Pengaruh jantina, gaya kognitif dan personaliti warna terhadap pencapaian akademik pelajar diploma

Kajian ini bertujuan mengenal pasti pengaruh jantina, gaya kognitif dan personalitiwarna terhadap pencapaian akademik pelajar. Kaedah tinjauan berbentuk CrossSectional digunakan dalam kajian ini. Sampel kajian terdiri daripada 322 orangpelajar yang sedang mengikuti pengajian Diploma di enam fakulti...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Rashidin Idris
Format:	thesis
Language:	zsm
Published:	2019
Subjects:	BF Psychology
Online Access:	https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5524
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:5524
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
collection	UPSI Digital Repository
language	zsm
topic	BF Psychology
spellingShingle	BF Psychology Rashidin Idris Pengaruh jantina, gaya kognitif dan personaliti warna terhadap pencapaian akademik pelajar diploma
description	Kajian ini bertujuan mengenal pasti pengaruh jantina, gaya kognitif dan personalitiwarna terhadap pencapaian akademik pelajar. Kaedah tinjauan berbentuk CrossSectional digunakan dalam kajian ini. Sampel kajian terdiri daripada 322 orangpelajar yang sedang mengikuti pengajian Diploma di enam fakulti UniversitiPendidikan Sultan Idris (UPSI). Instrumen Group Embedded Figure Test (GEFT)oleh Witkin et al., (1977) bersama Inventori Personaliti Warna oleh Sidek (2005)digunakan untuk mengumpul data kajian. Hasil kajian mendapati pelajar lelaki danperempuan mempunyai gaya kognitif yang sama iaitu Bebas Medan, 2(1,N= 320) =0.43, p =.511. Namun, kajian menunjukan terdapat perbezaan yang signifikan darisegi jantina pelajar dalam personaliti warna Hijau (t(320) = 1.89, p = .05) dan Emas(t(320) = -2.42, p =.01). Dapatan menunjukan bahawa gaya kognitif pelajar tidakmempunyai perbezaan signifikan dengan pencapaian akademik (t(320) = -.40, p=.685). Walau bagaimanapun, pencapaian akademik pelajar mempunyai perbezaansignifikan berdasarkan faktor personaliti warna (F(3,318) = 4.55, p
format	thesis
qualification_name
qualification_level	Master's degree
author	Rashidin Idris
author_facet	Rashidin Idris
author_sort	Rashidin Idris
title	Pengaruh jantina, gaya kognitif dan personaliti warna terhadap pencapaian akademik pelajar diploma
title_short	Pengaruh jantina, gaya kognitif dan personaliti warna terhadap pencapaian akademik pelajar diploma
title_full	Pengaruh jantina, gaya kognitif dan personaliti warna terhadap pencapaian akademik pelajar diploma
title_fullStr	Pengaruh jantina, gaya kognitif dan personaliti warna terhadap pencapaian akademik pelajar diploma
title_full_unstemmed	Pengaruh jantina, gaya kognitif dan personaliti warna terhadap pencapaian akademik pelajar diploma
title_sort	pengaruh jantina, gaya kognitif dan personaliti warna terhadap pencapaian akademik pelajar diploma
granting_institution	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
granting_department	Fakulti Pembangunan Manusia
publishDate	2019
url	https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5524
_version_	1747833205361213440
spelling	oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:55242021-02-04 Pengaruh jantina, gaya kognitif dan personaliti warna terhadap pencapaian akademik pelajar diploma 2019 Rashidin Idris BF Psychology Kajian ini bertujuan mengenal pasti pengaruh jantina, gaya kognitif dan personalitiwarna terhadap pencapaian akademik pelajar. Kaedah tinjauan berbentuk CrossSectional digunakan dalam kajian ini. Sampel kajian terdiri daripada 322 orangpelajar yang sedang mengikuti pengajian Diploma di enam fakulti UniversitiPendidikan Sultan Idris (UPSI). Instrumen Group Embedded Figure Test (GEFT)oleh Witkin et al., (1977) bersama Inventori Personaliti Warna oleh Sidek (2005)digunakan untuk mengumpul data kajian. Hasil kajian mendapati pelajar lelaki danperempuan mempunyai gaya kognitif yang sama iaitu Bebas Medan, 2(1,N= 320) =0.43, p =.511. Namun, kajian menunjukan terdapat perbezaan yang signifikan darisegi jantina pelajar dalam personaliti warna Hijau (t(320) = 1.89, p = .05) dan Emas(t(320) = -2.42, p =.01). Dapatan menunjukan bahawa gaya kognitif pelajar tidakmempunyai perbezaan signifikan dengan pencapaian akademik (t(320) = -.40, p=.685). Walau bagaimanapun, pencapaian akademik pelajar mempunyai