Pembangunan Modul Pembelajaran Kendiri Pengamiran (InSel) bagi pelajar matrikulasi
<p>Kajian ini bertujuan membangunkan Modul Pembelajaran Kendiri Pengamiran</p><p>(Integration Self Learning Module Modul InSeL) bagi pelajar matrikulasi.</p><p>Pembangunan modul ini berdasarkan Teori Pembelajaran Kognitif, pembin...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | thesis |
| Language: | zsm |
| Published: |
2021
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=7164 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| id |
oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:7164 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
uketd_dc |
| institution |
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| collection |
UPSI Digital Repository |
| language |
zsm |
| topic |
QA Mathematics |
| spellingShingle |
QA Mathematics Khairulazuad Husain Pembangunan Modul Pembelajaran Kendiri Pengamiran (InSel) bagi pelajar matrikulasi |
| description |
<p>Kajian ini bertujuan membangunkan Modul Pembelajaran Kendiri Pengamiran</p><p>(Integration Self Learning Module Modul InSeL) bagi pelajar matrikulasi.</p><p>Pembangunan modul ini berdasarkan Teori Pembelajaran Kognitif, pembinaan konsep</p><p>Matematik, kemahiran berfikir dan pembelajaran kendiri. Pembangunan modul</p><p>menggunakan Model Sidek melibatkan dua peringkat iaitu membina draf modul dan</p><p>pengujian modul. Kajian reka bentuk dan pembangunan (DDR) ini menggunakan tiga</p><p>set soal selidik untuk menilai kesahan, kebolehpercayaan dan kesesuaian modul.</p><p>Instrumen penilaian telah disahkan oleh dua orang pakar dengan nilai pekali</p><p>kebolehpercayaan Alfa Cronbach bagi instrumen kebolehpercayaan dan kesesuaian</p><p>ialah 0.93 dan 0.92 yang dibuat melalui ujian rintis. Kesahan kandungan terhadap</p><p>Modul InSeL dibuat oleh tujuh orang pakar yang dilantik dan nilai kesahan ditentukan</p><p>melalui indeks kesahan kandungan (CVI). Nilai keseluruhan indeks kesahan</p><p>kandungan Modul InSeL adalah tinggi iaitu 0.99 atau 99 peratus bagi kedua-dua nilai</p><p>CVI bagi item (I-CVI) dan CVI bagi skala (S-CVI). Seramai 73 orang pelajar matrikulasi</p><p>terlibat dalam kajian ini bagi menguji kebolehpercayaan dan kesesuaian modul yang</p><p>dibangunkan. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan nilai pekali Alfa Cronbach bagi</p><p>kebolehpercayaan Modul InSeL adalah memuaskan iaitu 0.775. Hasil daripada</p><p>analisis soal selidik tahap kesesuaian menunjukkan Modul InSeL mencapai tahap</p><p>peratus persetujuan yang tinggi iaitu melebihi 90% dengan min bagi ketiga-tiga</p><p>konstruk iaitu isi kandungan (3.43), format persembahan (3.49) dan sumber rujukan</p><p>(3.38). Ini menunjukkan secara keseluruhan Modul InSeL telah memenuhi piawaian</p><p>sesuatu modul dari aspek kandungan dan kualiti modul. Kesimpulannya, kajian ini</p><p>berjaya menghasilkan satu Modul Pembelajaran Kendiri Matematik bagi topik</p><p>Pengamiran bagi pelajar matrikulasi yang menepati keperluan silibus yang telah</p><p>ditetapkan. Implikasinya, Modul InSeL membolehkan pelajar mempelajari topik</p><p>Pengamiran secara kendiri.</p> |
| format |
thesis |
| qualification_name |
|
| qualification_level |
Master's degree |
| author |
Khairulazuad Husain |
| author_facet |
Khairulazuad Husain |
| author_sort |
Khairulazuad Husain |
| title |
Pembangunan Modul Pembelajaran Kendiri Pengamiran (InSel) bagi pelajar matrikulasi |
| title_short |
Pembangunan Modul Pembelajaran Kendiri Pengamiran (InSel) bagi pelajar matrikulasi |
| title_full |
Pembangunan Modul Pembelajaran Kendiri Pengamiran (InSel) bagi pelajar matrikulasi |
| title_fullStr |
Pembangunan Modul Pembelajaran Kendiri Pengamiran (InSel) bagi pelajar matrikulasi |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Pembangunan Modul Pembelajaran Kendiri Pengamiran (InSel) bagi pelajar matrikulasi |
| title_sort |
pembangunan modul pembelajaran kendiri pengamiran (insel) bagi pelajar matrikulasi |
| granting_institution |
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| granting_department |
Fakulti Sains dan Matematik |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| url |
https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=7164 |
| _version_ |
1747833364202651648 |
| spelling |
oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:71642022-06-15 Pembangunan Modul Pembelajaran Kendiri Pengamiran (InSel) bagi pelajar matrikulasi 2021 Khairulazuad Husain QA Mathematics <p>Kajian ini bertujuan membangunkan Modul Pembelajaran Kendiri Pengamiran</p><p>(Integration Self Learning Module Modul InSeL) bagi pelajar matrikulasi.</p><p>Pembangunan modul ini berdasarkan Teori Pembelajaran Kognitif, pembinaan konsep</p><p>Matematik, kemahiran berfikir dan pembelajaran kendiri. Pembangunan modul</p><p>menggunakan Model Sidek melibatkan dua peringkat iaitu membina draf modul dan</p><p>pengujian modul. Kajian reka bentuk dan pembangunan (DDR) ini menggunakan tiga</p><p>set soal selidik untuk menilai kesahan, kebolehpercayaan dan kesesuaian modul.</p><p>Instrumen penilaian telah disahkan oleh dua orang pakar dengan nilai pekali</p><p>kebolehpercayaan Alfa Cronbach bagi instrumen kebolehpercayaan dan kesesuaian</p><p>ialah 0.93 dan 0.92 yang dibuat melalui ujian rintis. Kesahan kandungan terhadap</p><p>Modul InSeL dibuat oleh tujuh orang pakar yang dilantik dan nilai kesahan ditentukan</p><p>melalui indeks kesahan kandungan (CVI). Nilai keseluruhan indeks kesahan</p><p>kandungan Modul InSeL adalah tinggi iaitu 0.99 atau 99 peratus bagi kedua-dua nilai</p><p>CVI bagi item (I-CVI) dan CVI bagi skala (S-CVI). Seramai 73 orang pelajar matrikulasi</p><p>terlibat dalam kajian ini bagi menguji kebolehpercayaan dan kesesuaian modul yang</p><p>dibangunkan. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan nilai pekali Alfa Cronbach bagi</p><p>kebolehpercayaan Modul InSeL adalah memuaskan iaitu 0.775. Hasil daripada</p><p>analisis soal selidik tahap kesesuaian menunjukkan Modul InSeL mencapai tahap</p><p>peratus persetujuan yang tinggi iaitu melebihi 90% dengan min bagi ketiga-tiga</p><p>konstruk iaitu isi kandungan (3.43), format persembahan (3.49) dan sumber rujukan</p><p>(3.38). Ini menunjukkan secara keseluruhan Modul InSeL telah memenuhi piawaian</p><p>sesuatu modul dari aspek kandungan dan kualiti modul. Kesimpulannya, kajian ini</p><p>berjaya menghasilkan satu Modul Pembelajaran Kendiri Matematik bagi topik</p><p>Pengamiran bagi pelajar matrikulasi yang menepati keperluan silibus yang telah</p><p>ditetapkan. Implikasinya, Modul InSeL membolehkan pelajar mempelajari topik</p><p>Pengamiran secara kendiri.</p> 2021 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=7164 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=7164 text zsm closedAccess Masters Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Sains dan Matematik <p>Abdu-Raheem, B. O. (2014). Improvisation of instruction- al materials for teaching and</p><p>learning in secondary schools as predictor of high academic standard. Nigerian</p><p>Journal of Social Studies, 17(1), 131-143.</p><p></p><p>Adel, A. M., & Kurniawati, Y. (2018). Phase Design Development Of Calculus 2 Module</p><p>Based Inquiry In Fkip Ummy Solok. Proceeding IAIN Batusangkar, 2nd</p><p>International Seminar on Education 2017 Empowering Local Wisdom on</p><p>Education for Global Issue1(2), 31-34.</p><p></p><p>Amalia, M., & Sidek, M. N. (2013). An application of the Sidek module development in</p><p>Rebt counseling intervention module design for orphans. Procedia-Social and</p><p>Behavioral Sciences, 84, 1481-1491.</p><p></p><p>Amani, D. (2014). Pembangunan modul m-pembelajaran Bahasa Arab di Institut</p><p>Pendidikan Guru (Doctoral dissertation, University of Malaya).</p><p></p><p>Anderson, L. W. & Krathwohl, D. R., et al (Eds..) (2001) A Taxonomy for Learning,</p><p>Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Blooms Taxonomy of Educational</p><p>Objectives. Allyn & Bacon. Boston, MA (Pearson Education Group)</p><p></p><p>Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E.,</p><p>Pintrich, P. R., et al. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and</p><p>Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New</p><p>York: Longman.</p><p></p><p>Andriani, A., Dewi, I., & Halomoan, B. (2018). Development of Mathematics Learning</p><p>Strategy Module, Based on Higher Order Thinking Skill (Hots) To Improve</p><p>Mathematic Communication And Self Efficacy On Students Mathematics</p><p>Department. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 970, 012028.</p><p>https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/970/1/012028</p><p></p><p>Arango, J., Gaviria, D., & Valencia, A. (2015). Differential calculus teaching through</p><p>virtual learning objects in the field of management sciences. Procedia-Social</p><p>and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 412-418.</p><p>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.490</p><p></p><p>Ariefiani, Z., Kustono, D., & Pathmantara, S. (2016, October). Module development</p><p>with project-based learning approach and assure development model. In AIP</p><p>Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1778, No. 1, p. 030036). AIP Publishing LLC.</p><p></p><p>Arsyad, N., Rahman, A., & Ahmar, A. S. (2017). Developing a self-learning model</p><p>based on open-ended questions to increase the students creativity in calculus.</p><p>Global Journal of Engineering Education, 19(2), 143147.</p><p>https://doi.org/10.26858/gjeev19i2y2017p143147</p><p></p><p>Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Irvine, C. K. S., & Walker, D. (2018). Introduction to research in</p><p>education. Cengage Learning.</p><p></p><p>Bahagian Matrikulasi, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2020).</p><p></p><p>Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan Pelajaran, Kementerian Pendidikan</p><p>Malaysia. (2020).</p><p></p><p>Baheiraei, A., Khoori, E., Ahmadi, F., Foroushani, A. R., Ghofranipour, F., & Weiler, R.</p><p>M. (2013). Psychometric properties of the adolescent health concern inventory:</p><p>the Persian version. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry, 8(1), 2836.</p><p></p><p>Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Vol. 1: Cognitive</p><p>domain. New York: McKay, 20, 24.</p><p></p><p>Branch, R. M., & Kopcha, T. J. (2014). Instructional design models. In Handbook of</p><p>research on educational communications and technology (pp. 77-87).</p><p>Springer, New York, NY.</p><p></p><p>Bressoud, D., Ghedamsi, I., Martinez-Luaces, V., & Trner, G. (2016). Teaching and</p><p>Learning of Calculus (ICME-13 Topical Surveys) (1st ed. 2016 ed.). Springer.</p><p></p><p>Calucag, L. S. Self-Paced Instruction and Mathematics Achievement.</p><p></p><p>Carter, J. D., Helliwell, D., Henrich, A., Principe, M., & Sloughter, J. M. (2015).</p><p>Improving Student Success in Calculus at Seattle University. PRIMUS, 26(2),</p><p>105124. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2015.1067264</p><p></p><p>Chaudhary, N., Kumar, S. & Shankar, G. (2007). Experiences in Sharing of Printed</p><p>Instructional Materials for Distance Learning. Indian Journal of Open Learning,</p><p>16(3), 254-266. Indira Gandhi National Open University. Retrieved September</p><p>1, 2020 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/187787/.</p><p></p><p>Charles, M., & Saikumar, N. (2018). Impact of concept mapping and modular learning</p><p>techniques on pupils achievement for the selected topics in</p><p>mathematics. American Journal of Educational Research, 6(6), 649-657.</p><p></p><p>Chen, F. M. (2016). Modular Approach to Introduce Multivariate Calculus in</p><p>Thermodynamics Class. Journal of the Chinese Chemical Society, 63(5), 445</p><p>449. https://doi.org/10.1002/jccs.201500539</p><p></p><p>Chew, E. S., Abd Hamid, M. A., & Madar, A. R. (2017). Conceptual framework for</p><p>designing and developing a creativity enhancement module in education</p><p>incorporating indigenous perspectives. Pertanika Journal of Social Science</p><p>and Humanities, 25(S), 67-82.