Using Facebook in learning literature among lower secondary school ESL students
<p>Facebook as one of the social networking sites has captured the attention of educators and</p><p>policy-makers as an alternative tool for language teaching and learning. The use of</p><p>Facebook made the teaching and learning...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | thesis |
Language: | eng |
Published: |
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=7241 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:7241 |
---|---|
record_format |
uketd_dc |
institution |
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
collection |
UPSI Digital Repository |
language |
eng |
topic |
LB Theory and practice of education |
spellingShingle |
LB Theory and practice of education Logenthini Mariappan Using Facebook in learning literature among lower secondary school ESL students |
description |
<p>Facebook as one of the social networking sites has captured the attention of educators and</p><p>policy-makers as an alternative tool for language teaching and learning. The use of</p><p>Facebook made the teaching and learning process interesting for the students and had</p><p>given the students an opportunity to better understand novels. The objectives of the study</p><p>were to explore the use of Facebook in learning literature among lower secondary school</p><p>ESL students and to investigate their perception during the learning process. The study</p><p>employed both quantitative and qualitative approaches to research. This study had two</p><p>phases of investigation. The first phase involved survey-questionnaires. Meanwhile, the</p><p>second phase involved conducting a quasi-experiment and semi-structured interviews.</p><p>The subjects employed for the study were 60 lower secondary ESL school students using</p><p>purposive sampling method. The subjects, were then divided equally for the treatment</p><p>and control groups. The findings indicated that Facebook could be an effective tool in</p><p>learning a novel. The results concluded that the students could use Facebook to help them</p><p>understand a novel better. The results of the study implied that the use of Facebook is a</p><p>beneficial literature-learning tool for lower secondary ESL students.</p> |
format |
thesis |
qualification_name |
|
qualification_level |
Doctorate |
author |
Logenthini Mariappan |
author_facet |
Logenthini Mariappan |
author_sort |
Logenthini Mariappan |
title |
Using Facebook in learning literature among lower secondary school ESL students |
title_short |
Using Facebook in learning literature among lower secondary school ESL students |
title_full |
Using Facebook in learning literature among lower secondary school ESL students |
title_fullStr |
Using Facebook in learning literature among lower secondary school ESL students |
title_full_unstemmed |
Using Facebook in learning literature among lower secondary school ESL students |
title_sort |
using facebook in learning literature among lower secondary school esl students |
granting_institution |
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
granting_department |
Fakulti Bahasa dan Komunikasi |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=7241 |
_version_ |
1747833369235816448 |
spelling |
oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:72412022-07-13 Using Facebook in learning literature among lower secondary school ESL students 2021 Logenthini Mariappan LB Theory and practice of education <p>Facebook as one of the social networking sites has captured the attention of educators and</p><p>policy-makers as an alternative tool for language teaching and learning. The use of</p><p>Facebook made the teaching and learning process interesting for the students and had</p><p>given the students an opportunity to better understand novels. The objectives of the study</p><p>were to explore the use of Facebook in learning literature among lower secondary school</p><p>ESL students and to investigate their perception during the learning process. The study</p><p>employed both quantitative and qualitative approaches to research. This study had two</p><p>phases of investigation. The first phase involved survey-questionnaires. Meanwhile, the</p><p>second phase involved conducting a quasi-experiment and semi-structured interviews.</p><p>The subjects employed for the study were 60 lower secondary ESL school students using</p><p>purposive sampling method. The subjects, were then divided equally for the treatment</p><p>and control groups. The findings indicated that Facebook could be an effective tool in</p><p>learning a novel. The results concluded that the students could use Facebook to help them</p><p>understand a novel better. The results of the study implied that the use of Facebook is a</p><p>beneficial literature-learning tool for lower secondary ESL students.</p> 2021 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=7241 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=7241 text eng closedAccess Doctoral Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Bahasa dan Komunikasi <p>Abraham, R. G., & Liou, H. C. (1991). Interaction generated by three computer</p><p>programs: analysis of functions of spoken language. Computer-assisted language</p><p>learning and testing: research issues and practice, 85-109.