perbezaansignifikan berdasarkan faktor personaliti warna (F(3,318) = 4.55, p 2019 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5524 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5524 text zsm closedAccess Masters Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Pembangunan Manusia Adeyemo, D. A. (2007). Moderating influence of emotional intelligence on the linkbetween academic self-efficacy and achievement of university students.Psychology and Developing Societies, 19, 199-213.Ahmad Jazimin Jusoh. (2006). Hubungan Personaliti Warna dengan Minat Kerjayadalam Kalangan Staf UPSI. Tesis Doktor Falsafah yang tidak diterbitkan.Tanjung Malim: UPSI.Ahmad Roslan Yunus., Mukhiffun Mukapit., & Amir Aris. (2010). Keselarasanpersonaliti persekitaran pendidikan dengan pencapaian akademik pelajar.Diperoleh dari https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280996787.Ahiauzu, S. C. (2017). Relationship among field dependent/independent,convergent/divergent cognitives styles and academic achievement of secondaryschool student in Rivers State Nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice,8(24), 183-191.Ali Yazdanpanah Nozari., & Hasan Siamian. (2015). The relationship between fielddependent and independent cognitive style and understanding of english textreading and academic success. Materia Socio Medica, 27(1), 39-41.Alamgir Khan., Salahuddin Khan., Syed Zialul Islam Khan., & Manzor Khan. (2016).Impact of teacher personality on the academics of the students. Journal ofPhysical Education Research, 3(2), 74-79.Altun, A., & Cakan, M. (2006). Undergraduate Students Academic Achievement,Field Dependent/Independent Cognitive Styles and Attitude toward Computers.Educational Technology & Society, 9(1), 289-297.American Psychology Association. (2010). Publication Manual of the AmericanPsychological Association. Washington: APA Publisher.Asia Barakat., & Afaf Othman. (2015). The five-factor model of personality and itsrelationship to cognitive style (rush and prudence) and academic achievementamong a sample of students. Journal of Education and Practice, 6, 35.Azar Hosseini Fatemi, Vahideh Sadat Vahedi., & Zari Sadat Seyyedrezaie. (2014). Theeffects of top-down/bottom-up processing and field-dependent/fieldindependent cognitive style on iranian efl learners reading comprehension.Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(4), 686-693.Bacon., S. C. (2011). Academic self-concept and academic achievement of AfricanAmerican students transitioning from urban to rural schools." PhD (Doctor ofPhilosophy) thesis, University of Iowa.Balkis, M. (2011). Academic efficacy as a mediator and moderator variable in therelationship between academic procrastination and academic achievement.Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 45, 1-16.Balkis, M. & Duru, E. (2015). Gender Differences in the Relationship betweenAcademic Procrastination, Satifaction with Academic Life and AcademicPerformance. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology,15(1), 105-125.Bakker, I., Theo. V. D. V., Vink. P., Boon., & J., Bazley. C. (2013). Color Preferencesfor Different Topics in Connection to Personal Characteristics. UnitedKingdom: Wiley Periodicals, Inc.Banai, B., & Perin, V. (2016). Type of high school predicts academic performance atUniversity better than individual differences. PLOS ONE, 11(10), 1-16.Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H.Freeman and Company.Bimler. D., & Kirkland. J. (2009). Colour-space distortion in women who areheterozygous for colour deficiency. Vision Reseacrh, 49(5), 536-543.Brady-Amoon, P., & Fuertes, J. (2011). Self-efficacy, self-rated abilities, adjustment,and academic performance. Journal of Counseling and Development, 89, 431-438.Breso, E., Schaufeli, W. B., & Salanova, M. (2011). Can a self-efficacy-basedintervention decrease burnout, increase engagement, and enhanceperformance? A quasiexperimental study. Higher Education, 61(4), 339-355.Brown, D., & Brooks, L. (1991). Career Counseling Techniques. Boston: Allyn &Bacon.Burger, J. M. (2008). Personality. New York: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.Buss, D. M., & Larsen, R. J. (2010). Personality Psychology. Domains of Knowledgeabout Human Nature. New York: McGraw-Hill.Busato, V. V., Prins, F. J., Elshout, J. J., & Hamaker, C. (2000). Intellectual ability,learning style, personality, achievement motivation and academic success ofpsychology students in higher education. Personality and IndividualDifferences, 29, 1057-1068.Butler, T., & Scurlock-Evans, L. (2013). Personality and Individual Differences.United Kingdom: Pearson Education Limited.Bonnardel. V., Beniwal. S., Dubey. N., Pande. M., & Bimler. D. (2017). Genderdifference in color preference across culture: an archetypal pattern modulatedby female cultural stereotype. Color Res Appl. Retrived by 11 October 2018.http://doi.org/10.1002/col.22188.Cassidy, S., & Eachus, P. (2012). The development of the general academic selfefficacyscale (GASE). Paper presented at the British Psychological SocietyAnnual Conference March 13-16, Blackpool, UK.Chua Yan Piaw. (2014). Kaedah Penyelidikan. Kaedah dan Statistik Penyelidikan Buku1. Kuala Lumpur: McGraw-Hill Education.Conard, M. A. (2006). Aptitude is not enough: How personality and behavior predictacademic performance. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 339-346.Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.Cummings, A. M. (2014). The impact of student support services on academic successat a select historically black college and university. UNF Theses andDissertations. Retrived by 6 May 2017. http://digitalcommons.unf.edu/etd/532.De Feyter, T., Caers, R., Vigna, C., & Berings, D. (2012). Unraveling the impact of thebig five personality traits on academic performance: The moderating andmediating effects of self-efficacy and academic motivation. Learning andIndividual Differences, 22, 439-448.Dirocco, D. R. (2012). The effect of the color red on test anxiety and academicachievement. Lycoming Education Paper.Elias, S. M., & MacDonald, S. (2007). Using past performance, proxy efficacy, andacademic self-efficacy to predict college performance. Journal of AppliedSocial Psychology, 37, 2518-2531.Feist, J., & Feist, G. J. (2009). Theories of Personality. New York: McGraw-HillHigher Education.Filiz Eyuboglu., & Feza Orhan (2011). Paging and scrolling: Cognitive styles inlearning from Hypermedia. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42, 5065.Furnham, A., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2004). Personality and intellingence aspredictors of statistic examination grades. Personality and IndividualDifferences, 37, 943-955.Friedman. H. S., & Schustack. M., W. (2011). Personality: Classic Theories andModern Research. California: Pearson.Gaurav. B., Sinha., A. P & Zhao., H. (2011). An extended tuning method for costsensitiveregression and forecasting. Decision Support System, 51(3), 372-383.George, D., and Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows Step By Step: A Simple Guideand Reference. 11.0 Update. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Gilhooly, K. J., Lyddy, F., & Pollick, F. (2014). Cognitive Psychology. London:McGraw Hill Education.Goff, M., & Ackerman, P. L. (1992). Personalityintelligence relations: Assessment oftypical intellectual engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 537552.Guilford, J. P. (1973). Fundamental Statistics in Psychology and Education. New York:McGraw-Hill.Hasnah Mohamed. (2012). Kesan Penggunaan Perisian Pendidikan TerhadapPencapaian Pelajar Merentasi Gaya Kognitif. Tesis PhD yang tidak diterbitkan.Skudai, Johor: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.Husna Hidayah Mansor & Rohaidah Kamaruddin. (2016). Personality as one ofextraguistic factors that influenced in learning second language among foreignstudents. International Journal of the Malay world and civilization, 4(1), 105-103.Holt, N., & Walker, L. (2009). Research Method. Theory, Plans and Practices. UnitedStates: Palgrave Macmillan Publisher.Honicke, T., & Broadbent, J. (2016). The Relation of Academic Self-Efficacy toUniversity Student Academic Performance: A Systematic Review. EducationalResearch Review, 17, 63-84.Ihab Mahmoud Hanafya., & Reham Sanad. (2015). Colour preferences according toeducational background. 6th World conference on Psychology Counseling andGuidance, 14 16 May 2015. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 205,437 444.Irfan, M., & Shabana, N., K. (2015). Factors Affecting Students AcademicPerformance. Global Journals of Management and Business Research, 12(9),2249-2256.Jaccard, J., Guilamo-Ramos, V., Johansson, M., & Bouris, A. (2006). Multipleregression analyses in clinical child and adolescent psychology. Journal ofClinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 35(3), 456-479.Jailani Md. Yunos., Wan Mohd Rashid Wan Ahmad., & Ahmad Rizal Madar. (2007).Field Dependence - Independence Students and Animation GraphicCourseware Based Instruction. Malaysian Education Dean Council, 1, 17-28.Keith, T. (2006). Multiple regression and beyond. United Statess: Allyn & Bacon.Kepner, M. C. & Neirmark, E. D. (1984). Test-retest reliability and differential patternsof score change on the group embedded figures test. Journal of Personality andSocial Psychology, 46(6), 1405-1413.Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for ResearchActivities. Educational and Psychology Measurement. United States: SagePublications, Inc.Larsen. R. J., & Buss. D. M. (2010). Personality Psychology. Domains of Knowledgeabout Human Nature. New York: McGraw Hill Publications.Lourdusamy, A. (1994). Perbezaan Gaya Kognitif Individu dan Implikasinya TerhadapPendidikan. (Siri Syarahan Perlantikan Professor 1995 Bil. 3). Pulau Pinang:Universiti Sains Malaysia.Lourdusamy, A. (1998). Perbezaan Gaya Kognitif Individu Dan Implikasi TerhadapPendidikan. Pulau Pinang: Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia.Lscher, M. (1981). Personality Signs. United States: Warner Books.Mahoney, B. (2011). Personality and Individual Difference. New York: SAGEPublisher.Masoud Khalili Sabet., & Shahrbanoo Mohammadi. (2013). The relationship betweenfield independence/ dependence styles and reading comprehension abilities ofefl readers. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(11), 2141-2150.Masoud Seid Motahari., & Mehrnoush Norouzi. (2015). The difference between fieldindependent and field dependent cognitive styles regarding translation quality.Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(11), 2373- 2381.Mathhew, G., Deary, I. J., & Whiteman, M. C., (2009). Personality Traits. UnitedKingdom: Cambridge University Press.Macdonald, L., Mylonas, D., & Paramei, G. (2012). Gender differences in colournaming. Conference: PICS-Progress in Colour Studies 2012, Glasgow,Scotland.McLeish, U. O. (2016). Emotions, personality, emotional intelligence and leadership inthe workplace: the prevailing attitude. International Journal of Economics,Commerce and Management, 4(3), 350-355.Melvin, R. W. (2015). The Relationship between Personality and Student Learning.Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 27(4), 135-146.Mitra, F., Mohamad, S. B., Maryam, S., & Fateme, N. 2014. Relationship between fielddependence/independence and language proficiency of female efl students.International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 6(3), 208-220.Mohammad, R., & Seyyedeh, M. N. (2014). Field dependence/independence cognitivestyles: are they significant at different levels of vocabulary knowledge?.International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies, 2(1), 2173- 2179.Mohd. Majid Konting. (2004). Kaedah Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Hulu Kelang,Selangor: Dawama Sdn. Bhd.Mohd. Yusri Ibrahim. (2010). Bimbingan cepat analisis data penyelidikan: PendidikanSains Sosial. Kuantan: Bandar Ilmu.Mohd. Yusri Ibrahim. (2017). Sembang santai penyelidikan. Besut: Bandar Ilmu.Mohd. Zuri Ghani., Nik Rusila Nik Yaacob., Aznan Che Ahmad., Rahimi Che Aman.,& Zainuddin Mat Isa. (2010). Perbezaan personaliti kestabilan emosi dalamkalangan pelajar pintar cerdas akademik berdasarkan jantina dan jenis sekolah.Asia Pacific Journal of Educator and Education, 25, 153-167.Morales, L. P. (2015). Relationship between cognitive processes and academicperformance in high school students. Psychologia: Avances de la Disciplina,9(2), 85-100.Muhammad Bazlan Mustafa., Ahmad Jazimin Jusoh., Syed Sofian Syed Salim.,Mohammad Nasir Bistaman., & Mohammad Aziz Shah Mohamed Arip. (2015).Perkembangan Personaliti Pelajar Program Pengajian Pendidikan. Jurnal BitaraEdisi Khas (Psikologi Kaunseling), 8, 755-760.Mohd Zulfabli Hasan, Md. Tareq Hossain., & Md. Aminul Islam., Factors AffectingSelf-Efficacy Towards Academic Performance: A Study on