The effect of PolySOM mobile application on students\' achievement in strength of materials subject at premier polytechnics in Malaysia
<p>The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of PolySOM mobile application on students achievement in the strength of materials subject at the premier polytechnics in Malaysia. The main research design used in this study was a quasi-experimental design. The PolySOM mobile a...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | thesis |
| Language: | eng |
| Published: |
2020
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=7136 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| id |
oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:7136 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
uketd_dc |
| institution |
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| collection |
UPSI Digital Repository |
| language |
eng |
| topic |
|
| spellingShingle |
Shangeetavaani Kannapiran The effect of PolySOM mobile application on students\' achievement in strength of materials subject at premier polytechnics in Malaysia |
| description |
<p>The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of PolySOM mobile application on students achievement in the strength of materials subject at the premier polytechnics in Malaysia. The main research design used in this study was a quasi-experimental design. The PolySOM mobile application was developed on Android platform using ADDIE model. The population of the study consisted of all third-semester mechanical engineering students at the premier polytechnics. A random sample of 43 students was assigned to an experimental group and 33 students were randomly assigned to a control group. In developing the PolySOM mobile application, the learning styles of the students were identified using VAK learning style model. The treatment was conducted for the experimental group using PolySOM mobile application for four-week period whereas the control group was given the conventional lectures on the strength of materials subject. The instruments used in the study were a set of tests and questionnaires. The instruments were validated by seven experts. The internal consistency reliabilities of the instruments using Alpha Cronbach were ranged between = 0.80 0.95. The empirical data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics such as frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, and t-test. The result showed that there was no significant difference between means of the pre-test between experimental and control groups. However, there were significant differences between the means of the post-tests of experimental and control groups based on the three cognitive levels. It was found that there were statistically significant differences in the cognitive level one [t (74) = -3.03; p<0.05), level two [t (74) = -4.56; p<0.05], and level three [t (74) =-2.65; p<0.05]. But for cognitive level four [t (74) = 0.51; p>0.05), the means for both groups were not significantly different. The questionnaire data showed that the respondents who used the PolySOM mobile application agreed that the application was useful. In conclusion, the main finding illustrated that PolySOM mobile application is effective in enhancing the students achievement in the strength of materials subject. The implication of the study is that PolySOM mobile application could be implemented in other higher learning institutions for mechanical engineering students.</p> |
| format |
thesis |
| qualification_name |
|
| qualification_level |
Doctorate |
| author |
Shangeetavaani Kannapiran |
| author_facet |
Shangeetavaani Kannapiran |
| author_sort |
Shangeetavaani Kannapiran |
| title |
The effect of PolySOM mobile application on students\' achievement in strength of materials subject at premier polytechnics in Malaysia |
| title_short |
The effect of PolySOM mobile application on students\' achievement in strength of materials subject at premier polytechnics in Malaysia |
| title_full |
The effect of PolySOM mobile application on students\' achievement in strength of materials subject at premier polytechnics in Malaysia |
| title_fullStr |
The effect of PolySOM mobile application on students\' achievement in strength of materials subject at premier polytechnics in Malaysia |
| title_full_unstemmed |
The effect of PolySOM mobile application on students\' achievement in strength of materials subject at premier polytechnics in Malaysia |
| title_sort |
effect of polysom mobile application on students\' achievement in strength of materials subject at premier polytechnics in malaysia |
| granting_institution |
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| granting_department |
Fakulti Teknikal dan Vokasional |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| url |
https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=7136 |
| _version_ |
1747833360049242112 |
| spelling |
oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:71362022-06-13 The effect of PolySOM mobile application on students\' achievement in strength of materials subject at premier polytechnics in Malaysia 2020 Shangeetavaani Kannapiran <p>The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of PolySOM mobile application on students achievement in the strength of materials subject at the premier polytechnics in Malaysia. The main research design used in this study was a quasi-experimental design. The PolySOM mobile application was developed on Android platform using ADDIE model. The population of the study consisted of all third-semester mechanical engineering students at the premier polytechnics. A random sample of 43 students was assigned to an experimental group and 33 students were randomly assigned to a control group. In developing the PolySOM mobile application, the learning styles of the students were identified using VAK learning style model. The treatment was conducted for the experimental group using PolySOM mobile application for four-week period whereas the control group was given the conventional lectures on the strength of materials subject. The instruments used in the study were a set of tests and questionnaires. The instruments were validated by seven experts. The internal consistency reliabilities of the instruments using Alpha Cronbach were ranged between = 0.80 0.95. The empirical data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics such as frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, and t-test. The result showed that there was no significant difference between means of the pre-test between experimental and control groups. However, there were significant differences between the means of the post-tests of experimental and control groups based on the three cognitive levels. It was found that there were statistically significant differences in the cognitive level one [t (74) = -3.03; p<0.05), level two [t (74) = -4.56; p<0.05], and level three [t (74) =-2.65; p<0.05]. But for cognitive level four [t (74) = 0.51; p>0.05), the means for both groups were not significantly different. The questionnaire data showed that the respondents who used the PolySOM mobile application agreed that the application was useful. In conclusion, the main finding illustrated that PolySOM mobile application is effective in enhancing the students achievement in the strength of materials subject. The implication of the study is that PolySOM mobile application could be implemented in other higher learning institutions for mechanical engineering students.