</p><p></p><p>Ajjan, H., & Hartshorne, R. (2008). Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0</p><p>technologies: Theory and empirical tests. The internet and higher</p><p>education, 11(2), 71-80.</p><p></p><p>Alias, N., Siraj, S., Daud, M. K. A. M., & Hussin, Z. (2013). Effectiveness of Facebook</p><p>based learning to enhance creativity among Islamic studies students by employing</p><p>isman instructional design model. Turkish Online Journal of Educational</p><p>Technology, 12(1), 60-67</p><p></p><p>Amanda, M. (2016, March 27). What Does ESL Mean? Learning English Is Important to</p><p>Every ESL Student. Retrieved from https://www.verywell.com on 13/11/2017.</p><p></p><p>Anderson, J. R. (2005). Cognitive psychology and its implications. New York: Macmillan</p><p></p><p>Anderson, R. C. (1984). Role of the readers schema in comprehension, learning, and</p><p>memory. Learning to read in American schools: Basal readers and content</p><p>texts, 29, 243-257.</p><p></p><p>Annetta, L. A., Minogue, J., Holmes, S. Y., & Cheng, M. T. (2009). Investigating the</p><p>impact of video games on high school students engagement and learning about</p><p>genetics. Computers & Education, 53(1), 74-85.</p><p></p><p>Ariogul, S. (2001). The teaching of reading through short stories in advanced</p><p>classes. Unpublished MA Thesis. Ankara: Hacettepe University.</p><p></p><p>Armstrong, J. & Franklin, T. (2008): A review of current and developing international</p><p>practice in the use of social networking in higher education. Retrieved from</p><p>http://franklin-consulting.co.uk/LinkedDocuments/the use of social networking in</p><p>HE.pdf on 22 March 2017.</p><p></p><p>Askew, M., Brown, M., Rhodes, V., Johnson, D., & Wiliam, D. (1997). Effective</p><p>teachers of numeracy. London: Kings College.</p><p></p><p>Asmah, H. O. (1987). English in Malaysia: A typology of its status and role.</p><p>In Conference on Language Planning in a Multilingual Setting: The Role of</p><p>English. National University, Singapore.</p><p></p><p>Astin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher</p><p>education. Journal of college student personnel, 25(4), 297-308.</p><p></p><p>Atherton J S (2013) Learning and Teaching; Learning and teaching system [On-line:</p><p>UK] retrieved 23 December 2017 from http://www.learningandteaching.info.</p><p></p><p>Augustsson, G. (2010). Web 2.0, pedagogical support for reflexive and emotional social</p><p>interaction among Swedish students. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4),</p><p>197-205.</p><p></p><p>Awodele, O., Idowu, S., Anjorin, O., Adedire, A., & Akpore, V. (2009). University</p><p>enhancement system using a social networking approach: extending elearning.</p><p>Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 6(1), 269-83.</p><p></p><p>Babbie, E. (2010). The practice of social research. Belmont, California: Wadsworth</p><p>Cengage Learning.</p><p></p><p>Baker, T.L. and A.J. Risley (1994) Doing Social Research. New York: McGraw-Hill.</p><p></p><p>Bartlett, F. C. (1958). Thinking. An experimental and social study, New York.</p><p></p><p>Bernard, H. R. (2002). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative</p><p>approaches (3rd ed.). Walnut Creek, California: Alta Mira Press.</p><p></p><p>Bicen, H., & Uzunboylu, H. (2013). The Use of Social Networking Sites in Education : A</p><p>Case Study of Facebook, Journal of Universal Computer Science, 19(5), 658</p><p>671,</p><p></p><p>Blattner, G., & Fiori, M. (2009). Facebook in the language classroom: Promises and</p><p>possibilities. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance</p><p>Learning, 6(1), 17-28.</p><p></p><p>Bognar, L. (1993). Matijevic M. Didaktika, kolska knjiga, Zagreb.</p><p></p><p>Boulos, M. N. K., Maramba, I., & Wheeler, S. (2006). Wikis, blogs and podcasts: a new</p><p>generation of Web-based tools for virtual collaborative clinical practice and</p><p>education. BMC medical education, 6(1), 41.</p><p></p><p>Bowling, A. (1997). Research Methods in Health: Investigating health and health</p><p>services. Buckingham. Open University Press.</p><p></p><p>Boyd, D. (2007). Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics</p><p>in teenage social life. MacArthur foundation series on digital learningYouth,</p><p>identity, and digital media volume, 119-142.</p><p></p><p>Boyd, d. m. and Ellison, N. B. (2007), Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and</p><p>Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13: 210230.</p><p>doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x.</p><p></p><p>Brewer, J., & Hunter, A. (1989). Multimethod research: a synthesis of styles. Sage</p><p>Publications, Inc.</p><p></p><p>Bruning, R., Schraw, G., Norby, M., & Ronning, R. (2004). Cognitive psychology and</p><p>instruction (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Merrill/Prentice Hall.