Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi tahap pengintegrasian teknologi maklumat dan komunikasi dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran guru Sekolah Rendah Jenis Kebangsaan Cina di daerah Seremban

Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi tahap pengintegrasian teknologi maklumat dan komunikasi dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran guru Sekolah Rendah Jenis Kebangsaan Cina di daerah Seremban

Kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengenal pasti faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi tahappengintegrasian teknologi maklumat dan komunikasi (TMK) dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran(PdP) guru Sekolah Rendah Jenis Kebangsaan Cina daerah Seremban. Kajian ini menggunakan rekabentuk tinjauan melibatkan 799 orang gur...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Voon, Yan Xue
Format: thesis
Language:zsm
Published: 2018
Subjects:
LB Theory and practice of education
Online Access:https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5787
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:5787
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
collection UPSI Digital Repository
language zsm
topic LB Theory and practice of education
spellingShingle LB Theory and practice of education
Voon, Yan Xue
Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi tahap pengintegrasian teknologi maklumat dan komunikasi dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran guru Sekolah Rendah Jenis Kebangsaan Cina di daerah Seremban
description Kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengenal pasti faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi tahappengintegrasian teknologi maklumat dan komunikasi (TMK) dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran(PdP) guru Sekolah Rendah Jenis Kebangsaan Cina daerah Seremban. Kajian ini menggunakan rekabentuk tinjauan melibatkan 799 orang guru. Data dikumpul menggunakan borang soal selidik.Data dianalisis menggunakan statistik deskriptif dan inferens. Kajian ini mendapati tahapkesesuaian TMK dalam PdP ( = 0.188, p
format thesis
qualification_name
qualification_level Master's degree
author Voon, Yan Xue
author_facet Voon, Yan Xue
author_sort Voon, Yan Xue
title Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi tahap pengintegrasian teknologi maklumat dan komunikasi dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran guru Sekolah Rendah Jenis Kebangsaan Cina di daerah Seremban
title_short Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi tahap pengintegrasian teknologi maklumat dan komunikasi dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran guru Sekolah Rendah Jenis Kebangsaan Cina di daerah Seremban
title_full Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi tahap pengintegrasian teknologi maklumat dan komunikasi dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran guru Sekolah Rendah Jenis Kebangsaan Cina di daerah Seremban
title_fullStr Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi tahap pengintegrasian teknologi maklumat dan komunikasi dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran guru Sekolah Rendah Jenis Kebangsaan Cina di daerah Seremban
title_full_unstemmed Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi tahap pengintegrasian teknologi maklumat dan komunikasi dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran guru Sekolah Rendah Jenis Kebangsaan Cina di daerah Seremban
title_sort faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi tahap pengintegrasian teknologi maklumat dan komunikasi dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran guru sekolah rendah jenis kebangsaan cina di daerah seremban
granting_institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
granting_department Fakulti Pengurusan dan Ekonomi
publishDate 2018
url https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5787
_version_ 1747833227869945856