</p> 2020 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=7136 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=7136 text eng closedAccess Doctoral Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Teknikal dan Vokasional <p>Abidin, M. J. Z., Rezaee, A. A., Abdullah, H. N., & Singh, K. K. B. (2011). Learning styles and overall academic achievement in a specific educational system. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1, (10), 143-152.</p><p></p><p>Abuhamdeh, M. (2010). A hierarchical framework to quantitatively evaluate success factors of mobile learning. Unpublished PHD Thesis, University of Banking and Financial Sciences, Amman, Jordan. Z. Ahmad, Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) in OIC Member Countries: Needs and Capacity Assessment. An Opening Speech at the Workshop on Technical and Vocational Education and Training or TVET in Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) Member Countries. (2016).</p><p></p><p>Ali, M., & Noordin, S. (2010). Hubungan antara kemahiran berfikir kritis dengan pencapaian akedemik dalam kalangan pelajar Fakulti Pendidikan Universiti Teknologi Malaysia [Relationship between critical thinking skills and academic achievement among student of Faculty Education at University Technology Malaysia]. Jurnal Teknologi (Sains Sosial), 52, 4555</p><p></p><p>Allen, E. & Seaman, J. (2007) Online Nation. Five Years of Growth in Online Learning. New York: The Sloan Consortium.</p><p></p><p>Allison, J.E. (2002). Technology, Development, and Democracy. Published by State University of New YorkPress, Albany.</p><p></p><p>Alreck, Pamela L., and Settle, Robert B. (1995). The Survey Research Handbook- Guideliness and Strategies for Conducting a Survey. USA: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.</p><p></p><p>Alspaugh, J.W. (1992). Socioeconomic measures and achievement: Urban vs rural. Rural Educator, 13:2 7.</p><p></p><p>Alzaza, N.S. (2012) .Opportunities for utilizing mobile learning services in the Palestinian Higher Education. Retrieved August 13, 2012 from http://www.iajet.org/iajet_files/vol.2/no.4/Opportunities%20for%20Utilizing%2 0Mobile%20Learning%20Services%20in%20the%20Palestinian%20Higher%20 Education.pdf</p><p></p><p>Amer, A. (2006). Reflections on Blooms revised taxonomy. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 4(1), 213-230.</p><p></p><p>Anderson, L.W. & Krathwohl, D.R. (Eds.) (2001). A taxonomy for Learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Blooms taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.</p><p></p><p>Anderson, L.W., Krathwohl, D.R., Airasian, P.W., Cruikshank, K.A., Mayer, R.E., Pintrich, P.R., Raths, J., Wittrock, M.C. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Pearson, Allyn & Bacon.</p><p></p><p>Author. (2014). Social media for social advances: Use of social media in educating future generations. In Ainin Sulaiman and M. Muzamil Naqshbandi, Social dynamism, issues and challenges. USA: Patridge Publishing.</p><p></p><p>Armstrong, A. M. (2004). Instructional Design in the Real World: A View from the Trenches. United States: Information Science Publishing.</p><p></p><p>Armstrong, D. A. (2011). Students perceptions of online learning and instructional tools: A qualitative study of undergraduate students use of online tools. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - TOJET, 10(3), 222-226.</p><p></p><p>Attewell, J. & Savill-Smith, C. (2005). Mobile Learning Anytime Everywhere, London: Learning and Skills Development Agency.</p><p></p><p>Ball, S. B., C. Eckel, & R. Christian (2006). Technology improves learning in large principles of economics classes: Using our WITS. The American Economic Review, 96 (2): 442-446.</p><p></p><p>Barbara B. Seels, and Rita C. Richey. (1994). Instructional Technology: The Definition and Domains of the Field, Washington, D.C.</p><p></p><p>Barbosa, E F (2013). A requirements catalog for mobile learning environments. Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing. 1822 March 2013, Coimbra, PortugalACM: 12661271.</p><p></p><p>Basir Ahmad, M. F, Abd Rashid, K. A, & Elias, M. S. (2010). Kesediaan dan kesedaran P&P berasaskan Cidos di Politeknik Seberang Perai [CIDOS based teaching and learning preparation and awareness at Polytechnic Seberang Perai]. Proceeding Seminar on the Transformational of Technical Education (MyTEDT). Sg Petani, Malaysia, 3 4 November2010, 166-171.</p><p></p><p>Benson, A. (2002). Using online learning to meet workforce demand: A case study of stakeholder inuence. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3(4), 443452.</p><p></p><p>Black, J & Hawkes, L. (2006 July 3-6). A Prototype Interface for Collaborative Mobile Learning. IWCMC06. Proceedings of the 2006 international conference on Wireless communications and mobile computing. Vancouver.</p><p></p><p>Blaikie, N. (2003). Analyzing Quantitative Data from description to explanation. Sage Publications Ltd. 214-247.</p><p></p><p>Blatchford, P., Bassett, P., & Brown, P. (2011). Examining the effect of class size on classroom engagement and teacher-pupil interaction: Differences in relation to pupil prior attainment and primary vs. secondary schools. Learning and Instruction, 715-730.</p><p></p><p>Bloom, B. S. (Ed.) (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I. Cognitive Domain. New York: Longman.</p><p></p><p>Bloom, B.S. (Ed.). Engelhart, M.D., Furst, E.J., Hill, W.H., Krathwohl, D.R. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay Co Inc.</p><p></p><p>Blustain, Harvey, Philip Goldstein, and Gregory Lozier. (1999). "Assessing the New Competitive Landscape," in Dancing with the Devil, Editors: Richard N. Katz and Associates, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco.</p><p></p><p>Bourdieu, R. & Passeron, P. (1978). Ttrasmissionc deil'eredita cuhurale, quoted in Benadusi. L. (2001). Equity and Education: A critical review of sociological research and thought. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.</p><p></p><p>Bowling, A. (2009). Research methods in health: Investigative Health and Health Services (3rd ed.). New York:McGraw-Hill. 162176.</p><p></p><p>Brodersen, C., Christensen, B.G., Grnbk, K. Dindler, C., & Sundararajah, B. (2005). eBag: A Ubiquitous Web Infrastructure for Nomadic Learning. Paper presented at the 14th International conference on World Wide Web, May 10-14, 2005, Chiba, Japan.</p><p></p><p>Brown, T. H. (2003). The role of m-learning in the future of e-learning in Africa. In 21st ICDE World Conference. Retrieved from http://matheasy.webstarts.com/uploads/The_role_of_mlearning_in_the_future_e- learning_in_Africa.pdf</p><p></p><p>Brown, J. S. & Adler, R. P. (2008). Minds on fire: Open education, the long tail, and learning 2.0. EDUCAUSEReview, 43(1), 1632.