</p><p></p><p>Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2015). Business Research Methods. Oxford: OUP Oxford.</p><p></p><p>Buckley, S., Hasen, G., & Ainley, M. (2004). Affective engagement: A person-centred</p><p>approach to understanding the structure of subjective learning</p><p>experiences. Australian Association for Research in Education, Melbourne:</p><p>Australia.</p><p></p><p>Bulger, R. E. (2002). Research with human beings. The Ethical Dimensions of the</p><p>Biological and Health Sciences, 117-125.</p><p></p><p>Burke, S. C., Snyder, S., & Rager, R. C. (2009). An assessment of faculty usage of</p><p>YouTube as a teaching resource. Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and</p><p>Practice, 7(1), 8.</p><p></p><p>Burns, N., & Grove, S. K. (1997). The practice of nursing research: Conduct, critique &</p><p>utilization. Philadelphia: Saunders.</p><p></p><p>Carroli, P. (2002). Perceptions of Literature: A Comparison of Students and Educators</p><p>Views. In Proceedings of Innovations in Italian teaching workshop (pp. 113-128).</p><p></p><p>Carter, R. A., & Long, M. N. (1991). Teaching literature. Essex: Addison Wesley</p><p>Longman Limited.</p><p></p><p>Celce-Murcia, M., & McIntosh, L. (1991). Teaching English as a second or foreign</p><p>language. Rowley, Massachusetts: Newbury House.</p><p></p><p>Chapelle, C. (2003). English language learning and technology: Lectures on applied</p><p>linguistics in the age of information and communication technology (Vol. 7). John</p><p>Benjamins Publishing.</p><p></p><p>Chen, P. S. D., Lambert, A. D., & Guidry, K. R. (2010). Engaging online learners: The</p><p>impact of Web-based learning technology on college student</p><p>engagement. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1222-1232.</p><p></p><p>Chen, B., & Bryer, T. (2012). Investigating instructional strategies for using social media</p><p>in formal and informal learning. The International Review of Research in Open</p><p>and Distributed Learning, 13(1), 87-104.</p><p></p><p>Crook, C., Fisher, T., Graber, R., Harrison, C., Lewin, C., Cummings, J., & Sharples, M.</p><p>(2008). Implementing Web 2.0 in secondary schools: Impacts, barriers and issues.</p><p></p><p>Coates, H. (2006). Student engagement in campus-based and online education:</p><p>University connections. Routledge. New York.</p><p></p><p>Cohen, D. K., & Hill, H. C. (1998). Instructional policy and classroom performance: The</p><p>mathematics reform in California. Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research</p><p>in Education.</p><p></p><p>Collie, J., & Slater, S. (1987). Literature in the Language Classroom: A Resource Book</p><p>of Ideas and Activities. Cambridge University Press.</p><p></p><p>Cohen, L. & Manion, L. (1994) Research Methods in Education (fourth edition). London:</p><p>Routledge</p><p></p><p>Cooper, J. (2006). Literacy: Helping children construct meaning (6th ed.). New York:</p><p>Houghton Mifflin Company</p><p></p><p>Creswell, J. W. (2009). Editorial: Mapping the field of mixed methods research. Sage</p><p>publications.</p><p></p><p>Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five</p><p>approaches. Sage publications.</p><p></p><p>Dale, C., & Pymm, J. M. (2009). Podagogy The iPod as a learning technology. Active</p><p>Learning in Higher Education, 10(1), 84-96.</p><p></p><p>Darmi, R., & Albion, P. (2013, July). English language in the Malaysian education</p><p>system: its existence and implications. In THIRD MALAYSIAN POSTGRADUATE</p><p>CONFERENCE (MPC) 2013 (p. 175).</p><p></p><p>Delanoy, W. (1997). Teacher mediation and literature learning in the language</p><p>classroom. IATEFL Literature and Culture Special Interest Group Newsletter, 14,</p><p>1-9.</p><p></p><p>Dhillon, K. K., &Mogan, S. (2017). Language-based approaches to understanding</p><p>literature : A creative activity module. The English Teacher, (2), 16.</p><p></p><p>Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook friends:</p><p>Social capital and college students use of online social network sites. Journal of</p><p>Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143-1168.</p><p></p><p>Erjavec, K. (2013). Informal learning through Facebook among Slovenian pupils.</p><p>Comunicar, 21(41), 117-126.</p><p></p><p>ESL. (2016). In Urban Dictionary Online. Retrieved on 15/7/207 from</p><p>http://www.urbandictionary.com.</p><p></p><p>E. Qualman. (2009). Socialnomics: How Social Media Transforms the Way We Live and</p><p>Do Business. Adapted by permission of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ISBN: 978-0-</p><p>470-47723-6. [Online]. Available:</p><p>http://www.ebscohost.com/uploads/corpLearn/pdf/bbs_socialnomics.pdf</p><p></p><p>Facebook, (2013). Key facts. Facebook. http:// http://newsroom.fb.com/company-info.</p><p>Retrieved on 30/7/2017.</p><p></p><p>Freeman W (2014), Taming social media in higher education classrooms. In: Proceedings</p><p>for the 9th international conference on networked learning, pp 359363.</p><p></p><p>Gagne, E. D., Yekovich, C. W., & Yekovich, F. R. (1993). The cognitive psychology of</p><p>school learning. Allyn & Bacon.