Reka bentuk dan pembangunan model pembuatan keputusan berasaskan faktor dalam pelaksanaan dasar 60:40 di sekolah menengah harian di Malaysia

Kajian ini bertujuan untuk membina model pembuatan keputusan berasaskan faktor dalampelaksanaan dasar 60:40 di sekolah menengah harian di Malaysia. Pendekatan kajian yang digunakanadalah kajian reka bentuk dan pembangunan (design and development research) yang dilaksanakandalam tiga fasa iaitu fasa...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Nor Aidillina Mohd Ramli
Format:	thesis
Language:	zsm
Published:	2021
Subjects:	LB Theory and practice of education
Online Access:	https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6855
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:6855
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
collection	UPSI Digital Repository
language	zsm
topic	LB Theory and practice of education
spellingShingle	LB Theory and practice of education Nor Aidillina Mohd Ramli Reka bentuk dan pembangunan model pembuatan keputusan berasaskan faktor dalam pelaksanaan dasar 60:40 di sekolah menengah harian di Malaysia
description	Kajian ini bertujuan untuk membina model pembuatan keputusan berasaskan faktor dalampelaksanaan dasar 60:40 di sekolah menengah harian di Malaysia. Pendekatan kajian yang digunakanadalah kajian reka bentuk dan pembangunan (design and development research) yang dilaksanakandalam tiga fasa iaitu fasa analisis keperluan, fasa pembangunan dan rekabentuk serta fasapenilaian. Fasa analisis keperluan dilaksanakan dengan menggunakan kaedah temu bual semi-strukturbersama tujuh orang pakar. Manakala fasa pembangunan dan rekabentuk dijalankan dalam dua peringkat.Peringkat pertama adalah temu-bual pakar bagi mengenal pasti aspek yang perlu dimasukkan ke dalammodel yang dibina. Seterusnya peringkat kedua melibatkan 20 orang pakar dimana teknik fuzzydelphi digunakan bagi mencapai kesepakatan pakar. Pada fasa kedua kajian ini, satu modelprototaip telah dibina. Seterusnya, fasa penilaian melibatkan 347 orang pengetua sekolahmenengah harian sebagai responden kajian untuk menjawab soal selidik. Fasa ini bertujuan untukmembuat penilaian ke atas model prototaip yang dibentuk dalam fasa sebelumnya. Dapatan kajian yangdiperoleh dianalisis menggunakan analisis korelasi Pearson dan regresi berganda. Di akhir fasapenilaian, satu model sebenar telah dibina dan didapati bahawa faktor persekitaransekolah (R change=0.401, p=0.000) merupakan faktor yang paling memberi sumbangan terhadappembuatan keputusan. Ini diikuti oleh faktor risiko (R change=0.085, p=0.000), pentadbir (Rchange=0.051, p=0.000), kendiri murid (R change=0.035, p=0.000), pencapaian akademik(R change=0.019, p=0.000) dan ibu bapa (R change=0.014, p=0.000). Hasil dapatankajian ini mengukuhkan model sedia ada dengan memberi tumpuan kepada isu yang spesifik iaitupelaksanaan dasar 60:40. Selain itu, model dibina juga memberi input kepada pihak KementerianPendidikan Malaysia untuk menyediakan persekitaran sekolah yang kondusif yang mana ini adalahfaktor penyumbang paling utama dalam pembuatan keputusan. Seterusnya dapatan kajian ini bolehdijadikan panduan kepada pengetua dalam pembuatan keputusan bagi memastikan pelaksanaan dasar 60:40mencapai sasaran yang ditetapkan. Kajian ini boleh dilanjutkan dengan memberitumpuan kepada kelompok pentadbir yang berlainan dan jenis sekolah yang berbeza.
format	thesis
qualification_name
qualification_level	Doctorate
author	Nor Aidillina Mohd Ramli
author_facet	Nor Aidillina Mohd Ramli
author_sort	Nor Aidillina Mohd Ramli
title	Reka bentuk dan pembangunan model pembuatan keputusan berasaskan faktor dalam pelaksanaan dasar 60:40 di sekolah menengah harian di Malaysia
title_short	Reka bentuk dan pembangunan model pembuatan keputusan berasaskan faktor dalam pelaksanaan dasar 60:40 di sekolah menengah harian di Malaysia
title_full	Reka bentuk dan pembangunan model pembuatan keputusan berasaskan faktor dalam pelaksanaan dasar 60:40 di sekolah menengah harian di Malaysia
title_fullStr	Reka bentuk dan pembangunan model pembuatan keputusan berasaskan faktor dalam pelaksanaan dasar 60:40 di sekolah menengah harian di Malaysia
title_full_unstemmed	Reka bentuk dan pembangunan model pembuatan keputusan berasaskan faktor dalam pelaksanaan dasar 60:40 di sekolah menengah harian di Malaysia
title_sort	reka bentuk dan pembangunan model pembuatan keputusan berasaskan faktor dalam pelaksanaan dasar 60:40 di sekolah menengah harian di malaysia
granting_institution	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
granting_department	Fakulti Pengurusan dan Ekonomi
publishDate	2021
url	https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6855
_version_	1747833321831792640
spelling	oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:68552022-03-07 Reka bentuk dan pembangunan model pembuatan keputusan berasaskan faktor dalam pelaksanaan dasar 60:40 di sekolah menengah harian di Malaysia 2021 Nor Aidillina Mohd Ramli LB Theory and practice of education Kajian ini bertujuan untuk membina model pembuatan keputusan berasaskan faktor dalampelaksanaan dasar 60:40 di sekolah menengah harian di Malaysia. Pendekatan kajian yang digunakanadalah kajian reka bentuk dan pembangunan (design and development research) yang dilaksanakandalam tiga fasa iaitu fasa analisis keperluan, fasa pembangunan dan rekabentuk serta fasapenilaian. Fasa analisis keperluan dilaksanakan dengan menggunakan kaedah temu bual semi-strukturbersama tujuh orang pakar. Manakala fasa pembangunan dan rekabentuk dijalankan dalam dua peringkat.Peringkat pertama adalah temu-bual pakar bagi mengenal pasti aspek yang perlu dimasukkan ke dalammodel yang dibina. Seterusnya peringkat kedua melibatkan 20 orang pakar dimana teknik fuzzydelphi digunakan bagi mencapai kesepakatan pakar. Pada fasa kedua kajian ini, satu modelprototaip telah dibina. Seterusnya, fasa penilaian melibatkan 347 orang pengetua sekolahmenengah harian sebagai responden kajian untuk menjawab soal selidik. Fasa ini bertujuan untukmembuat penilaian ke atas model prototaip yang dibentuk dalam fasa sebelumnya. Dapatan kajian yangdiperoleh dianalisis menggunakan analisis korelasi Pearson dan regresi berganda. Di akhir fasapenilaian, satu model sebenar telah dibina dan didapati bahawa faktor persekitaransekolah (R change=0.401, p=0.000) merupakan faktor yang paling memberi sumbangan terhadappembuatan keputusan. Ini diikuti oleh faktor risiko (R change=0.085, p=0.000), pentadbir (Rchange=0.051, p=0.000), kendiri murid (R change=0.035, p=0.000), pencapaian akademik(R change=0.019, p=0.000) dan ibu bapa (R change=0.014, p=0.000). Hasil dapatankajian ini mengukuhkan model sedia ada dengan memberi tumpuan kepada isu yang spesifik iaitupelaksanaan dasar 60:40. Selain itu, model dibina juga memberi input kepada pihak KementerianPendidikan Malaysia untuk menyediakan persekitaran sekolah yang kondusif yang mana ini adalahfaktor penyumbang paling utama dalam pembuatan keputusan. Seterusnya dapatan kajian ini bolehdijadikan panduan kepada pengetua dalam pembuatan keputusan bagi memastikan pelaksanaan dasar 60:40mencapai sasaran yang ditetapkan. Kajian ini boleh dilanjutkan dengan memberitumpuan kepada kelompok pentadbir yang berlainan dan jenis sekolah yang berbeza. 2021 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6855 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6855 text zsm closedAccess Doctoral Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Pengurusan dan Ekonomi Abdul Fatah Abdul Malik & Mohd. Majid Konting (1993). Memahami Penyelidikan Pendidikan:Satu Pengenalan. Edisi ke-4. Selangor: Universiti Putra Malaysia.Abersek, B. (2017). Evolution of Competence for New Era or Education 4.0.Conference of Czech Educational Research Association, Czech.Adler, M. & Ziglio, E. (1996). Gazing In The Oracle: The Delphi Method and ItApplication to Social Policy and Public Health. London: Jessica KingsleyPublisher.Ahmad Susanto (2013). Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran di Sekolah Dasar. Jakarta:Prenadamedia Group.Akademi Sains Malaysia (2015). Science Outlook: Action towards Vision. Kuala Lumpur:Akademi Sains Malaysia.Akbari, R, & Yazdanmehr, E. (2014). A Critical Analysis of the Selection Criteria ofExpert Teachers in ELT. