Pembangunan dan persepsi pelajar terhadap Et-Game bagi konsep entalpi dalam tajum termokimia di peringkat matrikulasi

Pembangunan dan persepsi pelajar terhadap Et-Game bagi konsep entalpi dalam tajum termokimia di peringkat matrikulasi

Kajian ini bermatlamat untuk membangunkan satu permainan ET-Game bagi konsepentalpi dalam termokimia peringkat matrikulasi dan menentukan persepsi pelajarterhadap permainan tersebut. Reka bentuk kajian ini adalah reka bentuk danpembangunan berdasarkan model ADDIE. Teknik pensampelan rawak kelompokdi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Shua, Yee Shion
Format: thesis
Language:zsm
Published: 2021
Subjects:
QA Mathematics
Online Access:https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=7006
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:7006
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
collection UPSI Digital Repository
language zsm
topic QA Mathematics
spellingShingle QA Mathematics
Shua, Yee Shion
Pembangunan dan persepsi pelajar terhadap Et-Game bagi konsep entalpi dalam tajum termokimia di peringkat matrikulasi
description Kajian ini bermatlamat untuk membangunkan satu permainan ET-Game bagi konsepentalpi dalam termokimia peringkat matrikulasi dan menentukan persepsi pelajarterhadap permainan tersebut. Reka bentuk kajian ini adalah reka bentuk danpembangunan berdasarkan model ADDIE. Teknik pensampelan rawak kelompokdigunakan melibatkan 60 orang pelajar Program Matrikulasi Sistem Dua Semester disalah sebuah Kolej Matrikulasi Malaysia. Tiga instrumen yang telah disahkan olehpakar, iaitu borang penilaian kesahan kandungan ET-Game, borang soal selidikkebolehpercayaan ET-Game dan borang soal selidik persepsi pelajar digunakan dalamkajian ini. ET-Game yang dibangunkan memperolehi peratusan persetujuan kesahankandungan yang tinggi iaitu 91.49%. Data juga memaparkan ET-Game mempunyainilai kebolehpercayaan yang tinggi iaitu sebanyak 0.90. Nilai persepsi pelajarkumpulan sasaran terhadap ET-Game dari segi matlamat (M = 4.55, SP = 0.524), rekabentuk kad permainan (M = 4.72, SP = 0.502), komponen dan organisasi (M = 4.37,SP = 0.674), kebolehmainan (M = 4.61, SP = 0.522) dan kepenggunaan (M = 4.54, SP= 0.558) masing-masing memperolehi nilai skor min yang tinggi. Skor min yangtinggi menunjukkan tahap persetujuan yang tinggi terhadap aspek dalam soal selidikpersepsi. Kesimpulannya, kajian ini telah membangunkan satu permainan ET-Gameyang mempunyai kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan yang tinggi. Tambahan pula, pelajarjuga menunjukkan persepsi yang positif terhadap permainan berdasarkan lima aspekiaitu matlamat, reka bentuk kad permainan, komponen dan organisasi, kebolehmainanserta kepenggunaan. Implikasi kajian ini memaparkan ET-Game mengutamakanpembelajaran berpusatkan pelajar melalui permainan kad sesuai digunakan dalamproses pembelajaran dan pemudahcaraan pada abad ke-21 serta mendorongpembelajaran termokimia pada bila-bila masa dan di mana-mana sahaja.
format thesis
qualification_name
qualification_level Master's degree
author Shua, Yee Shion
author_facet Shua, Yee Shion
author_sort Shua, Yee Shion
title Pembangunan dan persepsi pelajar terhadap Et-Game bagi konsep entalpi dalam tajum termokimia di peringkat matrikulasi
title_short Pembangunan dan persepsi pelajar terhadap Et-Game bagi konsep entalpi dalam tajum termokimia di peringkat matrikulasi
title_full Pembangunan dan persepsi pelajar terhadap Et-Game bagi konsep entalpi dalam tajum termokimia di peringkat matrikulasi
title_fullStr Pembangunan dan persepsi pelajar terhadap Et-Game bagi konsep entalpi dalam tajum termokimia di peringkat matrikulasi
title_full_unstemmed Pembangunan dan persepsi pelajar terhadap Et-Game bagi konsep entalpi dalam tajum termokimia di peringkat matrikulasi
title_sort pembangunan dan persepsi pelajar terhadap et-game bagi konsep entalpi dalam tajum termokimia di peringkat matrikulasi
granting_institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
granting_department Fakulti Sains dan Matematik
publishDate 2021
url https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=7006
_version_ 1747833346478571520
spelling oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:70062022-04-21 Pembangunan dan persepsi pelajar terhadap Et-Game bagi konsep entalpi dalam tajum termokimia di peringkat matrikulasi 2021 Shua, Yee Shion QA Mathematics Kajian ini bermatlamat untuk membangunkan satu permainan ET-Game bagi konsepentalpi dalam termokimia peringkat matrikulasi dan menentukan persepsi pelajarterhadap permainan tersebut. Reka bentuk kajian ini adalah reka bentuk danpembangunan berdasarkan model ADDIE. Teknik pensampelan rawak kelompokdigunakan melibatkan 60 orang pelajar Program Matrikulasi Sistem Dua Semester disalah sebuah Kolej Matrikulasi Malaysia. Tiga instrumen yang telah disahkan olehpakar, iaitu borang penilaian kesahan kandungan ET-Game, borang soal selidikkebolehpercayaan ET-Game dan borang soal selidik persepsi pelajar digunakan dalamkajian ini. ET-Game yang dibangunkan memperolehi peratusan persetujuan kesahankandungan yang tinggi iaitu 91.49%. Data juga memaparkan ET-Game mempunyainilai kebolehpercayaan yang tinggi iaitu sebanyak 0.90. Nilai persepsi pelajarkumpulan sasaran terhadap ET-Game dari segi matlamat (M = 4.55, SP = 0.524), rekabentuk kad permainan (M = 4.72, SP = 0.502), komponen