</p><p></p><p>Garrison, D. R., & Akyol, Z. (2009). Role of Instructional Technology in The</p><p>Transformation of Higher Education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education,</p><p>21, 19-30.</p><p></p><p>Gaston, J. (2006). Reaching and teaching the digital natives. Library Hi Tech</p><p>News, 23(3), 12-13.</p><p></p><p>Ghani, M. B. (2015). Using Facebook in Teaching and Learning English. In The</p><p>International Conference on Language, Literature, Culture and Education (pp.</p><p>25-26).</p><p></p><p>Gonzales-Bueno, M., & Perez, L. (2000). Electronic mail in foreign language writing: A</p><p>study of grammatical and lexical accuracy and quantity of language. Foreign</p><p>Language Annals, 33, 189-197.</p><p></p><p>Griffith, S., & Liyanage, L. (2008). An introduction to the potential of social networking</p><p>sites in education, In: Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Second</p><p>Emerging Technologies Conference 2008. Australia: Wollongong.</p><p></p><p>Gubrium, J. F., & Holstein, J. A. (2001). Handbook of interview research: Context and</p><p>method. Sage.</p><p></p><p>Guskey, T. R. (1988). Teacher efficacy, self-concept, and attitudes toward the</p><p>implementation of instructional innovation. Teaching and teacher education, 4(1),</p><p>63-69.</p><p></p><p>Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data</p><p>analysis (5th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.</p><p></p><p>Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate Data</p><p>Analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall. JOUR.</p><p></p><p>Hall, R., & Hall, M. (2010). Scoping the pedagogic relationship between self-efficacy</p><p>and Web 2.0 technologies. Learning, Media and Technology, 35(3), 255-273.</p><p></p><p>Hamid, S., Kurnia, S., Waycott, J., & Chang, S. (2011). Exploring Malaysian students'</p><p>perspectives of Online Social Networking (OSN) use for higher education.</p><p>In 22nd Annual Conference ISANA International Education Association (ISANA)</p><p>2011, Hobart, Tasmania</p><p></p><p>Hamid, S., Waycott, J., Chang, S., & Kurnia, S. (2011). Appropriating online social</p><p>networking (OSN) activities for higher education: Two Malaysian</p><p>cases. Changing Demands, Changing Directions. Proceedings ascilite Hobart,</p><p>526-538.</p><p></p><p>Haythornthwaite, C. (2005). Social network methods and measures for examining elearning.</p><p>Social networks, 2005, 1-22.</p><p></p><p>Hedge, T. (2001). Teaching and learning in the language classroom (Vol. 106). Oxford,,</p><p>UK: Oxford University Press.</p><p></p><p>Heiberger, G., & Harper, R. (2008). Have you Facebooked Astin lately? Using</p><p>technology to increase student involvement. New directions for student</p><p>services, 2008(124), 19-35.</p><p></p><p>Hewitt, A., & Forte, A. (2006). Crossing boundaries: Identity management and</p><p>student/faculty relationships on the Facebook. Poster presented at CSCW, Banff,</p><p>Alberta, 1-2.</p><p></p><p>Higgins, S., & Moseley, D. (2001). Teachers' thinking about information and</p><p>communications technology and learning: Beliefs and outcomes. Teacher</p><p>development, 5(2), 191-210.</p><p></p><p>Higher Education Research Institute (2007) College freshmen and online social</p><p>networking sites. Available at: http://www.gseis.ucla.edu (last accessed 7 March</p><p>2017).</p><p></p><p>Hirst, P. H., & Peters, R. S. (1970). The logic of education (Vol. 25). London: Routledge</p><p>& Kegan Paul.</p><p></p><p>Holmes, M., & Bloxham, M. (2007). An observational method for time use research:</p><p>Advantages, disadvantages and lessons learned from the Middletown media</p><p>studies. Conference of the International Association of Time Use Researchers.</p><p>Washington, D.C.</p><p></p><p>Huang, S.J. & Liu, H.F. (2000). Communicative Language Teaching in a Multimedia</p><p>Language Lab. The Internet TESL Journal, 6(2). Retrieved Jan 23, 2018, from</p><p>http://iteslj.org/Articles/Lee-CALLbarriers.html.</p><p></p><p>Hughes, J., & Tolley, S. (2010). Engaging students through new literacies: The good, bad</p><p>and curriculum of visual essays. English in Education, 44(1), 5-26.</p><p></p><p>Hull, K. (2014). Using Facebook in the classroom. International Journal of Social Media</p><p>and Interactive Learning Environments, 2(1), 60-69.</p><p></p><p>Jones, N., Blackey, H., Fitzgibbon, K., & Chew, E. (2010). Get out of</p><p>MySpace!. Computers & Education, 54(3), 776-782.</p><p></p><p>Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and</p><p>opportunities of Social Media. Business horizons, 53(1), 59-68.</p><p></p><p>Karl, K. A., & Peluchette, J. V. (2011). Friending professors, parents and bosses: A</p><p>Facebook connection conundrum. Journal of Education for Business, 86(4), 214-</p><p>222.</p><p></p><p>Kearsley, G., & Shneiderman, B. (1998). Engagement theory: A framework for</p><p>technology-based teaching and learning. Educational technology, 38(5), 20-23.</p><p></p><p>Keengwe, J., & Kidd, T. T. (2010). Towards best practices in online learning and</p><p>teaching in higher education. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(2),</p><p>533.</p><p></p><p>Kelner, L. B. (1993). The Creative Classroom: A Guide for Using Creative Drama in the</p><p>Classroom, PreK-6. Heinemann, 361 Hanover St., Portsmouth, NH 03801-3912..</p><p></p><p>Kementerian Pelajaran (1964) 'Pusat Pengajaran Pandang Dengar (A.V.A) untuk sekolah</p><p>sekolah kebangsaan', Kuala Lumpur.</p><p></p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (2010). 2011 Primary English language</p><p>curriculum.Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum: Kementerian Pelajaran</p><p>Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Kennedy, G., Judd, T., Dalgarno, B., & Waycott, J. (2010). Beyond natives and</p><p>immigrants: exploring types of net generation students. Journal of Computer</p><p>Assisted Learning, 26(5), 332-343.</p><p></p><p>Kirschner, P.A. (2002). Can we support CSCL? Educational, social and technological</p><p>affordances for learning. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL: Can we</p><p>support CSCL? (pp. 7-47). Heerlen, The Netherlands: Open University of the</p><p>Netherlands.</p><p></p><p>Kleiner, A. (2002). Karen Stephenson's quantum theory of trust. Strategy and Business,</p><p>54-54.</p><p></p><p>Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential education: Experience as the source of learning and</p><p>development. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.</p><p></p><p>Kundu, Arnab. (2018). A Study on Indian Teachers Roles and Willingness to Accept</p><p>Educational Technology.</p><p></p><p>Kulik, J. A. (1994). Meta-analytic studies of findings on computer-based</p><p>instruction. Technology assessment in education and training, 1, 9-34.</p><p></p><p>Lantis, J. S. (2000). Teaching Introductory International Relations with Cases and</p><p>Analytical Exercises. The New International Studies Classroom: Active Teaching,</p><p>Active Learning, edited by JS Lantis, LM Kuzma and J. Boehrer. Boulder, CO:</p><p>Lynne Rienner Publishers.</p><p></p><p>Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The latent</p><p>semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of</p><p>knowledge. Psychological review, 104(2), 211.</p><p></p><p>Lazar, G. (1993). Literature and language teaching: a guide for teachers and trainers.</p><p>Cambridge University Press.</p><p></p><p>Lazar, G. (2008). Literature and language teaching: A guide for teachers and trainers.</p><p>Ernst Klett Sprachen.</p><p></p><p>Lee, L. (2003). Perspectives of nonnative speakers of Spanish on two types of online</p><p>collaborative exchanges: Promises and challenges. In L. Lomicka & J.</p><p>CookePlagwitz (Eds.), Teaching with technology (pp. 221-248). Boston: Thomson</p><p>& Heinle.</p><p></p><p>Lenhart, A., Purcell, K., Smith, A., & Zickuhr, K. (2010). Social Media & Mobile</p><p>Internet Use among Teens and Young Adults. Millennials. Pew internet &</p><p>American life project.</p><p></p><p>Lewis, J. & Ritchie, J., (2003). Qualitative Research Practice: A guide for Social Science</p><p>Students and Researchers. Sage Publications.</p><p></p><p>Li, C. S., & Irby, B. (2008). An overview of online education: Attractiveness, benefits,</p><p>challenges, concerns and recommendations. College Student Journal, 42(2), 449.</p><p></p><p>Likert, R. 1932. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology,</p><p>Vol. 22, No. 140.</p><p></p><p>Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills.</p><p>Lowedahl, J.M. (2011). Hype cycle for higher education 2011. Gartner research report</p><p>(Retrieved from</p><p>http://www85.homepage.villanova.edu/timothy.ay/DIT2160/BYOD/hype_cycle_f</p><p>or_education_201_214466.pdf on 29/4/2017).</p><p></p><p>Lusk, B. (2010). Digital natives and social media behavior: an overview. The Prevention</p><p>Researcher, 17(S1), 3-7.</p><p></p><p>Lyons, C. (1983,). The Relationship of Prospective Teachers' Neural Processing,</p><p>Cognitive Style and Personality Type to Classroom Learning and Teaching</p><p>Behaviors. In Ohio Journal of Science (Vol. 83, No. 2, pp. 77-77).</p><p></p><p>Lytton, H. (1971). Observation studies of parent-child interaction: A methodological</p><p>review. Child Development, 651-684.</p><p></p><p>Madge, C., Meek, J., Wellens, J., & Hooley, T. (2009). Facebook, social integration and</p><p>informal learning at university:It is more for socialising and talking to friends</p><p>about work than for actually doing work. Learning, Media and</p><p>Technology, 34(2), 141-155.</p><p></p><p>Mahmood, A.H., & Rahman , A.R.. (2002). Teknik pengajaran sastera dalam Bahasa</p><p>Melayu. Jurnal Dewan Bahasa 25(6), 12-17.</p><p></p><p>Mariappan, L., Abu, A. G. B., & Omar, A. B. (2017). Facebooking for a More Lively</p><p>Interaction in Literature Classroom. Creative Education, 8(05), 749.</p><p></p><p>Marhan, A. M. (2006). Connectivism: Concepts and principles for emerging learning</p><p>networks. In The 1 st Conference on Virtual Learning.</p><p></p><p>Marshall, C. (1991). Teachers' learning styles: How they affect student learning. The</p><p>Clearing House, 64(4), 225-227.