Kesan penggunaan kaedah mobil gallery walk terhadap minat dan prestasi pelajar ekonomi

Kesan penggunaan kaedah mobil gallery walk terhadap minat dan prestasi pelajar ekonomi

Kajian ini bertujuan menilai kesan penggunaan kaedah mobil gallery walk terhadap minatdan prestasi pelajar Ekonomi. Pendekatan kuantitatif dengan reka bentuk kuasi eksperimen telahdigunakan dalam kajian ini. Pemilihan sampel dalam kajian ini dijalankan secarapersampelan rawak mudah melibatkan 99 ora...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mazdalifa Makmun
Format: thesis
Language:zsm
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6748
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:6748
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
collection UPSI Digital Repository
language zsm
topic
spellingShingle
Mazdalifa Makmun
Kesan penggunaan kaedah mobil gallery walk terhadap minat dan prestasi pelajar ekonomi
description Kajian ini bertujuan menilai kesan penggunaan kaedah mobil gallery walk terhadap minatdan prestasi pelajar Ekonomi. Pendekatan kuantitatif dengan reka bentuk kuasi eksperimen telahdigunakan dalam kajian ini. Pemilihan sampel dalam kajian ini dijalankan secarapersampelan rawak mudah melibatkan 99 orang pelajar tingkatan empat yang mengambil mata pelajaranEkonomi di sebuah sekolah di Daerah Zon Sepang Selangor. Sampel kajian terdiri daripada tigakumpulan iaitu dua kumpulan eksperimen terdiri daripada 30 (KMGW) dan 35 (KGW) orangresponden serta satu kumpulan kawalan terdiri daripada 34 (KK) orang responden. Dua jenisinstrumen kajian digunakan iaitu soal selidik dan soalan ujian. Pra ujian dan pascaujian dijalankan terhadap kedua-dua instrumen bagi ketiga-tiga kumpulan. Data dianalisis dengan menggunakan analisis deskriptif dan inferensi. Analisis deskriptif menjelaskanperubahan tahap minat dan prestasi pelajar menerusi kaedah pembelajaran, manakala analisis inferensi pula melibatkan ujian MANCOVA, ujian ANCOVA dan ujian korelasi Pearsonyang menerangkan kesan serta hubungan antara pemboleh ubah kajian. Hasil kajian menunjukkanbahawa terdapat perubahan minat dan prestasi yang tinggi pada tempoh pascaujianberbanding praujian terhadap kumpulan pelajar yang didedahkan dengan KMGW berbanding dengankumpulan yang didedahkan dengan KGW dan KK. Hasil analisis MANCOVA menunjukkan bahawa terdapatkesan kaedah pembelajaran yang signifikan (F=49.989, p <.05) terhadap kajian yang dijalankan.Hasil analisis ANCOVA menunjukkan bahawa secara signifikannya terdapat kesan bagi kaedahpembelajaran terhadap pemboleh ubah minat (F= 316.559, p
format thesis
qualification_name
qualification_level Master's degree
author Mazdalifa Makmun
author_facet Mazdalifa Makmun
author_sort Mazdalifa Makmun
title Kesan penggunaan kaedah mobil gallery walk terhadap minat dan prestasi pelajar ekonomi
title_short Kesan penggunaan kaedah mobil gallery walk terhadap minat dan prestasi pelajar ekonomi
title_full Kesan penggunaan kaedah mobil gallery walk terhadap minat dan prestasi pelajar ekonomi
title_fullStr Kesan penggunaan kaedah mobil gallery walk terhadap minat dan prestasi pelajar ekonomi
title_full_unstemmed Kesan penggunaan kaedah mobil gallery walk terhadap minat dan prestasi pelajar ekonomi
title_sort kesan penggunaan kaedah mobil gallery walk terhadap minat dan prestasi pelajar ekonomi
granting_institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
granting_department Fakulti Pengurusan dan Ekonomi
publishDate 2019
url https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6748
_version_ 1747833304369856512