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(8), 1653- 1658.Ali Selamat (2017). Higher education 4.0: Current Status and Readiness in Meeting TheFourth Industrial Revolution Challenges. Proceeding Redesigning Higher Education towards Industry 4.0, Kuala Lumpur. Retrieved fromhttps://www.moe.gov.my/muat-turun/teks-ucapan-dan-slide/2017/1527-redesign-he-4- 0-higher-education-4-0-current-status-and-readiness-in-meeting-the-fourth-industrial-revolution-challenges/fileAlias Baba (1999). Statistik Penyelidikan Dalam Pendidikan dan Sains Sosial. Bangi: UniversitiKebangsaan Malaysia.Almeida, S. (2017). Policy-makers and Practitioners Perspectives on Impact,Evidence, and Support for Teacher Educators Implementing Environmental Education forSustainability in India. Teacher Education Policy and Practice. 35-48.Amanchukwu, R.N., Stanley, G. J. & Ololube, N. P. (2015). A Review of Leadership Theories,Principles and Styles and Their Relevance to Educational Management. Management, 5(1), 6-14.Ananda Kumar Palaniappan (2009). Penyelidikan dan SPSS (PASW). Kuala Lumpur:Pearson-Prentice Hall.Appiah-Adu, K. & Aning, S. (2012). Enhancing Governments Policy Management and Decision-Making System: The Case of Ghanas Central Governanceoject. Canadian Public Administration, 55(1), 125147.Asian Development Bank (2010). Education Sector Risk Assessment. Filipina: AsianDevelopment Bank.Auld, E. & Morris, P. (2014). Comparative Education, the New Paradigm and Policy Borrowing: Constructing Knowledge for Educational Reform. Comparative Education, 50(2), 129155.Aven, T. (2007). A Unified Framework for Risk and Vulnerability Analysis Covering bothSafety and Security. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 92(6), 745754.Ayob Jantan (2005). Pengetua Sekolah yang Efektif. Pahang: PTS Profesional.Azizi Yahya, Shahrin Hashim, Jamaludin Ramli, Yusof Boon & Abdul Rahim Hamdan(2006). Menguasai Penyelidikan Dalam Pendidikan: Teori, Analisis Dan Interpretasi Data. KualaLumpur: PTS Professional.Bakker, J. & Denessen, E. (2007). The Concept of Parent Involvement: SomeTheoretical and Empirical Consideration. International Journal and Parents in Education, 1,188-199Balakrishanan, B., Foon Siang Low & Mohamed Nor Azhari Azman (2015). Persepsi Pelajar Perempuan Terhadap Program Dan Profesion Dalam Bidang Kejuruteraan: Kajian kesdi Malaysia dan Jepun. Jurnal Teknologi, 72(1): 1-6.Ball, S. J. (1998). Big Policies/Small World: An Introduction to InternationalPerspectives in Education Policy. Comparative Education, 34(2), 119-130.Baloi, D. & Price, A.D.F. (2003). Modelling Global Risk Factors AffectingConstruction Cost Performance. International Journal of Project Management, 21(4), 261269.Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Towards a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change.Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.Bandura, A. (1989). Human Agency in Social Cognitive Theory. American Psychologist, 44(9),1175-1184.Bandura, A. (1989). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory.Eaglewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. HFreeman.Bandura, A. (2006). Guide For Constructing Self-Efficacy Scales. Dlm. Pajares, F &Urdan, T. Self-efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents. 307-337. America: Information AgePublishing.Baron, J. (2004). Normative Model of Judgement and Decision Making. Dlm. Koehler,D. J. & Harvey, N. Handbook of Judgement and Decision Making. 19-36. BlackwellPublishing: Australia.Barton. C, Kang, Tan, ONeill, Bautitsta-Guerra & Brecklin (2011). The Age of STEM: EducationalPolicy and Practice across the World in Sscience, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics.New York: Routledge.Bass, B. M. (2008). The Bass Handbook of Leadership. New York, NY: Free Press.Becker, K. & Park, K. (2011). Effects of Integrative Approaches among Science,Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Subjects on Students Learning: APreliminary Meta-Analysis. Journal of STEM Education, 12, 23- 37.Beedee, D., Julian, T., Langdon, D., McKittrick, G., Khan, B. & Doms, M. (2011). Womenin STEM: A Gender Gap to Innovation. U.S: U.S Department of Commerce, Economics andStatistics Administration.Bell, D. E, Raiffa, H. & Tversky, A. (1995). Decision Making: Descriptive, Normative andPrescriptive Interaction. Australia: Cambridge University Press.Bernstein, P. L. (2003). The Failure of Invariance. Dlm. Ben Warwick. The Handbook of Risk.3-16. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons.Bodjanova, S. (2006). Median Alpha-Levels of a Fuzzy Number. Fuzzy Sets and Systems,157(7), 879891.Boehm, B. (1988). A Spiral Model of Software Development and Enhancement. IEEE Computer, 21(5),62-72.Bollerslev, T. (2008). Glossary to ARCH (GARCH). CREATE Research Paper, 49. Boomsma, A. (1982).The Robustness of LISREL against Small Sample Sizes in FactorAnalysis Models. Dlm. Joreskog, K. G. J. & Wold, H. (Eds.), Systems under indirect observation: Causality, structure, prediction. 149173. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Bottia, M. C., Stearns, E., Mickelson, A. R., Moller, S. & Parker, A. D. (2015). TheRelationship Among High School STEM Learning Experiences And Students Intent To DeclareAnd Declaration Of A STEM Major In College. Teachers College Record, 117(3), 1-46.Brady, L. (1995). Curriculum Development (5?? Ed.). Sydney : Prentice-HallBrazer, S. D. & Keller, L. R. (2008). A Design Research Approach to InvestigatingEducational Decision Making. Dlm. Kelly, E. A., Lesh, R. A. & Baek, J. Y. Handbook of design research methods in education. 284-296. New York:Routledge.Brian, B. & Dan L, H. (2005). A Building-Block Approach For Implementing COSO'sEnterprise Risk Management-Integrated Framework. Management Accounting Quarterly, 6(2), 1-10.Bromiley, P., McShane, M., Nair, A. & Rustambekov, E. (2015). Enterprise RiskManagement: Review, Critique, and Research Directions. Long Range Planning, 48, 265-276.Bryan, L. A., Moore, T. J., Johnson, C. C., & Roehrig, G. H. (2016). Integrated STEM Education.Dlm. Johnson, C. C., Peters-Burton, E. E. & Moore, T. J. STEM Road Map: A Framework for IntegratedSTEM Education. 23-37. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.Burkus, D. (2013). Leading Creative: Research and Implications on LeadingCreative Work Teams. Strategic Leadership Review, 3(4), 109.Burkus, D., & Osula, B. (2011). Faulty Intel in the War for Talent: Replacing theAssumptions of Talent Management with Evidence-Based Strategies. Journal of Business StudiesQuarterly, 3(2), 1.Busemeyer, J.R., & Pleskac, T.J. (2009). Theoretical Tools for Understanding and AidingDynamic Decision Making. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 53(3), 126138.California Department of Education (2016). Innovate: A Blueprint For Science,Technology, Engineering, And Mathematics In California Public Education.Retrieved from http://www.cde.ca.gov/pd/ca/sc/documents/innovate.pdf.Carpenter, M, Bauer, T. & Erdogan, B. (2018, November 27). Management Principles.Retrieved from http://principles-v1.0.pdf.Cattell, R. B. (1978). The Scientific Use Of Factor Analysis in Behavioural and LifeSciences. New York: Plenum.Chang, P. L., Hsu, C. W., & Chang, P. C. (2011). Fuzzy Delphi Method for Evaluating HydrogenProduction Technologies. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36, 1417214179.Cheng, C.H., & Lin, Y. (2002). Evaluating the Best Main Battle Tank Using FuzzyDecision Theory with Linguistic Criteria Evaluation. European Journal ofOperational Research, 142(1), 174-186.Chin, W. W. (1998). The Partial Least Square Approach for Structural Equation Modelling.Dlm. G. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern Methods for Business Research.295-358. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Chu, H. & Hwang, G. (2008). A Delphi-Based Approach to Developing Expert Systems with theCooperation of Multiple Experts. Experts Systems with Application, 34(28), 26-40.Clayton, M. (1997). Delphi: A Technique to Harness Expert Opinion for Critical DecisionMaking Tasks in Education. Educational Psychology, 17(4), 373- 384.Clough, M. P., Berg, C. A. & Olson, J. K. (2009). Promoting Effective Science Teacher Education and Science Teaching: A Framework for Teacher Decision- Making. InternationalJournal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7, 821- 847.Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. (2?? Ed.).Hillsdale New Jersey: Lawrence Earlbaumm Associates.Cohen, L, Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2000). Research Method in Education. BritishJournal of Education Study, 48(4), 446-446.Comrey, A. L. (1973). A First Course in Factor Analysis. New York: Academic.Cooper, D. R. & Schindler, P. S. (2006). Business Research Methods. (9?? Ed.). USA:McGraw-Hill.Cornwall, A. & Jewkes, R. (1995). What is Participatory Research? Social Science and Medicine,41(12), 1667-1676.Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and EvaluatingQuantitative and Qualitative Research. (4?? Ed.) New Jersey: MerillPrentice Hall.Creswell, J.W. & Clark, V.L.P. (2007). Designing And Conducting Mixed Methods Research.California: Sage Publications.Cruz, S. (2018). What Are The Five Component Of COSO Framework? Retrieved fromhttp://info.knowledgeleader.com/bid/161685/what-are-the-five-components-of-the- coso-framework.Cuyvers, K. Weerd, G. D., Dupont, S., Mols, S., & Nuytten, C. (2018). Well-Being At School: Does Infrastructure Matter? Retrieved fromhttps://www.oecd.org/education/innovationeducation/centreforeffectivelearningen vironmentscele/49167628.pdf.Daniel, K. & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk.Econometrica, 47(2), 263-269.Dathwade, B. P. (2016). People Decision Making At Various Levels. EuropeanJournal of Advances in Engineering and Technology, 3(7), 24-27.Davis, R. A. & Mikosch, T. (2009). Extreme Value Theory for GARCH Processes.Dlm. Andersen, T. G, Davis, T. G., Kriess, R. A. & Mikosh. J. P. Handbook ofFinancial Time Series. 187-200. Switzerland: Springer.Davis, P. K., Kulick, J. & Egner, M. (2018). Human Decision Making. Implications of Modern DecisionScience for Military Decision-Support Systems. 5-22. Retrieved fromhttp://www.jstor.org.ezpustaka2.upsi.edu.my/stable/pdf/10.7249/mg360af.10.pdf?refreqid=search%3Abba0b26f4fee6ea696c76b8fa62dce55.Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination of Human Behavior.New York: Plenum.Derue, D. S., Nahrgang, J. D., Wellman, N. & Humphrey, S. E. (2011). Trait andBehavioral Theories of Leadership: An Integration and Meta-Analytic Test of Their RelativeValidity. Personnel Psychology, 64, 752.Desy, E. A., Peterson, S. A. & Brockman, V. (2011). Gender Differences in ScienceRelated Attitudes and Interest among Middle School and High School Students. Falls, 20(2), 23-30.Dimopoulos, I.D. & Pantis, D.J. (2003). Knowledge and Attitudes Regarding Sea Turtles in Elementary Students on Zakynthos Greece. Journal of Environmental Education, 34(3),30-38.Donohoe, H. M & Needham, R. D. (2009). Moving Best Practice Forward: DelphiCharacteristics, Advantages, Potential Problems and Solution. International Journal ofTourism Research, 11, 415-437.Doyle, J. (1998). Rational Decision Making: The MIT Encyclopaedia of the CognitiveSciences. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Durando, M. (2018). Towards 2020 Priorities for STEM Education and Careers in Europe. Retrieved from http://www.ingeniousscience.eu/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=64d8c2fe-a4ea-449c-b6d7-15d21dd44f0f &groupId=10136.Durham College (2018). Integrated Risk Management Framework. Retrieved fromhttps://durhamcollege.ca/wp-content/uploads/policy-integrated-risk-management- framework.pdf.Dweck, C. (2006). Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. Random House: New York.Eagle, R. (2002). New Frontiers for ARCH Models. Journal of Applied Economics,17(5), 425-446.Eastwood, L. & Ormondroyd, C. (2005). Risk and Education: A Distortion of Reality. Dlm. Hope, Andrew & Oliver, P. Risk, Education and Culture. 32-45.England: Ashgate.Eberly, M. B., Johnson, M. D., Hernandez, M. & Avolio, B. J. (2013). An Integrative Process Modelof Leadership: Examining Loci, Mechanisms, and Event Cycles. American Psychologist, 68(60), 427443.Eccles, J. S., Lord, S. E., Roeser, R. W., & Barber, B. L., (1997). The Associationof School Transitions in Early Adolescence with Developmental Trajectories throughHigh School. Dlm. J. Schulenberg, & J. L. Maggs (Eds.), Health Risks and Developmental Transitions during Adolescence. 283-320. New York: University Press.Else-Quest, N. M., Mineo, C. C. & Higgins, A. (2013). Math and Science Attitudes andAchievement at the Intersection of Gender and Ethnicity. Psychology of Women Quarterly,37(3): 293-309.Elson, R. J., OCallaghan, S. & Walker, J. P. (2015). Integrating Corporate Governance Concepts in the Classroom with the Risk Assessment Project. Journalof Instructional Pedagogies, 17, 1-15.Eppley, K. (2017). Rural Science Education as Social Justice. Cultural Studies of Rural ScienceEducation, 12, 4552.Epstein, J. L (2010). School/Family/Community Partnerships: Caring For theChildren We Share. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(9), 705-712.Epstein, J. L. (2001). School, Family and Community Partnership: Preparing Educators and ImprovingSchools. Westview: Boulder, Co.Esmaeil, H., Rozita, Z. & Amir, H. M. (2013). The relationship between EmotionalIntelligence and Personality Features With Job Satisfaction Status of Male Junior High SchoolTeachers In Islamshahr City. Journal of Educational and Management Studies. 3(3), 205-214.Espinoza, K. (2012). Challenges of Risk Management in School Districts. American SchoolBoard Journal, 1-3.Eyal, O., Berkovich, I. & Schwartz, T. (2011). Making the Right Choices: EthicalJudgments among Educational Leaders. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(4), 396-413.Faitar, G. M. & Faitar, S. L. (2013). Gender Gap and STEM Career Choices in 21stCentury American Education. Social and Behavioral Sciences. 106, 1265-1270.Fatin Aliah Phang, Mohd. Salleh Abu, Mohammad Bilal Ali & Salmiza Salleh (2014). Faktor PenyumbangKepada Kemerosotan Penyertaan Pelajar Dalam Aliran Sains: Satu Analisis Sorotan Tesis. SainsHumanika, 2(4), 6371.Ferrell, 0. C., & Gresham, L. G. (1985). A Contingency Framework for Understanding ion Making InMarketing. Journal of Marketing, 49(3), 87-96.Fink, A. (2003). How To Manage, Analyze And Intepret Survey Data. California: SAGEPublication Inc.Flink, C.A, & Searns, R.M. (1993). Greenway: A Guide To Planning, Design, AndDevelopment. Washington USA: Island Press.Flook, L., Repetti, R. L., & Ullman, J. B. (2005). Classroom Social Experiences AsPredictors Of Academic Performance. Developmental psychology. 41(2), 31- 327.Forester-Miller, H. & Davis, T. (1996). A Practitioner's Guide to Ethical DecisionMaking. USA: American Counseling Association.Fortemps, P., & Reubens, M. (1996). Ranking And Defuzzications Methods Based Area Compensation.Fuzzy Sets and System, 82(3), 319-330.Forza, C. (2002). Survey Research in Operations Management: A Process BasedPerspective. International Journal of Operation and Production Management, 22(2), 152-194.Fraenkel, J. R. & Wallen, E. N. (1996). How to Design and Evaluate Research. New York: McGraw-Hill.Fraenkel, J. R. & Wallen, N. E. (2003). How To Design and Evaluate Research InEducation. (5th Ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill.Fullan, M. (2002). Principals as Leaders in a Culture of Change. EducationalLeadership, 59(8), 16-21.Fullan, M. (2006). Change theory: A force for school improvement. Australia: Centre forStrategic Education.Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers CollegePress.Fulton, K. & Britton, T. (2016). Learning Communities: From Good Teacher To Great Teaching.National Commission on Teaching and Americas Future, Washington. Retrieved from www.nctaf.org .Gafoor, K. A. & Narayan, S. (2012). Out-Of-School Categories Influencing Interest inScience of Upper Primary Students by Gender and Locale: Exploration on an Indian Sample.Science Education International, 23(3), 191-204.Galway, G. & Sheppard, B. (2015). Research and Evidence in Education Decision- Making:A Comparison of Results from Two Pan-Canadian Studies. Education Policy Analysis Archives,23(109), 1-41.Gavora, P. (2011). Measuring the Self-Efficacy of In-Service Teacher in Slovakia. Orbis olae, 5(2),79-94.Gay, L. R. & Arasian, P. (2003). Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application. (7th Ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education.Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2011). Educational Research: Competencies forAnalysis and Applications (10th Ed.). Upper Saddle Ridge, New Jersey: Pearson Publishing.Geel, M. V., Keuning, T., Visscher, A. J. & Fox, J. (2016). Assessing the Effects of aSchool-Wide Data-Based Decision-Making Intervention on Student Achievement Growth in Primary Schools. American Educational Research Journal, 53(2), 360394.Geisser, S. (1974). A Predictive Approach to the Random Effect Model. Biometrika,61(1), 101-107.Ghazali Darusalam & Sufean Hussin (2016). Metodologi Penyelidikan dalamPendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Malaya.Glasser, W. (1999). Choice theory: A New Psychology of Personal Freedom. New York:Harper Collins.Gorsuch, R. L. (1988). Exploratory Factor Analysis. Handbook of MultivariateExperimental Psychology. 231-258. Boston: Springer.Gorze-Mitka, I. & Okreglicka, M. (2014). Improving Decision Making In ComplexityEnvironment. Procedia Economics and Finance, 16, 402 409.Griffith, A. L. (2016, Mac 13). Persistence Of Women and Minorities In STEM Field Majors: Is ItThe School Matters. Working paper. Cornel University ILR School. Retrieved fromhttp://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/workingpapers.Grinblatt, M., & Han, B. (2005). Prospect Theory, Mental Accounting, andMomentum. Journal of Financial Economics, 78(2), 311-339.Guilford, J. P. (1954). Psychometric Methods (2?? Ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. Gulcan, M. G.(2008). Participating the Decision Making Process in EducationalManagement. World Applied Sciences Journal, 3(6), 939-944.Gunderson, E. A., Ramirez, G., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2016, Jun 6). The Role of Parentsand Teachers in the Development of Gender Related Math Attitudes. Retrieved fromhttp://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11199-011-9996.Gupta, M. (2016). A Study of Principles Decision Making Style and Its Relationship with TeachersProfessional Growth and Organizational Health, In Government and Private Schools. International Research Journal of Management Sociologyumanities. 7(8), 2277-9809.Habegger, B. (2008). Risk Analysis and Management in a Dynamic Risk Landscape. Dlm.Wenger, A., Mauer, V. & Cavelty, M. D. International Handbook on Risk Analysia and Management. 13-32. Switzerland: Center for Security Studies.Hackett, G. & Betz, N. E. (1989). An Exploration of the Mathematics Self-Efficacy /Mathematics Performance Correspondence. Journal for Research in MathematicsEducation, 20, 261-273.Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet.Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139151.Hair, J., F., Black, W., C., Babin, B., J., Anderson, R., E., & Tatham R., L.(2010).Multivariate Data Analysis. (7?? Ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.Halpern, D. F., Benbow, C. P., Geary, D. C., Gur, R. C., Hyde, J. S., & Gernsbacher,M. A. (2007). The Science of Sex Differences in Science and Mathematics.Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8, 151.Haris Md. Jadi (1991). Reformasi Kurikulum Di Malaysia: Satu Pandangan Ke Atas ProsesPerancangan, Pembinaan dan Pelaksanaannya. Pendidik dan Pendidikan, 11, 1-15.Harrison, C. (2018). Leadership Teory and Research. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68672-1_2.Heckmann, I., Comes, T., & Nickel, S. (2015). A Critical Review on Supply Chain Risk Definition,Measure and Modeling. Omega, 52, 119-132.Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design Science Research inInformation Systems. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 28(1), 75- 105.Hillson, D. A. (1997). Towards a Risk Maturity Model. The International Journal of Project &Risk Business Management, 1(1), 35-45.Holmes, S. & Wolfe, E. W. (2017). Patterns in the Initial Teaching Assignments ofSecondary English Teachers: Implications for Teacher Agency and Retention. The NewEducator, 13(1), 22-40.Honig, M. I. & Coburn, C. (2008). Evidence-Based Decision Making In School District Central Offices: Toward A Policy And Research Agenda Evidence-Based. Educational Policy,22(4), 578-608.Honig, M. I. (2006). Street-Level Bureaucracy Revisited: Frontline District Central OfficeAdministrators As Boundary Spanners In Education Policy Implementation.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28(4), 357-383.Hoover-Dempsey & Sandler (2007). Parents Motivation for Involvement inChildrens Education: An Empirical Test of a Theoretical Model of Parental Involvement.Journal of Education Psychology, 99(3), 532-544.Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., & Sandler, H. M. (1995). Parental Involvement inChildrens Education: Why Does It Make a Difference? Teachers College Record, 97,310 331.Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., Walker, J. M. T., Sandler, H. M., Whetsel, D., Green, C. L.,Wilkins, A. S., & Closson, K. E. (2005). Why Do Parents Become Involved? ResearchFindings and Implications. Elementary School Journal, 106, 105130.Hsu, C. & Sandford, B. (2007). The Delphi Technique: Making Sense of Consensus.Practical, Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 12(10), 1-8.Hussein Mahmood (2008). Kepemimpinan dan Keberkesanan Sekolah. (2?? Ed.). Kuala Lumpur: DewanBahasa dan Pustaka.Illeris, K. (2003). Towards a Contemporary and Comprehensive Theory of Learning.International Journal of Lifelong Education, 22(4), 396-406.Ing, M. (2013). Gender Differences in the Influence of Early Perceived Parental Support on StudentMathematics and Science Achievement and STEM Career Attainment. International Journal of Scienceand Mathematics Education, 12(5), 1221-1239.Intan Bayani Zakaria, Mohamad Redhuan Mohamed, Nadira Ahzahar & Siti ZubaidahHashim (2015). A Study on Leadership Skills of Project Manager for a Successful Construction Project. International Academic Research Journal of Social Science, 1(2),89-94.Ishikawa, A., Amagasa, M., Shiga, T. Tomozawa, G., Tatsuta, R. & Meino, H. (1993). The Max-MinDelphi Method and Fuzzy Delphi Method via Fuzzy Integration. Fuzzy Set and System, 55(30),241-253.Jackson, S. L. (2006). Research Method and Statistics: A Critical Thinking Approach.USA: Thomson Wadsworth.Jacobsen, R., & Young, T. V. (2013). The New Politics of Accountability: Research inRetrospect and Prospect. Educational Policy, 27(2), 155-169.Jerome, N. (2013). Application of the Maslows Hierarchy Of Need Theory: Impacts andImplications On Organizational Culture, Human Resource and Employees Performance. International Journal of Business and Management Invention, 2(3), 39-45.Johari Hassan & Norsuriani Abdul Aziz (2016). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Minat TerhadapMatematik Di Kalangan Pelajar Sekolah Menengah. Retrieved fromhttp://eprints.utm.my/11972/Faktor.pdf.Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2012). Educational Research Quantitative, Qualitative, and MixedApproaches (4?? Ed.). Alabama: SAGE Publications Inc.Johnson, C. C., & Sondergeld, T. A. (2016). Effective STEM Professional Development. Dlm. C. C.Johnson, E. E. Peters-Burton, & T. J. Moore (Eds.), STEM road map: A Framework for IntegratedSTEM Education. 203-210. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical Decision Making By Individuals in Organizations: AnIssue-Contingent Model. The Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366-395.Josanov-Vrgovic, I. & Pavlovic, N. (2014). Relationship between the SchoolPrincipal Leadership Style and Teachers Job Satisfaction in Serbia.Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 10(1), 43-57.Joseph, F. H., William, C. B., Barry, J. B., & Rolph, E. A. (2010). MultivariateData Analysis: A Global Perspective. New Jersey: Pearson Education.Joseph, F. H., G Tomas, M. H., Christian, M. R., & Marko, S. (2014). A Primer onPartial Least Square Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM). California USA: SAGE Publications.Kacelnik, A. (1997). Normative and Descriptive Model of Decision Making: Time Discounting and Risk Sensitivity. Dlm. Bork, R. G. & Cardew, G. CharacterizingHuman Psychology Adaptations. 