</p><p></p><p>Chiek, P. O., & Zaidatun, T. (2015). Self-instructional module based on cognitive load</p><p>theory: a study on information retention among trainee teachers. Educational</p><p>Technology Research and Development, 63(4), 499515.</p><p>https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9383-8</p><p></p><p>Clayton M. Edwards. (2013). Self-Paced Mathematical Instruction. Mathematics</p><p>Teaching in the Middle School, 19(4), 230.</p><p>https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacmiddscho.19.4.0230</p><p></p><p>Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2013). Research methods in education.</p><p>routledge.</p><p></p><p>Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and</p><p>psychological measurement, 20(1), 37-46.</p><p></p><p>Connelly, L. M. (2008). Pilot studies. Medsurg Nursing, 17(6), 411.</p><p></p><p>Cragg, L., & Gilmore, C. (2014). Skills underlying mathematics: The role of executive</p><p>function in the development of mathematics proficiency. Trends in</p><p>Neuroscience and Education, 3(2), 63-68.</p><p>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2013.12.001</p><p></p><p>Creswell, J. W., & Guetterman, T. C. (2018). Educational Research: Planning,</p><p>Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research plus MyLab</p><p>Education with Enhanced Pearson eText -- ... New in Ed Psych / Tests &</p><p>Measurements) (6th ed.). Pearson.</p><p></p><p>Curry, J. H., Johnson, S., & Peacock, R. (2020). Robert Gagn and the Systematic</p><p>Design of Instruction. Design for Learning.</p><p></p><p>Crawford, P., Moseley, D., Nancarrow, M., & Ward, E. (2018). Calculus Challenges:</p><p>An Active Learning Approach. PRIMUS, 28(6), 616625.</p><p>https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2017.1387630</p><p></p><p>Dane, A., etin, . F., Bas, F., & zturan Sarl, M. (2016). A Conceptual and</p><p>Procedural Research on the Hierarchical Structure of Mathematics Emerging</p><p>in the Minds of University Students: An Example of Limit-Continuity-Integral-</p><p>Derivative. International Journal of Higher Education, 5(2), 8291.</p><p>https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v5n2p82</p><p></p><p>Darwazeh, A. N., & Branch, R. M. (2015). A revision to the revised Blooms taxonomy.</p><p>A Proceedings paper presented at the annual meeting of the American</p><p>Association for Educational Communications and Technology (Vol. 2),</p><p>Indianapolis, IN.</p><p></p><p>Daza, V., Makriyannis, N., & Rovira Riera, C. (2013). MOOC attack: closing the gap</p><p>between pre-university and university mathematics. Open Learning: The</p><p>Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 28(3), 227238.</p><p>https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2013.872558</p><p></p><p>Dey, N., & Chaudhary, S. V. S. (2016). The Perception of B. Ed. Students on Printed</p><p>Self-Learning Material and Learning Style in ODL.</p><p></p><p>Devesh, S., & Nasseri, D. A. (2014). Effectiveness of Mathematics Module in</p><p>Foundation Programme in Majan College. International Journal of Emerging</p><p>Engineering Research and Technology, 2(1), 1-7.</p><p></p><p>DeVon, H. A., Block ,M. E., Moyle-Wright, P., Ernst, D. M., Hayden, S. J. & Lazzara,</p><p>D. J., A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability. J Nurs Scholarsh</p><p>2007; 39 (2): 155-64.</p><p></p><p>Dhamija, N., & Kanchan. (2014). Effectiveness of Self Learning Modules on the</p><p>Achievement and Retention of Undergraduate Students in Commerce</p><p>Educationia Confab 3 26-32.</p><p></p><p>Dick, W., & Carey, L., (2001). The Systemic Design of Instruction.</p><p>United State: Addison - Wesley Educational Publishers Inc</p><p></p><p>Dolnicar, S., Grun, B., Leisch, F., & Rossiter, J. (2011). Three good reasons NOT to</p><p>use five and seven point Likert items.</p><p></p><p>Durn, A.J., Prez, M., & Varona, J.L. (2014). The Misfortunes of a Trio of</p><p>Mathematicians Using Computer Algebra Systems. Can We Trust in Them?</p><p>Notices of the AMS, 61(10), 1249-1252. Available at:</p><p>http://www.ams.org/notices/201410/rnoti-p1249.pdf</p><p>https://doi.org/10.1090/noti1173</p><p></p><p>Effandi, Z., Johari, M. Y., Mistima, S. M., & Mazlini, A. (2010). Conceptual knowledge</p><p>and mathematics achievement of matriculation students. Procedia - Social and</p><p>Behavioral Sciences, 9, 10201024.</p><p>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.279</p><p></p><p>Effandi , Z., & Salwani, T. S. (2015). Using Technology in Learning Integral Calculus.</p><p>Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 144.</p><p>https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n5s1p144</p><p></p><p>Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (2013). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism:</p><p>Comparing critical features from an instructional design</p><p>perspective. Performance improvement quarterly, 26(2), 43-71.</p><p></p><p>Ferrer, P. F. (2016). Investigating Students Learning Difficulties In Integral Calculus.</p><p>People: International Journal of Social Sciences, 2(1), 310324.</p><p>https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2016.s21.310324</p><p></p><p>Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). Internal validity. How to design</p><p>and evaluate research in education. New York: McGraw-Hill, 166-83.</p><p></p><p>Gagne, R. M. (1974). Educational technology and the learning process. Educational</p><p>Researcher, 3(1), 3-8.</p><p></p><p>Gagne, R. M. (1985). The Conditions of Learning and Theory of Instruction</p><p>(Subsequent ed.). Wadsworth Pub Co.</p><p></p><p>Gagne, R. M., Wager, W. W., Goals, K. C., & Keller, J. M. (2005). Principles of</p><p>instructional design (5th ed.). CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning, Publishers.</p><p></p><p>Ghazali, D., & Sufean, H. (2016). Research Methodology in Education. Kuala Lumpur:</p><p>University of Malaya Publisher.