spelling oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:67482022-02-16 Kesan penggunaan kaedah mobil gallery walk terhadap minat dan prestasi pelajar ekonomi 2019 Mazdalifa Makmun Kajian ini bertujuan menilai kesan penggunaan kaedah mobil gallery walk terhadap minatdan prestasi pelajar Ekonomi. Pendekatan kuantitatif dengan reka bentuk kuasi eksperimen telahdigunakan dalam kajian ini. Pemilihan sampel dalam kajian ini dijalankan secarapersampelan rawak mudah melibatkan 99 orang pelajar tingkatan empat yang mengambil mata pelajaranEkonomi di sebuah sekolah di Daerah Zon Sepang Selangor. Sampel kajian terdiri daripada tigakumpulan iaitu dua kumpulan eksperimen terdiri daripada 30 (KMGW) dan 35 (KGW) orangresponden serta satu kumpulan kawalan terdiri daripada 34 (KK) orang responden. Dua jenisinstrumen kajian digunakan iaitu soal selidik dan soalan ujian. Pra ujian dan pascaujian dijalankan terhadap kedua-dua instrumen bagi ketiga-tiga kumpulan. Data dianalisis dengan menggunakan analisis deskriptif dan inferensi. Analisis deskriptif menjelaskanperubahan tahap minat dan prestasi pelajar menerusi kaedah pembelajaran, manakala analisis inferensi pula melibatkan ujian MANCOVA, ujian ANCOVA dan ujian korelasi Pearsonyang menerangkan kesan serta hubungan antara pemboleh ubah kajian. Hasil kajian menunjukkanbahawa terdapat perubahan minat dan prestasi yang tinggi pada tempoh pascaujianberbanding praujian terhadap kumpulan pelajar yang didedahkan dengan KMGW berbanding dengankumpulan yang didedahkan dengan KGW dan KK. Hasil analisis MANCOVA menunjukkan bahawa terdapatkesan kaedah pembelajaran yang signifikan (F=49.989, p <.05) terhadap kajian yang dijalankan.Hasil analisis ANCOVA menunjukkan bahawa secara signifikannya terdapat kesan bagi kaedahpembelajaran terhadap pemboleh ubah minat (F= 316.559, p 2019 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6748 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6748 text zsm closedAccess Masters Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Pengurusan dan Ekonomi Adeyemo, S. A., Adedoja, G. O. & Adelore, O. (2013). Mobile technology: Implicationsof its application on learning. International Council for Open Distance Education, 5(3), 249-254.Afendi, H., Amin E. & Haslinda. (2012). The use and perception of social networking sites amongMalaysian university students: A pilot study. International Journal of Learning, 18(7),153-164.Afendi, H., Amin E. & Haslinda. (2013). Top-performing students' use of socialnetworking sites. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology,5(2), 361-369.Agogo, P. O., Odoh, C. & Simon, B. (2014). Interest and sustenance as correlates ofstudents performance in senior secondary chemistry in Ogbadibo Local Government Area of BenueState, Nigeria. Global Educational Research Journal, 2(5), 55-60.Ahmad Arifin, Raden, Fikri & Mat Pa (2013). Bahasa arab untuk tujuan akademik. Kuala Lumpur:Penerbitan Universiti Malaya.Aldaghir, M. I. (2018). Do morning classes improve student learning of microeconomics principles?International Advances in Economic Research, 24(2), 163-177.Aliff, Isa, M. & Azwin, A. (2015). Teachers acceptance of mobile learning for teaching and learningin islamic education: A preliminary study. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 16(12),184-192.Aliff, N. & Isa, H. (2013). Tahap penerimaan penggunaan telefon bimbit sebagai m-pembelajaran dalam Pendidikan Islam. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam dan Arab, 5(1), 1- 10.Awodun, A. O., Oni, S. A., & Aladejana, A. L. (2014). Students variables as predictor of secondaryschool students performance in physics. International Journal of Scientific andResearch Publications, 4(8).Ayman, B. N. (2013). Students acceptance of mobile learning for higher education in Saudi Arabia.International Journal of Learning Management Systems, 1(1), 1-9.Azham Hussain, Abdulkarim Saleh, Abdussalam Taher, Imman Ahmed & Mohammed Lammasha.(2015). Usability evaluation method for mobile learning application using agile: Asystematic review. Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering), 72(1),1-6.Baharin, Y. & Yusop, F.D. (2011). Pembelajaran kolaboratif menggunakan blog dalam pelaksanaan pembelajaran mata pelajaran Ekonomi Asas. Jurnal Pendidikan, 31(1),1-12.Barati, M. & Zolhavarieh, S. (2012). Mobile learning and multi mobile service in higher education.International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 2(4), 297-298.Becker, W. E., & Watts, M. (2001). Teaching economics at the start of the 21st century: Still chalkand talk. American Economic Review, 91(2), 446-451.Bikanga Ada, M., Stansfield, M., & Baxter, G. (2017). Using mobile learning and social media toenhance learner feedback. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 9(1), 7090.Bohm, S., & Constantine, G. P. (2016). Impact of contextuality on mobile learningacceptance. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 13(2), 107-122.Brantes, F., J., Zanela, K. A., Freitas, A., & Schlemmer, E. (2013). Mobile learning:Definition, uses and challenges. Increasing Student Engagement and Retention Using MobileApplications: Smartphones, Skype and Texting Technologies, 6, 47- 82.Bringula, R., De Leon, J. S., Rayala, K. J., Pascual, B. A., & Sendino, K. (2017). Effects ofdifferent types of feedback of a mobile-assisted learning application and motivationtowards mathematics learning on students mathematics performance. International Journal ofWeb Information Systems, 13(3), 241-259.Campbell, E. & Stanley. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experiment al designs forresearch. Reprinted from handbook. Research on Teaching Copyright 1963 by Houghton MifflinCompany, 88.Campbell, E. A., Korzheva, N., Mustaev, A., Murakami, K., Nair, S., Goldfarb, A., &Darst, S. A. (2001). Structural mechanism for rifampicin inhibition of bacterial RNA polymerase.Cell, 104(6), 901912.Cargan. (2007). Doing social research. Social science. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 345.Chaiprasurt, C., & Esichaikul, V. (2013). Enhancing motivation in online courses with mobilecommunication tool support: A comparative study. The International Review of Research in Open andDistributed Learning, 14(3), 377-401.Chen, D. R., Chen, M. Y., Huang, T. C. & Hsu, W. P. (2013). Developing a mobile learning system inaugmented reality context. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 1-7.Chin S. F. & Lim H. L. (2018). The effect of computerized feedback on studentsmisconceptions in algebraic expression. Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. & Hum, 26 (3), 1387-1403.Chowdhury, M., & Mallik, G. (2012). How important are introductory subjects in advanced economicsstudies? The Economic Society of Australia, 31(2), 255- 264.Chu, S. K. W., Reynolds, R. B, Tavares, N. J, Notari, M., & Lee, C. W. Y. (2017). 21st centuryskills development through inquiry-based learning: From theory to practice. Singapore: SpringerPublisher.Chua, Y. P. (2006). Kaedah dan Statistik Penyelidikan: Kaedah Penyelidikan (Edisi ke 2).Terbitan McGraw-Hill, 346.Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2?? edition.).Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates Publishers, 579.Cook, K. L. & Bush, S. B. (2015). Structuring a science-mathematics partnership to supportpreservice teachers' data analysis and interpretation skills. Journal of College Science Teaching,44(5), 31-37.Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory andapplications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 98-104. American Psychological Association, Inc.Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches(4?? edition.). London: Sage Publications Ltd Publishers, 273.Dagar V. & Yadav, A. (2016). Constructivism: A paradigm for teaching and learning. Arts and SocialSciences Journal, 7(4), 1-4.Darrell, M. W. (2013). Mobile learning: transforming education, engaging students, and improvingoutcomes. Centre of Technology Innovation, US: Brookings Publiser.De Pedro, K. T., Jackson, C., Campbell, E., Gilley, J. & Clarelli, B. (2016). Creating trans-insclusive schools: Introductory activities that enhance the critical consciousness of futureeducators. International Journal of Teaching dan Learning in Higher Eduction, 28(2),293-301.Di Teodoro, S., Donders, S., Kemp-Davidson, J., Robertson, P. & Schuyler, L. (2011). Asking goodquestions: Promoting greater understanding of mathematics through purposeful teacher andstudent questioning. Canadian Journal of Action Research, 12(2), 18-29.Ding, M., & Li, H. (2011). On the application of multimedia in economics teaching.International Education Studies, 4(3), 88.Emrah, S. & Huseyin, U. (2015). New