Preliminary studies and pilot testing to implement blended learning approach in learning 3d drawing for students at Sekolah Seni Malaysia, Johor and English College, Johor
This preliminary study is a pilot test for the implementation of blended learning in teaching 3D drawing by blending face-to-face classroom with ICT-based settings using 3D Blender Tutorial Courseware, Youtube and Whatsapp interactive group chat apps. The objectives were to evaluate the effectivenes...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | thesis |
| Language: | eng |
| Published: |
2019
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6999 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| id |
oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:6999 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
uketd_dc |
| institution |
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| collection |
UPSI Digital Repository |
| language |
eng |
| topic |
|
| spellingShingle |
Azlan sukamat Preliminary studies and pilot testing to implement blended learning approach in learning 3d drawing for students at Sekolah Seni Malaysia, Johor and English College, Johor |
| description |
This preliminary study is a pilot test for the implementation of blended learning in teaching 3D drawing by blending face-to-face classroom with ICT-based settings using 3D Blender Tutorial Courseware, Youtube and Whatsapp interactive group chat apps. The objectives were to evaluate the effectiveness of blended learning approach on the students drawing skills, motivation, and learner autonomy, and also to determine the impact of students perspective of blended learning and teachers attitudes on their learning outcomes. The study was carried out using quantitative analytical approach by conducting a 3D Drawing Skill Evaluation and a survey before and after the implementation of blended learning. The respondents consisted of 40 students from Malaysian Art School and English College in Johor who were selected by using purposive sampling method based on the level of their computer literacy and interest in learning 3D drawing. The results of descriptive analysis revealed that there was a significant difference in the respondents level of 3D drawing knowledge (mean=1.868), drawing accuracy (mean=1.793, visualization skill (mean=1.855), completion time (mean=1.742), motivation (mean =1.95) and learner autonomy (mean = 1.87) after using the blended learning approach. It was also found from the regression analysis that the respondents attitude towards blended learning and perception of teachers attitude had a strong and significant effect on their motivation (R2=0.666, F(2,37)=36.81, p |
| format |
thesis |
| qualification_name |
|
| qualification_level |
Master's degree |
| author |
Azlan sukamat |
| author_facet |
Azlan sukamat |
| author_sort |
Azlan sukamat |
| title |
Preliminary studies and pilot testing to implement blended learning approach in learning 3d drawing for students at Sekolah Seni Malaysia, Johor and English College, Johor |
| title_short |
Preliminary studies and pilot testing to implement blended learning approach in learning 3d drawing for students at Sekolah Seni Malaysia, Johor and English College, Johor |
| title_full |
Preliminary studies and pilot testing to implement blended learning approach in learning 3d drawing for students at Sekolah Seni Malaysia, Johor and English College, Johor |
| title_fullStr |
Preliminary studies and pilot testing to implement blended learning approach in learning 3d drawing for students at Sekolah Seni Malaysia, Johor and English College, Johor |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Preliminary studies and pilot testing to implement blended learning approach in learning 3d drawing for students at Sekolah Seni Malaysia, Johor and English College, Johor |
| title_sort |
preliminary studies and pilot testing to implement blended learning approach in learning 3d drawing for students at sekolah seni malaysia, johor and english college, johor |
| granting_institution |
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| granting_department |
Fakulti Seni, Komputeran dan Industri Kreatif |
| publishDate |
2019 |
| url |
https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6999 |
| _version_ |
1747833345097596928 |
| spelling |
oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:69992022-04-20 Preliminary studies and pilot testing to implement blended learning approach in learning 3d drawing for students at Sekolah Seni Malaysia, Johor and English College, Johor 2019 Azlan sukamat This preliminary study is a pilot test for the implementation of blended learning in teaching 3D drawing by blending face-to-face classroom with ICT-based settings using 3D Blender Tutorial Courseware, Youtube and Whatsapp interactive group chat apps. The objectives were to evaluate the effectiveness of blended learning approach on the students drawing skills, motivation, and learner autonomy, and also to determine the impact of students perspective of blended learning and teachers attitudes on their learning outcomes. The study was carried out using quantitative analytical approach by conducting a 3D Drawing Skill Evaluation and a survey before and after the implementation of blended learning. The respondents consisted of 40 students from Malaysian Art School and English College in Johor who were selected by using purposive sampling method based on the level of their computer literacy and interest in learning 3D drawing. The results of descriptive analysis revealed that there was a significant difference in the respondents level of 3D drawing knowledge (mean=1.868), drawing accuracy (mean=1.793, visualization skill (mean=1.855), completion time (mean=1.742), motivation (mean =1.95) and learner autonomy (mean = 1.87) after using the blended learning approach. It was also found from the regression analysis that the respondents attitude towards blended learning and perception of teachers attitude had a strong and significant effect on their motivation (R2=0.666, F(2,37)=36.81, p 2019 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6999 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6999 text eng closedAccess Masters Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Seni, Komputeran dan Industri Kreatif Abdul Khalil, M.K. (2010). Modul Pembelajaran Kendiri Berbantukan Komputer bagi Lukisan Isometri. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.Abdul Wahab, N., Othman, J. & Warris, S.N. (2016). Blended Learning in Higher Education: An Overview. e-Academia Journal UiTMT, (5)1. Retrieved from http://journale-academiauitmt.edu.my/Abdulrasool, S., Mishra, R. & Khalaf, H. (2010). Teachers and Students' Attitudes Towards Traditional and Computer Assisted Blended Teaching and Learning Processes in Mechanical Engineering Subjects Area. Proceeding of 10th IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (pp. 1436-1441). United Kingdom: University of Huddersfield.Abubakar, D. & Adetimirin, A. (2015). Influence of computer literacy on postgraduates use of e-resources in Nigerian university library. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1207Ahmad Razali, N. (2003). Penghasilan Modul Pembelajaran Lukisan Kejuruteraan Berbantukan Komputer. Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia.Ahrens, A., Za?erinska, J. & Andreeva, N. (2015). Engineering Students Blended Learning in Higher Education. Proceeding of the International Scientifical Conference, Volume I.Akademi Sains Malaysia. Creative Industry Sector Final Report 2015. Retrieved from https://www.akademisains.gov.my/download/ms3.0/Creative_Industry_Secto r.pdfAkkoyunlu, B. & Soylu, M.Y. (2008). A study of students perceptions in a blended learning environment based on different learning styles. Educational Technology & Society, 11(1), 183-193.Akyz, H.?. & Samsa, S. (2009). The effects of blended learning environment on the critical thinking skills of students. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences,1(1), 1744-1748.Alias, N.A., Luaran, J.E. & Yahya, R.A. (2015). Blended & Flipped Learning: Case Studies in Malaysian HEIs. UKM Press.Anderson, T. (2004). Toward a Theory of Online Learning. In Theory of Practice and Online Learning, T. Anderson and F. Elloumi (eds.), Athabasca University Press, Canada, 2004, pp. 33-60.Arbaugh, J.B. & Duray, R. (2002). Technological and structural characteristics, student learning and satisfaction with web-based course: An exploratory study of two on-line MBA programs. Management Learning, 33(3), 331 347.Arbaugh, J.B. (2002). Managing the on-line classroom: A study of technological and behavioral characteristics of web-based MBA courses. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 3, 203223.Astleitner (2000). Teaching critical thinking online. Journal of Instructional Psychology, Vol. 29, No. 2. Retrieved from http://www.u.arizona.edu/~rgolden/teachingCriticalThinking.pdfBaartmans, B. & Sorby, S. (2003). Introduction to 3D spatial visualization: An active approach. USA: Thomson Delmar Learning.Baldwin-Evans, K. (2006). Key steps to implementing a successful blended learning strategy. Industrial and Commercial Training, 38(3), 156-163. doi:10.1108/00197850610659427Banks, J. (2001). From boring to "Blackboarding": Building participation through VLE group work. Retrieved from http://cebe.cf.ac.uk/learning/casestudies/case_pdf/jbanks.pdfBarshay, J. (2011). Blended Learning' for the Little Ones. (Cover story). Education Week, 31(9), 1-14.Bayram Gzer & Hamit Caner (2013). The past, present and future of blended learning: an in depth analysis of literature. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 116 (2014), pp. 4596 4603.Beadle, M. & Santy, J. (2008). The early benefits of a problem-based approach to teaching social inclusion using an online virtual town. Nurse Education in Practice, 8(3), 190-196. doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2007.07.004Beard, L.A., Harper, C. & Riley, G. (2004). Online versus on-campus instruction: Student attitudes & perceptions. TechTrends, 48(6), 29-31.Benson, P. & Voller, P. (1997). Autonomy and Independence in Language Learning. 1st ed. London: Routledge.Berge, Z.L. (2000). Evaluation web-based training programs. In B.H. Khan (Ed.), Web-based training (pp. 515522). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publication.Bertoline, G.R., Wiebe, E.N., Miller,C. & Mohler, J.L. (1997). Technical graphics communications (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.Blender (software). In Wikipedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blender_(software)Bliuc, A.M., Goodyear, P. & Ellis, R.A. (2007). Research focus and methodological choices in studies into students' experiences of blended learning in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(4), 231-244. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.08.001Bliuc, A.M., Goodyear, P. & Ellis, R.A. (2007). Research focus and methodological choices in studies into students' experiences of blended learning in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 10(4), 231-244.Bloom, B.S. (Ed.). 1956. Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals: Handbook I, cognitive domain. New York: Longman.Boyle, T., Bradley, C., Chalk, P., Jones, R. & Pickard, P. (2003). Using blended learning to improve student success rates in learning to program. Journal of Educational Media, 28(2-3), 165-178. doi:10.1080/1358165032000153160Brooks, L. (2008). An Analysis of Factors that affect faculty attitudes toward a blended learning environment. Ph.D dissertation, Faculty of the College of Education, TUI University, California.Bruce, B.C. (1997). Literacy technologies: What stance should we take? Journal of Literacy Research, 29(2), 289309.Bunyarit, M. (2006). E-learning Systems: An Evaluation of Its Effectiveness In Selected Higher Learning Institutions in Malaysia. M.S. thesis, International Islamic University Malaysia.Bushko, K. (2017). How Malaysian schools are tackling blended-learning challenges. Retrieved from https://www.christenseninstitute.org/blog/malaysian-schools- tackling-blended-learning-challenges/Chambers, M. (1999). The efficacy and ethics of using digital multimedia for educational purposes. In A. Tait & R. Mills (Eds.), The convergence of distance and conventional education: Patterns of flexibility for the individual learner (pp. 5-16). New York, NY: Routledge.Chandra, V. & Fisher, D.L. (2009). Students perceptions of a blended web-based learning environment. Learning Environment Research, 12, 31-44.Chen, C.C. & Jones, K.T. (2007). Blended learning vs. traditional classroom settings: Assessing effectiveness and student perceptions in an MBA accounting course. The Journal of Educators Online, 4(1), 1-15.Childs, S., Blenkinsopp, E., Hall, A. & Walton, G. (2005). Effective e-learning for health professionals and students barriers and their solutions. A systematic review of the literature findings from the HeXL project. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 22(Suppl. 