Analisis model struktural kepercayaan Matematik, persekitaran pembelajaran dan pencapaian Matematik murid sekolah berprestasi tinggi
Kajian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dan membina model pengukuran bagikepercayaan matematik, persekitaran pebelajaran dan pencapaian matematik murid di SekolahBerprestasi Tinggi (SBT). Pendekatan kuantitatif dengan rekabentuk kaedah tinjauan digunakandalam kajian ini. Responden kajian terdiri dar...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | thesis |
Language: | zsm |
Published: |
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5902 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:5902 |
---|---|
record_format |
uketd_dc |
institution |
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
collection |
UPSI Digital Repository |
language |
zsm |
topic |
QA Mathematics |
spellingShingle |
QA Mathematics Aida Suzaini Abu Bakar Analisis model struktural kepercayaan Matematik, persekitaran pembelajaran dan pencapaian Matematik murid sekolah berprestasi tinggi |
description |
Kajian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dan membina model pengukuran bagikepercayaan matematik, persekitaran pebelajaran dan pencapaian matematik murid di SekolahBerprestasi Tinggi (SBT). Pendekatan kuantitatif dengan rekabentuk kaedah tinjauan digunakandalam kajian ini. Responden kajian terdiri daripada 500 orang murid tingkatan empat daripada limabuah SBT. Kajian tinjauan ini dijalankan menggunakan satu set soal selidik yang terbahagi kepadatiga bahagian. Bahagian A mengandungi soalan berbentuk demografik untuk mendapatkan maklumat peribadi responden. Bahagian B yang terdiri daripada 40 item pula mengkajipersepsi murid terhadap persekitaran pembelajaran di dalam bilik darjah melibatkan keakrabanmurid, sokongan guru, penglibatan, kerjasama dan kesaksamaan murid menggunakan What Is Happening In This Class (WIHIC). Bahagian C mengandungi 12 item yang mewakili konstrukkepercayaan matematik yang terdiri daripada dua dimensi iaitu kepercayaan tradisional dankepercayaan konstruktivisme. Pencapaian matematik murid pula adalah berdasarkan gred yangdiperoleh responden dalam Peperiksaan Pertengahan Tahun. Analisis statistik melibatkananalisis faktor penerokaan, analisis faktor pengesahan dan model struktural. Dapatan menunjukkanbahawa kepercayaan matematik menunjukkan bahawa murid di SBT lebih cenderung kepada kepercayaankonstruktivisme (M = 4.27,S.P = 0.47) berbanding kepercayaan tradisional (M =3.96, S.P = 0.67). Dapatan juga menunjukkanhubungan yang lemah (r = 0.12, p>.00 I) antara kepercayaan matematik dengan persekitaran pembelajaran. Namun, dapatan menunjukkan kepercayaan matematik tidak menyumbang ({3= 0.10, p |
format |
thesis |
qualification_name |
|
qualification_level |
Master's degree |
author |
Aida Suzaini Abu Bakar |
author_facet |
Aida Suzaini Abu Bakar |
author_sort |
Aida Suzaini Abu Bakar |
title |
Analisis model struktural kepercayaan Matematik, persekitaran pembelajaran dan pencapaian Matematik murid sekolah berprestasi tinggi |
title_short |
Analisis model struktural kepercayaan Matematik, persekitaran pembelajaran dan pencapaian Matematik murid sekolah berprestasi tinggi |
title_full |
Analisis model struktural kepercayaan Matematik, persekitaran pembelajaran dan pencapaian Matematik murid sekolah berprestasi tinggi |
title_fullStr |
Analisis model struktural kepercayaan Matematik, persekitaran pembelajaran dan pencapaian Matematik murid sekolah berprestasi tinggi |
title_full_unstemmed |
Analisis model struktural kepercayaan Matematik, persekitaran pembelajaran dan pencapaian Matematik murid sekolah berprestasi tinggi |
title_sort |
analisis model struktural kepercayaan matematik, persekitaran pembelajaran dan pencapaian matematik murid sekolah berprestasi tinggi |
granting_institution |
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
granting_department |
Fakulti Sains dan Matematik |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5902 |
_version_ |
1747833234508480512 |
spelling |
oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:59022021-04-23 Analisis model struktural kepercayaan Matematik, persekitaran pembelajaran dan pencapaian Matematik murid sekolah berprestasi tinggi 2018 Aida Suzaini Abu Bakar QA Mathematics Kajian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dan membina model pengukuran bagikepercayaan matematik, persekitaran pebelajaran dan pencapaian matematik murid di SekolahBerprestasi Tinggi (SBT). Pendekatan kuantitatif dengan rekabentuk kaedah tinjauan digunakandalam kajian ini. Responden kajian terdiri daripada 500 orang murid tingkatan empat daripada limabuah SBT. Kajian tinjauan ini dijalankan menggunakan satu set soal selidik yang terbahagi kepadatiga bahagian. Bahagian A mengandungi soalan berbentuk demografik untuk mendapatkan maklumat peribadi responden. Bahagian B yang terdiri daripada 40 item pula mengkajipersepsi murid terhadap persekitaran pembelajaran di dalam bilik darjah melibatkan keakrabanmurid, sokongan guru, penglibatan, kerjasama dan kesaksamaan murid menggunakan What Is Happening In This Class (WIHIC). Bahagian C mengandungi 12 item yang mewakili konstrukkepercayaan matematik yang terdiri daripada dua dimensi iaitu kepercayaan tradisional dankepercayaan konstruktivisme. Pencapaian matematik murid pula adalah berdasarkan gred yangdiperoleh responden dalam Peperiksaan Pertengahan Tahun. Analisis statistik melibatkananalisis faktor penerokaan, analisis faktor pengesahan dan model struktural. Dapatan menunjukkanbahawa kepercayaan matematik menunjukkan bahawa murid di SBT lebih cenderung kepada kepercayaankonstruktivisme (M = 4.27,S.P = 0.47) berbanding kepercayaan tradisional (M =3.96, S.P = 0.67). Dapatan juga menunjukkanhubungan yang lemah (r = 0.12, p>.00 I) antara kepercayaan matematik dengan persekitaran pembelajaran. Namun, dapatan menunjukkan kepercayaan matematik tidak menyumbang ({3= 0.10, p 2018 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5902 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5902 text zsm closedAccess Masters Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Sains dan Matematik Ab. Rahim Selamat, Kamarolzaman Mohd. Jidi, Hazrimah Ab. Rahim & Hazrita AB. Rahim, 2012. SekolahBerpresasi Tinggi SBT Satu...Tran. formasi. Penerbit UTHM.Abdul Rahman Abdul Majid Khan. (2007). Guru sebagai penyelidik. Kuala Lumpur PTS ProfesionalPublishing Sdn. Bhd.Abdul RaofDalip. (1998). Teknik pengajaran dan pembelajaran agama islam di sekolah menengah. DLMPendidikan di Malaysia. Bangi. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.Agus Rizal & Effandi Zakaria. (2013). Kepercayaan Matematik Dan Kefahaman Konseptual Pelajar Dalam Topik Integral. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematik, 1(2), 14-26.Akthiar Pardi & Shamsina Shamsudin.(2011). Pengantar Penyelidikan Tindakan dalam PenyelidikanPendidikan (3?? ed.). Penerbitan Multimedia Sdn. Bhd.Aldridge, J. M Fraser, B. J. & Huang, T. C. (1999). Investigating classroom environment in Taiwanand Australia with multiple research methods. The Journal of Educational Research, 93(1), 48-62.Alt, D. (2015). Using structural equation modelling and multidimension scaling to asses students'perceptions of learning environment and justice experiences. International Journal f EducationalResearch. 69, 38-49.Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Razavieh, A. (2002). Introduction to research in education(edisi keenam). Belmont, CA: Thomson LearningArsyathamby Veloo & Shamsudin Ahmad. (2011). Hubungan sikap, kebimbangan dan tabiat pembelajarandengan pencapaian Matematik Tambahan. Asia Pas(fik Journal of Educators and Education, 26(1),15-32.Aruwa, 0. S.(2011). Infl.uences on attitude to Mathematics. Aukcland University of Technology.Ayatollah Karimi & Venkatesan, S. (2009). Mathematics anxiety, Mathematics performance and academichardiness in high school students. International Journal Education Science, 1(1), 33-37.Azizi Yahya, YusofBoon, Shahrin Hashim & Wan Zuraidah Wan Hamid. (2002).Hubungan antara gaya pembelajaran dengan pencapaian akademik. Kertas kerja dibentangkan diInternational Conference on The Challenge on Leaming and Teaching In Brave New World di HatyaiCity College Thailand and School of Cognitive and Education, Thailand, 14-16 Oktober 2002.Baki, A., Catioglu, H., Costu, S., & Birgin, 0. (2009). Conceptions of high school students aboutmathematical connections to the real-life. World Co,?ference on Educational Sciences 2009,Procedia Social and Behavoiral Sciences J, 1402- 1407.Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theo1y. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Barlow, A. T. & Reddish, J.M. (2006). Mathematical myths: Teacher candidate's beliefs and theimplication for teacher educators. The Teacher Educator 41, 145- 157.Beijaard, D., Meijer, P. C., &Verloop, N. (2004). Reoconsidering research on teachers'professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 107-128.Best J. W & Khan, J.V. (1998). Research in Education. M. A: Allyn and BaconBorges de! Rosal, A., Hernandez-Jorge, C. M., Gonzalez Sierra, M.A. (2011).Achievement predictors in secondary students' sample. Quality & Quantity,46(6), 1687-1697.Bowring-Carr, C., & West-Burnh, J (1999), Bela.Jar secara berkesan di sekolah. Terj. Annuar Ayob(Edisi ke-6). Kuala Lumpur: Institut Terjemahan Negara Malaysia.Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1996). Psychologycal theory and the design of innovative learningenvironments: On procedures, principles and system. In Innovations in learning: New environmentsfor education, Schauble & R Glaser (Eds.), (289-325). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Byrne, B. M. 2010. Structural Equation Modelling with AMOS: Basic Concepts Applications andProgramming. Edisi kedua. New York: Taylor & Francis Group (LLC).Carmichael, C. & Taylor, J. (2005). Analysis of student beliefs in a tertiary preparatorymathematics course. International Journal o.f Mathematical Education in Science and Technology,36(7). 713-719. Retrieved May 09, 2017 from EBSCO. http://www.epnet.com.Cawelti, G. (2004). A synthesis of research on high-performing school systems. In G. Cawelti(ed.), handbook of research on improving student achievement (3rd ed.,pp. J 0-24). Arlington, VA: Educational Research Service.Chapman, 0. (2001). Understanding high school mathematics teacher growth. Dim.M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen (pnyt.). Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the InternationalGroup for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Utrecht: Utrecht University.Che Nidzam Che Ahmad, Kamisah Osman & Lilia Halim, (2010). Hubungan ramalan persekitaranpembelajaran makmal sains dengan tahap kepuasan pel[!jar. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 35 (2).19-30. ISSN 0126-6020 / 2180-0782.Chen, C., & Stevenson, H. W. (1995). Motivation and mathematics achievement: A comparative studyof Asian-America, Caucasian-America, and East Asian high school students. Child Development, 66,1215-1234.Chua Y.P. (2009). Statistik Penyelidikan Lanjutan II: ujian regresi, analisis faktor dan analisisSEM. Buku 5. Shah Alam: McGraw Hill (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd.Chua Y. P. (2011). Kaedah Penyelidikan. (Edisi kedua). Kuala Lumpur: McGraw Hill EducationChua Y. P. (2012). Asas Statistik Penyelidikan. (Edisi kedua). Kuala Lumpur: Mc Graw HillEducation.Cleary, T. J., & Chen, P. P (2009). Self-regulation, motivation and Math achievement in middleschool: Variations across grade level and Math context. Journal of School Psychology, 47(5),291-314.Creemers, B. (1994). The effective Classroom. London: CasselCreemers, B. P. M. (1997). Vissions that work: A further elaboration ofcomprehensive model of educational effectiveness. Paper represented at Annual Meeting of theAmerican Educational Research Association, Chicapo, IL.Dron, J. (2007). Control and Constraint in -Learning: Choosing When to Choose.Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.Dunkin, M. J., & Biddle, BJ. (1974). The study of teaching. New York NY: Holt, Rineheart &Winston.Effandi Zakaria & Norulpauziana Musiran. (2010). Beliefs about the Nature of Mathematics,Mathematics Teaching and Learning among Trainee Teachers. The Social Science 5(4), 346-351. Effandi Zakaria, Norazah Mohd Nordin, Lilia Halim, Md Yusoff Daud, Nor Sakinah Mohammad & T.Subahan Mohd Meerah. (2010). Assesing the Mathematical Beliefs of Pre-Service Mathematics Teachersin Malaysia. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, 7(3).Enochs, L. G., Smith, P. I. , & Huinker, D. (2000). Establishing factorial validity of themathematics teaching efficacy instrument School Science and Mathematics, 100(4), 194-202.Erasmus, P. (2013). Relationship between emotional intelligence, study orientation in Maths andMath achievement of middles adolescent boys and girls. CSE Journal (?/Education, 12-21.Ernest, P. (1989). The Impact of Beliefs on the Teaching (?/Mathematics, in Ernest, P Ed.Mathematics Teaching: The State of the Art, London: Falmer Press, 1989: 249-254.Evans, B. D. (2003). Early childhood (K-5) pre-service teachers' belief about mathematics, teachingmathematics, and learning mathematics. Dissertation. Georgia Southern University. Dokumen ProQuestInformation and Learning [12 Mei 2008].Fah, L.Y., & Hoon, K. C (2009). An investigation og factors that contribute to rural students'Mathematics achievement: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach. In Third InternationalConference on Science and Mathematics E.ducation (CoSMed). Retrieved fromhttp://www.recsam.edu.my/cosmed/cosmed09/AbstractsFullPapers2009/Abstract/Mathematics Parallel PDF/Full Paper/Ml4.pdfFah, L.Y., & Hoon, K. C. (2012). Pengenalan Kepada Pendekatan Kuantitatif dalam PenyelidikanPendidikan. Kota Kinabalu, Sabah: Penerbitan Universiti Malaysia Sabah.FauziaKhurshid, Afifa Tanveer & Farah Naz Qasmi. (2012). Realtionship between study habits andacademic achievement among hostel living and day scholars' university students. British Journalof Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(2), 34- 42.Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3?? ed.). SAGE Publications. Fraser, B. J.(2012). Classroom environment. Oxou. UK: Routledge Taylor & FrancisGroup.Fraser, B. J. (1998). Classroom environment instruments: Development, validity and applications.Journal of Learning Enviroment Research. 1(2), 7-38Fraser, B. J. & Walberg, H.J. (1991). ,ducation environment: Evaluation, antecedents andconsequences. Oxford, England: Pergamont Press.Fredriksen, K. & Rhodes, J. (2004). The role of teacher relationships in the lives of students.Retrieved from http://www.interscience.wiley.com/journal/l09614153/abstract.pdfGardiner, W. L. (I 989). Forecasting, Planning and the future of information society.Dim. High technology workplace: lntergrating technology, management and design for productive workenvironments, Goumain, P. (Ed.). 27-39. New York: Van Nostand Reinhold.Goldin, G. A. (1998). Representational system, learning and problem solving in mathematics.Journalfor Research in Mathematics Behaviour. 17(2), 137-165.Haenlein, M., & Kaplan, A. M. (2004). A beginners' guide to Partial Least Squares Anaylisi.Understanding Statistics, 3(4), 283-339.Hart, L. E. (2002). Preservice teachers' beliefs and practice after participating in anintegrated content/ method5 course. School Science and Mathematics I 02(1): 4- 15.Hair, J. F., Black, W. C. Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E. & Tatham, R. L. (2006).Multivariate Data Analysis. Edisi ke-6. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis.Edisi ke-7. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Hair, J.F., Ringle, C. M., (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. The Journal of Marketing Theoryand Practice, 19(2), 139-152.Haniza Abdul Khali d. (2003). Attitude and Motivation Toward English as a Medium of Instruction.Kertas Projek Sarjana (Tidak Diterbitkan) . Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malysia.Hattie, J. (2003). Teachers Make a Different What is the Research Evidence?www.docstoc.com/docs/2251792/Teachers-Make-a-Difference.Howse, M. (2006). What is the nature of African American teachers' beliefs about mathematics andhow these beliefs relate to their beliefs about the performance of Africa American mathematicsstudents? Dissertation. Florida State Universi ty. Dokumen ProQuest Education Journal and ERIC fulltext 12 Mei 2008. http://www.weer.wise.edu/ncisla/publications/reports/NCISLAReport1.pdfJackson, R. (2008). Students can Learn on Their Own.http ://teacherneedhelp.com/students/.Jennings, M. (2009). Issues in bridging between senior secondary and first year universitymathematics, 1.Kamus Dewan Bahasa Edisi ke-4. (2007). Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2012). Dipetik daripada http://www.moe.gov.my/v/asrama penuh.Kerlinger, F. N. & Lee. H. B. (2000). Foundations of Behavioural Research. 4?? Edition. Holt, NY:Harcourt College Publisher.Klen, A. M. &Connell, J. P. (2004). Engineering Youth in School. Retrieved fromhttp://www.Irre.org/public ations/pdfs/Engagin g Youth 9-8-2004.pdfKline, R. B. (2005). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modelling. Edisi ke-2. New Yorkand Lond on: The Guilford Press.Kloosterman, P., Raymond, A. M. & Emenaker, C. (1996). Students beliefs about mathematics: athree-year study. The Elementary School Journal. 97(1): 40-56.Krejic R.V., & Morgan D.W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activitie s.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610.Lazim, Abu Osman, & Wan Salihin. (2004). The statistical evidence in describing the student'sbelief about mathematics. The International Journal.for Mathematics TeachingandLearning, 6(1),1-12.Lewin, K. (1943). "Defining the field at a given time". Psychological Review, 50, 292-310.Malaysia 2010. Rancangan Malaysia Ke Sepuluh 2011-2015.McLoughin, C. & Lee, M. J. W. (2010). Personalized and self-regulated learning in the Web 2.0era: International exemplars of innovative pedagogy using social software. Australasian Journal ofEducational Technology, 26(1), 28-43.Martin, J., & Sugarman, J. (1993). Models of classroom management: Principles, applications, andcritical perpective, 2?? ed. Calgary: Detselig Enterprises.Mason, L. (2003). High school student's belief about maths, mathematical problem solving and theirachievement in maths: A cross sectional study. Educational Psychology, 23, (1).Maurer, H. (2002). What we have learnt in 15 years about educational multimedia.ED- MEDIA 2002, Denver, Colorado, AACE.Mazlini Adnan, Mohd Faizal Nizam Lee Abdullah, Marzita Puteh, Che Nizam Che Ahmad & Siti MistinaMaat. (2015). Pembangunan ModelSstruktural (SFM)) Kepercayaan, Persekitaran Pembelajaran,Gaya Pembelajaran dan Penca paian MatematikPe/ajar Sekolah Berprestasi Tinggi (SBT). UPSI. 2015Malmivouri, M. (2001). The dynamics of affect, cognition and social environment in the regulationof personal learning process: the case of mathematics. Research Report 172. Department ofEducation, University of Helsinki. http://ethesis.helsinki.fi/julkaisut/kas/kasva/vk/malmivouri/[30 Mac 2009].Michael Ben-Avie, Haynes, N.M., White, J., Ensign, J. Steinfeld, T. R., Sartin, L. D., & Squires,D.A. (2003). Youth development and student learning in Math and Science. In Jonathan Cohen (Ed.),How social and emotional development add up: Getting result in Math and Science education: NewYork.Mohd Majid Konting. (2000). Kaedah Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.Mohd Majid Konting. (2005). Kaedah Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.Mok Soon Sang. (2010). Penyelidikan Dalam Pendidikan Perancangan dan Pelaksanaan PenyelidikanTindakan. Penerbitan Multimedia Sdn. Bhd.Mok Soon Sang. (2012). Prinsip teras pengajaran & pembelajaran 1.Puchong: Penerbitan Multimedia.Moscucci, M. (2007). About mathematical belief 307.systems awareness. CERME 5, 298-National Research Council and The Institute0f Medicine, USA. (2004). Engaging School: FosteringHigh School Students' Motivation to Learn. Board on Children, Youth and Families, Divisions ofBehavioral and Social Science and Education, Washington D. C: The National Academic Press.Noraini Idris. (2005). Pedagogi dalam pendidikan matematik. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications &Distributions Sdn. Bhd.Nik Azis Nik Pa. (2003). Syarahan Perdana Universiti Malaya: Mathematics Education in Malaysia in21st Century. Hopes and Challenges 2003.Nik Azis Nik Pa. (2008). Isu-isu Kritikal dalam Pendidikan Matematik (edisi pertama). Kuala Lumpur:Penerbit Universiti Malaya.Noraini Idris. (2005). Pedagogi dalam Pendidikan Matematik. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications andDistributors Sdn. Bhd.Nursuhaili Baharuddin. (2010). Hubungan antara kemahiran sosial dengan tingkah laku sosial dalamkalangan kanak-kanak prasekolah di Tabika Kemas Beaufort. Thesis Sarjana. Universiti MalaysiaSabah.Pajares, F. & Miller, M. D. (1994). Role of self-eeficacy and self-concept beliefs in mathematicalproblem solving : a path analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology. 86(2): 143-203.Pallant, J. (2010). SPSS sun,ival manual: a step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS.Maidenhead: Open University Press/McGraw-Hill.Pehkonen, E., & Tomer, G. (1996). Mathematical beliefs and different aspects of their meaning.International Reviews on Mathematical Education (=ZDM). 28(4):101-108.Piaget, J. (1965). The child's conception of number. New York: Humanities Press.Quek Miow Leng. (2006). Hubungan Antara Sikap, Minat, Pengajaran Guru danPengaruh Rakan Sebaya dengan Pencapaian Matematik Di Kalangan Pe/ajarTingkatan Empat di Daerah Batu Pahat, Johor. Tesis PhD. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Johor.Op't Eynde, P, De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (2002). Framing students' mathematics-relatedbeliefs. Dlm. G.C. Leder, E. Pehkonen & G. Tomer (pnyt.). Belief'}: A Hidden Variable inMathematics Education, (ms. 13-37). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Op't Eynde, P., & DeCorte, E. (2003). Students' mathematics-related belief system: Design andanalysis of a questionare. Kertas kerja dibentangkan di "The Annual Meeting of the AmericanEducational Research Association, Chicago, IL.Oros, E. (2000). The interest and difficulty of the mathematical problems as pupils belief inHungary. Dim S. Gotz & G. Torner (pynt.), Research on mathematical beliefs. Proceeding of theMAVI-9 European Workshop, 74-78.Randel, B., Stevenson, H. W., & Witruk, E. (2000). Attitudes, beliefs and mathematics achievementof German and Japenese high school students.International Journal f Behavioral Development, 24(2), 190-198.Raymond, A. M. (1997). Inconsistency between a beginning elementary school teacher's mathematicsbeliefs and teaching practice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 550 - 576Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. Dim. J. Sikula(pnyt.). Handbook of Research on Teacher Education, hlm.102-119. New York: Macmillan.Rodiah Ahmad. (2008). Pengajaran Guru, Persekiatran Pembelajaran dan Sikap Murid dalam Pembelajaran KOMSAS. Tesis Program Sarjana Pendidikan(Tidak Diterbitkan). Pulau Pinang. Universiti Sains Malaysia.Rohaila Yusof, Norasmah Othman & Faridah Karim. (2005). Strategi pembelajaran pengalamanberasaskan Model Kolb dalam pendidikan perakaunan. Journal Pendidikan Malaysia, 30(1), 113-128.Rohani Abdullah. (2001). Perkembangan Kanak-kanak penilalain cecara portfolio.Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia.Roslina Radzali. (2007). Kepercayaan matematik, metakognisi, perwakilan masalah dan penyelesaianmasalah matematik dalam kalangan pelajar. (Tesis Doktor Falsafah yang tidak diterbitkan).Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. BangiRoslina Radzali, T. Subahan Mohd Meerah & Effandi Zakaria. (2010). Hubungan antara kepercayaanmatematik, metakognisi dan perwakilan masalah dengan kejayaan penyelesaian masalah matematik.Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia. 35(2), 1-7Roulet, G. (2000). Exemplerary mathematics teachers; Subjects conceptions and instructionalpractices. Philosophy of Mathematics Education Journal, 13.Sabitha Merican. (2006). Kaedah penyelidikan sains social. Petaling Jaya: Prectice HallSabri Ahmad, Tengku Zawawi Tengku zainal & aziz Omar. (2006). Isu-isu dalam pendidikan matematik.Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications & Distributors Sdn. Bhd.Salleh Abd Rashid. (2003). Pemikiran Profesional Keguruan Terhadap Kurikulum dan Pengajaran.Dibentangkan di Seminar Pendidikan MPBL.Salhah Abdullah. (2009). Kecerdasan pelbagai: Aplikasi dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran. KualaLumpur: PTS Profesional Publishing Sdn. Bhd.Salina Hamed, Peridah Bahari & Abdul Ghani Kanesan Abdullah. (2009).Persekitaran pembelajaran matematik dan hubungan dengan pencapaian matematik. Co,?ference onScience & Social Research. 14-15 March 2009.Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando: Academic Press,Inc.Schommer-Aikins, M., Duell, 0. K. & Hutter, R. (2005). Epitemological beliefs, mathematicalproblem-solving beliefs and academic performance of middle school students. The elementary SchoolJournal. 105(3): 290-304.Shahabuddin Hashim & Rohizan Yaakub. (2003). Psikologi Pembelajaran dan Personaliti. Pahang.: PTSPublication & Distributor Sdn. Bhd.Shahvarani, A., & B. Savizi, (2007). Analyzing Some Iranian- High School Teachers' Beliefs onMathematics, Mathematics Learning and Mathematics Teaching.Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 2(2): 54-59.Siti Mistima Maat. (2011). Hubungan antara kepercayaan matematik, amalan pengajaran dan pengetahuanpedagogi ka.ndungan guru-guru matematik sekolah menengah. (Tesis Doktor Falsafah yang tidakditerbitkan). Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, BangiSiti Mistina & Effandi Zakaria. (2012). Sistem kepercayaan guru matematik. Jurnal Pendidikan Sainsdan Matematik Malaysia. UPSI 2012.Steyn, T., & Du Plessis, I. (2007). Competence in mathematics more than mathematicalskills?lnternational Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 38(7), 881-890.Szydlik, J.E. (2000). Mathematical beliefs and and conceptual understanding of the limit of afunction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31 (3), 258- 276.Tapia, M. & Marsh G. e. (2004). The relationship of math anxiety and gender.Academic Exchange Quarterly. 8(2): 130-134.Tella, A. (2007). The impact of motivation on students' academic achievement and learningoutcomes in mathematics among secondary school students in Nigeria. Eurasia Journal ofMathematis, Science & Technology Education.3(2): 149-156.Tessmer, M., & Harris, D. (1992). Analysing the instructional setting. New York.Kogan Page Limited.Ticha, M., & Baresova, M. (2000). Cultivation of student's and teacher's beliefs abaou mathematicseducation. Dim S. Gotz & G. Torner (pnyt), Research on Mathematical Beliefs. Proceeding of theMAVl-9 European Workshop, 96-102.Thompson, A. G. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of research Dlm. A.D.Grouws (pnyt). Handbook of Research on Mathemathics Teaching and Learning, him. 127-146. New York:Macmilllan.Thorndike, R. M., & Thorndike-Christ, T. (201 0). Measurement and evaluation inp. ychology and education (edisi Japan). Boston: Pearson Education.Tretter, T. R. (2003). Gifted students speak: Mathemathics problem-solving insights.Gifted Child Today Magazine.http://www.finclarticles.com/cf 0/m0HRV/3 26/1062904405/print.jhtVan der Sandt, S. (2007). Research Framework on Mathematics Teachers Behaviour: Koehler ang Grouws'Framework Revisited. Eurasia Journal o_fMathematics Science and Technology Education 3(4):343-350.Veal, W.R. (2004). Beliefs and knowledge in chemistry teacher development.International Journal o.f Science Education 26(3), 329-351.Velayutham, S., Aldridge, l & Afari, E. (2013). Students' Learning Enviroment, Motivation andSelf-Regulation: A Comparative Structural Equation Modeling Analysis. Dim.MS. Khine (ed),Application of Structural Equation Modeling in Educational research and Practice, 115-133: SensePublisher.Vygotsky , L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Woodard, T. (20044). The effects of math anxiety on post-secondary developmentalstudents as relatedto achievement, gender and age. Inquiry: 9(1), 1-5.Yu, H. (2008). A comparison of mathematics teachers' beliefs between England and China. Dim. MJoubert, (pnyt.). Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics,121-124.Zaidah Yazid. (2005). Pengetahuan pedagogical kandungan (PPK) guru matematik tambahanperpengalaman. Tesis Dr. Falsafah. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi.Zainudin Abu Bakar & Md. Shaharudin Kasri. (2010). Gaya pembelajaran dalam kalangan pelajartingkatan dua Sekolah Menengah Bukit Gambir dalam mata pelajaran Kemahiran Hidup. UniversitiTeknologi Malaysia. Retrieved from htt p://www.eprints .utm .my/10300 /2Zainudin Awang. (2013). Structural Equation Modelling Using Amos Graphic. Shah Alam: Penerbit UITMPress.Zailizan Mohd Jelas, Saemah Rahman, Roselan Baki & Jamil Ahmad. (2005).Prestasi Akademik mengikut Gender. Jurnal Pendidikan 30 (2005), 93-111. Universiti KebangsaanMalaysia. |