</p><p></p><p>Buck, J. L., McInnis, E., & Randolph, C. (2013). The new frontier of education: The impact of smartphone technology in the classroom. In American Society for Engineering Education.1 (1), 1-11.</p><p></p><p>Burcu Devrim Ictenbas and Hande Eryilmaz. (2011). Determining Learning Styles of Engineering Students to Improve the Design of a Service Course. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 342346, Science Direct.</p><p></p><p>C. A. Scolari, J. M. Aguado, and C. Feijoo, (2012). Mobile Media: Towards a Definition and Taxonomy of Contents and Applications. iJIM Vol. 6, Issue 2.</p><p></p><p>Carliner, S. (2004). An overview of online learning (2nd ed.). Armherst, MA: Human Resource Development Press.</p><p></p><p>C. Carlsson, J. Carlsson, K. Hyvonen, J. Puhakainen and P. (2006). Walden, Adoption of mobile devices/servicessearching for answers with the UTAUT, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Kauia, HI, p. 132a.</p><p></p><p>Carroll, J. B. (1963). A Model of School Learning. Teachers College Record, Vol. 64, 1963, pp. 723-733.</p><p></p><p>Caverly, C. D., Ward, R. A., & Cavarly, A. (2009). Techtalk: Mobile learning and access. Journal of Developmental Education, 33(1), 32-39.</p><p></p><p>Chang, Tong Shan. (2002). Reliability and Item Analysis. Retrieved from: http://www.tchang.net/stat/statistics.htm</p><p></p><p>Chapman, A. (2005-2012). VAK learning styles. Retrieved September 21, 2011, from www.businessballs.com</p><p></p><p>Chen, G., Mathieu, J. E., & Bliese, P. D. (2004). A framework for conducting multilevel construct validation. In F. J. Yammarino & F. Dansereau (Eds.), Research in multilevel issues: Multilevel issues in organizational behavior and processes (Vol. 3, pp. 273303). Oxford, England: Elsevier.</p><p></p><p>Chen, J. and Kinshuk, 2005. Mobile technology in educational services. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 14(1): 91-109.</p><p></p><p>Cheon, J., Sangno, L., Crooks, S.M. & Song, J. (2012). An investigation of mobile learning readiness in higher education based on the theory of planned behavior. Computers & Education, 59, 1054--1064.</p><p></p><p>Cheong, C., Bruno, V., & Cheong, F. (2012). Designing a mobile-app-based collaborative learning system. Journal of Information Technology Education, 11, 97-119.</p><p></p><p>Ching, D., Shuler, C., Lewis, A., Levine, M. H. (2009). Harnessing the potential of mobile technologies for children and learning. In A. Druin (Ed.) Mobile technology for children:Designing for interaction and learning (pp. 23-42). Burlington, MA: Elsevier.</p><p></p><p>C. M. Chiu and E. T. G. Wang. (2008). Understanding web-based learning continuance intention: The role of subjective task value, Information & Management, 45(3), pp. 194201.</p><p></p><p>Chou, C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2002). Developing Web-based curricula: Issues and challenges. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34, 623636.</p><p></p><p>Christensen, C. M., Horn, M. B., &Staker, H (2013). Is K-12 Blended Learning Disruptive? An introduction of the theory of hybrids. The Christensen Institute. Retrieved from http://www.christenseninstitute.org/publications/hybrids/.</p><p></p><p>Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2003). E-learning and the science of instruction. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.</p><p></p><p>Clark,A., Reznitskaya, A., Kuo,L., Miller,B.,Jadallah, M.,Anderson,R., Nguyen- Jahiel,K. (2009). Collaborative reasoning: A dialogic approach to group discussions. Cambridge Journal of Education 39 (1): 29-48.</p><p></p><p>Cochrane, T. (2010). Smartphones give you wings: Pedagogical affordance of mobile Web 2.0. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(1), 114.</p><p></p><p>Cohen, L.; Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2008). Research methods in education (6th ed.). London & New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. 133164.</p><p></p><p>Cook, T. D. and Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation. Design and analysis for field settings. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.</p><p></p><p>Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues in field settings. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.</p><p></p><p>Cole, H., & Stanton, D. (2003). Designing mobile technologies to support co-present collaboration. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 7(6), 365-371. doi:10.1007/s00779- 003-0249-4.</p><p></p><p>Collis, B. & Moonen, J. (2001). Flexible learning in digital world. London: Kogan Page. L. Columbus, 2013 Roundup of Samrtphone and Tablet forecasts and market estimates, Forbes, Jan. 2013. At url:http://www.forbes.com/sites/louiscolumbus/2013/01/17/2013-roundup-of- mobility-forecasts-and-market-estimates/</p><p></p><p>Connolly, T.M., Boyle, E.A., Stansfield, M.H., and Hainey, T. (2007) "The Potential of Online Games as a Collaborative Learning Environment", Journal of Advanced Technology for Learning (accepted).</p><p></p><p>Conrad, D. (2002). Deep in the hearts of learners: Insights into the nature of online community. Journal of Distance Education, 17(1), 119.</p><p></p><p>Conrad, D. (2006). E-Learning and social change: An apparent contradiction. In In. M. Beaudoin (Ed.), Perspectives on higher education in the digital age (pp. 2133). New York: Nova Science Publishers.</p><p></p><p>Corbell, J. R., & Valdes-Corbell, M. E. (2007). Are you ready for mobile learning? EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 30(2),51-58.</p><p></p><p>Crompton, H. (2013) A historical overview of mobile learning: Toward learner-centered education, in Z. L. Berge and L.Y. Muilenburg (eds.), Handbook of mobile learning (pp. 314). Florence, KY: Routledge.</p><p></p><p>Davis, F. (1985). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MA.</p><p></p><p>Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of in- formation technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.</p><p></p><p>Davis, S. (2012). Addicted to Your Smartphone? Here's What to Do. WebMD Feature. Retrieved from http://www.webmd.com/balance/guide/addicted-your- smartphone-what-to-do</p><p></p><p>Dawson, & Catherine. (2002). Practical Research Methods, New Delhi, UBS Publishers Distributors.</p><p></p><p>Debby A. Chessin and Virginia J. Moore. (2014). The 6-E Learning Model.</p><p></p><p>Department of Polytechnic and Community College Education [DPCCE]. (2009). Quick facts. Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Devinder, S. and A.B. Zaitun. (2006). Mobile learning in wireless classrooms. Malaysian Online Journal of Instructional Technology (MOJIT), 3(2): 26-42.</p><p></p><p>Digital Buzz. (2011). Infographic: Mobile gaming statistics 2011. Retrieved February 24, 2012, from http://www.digitalbuzzblog.com/infographic-mobile-gaming- statistics-stats-2011/</p><p></p><p>Dooley, K. (2003). Reconceptualising equity: Pedagogy for Chinese students in Australian schools, The Australian Educational Researchers, 30(3), 25-42.