Development and the effect of mobile enthalpy game application on matriculation students achievement in thermochemical equation

Development and the effect of mobile enthalpy game application on matriculation students achievement in thermochemical equation

The purpose of this study is to develop a mobile enthalpy game application (MEGA)and study its effect on matriculation students achievement in writing thermochemical equations.MEGA is an Android game application developed for student to acquire skills to writethermochemical equations. It is develope...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Choo, Sze Yee
Format: thesis
Language:eng
Published: 2021
Subjects:
QD Chemistry
Online Access:https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6257
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:6257
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
collection UPSI Digital Repository
language eng
topic QD Chemistry
spellingShingle QD Chemistry
Choo, Sze Yee
Development and the effect of mobile enthalpy game application on matriculation students achievement in thermochemical equation
description The purpose of this study is to develop a mobile enthalpy game application (MEGA)and study its effect on matriculation students achievement in writing thermochemical equations.MEGA is an Android game application developed for student to acquire skills to writethermochemical equations. It is developed based on ADDIEs, Kwons and the game-based learningengineering models. MEGA was validated in terms of content, pedagogy and multimedia by usingCohens kappa agreement coefficient. Reliability of MEGA is determined by using the reliabilitycoefficient. This quantitative study employed time-series quasi experimental design involving36 students in the control group (PowerPoint slides) and 36 students in the experimental group(MEGA). Samples are chosen by using a simple random sampling technique. The effect of MEGA versusPowerPoint slides on student achievement of thermochemical equation were compared. Data wascollected by using a need analysis questionnaire, pre-tests, post- tests, game score sheets andevaluation forms. Data were analyzed descriptively by using percentage and inferentiallyusing t-test and Pearson correlation analysis. Findings showed the Cohens kappa agreement forcontent is 1.00, pedagogy is 1.00 and multimedia is 0.82. Meanwhile, the reliabilitycoefficient for MEGA is 0.71. Results showed there were no significant differences in pre-testscores between control and experimental groups. There were significant differences between pre andpost-test scores for control group and experimental group. There was also significant difference inthe post-test scores between control and experimental groups. In conclusion, MEGA could enhancestudents achievement in writing thermochemical equations compared to the PowerPoint slidepresentation. This study implies, in this era of Education 4.0,mobile game applications (MEGA) could promote gen Z learning of chemistry.
format thesis
qualification_name
qualification_level Master's degree
author Choo, Sze Yee
author_facet Choo, Sze Yee
author_sort Choo, Sze Yee
title Development and the effect of mobile enthalpy game application on matriculation students achievement in thermochemical equation
title_short Development and the effect of mobile enthalpy game application on matriculation students achievement in thermochemical equation
title_full Development and the effect of mobile enthalpy game application on matriculation students achievement in thermochemical equation
title_fullStr Development and the effect of mobile enthalpy game application on matriculation students achievement in thermochemical equation
title_full_unstemmed Development and the effect of mobile enthalpy game application on matriculation students achievement in thermochemical equation
title_sort development and the effect of mobile enthalpy game application on matriculation students achievement in thermochemical equation
granting_institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
granting_department Fakulti Sains dan Matematik
publishDate 2021
url https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6257
_version_ 1747833250917646336
spelling oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:62572021-09-15 Development and the effect of mobile enthalpy game application on matriculation students achievement in thermochemical equation 2021 Choo, Sze Yee QD Chemistry The purpose of this study is to develop a mobile enthalpy game application (MEGA)and study its effect on matriculation students achievement in writing thermochemical equations.MEGA is an Android game application developed for student to acquire skills to writethermochemical equations. It is developed based on ADDIEs, Kwons and the game-based learningengineering models. MEGA was validated in terms of content, pedagogy and multimedia by usingCohens kappa agreement coefficient. Reliability of MEGA is determined by using the reliabilitycoefficient. This quantitative study employed time-series quasi experimental design involving36 students in the control group (PowerPoint slides) and 36 students in the experimental group(MEGA). Samples are chosen by using a simple random sampling technique. The effect of MEGA versusPowerPoint slides on student achievement of thermochemical equation were compared. Data wascollected by using a need analysis questionnaire, pre-tests, post- tests, game score sheets andevaluation forms. Data were analyzed descriptively by using percentage and inferentiallyusing t-test and Pearson correlation analysis. Findings showed the Cohens kappa agreement forcontent is 1.00, pedagogy is 1.00 and multimedia is 0.82. Meanwhile, the reliabilitycoefficient for MEGA is 0.71. Results showed there were no significant differences in pre-testscores between control and experimental groups. There were significant differences between pre andpost-test scores for control group and experimental group. There was also significant difference inthe post-test scores between control and experimental groups. In conclusion, MEGA could enhancestudents achievement in writing thermochemical equations compared to the PowerPoint slidepresentation. This study implies, in this era of Education 4.0,mobile game applications (MEGA) could promote gen Z learning of chemistry. 