51-70. England: John Wiley & Sons.Kamisah Othman, Zanaton Ikhsan & Lilia Halim (2007). Sikap Terhadap Sains dan SikapSaintifik Di Kalangan Pelajar Sains. Jurnal Pendidikan, 32, 39-60.Kasperson, R. E., Renn, O., Slovic, P., Brown, H. S., Emel, J., Goble, R., Kasperson,J.X. & Ratick. S. (1988). The Social Amplification of Risk A Conceptual Framework. RiskAnalysis, 8(2), 177-187.Kasprzhak, A. G. & Bysik, N. V. (2015). Decision Making Styles of Russian SchoolPrinciples. Russian Education and Society, 57 (7), 590-613.Katehi, L., Pearson, G. & Feder, M. (2009). Engineering in K-12 Education:Understanding the Status and Improving the Prospects. Washington: The NationalAcademies Press.Katz, I., Assor, A., Kanat-Maymon, Y. & Bereby-Meyer, Y. (2006). Interest As AMotivational Resource: Feedback and Gender Matter, But Interest Makes The Difference.Social Psychology of Education, 9, 2742.Katz, R. L. (1955). Skills of an Effective Administrator. Harvard Business Review, 3(1), 342.Kaur, A. (2013). Maslows Need Hierarchy Theory: Applications and Criticisms. GlobalJournal of Management and Business Studies, 3(10), 1061-1064.Kaur, K., Kaur, A. & Kaur, R. (2014). Study of Different Risk Management Model and Risk Knowledge Acquisition with WEKA. International Journal of Engineering Researchand General Science, 2(4), 26-35.Kaya, I., Kahraman, C. & ebi, S. (2012). Computational Intelligence Techniques for RiskManagement in Decision Making. Dlm. Lu, J., Jain, L. C. & Zhang, G. Handbook onDecision Making. 9-38. Berlin: Springer.Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia (2012). Laporan Strategi Mencapai Dasar 60:40 Aliran STEM/Teknikal:Sastera. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia (2012). Pendidikan Di Malaysia: MemartabatkanKecemerlangan Pendidikan Negara. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (2013). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia (2013-2025).Putrajaya: Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (2013).Buku Perangkaan Pendidikan 2013.Putrajaya: Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (2014). Buku Perangkaan Pendidikan 2014.Putrajaya: Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (2015). Buku Perangkaan Pendidikan 2015.Putrajaya: Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (2015). Laporan Pencapaian Inisiatif Pengukuhan STEM PelanPembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia Gelombang 1 (2013-2015). Putrajaya: Kementerian PelajaranMalaysia.Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (2015). Pertimbangan Dasar 60:40. Putrajaya:Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (2016). Quick Facts 2016. Putrajaya: Kementerian PelajaranMalaysia.Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (2016). Laporan Inisiatif Perkukuhan STEM 2016.Putrajaya: Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (2016). Laporan TIMSS 2015: Trends inInternational Mathematics and Science Study. Putrajaya: BPPDP Kementerian PelajaranMalaysia.Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (2016). PISA 2015: Programme for International ssment.Putrajaya: BPPDP Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (2019). Quick Fact 2019: Malaysia EducationalStatistics. Putrajaya: BPPDP Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi (2007). Malaysian Higher Education Statistics 2007.Putrajaya: Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi.Kersten, G. E., Mikolajuk, Z. & Yeh, A. G. (2000). Decision Support Systems forSustainable Development: A Resource Book of Method and Application. Kanada: KluwerAcademic Publisher.Kerzner, H. R. (2013). Projects Management: A System Approach to Planning,Scheduling and Controlling. (11?? Ed.). Chichester UK: Wiley.Kier, M. W., Blanchard, M. R., Osborne, J. W. & Albert, J. L. (2014). The Development of the STEMCareer Interest Survey (STEM-CIS). Research in Science Education, 44(3), 461-481.Klein, G. & Klinger, D. (2008). Naturalistic Decision Making. Journal of the HumanFactors and Ergonomics Society, 2(1), 16-19.Klein, G. (1998). Sources of Power: How People Make Decisions. MIT Press:Cambridge.Klein, G. (2008). Naturalistic Decision Making. Human Factors, 50(3), 456460.Klein, J. D. (2014). Design and Development Research: A Rose by another Name. Kertaskerja dibentangkan dalam Mesyuarat Tahunan American Education Research Association(AERA). Philadelphia, USA.Klien, G. & Klinger, D. (1991). Naturalistic Decision Making. Human Systems IAC Gateway,29(1), 1-4.Krapp, A. (2003). Interest and Human Development: An Educational-Psychological Perspective.Development and Motivation, 2, 57-84.Krejcie, R. V. & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610.Lal, P., Lim-Applegate, H., & Scoccimarro, M. (2002). The Adaptive Decision-Making Process as a Tool for Integrated Natural Resource Management Focus, Attitudes, and Approach.Conservation Ecology, 5(2), 11Lasky, S., Datnow, A. & Stringfield, S. (2005). Linkages between Federal, State andLocal Levels in Educational Reform. Dlm. Bascia, N, Cumming, A., Datnow, A., Leithwood, K. &Livingstone, D. International Handbook of Educational Policy.6. (Eds.). Great Britain: Springer.Leaper, C., Farkas, T. & Brown, C. S (2012). Adolescent Girls Experiences andGender-Related Beliefs In Relation To Their Motivation in Math/Science and English.Journal Youth Adolescence, 2, 68-282.Lee Bin Saat & Shukri Zain (2016). Pengaruh Kepimpinan Instruksional, Efikasi dan TugasRutin Pengetua Terhadap Pencapaian Akademik. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences andHumanities, 1(3), 42 - 65.Leech, B. L. (2002). Asking Questions: Techniques for Semi StructuredInterviews. Political Science and Politics, 35(4), 665-668.Leflot, G., Onghena, P. & Colpin, H, (2010). Teacher-Child Interactions: Relations withChildrens Self-Concept in Second Grade. Infant and child development. 19(4), 385-405.Lemos, F. (2017). On Risk-Building a Definition. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2734050.Leoveanu, A. C. (2013). Rationalist Model in Public Decision Making. Journal of PublicAdministration, Finance and Law, 4, 43-54.Levin, R. I. & Rubin, S. (2000). Statistik untuk Pengurusan. Petaling Jaya:Prentice Hall.Lilia Halim 2013. Pendidikan Sains dan Pembangunan Masyarakat Berliterasi Sains.Bangi:Universiti Kebangsaan MalaysiaLingard, B. & Rawolle, S. (2011). New Scalar Politics: Implications for EducationPolicy. Comparative Education, 47(4), 489502.Lipshitz, R., Klien, G., Oranasu, J. & Salas, E. (2001). Taking Stock of NaturalisticDecision Making. Journal of Behavioural Decision Making, 14(5), 331-352.Loewenstein, G. & Lerner, J. S. (2003). The Role of Affect in Decision Making. Handbook ofEffective Science. 619-642. Pennsylvania: Carnegie Mellon University.Lostant Elementary School (2017). Risk management plan. Retrieved fromhttps://www.lostantcomets.org/vimages/shared/./Risk%20Management%20Plan.p df.Loyens, S. M. M., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Schmidt, H.G. (2006). Students Conceptions of Constructivist Learning: A Comparison between a Traditional and a Problem-BasedLearning Curriculum. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 11, 36579.Lu, J., Jain, L. C., & Zhang, G (2012). Risk Management in Decision Making. Handbook ision Making.3-7. Berlin: Springer.Lunenberg, F. C. (2010). The Decision Making Process. National Forum ofEducational Administration and Supervision Journal, 27(4), 1-12.Lyman, H. B. (1986). Test Scores And What They Mean. (4?? Ed.). New Jersey: PrenticeHall.Mac Callum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample Size inFactor Analysis. Psychology Methods, 4(1), 84-99.Makki, M.H., Abd-El-Khalick, F. & Boujaoude, S. (2003). Lebanese Secondary School Student Environmental Knowledge and Attitude. Environmental Education Research, 9(1), 21-33.Maryam Temitayo Ahmed & Habeeb Omotunde (2012). Theories and Strategies of Good Decision Making. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 1(10),51-54.Maslow, A. H. (1943). A Theory of Human Motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370-396.McCall, M. (2017). Elementary Preservice Science Teaching Efficacy and Attitude TowardScience: Can A College Science Course Make A Difference? Journal of Science Education.21(6), 1-11.McDermott, L. (2018). Volatility in Financial Time Series. Retrieved fromhttp://slideplayer.com/slide/781179/McMillan, J. H. & Schumacker, S. (1989). Research in Education: A ConceptualIntroduction. (2?? Ed.). Glenview, Illinois: Scoot Foresman and Company.McNally, J. S. (2013). The 2013 COSO Framework and SOX Compliance: One Approach to anEffective Transition. Durham, North Carolina: The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations ofthe Tread way Commission.Meor Ibrahim Kamaruddin & Nurul Amira Ahmad (2017). Persepsi Guru Sains Terhadap KaedahPembelajaran Koperatif (PK) Berdasarkan Kemahiran Sosial Pelajar Dan Minat Guru. Retrieved fromhttp://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/10242/2/Nurul_Amira_Binti_Ahmad.pdf.Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation.San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.Meso, P. & Robinson, J. M. (2002). A Review of Naturalistic Decision Making Research with Some Implications for Knowledge Management. Journal of Knowledge Management,6(1), 63-73.Meulbroek, L. (2002). The Promise and Challenge of Integrated Risk Management.Risk Management and Insurance Review, 5(1), 55-66.Miles, B. M. & Huberman, M. A. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded SourceBook. (2?? ed). California: Sage.Miller, K. D. & Waller, H. G. (2003). Scenarios, Real Options and Integrated RiskManagement. Long Range Planning, 36(1), 93-107Miller, K. D. (1992). A Framework for Integrated Risk Management in InternationalBusiness. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(2), 311-331.Miller, L. A., Lovler, R. L., & McIntire, S. A. (2013). Foundations of PsychologicalTesting: A Practical Approach (4?? Ed.). California: SAGE Publications Inc.Miller, R. L., Anton, C., Fullerton, D. A. & Maltby, J. (2002). SPSS for SocialScience. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Miron-Shatz, T., Golan, O., Brezis, M., Siegal. G. & Doniger, G. M. (2012). SharedDecision-Making In Israel: Status, Barriers, and Recommendations. Israel Journal ofHealth Policy Research, 1(5), 1-8.Mohd, Effendi @ Ewan Mohd. Matore, Hisyamsani Idris, Normawati Abdul Rahman & Ahmad Zamri Khairani (2017). Kesahan Kandungan Pakar Instrumen IKBAR bagi Pengukuran AQ Menggunakan Nisbah Kesahan Kandungan. Prosiding Antarabangsa Pendidikan Global V, PadangIndonesia.Mohd. Majid Konting (2005). Kaedah Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa danPustaka.Mohd. Nazri Abdul Rahman (2014). Pembangunan Model Home-schooling BerasaskanNilai Dan Amalan Masyarakat Bagi Kanak-Kanak Orang Asli. Tesis PhD. Kuala Lumpur: UniversitiMalaya.Mohd Noor Badlilshah Abdul Kadir, Mohd Mustamam Abdul Karim & Nurulhuda Abd. Rahman (2016). Sikap Pelajar Terhadap Pembelajaran Fizik Dan Hubungannya Dengan Pencapaian Dalam Kalangan Pelajar Sains. Jurnal Personalia Pelajar, 19, 31-51Mohd. Ridhuan Mohd Jamil, Saedah Siraj, Zaharah Hussin, Nurulrabihah & Ahmad ArifinSapar. (2014). Pengenalan Asas Kaedah Fuzzy Delphi dalam Penyelidikan RekaBentuk dan Pembangunan. Bangi: Minda Intelek.Mohd. Tafizam Mohd. Taib & Ramlee Mustapha (2017). Kemudahan Prasarana Dalam Pelaksanaan MataPelajaran Teknologi Kejuruteraan, Lukisan Kejuruteraan dan Reka Cipta Di Sekolah MenengahHarian Malaysia. Sains Humanika, 9, 1-5.Mohd. Yusri Ibrahim & Aziz Amin (2014). Model Kepemimpinan Pengajaran Pengetuadan Kompetensi Pengajaran Guru. Jurnal Kurikulum & PengajaranPasifik, 2(1), 11-25.Morgan, S. L., Gelbgiser, D. & Weeden, K. A. (2016, Mac 9). Feeding the Pipeline:Gender, Occupational Plans, and College Major Selection. Retrieved fromhttp://socweb.soc.jhu.edu/faculty/morgan/papers/Morgan_Gelbgiser_Weeden_ 110912.pdf.Muhammad Abdul Hadi Bunyamin (2019, Mei 12). Pendidikan STEM Bersepadu: Perspektif Global, Perkembangan Semasa Di Malaysia, dan Langkah Ke Hadapan. Retrieved fromhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/301567750Muhammad Sabri Sahrir, Nor Aziah Alias & Zawawi Ismail (2012). Employing Design and DevelopmentResearch (DDR) Approaches in the Design and Development of Online Arabic Vocabulary Learning GamesPrototype. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(2), 108-119.Mulford, B. (2005). Accountability Policies and Their Effects. Dlm. Bascia, N.,Cumming, A. Datnow, A, Leithmoow, K. & Livingstone, D. International Handbook ofEducational Policy. 281-294. Great Britain: Springer.Muller, R., Spang, K. & Ozcan, S. (2009). Cultural Differences in Decision Making In ProjectTeams. International Journal of Management in Project Business, 2,70-93.Myers, D. G. (2009). Social psychology (10?? Ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill HigherEducation.Noor Erma Abu & Leong Kwan Eu (2014). Hubungan Antara Sikap, Minat, Pengajaran Guru Dan PengaruhRakan Sebaya Terhadap Pencapaian Matematik Tambahan tingkatan 4. Jurnal Kurikulum & PengajaranAsia Pasifik. 2(1): 1-10.Nor Aniza Ahmad, Zalizan Mohd. Jelas & Manisah Mohd. Ali (2010). Understanding StudentsPerformance Based On Gender And and Types Of Schooling Using SEM. Procedia Social and BehavioralSciences, 7, 425429.Nor Atiqah, Demong, R. & Lu, J. (2012). Risk Based Decision Making Framework For Investment InThe Real Estate Industry. Dlm. Lu, J. Jain, L. C. & Zhang, G. Handbook on DecisionMaking. 259-283. Berlin: Springer.Norashikin Abu Bakar & Foo Say Fooi (2015). Hubungan Kepimpinan Guru Dengan Pencapaian Akademik Pelajar. International Journal of Education and Training, 1(2), 1-11.Norbahiah Misran, Sarifah Nurhanum Syed Sahuri, Norhana Arsad, Hafizah Hussain, NorazreenAbd Aziz & Wan Mimi Diyana Wan Zaki (2012). Pengaruh Gender Terhadap Pemilihan ProgramPengajian Kejuruteraan Dalam Kalangan Pelajar Matrikulasi Di Malaysia. Jurnal PendidikanMalaysia, 37(2), 29-34.Norisyah Abd. Rahim (2018). Pengaruh Kepimpinan Transformasi dan Budaya Terhadap OrganisasiPembelajaran Sekolah Menengah Imtiaz Di Malaysia. JurnalIlmi. 8, 64-89.Norusis, M. J. (2005). SPSS 13.0 Statistical Procedures Companion. New Jersey:Prentice Hall.Nunnally, J. C., (1978). Psychometric Theory. (2?? Ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Nurul Hudani Md. Nawi, Marof Redzuan, Puteri Hayati Megat Ahmad & Noor Hisham Md Nawi(2015). Pengujian Model Hubungan Antara Kecerdasan Emosi, Trait Personaliti Dan Tingkah Laku Kepimpinan Terhadap Prestasi Kerja. Akademika, 85(2), 3-16.Oliveira, A. (2007). A Discussion of Rational And Psychological Decision-Making TheoriesAnd Models: The Search For A Cultural-Ethical Decision-Making Model. Electronic Journalof Business and Ethics and Organization Studies, 12(2), 12-17.Othman Lebar. (2007). Penyelidikan Kualitatif-Pengenalan Kepada Teori dan Metod.Tanjung Malim: Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.Pallant, J. (2011). SPSS Survival Manual: A Step By Step Guide to Data Analysis Using SPSS. (2??Ed.). Australia: Allen & Unwin.Pallant, J. (2013). SPSS Survival Manual: A Step By Step Guide to Data Analysis Using IBM SPSS.(5?? Ed.). England; McGraw Hill.Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (3?? Ed.). London: Sage.Penketh, A & Hodgart, E. (2018, Januari 16). Why Everyone Trying Over Complicate Intergrated RiskManagement? Retrieved from https://www.croweclarkwhitehill.co.uk/integrated-risk-management/.Perancang Pelajaran Tinggi (1967). Penyata Jawatankuasa Perancang Pelajaran Tinggi.Kuala Lumpur: Pustaka Perdana.Perera, A. H., Drew, C. A. & Johnson, C. J. (2012). Expert Knowledge and ItsApplication in Landscape Ecology. New York: Springer.Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (1996). Motivation in Education: Theory, Research, andApplications. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall Inc.Polit, D. F., & Beck, C.T., & Owen, S. V. (2006). Is the CVI An Acceptable Indicator Of ContentValidity? Appraisal and Rrecommendations. Research in Nursing and Health, 30, 459467.Pratt, D. (1980). Curriculum Design and Development. New York: Harcourt Brace JovanovichInc.Pries-Heje, J., Venable, J. & Baskerville, R. (2014). RMF4DSR: A Risk Frameworkfor Design Science Research. Journal of Information Systems, 26(1), 57-82.Ramlan Mustapha & Ghazali Darusalam (2018). Aplikasi Kaedah Fuzzy Delphi DalamPenyelidikan Sains Sosial. Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Malaysia.Ramlan Mustapha (2017). Reka Bentuk Model Integriti Akademik Berasaskan PenghayatanRohani. Tesis PhD. Universiti Malaya.Ramlee Ismail, Jamal Yunus & Marinah Awang (2016). Analisis Data dan Pelaporan Dengan Menggunakan SPSS. Tanjong Malim: Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.Ramsey, L. R., Betz, D. E. & Sekaquaptewa, D. (2013). The Effects of An Academic EnvironmentIntervention on Science Identification among Women in STEM. Social Psychology of Education,16(3), 377-397.Rappleye, J., Imotob, Y. & Horiguchi, S. (2011). Towards Thick Description OfEducational Transfer: Understanding a Japanese Institutions Import Of EuropeanLanguage Policy. Comparative Education, 47(4), 411432.Razali Hassan, Halizah Awang, Badaruddin Ibrahim & Siti Hajar Zakariah (2013). Memacu Pelan Transformasi Pendidikan: Peranan IPTA Dalam Membantu Meningkatkan Kuantiti DanKualiti Pendidikan Aliran Sains Dan Teknikal Di Malaysia. Kertas Kerja Seminar Kebangsaan Kali ke-4 Majlis Dekan Pendidikan IPTA 2013. Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia, Selangor, 23-25 September.Razman Shah Rajab (2016). Virtual Reality Application and Industry 4.0. MyForesight, 8- 11.Reinhartz, J. & Beach, D. M. (2004). Educational Leadership, Changing Schools, ChangingRoles. New York: Pearson.Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory. New York: Praeger.Richey, R.C., Klein, J.D. & Nelson, W. A. (2018, Mac 20). Developmental Research:Studies of Instructional Design and Development. Retrieved fromhttps://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/aa37/bec70da65b27b3d76c9ccda8e9ad127ac16c. pdf .Richie, R.C., & Klein, J.D. (2007). Design and Development Research. New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbumm Associates.Riegel, B., Dickson, V. V. & Topaz, M. (2013). Qualitative Analysis of NaturalisticDecision Making In Adult with Chronic Heart Failure. Nursing Research, 62(2), 91-98.Riegle-Crumb, C., King, B., Grodsky, E. & Muller, C. (2012). The More Things ore They Stay the Same? Prior Achievement Fails To Explain Gender Inequality In Entry Into STEM College Majors Over Time.American Educational Research Journal, 49(6), 1048-1073.Riplova, K. (2007). Risk and Decision Making Process. Journal of Information, Controland Management Systems, 5(2), 331-336.Risk and Insurance Management Society (2018). Rims Risk Maturity Model (RMM) ForEnterprise Risk Management. Retrieved fromhttps://www.logicmanager.com/pdf/rims_rmm_executive_summary.pdfRizuan Mohd, Jamalullail Abdul Wahab & Nurwaina Rasit (2015). AmalanPengurusan Strategik Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Agama Di Tiga Buah Negeri Selatan Semenanjung Malaysia. Dlm. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Jurnal Penyelidikan Pendidikan. 27-37. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.Roehrig, G. H., Moore, J. T., Wang, H. H. & Park, M. S. (2012). Is Adding The EEnough? Investigating the Impact of K-12 Engineering Standards on theImplementation of STEM Integration. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 31-44.Rosenblatt, Z., Peretz, H. & Kremer-Hayon, L. (2015). Teacher Involvement inDecision Making In the Israeli School System. Dlm. Menlo, A. & Collet, L. (Eds.), doteachers wish to be agents of change? 151168. Boston: Sense Publishers.Rossi, E. (2018). GARCH models. Retrieved fromhttp://economia.unipv.it/pagp/pagine_personali/erossi/Econometria_Finanziaria_2013/Rossi_GARCH_Ec_Fin_2013.pdf.Roth, E. M. (1997). Analyzing Decision Making In Process Control: MultidisciplinaryApproach to Understanding and Aiding Human Performance in Complex Tasks. Dlm. Zsambok, C. E. &Klien, G. Naturalistic decision making. 121-130. Psychology Press: New York.Roy, S. (2016). Decision Making and Modelling In Cognitive Science. India: Springer. RozitaPaiman & Azlan Lin (2014). Keberkesanan Kepimpinan Transformasi DalamPembangunan Organisasi Sekolah. Dlm. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. JurnalPenyelidikan Pendidikan. 216-231. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia: Putrajaya.Rutter, G. (2018). The Basic Management. Retrived from http://yfcleadershipandpioneering.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/polc.pdfRuzic-Dimitrijevic, L. & Dakic, J. (2014). The Risk Management in Higher Educationnline Journal of Applied Knowledge Management, 2(1), 137-152Ryan, B., Joshua, B., Kristin, R. & Chris, M. (2011). Understanding STEM: CurrentPerceptions. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(6), 5-9.Sadler, P. M., Sonnert, G., Hazari, Z. & Tai, R. (2012). Stability and Volatility of STEM CareerInterest in High School: A Gender Study. Science Education, 96(3), 411- 427.Saedah Siraj, Norlidah Alias, Dorothy DeWitt & Zaharah Hussin. (2013). Design andDevelopment Research: Emergent Trend in Educational Research. Kuala Lumpur: PearsonMalaysia Sdn Bhd.Sahrir, M. S., Alias, N. A., Ismail, Z., & Osman, N. (2012). Employing Design andDevelopment Research (DDR) Approaches in the Design and Development of Online ArabicVocabulary Learning Games Prototype. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(2),108119.Sajid Ali (2006). Why Does Policy Fail? Understanding the Problems of PolicyImpementation in Pakistan- A Neuro-Cognitive Perspective. International Studies in EducationalAdministration, 34(1), 2-20.Salmah Mohd. Salleh, Nur Liyana Husna Shaari, Zainin Bidin, Herliana Yasin, Taufek Muhammad &Lanita Md Yusof (2016). Pertimbangan Dasar 60:40. Jurnal Penyelidikan Pendidikan, 1, 1-11.Sanders, M., Hyuksoo, K., Kyungsuk, P. & Hyonyong, L. (2011). Integrative STEM (Science,Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) Education: Contemporary Trends and Issues. SecondaryEducation, 59, 729.Schnabel, K. U., Alfeld, C., Eccles, J. S., Koller, O. & Baumert, J. (2002). ParentalInfluence on Students' Educational Choices in the United States and Germany: DifferentRamificationsSame Effect? Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 60(2), 178-198.Schoenfeld, A. H. (2011). How Wwe Think: A Theory Of Goal-Oriented Decision Making And ItsEducational Applications. New York: Routledge.Scott, J. (2000). Rational Choice Theory. Understanding Contemporary Society:Theories of the Present, 129, 671-85.Seezik, A., Poell, R. F. & Kirschner, P. A (2009). Teachers Individual Action Theories about Competence-Based Education: The Value of the CognitiveApprenticeship Model. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 61(2), 203 215.Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2011). Research Methods For Business: A Skill BuildingApproach (5?? Ed.). New Delhi: John Wiley & SonsShackman, J. D. (2013). The Use Of Partial Least Squares Path Modeling andGeneralized Structured Component Analysis In International Business Research: A Literature Review.International Journal of Management, 30(3), 78-85.Shapiro, C. S. & Sax, L. J. (2011). Major Selection and Persistence for Women inSTEM. New Direction for Institutional Research, 152, 5-18.Shapiro, J. R. & Williams, A. M. (2012). The Role Of Stereotype Threats In Undermining Girls andWomens Performance and Interest in STEM. Sex Roles, 66, 175- 183.Shen, J., Leslie, J. M., & Xin Ma, J. K. S. (2012). Are Principal Background And School ProcessesRelated To Teacher Job Satisfaction? A Multilevel Study Using Schools and Staffing Survey2003-04. American Educational Research Journal, 49(2), 200-230.Simon, H. A. (1979). Rational Decision Making in Business Organizations. TheAmerican Economic Review, 69(4), 493-513.Simon, H. A. (1997). Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision MakingProcess In Administrative Organization. (4?? Ed.). New York: The Free Press.Skulmoski, G. J., & Hartman, F. T. (2007). The Delphi Method for Graduate Research.Journal of Information Technology Education, 6(1), 121.Smetana, J. G., Metzger, A., Gettman, D. C. & Campione-barr, N. (2006). Disclosure and Secrecyin Adolescent-Parent Relationships. Child Development, 77, 201- 217.Spangler, M. B. (1987). Policy Issues Related To Worst Case Risk Analyses And The EstablishmentOf Acceptable Standards Of De Minimise Risk. Dlm. Covello, V. T., Lave, L. B., Moghissi, A. & Uppuluri, V. R. R. Uncertainty in risk assessment, risk management, and decision making. 