</p><p></p><p>Downes, S. (2005). E-learning 2.0. ACM eLearn Magazine. Retrieved March 15, 2010, from http://www.elearnmag.org/subpage.cfm? article=29-1&section=articles.</p><p></p><p>Drago, W. A., & Wagner, R. J. (2004). VARK preferred learning styles and online education. Management Research News, 27(7), 1-13.</p><p></p><p>Drucker, Peter. (1997). "An Interview with Peter Drucker," Forbes Magazine, March 10 pp.126-127.</p><p></p><p>J.J. Duderstadt. (2008). Engineering for a Changing World: A Roadmap to the Future of Engineering Practice, Research, and Education, Ann Arbor,Mich.:The Millennium Project, University of Michigan. http://milproj.dc.umich.edu/.</p><p></p><p>Dunn, R., & Dunn, K. (1986). The Dunn and Dunn learning style model of instruction. [Online] Available: http://www.unc.edu/depts/ncpts/publications/learnstyles.html</p><p></p><p>Economides, A. A. (2008). Requirements of mobile learning applications, International Journal of Innovation and Learning, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 457-479.</p><p></p><p>Eigen, L.D. & Komoski, P.K. (1989). Research Summary Number 1. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED001 386.</p><p></p><p>El-Hussein, M. O. M., & Cronje, J. C. (2010). Defining mobile learning in higher education landscape.Educational Technology & Society, 13(3), 12-21.</p><p></p><p>Embi, M. A. & Nordin, N. M. (Eds). (2013). Mobile learning: Malaysian initiatives and research findings. Malaysia: Centre for Academic Advancement, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Erden, M. & S. Altun. (2006). Learning Styles, Estanbul: Morpa Culture Publications. ISBN: 9752844863.</p><p></p><p>Fan, X. (2001). Parental Involvement and Students' Academic Achievement: A Growth Modeling Analysis. The Journal of Experimental Education, 70(1), pp. 27-61</p><p></p><p>Felder, R. M. & Brent, R. (2005). Understanding student differences. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 57-72. http://www4.ncsu.edu/unity/lockers/users/f/felder/public/Papers/Understanding_ Differences.pdf</p><p></p><p>Felder, R. M. & Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78(7), 674-681. [verified 26 Aug 2011] http://www4.ncsu.edu/unity/lockers/users/f/felder/public/Papers/LS-1988.pdf</p><p></p><p>Felder, R.M. & Spurlin, J. E. (2005). Application, reliability, and validity of the index of learning styles. Intl. J. Engr. Education, 21(1), 103-112.</p><p></p><p>Field A. Discovering statistics using SPSS. 3 ed. London: SAGE publications Ltd; 2009. p. 822.</p><p></p><p>Fisher, D. (2011). The Taxonomy Table. Retrieved May 24, 2016 from http://oregonstate.edu/instruct/coursedev/models/id/taxonomy/#table</p><p></p><p>Fisk, P. (2017). Education 4.0 the future of learning will be dramatically different, in school and throughout life. Retrieved from http://www.thegeniusworks.com/2017/01/future-education-young-everyone- taught-together</p><p></p><p>Fleming, N. D. (2006). V.A.R.K Visual, Aural/Auditory, Read/Write, Kinesthetic. New Zealand: Bonwell Green Mountain Falls.</p><p></p><p>Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafora, N., Jordta H., and Wenderotha M.P.; 2014, Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics, PNAS, Vol. 111, no. 23, pp. 84108415</p><p></p><p>Freysen, J. B. (2005). M-learning: an educational perspective. Mobile learning anytime everywhere, 73.</p><p></p><p>Gardy, G.D. (2002). Assessing The Reliability of Scales. [Online]. Retrieved on 30 August, 2004. http://www.irss.unc.edu/irss/shortcourses/gaddyhandouts/ReliabilityHandouts/ Reliabilityhandout.pdf</p><p></p><p>Gartner (2015). Gartner says worldwide traditional pc, tablet, ultramobile and mobile phone shipments to grow 4.2 percent in 2014. http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/2791017</p><p></p><p>Giancarlo, L. C. and Slunt, K. M. (2004). The dog ate my homework: A cooperative learning project for instrumental analysis, Journal of Chemical Education, 81(6), pp. 868869.</p><p></p><p>Gonzalez-Pienda, J.A, Nunez, J.C., Gonzalez-Pumariega, S., Alvarez, L., Roces, C. & Garcia, M. (2002). A Structural Equation Model of Parental Involvement, Motivational and Aptitudinal Characteristics, and Academic Achievement. The Journal of Experimental Education, 70(3), pp. 257-287</p><p></p><p>Govindasamy, T. (2002). Successful implementation of e-learning: Pedagogical considerations. The internet and higher education, 4(3), 287-299.</p><p></p><p>Grant, P., & Basye, D. (2014). Personalized learning: A guide for engaging students with technology. Eugene: International Society for Technology in Education.</p><p></p><p>Gredler, M. E. (1997). Learning and instruction: Theory into practice (3rd ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.</p><p></p><p>Glay Ekren & Nilgn zdamar Keskin, (2017). Using The Revised Bloom Taxonomy In Designing Learning With Mobile Apps. e-Journal of UDEEEWANA, Vol. 3, Number: 1, Article 1 GLOKALde.</p><p></p><p>Guilar, J., & Loring, A. (2008). Dialogue and community in online learning: Lessons from Royal Roads University. Journal of Distance Education, 22(3), 1940.</p><p></p><p>Guralnich, D. (2008). The Importance of the Learner's Environmental Context in the Design of M-Learning Product. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 2 (1), 36-39.</p><p></p><p>Guri-Rosenblit, S. (2005). Eight paradoxes in the implementation process of e-learning in higher education. Higher Education Policy, 18(1), 5-5-29. doi: 0.1057/palgrave.hep.8300069.</p><p></p><p>Habboush, A., Nassuora, A., & Hussein, A.-R. (2011). Acceptance of mobile learning by university students. American Journal of Scientific Research (22), 119-122.</p><p></p><p>Hall, B. (1997). Web-based training cookbook. New York: Wiley.</p><p></p><p>Haller, E. J., Monk, D. H., & Tien, L. T. (1993). Small schools and higher-order thinking skills. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 9, 66-73.</p><p></p><p>Hamm, S. E., Drysdale, J., & Moore, D. (2014). Towards a mobile learning pedagogy. Mobile pedagogy and perspectives on teaching and learning, 1-20.</p><p></p><p>Hatch, M. and H. Farhady. (1982). Reading Design and Statistics for Applied Linguistics. Rowley, Mass. U.S.A.: Newbury House.</p><p></p><p>Heinrich R, Molenda M, Russell JD. (1989). Instructional media and the new technologies of instruction. New York: MacMillan Publishing.</p><p></p><p>Heng, L E, Sangodiah, A and Ahmad, W F W (2012). End users perspective of usability in mobile learning system. Proceedings of International Conference on Computer & Information Science 2012. 1214 June 2012, Kuala Lumpur, MalaysiaIEEE: 10951098.</p><p></p><p>Hergenhahn, B. R., & Olson, M. (2005). An introduction to theories of learning (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.</p><p></p><p>Hijazi, Syed Tahir and Naqvi, S.M.M. Raza. (2006). Factors Affecting Students Performance: A Case of Private Colleges. Bangladesh e-Journal of Sociology: Volume 3, Number 1.