</p><p></p><p>Norhashidah, M. G., Effendi, E. M. M., & Norasmah, O. (2019). Pengujian Ciri-Ciri</p><p>Psikometrik Instrumen Penilaian Nilai dan Etika dalam Kalangan Guru</p><p>Menggunakan Model Rasch. International Journal of Education and</p><p>Pedagogy, 1(1), 21-36.</p><p></p><p>Gilbert, G. E., & Prion, S. (2016). Making sense of methods and measurement:</p><p>Lawshe's Content Validity Index. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 12(12), 530-</p><p>531.</p><p></p><p>Go Silk, C.J., Go Silk, B.B. & Somblingo, R.A. (2017). Modular Approach in Teaching</p><p>Problem Solving: A Metacognitive Process. International Journal of Science</p><p>and Research (IJSR), Volume 6 Issue 8, August 2017. Doi:</p><p>10.21275/ART20175782</p><p></p><p>Gonzales, E. E. (2015). A Modular Approach Utilizing Decision Tree in Teaching</p><p>Integration Techniques in Calculus. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary</p><p>Research, 3(3), 52-58.</p><p></p><p>Gore, S., Goldberg, A., Huang, M. H., Shoemaker, M., & Blackwood, J. (2019).</p><p>Development and validation of a quality appraisal tool for validity studies</p><p>(QAVALS). Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, 1-9.</p><p></p><p>Hair, J.F.Jr., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J. & Anderson, R.E. (2014). Multivariate Data</p><p>Analysis. 7th Edition. United States of America: Pearson Education Limited.</p><p></p><p>Hamidah, M. (2019). Development and Effect of Integrated Science Process Skills</p><p>Module Towards Higher Order Thinking Skills Based on Edutainment.</p><p>International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences,</p><p>9(2), 919931.</p><p></p><p>Hashemi, N., Abu, M. S., Kashefi, H., Mokhtar, M., & Rahimi, K. (2015). Designing</p><p>Learning Strategy toImprove Undergraduate Students Problem Solving in</p><p>Derivatives and Integrals: A Conceptual Framework. EURASIA Journal of</p><p>Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(2), 219230.</p><p>https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1318a</p><p></p><p>Hatch, D. K., Mardock-Uman, N., & Nelson, M. J. (2017). Content Validation of the</p><p>Community College Student Success Program Inventory. Community College</p><p>Journal of Research and Practice, 42(6), 439444.</p><p>https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2017.1323694</p><p></p><p>Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J.D. and Smaldino, S.E. (2008). Instructional</p><p>media and technologies for learning , Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.</p><p></p><p>Hiebert, J. & Lefevre, P. (1986). Conceptual and Procedura/ Knowledge in</p><p>Mathematics: An Introductory Analysis (pp. 1-27). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum</p><p></p><p>Hiebert, J. & Carpenter, T. P. (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding. In D.</p><p>Grouws (Ed)., Handbooks for research in mathematics teaching and learning</p><p>(pp. 65 -97). New York: MacMillan.</p><p></p><p>Hoban, R. A. (2018). A resource for introducing students to the integral concept.</p><p>International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology,</p><p>50(4), 603616. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739x.2018.1480809</p><p></p><p>Hong, D. S., Choi, K. M., Hwang, J., & Runnalls, C. (2017). Integral Students</p><p>Experiences: Measuring Instructional Quality and Instructors Challenges in</p><p>Calculus 1 Lessons. International Journal Of Research In Education And</p><p>Science, 424. https://doi.org/10.21890/ijres.327901</p><p></p><p>Hsu, J., Hamilton, K., & Wang, J. (2015). Guided independent learning: a teaching and</p><p>learning approach for adult learners. International Journal of Innovation and</p><p>Learning, 17(1), 111. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijil.2015.066103</p><p></p><p>Huang. C. H. (2015). Calculus Students Visual Thinking of Definite Integral.</p><p>American Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 3, No. 4: 476-482. doi:</p><p>10.12691/education-3-4-14.</p><p></p><p>Huang, C. H. (2013). Engineering students visual thinking of the concept of definite</p><p>integral. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 15(2), 111-117.</p><p></p><p>Istikomah, E. (2020). Module Of Ict-Based Learning Mathematics: Response Of</p><p>Students In The Learning Process. Jurnal Pajar (Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran),</p><p>4(3), 569578. https://doi.org/10.33578/pjr.v4i3.7992</p><p></p><p>James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1993). rwg: An assessment of within-group</p><p>interrater agreement. Journal of applied psychology, 78(2), 306.</p><p></p><p>Jayaram, K. & Dorababu, K. K. (2015). Self learning materials in distance education</p><p>system, International Journal of Current Research, 7, (10), 21929-21934.</p><p></p><p>Jazim, Anwar, R. B., & Rahmawati, D. (2017). The Use of Mathematical Module Based</p><p>on Constructivism Approach as Media to Implant the Concept of Algebra</p><p>Operation. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 12(3),</p><p>579-583.</p><p></p><p>Johanson, G. A., & Brooks, G. P. (2010). Initial Scale Development: Sample Size for Pilot</p><p>Studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(3), 394</p><p>400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164409355692</p><p></p><p>Jones, S. R. (2013) Understanding the integral: Students symbolic forms. J. Math.</p><p>Behav., 32, 122141.</p><p></p><p>Josep Figueroa-Caas & Teresa Sancho-Vinuesa (2018): Investigating the</p><p>relationship between optional quizzes and final exam performance in a fully</p><p>asynchronous online calculus module, Interactive Learning Environments, DOI:</p><p>10.1080/10494820.2018.1559864</p><p></p><p>Kalthom, H., Puziah, A. W., Faeez, M. I., Amin, M. N., Izzudin, M. P. & Fariza, H.M.</p><p>(2017, September). Learning Management System Towards Learner's</p><p>Independent Learning. In 2nd International Conference on Education, Science,</p><p>and Technology (ICEST 2017). Atlantis Press.