spelling oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:57872021-04-08 Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi tahap pengintegrasian teknologi maklumat dan komunikasi dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran guru Sekolah Rendah Jenis Kebangsaan Cina di daerah Seremban 2018 Voon, Yan Xue LB Theory and practice of education Kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengenal pasti faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi tahappengintegrasian teknologi maklumat dan komunikasi (TMK) dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran(PdP) guru Sekolah Rendah Jenis Kebangsaan Cina daerah Seremban. Kajian ini menggunakan rekabentuk tinjauan melibatkan 799 orang guru. Data dikumpul menggunakan borang soal selidik.Data dianalisis menggunakan statistik deskriptif dan inferens. Kajian ini mendapati tahapkesesuaian TMK dalam PdP ( = 0.188, p 2018 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5787 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5787 text zsm closedAccess Masters Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Pengurusan dan Ekonomi 1BestariNet. (2012). Frog VLE. Retrieved from http://1bestarinet.net/1BestariNet Online Reporting. (n.d.). Retrieved June 1, 2016, from https://edw.yes.my/MOEReports/NOCHomePageM.aspxA. Birch, & V. Irvine. (2009). Preservice Teachers Acceptance of ICT Integration inthe Classroom: Applying the UTAUT Model. Educational Media International 46, 295 315.Abdul Said Ambotang, Pilus, N., & Abdullah, C. A. Q. (2014). Penggunaan TeknologiMaklumat Dan Komunikasi (ICT) Dalam Kalangan Guru-Guru Sekolah Kebangsaan. Igarss 2014,(1), 15. http://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Orgnizational Behavior and HumanDecision Processes, 50, 179211. http://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-TAlwahaishi, S., & Snsel, V. (2013). Consumers Acceptance and Use of Information andCommunications Technology: A UTAUT and Flow Based Theoretical Model. Journal of TechnologyManagement & Innovation, 8(2), 910. http://doi.org/10.4067/S0718- 27242013000200005Aquilina, C. (2011). Exploring the extent of Technophobia?: a study conducted in the MaltesePublic.Arumugam Raman, Don, Y., Khalid, R., Hussin, F., Omar, M. S., & Ghani, M. (2014).Technology Acceptance o Smart Board among Teachers in Terengganu Using UTAUT Model, 8491.ASEAN DNA. (2012). ASEAN Average Internet Speed Index 2014. Retrieved fromhttps://www.facebook.com/ASEANDNA/infoAttuquayefio, NiiBoi, S., & Addo, H. (2014). Using the UTAUT model to analyze students ICTadoption. International Journal of Education & Development Using Information & Communication Technology, 10(3), 7586. Retrieved fromhttp://ezproxy.usq.edu.au/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh&AN=97923459&site=ehost-liveAyankunle Adegbite Taiwo, & Alan G.Downe. (2013). The Theory of User Acceptance and Use ofTechnology (UTAUT): A Meta-Analytic Review of Empirical Findings. Journal of Theoritical andApplied Information Technology, 49, No1, 4858.Azlina Abu Bakar, Zaidi, F., Razak, A., Salihin, W., & Abdullah, W. (2013). Assessing the effectsof UTAUT and Self-determination perdictor on students continuance intention to use student portal.World Applied Science Journal 21, 14841489.Bakar, M. N., & A. Hadi, R. (2011). Pengintegrasian ICT dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Matematik di Kalangan Guru Matematik di Daerah Kota Tinggi. Journal of Science andMathematics Educational, 2, 117.Botjan umak, Gregor Polancic, & Marjan Hericko. (2010). An emperical study of virtual learningenvronment adoption using UTAUT. In Mobile, Hybrid and On-line Learning. Second InternationalConference on IEEE, 1722.Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012). New Frameworks for Studying and Assessing theDevelopment of Computational Thinking, 125.Buabeng-Andoh, C. (2012). Factors influencing teachers adoption and integration ofinformation and communication technology into teaching?: A review of the literatureCharles Buabeng-Andoh. International Journal of Education and Development Using Informationand COmmunication, 8(1), 136155.Cassim, K. M., & Obono, S. D. E. (2011). On the Factors Affecting the Adoption of ICT for theTeaching of Word Problems, I.Cherian, E. J., & Williams, P. (2009). Assessing Mobile Learning Effectiveness andAcceptance. MIS Quarterly, PhD, 110. Retrieved from http://www.paulwwilliamsphd.com/index_files/Assessing_Mobile_Learning_Effectiveness_and_Acceptance.pdfChiao-Chen, C. (2013). Library mobile application in university libraries. LIbrary Hi Tech 32.Davies, R. B. (1977). Hypothesis Testing When a Nuisance Parameter is Present Only Under theAlternative. Biometrika, Vol. 64, pp.247-254.Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance ofInformation Technology. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13, N, 319340.Demissie, D. H. (2011). Investigating users acceptance of a Learning CommunityManagement System (LCMS) in the Commonwealth of Bahamas: The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Useof Technology (UTAUT) framework approach.Deng, S., Liu, Y., & Qi, Y. (2011). An emperical study on determinants of web basedquestion answer services adoption. Online Information Review, 789798.Devolder, Payno, & Duyck. (2011). Predicting secondary school teachers acceptance anduse of a digital learning environment.A cross-sectional study. Computers in HumanBehaviour 28.Donaldson, R. (2011). Student Acceptance of Mobile Learning.Edda Tandi Lwoga, & Questier, F. (2014). Faculty adoption and usage behavior of openaccess scholarly communication in health science universities. New Library Word 115,116139.Ely, D. P. (1990). Conditions that facilitate the implementation of educationaltechnology innovations. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, v. 23, 298305.Fatema Akbar. (2013). What Affects Students Acceptance and Use of Technology?Carnegie Mellon University.Fisher, C. (2007). Researching and Writing a Dissertation For Business Students. UK:Prentice Education.G??, A., Nistor, N., & Lerche, T. (2012). Educational technology acceptance acrosscultures: A validation of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology in the context ofTurkish national culture. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(4), 394408.Gruzd, A., Staves, K., & Wilk, A. (2012). Connected Scholars:Examining the Role of Social Media inResearch Practices of Faculty using the UTAUT Model.Hanover Reasearch. (2011). Blended Learning Programs. Hanover Reasearch, DistrictAdministration Practice.Horn, M. B., & Staker, H. (2011). The Rise of K-12 Blended Learning. Innosight Institute,(January). Retrieved from http://www.christenseninstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/The-rise-of-K-12-blended-learning.pdfHsiao, C. H., & Tang, K.-Y. (2014). Explaining undergraduates Behavior intention od e-textbook adpotion: Emperical Assessment of Five Theoretical Models. LIbrary Hi Tech 32, 139163.I Gusti Nyoman Sedana, & Wijaya, S. W. (2010). UTAUT model for understanding learning managementsystem. Internetworking Internet Journal.Jamal@Nordin Yunus, Ramlee, I., & Kamis, H. (2011). Analisis Data dan Pentafsiran denganmenggunakan SPSS (1st ed.). Titisan Ilham Sdn. Bhd,.Johari Rashida. (2011). Penggunaan ICT Dalam Proses Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran DiKalangan Pendidik Fakulti Pendidikan, 4(December), 2237.Joned, R. (2010). Metodologi Penyelidikan. Serdang, Selangor: Upm Holdings Sdn. Bhd.Joutsenvirta, T. (2010). Blended Learning in Finland. (T. J. ja L. Myyry, Ed.). Helsinki:Faculty of Social Sciences at the University of Helsinki. Retrieved from http://www.helsinki.fi/valtiotieteellinen/julkaisut/blended_learning_Finland.htmlKementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2012). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia2013,2025. Putrajaya. Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.my/userfiles/file/PPP/Preliminary-Blueprint-ExecSummary-BM.pdfKhairuddin Nisa. (2012). Keberkesanan GeoTV Terhadap Pencapaian dan Minat Pelajar aruhCuaca dan Iklim Terhadap Kegiatan Manusia.Kristen Sosulski, & Vai, M. (2011). Essentials of Online Course Design: A Standards-Based Guide.Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.Lakhal, S., Khechine, H., & Pascot, D. (2013). Student behavioural intentions to use desktop videoconferencing in a distance course:integration of autonomy to the UTAUT model. Journal of Computingin Higher Education.Mahmud, R., Arif, M., Ismail, H., & Ibrahim, J. (2011). Tahap Kemahiran danPengintegrasian ICT di kalangan Guru Sekolah Bestari, 1999, 513.Malaysia, K. P. (2007). Kad Laporan Pelaksanaan Pelan Induk Pembangunan Pendidikan2006-1010. Kuala Lumpur.Maria Aguirre. (2012). Singapore: Integrating ICT Use in the Curriculum. Singapore: ICTs for the bottom of Pyramid. Retrieved from http://ict4bop.wordpress.com/2012/04/19/singapore-integrating-ict-use-in-the- curriculum/Marican, S. (2009). Kaedah Penyelidikan Sains Sosial. Pearson Prentice Hall.Marjorie Vai, & Sosulski, K. (2011). Essentials of Online Course Design. USA: Routledge, Taylor &Francis Group.Martin Fishbein, & Icek Ajzen. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: Anintroduction to Theory and Reseach. Addison-Wesley,Reading MA.Mikre, F. (2011). The Roles of Information Communication Technologies in Education ReviewArticle with Emphasis to the Computer and Internet, (July).Mohamed, N., Mahmud, R., & Hj. Nawawi, M. D. (2012). Tahap Pengintegrasian ICT dan Kewujudan Kondisi Ely yang Menyokong Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran dalam Kalangan Guru SekolahRendah. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan Malaysia, Bilangan 2(Mac 2012), 513.Mohamed Noh, N., Ahmad Mustafa, H. M., Hamzah, M., Ismail, M. A., & Abdullah, N.(2013). Penggunaan Inovasi Teknologi Dalam Pengajaran: Cabaran Guru Dalam E- Pembelajaran.Proceedings Of The 7th International Malaysian Educational Technology Convention (IMETC 2013),(Technology Enhanced Global Classroom Environment), 1 12.Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an Instrument to Measure thePerceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation. Information Systems Research,191222.Mustafa, S. I. S., & Miskon, A. S. (2010). Guru dan Cabaran Semasa (1st ed.). Malaysia, Malaysia:Penerbitan Multimedia Sdn. Bhd.Nicolae Nistor, Baltes, B., & Schustek, M. (2012). Knowledge sharig and educationaltechnology acceptance in online academic communities of practice. Campus-Wide InformationSystems 116.Niwala Haswita Hussin, Jaafar, J., & Downe, A. G. (2011). Assessing Educators Acceptance ofVirtual Reality (VR) in the Classroom Using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology(UTAUT). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.Noraini, A., Hamidon, K., & Mohd. Izham, M. H. (2015). Amalan Kepimpinan Teknologi Pengetuadalam Pengintegrasian ICT di Sekolah Menengah. 3rd Global Summit on Education,2015(March), 684694.Noremy Che Azemi, & Fadilah Mat Assain. (2010). Tahap Kepuasan Pelajar terhadapKemudahan dan Perkhidmatan yang Disediakan di Politeknik Port Dickson (PPD) bagi sesi Disember2010. Seminar Penyelidikan Dan Inovasi, (Isqae), 111.Norijah Mohamed, Haslina Hassan, & Md. Nor Zamani Abu Hassan. (2014). Tahap kesediaanpengintegrasian teknologi maklumat dan komunikasi (ICT) dalam pengajaran terhadap murid-muridpra-sekolah: Satu tinjauan. Jurnal Pendidikan IPGK Ilmu Khas. Retrieved fromhttp://ipgkik.com/v2/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Artikel18_2014.pdfNUTP. (2013). Penjelasan Mengenai Ujian Kompetensi ICT Guru 2013. NUTP, p. 18.Oye, N. ., A.Iahad, N., & Ab.Rahim, N. (2012). Acceptance and Usage of ICT by UniversityAcademicians Using UTAUT Model?: A Case Study of University of Port Harcourt , Nigeria.Journal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information Sciences, 3(1), 81 89.Oye, N. D., Iahad, N., & Rahim, N. Z. A. (2011). A Model of ICT Acceptance and Use for Teachers inHigher Education Institutions. International Journal of Computer Science & Communication Networks,1(October), 2240.Oye, N. A. Iahad, & N. A. Rahim. (2014). The History of UTAUT model and its impact on ICTacceptance and usage by academicians. Education and Information Technologies 19, 251270.Pardamean, B., & Susanto, M. (2012). Assessing User Acceptance toward Blog Technology using theUTAUT Model. International Journal of Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 203212.Pat Maier, & Warren, A. (2002). Integrating Technology in Learning and Teaching. Kugon PageLimited.Paul Juinn Bing Tan. (2013). Applyin the UTAUT to Understand Factors Affecting the Use of EnglishE-learning Websites in Taiwan. SAGE Open, 112.Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013 - 2025.Rose, S., Spinks, N., & Canhoto, A. I. (2015). Management Research: Applying thePrinciples.Saforrudin, N., Zaman, H. B., & Ahmad, A. (2012). Penggunaan Alat PengaranganMultimedia dalam kalangan Pendidik Guru?: Faktor Pemilihan.Schaik, P. van. (2009). Unified Theory of Acceptance and use for Websites used by Studentsducation.Research, 40(2), 229257.http://doi.org/10.2190/EC.40.2.eSedana, I., & Wijaya, S. W. (2010). Penerapan Model Utaut untuk Memahami Penerimaan dan PenggunaanLearning Management System Studi Kasus: Experential E-Learning of Sanata Dharma University. JurnalSistem Informasi Fakultas Ilmu Komputer, 5(2), 114 120.Sekarini, Y. A. (2013). Analisis Pengaruh Minat Pemnafaatan dan Penggunaan SistemInformasi terhadap Niat Individu dengan menggunakan Model UTAUT. Universitas Diponegoro.Sharifah Nor, P., & Kamarul Azman, A. S. (2011). Tahap Kesediaan Penggunaan ICT dalam Pengajarandan Kesannya Terhadap Hasil Kerja dan Tingkah Laku Murid Prasekolah. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia,36(1), 2534.Sharon E. Smaldino. (2008). Instructional Technology and Media for Learning. PearsonPrentice Hall.Singapore, M. (n.d.). Our ICT Masterplan. Retrieved from http://ictconnection.moe.edu.sg/ictc/our-ict-masterplan-journey/our-ict-in-education-journeySSQS. (2014). Smart School Qualification Standards, 2014. Retrieved from http://ssqswpkl.btpnsel.edu.my/StakerHeather, & Horn, M. B. (2012). Classifying K 12 Blended Learning. InnosightInstitute.Sugnah, S. (2016). Tahap Kemahiran Ict Guru dan Pengurusan Pengetahuan Di SekolahRendah, Johor, (January).Sulaiman, S., Mohamad, I., Haziah, S., & Ratnavadivel, N. (2011). Pengetahuan TentangPelajar dan Pembelajaran dalam Kalangan Guru Pelatih Teknologi Maklumat. Jurnal TeknologiPendidikan Malaysia, 4(1), 3141.Tan, P. J. B. (2013). Applying the UTAUT to Understand Factors Affecting the Use ofEnglish E-Learning Websites in Taiwan. SAGE Open, 3(4), 112. http://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013503837Tan, S. C., Chai, C. S., Lee, C. B., Teo, T. K. G., Chen, W., Koh, J. H. L., Cheah, H. M.(2010). Evaluation of Implementation of the IT Masterplan 3 and its Impact on SingaporeSchools. The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology. Singapore. Retrieved fromhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25262545Tan, S. C., Wang, Q., & Chen, W. (2013). Implementation of IT Masterplan 3 in Singapore?: Insightsfrom the Mid-term Evaluation. Global Chinese Journal For Computers In Education, 10(1), 3654. Retrieved from8.59.33/GCJCE/papers/journal270.pdfTasir, Z., Linggu, J. S., & Harun, J. (2011). Penggunaan Alat Rangkaian Sosial di kalanganPelajar di sebuah TS di Kota Kinabalu , Malaysia.Jurnal Teknologi PendidikanMalaysia, 3147.Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995). Assessing IT usage: The role of prior experience. ManagementInformation Systems Quarterly, 19(4), 561570. http://doi.org/10.2307/249633Thompson, R. L., & Higgins, C. A. (1991). Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Modelof Utilization. MIS Quarterly, 15, 125143.Timothy Teo, & Jan Noyes. (2012). Explaining the intention to use technology among pre- serviceteachers: amulti-group analysis of Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology,Interactive Learning Environments, 116.Toms Escobar-Rodrguez, Carvajal-Trujillo, E., & Monge-Lozano, P. (2014). Factors thatinfluence the perceived advantages and relevance of Facebook as a learning tool:Anextension of the UTAUT. Australian Journal of Education Technology, 136151.UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2014). Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in Education in Asia. Canada: UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved fromhttp://www.uis.unesco.orgVallerand, R. J. (1997). Toward a Hierarchiral Model of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation.Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 271360.Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User Acceptanceof Information Technology: Toward A Unified, 27(3), 425478.Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer Acceptance and Use ofInformation Technology?: Extending the Unified Theory. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157 178.Warschauer, M. (2007). The paradoxical future of digital learning. In Learning Inquiry (Vol.1, pp. 4149).Wells, C. S., & Wollack, J. A. (2003). An Instructors Guide to Understanding TestReliability.White, A. (2008). From Comfort Zone to Performance Management Understandingdevelopment and performance From Comfort Zone to Performance Management,(April), 117.

Similar Items