PolytechnicStudents in Malaysia. Adv Environ Biology, 8(9), 695-705.Nurwahidah, A. G, Nooraini, O., & Siti Norayu, M. B. (2013). Perbezaan personalitipsiko- spiritual dalam kalangan pelajar sekolah menengah di semenanjungMalaysia. Journal of Human Development and Communication, 2, 105110.Norhani, B., Noor Zainab, A. R., Hamidah, A. R., & Aminah, A. K. (2005). Puncaprestasi pembelajaran yang lemah di kalangan pelajar fakulti pengurusan danpembangunan sumber manusia, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, skudai, Johor.Jurnal Teknologi, 43, 2944.Odogbo. E., C. (2017). Does personality type, cognitive style and study approach haveeffect on the academic performance of accounting students: A comparativestudy of South Africa and Nigeria. Proceeding of 61 The IRES InternationalConference, Doha, Qatar, 25-26 February 2017.Omer Faruk Sozcu. (2014). The relationship between cognitive style of fielddependence and learner variable in e-learning instruction. Turkish OnlineJournal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 15, 2-10.Osborne, J., & Waters, E. (2002). Four assumptions of multiple regression thatresearchers should always test. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation,8(2). Retrieved by 17 Oct 2017. http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=8&n=2.Papsova. M., Valihorov. M & Nb?lkova. E. (2012). Exploring the moderating effectof field dependence-independence on relationship between pupils schoolsatisfaction and social classroom atmosphere. Studia Psychologica, 54(2), 120-125.Perger, M., & Takacs, I. (2016). Factors Contributing To Students Academic SuccessBased On The Student Opinion At BME Faculty Of Economic And SocialScience. Periodica Polytechnica Social and Management Sciences. 24(2), 119-135.Pithers, R. T. (2002). Cognitive learning style: a review of the field dependent fieldindependent approach. Journal of Education and Training, 54, 117-132.Poh Bee Theen., & Melissa Ng Lee Yen Abdullah. (2008). Kesan Faktor Jantina, EtnikDan Gaya Kognitif Ke Atas Pencapaian Pengajian Am. Jurnal Pendidik danPendidikan, 23, 123140.Poole, M., & OFarrell, P. (1971). The assumptions of the linear regression model.Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 52, 145-158.Prieto. J. P. E. (2006). Discovering The Relationship Between Personality Type AndPredicted Academic Success. United States: True Colour Association Org.Ramlah Jantan (2014). Relationship between Students Cognitive Style (Field-Dependent and Field-Independent Cognitive Styles) with their MathematicAchievement in Primary School. International Journal of Humanities SocialSciences and Education, 1(10), 88-93.Ramlah Jantan (2016). Relationship between Students Cognitive Style (Field-Dependent and Field-Independent Cognitive Styles) with their MathematicAchievement in Primary School. International Conference on Education andNew Learning Technologies, 4-6 July, Barcelona, Spain.Redhwan, A. A., Muhamed, T. O., Zaliha I., Yuri V. B., Muhammad S. A., Menendez-Gonzalez, M. (2015). Relation between type of personality and academicperformance among Malaysian health sciences students. International Archivesof Medicine Section: Psychiatry and Mental Health, 8, 181-182.Riding, R. J., and Rayner, S. (1998). Cognitive Styles and Learning Strategies. London:David Fulton Publishers.Riegler, R. B & Riegler. R. G. (2012). Cognitive Psychology. Applying the Science OfThe Mind. London: Allyn & Bacon.Rim, K. C., & Yoon. Y. B. (2015). Study of learning performance improvement basedon color changes of test sheets. Interneational Journal of Multimedia andUbiquitous Engineering, 10(9), 9-16.Robbins, S. B., Lauver, K., Le, H., Davis, S., Langley, R., & Carlstrom, A. (2004). Dopsychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes? A Meta-AnalysisPsychological Bulletin, 130(2), 261-268.Rohaidah Kamaruddin. (2012). Hubungan faktor ekstralinguistik bahasa kedua denganpencapaian bahasa melayu pelajar-pelajar melayu di negeri sembilan. Tesis PhDyang tidak diterbitkan. Serdang: Universiti Putra Malaysia.Rosniah Mustaffa. (2007). Mengadaptasikan Gaya pembelajaran pelajar ESL: satukajian kes pelajar tahun satu di ukm. GEMA Online Journal of LanguageStudies, 7, 1-32.Ryckman, M. R. (2008). Theories of Personalities. London: Thomson