., & Smith, M. (2008). Developing and using rubrics in quantitative business courses.The Coastal Business Journal, 7(1), 8295.Rivas, M. R., De La Serna, M. C., & Martinez-Figueira, E. (2014). Electronic rubrics to assesscompetences in ICT subjects. European Educational Research Journal, 13(5), 584594.https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2014.13.5.584Roberts, T. S. (2006). Self, peer and group assessment in E-learning. An introduction. In Self,peer and group assessment in E-learning (pp. 116). Hershey PA: Information Science.Rodiah Idris, Siti Rahayah Ariffin, & Noriah Mohd Ishak. (2009). Pengaruh Kemahiran Generik dalam Kemahiran Pemikiran Kritikal, Penyelesaian Masalah dan Komunikasi Pelajar UniversitiKebangsaan Malaysia (UKM). Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 6, 103140.Rogers, C. R., & Farson, R. E. (1987). Active listening, 15.Rosenberg, M. (1989). Self-concept research?: A historical overview. Social Forces, 68(1), 3444.Rosli, R. ., Goldsby, D. ., & Capraro, M. M. . (2013). Assessing students mathematicalproblem-solving and problem-posing skills. Asian Social Science, 9, 5460.https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n16p54Ruhizan Mohammad Yasin, & Maizam Alias. (2013). Pengenalan kepadaPenyelidikan. In N. Idris (Ed.), Penyelidikan dalam pendidikan (2nd ed., pp. 2 17). Shah Alam: McGraw Hill Education (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd.Sadiah Baharom. (2009). Blogs as e-portfolios. The initiative?: An introduction.Retrieved June 29, 2015, from http://sadiahzee58.blogspot.comSadler, D. R. (2009). Indeterminacy in the use of preset criteria for assessment and grading. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(2), 159179.https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930801956059Saedah Siraj, Norlidah Alias, DeWitt, D., & Zaharah Hussin. (2013). Design anddevelopmental research. Emergent trends in educational research. Kuala Lumpur:Pearson Malaysia Sdn Bhd.Salzuriawani Ridzwan, & Siti Eshah Mokhsein. (2017). Creativity in preschool assessment.International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(2), 543560.https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i2/2663Schon, D. A., & DeSanctis, V. (1986). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think inaction. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 34(3), 2930.https://doi.org/10.1109/PROC.1985.13210Seal, C., & Miguel, K. (2015). Personal-interpersonal competence assessment: A self- report instrument for student development. Research in Higher Education Journal, 27, 110.Sekaran, U. (2003). Research methods for business. A skill building approach (4th ed.).Singapore: John Wiley & Sons,Inc.Seri Bunian Mokhtar, & Ramlee Mustapha. (2010). Pengaruh Faktor Persekitaran PembelajaranTerhadap Tahap Kemahiran Generik Daari Perspektif Pelajar Politeknik Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi. Prosiding Seminar Kebangsaan Pendidikan Negara Kali Ke-4, 4356.Shaheen Majid, Liming, Z., Tong, S., & Siti Raihana. (2012). Importance of Soft Skills forEducation and Career Success. International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education(IJCDSE), Special Is(2), 10361042.Sharifi, A., & Hassaskhah, J. (2011). The role of portfolio assessment and reflection on processwriting. Asian EFL Journal, 13(1).Shin, S. (2015). Developing a framework for using E-portfolios as a research andassessment tool, (June 2013). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344013000189Siemens, G. (2004). Connectivism. A Learning Theory for the Digital Age: Http://www.Elearnspace. org/Articles/connectivism. Htm, 115.Siemens, G. (2006). Connectivism: Learning theory or pastime of the self-amused.Manitoba, Canada: Learning Technologies Centre.Simon, S. D. (2001). From neo-behaviorism to social construtivism - the paradigmatic non-evolutionof Albert Bandura.Sinar Online. (2013). Upsi perkasa guru melalui pendedahan antarabangsa.Siti Rahayah Ariffin, Rodiah Idris, & Noriah Mohd Ishak. (2010). Differential item functioning inMalaysian Generic Skills Instrument ( MyGSI ). Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 35(1), 110.Siti Salwa Sawari, & Azlina Mustaffa. (2014). Guru bersahsiah mulia menurut pandang Ibnu Sahnun?:Analisa buku ada Al-Mualimin. The Online Journal of Islamic Education, 2(2), 110.Smallbone, T., & Quinton, S. (2004). Increasing business students confidence inquestioning the validity and reliability of their research. Electronic Journal ofBusiness Research Methods, 2(2), 153162.Stefani, L., Mason, R., & Pegler, C. (2007). The educational potential of e-portfolios.Supporting personal development and reflective learning. Oxon: Routledge.Stevens, D. D., & Levi, A. J. (2013). Introduction to rubrics. Stylus Publishing(2nd ed.). Sterling.Stevens, S. S. (1968). Measurement, statistics and schemapiric view. Science, New Series,161(3844), 849856.Strong, B., Davis, M., & Hawks, V. (2004). Self-grading in large general education classes: A casestudy. College Teaching, 52(2), 5257.Strudler, N., & Wetzel, K. (2011). Electronic portfolios in teacher education: Forging a middleground. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 44(2), 161173.Swan, G. (2009). Examining barriers in faculty adoption of an e-portfolio system.Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(5), 627644.Syed Muhd Kamal S.A.Bakar;, Ahmad Esa;, & Syed Muhamad Dawilah Syed Abdullah. (2014). Instrumen penilaian kemahiran generik dalam kursus Pendidikan Jasmani dan Kesihatan (PJK): Metode kajian. In Persidangan Pentaksiran Pra Universiti dan Pendidikan Tinggi(pp. 225236).Taat, M. S. (2014). Melahirkan guru berkualiti. Utusan Borneo, p. B4.Tan, K. (2007). Conceptions of self-assessment?: What is needed for long-term learning??In D. Boud & N. Falchikov (Eds.), Rethinking assessment in higher education?: Learningfor the long term (pp. 114127). London: Routledge.Tang, K. N., Hashim, N. H., & Yunus, H. M. (2015). Novice Teacher Perceptions of the Soft SkillsNeeded in Todays Workplace. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 177(July 2014), 284288.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.338Tara , M. (2008). Issues of power and equity in two models of self-assessment.Higher Education, 13(1), 8192.Tarling, R. (2009). Statistical modelling for social researchers: Principles andpractice. New York: Routledge.Thompson, G., Pilgrim, A., & Oliver, K. (2005). Self-assessment and reflective learningfor first-year university geography students: A simple guide or simply misguided? Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 29(3), 403420. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260500290959Thorndike, R. M. (1991). Measurement and evaluation in psychology and education(5th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Thorndike, R. M. (1997). Measurement and evaluation in psychology and education(6th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Treuer, K. Von, Sturre, V., Keele, S., & Mcleod, J. (2011). An integrated model for the evaluationof work placements. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 12(3), 196204.Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times: Learning forLife in Our Times. 21st Century Skills Learning for life in our times.Turner, D. B. (2015). Utilizing LMS tools to help with student assessment in an online course. EAIEndorsed Transactions on E-Learning, 2(6), 15.Tynjala, P., Virtanen, A., Klemola, U., & Kostiainen, E. (2016). Developing socialcompetence and other generic skills in teacher education?: applying the model of integrativepedagogy. European Journal of Teacher Education, 39(3), 368387.https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2016.1171314Unit Perancang Ekonomi. (2006). Rancangan Malaysia Kesembilan 2006-2010.Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris. (2014). Rubrik kemahiran insaniah (Edisi 2014Semakan Semula). Tanjong Malim: Bahagian Pembangunan Akademik dan Kualiti.Van De Poel, I., & Royakkers, L. (2007). The ethical cycle. Journal of Business Ethics, 71(1),113.Vaughan, N. (2013). Investigating how digital technologies can support a triad -approach for student assessment in higher education. Canadian Journal of Learning andTechnology, 39(3).Viera, A. J., & Garrett, J. M. (2005). Understanding interobserver agreement: The kappastatistic. Family Medicine, 37(5), 360363.Voogt, J., Erstad, O., Dede, C., & Mishra, P. (2013). Challenges to learning andschooling in the digital networked world of the 21st century. Journal of ComputerAssisted Learning, 29(5), 403413. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12029Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society. Memory (Vol. Mind in So). Cambridge: HarvardUniversity Press. https://doi.org/(Original manuscripts [ca. 1930-1934])Wolf, K., Connelly, M., & Komara, A. (2008). A Tale of Two Rubrics: Improving Teaching andLearning Across the Content Areas through Assessment. The Journal of Effective Teaching,8(1), 2132.Wolf, K., & Stevens, E. (2007). The role of rubrics in advancing and assessing student learning.The Journal of Effective Teaching, 7(1), 314.World Economic Forum. (2017). Can soft skills save your job from the robots? Your best commentson the future of work.Wright, B. D., & Masters, G. N. (1982). Rating Scale Analysis. Rasch Measurement.Chicago: MESA Press.Wyatt-Smith, C., & Cumming, J. J. (2009). Educational assessment in the 21st century.Connecting theory and practice. New York: Springer.Yaghmale, F. (2003). Content validity and its estimation. Journal of MedicalEducation, 3, 2527.Yamada, Y., & Nagai, M. (2015). Positive mood enhances divergent but not convergent thinking. Japanese Psychological Research, 57(4), 281287.https://doi.org/10.1111/jpr.12093Zaidon, S., Ayob, A., & Ikhsan, O. (2014). Pembinaan rubrik penilaian penulisankanak-kanak. Jurnal Pendidikan Bitara UPSI, 7, 8695.Zhao, Y. (2012). World Class Learners: Educating Creative and Entrepreneurial Students.Thousand Oals: Corwin.Zieky, M., & Perie, M. (2006). A primer on setting cut scores on tests of educational achievement.ETS Report.Zim erman, B. J. (1986). Becoming a self-regulated learner: Which are the keysubprocesses? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11(4), 307313.

Pembinaan dan validasi rubrik pentaksiran kendiri kemahiran insaniah, E-Persona

Similar Items