</p><p></p><p>Hilgard, E.R., and Bower, G.H. (1966). Theories of Learning. New York. Appleton- Century-Crofts.</p><p></p><p>Hill, J. R. (2002). Overcoming obstacles and creating connections: Community building in web-based learning environments. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 14(1), 67-86.</p><p></p><p>Hiltz, S. R., & Turoff, M. (2005). Education goes digital: the evolution of online learning and the revolution in higher education. Communications of the ACM, 48(10), 59-64.</p><p></p><p>Hirsh, J. (2005). Applying students' own devices in the classroom. School Administrator, 62(10).</p><p></p><p>Holley, D., 2002. Which room is the virtual seminar in please?. Education and Training, 44(3), pp.112-121.</p><p></p><p>Honey, P. and Mumford, A. (1992). The manual of learning styles. Maidenhead: P. Honey.</p><p></p><p>Hosam F. El-Sofany, Samir A. El-Seoud, Hassan M. Alwadani, and Amer E. Alwadani (2014). Development of Mobile Educational Services Application to Improve Educational Outcomes using Android Technology. iJIM - Vol. 8, Issue 2.</p><p></p><p>Howley, C. B. (2000). School District Size and School Performance. Charleston: Rural Education Issue Digest.</p><p></p><p>Hung, P. H., Hwang, G. J., Lin, Y. F., Wu, T. H., & Su, I. H. (2013). Seamless connection between learning and assessment-applying progressive learning tasks in mobile ecology inquiry. Educational Technology and Society, 16(1), 194-205. Retrieved from http://www.ifets.info/journals/16_1/17.pdf.</p><p></p><p>Huang, K-Y (2009). Challenges in human-computer interaction design for mobile devices. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science 2009. 2022 October 2009, Hong Kong International Association of Engineers: 2022. San Francisco, USA.</p><p></p><p>Hwang, G., & Tsai, C. (2011). Research trends in mobile and ubiquitous learning: A review of publications in selected journals from 2001 to 2010. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(4), E65E70.</p><p></p><p>Illeris, K. (2007). How we learn. Learning and non-learning in school and beyond. London: Routledge.</p><p></p><p>Isham, S., H, M.A. I and Ramlee. M. (2011). Teknologi Mobil dalam Pembelajaran Modul Senireka di Politeknik Port Dickson. In: Persidangan Kebangsaan Penyelidikan dan Inovasi dalam Pendidikan dan Latihan Teknik danVokasional (CIE-TVT2011). Penang: pp: 506 511.</p><p></p><p>Jacobsen, BS, & Forste R (2011). The Wired Generation: Academic and Social Outcomes of Electronic Media Use Among University Students.</p><p></p><p>Jamil, M., & Shah, J. H. (2011). Technology: its potential effects on teaching in higher education. New Horizons in Education, 59(1), 38-51.</p><p></p><p>Jegatha Deborah, L. Baskaran, R., Kannan, A. and Vijayakumar, P., Intelligent Agent Based Pair Programming and Increased Self-Efficacy through Prior-Learning for Enhanced Learning Performance. pp. 87100, Malaysian Journal of Computer Science, Vol. 26(2), 2013.</p><p></p><p>Jones, G., Hanton, S., &Connaughton, D. (2002). What is this thing called mental toughness? An investigation of Elite Sport Performers. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 14, 205-218.</p><p></p><p>Joppe, M. (2000). The Research Process.</p><p></p><p>Kaneko, K., Okada, Y., Yoshida, M., Inoue, H., Fujimurav, N., 2015. Educational materials for mobile learning, in: 11th World Conference on Mobile Learning. Presented at the IADIS, Madeira, Portugal, pp. 109112.</p><p></p><p>Kavurmac, U., (2003). Mobil almayaHazrmsnz?. IT Business Weekly, April, p. 6-12.</p><p></p><p>Keefe, J. W. (1987). Learning styles: Theory and practice. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.</p><p></p><p>Kennedy, G., Dalgarno, B., Bennett, S., Terry Judd, K. G., & Chang, R. (2008a).Immigrants and natives: Investigating differences between staff and students' use of technology. Paper presented at the 25th annual conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (ASCILITE) Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.</p><p></p><p>Kennedy, G. E., Judd, T. S., Churchward, A., & Gray, K. (2008b). First year students' experiences with technology: Are they really digital natives? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(1), 108-122.</p><p></p><p>Khan, R.M.; Khan, M. A &Zubairi, N. (1999). Parental Involvement and reading Attainment: A Study of 4th Grade Pakistani Children, Journal Pendidikan, 20, pp. 83-94, Fakulti Pedidikan University, Malaya,</p><p></p><p>King, F.B., Young, M.F., Drivere-Richmond, K. & Schrader, P.G. (2001). Defining Distance Learning and Distance Education. AACE Journal, 9(1), 1-14. Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).</p><p></p><p>Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as a source of learning and development, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.</p><p></p><p>Korkala, M. &Abrahamsson, P (2007). Communication in Distributed Agile Development: A Case Study.</p><p></p><p>Kuo, F-R., Hwang, G-J., Chen, Y-J. & Wang, S-L. (2007). Standards and Tools for Context-Aware Ubiquitous Learning. Proceedings of Seventh IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2007).</p><p></p><p>Krathwohl, D. R., & Anderson, L. W. (2010). Merlin C. Wittrock and the revision of Bloom's Taxonomy. Educational psychologist, 45(1), 64-65.</p><p></p><p>Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory into practice, 41(4), 212-218.</p><p></p><p>Kratzig, G. P. & Arbuthnott, K.D. (2006). Perceptual learning style and learning proficiency: A test of the hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 238-246.</p><p></p><p>Krishnan, M., & Muhammad Yassin, R. (2009). Problem based learning in engineering education at Malaysian polytechnics: A Proposal. 2009 International Conference on Engineering Education. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, December 7-8, 2009. Retrieved from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=05490599</p><p></p><p>Lan, Y.-F., & Huang, S.-M. (2012). Using mobile learning to improve the reflection: a case study of traffic violation. Educational Technology & Society, 15(2), 179193. Retrieved from http://www.ifets.info/journals/15_2/16.pdf</p><p></p><p>Laouris, Y., & Eteokleous, N. (2005). We need an educational relevant definition of mobile learning. Retrieved from http://www.mlearn.org.za/CD/papers/Laouris%20&%20Eteokleous.pdf.</p><p></p><p>Larry Johnson, Samantha Adams Becker, M. Cummins, V. Estrada, A. Freeman, and Holly Ludgate, NMC Horizon Report: 2013 Higher Education Edition, New Media Consortium, 2013.</p><p></p><p>Lehner, F. & Nsekabel, H. (2002). The Role of Mobile Devices In E-Learning - First Experiences With A Wireless E-Learning Environment. WMTE 2002: 103-106.</p><p></p><p>Lincoln, YS. &Guba, EG.(1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park: SAGE.</p><p></p><p>Ling, Y., L. (2010). Persepsi pelajar terhadap aspek pengajaran pensyarah yang mempengaruhi pencapaian akademik [Student perception on lecturersteaching] Proceeding Seminar on the Transformational of Technical Education (MyTEDT). Sg Petani, Malaysia, 3-4 November 2010, 171-181.