trends on mobile learning area: The review ofpublished articles on mobile learning in science direct database. World Journal on EducationalTechnology, 7(1), 31-41.Erma. (2014). Hubungan antara sikap, minat, pengajaran guru dan pengaruh rakan sebaya terhadapprestasi matematik tambahan tingkatan 4. Jurnal kurikulum dan pengajaran asia pasifik, 2(1), 1-10.Fannia L., Rini & Arman E.Y. (2017). Penerapan metode pembelajaran gallery walk untuk meningkatkanprestasi belajar peserta didik pada pokok bahasan struktur atom dan sistem periodik unsur dukelas X Mia Sman2 Pekan baru. Jurnal Mahasiswa: Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(1),1-13.Farkas, M. (2018). Postscript: What my thinking looks like. Teaching ChildrenMathematics, 25(3), 192.Farrah, Z. (2015). Enhancing students speaking skill through gallery walk technique.English education department, state institute for islamic studies (IAIN) Salatiga.Indonesia Language and Language Teaching Journal, 8(2), 253-268.Fox, J., & Hoffman, W. (2011). The differentiated instruction book of lists. San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass A Wiley Imprint PublisherFraenkel, J. R. & Wallen. N. E. (1993) How to design and evaluate research in education.2nd Edition, New York. McGraw-Hill Inc.Franzblau, L., & Haque, F. (2018). Using gallery walks to navigate hospital hierarchy.Medical Education, 52(11), 1185-1186.Francek M. (2006). Promoting discussion in the science classroom using gallery walks. J Coll SciTeach, 36(1), 27-32.Frety (2017). Pembelajaran berbasis proyek metode gallery walk untuk meningkatkan hasil belajarsiswa pada materi sistem ekskresi manusia. Jurnal Skripsi Pendidikan Biologi, 1-13.Fuad Mohamed Berawi (2017). Metodologi penyelidikan: Panduan menulis tesis. UUM, Sintok: PenerbitUniversiti Utara Malaysia.Gay, L.R., Mills, G.E., & Airasian, P. (2009). Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis andApplication (9th edition). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.Gilakjani, A. P., Lai, M. L. & Hairul Nizam Ismail (2013). Teachers use of technology andconstructivism. I.J.Modern Education and Computer Science, 4, 49-63.Glood, S.H., Hussein, R.M. & Kamil, W.A. (2018). The effects of information quality, servicequality, and compatibility on continue use of M-learning among students in the publicuniversities of Iraqi. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 96(12),3739-3755.Gray, G., McGuinness, C., Owende, P. & Hofmann, M. (2016). Learning factor models of students atrisk of failing in the early of tertiary education. Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(2),330-372.Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., & Anderson, R.E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis7?? Ed. United States: Pearson Prentice Hall.Hakim, A., Aziz & Ismail, W. (2015). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi motivasi terhadap pembelajaranBahasa Arab. Jurnal Islam dan Masyarakat Kontemporari, 10, 104- 121.Halim, A. & Najib, M. (2016). Penggunaan aplikasi rangkaian sosial dalam kalanganpelajar Politeknik Kuala Terengganu. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1, 81-90.Hannafin, M. J., Hill, J. R., Land, S. M., & Lee, E. (2014). Student-centered, open learningenvironments: Research, theory, and practice. In Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology: Fourth Edition (pp. 641-651). Springer New YorkHendri & Retika. (2017). The use of gallery walk to enhance the speaking achievement of the ninthgrade students of Smp Pgri 1 Palembang. Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 6(1), 50-56.Hogan, J. P. & Cernusca, D. (2011). Integrating gallery walks and wikis in a synergicinstructional activity: An exploratory study of students' perceptions. Computers in EducationJournal, 21(4), 37-48.Hu, X., Gong, Y., Lai, C., & Leung, F. K. S. (2018). The relationship between ICT and studentliteracy in mathematics, reading, and science across 44 countries: A multilevel analysis.Computers & Education, 125, 1-13.Huang, C. S. J., Yang, S. J. H., Chiang, T. H. C., & Su, A. Y. S. (2016). Effects of situatedmobile learning approach on learning motivation and performance of EFL students. EducationalTechnology dan Society, 19 (1), 263-276.Isik, C., & Yilmaz, S. (2012). The role of ICT in general economics teaching: An example fromTurkey. International Journal of Education Economics and Development, 3(4), 289-304.Jeevi, S. & Safinas (2013). The ability of the polytechnics marketing student in using good Englishoral communication skills during industrial training. English for Specific Purposes World,14(39), 1-15.Kahayun, Wakidi & Yustina (2015). Pengaruh gallery walk terhadap minat belajar sejarah di Sman 1Natar. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Penelitian Sejarah, 3(2), 1-14.Kalaiselvi & Balamuralithara. (2018). Kerangka panduan efektif pengajaran danpemudahcaraan (PDPC) sains menggunakan information communication technology (ICT) di sekolah jeniskebangsaan tamil (SJK Tamil). Sains Humanika, 10(1), 25-35.Kamarul, Felix, B. T. & Ammar. (2014). Adult learners' intention to adopt mobile learning: Amotivational perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 381- 390.Kementerian Kewangan Malaysia. (2014). Maklum balas ke atas Laporan Ketua Audit Negara siri 3.Putrajaya, Malaysia.Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (2015). Kurikulum standard sekolah menengah Ekonomitingkatan 4. Dokumen standard kurikulum dan pentaksiran tingkatan 4. Bahagian pembangunankurikulum. Putrajaya, MalaysiaKementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025.Pendidikan Prasekolah hingga Lepasan Menengah. Putrajaya, MalaysiaKementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2018). Buku Penerangan Kurikulum Standard SekolahMenengah (KSSM). Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. ISBN: 978-967- 420-092-3.Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2016). Surat Pekeliling Ikhtisas Bilangan 9.Pelaksanaan Kurikulum Standard Menengah Secara Berperingkat-peringkat Mulai Tahun 2017. SuratSiaran Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia Bilangan 19 Tahun 2016. Putrajaya, MalaysiaKementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2017). Dasar pendidikan kebangsaan. (EdisiKeempat). Putrajaya, Malaysia.Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2018). Pengumuman Analisis Keputusan SijilPeperiksaan Malaysia (SPM) Tahun 2017. Putrajaya, MalaysiaKennedy, M. J., Mimmack, J., & Flannery, K. B. (2012). Innovation in data-driven decision makingwithin SWPBIS systems: Welcome to the gallery walk. Beyond Behavior, 21(3), 8-14. Sage Publisher.Khairah, Saedah & Muhammad Faizal (2017). Penerimaan m-pembelajaran dalam kalanganpensyarah institut pendidikan guru Malaysia melalui the unified theory of acceptance and use oftechnology (UTAUT): Satu kajian awal. Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 4(2), 56-73.Khizbullin, F. F., Sologub, T. G., Bulganina, S.V., Lebedeva, T.E., Novikov, V.S. &Prokhorova, V.V. (2017). The direction of transformation of information and communicationtechnology (ICT) at the present stage of development into an electronic and informationsociety. Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. & Hum, 25 (S), 45-58.Khoo Y. Y., Irfan Naufal Umar & Nadiah Yan Abdullah. (2018). A mobile cartoonframework for promoting communication skills among secondary school economics students. Journal ofAdvanced Science Letters, 24(11), 7977-7979.Kozulin, A. (2011). Learning potential and cognitive modifiability. Assessment inEducation: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(2), 169-181.Kpolovie, P. J., Joe, A. I. & Oktoto, T. (2014). Academic achievement prediction: Role of interestin learning and attitude towards school. International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences andEducation (IJHSSE), 1(11), 73-100.Kruea-In, N., & Thongperm, O. (2014). Teaching of science process skills in Thai contexts: Status,supports and obstacles. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 13241329.Kumar Basak, S., Wotto, M. & Belanger, P. (2018). E-learning, M-learning and D-learning: Conceptual definition and comparative analysis. E-Learning and Digital Media, 15(4),191-216..Lay Y. F., Khoo C. H. & Ley C. M. (2016). Pengenalan Kepada Analisis Data Dengan IBM SPSSStatistics 19. UMS Publisher.Lee, E., & Hannafin, M. J. (2016). A design framework for enhancing engagement instudent-centered learning: Own it, learn it, and share it. Educational TechnologyResearch and Development, 64(4), 707-734.Macaluso, K. D. & Hughes, A. (2015). The use of mobile apps to enhance student learning inintroduction to psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 43(1), 48-52.Majid, K. (2005). Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa & PustakaPublishers, 599.Mariyaningsih N. (2014). Peningkatan aktivitas dan hasil belajar akuntansi materi laporan keuanganmelalui metode gallery walk duati-duata. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi Dinamika Pendidikan,14(1), 57-59.Mark, F. (2006). Promoting discussion in the science classroom using gallery walks.Journal of College Science Teaching; Washington, 36(1), 27-31.Martin, W.E. & Bridgmon, K.D. (2012). Quantitative and Statistical Research Methods: FromHypothesis to Results (1?? Edition).USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Maslin, Amirah, Hasnaa, Normeza & Raihana. (2016). Mobile learning in Malaysia educationinstitutions. Issues in Information Systems, 17(5), 152-157.Matsuoka, R. H. (2010). Student performance and high school landscapes: Examining the links.Landscape and Urban Planning, 97(4), 273-282.May, K. E., & Elder, A. D. (2018). Efficient, helpful, or distracting? A literature review of mediamultitasking in relation to academic performance. International Journal of Educational Technologyin Higher Education, 15(1), 1-17.Mobithinking. (2013). Global mobile statistics 2013 Part A: Mobile subscribers; handset marketshare; mobile operators. Mobile Web Intelligence Report: MobiForge Publisher.Mohd Hanafi, Hasnah, Mohd Mokhtar, Lokman & Suriawati. (2014). Learning station methodin special education programs for students with learning disabilities. Pertanika J. Soc.Sci. & Hum, 22 (3), 717-728.Mohd Hashim & Abubakar. (2017). The availability of electronic courses using ictinfrastructure in teaching and learning among teachers in Nigerias TVETinstitutions. Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. & Hum, 25 (S), 17-28.Mohd. Najib Abdul Ghafar. (2003). Rekabentuk Tinjauan Soal Selidik Pendidikan. Skudai, Johor:Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.Mohd Noor Badlilshah Abdul Kadir, Mohd Mustamam Abdul Karim & Nurulhuda Abd. Rahman (2016). Sikappelajar terhadap pembelajaran fizik dan hubungannya dengan pencapaian dalam kalangan pelajar sains.Jurnal Personalia Pelajar, 19(1), 23-38.Mok, M. M. C. (2010). Self-directed learning oriented assessment: Assessment that informslearning & empowers the learner. Hong Kong: PACE Publishing, 144.Noorhadi, M. & Zurinah. (2017). Kepentingan penggunaan media sosial teknologi maklumatdalam pendidikan IPTA. Jurnal sains sosial dan kemanusiaan, 12(3), 1- 10.Onwuegbuzie, A.J., & Collins, K.M.T. (2007). A Typology of mix-methods sampling design insocial science research. The Qualitative Report, 12(2), 281-316.Ortega Garca, A., Ruiz-Martnez, A. & Valencia-Garca, R. (2018). Using app inventor for creatingapps to support m-learning experiences: A case study. Computer Applications in EngineeringEducation, 26(3), 431-448.Phang. (2018). Ekonomi Tingkatan 4. KSSM. Selangor: Penerbitan Pelangi Sdn Bhd, 87.Pillai, R. & Sivathanu, B. (2018). An empirical study on the adoption of M-learning apps amongIT/ITeS employees. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 15(3), 182- 204.PSPTN. (2013). Official portal higher education sector. Putrajaya, MalaysiaRafiza (2013). Strategi pembelajaran aktif secara kolaboratif atas talian dalam analisisnovel Bahasa Melayu. Jurnal Kurikulum dan Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 1(3), 34-46.Rambe, P., & Bere, A. (2013). Using mobile instant messaging to leverage learnerparticipation and transform pedagogy at a South African University of Technology. British Journalof Educational Technology, 44(4), 544-561.Ramlah & Mahani. (2004). Psikologi pendidikan pendekatan kontemporari. Malaysia:McGraw-Hill.Ramlee Ismail & Sashi Kala Krishnan. (2013). Amalan pengajaran guru, sikap pelajar dan hubungannyadengan pencapaian Ekonomi Asas sekolah menengah. KORPUS, 122-131. Fakulti Pengurusan & Ekonomi, UPSI.Raza, S.A., Umer, A., Qazi, W. & Makhdoom, M. (2018). The effects of attitudinal,normative, and control beliefs on m-learning adoption among the students of higher education inPakistan. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(4), 563-588.Razali, N.M., & Wah, Y.B (2011). Power comparisons of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov- Smirnov,Lilliefors and Anderson-Darling tests. Journal of Statistical Modelling and Analytics, 2(1), 21-23.Rodenbaugh, D. W. (2015). Maximize a team-based learning gallery walk experience: Herdingcats is easier than you think. Advances in Physiology Education, 39(4), 411 413.Rosnidar, Haeidatul, Norazilawati & Azmah, N. (2015). Keberkesanan penggunaan I- Thinkterhadap prestasi dan minat murid dalam tajuk sifat bahan, Sains Tahun 4. Jurnal Pendidikan Sainsdan Matematik Malaysia, 5(2), 98-116.Ruel, E., Wagner, W. E., & Gillespie, B. J. (2016). The practice of survey research. Theory andapplications. Singapore: Sage Publication.Sabriyadi, Nana & Tatang. (2015). Hubungan antara minat baca dengan prestasi belajar pada mata pelajaran produktif di smk. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, 2(1),124-129.Saedah, Fadhilah & Mohammad Helmi. (2012). Mlearning: A new dimension ofcurriculum advancement. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: University of Malaya Publisher.Schmitt, N. (1996). Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychological Assessment, 8(4), 350-353.Shabani, K., Khatib, M., & Ebadi, S. (2010). Vygotskys zone of proximal development: Instructional implications and teachers professional development. English Language Teaching, 3(4),237-248.Shahabuddin Hashim, Rohizani Yaakub, & Mohd Zohir Ahmad. (2007). Pedagogi: Strategi danTeknik Mengajar dengan Berkesan. Shah Alam: PTS.Shahan, A. C., Waqas, K. O. & Haslina, A. (2013). A mobile augmented reality andmultimedia application for mobile learning. International Journal of Digital Content Technology andits Application, 7(13), 25-32.Shaharuddin, A., Khaidzir, Azizan, Kadira, Zainul, A., Khairil, A. & Mazlina, W. (2014). The socialand academic skills and the marketability of UKM's graduates. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 131, 118-123.Shapiro, S.S., & Wilk, M.B. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality (Complete Samples).Biometrika, 52(3/4), 591-611.Sharifah & Kamarul. (2011) Tahap kesediaan penggunaan ICT dalam pengajaran dan kesannyaterhadap hasil kerja dan tingkah laku murid prasekolah. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 36 (1), 25-34.Shih, J. L., Chuang, C. W., & Hwang, G. J. (2010). An inquiry-based mobile learning approach toenhancing social science learning effectiveness. Educational Technology dan Society, 13 (4), 50-62.Shyshkanova, G., Zaytseva, T., & Frydman, O. (2017). Mobile technologies make education apart of everyday life. Information and Learning Science, 118(11/12), 570-582.Silberman, M.L. (2014). Active learning: 101 cara belajar siswa aktif, terjemahan: Raisulmuttaqien. Bandung: Nuansa Cendekia Publisher.Simelane, S., & Mji, A. (2014). Impact of technology-engagement teaching strategy with the aid ofclickers on students learning style. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 136, 511521.Sintayehu, M. (2014). Problems challenging the academic performance of physics students in highergovernmental institutions in the Case of Arbaminch, Wolayita Sodo, Hawassa and DillaUniversities. Natural Science Journal, 6, 362-375.Splitter, L.J. (2009). Critical thinking: What, why, when, and how. Australia: Australian councilfor education research. Studies in philosophy and education, 28 (2), 135-151Stevens, J. (1986). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: ErlbaumStewart, M. A. & Beaudry, J. (2017). The gallery walk: Educators step up to buildassessment literacy. Learning Professional, 38(6), 48-53.Stockwell, G., & Hubbard, P. (2013). Some emerging principles for mobile-assistedlanguage learning. The International Research Foundation for English Language Education,1-15.Strang, K. D. (2016). Can online student performance be forecasted by learning analytics?International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 8(1), 26-47.Suruhanjaya Komunikasi dan Multimedia Malaysia. (2013). Laporan Tahunan 2013. SuruhanjayaKomunikasi dan Multimedia Malaysia. (2014). Kajian Pengguna TelefonBimbit 2014.Swan, K., & Hofer, M. (2011). In search of technological pedagogical content knowledge: Teachers'initial foray into podcasting in economics. Journal of Research on Technology inEducation, 44(1), 75.Thomas, S. J. (2004). Using web and paper questionnaires for data based decision making from designto interpretation of the result. California: Sage Publication.Thompson, S. K. (2012). Sampling (3?? Edition).Canada: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.,Publication.Thorndike. (2009). Measurement and evaluation in psychology and education (8?? Edition).Pearson Publisher, 528.Traynor, A. (2017). Does test item performance increase with test-to-standards alignment?Educational Assessment, 22(3), 171-188.Tsai, Young & Liang. (2005). Exploring the course development model for the mobile learningcontext: A preliminary study. Kertas kerja Fifth IEEE International Conference on AdvancedLearning Technologies (ICALT05). Kaohsiung, Taiwan.UNESCO. (2012). Turning on mobile learning in Latin America. Working paper series on mobilelearning. Paris: UNESCO.Venkataraman, J. B., & Ramasamy, S. (2018). Factors influencing mobile learning: Aliterature review of selected journal papers. International Journal of Mobile Learning andOrganisation, 12(2), 99.Viljaranta, J., Tolvanen, A., Aunola, K., & Nurmi, J. E. (2014). The developmentaldynamics between interest, self-concept of ability, and academic performance. ScandinavianJournal of Educational Research, 58(6), 734-756.Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. Readings on the developmentof children. Creative Education, 23(3), 34-41.Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Wahyudin, Ishak Abdulhak, Munir & Dinn Wahyudin. (2017). Development of cyberblog learning media toimprove logical thinking concepts on computer science students. Pertanika J. Sci. & Technol. 25(S), 35-46.Yang, Y.T. & Wu, W.C. (2012). Digital storytelling for enhancing student academicachievement, critical thinking, and learning motivation: A year-long experimental study. Computerand Education, 59(2), 339-352.Yani, Abdi & Harun. (2017). Penerapan model pembelajaran kooperatif gallery walk untuk meningkatkanhasil belajar geografi siswa kelas x-b sma negeri 7 takengon. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa PendidikanGeografi Unsyiah, 2(2), 59-69.Yusliza & Farrah. (2011). Pembelajaran kolaboratif menggunakan blog dalampembelajaran mata pelajaran Ekonomi. Jurnal Pendidikan, 31, 79-89.Zahidah, Shanti, Nurul Shuhadah, Zaidatul & Nurulain. (2017). Digital learning resource for basicmovement therapy course: Blended learning approach. Pertanika J. Sci. & Technol, 25 (S), 9-16.Zakariya, & Bamidel. (2015). Investigation into the causes of poor academic performance inmathematics among Nigerian undergraduate students. World Journal of Social Sciences andHumanities, 1(1), 1-5.Zeinab Takbiri & Abbas Afshar. (2012). Multi-objective optimization of fusegates system underhydrologic uncertainties. Water Resources Management: An InternationalJournal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), 26(8),2323-2345.Zheng, L., Chen, N. S., Li, X., & Huang, R. (2016). The impact of a two-round, mobile peerassessment on learning achievements, critical thinking skills, and meta- cognitiveawareness. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation,10(4), 292.

Similar Items