</p><p></p><p>Martinez, M., &Roser, N. L. (1991). Children's responses to literature. Handbook of</p><p>research on teaching the English language arts, 2. Macmillan. New York.</p><p></p><p>Massy, William (2002, May). Distance Education: Guidelines for Good Practice. AFT,</p><p>pp. 9, 16.</p><p></p><p>Mauzy, D. K. (1985). Language and language policy in Malaysia. Language policy and</p><p>national unity, 151-177.</p><p></p><p>Mazer, J. P., Murphy, R. E., & Simonds, C. J. (2009). The effects of teacher</p><p>self-disclosure via Facebook on teacher credibility. Learning, Media and</p><p>technology, 34(2), 175-183.</p><p></p><p>Mazer, J., Murphy, R. & Simonds, C. (2007). Ill see you on Facebook: The effects of</p><p>computer-mediated teacher self-disclosure on student motivation, affective</p><p>learning, and classroom climate. Communication Education, 56(1), 117.</p><p></p><p>Mazman, S.G. &Usluel, Y.K., (2010). Modeling educational usage of Facebook.</p><p>Computers and Education. 55, 444-453.</p><p></p><p>McKay, S. (1982). Literature in the ESL classroom. Tesol Quarterly, 529-536.</p><p></p><p>McKenzie, D. (1985). The extraction of magma from the crust and mantle. Earth and</p><p>Planetary Science Letters, 74(1), 81-91.</p><p></p><p>McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. (2007, December). Social software and participatory</p><p>learning: Pedagogical choices with technology affordances in the Web 2.0 era.</p><p>In ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings ascilite</p><p>Singapore 2007 (pp. 664-675).</p><p></p><p>McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. (2008). The three p's of pedagogy for the networked</p><p>society: Personalization, participation, and productivity. International Journal of</p><p>Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(1), 10-27.</p><p></p><p>McRae, J. (1991). Literature with a Small l. London & Basingstoke: Macmillan.</p><p></p><p>Mehdikhani, N. (1983). The relative effects of teacher teaching style, teacher learning</p><p>style, and student learning style upon student academic achievement (Doctoral</p><p>dissertation, Catholic University of America).</p><p></p><p>Mellon, C. A. (1999). Technology and the great pendulum of education. Journal of</p><p>Research on Computing in Education, 32(1), 28-35.</p><p></p><p>Menezes, H. (2012). Using Digital Storytelling to Improve Literacy Skills. International</p><p>Association for Development of the Information Society.</p><p></p><p>Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education.</p><p>Revised and Expanded from" Case Study Research in Education. Jossey-Bass</p><p>Publishers.</p><p></p><p>Mertler, C. A., & Reinhart, R. V. (2016). Advanced and multivariate statistical methods:</p><p>Practical application and interpretation. Routledge.</p><p></p><p>Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded</p><p>sourcebook. Sage Publications.</p><p></p><p>Minocha, S. (2008). A study on the effective use of social software by further and higher</p><p>education in the UK to support student learning and engagement. Bristol, UK:</p><p>Joint Information Systems Committee. Retrieved August 25, 2017, from</p><p>http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/projects/effective-use-of-social-softwarein-</p><p>education-finalreport.pdf.</p><p></p><p>Mitchell, R and Myles, F. (2004) Second Language Learning Theories, 2nd edition.</p><p>London: Arnold; New York, distributed by Oxford University Press (chapter 2).</p><p></p><p>Ministry of Education (1989) Curriculum Specifications for English Language Form</p><p>Four, Kuala Lumpur.</p><p></p><p>Nawi Ismail, (2004) Komsas & minat membaca pelajar. Pelita Bahasa. Disember, 6(12),</p><p>11-13.</p><p></p><p>Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory (2nd Edit.) McGraw-Hill. Hillsdale, New</p><p>Jersey.</p><p></p><p>Nunan, D. (1992). Research methods in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge</p><p>University Press.</p><p></p><p>Jamin, N. B. (1978). The development of educational media service in Malaysia, 1957-</p><p>1972 (Doctoral dissertation, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale).</p><p></p><p>ODonoghue, J., Singh, G., & Dorward, L. (2001). Virtual education in universities: a</p><p>technological imperative. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(5), 511-</p><p>523.</p><p></p><p>Ogunnaike, J. (2002). Challenges of the teaching and learning of Literature in Nigerian</p><p>Secondary Schools. Perspectives on applied linguistics in language and</p><p>literature, 334-344.</p><p></p><p>Okamoto, T., Christea, A., & Kayama, M. (2001). Future integrated learning environment</p><p>with multimedia. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17, 4-12.</p><p></p><p>Omar, H., Embi, M. A., &Yunus, M. M. (2012). ESL learners' interaction in an online</p><p>discussion via Facebook. Asian Social Science, 8(11), 67.</p><p></p><p>Ondrejka, D. (2013). Affective teaching in nursing: Connecting to feelings, values, and</p><p>inner awareness. Springer Publishing Company.