WadsworthPublication.Saucier, G., & Goldberg, L. (2001). Lexical studies of indigoneous personality factors:Premises, product and prospect. Journal of Personality, 69, 847-79.Sahinidis, A. G., Frangos. C. & Fragkos. K. C. (2013). The relationship betweenpersonality type and academic performance. The case of Greek university's. The3rd International Conference: Quantitative and Qualitative in the Economic andAdministrative Science (Q.M.A.S 2013) Athens, Greece, May 23 2013, pp. 333-344.Salmiza, S. (2012). Teaching practices among secondary school teachers in Malaysia.International Proceedings of Economics Development and Research, 47, 63-67.Sekaran, U. (1992). Research Method for Business: A Skill Building Approach. NewYork: John Wiley.Seyyedeh Mitra Niroomand., & Mohammad Rostampour. (2014). The impact of fielddependence/independence cognitive styles and gender differences on lexicalknowledge: the case of iranian academic efl learners. Theory and Practice inLanguage Studies, 4(10), 2173-2179.Schultz, D. P & Schultz. S. E. (2009). Theories of Personality. United States:Wadsworth Cengage Learning.Sidek Mohd Noah. (2005). Pengujian dan Penilaian dalam Kaunseling. Teori danAplikasi. Serdang: Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM).Sunita, N., & Sadawarte, S. K. (2014). Relationship between big five personality traitsand academic performance in medical students. Journal of Evolution ofMedical and Dental Sciences, 3(17), 4446-4452.Spengler, M., Ludtke, O., Martin, R., & Brunner, N. (2013). Personality is related toeducational outcomes in late adolescence: Evidence from two large-scaleachievement studies. American Psychological Association, 47, 613-625.Stevens, J. P. (2009). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. New York,NY: Routledge.Sorokowski. P., Sorokowski. A., & Witzel. C. (2012). Sex differences in colorpreferences transcend extreme differences in culture and ecology. Psychon BulRev, 21(5), 1195-1201.Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics. Boston, US:Pearson.Wan Mohd Fazli Bin Wan Yusop. (2014). Faktor Yang Mendorong PencapaianAkademik Pelajar Dalam Program Kimpalan Di Kolej Vokasional. FakultiPendidikan Teknikal dan Vokasional. Tesis Master yang tidak diterbitkan. BatuPahat, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia.Weiner, I & Craighead, W. (2010). The Corsini encyclopedia of psychology, Hoboken,NJ: John Wiley.White, T. L., & McBurney, D. H. (2013). Research Methods. London: CengageLearning Wadsworth.Witkin, H. A., & Asch, S.E. (1948). Studies in space orientation: further experimentson perception of the upright with displaces visual field. Journal ofExperimental Psychology, 43, 58-67.Witkin, H. A. & Goodenough, D.R. (1981). Cognitive Styles: Essence and Origins.New York: International Universities Press, Inc.Witkin, H. A., Oltman, P. K. , Raskin E., & Karp S. A. (2002). Group EmbeddedFigures Test Sampler Set Manual and Sample Figures and Scoring. New York:Mind Garden, Inc.Witkin, H. A., Moore, C.A., Goodenough, D.R., & Cox, P.W. (1977). Field dependentand field independent cognitive styles and their educational implications.Review of Educational Research, 47(1), 164.Witkin, H.A., Oltman, P., Raskin, E., & Karp, S. A. (1971). A Manual for EmbeddedFigures. United States: Mind garden, Inc.Wong, W., & Hines, M. (2015). Effects of Gender Color-Coding on Toddlers Gender-Typical Toy Play. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 1233-1242.Yahya, M. AlMurtadha., & Abdelrahman, O., Elfalaki. (2016). Factors InfluencingAcademic Achievement of Undergraduate Computing Student. InternationalJournal of Computer Applications, 146, 3-10.Zamri Mahamod. (2012). Inovasi P&P dalam pendidikan Bahasa Melayu. TanjungMalim: Penerbit Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.Zulelawati Bujang., & Yusni Zaini Yusof. (2015). Trait personaliti dan hubungandengan prestasi akademik bakal guru di sebuah institusi latihan perguruan.Jurnal Bitara Edisi Khas (Psikologi Kaunseling), 8, 120-128.Zahra Alimorad. (2013). Is field dependence/independence a source of test bias iniranian efl majors cloze test performance. Pan-Pacific Association of AppliedLinguistics, 17(2), 39-51.

Pengaruh jantina, gaya kognitif dan personaliti warna terhadap pencapaian akademik pelajar diploma

Similar Items