</p><p></p><p>Karakus, F., & Aydin, B. (2017). The Effects of Computer Algebra System on</p><p>Undergraduate Students' Spatial Visualization Skills in a Calculus</p><p>Course. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 5(3), 54-69.</p><p></p><p>Karjanto, N. (2013). Calculus teaching and learning in South Korea. Jurnal Matematika</p><p>Integratif, 9(2), 179. https://doi.org/10.24198/jmi.v9.n2.10194.179-193</p><p></p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (KPM). (2018).</p><p></p><p>Khalil, M. K., & Elkhider, I. A. (2016). Applying learning theories and instructional</p><p>design models for effective instruction. Advances in Physiology Education,</p><p>40(2), 147156. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00138.2015</p><p></p><p>Kouropatov, A. & Dreyfus, T. (2013) Constructing the integral concept on the basis of</p><p>the idea of accumulation: Suggestion for a high school curriculum. Int. J. Math.</p><p>Educ. Sci. Technol., 44, 641651.</p><p></p><p>Kouvela, E., Hernandez-Martinez, P., & Croft, T. (2017). This is what you need to be</p><p>learning: an analysis of messages received by first-year mathematics students</p><p>during their transition to university. Mathematics Education Research Journal,</p><p>30(2), 165183.https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-017-0226-2</p><p></p><p>Lasmiyati, L., & Harta, I. (2014). Pengembangan Modul Pembelajaran untuk</p><p>Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep dan Minat SMP. Pythagoras: Jurnal</p><p>Pendidikan Matematika, 9(2), 161-174.</p><p></p><p>Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel</p><p>psychology, 28(4), 563-575.</p><p></p><p>Li, Y. W. (2016). Transforming Conventional Teaching Classroom to Learner-Centred</p><p>Teaching Classroom Using Multimedia-Mediated Learning Module.</p><p>International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(2), 105112.</p><p>https://doi.org/10.7763/ijiet.2016.v6.667</p><p></p><p>Liang, L., Yeung, K., Lui, R. K. W., Cheung, W. M. Y., & Lam, K. F. (2018). Lessons</p><p>Learned from a Calculus E-Learning System for First-Year University Students</p><p>with Diverse Mathematics Backgrounds. In Distance Learning, E-Learning and</p><p>Blended Learning in Mathematics Education (pp. 69-92). Springer, Cham.</p><p></p><p>Lim, E.J.A. (2016). Effectiveness of Modular Instruction in Word Problem Solving of</p><p>BEED Students. IOSR Journal of Mathematics (IOSR-JM), Volume 12, Issue 5</p><p>Ver. VII (Sep. - Oct.2016), pp 59-65. Doi: 10.9790/5728-1205075965</p><p></p><p>Lindell, M. K., Brandt, C. J., & Whitney, D. J. (1999). A revised index of interrater</p><p>agreement for multi-item ratings of a single target. Applied Psychological</p><p>Measurement, 23(2), 127-135.</p><p></p><p>Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing</p><p>Research, 35, 382 385.</p><p></p><p>Maciejewski, W., & Star, J. R. (2016). Developing flexible procedural knowledge in</p><p>undergraduate calculus. Research in Mathematics Education, 18(3), 299316.</p><p>https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2016.1148626</p><p></p><p>Mahir, N. (2009). Conceptual and procedural performance of undergraduate students</p><p>in integration. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and</p><p>Technology, 40(2), 201211. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390802213591</p><p></p><p>Maisurah, S., Balqis, M., Norazah, U., & Fadzilawani, A. A. (2015). Mathematical errors</p><p>in advanced calculus: A survey among engineering students. Esteem</p><p>Academic Journal, 11(2), 37-44.</p><p></p><p>Mantiri, F. (2014). Multimedia and Technology in Learning. Universal Journal of</p><p>Educational Research, 2(9), 589-592.</p><p></p><p>Mary Anne, S. P., & Leong, K. E. (2014). Teaching and Learning Calculus in</p><p>Secondary Schools with the TI-Nspire. Malaysian Online Journal of</p><p>Educational Sciences, 2(1), 27-33.</p><p></p><p>McGriff, S. J. (2000). Instructional system design (ISD): Using the ADDIE</p><p>model. Retrieved June, 10(2003), 513-553.</p><p></p><p>Mei, C. A., Kok, W. N., Halimah, B. Z., Azlina, A., & Azizah, J. (2016, October).</p><p>Enhancing calculus learning via a student-centred web project. In AIP</p><p>Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1775, No. 1, p. 030101). AIP Publishing LLC.</p><p></p><p>Mendezabal, M. J., & Tindowen, D. J. (2018). Improving students attitude, conceptual</p><p>understanding and procedural skills in differential calculus through Microsoft</p><p>mathematics. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 8(4), 385.</p><p>https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.356</p><p></p><p>Mills, G. E., & Gay, L. R. (2018). Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis</p><p>and Applications (12th Edition) (12th ed.). Pearson.</p><p></p><p>Mohamad Ariffin, A. B., & Norulhuda, I. (2020). Development, Validity, And Reliability</p><p>Of Meta-Seller Tutoring Module. Asia Proceedings of Social Sciences, 5(2),</p><p>123-127.</p><p></p><p>Mohd Afifi, B.S., Norain, M. T., Mazlini, A., & Ikhwan, M. M. S. (2017). Adventure</p><p>Based Learning Module: Content Validity and Reliability Process. International</p><p>Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(2), 2222-</p><p>6990.</p><p></p><p>Mohd Afifi, B.S., Norain, M. T., & Mazlini, A. (2018). Basics Statistics Critical Thinking</p><p>Test: Reliability and Validity Issues. Jurnal Didaktik Matematika, 5(1), 1-15.</p><p></p><p>Mohd Effendi, E. M. M., & Zamri, A. K. (2015). Assessing the Content Validity of IKBAR</p><p>using Content Validity Ratio. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied</p><p>Sciences, 9(7), 255-257.</p><p></p><p>Mohd Effendi, E.M.M., Hisyamsani, I., Normawati, A.R., & Zamri A.K. (2017). Kesahan</p><p>Kandungan Pakar Instrumen Ikbar Bagi Pengukuran Aq Menggunakan Nisbah</p><p>Kesahan Kandungan. Proceeding of International Conference On Global</p><p>Education V (ICGE V), Global Education, Common Wealth and Cultural</p><p>Adversity; pp. 979 - 997</p><p></p><p>Mohd Nazri, H., Ramlee, M., Azimah, N. Y., & Rosnidar, M. (2017). Pembangunan</p><p>Modul Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi di dalam Mata Pelajaran Sains Sekolah</p><p>Rendah: Analisis Keperluan Guru. Sains Humanika, 9(15), 119125.