</p><p></p><p>Oppenheim, A. N. (1992) Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement</p><p>(2nd edition).London: St Martins Press.</p><p></p><p>Parkash Kaur (2000). The Teaching of Reading Skills. Unpublished Manuscript.</p><p>Universiti Putra Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, 3rd edn</p><p>Sage. Thousand Oaks, California.</p><p></p><p>Pedagoskaenciklopedija, (1989), Zavodzaudzbenike i nastavnasredstva, Beograd.</p><p></p><p>Petrovic, N., Petrovic, D., Jeremic, V., Milenkovic, N., & Cirovic, M. (2012). Possible</p><p>educational use of Facebook in higher environmental education. ICICTE 2012</p><p>proceedings, 355-362.</p><p></p><p>Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Hungler, B. P. (2001). Essentials of nursing research:</p><p>Methods, appraisal, and utilization (5th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott.</p><p></p><p>Polit-O'Hara, D., & Beck, C. T. (2006). Essentials of nursing research: Methods,</p><p>appraisal, and utilization (Vol. 1). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.</p><p></p><p>Povey, J.F. 1979. The Teaching of Literature in Advanced ESL classes. In L.McIntosh</p><p>and M.Celce-Murcia (Eds.), Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language.</p><p>Roroley, M.A.: Newbury House.</p><p></p><p>Ractham, P., & Firpo, D. (2011). Using social networking technology to enhance learning</p><p>in higher education: A case study using Facebook. In System Sciences (HICSS),</p><p>2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on (pp. 1-10). IEEE.</p><p></p><p>Rasiah, R. R. V. (2014). Transformative higher education teaching and learning: Using</p><p>social media in a team-based learning environment. Procedia-Social and</p><p>Behavioral Sciences, 123, 369-379.</p><p></p><p>Redecker, C. (2009). Review of Learning 2.0 Practices: Study on the Impact of Web 2.0</p><p>Innovations on Education and Training in Europe, JRC Scientific and Technical</p><p>Report, EUR 23664 EN:</p><p>http://ipts.jrc.ec.europa.eu/publications/pub.cfm?id=2059.</p><p></p><p>Reiser, R.A. (2007). A History of Instructional Design and Technology. In R. A. R. J.</p><p>V.Dempsey (Ed.), Trends and Issues in Instructional Design and Technology.</p><p>Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.</p><p></p><p>Rifkin, W., Longnecker, N., Leach, J., Davis, L., & Orthia, L. (2009). Motivate students</p><p>by having them publish in new media: An invitation to science lecturers to share</p><p>and test. UniServe, 105.</p><p></p><p>Roblyer, M. D., McDaniel, M., Webb, M., Herman, J., & Witty, J. V. (2010). Findings on</p><p>Facebook in higher education: A comparison of college faculty and student uses</p><p>and perceptions of social networking sites. The Internet and higher</p><p>education, 13(3), 134-140.</p><p></p><p>Rodliyah, R. S. (2016). Using A Facebook Closed Group To Improve EFL Students</p><p>writing. TEFLIN Journal, 27(1), 82-100.</p><p></p><p>Routman, R. (1991). Invitations: Changing as teachers and learners K-12. Toronto,</p><p>Canada: Irwin Publishing.</p><p></p><p>Saettler, L. P. (2004). The evolution of American educational technology. IAP.</p><p></p><p>Sage, H. (1987). Incorporating Literature in ESL Instruction. Language in Education:</p><p>Theory and Practice, No. 66. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Book Distribution Center, Route</p><p>59 at Brook Mill Drive, West Nyack, NY 10994.</p><p></p><p>Salaway, G., Caruso, J.B., & Nelson, M. R. (2007). The ECAR Study of Undergraduate</p><p>of Students and Information Technology, 2007: EDUCAUSE.</p><p></p><p>San Miguel, R. (2010) Study on Facebook and Grades Becomes Learning Experience for</p><p>Researcher. TechNewsWorld. http://www.technewsworld.com. Retrieved on</p><p>20/1/17.</p><p></p><p>Sara, S. (2003). A suggested syllabus for the teaching of poetry course in ELT</p><p>Departments of Turkey. Unpublished MA Thesis. Ankara: Hacettepe University.</p><p></p><p>Sbihi, B., & Kadiri, K. E. E. (2010). Towards a participatory E-learning 2.0 A new Elearning</p><p>focused on learners and validation of the content. arXiv preprint</p><p>arXiv:1001.4738.</p><p></p><p>Schneider N. (2010) Facebook, Other Social Network Sites Could Lead to Lower Grades</p><p>for Students. http://www.associatedcontent.com. Retrieved on 20/01/17.</p><p></p><p>Schrum, L., Shelly, G., & Miller, R. (2008). Understanding tech-savvy teachers:</p><p>Identifying their characteristics, motivation and challenges. International Journal</p><p>of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 4(1), 1-20.</p><p></p><p>Schunk, D. (2004). Learning theories: An educational perspective (4th ed.). Upper</p><p>Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.</p><p></p><p>Selwyn, N. (2007, October). Web 2.0 applications as alternative environments for</p><p>informal learning-a critical review. In Paper for CERI-KERIS International</p><p>Expert Meeting on ICT and Educational Performance (pp. 16-17).