</p><p></p><p>Litchfield, A., Dyson, L. E., Lawrence, E., &Zmijewska, A. (2007). Directions for m- learning research to enhance active learning. Proceedings ascilite Singapore 2007.</p><p></p><p>Little, B. (2013). Issues in mobile learning technology. Human Resource Management International Digest, 21 (3), 26-29.</p><p></p><p>Lupton E. (2014). Type on Screen: A Critical Guide for Designers, Writers, Developers and Students. Princeton Architectural Press.</p><p></p><p>M. El-Hussein, M. O., & Cronje, J. C. (2010). Defining mobile learning in the higher education landscape. [Article]. Journal of educational Technology & Society, 13(3), 12-21.</p><p></p><p>Mahamad, S., Ibrahim, M.N., &Taib, S.M. (2010).M-learning: A new paradigm of learning mathematics in Malaysia. International Journal of Computer Science & Information Technology, 2(4), 76-86.</p><p></p><p>Mahyuddin, R., Lope Pihie, Z. A., Elias, H., & Konting, M. M. (2004). The incorporation of thinking skills in the school curriculum. Kajian Malaysia, 22(2), 23-33. Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) Report (2009). Hand phone users survey 2009. Retrieved from http://www.skmm.gov.my/skmmgovmy/files/attachments/HPUS-2009.pdf</p><p></p><p>Malaysia Education Ministry. (2008). Pengurusan masa dan gaya pembelajaran. http://myschoolnet.ppk.kpm/my.bhn.pnp/modul / bcb9</p><p></p><p>Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC), Facts & Figures - Statistics & Records, 2010, available at http://www.mcmc.gov.my</p><p></p><p>Mann, Christine. (1994). New technologies and gifted education. Roeper Review, 16, 172-176.</p><p></p><p>Martin, D. (1994) Online GIS collaboration. Presented at the WUN eLearning Workshop, Chicago (http://www.wun.ac.uk/ggisa/documents/pdfs/martin.pdf) .</p><p></p><p>Martin, G. & Mats, H. (2005). Mechatronics the evolution of an academic discipline in engineering education, Mechatronics, 15(2), pp. 179-192.</p><p></p><p>Marwan, M. E., Madar, A. R., &Fuad, N. (2013). An Overview of mobile application in learning for student of Kolej Poly-Tech Mara (KPTM) by using mobile phone. Journal of Asian Scientific Research, 3(6), 527-537.</p><p></p><p>McAlister, A. (2009). Teaching the millennial generation. American Music Teacher, Proquest Education Journal, 13-15.</p><p></p><p>McInnis, C., & Hartley, R. (2002). Managing Study and Work: The impact of full-time study and paid work on the undergraduate experience in Australian universities [Electronic Version]. Department of Education, Science and Training, Commonwealth of Australia. Retrieved from http://www.dest.gov.au/highered/eippubs/eip02_6/eip02_6.pdf.</p><p></p><p>McQuiggan, C. A. (2007). The role of faculty development in online teachings potential to question teaching beliefs and assumptions. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 10(3).</p><p></p><p>McQuiggan, S., McQuiggan, J., Kosturko, L. & Sabourin, J. (2015). Mobile learning: A handbook for developers, editors and learners. North Caroline: SAS Institute Inc.</p><p></p><p>Melor Md Yunus, Maimun Aqsha Lubis, & Chua, P.L. (2009). Language learning via ICT: uses, challenges and issues. WSEAS Transactions on Information Science and Application 6(9): 1453-1467.</p><p></p><p>Meier, R. (2008). Professional Android Application Development. Wiley, Indianapolis.</p><p></p><p>Miangah, T. M., & Nezarat, A. (2012). Mobile-assisted language learning. InternationalJournal of Distributed and Parallel Systems, 3(1), 309. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijdps.2012.3126J. S. Milton and J. C. Arnold, Introduction to Probability and Statistics: Principles and Applications for Engineering and the Computing Sciences, McGraw Hill, 2002. Ministry of Higher Education. (2009). Malaysian Education: Malaysia Centre of Educational Excellence.</p><p></p><p>Ministry of Education Malaysia (MOE). (2013c). Pentaksiran Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi. Putrajaya, Malaysia: Published by: MOE.</p><p></p><p>Ministry of Education Malaysia (MOE). (2017). Panduan Pelaksanaan Pendidikan Abad Ke-21. Negeri Sembilan: Penerbitan Institut Aminuddin Baki.</p><p></p><p>Motiwalla, L. (2007). Mobile learning: A Framework and Evaluation. Journal of Computer and Education, 49, 581-596.</p><p></p><p>NST-Business Times (2013). Smartphone penetration seen hitting 60% in 2 years.Online news from http://www.btimes.com.my/Current_News/BTIMES/articles/jrmilan/Article/.</p><p></p><p>Neil Shah. (2016). NLP Your Map to Happiness, Confidence and Success. Icon Books Ltd, UK.</p><p></p><p>Newby, T., Stepich, D., Lehman, J., & Russell, J. (2000). Instructional technology for teaching and learning: Designing instruction, integrating computers, and using media (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Prentice-Hall.</p><p></p><p>Noble, Julie P., Roberts, William L. and Sawyer Richard L. (2006). Student Achievement, Behavior, Perceptions, and Other Factors Affecting ACT Scores. ACT Research Report Series 2006 - 1.</p><p></p><p>Nornadiah Mohd Razali & Yap Bee Wah. (2011). Power comparisons of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anderson-Darling tests. Journal of Statistical Modeling and Analytics, Vol.2 No.I, 21-33.</p><p></p><p>Oblinger, D., Oblinger, J. (2005). Educating the Net-generation: Educause http://www.educause.edu/educatingthenetgen</p><p></p><p>OMalley, C., Vavoula, G., Glew, J.P., Taylor, J., Sharples, M., &Lefrere, P. (2003). MOBIlearn WP4 Guidelines for Learning/Teaching/Tutoring in a Mobile Environment. Retrieved from: http://www.mobilearn.org/download/results/guidelines.pdf.</p><p></p><p>Ormrod, J. (1995). Human learning: theories, principles, and educational applications.New York: Merrill.</p><p></p><p>Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies. What every teacher should know.New York: Newbury House.</p><p></p><p>Oye , N.D., Salleh, M., & lahad, N. A, (2010). Holistic E-learning in Nigerian Higher Education Institutions. Journal of Computing, 2(11), 20-26.</p><p></p><p>Oztuna D, Elhan AH, Tuccar E. (2006). Investigation of four different normality tests in terms of type 1 error rate and power under different distributions. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences. 36(3):1716.</p><p></p><p>Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D. & Bjork, R. (2008). Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(3), 105-119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01038.x</p><p></p><p>Patten, B., Sanchez, A. I., & Tangney, B. (2006). Designing Collaborative, Constructionist and Contextual Applications for Handheld Devices: Virtual Learning. Computers and Education, 46, 294-308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.011</p><p></p><p>PCACT/PET (Evaluation and Educational Policy Analysis/Panel on Educational Technology). (1997). Report to the President on the use of technology to strengthen K-12 education in the United States. Washington, DC: Presidents Committee of Advisors on Science and Technology.