2021 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6257 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6257 text eng closedAccess Masters Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Sains dan Matematik Adesoji, F.A., Omilani, N.A. & Dada, S.O. (2017). A comparison of perceived andactual; students learning difficulties in physical chemistry. International Journal of Brain andCognitive Sciences, 6(1), 1-8.Ahmad Abdullahi Ibrahim (2015). Comparative analysis between system approach, kemp, andassure instructional design models. International Journal of Education and Research, 3(12),261-270.Al-Emran, M., Elsherif, H. M., & Shaalan, K. (2016). Investigating attitudes towards the use ofmobile learning in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 93102.doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.033.Antunes, M., Pacheco, M. A. R., & Giovanela, M. (2012). Design and implementation of aneducational game for teaching chemistry in higher education. Journal of Chemical Education, 89(4), 517-521. Retrieved March 12, 2019 from https://search-proquestcom.ezpustaka2.upsi.edu.my/docview/935471472?accountid=13155.Ary, D., Jacobs, L.C., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to research in education.Canada: Nelson Education, Ltd.Atkinson, R., & Shiffrin, R. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes.Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 2, 89195. doi: 10.1016/s0079- 7421(08)60422-3.Aviles, M., & Eastman, J. K. (2012). Utilizing technology effectively to improve Gen Zs educationalperformance. Journal of International Education in Business, 5(2), 96113. doi:10.1108/18363261211281726.Aziz Hussin, A. (2018). Education 4.0 made simple: ideas for teaching. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 6(3), 9298.doi:10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.6n.3p.92.Baah, R., & Ampiah, J. G. (2012). Senior high school students' understanding anddifficulties with chemical equations. International Journal of Scientific, 5(3), 162- 170.Baah, R., & Anthony-Krueger, C. (2012). An investigation into senior high schoolstudents understanding and difficulties in writing chemical formulae of inorganic compounds. International Journal of Research Studies in Educational Technology,1(2).doi:10.5861/ijrset.2012.119.Baddeley, A.D. (2014). Essentials of human memory (Classic edition.). East Sussex:Psychology Press.Bae, J. H., & Kim, A. H. (2014). Design and development of Unity3D Game Engine-based smart SNG (Social Network Game). International Journal of Multimedia and UbiquitousEngineering, 9(8), 261266. doi: 10.14257/ijmue.2014.9.8.23Bajt, S. K. (2011). Web 2.0 technologies: Applications for community colleges. New Directions forCommunity Colleges, 2011(154), 5362. doi: 10.1002/cc.446Bartolom, A., Castaeda, L., & Adell, J. (2018). Personalisation in educationaltechnology: The absence of underlying pedagogies. International Journal of EducationalTechnology in Higher Education, 15(14), 1-17.Bashir, K. (2018). Understanding the role of user interface design in fostering students learningprocess in a multimedia courseware learning environment: Insights from a Malaysian case study.IIUM Journal of Educational Studies, 5(1), 93-109. doi: 10.31436/ijes.v5i1.148Ben-Zvi, R., Eylon, B.-S., & Silberstein, J. (1986). Is an atom of copper malleable?Journal of Chemical Education, 63(1), 64. doi:10.1021/ed063p64.Bloom, B.S., Engelhart, M.D., Furst, E.J., Hill, W.H.& Krathwohl, D.R. (1956). Taxanomyof Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals; Handbook I: CognitiveDomain. New York: David McKay Company, Inc.Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The addie approach. New York: Springer.Branch, R. M., & Gustafson, K. L. (1998). Re-visioning models of instructionaldevelopment.UK: Upper Saddle River.Branch, R. M., & Merrill, M. D. (2002). Characteristics of instructional design models. In R.A.Reiser, & J.V. Dempsey, (2012), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (3?? ed.,pp. 816). Boston, United State of America: Pearson.Brumberger, E. (2011). Visual literacy and the digital native: An examination of the Gen Z learner. Journal of Visual Literacy, 30(1), 1947. doi:10.1080/23796529.2011.11674683.Cahyana, U., Paristiowati, M., & Fauziyah, S. (2018). Development of Android-Based Mobile learningmedia on atomic structure and periodic table. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 434(1), doi:10.1088/1757- 899x/434/1/012095.Cai, S., Wang, X., & Chiang, F.-K. (2014). A case study of augmented realitysimulation system application in a chemistry course. Computers in Human Behavior, 37,3140. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.018.Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designsfor research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Carr, N. G. (2011). The shallows: What the Internet is doing to our brains. New York:W.W. Norton.Chandrasegaran, A. L., Treagust, D. F., & Mocerino, M. (2007). The development of atwo-tier multiple-choice diagnostic instrument for evaluating secondary school studentsability to describe and explain chemical reactions using multiple levels of representation.Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(3), 293-307. doi:10.1039/b7rp90006f.Chandrasegaran, A. L., Treagust, D. F., & Mocerino, M. (2009). Emphasizing multiple levels ofrepresentation to enhance students understandings of the changes occurring during chemicalreactions. Journal of Chemical Education, 86(12), 1433- 1436, doi:10.1021/ed086p1433.Cheon, J., Lee, S., Crooks, S. M., & Song, J. (2012). An investigation of mobilelearning readiness in higher education based on the theory of planned behavior. Computers &Education, 59(3), 1054-1064. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.015.Cheong, C., Filippou, J & Cheong, F. (2014). Towards the gamification of learning: Investigatingstudent perceptions of game elements. Journal of Information Systems Education, 25(3), 233-244.Chu, H., & Hung, C. (2015). Effects of the digital game-development approach onelementary school students learning motivation, problem solving, and learning achievement.International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 13(1), 87- 102.doi:10.4018/ijdet.2015010105.Chua, Y. P. (2014). Kaedah penyelidikan. Kuala Lumpur: McGraw-Hill.Clark, D. B., Tanner-Smith, E. E., & Killingsworth, S. S. (2016). Digital games, design, and learning. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 79-122.doi:10.3102/0034654315582065.Clark, R. C., Sweller, J. 1., & Nguyen, F. 1. (2006). Efficiency in learning: Evidence- basedguidelines to manage cognitive load. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational andPsychological Measurement, 20(1), 3746. doi:10.1177/001316446002000104Cojocariu, V., & Boghian, I. (2014). Teaching the relevance of game-based learning to preschool andprimary teachers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 142, 640646.doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.679.Cresswell, J. W. (2008). Education research: Planning, conducting, and evaluatingquantitative and qualitative research. United States of America: Pearson Education,Inc.Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluatingquantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson.Crimmins, M. T., & Midkiff, B. (2017). High structure active learning pedagogy for the teaching oforganic chemistry: Assessing the impact on academic outcomes. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(4), 429438. doi: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00663Crompton, H. (2013). A historical overview of mobile learning: Toward learner- centerededucation. In Z. L. Berge, & L. Y. Muilenburg (Eds.), Handbook of mobile learning (pp. 314).Florence, KY: Routledge.Da Silva Jnior, J. N., Nobre, D. J., Do Nascimento, R. S., Torres, G. S., Leite, A. J. M.,Monteiro, A. J., Rojo, M. J. (2018). Interactive computer game that engages students inreviewing organic compound nomenclature. Journal of Chemical Education, 95, 899902.doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00793Damo, K. L., & Prudente, M. S. (2019). Investigating students attitude and achievement in organicchemistry using interactive application. Proceedings of the 10th International Conferenceon E-Education, E-Business, E-Management and E- Learning - IC4E 19, 10-13 January, New York, United State, doi:10.1145/3306500.3306562.Dangur, V., Avargil, S., Peskin, U. & Dori, J. Y. (2014). Learning quantum chemistry via visual-conceptual approach: Students bidirectional textual and visual understanding,Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15, 297310. doi: 10.1039/C4RP00025K.Daubenfeld, T., & Zenker, D. (2015). A game-based approach to an entire physical chemistry course. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(2), 269-277.doi:10.1021/ed5001697.Dekhane, S., & Tsoi, M. Y. (2012). Designing a mobile application for conceptualunderstanding. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 4(3), 34-52.doi:10.4018/jmbl.2012070103.DiGiuseppe, M., Partosoedarso, E., Van Oostveen, R., & Desjardins, F. J. (2013).Exploring competency development with mobile devices. In M. B. Nunes & M. McPherson (Eds.),International Association for Development of the information society (IADIS) internationalconference on e-learning (pp. 384388). Prague: International Association for Development ofthe Information Society.Driscoll, A., Jicha, K., Hunt, A. N., Tichavsky, L., & Thompson, G. (2012). Can online courses deliver in-class results?A comparison of student performance and satisfaction in anonline versus a face-to-face Introductory Sociology Course. Teaching Sociology, 40(4),312331. doi: 10.1177/0092055X12446624Eggen, P. D., & Kauchak, D. (2010). Educational psychology. Upper Saddle River, NJ:Merrill.El-Hussein, M. O. M., & Cronje, J. C. (2010). Defining mobile learning in the highereducation landscape. Educational Technology & Society, 13(3), 1221.Embong, A. M., Noor, A. M., Hashim, H. M., Ali, R. M., & Shaari, Z. H. (2012). E- books astextbooks in the classroom. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 18021809. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.903Erhel, S., & Jamet, E. (2013). Digital game-based learning: Impact of instructions and feedback onmotivation and learning effectiveness. Computers & Education, 67, 156-167.doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.019.Euis Nursaadah, Liliasari Liliasari., & Ahmad Mudzakir (2017). Teachinglearning sequence: Designing ionic bonding concept through model of educational reconstruction. In H. S.H. M. Ade Gafar Abdullah, Ida Hamidah, Siti Aisyah, Ari Arifin Danuwijaya, Galuh Yuliani (Ed.),Ideas for 21st Century Education (1st ed., pp. 913). doi:10.1201/9781315166575-2Faghih, B., Azadehfar, M. R., & Katebi, S. D. (2013). User interface design for e-learning software. The International Journal of Soft Computing and Software Engineering,3(3), 786794. doi:10.7321/jscse.v3.n3.119Feil, J., & Scattergood, M. (2005). Beginning game level design. Boston, MA: ThomsonCourse Technology.Fox, L. J., & Roehrig, G. H. (2015). Nationwide survey of the undergraduate physical chemistry course. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(9), 14561465.doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00070.Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2003). How to design and evaluate research ineducation. New York: McGraw-Hill.Franco-Mariscal, A., Oliva-Martnez, J. M., & Gil, M. L. A. (2015). Students'perceptions about the use of educational games as a tool for teaching the periodic table ofelements at the high school level. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(2), 278-285. Retrieved April 23, 2019, from https://search-proquest.com.ezpustaka2.upsi.edu.my/docview/1655583222?accountid=13155.Frankfort-Nachmias, C. & Nachmias, D. (1996). Research methods in the social sciences.London: Arnold.Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., & Gall, J. P. (2007). Educational research: An introduction.Boston: Pearson.Gao, F., Li, L., & Sun, Y. (2020). A systematic review of mobile game-based learning in STEMeducation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(2020), 1791-1827. doi:10.1007/s11423-020-09787-0.Gilbert, J. K., & Treagust, D. (2010). Multiple representations in chemical education.Dordrecht: Springer.Giannakas, F., Kambourakis, G., Papasalouros, A., & Gritzalis, S. (2017). A critical review of 13years of mobile game-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(2),341384. doi:10.1007/s11423-017-9552-zGoyal, A. (2018). Best Android game development platforms and tools in 2019. RetrievedJanuary 21, 2020, from https://www.endivesoftware.com/blog/android-game-development-platforms-and-tools/Grimshaw, M. N., Tan, S.-L., & Lipscomb, S. D. (2013). Playing with sound: The role of music andsound effects in gaming. In S.-L. Tan, A. Cohen, S. D. Lipscomb, &R. A. Kendall (Eds.), Psychology of music in multimedia (pp. 289314). United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199608157.001.0001.Gupta, T. (2019). Game-based learning in chemistry: A game for chemicalnomenclature. ACS Symposium Series, 1318, 6579. doi: 10.1021/bk-2019- 1318.ch005Hafsah Taha, Rosnani Hashim., Zurida Ismail., Kamaruzaman Jusoff., & Khoo, Y.Y. (2014). Theinfluence of students concept of mole, problem representation ability and mathematical ability onstoichiometry problem solving. Scottish Journal of Arts, Social Sciences and Scientific Studies,21(1), 3-21.Hallowell, E., & Ratey, J. (2011). Driven to distraction: Recognizing and coping with attentiondeficit disorder. New York: Anchor Books.Hamari, J., Shernoff, D. J., Rowe, E., Coller, B., Asbell-Clarke, J., & Edwards, T.(2016). Challenging games help students learn: An empirical study on engagement, flow and immersionin game-based learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 170179. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.045Hanghj, T., & Brund, C.E. (2010). Teacher Roles and Positionings in relation toeducational games. ECGBL- 4th European Conference on Games Based Learning- Copenhagen, (21-22 october 2010), Denmark.Hanus, M. D., & Fox, J. (2015). Assessing the effects of gamification in the classroom: Alongitudinal study on intrinsic motivation, social comparison, satisfaction, effort, and academic performance. Computers and Education, 80, 152161. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.019Harkins, A. M. (2008). Leapfrog principles and practices: Core components of Education3.0 and 4.0. Future Research Quality, 21(1), 19-31.Haryanto, E. (2012). Listening to students voice: A survey of implementation of Englishas medium of instruction in an international standard school in Indonesia,Journal of Education and Practice, 3(15), 111-119.Hasiah Mohamed, Nora Yanti Che Jan, & Nik Marsyahariani Nik Daud. (2010).Exposure of computer games among students in Malaysia: Case study of computer science students inUITM Terengganu. Computer and Information Science, 3(1), 144-151. doi:10.5539/cis.v3n1p144.Heale, R., & Twycross, A. (2015). Validity and reliability in quantitative studies.Evidence Based Nursing, 18(3), 6667. doi:10.1136/eb-2015-102129.Hodges, G. W., Wang, L., Lee, J., Cohen, A., & Jang, Y. (2018). An exploratory study of blendingthe virtual world and the laboratory experience in secondary chemistry classrooms. Computers and Education, 122, 179-193.doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.003.Hoffman, B., & Nadelson, L. (2009). Motivational engagement and video gaming: A mixed methodsstudy. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(3), 245-270.doi:10.1007/s11423-009-9134-9.Holmes, V. (2012). New digital energy game, the use of games to influence attitudes, interests, andstudent achievement in science. Retrieved March 13, 2020, from thehttps://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED536550.pdfHuizenga, J., Ten Dam, G., Voogt, J., & Admiraal,W. (2017). Teacher perceptions of the value ofgame-based learning in secondary education. Computers & Education, 110, 105115. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.03.008.Hung, C. Y., Sun, J. C. Y., & Yu, P. T. (2015). The benefits of a challenge: Student motivationand flow experience in tablet-PC-game-based learning. Interactive Learning Environments,23(2), 172190. doi:10.1080/10494820.2014.997248Hussin, S., Manap, M. R., Amir, Z., & Krish, P. (2012). Mobile learning readiness among Malaysianstudents at higher learning institutes. Asian Social Science, 8(12), 276283.doi:10.5539/ass.v8n12p276Hwang, W. Y., Shih, T. K., Ma, Z. H., Shadiev, R., & Chen, S. Y. (2016). Evaluating listening andspeaking skills in a mobile game-based learning environment with situational contexts. ComputerAssisted Language Learning, 29(4), 639657. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2015.1016438Isa, Z., Zakaria, A. M., Azlan, M. I., Noorani, M. S. M., Majid, N., Ismail, H., Ahmad, A. G. (2011). Students perceptions of the implementation of teaching and learning ofscience and mathematics in English. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 18, 361366.doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.05.051Jaber, L. Z., & Boujaoude, S. (2012). A macromicrosymbolic teaching to promote relationalunderstanding of chemical reactions. International Journal of Science Education, 34(7),973998. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2011.569959.Jackson, S. L. (2006). Research methods and statistics. Mason, OH: Cengage Learning.Jamaludin, R. (2000). Multimedia dalam pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: UtusanPublications & Distributors.Jarvin, L. (2015). Edutainment, games, and the future of education in a digital world. NewDirections for Child and Adolescent Development, 2015(147), 33-40. doi: 10.1002/cad.20082.Johnstone, A. H. (1991). Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem.Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7(2), 75-83. doi:10.1111/j.1365- 2729.1991.tb00230.x.Jones, S. (2010). Transnational learning and collaboration in delivering MBA programs in emergingmarkets: The challenge of national culture. In S. Mukerji & T. Tripathi (Ed.), Cases ontransnational learning and technologically enabled environments (pp.50-64). New York, Hershey:Information Science Reference.Jones, O. A. H., Spichkova, M., & Spencer, M. J. S. (2018). Chirality-2: Development of amultilevel mobile gaming app to support the teaching of introductory undergraduate-levelorganic chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(7), 1216-1220.doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00856.Karacop, A., & Doymus, K. (2013). Effects of jigsaw cooperative learning and animationtechniques on students understanding of chemical bonding and their conceptions of theparticulate nature of matter. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22, 186-203.doi:10.1007/s10956-012-9385-9.Kavak, N. (2012). ChemOkey: A game to reinforce nomenclature. Journal of Chemical Education, 89(8),10471049. doi:10.1021/ed3000556Kebritchi, M. (2010). Factors affecting teachers adoption of educational computer games:A case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 256270.doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00921.x.Kergroach, S. (2017). Industry 4.0: New challenges and opportunities for the labour market. Foresight and STI Governance, 11(4), 68. doi: 10.17323/2500- 2597.2017.4.6.8.Kern, A. L., Wood, N. B., Roehrig, G. H., & Nyachwaya, J. (2010). A qualitative report of the wayshigh school chemistry students attempt to represent a chemical reaction at the atomic/molecularlevel. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 11, 165-172. doi:10.1039/c005465h.Khan, B. (2012). User Interface design for virtual environments:Challenges and advances. Hershey:McWeadon Education.Khan, A., Ahmad, F. H., & Malik, M. M. (2017). Use of digital game-based learning and gamificationin secondary school science: The effect on student engagement, learning and gender difference.Education and Information Technologies, 22(6),2767-2804. doi:10.1007/s10639-017-9622-1.Kibirige, I., Osodo, J., & Tlala, K. M. (2014). The effect of predict-observe-explainstrategy on learners misconceptions about dissolved salts. Mediterranean Journal of SocialSciences, 5(4), 300310. doi:10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n4p300Kim, B. (2015). Chapter 3: Game mechanics, dynamics, and aesthetics. Library TechnologyReports, 51(2), 17-19.Kim, B., Park, H., & Baek. (2009). Not just fun, but serious strategy: Using metacognitive strategies in game-based learning. Computers and Education, 52(4), 800- 810.Kozma, R. B., & Russell, J. (1997). Multimedia and understanding: Expert and novice responses todifferent representations of chemical phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(9), 949-968. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199711)34:93.0.CO;2-U.Krathwohl, D.R., Bloom, B.S., & Masia, B.B. (1964). Taxanomy of Education Objectives:Handbook II. Affective Domain. New York: David McKay Company, Inc.Kulkarni, V. D., Tambade, P. S. (2013). Enhancing the learning of Thermodynamics using computerassisted instructions at undergraduate level. International Journal of Physics and ChemistryEducation, 5(1), 2-10.Kumren, A., & Lee, C. N. (2009). Q & A for matriculation chemistry: Semester 2updated. Selangor: Oxford Fajar.Kwon, J. (2012). The development of educational and/or training computer games for students withdisabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 48(2), 8798. doi: 10.1177/1053451212449738.Lau, K. P., & Chang, R. (2005). Physical chemistry for matriculation (Rev. ed.). Kuala Lumpur:McGraw-Hill.Lee, J. J., & Hammer, J. (2011). Gamification in education: What, how, why bother?Academic Exchange Quarterly, 15, 146151.Lee, T.T. (2013). Pembinaan dan kerberkesanan modul multimedia interaktif dengan agen pedagogidalam pembelajaran elektrokimia, (Unpublished doctorate thesis), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia,Bangi, Selangor.Leinonen, T., Keune, A., Veermans, M., & Toikkanen, T. (2014). Mobile apps forreflection in learning: A design research in K-12 education. British Journal ofEducational Technology, 47(1), 184202.doi:10.1111/bjet.12224.Libman, D., & Huang, L. (2013). Chemistry on the go: Review of chemistry apps on smartphones. Journal of Chemical Education, 90(3), 320-325.doi:10.1021/ed300329e.Ling, T. M., Zaharah Aiyub., Brown, W. H., Foote, C. S., Masterton, W. L., & Hurley,C. N. (2013). Chemistry: For matriculation. Petaling Jaya, Selangor: Cangage LearningAsia.Loh, K. K., & Kanai, R. (2016). How has the internet reshaped human cognition? The Neuroscientist,22(5), 506520. doi:10.1177/1073858415595005.Matriculation Division. (2017). Mision Matriculation education in Malaysia. Retrieved on Mac 20,2019, from https://www.moe.gov.my/index.php/my/korporat/jabatan- dan-bahagian/bahagian-matrikulasi.Matriculation Division. (2018). Curriculum specifications chemistry (SK025). Kuala Lumpur:Matriculation Division.Mayer, R. E. (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York: University ofCambridge.Mayer, R. E., & Johnson, C. I. (2010). Adding instructional features that promotelearning in a game-like environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 42(3), 241265.doi:10.2190/ec.42.3.a.Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commision. (2017). Hand phone users survey 2017.Cyberjaya: Malaysia Communication and multimedia commission.Merchant, Z., Goetz, E. T., Cifuentes, L., Keeney-Kennicutt, W., & Davis, T. J. (2014).Effectiveness of virtual reality-based instruction on students learning outcomes in K-12and higher education: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 70, 2940.doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.033Milenkovi?, D. D., Segedinac, M. D., & Hrin, T. N. (2014). Increasing high school students chemistry performance and reducing cognitive load through an instructional strategybased on the interaction of multiple levels of knowledge representation. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(9), 14091416. doi:10.1021/ed400805p.Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity forprocessing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81-97.Mills, G. E., Gay, L. R., & Airasian, P. W. (2011). Educational research: Competencies for analysisand applications. United States: Pearson.Mimi Marzziana Hamzah. (2017). Analisis pencapaian dan tahap motivasi pelajar menggunakankoswer friend rescue game bagi tajuk asid dan bes. (Unpublished Master dissertation). UniversitiPendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjung Malim, Perak.Ministry of Education. (2005). Curriculum specifications chemistry form 4. Retrieved April 22, 2019, from http://www.stsimon.edu.my/mn/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/hsp_chemistry_f4.pdf.Ministry of Education. (2013). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025. Putrajaya:Ministry of Education.Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (1999). Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role ofmodality and contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 358 368.doi:10.1037/0022-0663.91.2.358.Muliati Sedek, Yusri Abdullah, Jazihan Mahat, & Norafaizuryana Zainal (2011). Individualcharacteristic in online gaming and mobile application use among students in highereducation institution: A confirmatory factor analysis. Prosiding Seminar Majlis Dekan-DekanPendidikan Institusi Pendidikan Tinggi Awam, 1(1), 992-1005, Serdang, Universiti Putra Malaysia.Muhd Ibrahim Muhamad Damanhuri, Kumar, L. D. P., Mohamad Termizi Borhan, Siti shamsiah Sani, &Hafsah Taha (2019). Evaluation of jigsaw puzzles in writing the chemical formula of ionic compoundsamong the 10th grade students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1156, 012029. doi:10.1088/1742- 6596/1156/1/012029Mulop, N., Yusof, K. M., & Tasir, Z. (2012). A review on enhancing the teaching and learning ofthermodynamics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 56, 703 712.doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.706Naah, B. M., & Sanger, M. J. (2012). Investigating students understanding of thedissolving process. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(2), 103112.doi:10.1007/s10956-012-9379-7.Naik, N. (2014). A comparative evaluation of game-based learning: Digital or non- digital games?Paper presented at the European Conference on Games Based Learning; 2, 9-10 October 2014,Berlin, 437-445. Retrieved April 13, 2019, from https://search-proquest-com.ezpustaka2.upsi.edu.my/docview/1674245527?accountid=13155.Nik Syaharudin Nik Daud, Mohd Mustamam Abd Karim, Siti Wan Noraini Wan Hassan, &Nurulhuda Abdul Rahman (2015). Misconception and difficulties in Introductory Physics amonghigh school and university students: An overview in mechanics. Journal of Science, Mathematics andTechnology, 2(1), 3447.Noor Azman Othman, Mas Anom Abdul Rashid, Ida Rosnita Ismail, Saifulrizan Norizan,Sarah Artiqah Mohamad Saad. (2019). Debunking Gen Z learning style: Malaysian chapter.International Journal of Advanced Research in Technology and Innovation, 1(2), 1-7. Retrieved January 11, 2020 fromhttp://myjms.moe.gov.my/index.php/ijarti/article/view/6820.Norehan Ali. (2015). Pembangunan dan penilaian keberkesanan perisian multimedia paian muridbermasalah pendengaran dalam mata pelajaran Pembantu Penyedia Makanan. (Unpublished master dissertation). UniversitiPendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjong Malim, Perak.Nyachwaya, J. M. (2012). College students understanding of the particulate nature of matteracross reaction the particulate nature of matter across reaction types. Retrieved February15, 2020 from http://hdl.handle.net/11299/129692.Nyachwaya, J. M., & Wood, N. B. (2014). Evaluation of chemical representations in physicalchemistry textbooks. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15(4), 720728.doi:10.1039/c4rp00113c.Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2004). Cognitive Load Theory: Instructionalimplications of the interaction between information structures and cognitive architecture. Instructional Science, 32(1/2), 18. doi:10.1023/b:truc.0000021806.17516.d0.Paas, F. G., Van Merrinboer, J. J., & Adam, J. J. (1994). Measurement of cognitive load in instructional research. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79, 419-430 .doi:10.2466/pms.1994.79.1.419.Peters, V., Vissers, G., & Heijne, G. (1998). The validity of games. Simulation and Gaming, 29(1),2030. doi:10.1177/1046878198291003Ping, G. L., Lok, C., Yeat, T. W., Cherynn, T. J., & Tan, E. S. (2018). Are chemistry educationalapps useful? A quantitative study with three in-house apps. Chemistry Education Research andPractice, 19(1), 15-23. doi:10.1039/c7rp00094d.Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. Place of publication notidentified: Marc Prensky.Prensky, M. (2012). From digital immigrants and digital natives to digital wisdom.Innovate, 5(3), 19. http://marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky-Intro_to_From_DN_to_DW.pdf.Pritchard, A. (2014). Ways of learning: Learning theories and learning styles in the classroom (3??ed.). Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Proctor, M. D., & Marks, Y. (2013). A survey of exemplar teachers' perceptions, use, and accessof computer-based games and technology for classroom instruction. Journal of Computers & Education, 62, 171-180.doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.022.Qian, Y.F. (2009). An investigation of current online educational game. In R.E. Ferdig, (Eds.),Handbook of research on effective electronic gaming in education (pp. 67- 82). Hershey, PA:Information Science Reference.Ramadan, R., & Widyani, Y. (2013). Game development life cycle guidelines. 2013 International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and Information Systems, ICACSIS 2013, 28-29 September 2013, Bali, Indonesia.,doi:10.1109/ICACSIS.2013.6761558Ramnarain, U., & Joseph, A. (2012). Learning difficulties experienced by grade 12South African students in the chemical representation of phenomena. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 13(4),462470. doi: 10.1039/c2rp20071fRastegarpour, H., & Marashi, P. (2012). The effect of card games and computer games on learning ofchemistry concepts. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 597-601.doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.111.Richey, R. C. (1997). Research on instructional development. Educational Technology Research andDevelopment, 45(3), 91100. doi:10.1007/bf02299732.Richey, R. C. & Klein, J. D. (2007). Design and development research. New Jersey: LawrenceErlbaum Associates, Inc.Romiyatun, D. (2014). Developing mobile game brainchemist as senior high school/islamic seniorhigh school chemistry learning media in the topics of solubility, solubility product. Research inEducation Technology, Pedagogy & Technology, 8(1), 7385.Rothman, D. (2014). A tsunami of learners called Generation Z. Public Safety: A State of Mind,1(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2.Rubijesmin Abdul Latif (2007). Understanding Malaysian students as gamers:Experience. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Digital InteractiveMedia in Entertainment and Arts - DIMEA 07., 19-21 September 2007, Perth, Western Australia.doi:10.1145/1306813.1306843Ryan, L. (2000). Advanced chemistry for you. United Kingdom: Nelson Thornes.Salem, K., & Zimmerman, E. (2004). Rules of play: Game design fundamentals. MIT Press: Cambridge,MA.Sanchez, J. M. P. (2017). Integrated macro-micro-symbolic approach in teaching secondaryChemistry. Kimika, 28(2), 2229. doi:10.26534/kimika.v28i2.22-29Snchez-Mena, A., & Mart-Parreo, J. (2017). Drivers and barriers to adoptinggamification: Teachers perspectives. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 15(5), 434-443.Sanger, M. (2005). Evaluating students conceptual understanding of balancedequations and stoichiometric ratios using a particulate drawing. Journal Chemical Education, 82(1), 131134.Sreenivasulu & Subramaniam. (2013). University students understanding of chemical thermodynamics.International Journal of Science Education, 35(4), 601-635.doi:10.1080/09500693.2012.683460Seels, B. B., & Richey, R. C. (1994). Instructional technology: The definition anddomains of the field. Washington, DC: Association for EducationalCommunications and Technology.Shahroom, A. & Hussin, N. (2018). Industrial revolution 4.0 and education.International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(9), 314-319.Shatto, B., & Erwin, K. (2016). Moving on from Gen Zs: Preparing for Generation Z. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 47(6), 253-254.doi:10.3928/00220124-20160518-05.Simpson, E.J. (1972). The classification of educational objectives in the psychomotor Domain.Washington DC: Gryphon House.Simpson, J. M., & Elias, V. L. (2011). Choices and chances. Teaching Sociology, 39(1), 42-56.doi:10.1177/0092055x10390646.Singhatanadgid, P. & Sripakagorn, A. (2012). Experience and student feedback from teaching withguided slides on a tablet PC. ASEAN Journal of Engineering Education, 1(1), 2535.Skalski, P., & Whitbred, R. (2010). Image versus sound: A comparison of formal featureeffects on presence and video game enjoyment. PsychNology Journal, 8(1), 6784.Slavin, R.E. (1996). Education for all. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.Slavin, R. E. (2015). Educational psychology: Theory and practice. New Jersey: Pearson.Smaldino, S.E., Lowther, D.L., & Russell, J.D. (2008). Instructional technology and media forlearning, (9th Ed). Upper Saddle River, N.J: Pearson/Merrill/Prentice Hall.Smaldone, R. A., Thompson, C. M., Evans, M., & Voit, W. (2016). Teaching science through videogames. Nature Chemistry, 9(2), 97102. doi:10.1038/nchem.2694Snowman, J., & McCown, R. R. (2015). Psychology applied to teaching. Australia: Cengage learning.Soegoto, H. (2019). Smartphone usage among college students. Journal of Engineering Science andTechnology, 14(3), 12481259.Sousa Lima, M. A., Monteiro, . C., Melo Leite Junior, A. J., De Andrade Matos, I. S., Alexandre,F. S. O., Nobre, D. J., Da Silva Jnior, J. N. (2019). Game-based application for helpingstudents review chemical nomenclature in a fun way.Journal of Chemical Education, 96, 801805. doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00540Srisawasdi, N., & Panjaburee, P. (2018). Implementation of game-transformed inquiry-based learning to promote the understanding of and motivation to learnchemistry. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28(2), 152-164.doi:10.1007/s10956-018-9754-0.Stallings, W. (2018). Operating systems: Internals and design principles. Harlow: Pearson.Stefanova, C., Bob, Vadim, Chua, A., Yatendra, Sandy, Ikin, R., Rohit, Reza, Poul, Yusuf. (2018).Top 15 mobile game engines & development platforms / tools in 2019. Retrieved February 6, 2020,from https://thetool.io/2018/mobile-game- development-platformsSung, E., & Mayer, R. E. (2012). When graphics improve liking but not learning from online lessons. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2012), 16181625.doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.03.026Suresh Kumar Joseph. (2012). The usage of digital games in learning biology among form fourstudents in Malaysia. (Unpublished master thesis). Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, TanjungMalim, Perak.Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design.Learning and Instruction, 4(4), 295312. doi:10.1016/0959-4752(94)90003-5.Sweller, J. (2010). Element interactivity and intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review, 22(2), 123138. doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9128-5.Sweller, J., Merrinboer, J. J. G. V., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive architecture andinstructional design: 20 years later. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 261 292. doi:10.1007/s10648-019-09465-5.Talanquer, V. (2010). Macro, submicro, and symbolic: The many faces of the chemistry triplet. International Journal of Science Education, 33(2), 179195. doi:10.1080/09500690903386435.Tan, W. H. (2015). Gamifikasi dalam pendidikan pembelajaran berasaskan permainan.Tanjong Malim: Penerbit Universiti Sultan Idris.Tan, Y. T., & Shamuganathan, S. (2015). Chemistry for matriculation: Semester 2.Shah Alam, Selangor: Oxford Fajar.Taskin, V. & Bernholt, S. (2014) Students' understanding of chemical formulae: A reviewof empirical research. International Journal of Science Education, 36(1), 157-185, doi:10.1080/09500693.2012.744492.Tessmer, M., & Wedman, J. F. (1990). A layers-of-necessity instructional development model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 38(2), 7785.doi:10.1007/BF02298271Traxler, J., & Wishart, J. (2011). Making mobile learning work: Case studies of practice.Bristol: ESCalate.Triboni, E., & Weber, G. (2018). MOL: Developing a European-style board game to teach organicchemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(5), 791-803. Retrieved on March 10, 2019, from https://search-proquest-com.ezpustaka2.upsi.edu.my/docview/2093490951?accountid=13155.Tsai, F., Tsai, C., & Lin, K. (2015). The evaluation of different gaming modes and feedback types on game-based formative assessment in an online learning environment. Journal Computers & Education, 81, 259-269.doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.013.Vaughan, T. (2014). Multimedia making it work. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.Wan Fatimah Wan Ahmad, & Nabil Fikri Abdul Rahman.(2014). AKAMIA: Chemistrymobile game-based tutorial. 2014 3?? International Conference on User Science and Engineering(i-USEr), 2-5 September 2014, Shah Alam, Malaysia. doi:10.1109/iuser.2014.7002706.Westera, W. (2015). Games are motivating, arent they? Disputing the arguments for digitalgamebased learning. International Journal of Serious Games, 2(2), Online publication athttp://journal.seriousgamessociety.org/index.php?journal=IJSG&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5 D=58&path%5B%5D=pdf_17White, T.L., McBurney, D.H. (2013). Research methods. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage LearningWiji, W., & Mulyani, S. (2018). Students mental model, misconceptions, troublesome knowledge, andthreshold concept on thermochemistry with DToM-POE. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013(1), 012098. doi:10.1088/1742- 6596/1013/1/012098.Winter, J. (2018). Playing with chemistry. Nature Reviews Chemistry, 2(5), 45.doi:10.1038/s41570-018-0006-xWinter, J., Wentzel, M., & Ahluwalia, S. (2016). Chairs!: A mobile game for organic chemistrystudents to learn the ring flip of cyclohexane. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(9),1657-1659. doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00872.Wood, J., & Donnelly-Hermosillo, D. F. (2019). Learning chemistry nomenclature: Comparingthe use of an electronic game versus a study guide approach. Computers and Education, 141, 103615103757.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103615Yang, Y. T. C. (2012). Building virtual cities, inspiring intelligent citizens: Digitalgames for developing students problem solving and learning motivation. Journal Computers &Education, 59(2), 365377.Yitbarek, S. (2011). Chemical reaction: diagnosis and toward remedy ofmisconceptions. African Journal of Chemical Education, 1(1), 1028.Yksel. M, & Geban . (2014). A study of the prediction of academic achievement in the Chemistrycourse. Education and Science, 39(173), 354-365.Zaibon, S.B. (2011). Mobile Game-Based Learning (mGBL) Engineering Model.(Unpublished doctorate dissertation), Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok, Kedah.Zaibon, S. B., & Shiratuddin, N. (2009). Towards developing mobile game-based learningengineering model. 2009 WRI World Congress on Computer Science and Information Engineering. LosAngeles, USA, 31 March-2 April 2009, IEEE, , doi:10.1109/csie.2009.896.Zamri Mahamod & Noriah Mohd Ishak. (2003). Analisis Cohen Kappa dalampenyelidikan bahasa satu pengalaman. Kertas Kerja Seminar Penyelidikan Guru Peringkat Kebangsaan.Kuching, 19 20 Ogos.Zydney, J. M., & Warner, Z. (2016). Mobile apps for science learning: Review ofters & Education, 94, 117. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.001.

Similar Items