</p><p>https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v9n1-5.1185</p><p></p><p>Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., & Kemp, J. E. (2010). Designing effective instruction .</p><p>Retrieved October 23, 2012.</p><p></p><p>Moses, P., Wong, S.L., Bakar, K.A., & Mahmud, R. (2013). Perceived usefulness and</p><p>perceived ease of use: antecedents of attitude towards laptop use among</p><p>science and mathematics teachers in Malaysia. The Asia-Pacific Education</p><p>Researcher, 22(3), 293-299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-012-0054-9</p><p></p><p>Murni, D., Helma, & Mirna. (2019). Validity and practicality of calculus teaching</p><p>materials based on integrated ict contextual problems to improve students</p><p>problem solving skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1317, 012131.</p><p>https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1317/1/012131</p><p></p><p>Muzangwa, J., & Chifamba, P. (2012). Analysis of error and misconceptions in the</p><p>learning of Calculus by undergraduate students. Acta Didactica Napocensia,</p><p>5(2).</p><p></p><p>Nardo, M. T. B. (2017). Modular instruction enhances learner autonomy. American</p><p>Journal of Educational Research, 5(10), 1024-1034.</p><p></p><p>Nasibah, U. I. M. & Nazipah.(2015). Model ADDIE dalam proses rekabentuk modul</p><p>pengajaran Bahasa Arab tujuan khas di USM sebagai contoh.</p><p></p><p>Ndlazi, N. J. (2015). First-year engineering students' concept development of integral</p><p>calculus at a South African university of technology (Doctoral dissertation).</p><p></p><p>Nik Azis Nik Pa. (2014). Pengembangan Nilai Dalam Pendidikan Matematik dan</p><p>Sains. Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Malaya.</p><p></p><p>Norah. M. N., Nurul I. H., & Radhiah. A. R. (2013). "The framework for learning using</p><p>video based on cognitive load theory among visual learners," 2013 IEEE 5th</p><p>Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED), Kuala Lumpur, pp. 15-20, doi:</p><p>10.1109/ICEED.2013.6908295.</p><p></p><p>Norazman, A., Sazelli, A. G., & Firdaus, M. H. (2014, June). Teaching calculus using</p><p>module based on cooperative learning strategy. In AIP Conference</p><p>Proceedings (Vol. 1602, No. 1, pp. 497-501). American Institute of Physics.</p><p></p><p>Nor Jannah, H., & Norshidah, M. S. (2017). Development and Assessment of the</p><p>Usability of Mathematical Teaching Module for Visually Impaired Fourth Year</p><p>Students. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counselling,</p><p>2(5), 54-69.</p><p></p><p>Nooriza, K., & Effandi, Z. (2015). Integrasi kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi dalam</p><p>pengajaran dan pembelajaran matematik: Analisis keperluan guru.[Integrating</p><p>high-level thinking skills in teaching and learning mathematics: An analysis of</p><p>teacher needs]. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematik, 3(1), 1-12.</p><p></p><p>Nugent, W., Sieppert, J., & Hudson, W. (2001). Practice evaluation fot the 21st century.</p><p>Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole</p><p></p><p>Nur Liyana, M. I., Aziz, M. S. M. A., & Nasir, M. B. (2014). Analisis Kesahan Kandungan</p><p>Modul Penyesuaian Pemikiran Kerjaya (PPK) Berdasarkan Pendekatan Teori</p><p>Cognitive Information Processing (CIP). JPBU Vol. 7</p><p></p><p>Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: are you sure you know</p><p>what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in nursing &</p><p>health, 29(5), 489-497.</p><p></p><p>Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Owen, S. V. (2007). Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of</p><p>content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in nursing &</p><p>health, 30(4), 459-467.</p><p></p><p>Pramuditya, S. A., Sulaiman, H. & Wahyudin. (2019) Development of instructional</p><p>media game education on integral and differential calculus. In Journal of</p><p>Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1280, No. 4, p. 042049). IOP Publishing.</p><p></p><p>Prendergast, M., Spassiani, N. A., & Roche, J. (2017). Developing a Mathematics</p><p>Module for Students with Intellectual Disability in Higher Education.</p><p>International Journal of Higher Education, 6(3), 169.</p><p>https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v6n3p169</p><p></p><p>Rabiatul, A. A., & Rohani, A. T. (2015). Pre-University Studentsdifficulties In Problem</p><p>Solving By Using Q-Methodology (1-11). Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan</p><p>Matematik Malaysia, 5(2), 1-11.</p><p></p><p>Radmehr, F., & Drake, M. (2017). Revised Blooms taxonomy and integral calculus:</p><p>unpacking the knowledge dimension. International Journal of Mathematical</p><p>Education in Science and Technology, 48(8), 12061224.</p><p>https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739x.2017.1321796</p><p></p><p>Radmehr, F., & Drake, M. (2018). Students mathematical performance, metacognitive</p><p>experiences and metacognitive skills in relation to integral-area relationships.</p><p>Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications: An International Journal of the</p><p>IMA, 38(2), 85106. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hry006</p><p></p><p>Ramadhana, R., & Hadi, A. (2018). Pengembangan modul pembelajaran Matematika</p><p>Berbasis Learning Cycle 7E dengan pendekatan saintifik. Equals, 1(1), 45-52.</p><p></p><p>Razali, N., Othman, H., Zainuri, N. A., Hamzah, F. M., Asshaari, I., Ariff, F. H. M. &</p><p>Nopiah, Z. M. (2016). Modern or Traditional Teaching Strategy In Learning</p><p>Engineering Mathematics Course. Journal of Engineering Science and</p><p>Technology Special Issue on PEKA 2016, November (2016) 13 - 20</p><p></p><p>Reddy, L. (2018). Unit-5 Designing Self-Learning Materials. IGNOU.