1-26. New York: Plenum Press.Spillane, J. P., Resier, B. J. & Reimer, T. (2010). Policy Implimentation and Cognition: Reframing And Refocusing Implementation Research. Review of EducationResearch, 72(3), 387-431.Stake, R. E. (2004). Standards-Based and responsive Evaluation. London: Sage Sternberg, R. J.,Jarvin, L., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2011). Explorations in Giftedness.New York: Cambridge University Press.Stingl, V. & Geraldi, J. (2017). Errors, Lies and Misunderstandings: Systematic Review onBehavioural Decision Making In Projects. International Journal of Projectagement, 35, 121135.Stone, M. (1974). Cross-validation and Multinominal Prediction. Biometrika, 61(3),509-515.Suhara, A., Ito, M., Ishiguro, Y., Iomoto, T. & Oshima, Y. (2017). Introduction ofSupporting Framework for Motivated High School Students Research Activity on Environment Safetyand Risk. Journal of Environment and Safety, 6(2), 97-98Sun, P. & Zhou, C. (2018). How to Apply GARCH Model in Risk Management? Model Diagnosis on GARCH Innovations. Retrieved fromhttp://www.efmaefm.org/0efmameetings/efma%20annual%20meetings/2012- Barcelona/papers/SunZhou[2012],Supian Hashim & Khadijah Daud (2014). Amalan Kepimpinan Lestari DanHubungannya Dengan Prestasi Kerja Guru Sekolah Rendah Yang Menerima Tawaran Baru Di DaerahSegamat. Sains Humanika, 2(4), 197208.Tabachnick, B., G. & Fidell, L., S. (2007). Using Multivariate Statistics (5?? Ed.).Pearson/Allyn & Bacon: Boston.Tang, C. W. & Wu. C. T. (2010). Obtaining A Picture Of Undergraduate EducationQuality: A Voice From Inside The University. Higher Education, 60, 269286.Thiel, C. E., Bagdasarov, Z., Harkrider, L., Johnson, J. F. & Mumford, M. D. (2012). LeaderEthical Decision-Making in Organizations: Strategies for Sense Making. Journal Business Ethics,107, 4964.Thomaidis, N.S., Nikitakos, N., & Dounias, G.D. (2006). The Evaluation ofInformations Technology Projects: A Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision-Making Approach.International Journal of Information & Decision Making, 5(1), 89- 122.Tracey, M. W. (2007). Design and Development Research: A Model Validation Case.Educational Technology Research & Development, 57(4), 553-571.Tracey, D. H. & Morrow, L. M. (2006). Lences on Reading: An Introduction to Theories and Models.New York: The Guilford Press.Trevino, L. K. (1986). Ethical Decision Making In Organization: A Person SituationInteractionist Model. The Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 601-617.Tuanku Sarah Tuanku Mohd, Jiwa (1997). Pembinaan Model Penerapan Nilai di dalam Pengajaran danInstitusi Pengajian Tinggi. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.Tufano, P. (2011). Managing Risk in Higher Education. Forum for the Future of Higher Education,54-58.Turner, D. W. (2010). Qualitative Interview Design: A Practical Guide for NoviceInvestigators. The Qualitative Report, 15(3), 754760.Turoff, M. (1970). The Design of a Policy Delphi. Technological Forecasting and SocialChange, 2(2), 80-96.Turpin, S. M. & Marais, M. A. (2004). Decision Making: Theory and Practice.Journal of the Operation Research Society of South Africa, 20(2), 143-160.Ulrich, K.T., Eppinger, S.D., & Goyal, A. (2011). Product Design and Development. (2??Ed.) New York USA: Mc Graww Hill.US Department of Education (2015). Mathematics and Science Partnerships. U.S. Departmentof Education: Washington.Van den Ekker, J. (1999). Principles and Methods of Development Research. Dlm. Van den Ekker, J.,Branch, R. M., Gustafon, K. Nieveen, N. & Plomp, T. Design approaches and tools ineducations and training. 1-14. Springer.Van Der Sluis, M. E., Reezigt, G. R. & Borghans, L. (2017). Implementing New Public Management inEducational Policy. Educational Policy, 31(3), 303329.Van-Gelder, J. L., Elffers, H., Reynald, D. & Nagin, D. S. (2013). Affect and Cognition in Criminal Decision Making. London: Routledge.Vlez, S. C., Lorenzo, M. C. A. & Garri, J. M. M. (2017). Leadership: Its Importance In theManagement of School Coexistence. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 237, 169 174.Vroom, V. H. & Yetton, P. W. (1981). Leadership and Decision Making. USA: University ofPittsburgh Press.Wandee, M., Sirisuthi, C & Leamvijarn, S. (2017). The Study Elements andIndicators of Risk Management System for Secondary Schools in Thailand. InternationalEducation Studies, 10(3), 154-164.Wang, M. & Degol, J. (2013). Motivational Pathways to STEM Career Choices: Using ExpectancyValuePerspective to Understand Individual and Gender Differences in STEM Fields. Developmental Review,33, 304340.Wang, X. (2013). Why Students Choose STEM Mmajor: Motivation, High School Learning andPostsecondary Context Of Support. American Education Journal, 50(5), 1081-1121.Weeden, K. A., Gelbgiser, D. & Morgan, S. L. (2016). Pipeline Dreams? GenderDifferences in Occupational Plans and STEM Major Completion among Recent Cohort of US College Entrants. Retrieved fromhttps://paa2015.princeton.edu/papers/152239.Weinberg, R. S & dan Gould, D. (1999). Foundations of Sports and ExercisePsychology. (2?? Ed.). Champaign, Illinois: Human Kinetics.Widhyanti, R. & Shahril @ Charil, M. (2016). Headmaster Instructional Leadership And OrganizationalLearning On The Quality Of Madrasah And The Quality Of Graduates The State MadrasahAliyah At Jakarta Capital Region. Higher Education Studies. 6(1), 159-168.Wiersma, W. (2000). Research Method in Education-An Introduction. (7?? Ed.) Boston: Allyn andBacon.Williams, B. K. (2011). Adaptive Management of Natural Resources-Framework and Issues.Journal of environmental management, 92(5), 1346-1353.Williams, B., Brown, T., & Onsman, A. (2012). Exploratory Factor Analysis: A Five- StepGuide for Novices. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine, 8(3), 1-13.Wilson, S. M. & Peterson, P. L. (2006). Theories Of Learning and Teaching: What Do They Mean ForEducation? National Education Association: Washington DCWolinski, S. (2018, April 25). Leadership Theories. Retrieved fromhttps://managementhelp.org/blogs/leadership/2010/04/21/leadership-theories/Wong, K. K. (2013). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) TechniquesUsing Smart PLS. Marketing Bulletin, 24(1), 1-32.Yamada, S. (2008). Educational Borrowing as Negotiation: Re-Examining the Influenceof the American Black Industrial Education Model on British Colonial Education in Africa.Comparative Education. 44(1), 2137.Yazilitas, D., Svensson, J., Vries, G. D. & Saharso, S. (2013). Gendered Study Choice: ALiterature Review. A Review of Theory and Research into the Unequal Representation ofMale and Female Students in Mathematics, Science and technology. Educational Researchand Evaluation, 1-21.Yildirim, K. & Ates, S. (2012). Turkish Pre-Service Teachers Perceived Self-EfficacyBeliefs And Knowledge About Using Expository Text As An Instructional Tool In Their FutureClassroom Settings. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(8), 12-31.Yin, K. R. (1994). Case Study Research: Design and Method. (2?? Ed.). California:Sage.Young, T. & Lewis, W. D. (2015). Educational Policy Implementation Revisited.Educational Policy, 29(1), 317.Yurtseven, M. K. & Buchanan, W. W. (2016). Decision Making and Systems Thinking: Educational Issues. American Journal of Engineering Education,1), 19-28.Zainal Aaalam Hassan & Ura Pin @ Chum (2014). Penilaian Dalam Dasar Pendidikan DiMalaysia: Suatu Tinjauan. Dlm. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Jurnal PenyelidikanPendidikan. 1-13.Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.Zainal Abidin Talib, Hussein Baqiah & Yahya Ameen Tayeb (2018). Current Status andTrends of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM). dlm Department of Higher Education. STEM education in Malaysia. 9-38. Putrajaya: Ministry of HigherEducation.Zainudin Abu Bakar, Meor Ibrahim Kamaruddin, Megat Aman Zahiri Megat Zakaria & Mohd. Ali Ibrahim. (2007). Kemahiran ICT Guru Pelatih Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.Prosiding Seminar Kebangsaan JPPG, Seremban.Zalika Adam, Faridah Kassim & Mohamad Johdi Salleh (2009). MemperkasakanPendidikan Luar Bandar. Prosiding Persidangan Kebangsaan Pendidikan Luar Bandar. UniversitiMalaysia Sabah. Kota Kinabalu Sabah, 3 5 Februari.Zalizan Mohd. Jelas & Hazadiah M. Dahan (2010). Gender and EducationalPerformance: The Malaysian Perspective. Procedia Social and Behavioral Science, 7,720-727.Zalizan Mohd. Jelas, Saemah Rahman, Roselan Baki & Jamil Ahmad (2005). PrestasiAkademik Mengikut Gender. Jurnal Pendidikan, 30, 93-111.

Reka bentuk dan pembangunan model pembuatan keputusan berasaskan faktor dalam pelaksanaan dasar 60:40 di sekolah menengah harian di Malaysia

Similar Items