2), 20-32. doi:10.1111/j.1470- 3327.2005.00614.xChiliban, B., C?uneac, D. & Chiliban, M. (2012). Facilitating Learning Using Modern E-Learning Tools in Technical Drawing and Infographics Teaching. The 6th Balkan Region Conference on Engineering and Business Education, Sibiu, Romania (Oct 18-21, 2012).Chuah K.M. & Hong, K.S. (2014) Chapter 7: Morpheus UNIMAS: Strengthening Student Engagement in Blended Learning Environments. Universiti Malaysia Sarawak. In Embi, M.A. (2014), Blended & Flipped Learning: Case Studies in Malaysian HEIs. Centre for Teaching & Learning Technologies, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia & Department of Higher Education, Ministry of Education Malaysia.Chuah, K.M. (2014). Luring the Lurkers: Increasing Participations in the Online Discussions of a Blended Learning Course. International Journal on E- Learning Practices 1 (1), 49-58.Cohen, K.E., Stage, F.K., Hammack, F.M. & Marcus, A. (2012). Persistence of masters students in the United States: Developing and testing of a conceptual model. USA: PhD Dissertation, New York University.Collis, B. (1995). Anticipating the impact of multimedia in education: Lessons from the literature. Computers in Adult Education and Training, 2(2), 136149.Daskalakis, S. & Tselios, N. (2011). Evaluating e-learning initiatives: A literature review on methods and research frameworks. International Journal of Web- Based Learning and Teaching Technologies (IJWLTT), 6(1), 35-51.Davis, M. (2012). Graphic design theory (Graphic design in context). London, UK: Thames & Hudson.Delia?ao?lu, . & Y?ld?r?m, Z. (2008). Design and development of a technology enhanced hybrid instruction based on MOLTA model: Its effectiveness in comparison to traditional instruction. Computers & Education, 51(1), 474- 483.Dewey, J. & Bentley, A.F. (1949). Knowing and the known. Boston: Beacon.Dillon, C.L. & Guawardena, C.N. (1995). A framework for the evaluation of telecommunications-based distance education. Paper presented at the 17th Congress of the International Council for Distance Education, Open University, Milton Keynes.Donnelly, R. (2010). Harmonizing technology with interaction in blended problem- based learning. Computers & Education. 54(2), 350-359. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.012Dziuban, C., Hartman, J., Juge, F., Moskal, P. & Sorg, S. (2006). Blended learning enters the mainstream. In C.J. Bonk & C.R. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 195-208). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.El-Deghaidy, H. & Nouby, A. (2008). Effectiveness of a blended e-learning cooperative approach in an Egyptian teacher education programme. Computers & Education, 51(3), 988-1006.Embi, M.A. (2014), Blended & Flipped Learning: Case Studies in Malaysian HEIs. Centre for Teaching & Learning Technologies, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia & Department of Higher Education, Ministry of Education Malaysia.Embi, M.A., Hamat, A. & Sulaiman, A.H. (2012). The use of learning management systems among Malaysian university lecturers. International Journal of Learning, 18(4), 61-70.Gagn, R.M., Wager, W.W., Golas, K.C. & Keller, J.M. (2005). Principles of Instructional Design. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/ Thomson Learning.Garnham, C. & Kaleta, R. (2002). Introduction to hybrid courses. Teaching with Technology Today, 8(6). Retrieved from http://www.uwsa.edu/ttt/articles/garnham.htmGarrison, D.R. & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Journal of Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95-105.Garrison, D.R. & Vaughan, N.D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Ginns, R. & Ellis, R. (2007). Quality in blended learning: Exploring the relationships between on-line and face-to-face teaching and learning. Journal of Internet and Higher Education, 10(1), 53-64. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.10.003Graham, C.R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definitions, current trends and future directions. In C.J. Bonk, & C.R. Graham (Eds.), The Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3-21). San Francisco: Pfeiffer.Graham, C.R., Woodfield, W. & Harrison, J.B. (2013). A framework for institutional adoption and implementation of blended learning in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 18, 414.Hair, J.F., William, C.B., Barry, J.B. & Rolph, E.A. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Halverson, L.R., Graham, C.R., Spring, K.J., Drysdale, J.S. & Henrie, C.R (2014). A thematic analysis of the most highly cited scholarship in the first decade of blended learning research. Internet and Higher Education, Vol.20, pp 20-34.Haron, H., Abbas, W.F. & Abd Rahman, N.A. (2012). The Adoption of Blended Learning among Malaysian Academicians. Proceeding of the 3rd International Conference on e-Learning ICEL 2011 (pp. 175-181). Bandung, Indonesia.Harris, P., Connolly, J. & Feeney, L. (2009). Blended learning: Overview and recommendations for successful implementation. Industrial and Commercial Training, 41(3), 155-163. doi:10.1108/00197850910950961Hira, D.S. (2009). Operations Research. S. Chand Company Limited, New Delhi.Hofmann, J. (2014). Solutions to the Top 10 Challenges of Blended Learning. Insync Training. Retrieved from https://www.insynctraining.com/pages/SolutionstotheTop10ChallengesofBle ndedLearning.pdfHolec, H. (1981). Autonomy and foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.Hollsopple, C. & Lee Post, A. (2006). Defining, Assessing, and Promoting E Learning Success: An Information Systems Perspective. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 4(1), 67-85.Hong, K.S., Lai, K.W. & Holton, D. (2003). Students satisfaction and perceived learning with web-based course. Educational Technology and Society, 6(1), 116124.Horn, M.B. & Staker, H. (2011). Classifying K12. Blended learning. Innosight Institute.Horn, M.B. & Staker, H. (2011). The rise of K-12 blended learning. Innosight Institute.Hughes, G. (2007). Using blended learning to increase learner support and improve retention. Teaching in Higher Education, 12(3), 349-363.Husin, I. (2000). Kursus Peningkatan Ilmu Dalam P&P, Lukisan Kejuruteraan SPM (Pembinaan Item) organized by Panitia SMT at SMT Kelang. April 2000.Islas, E., Prez, M., Rodriguez, G., Paredes, I., vila, I. & Mendoza, M. (2007). E- learning Tools Evaluation and Roadmap Development for an Electrical Utility. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 2(1), 63 75.Jia, J., Chen, Y., Ding, Z. & Ruan, M. (2012). Effects of a vocabulary acquisition and assessment system on students performance in a blended learning class for English subject. Computers & Education, 58(1), 63-76.Jiang, M. & Ting, E. (1998). Course design, instruction, and students online behaviors: A study of instructional variables and student perceptions of online learning. April. San Diego, CA: American Educational Research Association.Kamil Othman. MDECS perspective on creative multimedia the next booming industry. Presented at Penang Creative Industry Conference & Showcase (PCICS), 2014 Equatorial Hotel, Penang (May 6, 2014). Retrieved from http://investpenang.gov.my/portal/images/pdf/mdec-kamilothman.pdfKelley, D. & Gorham, J. (1988). Effects of immediacy on recall of information. Communication Education, 37, 198-208.Kenney, J. & Newcombe, E. (2011). Adopting a blended learning approach: Challenges encountered and lessons learned in an action research study. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 1(1), pp. 45-57.Khan, B. (2005). Managing e-learning strategies: Design, delivery, implementation and evaluation. Hershey, London, Melbourne, Singapore: Information Science PublishingKim, S.W. & Lee, M.G. (2007). Validation of an evaluation model for learning management systems. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(4), 284 294.Kintu, M.J. & Zhu, C. (2015). Computer competences among academic staff and students in relation to the use of blended learning: The case of Mountains of the Moon University in Western Uganda. Proceedings of the South Africa International Conference on Educational Technologies, Pretoria, South Africa, April, 19-21.Kintu, M.J. & Zhu, C. (2016). Student Characteristics and Learning Outcomes in a Blended Learning Environment Intervention in a Ugandan University. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, Volume 14 Issue 3 2016, (pp. 181- 195).Konradt, U. & Sulz, K. (2001). The experience of flow in interacting with a hypermedia learning environment. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 10(1), 6984.Kuo, Y., Belland, B.R., Schroder, K.E. & Walker, A.E. (2014). K-12 teachers perceptions of and their satisfaction with interaction type in blended learning environments. Distance Education, 35(3), 360-381. doi:10.1080/01587919.2015.955265Landa, R. (2006). Graphic design solution (3rd ed.). Clifton Park, NY: Thomson.Lebow, D. (1993). Constructivist values for instructional systems design: Five principles toward a new mindset. Educational Technology Research & Development, 41(3), 4-16. doi:10.1007/BF02297354Leidner, D. & Jarvenpaa, S. (1993). The Information Age Confronts Education: Case Studies on Electronic Classrooms. Information Systems Research, 4(1), pp. 2454.Lesch, S. (1995). Learning Outcomes: Learning Achieved by the End of a Course or Program Knowledge-Skills-Attitudes. George Brown College.Levy, Y. (2007). Comparing dropouts and persistence in e-learning courses. Computers Education, 48(2), 185204.Liaw, S.S., Huang, H.M. & Chen, G.D. (2007). Surveying instructor and learner attitudes toward e-learning. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1066-1080.Lim, D.H. & Morris, M.L. (2009). Learner and instructional factors influencing learning outcomes within a blended learning environment. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 282-293. Retrieved from http://www.ifets.info/journals/12_4/24.pdfLin, B. & Vassar, J. (2009). Determinants for success in online learning communities. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 5(3):340-350, January 2009.Little, D. (1991). Learner Autonomy 1: Definitions, Issues and Problems. Dublin: Authentik Language Learning Resources Ltd.Lpez-Prez, M., Prez-Lpez, M. C. & Rodrguez-Ariza, L. (2011). Blended learning in higher education: Students perceptions and their relation to outcomes. Computers & Education, 56(3), 818-826.Lou, S., Chen, N., Tsai, H., Tseng, K. & Shih, R. (2012). Using Blended Creative Teaching: Improving a Teacher Education Course on Designing Materials for Young Children. Australasian Journal Of Educational Technology, 28(5), 776-792.Loukis, E., Georgiou, S. & Pazalo, K. (2007). A Value Flow Model for the Evaluation of an E-Learning Service. Paper presented in ECIS 2007 Proceedings, Paper 175.Lynch, R. & Dembo, M. (2004). The Relationship Between Self-Regulation and Online Learning in a Blended Learning Context. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 5(2), Athabasca University Press.Maarop, A. H. & Embi, M. A. (2016). Implementation of Blended Learning in Higher Learning Institutions: A Review of Literature. International Education Studies, 9(3), 41-52.Malaysias creative content industry worth nearly US$5bil, says MDEC. In Digital News Asia (March 19, 2014). Retrieved from https://www.digitalnewsasia.com/node/6661Malaysias creative industry is making waves across the globe, says MDEC CEO Dato Yasmin. In Computer World (August 11, 2017). Retrieved from https://www.computerworld.com.sg/resource/careers-and-talent/malaysias- creative-industry-is-making-waves-across-the-globe-says-mdec-ceo-dato- yasmin/Marriott, N., Marriott, P. & Selwyn, N. (2004). Accounting undergraduates changing use of ICT and their views on using the internet in higher education. Journal Accounting Education, 13(1), 11730.Mason, R. & Rennie, F. (2006). E-learning: The Key Concepts. London: Routledge.Melton, B., Graf, J. & Chopak-Foss, J. (2009). Achievement and satisfaction in blended learning versus traditional general health course designs. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3(1).Mitchell, A. & Honore, S. (2007). Criteria for successful blended learning. Industrial and Commercial Training, 39(3), 143-149. doi:10.1108/00197850710742243Miyazoe, T. & Anderson, T. (2010). Learning outcomes and students perceptions of online writing: Simultaneous implementation of forum, blog, and wiki in an EFL blended learning setting. System, 38(2), 185-199.Moskal, P., Dziuban, C. & Hartman, J. (2013). Blended learning: A dangerous idea? The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 15-23.Nora Jaswa. Malaysia to expand digital, creative industries to drive growth. In Free Malaysia Today (June 20, 2017). Retrieved from https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2017/06/20/malaysia- to-expand-digital-creative-industries-to-drive-growth/Nunan, T., George, R. & McCausland, H. (2000). Rethinking the ways in which teaching and learning are supported: The Flexible Learning Centre at the University of South Australia. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 22(1), 85-98. doi:10.1080/713678130Official Website of Blender. Retrieved from https://www.blender.org/Oreck, B., Baum, S. & McCartney, H. (2000). Artistic talent development for urban youth: The promise and the challenge. Research Monograph for the National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented at the University of Connecticut, Storrs.Osgerby, J. (2013). Students' Perceptions of the Introduction of a Blended Learning Environment: An Exploratory Case Study. Journal Accounting Education, 22(1)Osguthorpe, R.E. & Graham, C.R. (2003). Blended learning environments. Definitions and directions. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4(3), 227-233.Othman, W. & Lee, M.F. (2004). Pembelajaran Lukisan Kejuruteraan Berteraskan Visualisasi: Keupayaan Pelajar Menyelesaikan Masalah. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.O'Toole, J.M. & Absalom, D.J. (2003). The impact of blended learning on student outcomes: Is there room on the horse for two? Journal of Educational Media, 28(2-3), 179-190. doi:10.1080/1358165032000165680Owston, R., Wideman, H., Murphy, J. & Lupshenyuk, D. (2008). Blended teacher professional development: A synthesis of three program evaluations. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3-4), 201-210. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.07.003Ozkan, S., Koseler, R. & Baykal (2009). Evaluating Learning Management Systems: Hexagonal E-Learning Assessment Model (HELAM). European and Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems 2008 (May 25-26 2008), Al Bustan Rotana Hotel, Dubai.Packham, G., Jones, P., Miller, C. & Thomas, B. (2004). E-learning and retention: Key factors influencing student withdrawal. Education and Training, 46(6/7), 335-342.Park, J.H. & Choi, H.J. (2009). Factors influencing adult learners decision to drop out or persist in online learning. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 207217.Passerini, K. & Granger, M.J. (2000). A developmental model for distance learning using the Internet. Computers Education, 34(1), 115.Piccoli, G., Ahmad, R. & Ives, B. (2001). Web-Based Virtual Learning Environments: A Research Framework and a Preliminary Assessment of Effectiveness in Basic IT Skills Training. MIS Quarterly, 25, 401-426.Pituch, K. & Lee, Y. (2006). The influence of the system characteristics on e-learning use. Computers and Education, 47(2), pp.222-244.Poon, J. (2013). Blended Learning: An Institutional Approach for Enhancing Students' Learning Experiences. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9 (2).Radford, A. (1997). The future of multimedia in education. First Monday, 2(11). Retrieved from http://www.firstmonday.org/article/view/560/481Rahman, S., Yasin, R.M., Jusoff, K., Yassin, S.F.M., Nordin, N.M. & Yusof, M.M. (2011). Knowledge construction process in online learning. Middle East Journal of Scientific ResearcH, 8(2), pp.488-492.Razali, Z.B. & Kamarudin, L.M. (2014). Experience on Blended Learning: Towards e-Laboratory. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273064355_Chapter_9_Buku_Blen ded_Learning_for_editingRosenblatt, L.M. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of literary work. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Ryan, W. & Conover, T. (2004). Graphic communication today (4th ed.). Clifton Park, NY: Thomson.Saud, M.S. & Lee, M. F. (2007). Hubungan antara kognitif visual dengan pencapaian Lukisan Kejuruteraan di kalangan pelajar sekolah menengah teknik. Paper presented at 1st International Malaysian Educational Technology Convention, Sofitel Palm Resort Senai, Johor Bahru. 25 December.Selim, H.M. (2007). Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance: Confirmatory factor models. International Journal of Technology Marketing, 2(2), 157 182.Sharpe, R., Benfield, G., Roberts, G. & Francis, R. (2006). The undergraduate experience of blended elearning: A review of UK literature and practice. York, UK: The Higher Education Academy.Shea, P. (2007). Towards a conceptual framework for learning in blended environments. In A. G. Picciano & C. D. Dziuban (Eds.), Blended learning: Research perspectives (pp. 1936). Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium.Shee, D.Y., & Wang, Y.S. (2008). Multi-criteria evaluation of the web-based e- learning system: A methodology based on learner satisfaction and its applications. Computers Education, 50(3), 894905.Shraim, K. & Khlaif, Z. (2010). An e-learning approach to secondary education in Palestine: opportunities and challenges. Information Technology for Development, 16(3), 159 173.Singh, H. (2003). Building effective blended learning programs. Educational Technology, 43(6), 51-54.Sloman, M. (2007). Making sense of blended learning. Industrial and Commercial Training, 39(6), 315- 318. doi:10.1108/00197850710816782Smyth, S., Houghton, C., Cooney, A. & Casey, D. (2012). Students' experiences of blended learning across a range of postgraduate programmes. Nurse Education Today, 32(4), 464-468. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2011.05.014So, H.J. & Brush, T.A. (2008). Students perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: Relationships and critical factors. Computers & Education, 51(1), 318-336.Spady (1994). Outcome-Based Education: Critical Issues and Answers. ERIC (ED380910), American Association of School Administrators, Arlington, VA.Stewart. J.M. (2002). A blended e-learning approach to intercultural training. Industrial and Commercial Training, 34(7), 269-271. doi:10.1108/00197850210447264Sun, P.C., Tsai, R.S., Finger, G., Chen, Y.Y. & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful eLearning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & Education, 50(4): 11831202.Tabor, S.W. (2007). Narrowing the distance: Implementing a hybrid learning model for information security education. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8(1), 47-57.Tahar, M.S. (2011). Keberkesanan Penggunaan CD Interaktif Lukisan Isometrik Terhadap Kemahiran Visualisasi Pelajar. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik dan Vokasional. 104-115.Tam, M. (2000). Constructivism, instructional design, and technology: Implications for transforming distance learning. Educational Technology & Society, 3(2), 50-60. Retrieved from http://www.ifets.info/journals/3_2/tam.htmlThompson, M.M. (2004). Evaluating online courses and programs. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. (2004) 15: 63.Thurmond, V.A., Wambach, K., & Connors, H.R. (2002). Evaluation of student satisfaction: Determining the impact of a web-based environment by controlling for student characteristics. American Journal of Distance Education, 16(3), 169189.Twigg, C.A. (2003a). Improving learning and reducing costs: Lessons learned from Round 1 of the Pew grant program in course redesign. Troy, NY: Center for Academic Transformation. Retrieved from http://www.thencat.org/PCR/R1Lessons.htmlTwigg, C.A. (2003b). Improving learning and reducing costs: New models for online learning. EDUCAUSE Review, 38(5), 28-38. Retrieved from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERM0352.pdfVaughan, N.D. (2007). Perspectives on blended learning in higher education. International Journal on E-Learning, 6(1), 81-94.Volery, T. & Lord, D. (2000). Critical success factors in online education. International Journal of Educational Management, 14(5), 216223.Wang, M., Shen, R., Novak, D. & Pan, X. (2009). The impact of mobile learning on students' learning behaviours and performance: Report from a large blended classroom. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(4), 673-695. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00846.xWebster, J., & Hackley, P. (1997). Teaching effectiveness in technology-mediated distance learning. Academy of Management Journal, 40(6), 1282-1309.Westermann, E.B. (2014). A Half-Flipped Classroom or an Alternative Approach?: Primary Sources and Blended Learning. Educational Research Quarterly, 38(2), 43-57.Wiley, S.E. (1990). An hierarchy of visual learning. Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 54(2), 3035.Woltering, V., Herrler, A., Spitzer, K. & Spreckelsen, C. (2009). Blended learning positively affects students' satisfaction and the role of the tutor in the problem-based learning process: Results of a mixed-method evaluation. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 14(5), 725-738. doi:10.1007/s10459-009-9154-6Yeh, Y.C., Huang, L.Y. & Yeh, Y.L. (2011). Knowledge management in blended learning: Effects on professional development in creativity instruction. Computers & Education, 56(1), 146-156.Yen, J.C. & Lee, C.Y. (2011). Exploring problem solving patterns and their impact on learning achievement in a blended learning environment. Computers & Education, 56(1), 138-145. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.08.012Zdravkovic, V. & Vian, B. (2000). Raising creativity and understanding of problems during learning computer visualization applications by using animation and visualization. Paper presented in Proceedings International Workshop on Advanced Learning Technologies. IWALT 2000. Advanced Learning Technology: Design and Development Issues (4-6 December 2000). doi: 10.1109/IWALT.2000.890641 |