</p><p></p><p>Richland, L.E., Stigler, J.W., & Holyoak, K.J. (2012). Teaching the conceptual structure</p><p>of mathematics. Educational Psychologist, 47(3), 189-203.</p><p>https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.667065</p><p></p><p>Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2005). Developmental research methods: Creating</p><p>knowledge from instructional design and development practice. Journal of</p><p>Computing in Higher Education, 16(2), 2338.</p><p>https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02961473</p><p></p><p>Richey, R.C., & Klein, J.D. (2007). Design and developmental research. New York, NY</p><p>: Routledge.</p><p></p><p>Rittle-Johnson, B., & Schneider, M. (2015). Developing conceptual and procedural</p><p>knowledge in mathematics. In R. Cohen Kadosh & A. Dowker (Eds.), Oxford</p><p>handbook of numerical cognition (pp. 1102-1118). Oxford, UK: Oxford</p><p>University Press. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199642342.013.014</p><p></p><p>Rossett, A. (1987). Training needs assessment. Educational Technology.</p><p></p><p>Russell, J. D. (1974). Modular Instruction. Minneapolis, Minn.: Burgest Publishing Co.</p><p></p><p>Sadiq, S. & Zamir, S. (2014). Effectiveness of Modular Approach in teaching at</p><p>University level. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(17), 103-110.</p><p></p><p>Salazar, D. A. (2014). Salazars Grouping Method: Effects on Students Achievement</p><p>in Integral Calculus. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(15), 119-126.</p><p></p><p>Sahin, A., Cavlazoglu, B., & Zeytuncu, Y.E. (2015). Flipping a college calculus course:</p><p>A Case study. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(3), 142.</p><p>Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.18.3.142</p><p></p><p>Santia, I. 2017. The Development of Mathematics Module Based On Relational</p><p>Thinking. Education Emission of FKIP University of Jember. Vol. 6, Issue 4, pp</p><p>49-58.</p><p></p><p>Sari, D. P., & Surya, E. (2017). Development the module of mathematics statistics1 by</p><p>using the model of dick and carey design. International journal of sciences:</p><p>basic and applied research (IJSBAR), 34(1).</p><p></p><p>Sattar, M. R., Rose, A. A. R., Haryanti, M. A., & Azlin, N. M. (2017). Using QR-Code</p><p>in a green technology module to foster motivation and independent learning.</p><p>International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 22(2), 177.</p><p>https://doi.org/10.1504/ijil.2017.10006918</p><p></p><p>Sazilah, S., & Faizal, N. L. A. (2017). Development and evaluation of form three</p><p>mathematics i-Think module (Mi-T3) on algebraic formulae topic. In AIP</p><p>Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1847, No. 1, p. 030017). AIP Publishing LLC.</p><p></p><p>Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories an educational perspective sixth edition.</p><p>Pearson.</p><p></p><p>Seah, E. K. (2005). Analysis of students difficulties in solving integration</p><p>problems. The Mathematics Educator, 9(1), 39-59.</p><p></p><p>Sealey, V. (2014) A framework for characterizing student understanding of Riemann</p><p>sums and definite integrals. J. Math. Behav., 33, 230245.</p><p></p><p>Seel, N. M., Lehmann, T., Blumschein, P., & Podolskiy, O. A. (2017). Instructional</p><p>Design for Learning: Theoretical Foundations. SensePublishers.</p><p></p><p>Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research Methods For Business: A Skill Building</p><p>Approach (7th ed.). Wiley.</p><p></p><p>Sevimli, E. (2016). Do calculus students demand technology integration into learning</p><p>environment? case of instructional differences. International Journal of</p><p>Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(1), 37.</p><p>https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0038-6</p><p></p><p>Shaheen, S and Khatoon, S. (2017). Impact of ICT Enriched Modular Approach on</p><p>Academic Achievement of Biology Students. Journal of Research and</p><p>Reflections in Education, Vol 11(1), 49-59.</p><p></p><p>Shelton, T. (2016). Injecting Inquiry-Oriented Modules into Calculus. PRIMUS, 27(7),</p><p>669680. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2016.1211205</p><p></p><p>Shephard, K. (2003). Questioning, promoting and evaluating the use of streaming</p><p>video to support student learning. British Journal of Educational</p><p>Technology, 34(3), 295-308.</p><p></p><p>Shodikin, A., & Novianti, A. (2017). Design of Animated Subject Materials in Integral</p><p>Calculus Course. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 6(3), 294-298.</p><p></p><p>Sholihah, U., & Maryono, M. (2020). Students visual thinking ability in solving the</p><p>integral problem. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in</p><p>Mathematics Education), 5(2), 175186.</p><p>https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v5i2.10286</p><p></p><p>Sidek, M. N., & Jamaludin, A. (2008). Pembangunan Modul Bagaimana Membina</p><p>Modul Latihan dan Modul Akademik (Vol. 2). Penerbit Universiti Putra</p><p>Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Skemp, R. R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding.</p><p>Mathematics Teaching 77, 20 26.</p><p></p><p>Skemp, R. R. (2006). Relational understanding and instrumental</p><p>understanding. Mathematics teaching in the middle school, 12(2), 88-95.</p><p></p><p>Schindler, P. S., & Cooper, D. R. (2006). Marketing research. Tata McGraw-Hill</p><p>Education.</p><p></p><p>Suastika, I. K., & Wahyuningtyas, D. T. (2020). Inquiry-based E-module for Geometry</p><p>Learning Subject. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(1), 243248.