</p><p></p><p>Phipps, R., & Merisotis, J. (1999). Whats the difference? A review of contemporary research on the effectiveness of distance learning in higher education.</p><p></p><p>Plato. (1991). Republic. Translated by Allan Bloom. NY: Basic Books.</p><p></p><p>Portio Research. (2012). The next billion: Strategies for driving growth and making profits in low ARPU mobile markets.</p><p></p><p>Portio Research (2013), Mobile Applications Futures 2013-2017 http://www.portioresearch.com/en/mobile-industry-reports/mobile-industry- researchreports/mobile-applicationsfutures-2013-2017.aspx</p><p></p><p>Prensky, M. (2005). What can you learn from a cell phone? Almost anything! Innovate Journal of Online Education, 1(5).</p><p></p><p>Rahimian, V., &Ramsin, R. (2008). Designing an Agile Methodology for Mobile Software Development: A Hybrid Method Engineering Approach. Second International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science, 2008. RCIS 2008, (pp. 337-342). Marrakech.</p><p></p><p>Raychaudhury, Amitawa., Debnath, Manojit., Sen, Saswata & Majumder, Braja Gopal. (2010). Factors Affecting Students Academic Performance: A Case Study in Agartala Municipal Council Area. Bangladesh e-journal of Sociology, Vol. 7, No. 2.</p><p></p><p>Redmond, Petrea. 2011. From face-to-face teaching to online teaching: pedagogical transitions . In ASCILITE 2011: 28th annual conference of the Australasian Society for computers in learning in tertiary education: Changing demands, changing directions, 47 Dec 2011, Hobart. http://eprints.usq.edu.au/ 20400/. Accessed 20 July 2014.</p><p></p><p>Research Advisor (2007). Sample size table. http://www.research-advisors.com/ documents/SampleSize-web.xls adresinden 17 Eyll 2007 tarihinde edinilmitir.</p><p></p><p>Rideout, V., Saphir, M., Tsang, V., &Bozdech, B. (2011). Zero to eight: Childrens media use in America (pp. 1- 44). San Francisco, CA: Common Sense Media.</p><p></p><p>Robert Heinich, Michael Molenda, and James D. Russell. (1989). Instructional media and the new technologies of instruction, Macmillan, New York.</p><p></p><p>Robson, C (2002), Real World Research (Blackwell, Oxford).</p><p></p><p>Ryan Seilhamer, Baiyun Chen, and Amy Sugar, "A Framework for Implementing Mobile Technology," in Handbook of Mobile Learning, Z. Zane Berge and Lin Muilenburg, eds. (Routledge, 2013), pp. 382394.</p><p></p><p>Saavedra, A. R., & Opfer, V. D. (2012). Teaching and learning 21st century skills: Lessons from the Learning Sciences. Rand Corporation.</p><p></p><p>Safaat, Nazruddin. 2012. Android : Pemprograman Aplikasi Mobile Smartphone dan Tablet PC Berbasis Android. Bandung: Informatika.</p><p></p><p>Sala S., 2014 Typography Cheat Sheet: The 6 Big Mistakes to Avoid http://www.sitepoint.com/typography-cheat-sheet/</p><p></p><p>Salam, S.; Wandi, M.H.; Hashim, N.; Mohamed, M.M.; Saifudin, W.S.N.; Ahmad, I. (2008). A Study on the Usability of Mobile Multimedia Learning Applications for Children. Paper presented at Mobile Learning & Edutainment Conference 2008. Retrieved from http://www.lttcom.com/mlearning2008/index.php?mod=public&opt=home</p><p></p><p>Sarasin, Lynne Celli. (1998). At wood: Madison Learning Style Perspectives: Impact in the Classroom WI, ISBN 1-891859-22-6.</p><p></p><p>Schunk, D. (2008). Learning theories: An educational perspective, Pearson Education, Upper Saddle Hill, NJ,</p><p></p><p>Sek, Y.-W., lau, S.-H., teoh, K.-K., Law, C.-Y., & Parumo, S. B. (2010). Prediction of User Acceptance and Adoption of Smart Phone for Learning with Technology Acceptance Model. Journal of Applied Sciences 10(20).</p><p></p><p>Sergey E.L. (2002). Mechatronics curriculum retrospect and prospect, Mechatronics, 12(2), pp. 195-205.</p><p></p><p>Shakil Jamal. (2012). Make differences between Application and System Software. Retrieved from https://experiencewave.wordpress.com/2012/04/23/make- differences-between-application-and-system-software/ M. Sharpe. (2003). Disruptive devices: Mobile technology for conversational learning, International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Lifelong Learning, 12(5/6), pp. 504520.</p><p></p><p>Sharples, M. (2000) The design of personal mobile technologies for lifelong learning, Computers & Education, Vol. 34, pp. 177-193.</p><p></p><p>Sharples, M. (2002). Disruptive devices: mobile technology for conversational learning. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life Long Learning, 12(5/6), 504-520.</p><p></p><p>Sharples, M., Taylor, J., & Vavoula, G. (2007). A Theory of Learning for the Mobile Age. The Sage Handbook of E-learning Research, London: Sage.</p><p></p><p>Sheingold, K., & Hadley, M. (1990). Accomplished teachers: Integrating computers into classroom practice. New York: Center for Technology in Education, Bank Street College of Education.</p><p></p><p>Shudong, W., & Higgins, M. (2006). Limitations of mobile phone learning. The JALT CALL Journal, 2(1), 3-14.</p><p></p><p>Seels, B. B. & Richey, R. C. (1994). Instructional technology: The definition and domains of the field. Bloomington, IN: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.</p><p></p><p>Siemens, G. (2004) Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age. http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/connectivism.html</p><p></p><p>Siemens, G. (2006). Knowing Knowledge, Lulu.com.</p><p></p><p>Smyth, E., Steinmetz, S. 2008. Field of study and gender segregation in European labour markets. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, Vol. 49, Nos. 4-5, 257-281.</p><p></p><p>Snyder, J.H. and West, R.F. (1992). The effects of retention in elementary school on subsequent academic performance. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Knoxville in November 1992.</p><p></p><p>Solomon, G. (2003). Project-based learning: a premier. Retrieved from http://pennstate.swsd.wikispaces.net/file/view/PBL-Primer www_techlearning_com.pdf</p><p></p><p>Stone, A. (2004). Designing scalable, effective mobile learning for multiple technologies. In: Jill Attewell and Carol Savill-Smith (eds.) Learning with mobile devices, 145-153.</p><p></p><p>Suskie, L. (2002). Theories and instruments for identifying student learning styles. http://wwwnew.towson.edu/iact/teaching/Suskie</p><p></p><p>Tabuenca, B., Ternier, S., Specht, M., 2012. Everyday patterns in lifelong learners to build personal learning ecologies, in: Proceedings of the 11th World Conference on Mobile and Contextual Learning. Helsinki, Finland, pp. 8693.</p><p></p><p>Taylor, M. (2005). Generation Next: Todays postmodern studentmeeting, teaching, and serving. A collection of papers on self-study and institutional improvement, 2(4).</p><p></p><p>Teaster, P., & Blieszner, R. (1999). Promises and pitfalls of the interactive television approach to teaching adult development and aging. Educational Gerontology, 25 (8), 741-754.</p><p></p><p>Tella, S. (2003). M-learningCybertextual traveling or a herald of Post-Modern education? In H. Kynslahti& P. Seppl (Eds.), Professional mobile learning (pp. 7-21). Helsinki: IT Press. Retrieved from http://www.helsinki.fi/~tella/mlearningtella.pdf</p><p></p><p>Ting, Y. R. (2005). Mobile Learning: Current Trend and future Challenges. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.</p><p></p><p>Tinio, V. L. (2003). ICT in education. Bangkok: UNDP-Asia Pacific Development Information Programme (APDIP). Retrieved from http://www.apdip.net/publications/iespprimers/eprimer-edu.pdf</p><p></p><p>Tth, P.: Learning Strategies and Styles in Vocational Education, Vol.9, No.3, 2012 Traxler, J. (2005). Mobile learning- its here but what is it? Interactions 9, 1. Warwick: University of Warwick.</p><p></p><p>Traxler, J. (2009). Current state of mobile learning1. Mobile Learning, 9.</p><p></p><p>Triantafillou, E., Pomportsis, A., &Demetriadis, S. (2003). The design and the formative evaluation of an adaptive educational system based on cognitive style. Computers &Education, 41, 87-103.</p><p></p><p>Trinder, J. (2005). Mobile Technologies and Systems. In A. &. Kuklska-Hulme (Ed.), Mobile learning: A handbook for educators and trainers, USA: Taylor & Francis.</p><p></p><p>Tsai, P. S., Tsai, C. C., & Hwang, G. H. (2015). The effects of instructional methods on students' learning outcomes requiring different cognitive abilities: context-aware ubiquitous learning versus traditional instruction. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-14.</p><p></p><p>Tsinidou, M., Gerogiannis, V., & Fitsilis, P. (2010). Evaluation of the factors that determine quality in higher education: an empirical study. Quality Assurance in Education, 18(3), 227-244.</p><p></p><p>Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading, PA: Addison-Wesley. Uden, L. (2007). Activity Theory for Designing Mobile Learning. Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 1 (1), 81-102.</p><p></p><p>UNESCO. (2004). Changing Teaching Practices using curriculum differentiation to respond to students diversity, retrieved July 26, 2018 from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001365/136583e.pdf</p><p></p><p>Urdan, T. A., & Weggen, C. C. (2000). Corporate e-learning: Exploring a new frontier. WR Hambrecht Co.</p><p></p><p>Ullrich, C., Shen, R., Tong, R., & Tan, X. (2010). A mobile live video learning system for large-scale learning System design and evaluation. IEEE Trans. on Learning Technologies, 3(1), 6-11.</p><p></p><p>Van den Brande, L. (1993). Flexible and distance learning. Chichester, UK: John Wiley. Vavoula, G. (2004). KLeOS: A Knowledge and Learning Organisation System in Support of Lifelong Learning. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Birmingham, UK</p><p></p><p>Volery, T. & Lord, D. (2000). Critical success factors in online education. The International Journal of Educational Management, 14(5), 216-223.</p><p></p><p>Walker, K. (2007). Introduction: Mapping the Landscape of Mobile Learning. In M. Sharples (Ed.), Big Issue in Mobile Learning: A Report of a New Workshop by the Kaleidoscope Network of Excellence Mobile Learning Initiative. Learning Science and Research Institution, University of Nottingham, UK, pp: 5-6.</p><p></p><p>Wang, S. L. & Shiu, S. (2005). The impact of networked group interaction on group efficacy and group performance. Paper presented at the 2005 international conference of learning, instruction and assessment. Taipei, Taiwan.</p><p></p><p>Wang, Y. S., Wu, M.-C., & Wang, H.-Y. (2008). Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 92-118.</p><p></p><p>Wang, M., Shen, R., Novak, D., & Pan, X. (2009). The impact of mobile learning on students' learning behaviours and performance: Report from a large blended classroom. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40, 673695. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00846.</p><p></p><p>Wang, R., Wiesemes, R., & Gibbons, C. (2012). Developing digital fluency through ubiquitous mobile devices: Findings from a small-scale study. Computers&Education, 58(1), 570-578. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.013</p><p></p><p>Wains, S. I. and Mahmood, W., 2008, Integrating m-learning with e-learning. 9th ACM SIGITE Conference on Information Technology Education, Cincinnati, USA, pp. 31-38.</p><p></p><p>Warschauer, M. (2000). Technology and school reform: A view from both sides of the track. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(4).</p><p></p><p>Watson, J. f., & Kalmon, S. (2005). Keeping pace with K12 online learning: A review of state-level policy and practice. Naperville, IL: Learning Point Associates. Retrieved from http://www.learningpt.org/pdfs/tech/Keeping_Pace2.pdf.</p><p></p><p>Whitney, L. (2012). Android reclaims 61 percent of all U.S. smartphone sales | Internet & Media - CNET News. Retrieved January 16, 2014 from http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-57429192-93/android-reclaims-61-percent- of-all-u.s-smartphone-sales/.</p><p></p><p>Williams, A.J & Pence, H.E (2011). Smart phones, a powerful tool in Chemistry classroom, Journal of Chemical Education, 88, 683-686.</p><p></p><p>Williams, B. (2006). Handheld Computers and Smartphones in Secondary Schools. Eugene: International Society for Technology in Education.</p><p></p><p>Willingham, D. (2008). Learning styles dont exist. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sIv9rz2NTUk</p><p></p><p>Wilson, L. O. (2013). Anderson and Krathwohl - Blooms Taxonomy Revised. The Second Principle. The work of Leslie Owen Wilson. Ed. D. Can be retrieved at http://thesecondprinciple.com/teaching-essentials/beyond-bloom-cognitive- taxonomy-revised</p><p></p><p>Wim Veen, 2002. Celebrating homo zappiens: adapting to new ways of learning using ICT. Available at: http://www.britishcouncil.orgleducation!conference/ 2002/ seminar_doc.</p><p></p><p>W.H. Wu, J. Y. C. Wu, C. Y. Chen, H. Y. Kao, C. H. Lin and S. H. Huang. (2012). Review of trends from mobile learning studies: A meta-analysis, Computers & Education, 59(2), pp. 817827.</p><p></p><p>Wolfman, S. A., & Bates, R. A. (2005). Kinesthetic learning in the classroom. CCSC. 203-206.</p><p></p><p>Yamaguchi, 2005 Yamaguchi, T., (2005). Vocabulary learning with a mobile phone. Program of the l0th Anniversary Conference of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, Edinburgh, UK.</p><p></p><p>Yang, Y., & Cornelious, L. F. (2005). Preparing instructors for quality online instruction. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 8(1), 116.</p><p></p><p>Venkatesh, V., Morris M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.</p><p></p><p>Viberg, O. (2015). Design and use of mobile technology in distance language education: Matching learning practices with technologies-in-practice. Repro: rebro University.</p><p></p><p>Young-KyunBaek& Dong-Uk Cheong (2005). Present and Future for Mobile Learning in Korea. Proceeding of the IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education (WMTE 05).</p><p></p><p>Zickuhr, K. (2012). Generations and their gadgets. Pew Research Center. Retrieved January 20, 2013, from http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/Generations-and- gadgets.</p> |