dan organisasi (M = 4.37,SP = 0.674), kebolehmainan (M = 4.61, SP = 0.522) dan kepenggunaan (M = 4.54, SP= 0.558) masing-masing memperolehi nilai skor min yang tinggi. Skor min yangtinggi menunjukkan tahap persetujuan yang tinggi terhadap aspek dalam soal selidikpersepsi. Kesimpulannya, kajian ini telah membangunkan satu permainan ET-Gameyang mempunyai kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan yang tinggi. Tambahan pula, pelajarjuga menunjukkan persepsi yang positif terhadap permainan berdasarkan lima aspekiaitu matlamat, reka bentuk kad permainan, komponen dan organisasi, kebolehmainanserta kepenggunaan. Implikasi kajian ini memaparkan ET-Game mengutamakanpembelajaran berpusatkan pelajar melalui permainan kad sesuai digunakan dalamproses pembelajaran dan pemudahcaraan pada abad ke-21 serta mendorongpembelajaran termokimia pada bila-bila masa dan di mana-mana sahaja. 2021 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=7006 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=7006 text zsm closedAccess Masters Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Sains dan Matematik Adam, N. E. (2015). Blooms taxonomy of cognitive learning objectives. Journal ofthe Medical Library, 103(3), 152-153.Aliza Ali, & Zamri Mahamod. (2016). Pembangunan dan kebolehgunaan modulberasaskan bermain bagi pembelajaran kemahiran bahasa Melayu kanak-kanakprasekolah. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu, 6(1), 16-29.Applied Educational Systems. (2019). What are 21st century skills? Diperoleh padaOktober 30, 2019, daripada https://www.aeseducation.com/careerreadiness/what-are-21st-century-skillsAmy Rose Aeriyamie A Rahman. (2016). Development of prozyme board game forteaching and learning enzyme topic in biology form 4. (Tesis sarjana yang tidakditerbitkan). Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Perak.Autunes, M., Pacheco, M. A. R., & Giovanela, M. (2012). Design and implementationof an educational game for teaching chemistry in higher education. Journal ofChemicl Education, 89(4), 517-521.Atkinson, S. & Mockford, C. (1993). Rekabentuk bahan keluaran. Kuala Lumpur:Penerbit Fajar Bakti.Ayyildiz, Y. & Tarhan, L. (2018). Problem-based learning in teaching chemistry:Enthalpy changes in systems. Research in Science and Technological Education,36(1), 3554. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1366898Azman Ab Rahman. (2018). Gamifikasi global zakat game dalam pendidikan Islam.Negeri Sembilan: Penerbit Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia.Banks, F. & Barlex, D. (2014). Teaching STEM in the secondary school: Helpingteachers meet the challenge. London: Routledge.Bayir, E. (2014). Developing and playing chemistry games to learn about elements,compounds and the periodic table: Elemental periodica, compoundica andgroupica. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(4), 531-535.Bicycle Playing Card. (2020). Crazy eights card game rules. Diperoleh pada Januari15, 2020, daripada https://bicyclecards.com/how-to-play/crazy-eights/Bidarra, J., Figueiredo, M., & Natlio, C. (2015). Interactive design and gamificationof eBooks for mobile and contextual learning. International Journal ofInteractive Mobile Technologies (IJIM), 9(3), 24-32.https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v9i3.4421Blake, R., & Sekuler, R. (2006). Perception. (Ed. ke-5). New York: McGraw-Hill.Boddy, N., Watson, K., & Aubusson, P. (2003). A trial of the five Es: A referentmodel for constructivist teaching and learning. Research in Science Education,33(1), 27-42.Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. New York:Springer.Breiner, J. M., Harkness, S. S., Johnson, C. C., & Koehler, C. M. (2012). What isSTEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships.School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 311. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00109.xBrown, J. L. (2000). What issues affect likert-scale questionnaire formats? JALTTesting & Evaluation SIG Newsletter, 4(1), 27-30.Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A. Gardner, A., Scotter, P. V., Powell, J. C., Westbrook, A.& Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins andeffectiveness. Diperoleh pada Mac 19, 2020, daripadahttps://media.bscs.org/bscsmw/5es/bscs_5e_full_report.pdfCarney, J. M. (2015). Retrosynthetic rummy: A synthestic organic chemistry cardgame. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(2), 328-331.Cartamundi. (2020). Gamerules happy families card game. Diperoleh pada Januari15, 2020, https://cartamundi.com/en/gamerules-happy-families-card-game/Chang, R., & Goldsby, K. A. (2005). Chemistry. (Ed. ke-11). New York: McGraw-Hill.Chonkaew, P., Sukhummek, B., & Faikhamta, C. (2019). STEM activities indetermining stoichiometry mole ratios for secondary-school chemistry teaching.Journal of Chemical Education, 96(6), 1182-1186.https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00985Chua Yan Piaw. (2006). Kaedah dan statistik penyelidikan: Kaedah penyelidikanbuku 1. Kuala Lumpur: McGraw-Hill.Chung, C. M., Mak, S. Y., Suen, Y. M., & Paul Sze. (1996). Game-display boardactivities for science teaching. Journal of Science Education and Technology,5(2), 141-154.Coll, R. K., & Taylor, T. G. N. (2001). Using constructivism to inform tertiarychemistry pedagogy. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe,2(3), 215-226.Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methodapproaches. (Ed. ke-3). California: Sage.Croasmun, J. T., & Ostrom, L. (2011). Using likert-type scales in the social sciences.Journal of Adult Education, 40(1), 19-22.Dam, R., & Siang, T. (2019). 5 stages in the design thinking process. Diperoleh padaOktober 8, 2019, daripada https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/5-stages-in-the-design-thinking-processDickson, M., Fidalgo, P., & Cairns, D. (2019). The S and T in STEM: Integratingscience and technology in education in the UAE. Dalam K. Gallagher (Pnyt.),Education in the United Arab Emirates (ms. 95-111). Singapore: Springer.Didit Ardianto, Harry Firman, Anna Permanasari, & Taufik Ramlan Ramalis. (2018).What is science, technology, engineering, mathematics (STEM) literacy?Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 253, 381-384.Atlantis Press. DOI: 10.2991/aes-18.2019.86Duran, L. B., & Duran, E. (2004). The 5E instructional model: A learning cycleapproach for inquiry-based science teaching. The Science Education, 3(2), 49-58.Eglinton, G., & Maxwell, J. R. (1971). Chemsyn-chemical card game 1. Education inChemistry, 8(4), 142-144.Ellington, H., Addinall, E., & Percival, F. (1981). Games and simulations in scienceeducation. Great Britain: Kogan Page.Eric, Z. F. L., & Chen, P. K. (2013). The effect of game-based learning on studentslearning performance in science learning A case of "conveyance go". Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103, 1044-1051.Erlina, Cane, V., & Williams, D. P. (2018). Prediction! The VSEPR Game: Usingcards and molecular model building to actively enhance students'understanding ofmolecular geometry. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(6), 991-995.Evi Suryawati, & Kamisah Osman (2018). Contextual learning: Innovative approachtowards the development of students scientific attitude and natural scienceperformance. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and TechnologyEducation, 14(1), 6176. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/79329Farmer, S. C., & Schuman, M. K. (2016). A simple card game to teach synthesis inorganic chemistry courses. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(4), 695698.DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00646Fatin Aliah Phang, Mohd Salleh Abu, Mohammad Bilal Ali, & Salmiza Salleh.(2014). Faktor penyumbang kepada kemerosotan penyertaan pelajar dalam aliransains: Satu analisis sorotan tesis. Sains Humanika, 2(4), 63-71.Fiscal, R. R. (2019). Modern approach to educational technologies. Canada: SocietyPublishing.Franco-Mariscal, A. J., Oliva-Martnez, J. M., & Bernal-Mrquez, S. (2012). Aneducational card game for learning families of chemical elements. Journal ofChemical Education, 89(8), 10441046.Franco-Mariscal, A. J. (2014). How can we teach the chemical elements to make thememorization task more enjoyable? Foundations of Science, 19(2), 185-188.https://DOI 10.1007/s10699-014-9355-1Franco-Mariscal, A. J., Oliva-Martnez, J. M., Blanco-Lpez, ., & Espaa-Ramos,E. (2016). A game-based approach to learning the idea of chemical elements andtheir periodic classification. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(7), 11731190.doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00846Gogal, K., Heuett, W., & Jaber, D. (2017). CHEMCompete: An organic chemistrycard game to differentiate between substitution and elimination reactions of alkylhalides. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(9), 12761279.Granath, P. L., & Russell, J. V. (1999). Using games to teach chemistry: The old profcard game. Journal of Chemical Education, 76(4), 485486.Grant, C., & Osanloo, A. (2014). Understanding, selecting, and integrating atheoeretical famework in dissertation research: Creating the blueprint for yourhouse. Administrative Issues Journal: Connecting Education, Practice, andResearch, 4(2), 12-26.Graziano, A. M., & Raulin, M. L. (2010). Research methods; A process of inquiry.(Ed. ke-7). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Greenbowe, T., & Meltzer, D. (2003). Student learning of thermochemical concept inthe context of solution calorimetry. International Journal of Science Education,25(7), 779-800.Gutierrez, A. F. (2014). Development and effectiveness of an educational card gameas supplementary material in understanding selected topics in biology. CBELife Sciences Education, 13(1), 7682. https://doi:10.1187/cbe.13-05-0093Hamizul Mahmud. (2019). Pembangunan dan keberkesanan permainan dalam taliankosa kata bahasa arab di SMKA. (Tesis kedoktoran yang tidak diterbitkan).Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi.Hanif Al Fatta, Zulisman Maksom, & Mohd Hafiz Zakaria. (2018). Game-basedlearning and gamification: Searching for definitions. International Journal ofSimulation Systems, Science & Technology, 19(6), 1-5. https://ijssst.info/Vol-19/No-6/paper41.pdfHanna Reedzuan, & Mohd Asrul Ishak. (2020). Revisi cepat PT3: Reka bentuk danteknologi. Selangor: Penerbit Ilmu Bakti.Hasso Plattner Institute of Design at Stanford. (t.t.). An introduction to design thinkingprocess guide. Diperoleh pada Oktober 7, 2019, daripada https://dschoolold.stanford.edu/sandbox/groups/designresources/wiki/36873/attachments/74b3d/ModeGuideBOOTCAMP2010L.pdfHeinich, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J. D., & Smaldino, S. E. (1996). Instructionalmedia dan technologies for learning. (Ed. ke-5). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Ideo. (2019). What is design thinking? Diperoleh pada Oktober 7, 2019, daripadahttps://www.ideou.com/blogs/inspiration/what-is-design-thinkingIsmail Sulaiman. (2018). Pembinaan dan pengujian kebolehgunaan modulpengajaran berasaskan peta pemikiran bagi topik nisbah, kadar dan kadaran.(Tesis sarjana yang tidak diterbitkan). Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Perak.Jackson, S. L. (2006). Research methods and statistics: A critical thining approach.(Ed. ke-2). California: Thomson Wadsworth.Johnson, E. B. (2002). Contextual teaching and learning: What it is and why its hereto stay. California: Corwin Press.Johnstone, A. H. (1991). Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom whatthey seem. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7(2), 75-83.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.1991.tb00230.xJohnstone, A. H. (1993). The development of chemistry teaching: A changingresponse to change demand. Symposium on Revolution and Evolution inChemical Education, 70(9), 701-705.Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., & Pal, D. K. (2015). Likert scale: Explored andexplained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7(4), 396-403.Julious, S. A. (2005). Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot study.Pharmaceutical Statistics, 4(4), 287291. doi:10.1002/pst.185Kamaleswaran Jayarajah, Rohaida Mohd Saat, & Rose Amnah Abdul Rauf. (2014). Areview of science, technology, engineering & mathematics (STEM) educationresearch from 1999-2013: A malaysian perspective. Eurasia Journal ofMathematics, Science & Technology ducation, 10(3), 155-163.Kapp, K. M., Blair, L., & Mesch, R. (2014). The gamification of learning andinstruction fieldbook: Ideas into practice. San Francisco: Wiley.Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2012). Spesifikasi kurikulum kimia tingkatan 4.Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum.Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013). Ringkasan eksekutif: Pelan PembangunanPendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025 (Pendidikan prasekolah hingga lepasmenengah). Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2017). Buku laporan inisiatif pengukuhanpendidikan STEM 2017. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2018). Pelan Pembangunan PendidikanMalaysia 2013-2025: Laporan tahunan 2018. Putrajaya: KementerianPendidikan Malaysia.Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2019). Bahagian Matrikulasi. Diperoleh padaDisember 20, 2019 daripada https://www.moe.gov.my/korporat/bahagian-danunit/bahagian-matrikulasiKementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2020). Soalan lazim program matrikulasi.Diperoleh pada April 15, 2020 daripadahttps://www.moe.gov.my/images/KPM/UKK/2020/02_Feb/SOALAN_LAZIM_SESI_2020_2021_20Feb2020.pdfKhairuddin Nisa, Che Zalina Zulkifli, Nor Azah Abdul Aziz, & Norhashim MohamadNordin. (2017). Reka bentuk gamifikasi pembelajaran geografi berasaskanpermainan Geoplay. Geografi, 5(1), 46-61.Khor Mooi Tieng, & Lim Hooi Lian. (2014). Pengetahuan teknologi pedagogikandungan (PTPK) dalam kalangan guru matematik sekolah rendah. JurnalPendidikan Sains & Matematik Malaysia, 4(1), 29-43.Kind, V. (2004). Beyond apperances: Studentsmisconceptions about basic chemicalideas. (Ed. ke-2). London: Royal Society of Chemistry.Kizilaslan, A., Sozbilir, M., & Zorluoglu, S. L. (2019). Making science accessible tostudents with visual impairments: Insulation-materials investigation. Journal ofChemical Education, 97(7), 1383-1388.Knudtson, C. A. (2015). ChemKarta: A card game for teaching functional groups inundergraduate organic chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(9), 15141517.Kordaki, M. (2015). A constructivist, modeling methodology for the design ofeducational card games. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191(2), 26-30.Kristol, D., & Perimutter, H. D. (1971a). Organocards-chemical card game 2.Education in Chemistry, 8(4), 145-147 & 150.Kristol, D., & Perimutter, H. D. (1971b). Organocards-chemical card game 3.Education in Chemistry, 8(4), 176-177.Kurniawan, R. A, Kurniasih, D., & Jukardi. (2017). Board and card games forstudying electrochemistry: Preliminary research and early design. DalamRiyanto, Krisna Merdekawati, Is Fatimah, Allwar & Noor Fitri (Pnyt.), AIPConference Proceedings, 1911(1), 02003-1-02003-6.https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5015996Lai Ngan Kuen. (2018). Evaluation of an enhanced game based learning throughVLE. (Tesis kedoktoran yang tidak diterbitkan). Universiti Malaya, KualaLumpur.Lay Ah Nam, & Kamisah Osman. (2018). Pendidikan kimia melalui mereka bentukpermainan: Teori dan amalan. Malaysia: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.Leela Devi Palany Kumar. (2015). Kesan penggunaan jigsaw puzzle dalam menulisformula kimia sebatian ion terhadap kefahaman pelajar sains tingkatan 4. (Tesissarjana yang tidak diterbitkan). Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Perak.Li, Y., Wang, K., Xiao, Y., & Froyd, J. E. (2020). Research and trends in STEMeducation: a systematic review of journal publications. International Journal ofSTEM Education, 7(11). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00207-6Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives ofPsychology, 22(140), 1-55.Lim Chong Hin. (2007). Penyelidikan pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif dankualitatif. Selangor: McGraw-Hill.Lizawati Mohamad Ham, Hamisah Abu Rashid, Ku Haslina Ku Abd Manaf, & MohdTaufiq Syakirin Ahmad Zawawi. (2017). Tahap motivasi intrinsik danpencapaian pelajar dalam pembelajaran kimia topik gas berasaskan permainanJejak rembo. Jurnal Penyelidikan Dedikasi, 13, 117-144.Lizawati Mohamad Ham, & Mohamad Syahrizal Ahmad. (2017). Penggunaanperisian animasi interaktif sel galvanik dalam pembelajaran elektrokimia: Kesanterhadap pemahaman konsep dalam topik elektrokimia. Journal of Science andMathematics Letters UPSI, 5, 36-51.Lu Chung Chin, & Effandi Zakaria. (2014). Development and validation of the gamebasedlearning module to enhance mathematics achievement, positive learningbehaviours and pro social behaviours. Journal of Science and MathematicsLetters UPSI, 2, 23-31.Lu Chung Chin, & Effandi Zakaria. (2015). Effect of game-based learning activitieson childrens positive learning and prosocial behaviours. Jurnal PendidikanMalaysia, 40(2), 159-165.Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. NursingResearch, 35(6), 382-385. https://doi:10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017Made Sukaryawan. (2019). Pembinaan dan kesan modul K5FN bagi topik kadartindak balas terhadap pelajar sekolah menengah di Palembang. (Tesiskedoktoran yang tidak diterbitkan). Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Perak.Mahardhika, S., Santoso, F., & Alfath, N. (2017). Paruman the khemion master:Learning Chemistry periodic table with trading card game. Journal of Game,Game Art and Gamification, 2(2), 53-56.Mahendra Narayan Singh, Shiv Shankar Sharma, Dhananjay Kumar Sinha, HimanshuVerma, & Shivendra Singh. (2019). SP597 Encouraging multicentric datacollection - a google form based permacath registry. Nephrology DialysisTransplantation, 34(1), 556-557. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfz103.SP597Marti-Centelles, V., & Rubio-Magnieto, J. (2014). ChemMend: A card game tointroduce and explore the periodic table while engaging students' interest.Journal of Chemical Education, 91(6), 868-871.Marziah Mohamad. (2019). Correct me: Dalam membantu pelajar mendefinisi danmenulis persamaan termokimia. Jurnal Penyelidikan Pendidikan, 20, 85-95.McMurry, J. E., & Fay, R. C. (2008). Chemistry. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.Mellor, K. E., Coish, P., Brooks, B. W., Gallagher, E. P., Mills, M., Kavanagh, T. J., Anastas, P. T. (2018). The safer chemical design game. Gamification of greenchemistry and safer chemical design concepts for high school and undergraduatestudents. Green Chemistry Letters and Reviews, 11(2), 103110.https://doi.org/10.1080/17518253.2018.1434566Mercy, O., Grace, K., & Michael, Y. S. (2019). Effectiveness of a constructivistinstructional approach on student academic achievement in chemical bonding inahoada east local government area of rivers state. International Journal ofEducation and Evaluation, 5(3), 42-55.Miller, A. (2014). Twelve ideas for teaching with QR codes. Diperoleh pada Ogos 12,2020 daripada https://www.edutopia.org/blog/QR-codes-teaching-andrew-millerMiller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits onour capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.Miller, J. L., Wentzel, M. T., Clark, J. H., & Hurst, G. A. (2019). Green machine: Acard game introducing students to systems thinking in green chemistry bystrategizing the creation of a recycling plant. Journal of Chemical Education,96(12), 3006-3013. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00278Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2019). Quick facts 2019: Malaysia educationalstatistics. Malaysia: Educational Data Sector.Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge:A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 10171054.Mohamad Najid Abdul Ghafar. (1999). Penyelidikan pendidikan. Johor Bahru:Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.Mohamad Siri Muslimin, Norazah Mohd Nordin, Ahmad Zamri Mansor & Melor MdYunus. (2017). The design and development of Mobieko: A mobile educationalapp for microeconomics module. Malaysian Journal of Learning andInstruction: Special Issues, 221-255. Diperoleh pada Januari 10, 2021, daripadahttp://e-journal.uum.edu.my/index.php/mjli/article/view/7804Mohd Awang Idris, Haslina Muhamad, & R Zirwatul Aida R Ibrahim. (2018).Metodologi penyelidikan sains sosial. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit UniversitiMalaya.Mootee, I. (2013). Design thinking for strategic innovation: What they cant teachyou at business or design school. United States of America: Wiley.Morris, T. A. (2011). Go chemistry: A card game to help students learn chemicalformulas. Journal of Chemical Education, 88(10), 13971399.Muafuatun, & Hardiningtyas, R. F. (2018). Development of website teachingmaterials based on systemic approach in thermochemistry. Journal of Physics:Conference Series, 1097(1), 1-9. doi :10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012063Nahadi, Firman, H., & Ulum, M. (2018). Development and validation of reasoningbasedmultiple choice test for measuring the mastery of chemistry. Journal ofEngineering Science and Technology, 13(6), 1476-1488.National Center for Education Statistics. (1999). Mathematics and scienceachievement of eighth-graders in 1999. Diperoleh pada Disember 20, 2019,daripada https://nces.ed.gov/timss/results99_1.aspNational Center for Education Statistics. (2000). Highlights from third internationalmathematics and study-repeat (TIMSS-R). Diperoleh pada Julai 28, 2020,daripada https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2001/2001027.pdfNational Center for Education Statistics. (2003). TIMSS 2003 tables. Diperoleh padaDisember 20, 2019, daripadahttps://nces.ed.gov/timss/TIMSS03Tables.asp?Quest=3&Figure=6National Center for Education Statistics. (2004). Highlights from the trends ininternational mathematics and science study (TIMSS) 2003. Diperoleh pada Julai28, 2020, daripada https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2005/2005005.pdfNational Center for Education Statistics. (2007). Table 3. Average science scores offourth- and eighth-grade students, by country: 2007. Diperoleh pada Disember20, 2019, daripada https://nces.ed.gov/timss/table07_3.aspNational Center for Education Statistics. (2009). Highlights from TIMSS 2007:Mathematics and science achievement of U.S. fourth- and eighth-grade studentsin an international context. Diperoleh pada Julai 28, 2020, daripadahttps://nces.ed.gov/pubs2009/2009001.pdfNational Center for Education Statistics. (2011). Table 5. Average science scores of8th-grade students, by education system: 2011. Diperoleh pada Disember 20,2019, daripada https://nces.ed.gov/timss/table11_5.aspNational Center for Education Statistics. (2012). Highlights from TIMSS 2011:Mathematics and science achievement of U.S. fourth- and eighth-grade studentsin an international context. Diperoleh pada Julai 28, 2020, daripadahttps://nces.ed.gov/pubs2013/2013009rev.pdfNational Center for Education Statistics. (2015). Science for grades 4 and 8:Averages. Diperoleh pada Disember 20, 2019, daripadahttps://nces.ed.gov/timss/timss2015/timss2015_table24.aspNational Center for Education Statistics. (2016). Highlights from TIMSS and TIMSSadvanced 2015. Diperoleh pada Julai 28, 2020, daripadahttps://nces.ed.gov/pubs2017/2017002.pdfNorazilawati Abdullah, Nik Azmah Nik Yusof, & Rosnidar Mansor. (2012).Pelaksanaan pendekatan konstruktivisme dalam mata pelajaran Sains. JurnalPendidikan Sains & Matematik Malaysia, 2(1), 78-91.Nor Azli Ismail. (2015). Penggunaan pembelajaran berasaskan permainan dalamkalangan murid LINUS bagi operasi asas. (Tesis sarjana yang tidak diterbitkan).Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi.Norhana Bakhary. (2019, Mei). Pembelajaran berpusatkan murid (SCL) cabaranmemenuhi tuntutan tenaga kerja abad ke-21. Pendidik. Diperoleh pada Julai 5,2020, https://www.pendidik.com.my/2019/05/08/pembelajaran-berpusatkanmurid-scl-cabaran-memenuhi-tuntutan-tenaga-kerja-abad-ke-21/OECD. (2012). PISA 2012 results in focus: What 15-year-olds know and what theycan do with what they know. Diperoleh pada Disember 20, 2019 daripadahttps://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results-overview.pdfOECD. (2018a). PISA 2018 results: Combined executive summaries Volume I, II &III. Diperoleh pada Disember 20, 2019 daripadahttps://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results-overview.pdfOECD. (2018b). Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) Resultsfrom PISA 2018. Diperoleh pada Disember 20, 2019 daripadahttps://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/PISA2018_CN_MYS.pdfOdenweller, C. M., Hsu, C. T., & DiCarlo, S. E. (1998). Educational card games forunderstanding gastrointestinal physiology. Advances in Physiology Education,275(6), S78-S84. doi:10.1152/advances.1998.275.6.s78Ong, E. T., Govindasay, A., Salleh, S. M., Tajuddin, N. M., Rahman, N. A., &Borhan, M. T. (2018). 5E inquiry learning model: Its effect on scienceachievement among Malaysian year 5 Indian students. International Journal ofAcademic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(12), 348-360.Ostler, E. (2012). 21st century STEM education: A tactical model for long-rangesuccess. International Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 2(1), 28-33.Paristiowati, M., Cahyana, U., & Fitriani, E. (2019). Hybrid of chemistry learningactivities in secondary school through development of the flipped classroommodel. Asia Proceedings of Social Sciences, 4(3), 11-13.Pieroni, O. I., Vuano, B. M., & Ciolino, A. E. (2000). Classroom innovation: Gamesto make chemistry more interesting and fun. Chemistry Educator, 5(4), 167-170.DOI: 10.1007/s00897000393aPiskurich, G. M. (2000). Rapid instructional design: Learning ID fast and right. CASan Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you knowwhats being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing &Health, 29(5), 489497.Precilla Rovat @ Robert. (2018). Development and effectiveness of stem-basedgamified experiments on students performance and motivation. (Tesis sarjanayang tidak diterbitkan). Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Perak.Priyambodo, E., & Wulaningrum, S. (2017). Using chemistry teaching aids basedlocal wisdom as an alternative media for chemistry teaching and learning.International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 6(4), 295-298.Punia Turiman, Jizah Omar, Adzliana Mohd Daud, & Kamisah Osman. (2012).Fostering the 21st century skills through scientific literacy and science processskills. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59(17), 110-116.Qian, M., & Clark, K. R. (2016). Game-based learning and 21st century skills: Areview of recent research. Computer in Human Behavior, 63, 50-58.Rastegarpour, H., & Marashi, P. (2012). The effect of card games and computergames on learning of chemistry concepts. Procedia Social and BehavioralSciences, 31, 597-601.Raymond Chang, Mohd. Shaari Azyze Mohd. Salleh Azyze, Gan Fie Chuen, SalwanaMd Ali, Norliza Ghazali & Suraida Ramli. (2005). Physical chemistry formatriculation. (Revised ed.). Kuala Lumpur: McGraw-Hill (Malaysia).Retno, A. T. P., Saputro, S., & Ulfa, M. (2018). Properness test: Development of aninquiry-based learning module to improve science literacy in thermochemistrysubject. Dalam Yoga Dwi Jatmiko, Rodliyati Azrianingsih, Mauludi AriestoPamungkas, Anna Safitri, & Corina Karim (Pnyt.), AIP ConferenceProceedings, 2021(1), 08003-1-08003-8. doi: 10.1063/1.5062822Rookes, P., & Willson, J. (2000). Perception: Theory, development and organisation.London and Philadelphia: Routledge.Russell, J. V. (1999). Using games to teach chemistry: An annotated bibliography.Journal of Chemical Education, 76(4), 481-484.Sadler, T. D., Romine, W. L., Menon, D., Ferdig, R. E., & Annetta, L. (2015).Learning biology through innovative curricula: A comparison of game- andnongame-based approaches. Science Education, 99(4), 696-720.Salbiah Mohamed Salleh @ Salleh, Jamil Ahmad, Mohd Aderi Che Noh & AdibahAbdul Latif. (2019). Teknik pelaporan indeks kesahan kandungan (CVI) dalamkajian sains sosial. Dalam Mohd Awang Idris, Mohd Sobhi Ishak Azanin Ahmad& Aszunarni Ayob (Pnyt.). Penyelidikan sains sosial: Aplikasi teori danmetodologi. (ms. 7-20). Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Malaya.Salen, K., & Zimmerman, E. (2004). Rules of play: Game design fundamentals.England: The MIT Press.Salinatul Saadiah Saat. (2016). Keberkesanan kad permainan untuk mengenalpastiradas makmal dalam kalangan murid tingkatan satu. (Tesis sarjana yang tidakditerbitkan). Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Perak.Samsiah Abdul Hamid. (2018). Writing research proposals in education. Terengganu:Universiti Malaysia Terengganu.Samuelson, A. G. (2018). Card game and chemistry teaching organometallic reactionsthrough card game. Resonance, 23, 915-923.Schiefele, U. (1991). Interest, learning and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26(3&4), 299-323. Diperoleh pada Jun 1, 2020, daripada https://publishup.unipotsdam.de/opus4ubp/frontdoor/deliver/index/docId/3170/file/schiefele1991_26.pdfSchmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S.(2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): Thedevelopment and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers.Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123-149.Schunk, D. H. (2008). Learning theories: An educational perspective. (Ed. ke-5).New Jersey: Pearson Education.Selvi, M., & Cosan, A. O. (2018). The effect of using educational games in teachingkingdoms of living things. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(9),2019-2028. DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2018.060921Sidek Mohd Noah, & Jamaludin Ahmad. (2005). Pembinaan modul: Bagaimanamembina modul latihan dan modul akademik. Selangor: Penerbit Universiti PutraMalaysia.Silberberg, M. S. (2006). Chemistry: The molecular nature of matter and change. (Ed.ke-4). United States: McGraw-Hill.Simpson, T. L. (2002). Dare I oppose constructivist theory? The Educational Forum,66, 347-354.Siti Rohaida Hashim. (2017). Pembangunan dan keberkesanan modul pengajarandan pembelajaran tajuk jatuh bebas dan gerakan luncuran dan keberkesanannyaterhadap pencapaian pelajar. (Tesis sarjana yang tidak diterbitkan). UniversitiPendidikan Sultan Idris, Perak.Sjostrom, J. (2014). Humanizing chemistry education: From simple contextualizationto multifaceted problematization. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(8), 1125-1131.Stojanovska, M., & Velevska, B. (2018). Chemistry games in the classroom: A pilotstudy. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education,1(2), 113-142.Sufean Hussin, & Norliza Zakuan. (2009). Dasar modal insan: 60:40 dalam sainsdan teknologi. Kuala Lumpur: Tinta Publishers.Sugiarti, A. C., Suyatno, S., & Sanjaya, I. G. M. (2018). The development of learningmaterial using learning cycle 5E model based stem to improve studentslearningoutcomes in thermochemistry. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1006(1),1-6. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1006/1/012039Suhaida Mohd Amin, Nurulhuda Mohd Satar, & Su Fei Yap. (2015). Trained inscience-base field: Change of specialization among educated women inMalaysia. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Science, 3(4), 38-45.Sumiati Suparmin. (2016). Pengujian kebolehgunaan kit pembelajaran visualisasiterhadap pemahaman konsep asas komunikasi tanpa wayar dalam kalanganpelajar novis. (Tesis sarjana yang tidak diterbitkan). Perak: UniversitiPendidikan Sultan Idris.Suniati, N. M. S., Sadia, W., & Suhandana, A. (2013). Pengaruh implementasipembelajaran kontekstual berbantuan multimedia interaktif tehadap penurunanmiskonsepsi. E-Journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas PendidikanGanesha, 4(1), 113.Syamsul Bahrin Zaibon. (2015). User testing on game usability, mobility, playability,and learning content of mobile game-based learning. Jurnal Teknologi Sciences& Engineering, 77(29), 131-139.Taber, K. S. (2000). Chemistry lessons for universities? A review of constructivistideas. University Chemistry Education, 4(2), 63-72.Tam, M. (2009). Chapter 3 Constructivism, instructional design, and technology:Implication for transforming distance learning. Dalam J. W. Willis (Pnyt.),Constructivist Instructional Design (C-ID): Foundations, models, and examples.(ms. 61-80). Charlotte, North Carolina: Information Age Publishing.Tantu, Y. R. P. (2018). Penerapan pembelajaran kontekstual untuk meningkatkankemampuan berfikir kritis siswa kelas 11 pada pelajaran kimia di UPH college. AJournal of Language, Literatur, Culture, and Education, 14(2), 209-222.Tan Wee Hoe. (2015). Gamifikasi dalam pendidikan. Tanjung Malim: UniversitiPendidikan Sultan Idris.Tan Wee Hoe, Lin Chia Ying, & Wang Yanzhen. (2013). Mandarin communicationlearning app: A proof-of-concept prototype of contextual learning. Journal ofResearch, Policy & Practice of Teachers & Teacher Education, 3(2), 38-48.Tan Yin Toon, & Ashy Kumren. (2013). Chemistry for matriculation semester 2. (Ed.ke-4). Selangor: Oxford Fajar Sdn Bhd.TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. (2020). TIMSS 2019 InternationalResults in Mathematics and Science. Diperoleh pada Disember 10, 2020,https://timss2019.org/reports/average-achievement-and-scale-score-distributionss8/Thiagarajan, S. (2003). Design your own games and activities: Thiagis templates forperformance improvement. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.Tsang, K. K. (2012). The use of midpoint on likert scale: The implication foreducational research. Hong Kong Teachers Centre Journal, 11, 121-130.Uchegbu, R. I., Oguoma, C. C., Elenwoke, U. E., & Ogbuagu, O. E. (2016).Perception of difficult topics in chemistry curriculum by senior secondary school(II) students in Imo State. AASCIT Journal of Education, 2(3), 18-23.Uslima, U., Ertikanto, C., & Rosidin, U. (2018). Contextual learning module based onmultiple representations: The influence on students concept understanding.Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 3(1), 1120.https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v3i1.2534Van Belle, G. (2008). Statistical tules of thumb. (Ed. ke-2). New York: John Wiley.Wan Hasmah Wan Mamat, & Nur Munirah Teoh Abdullah. (2015). Permainan dansimulasi. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.Wan Nor Fadzilah Wan Husin, Nurazidawati Mohamad Arsad, Oziah Othman, LiliaHalim, Mohamad Sattar Rasul, Kamisah Osman & Zanaton Iksan. (2016).Fostering students 21st century skills through project oriented problem basedlearning (POPBL) in integrated STEM education program. Asia-Pacific Forumon Science Learning and Teaching, 17(1), Diperoleh pada Disember 10, 2020,https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/7205/3a7800cfb74c47290b4da988d20bbb86a9eb.pdfWhitton, N. (2012). Good game design is good learning design. Dalam N. Whitton &A. Moseley (Pnyt.), Using games to enhance learning and teaching: Abeginners guide. (ms. 9-18). New York: Routledge.Whitton, N., & Moseley, A. (2012). Designing low-cost games for learning. Dalam N.Whitton & A. Moseley (Pnyt), Using games to enhance learning and teaching: Abeginners guide. (ms. 138-155). New York: Routledge.Widyastuti, E. & Susiana. (2019). Using the ADDIE model to develop learningmaterial for actuarial mathematics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series,1188(1), 1-9, doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1188/1/012052Wiji, W., & Mulyani, S. (2018). Students mental model, misconceptions,troublesome knowledge, and threshold concept on thermochemistry with DToMPOE.Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013(1), 1-5. https://doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012098Wong Weng Siong, & Kamisah Osman. (2018). Pembelajaran berasaskan permainandalam pendidikan STEM dan penguasaan kemahiran abad ke-21. Politeknik &Kolej Komuniti Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3, 121-135.Wood, J., & Donnelly-Hermosillo, D. F. (2019). Learning chemistry nomenclature:Comparing the use of an electronic game versus a study guide approach.Computers & Education, 14, 1-18.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103615Zhang Xuemei. (2017). Acid-base poker: A card game introducing the concepts ofacid and based at the college level. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(5), 606-609.Ziegler, G. R. (1974). Eloosis A card game which demonstrates the scientificmethod. Journal of Chemical Education, 51(8), 532.Zolkefli Bahador, Nordin Othman, & Mohd Kasri Saidon. (2017). Faktor-faktor yangmempengaruhi pengintegrasian teknologi pengajaran berdasarkan model tpackdalam kalangan guru matematik. Proceedings of the ICECRS, 1(2), 66-73.International Consortium of Education and Culture Research Studies.https://doi.org/10.21070/picecrs.v1i2.1438Zurida Ismail, Syariah Norhaidah Syed Idros, & Mohd. Ali Samsudin. (2007).Kaedah mengajar sains. Kuala Lumpur: PTS Professional.

Similar Items