</p><p>https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080130</p><p></p><p>Suastika, I K., Triwahyuningtyas, D. (2016). The Importance of Developing Learning</p><p>Module of Numbers in Primary Schools. Proceedings: National Seminar on</p><p>"Building Lecturers Character as a Researcher and a Devotee in Entering the</p><p>Global Competition".Malang August 6th, 2016 at the University of Malang</p><p>Kanjuruhan</p><p></p><p>umonja, S., Velikovi, V., & ubarevi, T. (2015). Applying ICT in the teaching of</p><p>mathematics in high school. IMVI Open Mathematical Education Notes, 5(1),</p><p>31-46. Available at: http://oaji.net/articles/2015/484-1423741289.pdf</p><p></p><p>Sunismi, S., & Fathani, A. H. (2018). Pengembangan E-Module Kalkulus I Sebagai</p><p>Panduan Mahasiswa Untuk Mengoptimalkan Individual Learning. JPM : Jurnal</p><p>Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2), 192. https://doi.org/10.33474/jpm.v1i2.820</p><p></p><p>Suryani, A. I., Anwar, Hajidin, & Rofiki, I. (2020). The practicality of mathematics</p><p>learning module on triangles using GeoGebra. Journal of Physics: Conference</p><p>Series, 1470, 012079. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1470/1/012079</p><p></p><p>Suryanto (2014). Kesalahan pemahaman konsep Matematik dan pengaruhnya</p><p>terhadap kegagalan belajar. Articel of education, Vocasional Education</p><p>Developement Center Malang, 315.</p><p></p><p>Syahrir, S., Syazali, M., Masykur, R., Amrulloh, M. A., Sada, H. J., & Listiani, B. (2018).</p><p>Calculus Module for Derivative Application Materials with an Islamic Contextual</p><p>Teaching and Learning Approach. IOP Conference Series: Journal of Physics,</p><p>1155. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1155/1/012079</p><p></p><p>Syamsulaini, S., & Mashitoh, H. (2016). Pengajaran berasaskan video dalam</p><p>pembelajaran berpusatkan pelajar: analisis dan kajian kritikal. Journal of ICT in</p><p>Education, 3, 24-33.</p><p></p><p>Talwanga, M. (2014). Transition between Secondary and University Mathematics.</p><p>Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(23), 2219-2219.</p><p></p><p>Tasman, F., & Ahmad, D. (2018). Visualizing Volume to Help Students Understand the</p><p>Disk Method on Calculus Integral Course. IOP Conference Series: Materials</p><p>Science and Engineering, 335, 012112. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-</p><p>899x/335/1/012112</p><p></p><p>Tinsley, H. E., & Weiss, D. J. (1975). Interrater reliability and agreement of subjective</p><p>judgments. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 22(4), 358.</p><p></p><p>Tin, A. C., & Wah, L. L. (2017). Instrumen Penilaian Kualiti Untuk Modul Pengajaran:</p><p>Pengujian Ciri Psikometrik. JuKu: Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia</p><p>Pasifik, 4(4), 25-43.</p><p></p><p>Ulhusna, M., Diana Putri, S., & Zakirman. (2019). Validity of integrated calculus module</p><p>two stay two stray learning model for use in communities independent learning</p><p>groups. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 314,</p><p>012061. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/314/1/012061</p><p></p><p>Vandenbussche, J., Ritter, L., & Scherrer, C. (2018). An incentivized early remediation</p><p>program in Calculus I. International Journal of Mathematical Education in</p><p>Science and Technology, 49(8), 12351249.</p><p>https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739x.2018.1458340</p><p></p><p>Vasanti, G., & Vinod Kumar, V. (2016). Harnessing the Power of Active Learning based</p><p>Engineering Mathematics Module. Indian Journal of Science and Technology,</p><p>9(40), 40. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i40/102964</p><p></p><p>Vijayaragavan, K., Singh, P., Wason, M., & Sangeetha, V. (2018). Self-Learning</p><p>Modules for Enhancing the Efficiency of Extension Personnel. Journal of Global</p><p>Communication, 11(2), 119. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-2442.2018.00015.0</p><p></p><p>Voon, L. L., Julaihi, N. H., & Tang, H. E. (2017). Misconceptions and errors in learning</p><p>integral calculus. Asian Journal of University Education AJUE), 13(1), 17-39.</p><p></p><p>Wade, Carol H.; Sonnert, Gerhard; Sadler, Philip M.; Hazari, Zahra; and Watson,</p><p>Cherrie, "Acomparison of Mathematics Teachers' and Professors' Views on</p><p>Secondary Preparation for Tertiary Calculus" (2016). Education and Human</p><p>Development Faculty Publications. 27</p><p></p><p>Wewe, M. (2020). The Profile of Students Learning Difficulties in Concepts Mastery in</p><p>Calculus Course. Desimal: Jurnal Matematika, 3(2), 161168.</p><p>https://doi.org/10.24042/djm.v3i2.6421</p><p></p><p>Widodo, A. (2005). Taksonomi Tujuan Pembelajaran. Didaktis. 4(2), 61-69.</p><p></p><p>Widyastuti, E., & Susiana. (2019). Using the ADDIE model to develop learning material</p><p>for actuarial mathematics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1188,</p><p>012052. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1188/1/012052</p><p></p><p>Wilson, L. O. (2016). Anderson and KrathwohlBlooms taxonomy</p><p>revised. Understanding the New Version of Bloom's Taxonomy.</p><p></p><p>Yap, W. L., Neo, M., & Neo, T. K. (2016). The impact of the role of teacher and balance</p><p>of power in transforming conventional teaching to learner-centered teaching in</p><p>Malaysian institution of higher education. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences</p><p>and Humanities, 24(4), 18491868</p><p></p><p>Yulastri, A., Hidayat, H., Ganefri, G., Edya, F., & Islami, S. (2018). Learning outcomes</p><p>with the application of product based entrepreneurship module in vocational</p><p>higher education. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 8(2), 120-131.</p><p></p><p>Yusni, Y. M., Melati, S., Fatanah, M., Shahriza, S., Ibrahim, M. K. A., & Ridhuan, M.</p><p>M. J. (2018). The needs analysis in self-concept module development. MOJES:</p><p>Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(1), 44-55.</p><p></p><p>Zulkefly, M., Othman, L., & Shahrizal, S. (2017). Pembinaan dan Penilaian Instrumen</p><p>Ujian Aptitud Kemasukan ke Institut Pengajian Tinggi Malaysia. Journal of</p><p>Science and Mathematics Letters, 5, 16-27.</p><p>https://doi.org/10.37134/jsml.vol5.2.2017</p><p></p> |