</p><p></p><p>Selwyn, N. (2008). An investigation of differences in undergraduates' academic use of</p><p>the internet. Active Learning in Higher Education, 9(1), 11-22</p><p></p><p>Sidhu, G. K. (2003). Literature in the language classroom: Seeing through the eyes of</p><p>learners. Teaching of literature in ESL/EFL contexts, 88-110.</p><p></p><p>Siegle, D. (2011). Facing Facebook: A guide for nonteens. Gifted Child Today, 34(2),</p><p>14-19.</p><p></p><p>Siemens, G. (2005) Connectivism: a theory for the digital age International Journal of</p><p>Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, Vol. 2, No. 1.</p><p></p><p>Simon, M. (2011). Assumptions, limitations and delimitations. Retrieved From</p><p>www.dissertationrecipes.com on 2ndJanury 2018.</p><p></p><p>Silverman D.(2000) Doing qualitative research. London: Sage Publications.</p><p></p><p>Sivin-Kachala, J. (1998). Taking Stock: What Does the Research Say About</p><p>Technology's Impact on Education? Interview with Jay Sivin Kachala.</p><p>Technology & Learning. (Online) Retrieved 24 April, 2018, from</p><p>www.techlerning.com/db_area/archives/TL/062000/archives/kachala.html.</p><p></p><p>Siti Norliana, G. (2003). Learner profiles based on attitudes towards literature. MA</p><p>Practicum Report. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Snell, J. (2012). Improving Teacher-Student Interaction in the EFL Classroom. Retrieved</p><p>from http://iteslj.org/Articles/Snell-Interaction.html on 27/1/2018.</p><p></p><p>Son, J. B. (2008). Using web-based language learning activities in the ESL</p><p>classroom. International Journal of Pedagogies and learning, 4(4), 34-43.</p><p></p><p>Son, J. B. (2007). Learner experiences in web-based language learning. Computer</p><p>Assisted Language Learning, 20(1), 21-36.</p><p></p><p>Spradley, J. (1979). The Ethnographic Interview. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and</p><p>Winston.</p><p></p><p>Srirat, K., (2014). Using Facebook group to facilitate teaching English for everyday</p><p>communication. In The 2014 WEI International Academic Conference</p><p>Proceedings. June 22-25, 2014, Budapest, Hungary (pp. 5-10). Retrieved on May</p><p>22, 2017 from</p><p>http://www.westeastinstitute.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Kesinee-Srirat-</p><p>FullPaper.pdf.</p><p></p><p>Suriya Kumar, S. (2004). A study of the motivational factors that influence the learning</p><p>of literature among upper secondary school students in Negeri Sembilan. MA</p><p>Practicum Report. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Susan E. Wyse (2012). Four Main Benefits of Survey Research. Retrieved from</p><p>http://www.snapsurveys.com on 27/12/2016.</p><p></p><p>Talif, R. (1995). Teaching literature in ESL: The Malaysian context. Penerbit Universiti</p><p>Pertanian Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Talif, Rosli & Mukundan, Jayakaran (1994) Using Literature in An Advantaged Situation:</p><p>Issue and Prospects. Paper presented at the National Seminar on New Approaches</p><p>in the Teaching of English. Online documents (http://www.melta.org.my.</p><p>Retrieved on 13/11/16.)</p><p></p><p>Tay, E., & Allen, M. (2011). Designing social media into university learning: technology</p><p>of collaboration or collaboration for technology? Educational Media</p><p>International, 48(3), 151-163.</p><p></p><p>Technopedia (2019). Facebooking Definition. Retrieved on 19, August 2019 from</p><p>https://www.techopedia.com/definition/23446/facebooking.</p><p></p><p>Terantino, J., & Graf, K. (2011). Using Facebook in the language classroom as part of the</p><p>net generation curriculum. Language, 44.</p><p></p><p>Thakur, D. (2003). Teaching Language through Literature: Problems and Principles (Part</p><p>1-5). Yemen Times, 642,13. http://www.yementimes.comarticles. Retrieved on</p><p>21/12/2016.</p><p></p><p>Thaler, E. (2008). Teaching English Literature. Paderborn: Schoningh, UTB.</p><p></p><p>Timperley, H. et al. (2007). Teacher Professional Learning and Development: Best</p><p>Evidence Synthesis Iteration [BES]. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of</p><p>Education. Available at www.educationcounts.govt. Retrieved on 24/1/17.</p><p></p><p>Usha, M.M. (Ed.) (2002), Information Management in New Millennium, Allied, New</p><p>Delhi, p. 679.</p><p></p><p>Vethamani, M.E. (1991) The teaching of Literature in English In Malaysian Secondary</p><p>Schools. Southeast Asian Review of English:23:p 39-51.</p><p></p><p>Vivian, R. (2011, July). University students informal learning practices using Facebook:</p><p>help or hindrance?. In International Conference on ICT in Teaching and</p><p>Learning (pp. 254-267). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.</p><p></p><p>V.V.George & Adam Talib (1980). Malaysian Experience in Innovation and Utilisation</p><p>of Education Media'. Paper presented at the seminar, Kuala Lumpur.</p><p></p><p>Warschauer, M., & Kern, R. (Eds.). (2000). Network-based language teaching: Concepts</p><p>and practice. Cambridge University Press.</p><p></p><p>Westberry, N. C. (2009). An activity theory analysis of social epistemologies within</p><p>tertiary-level eLearning environments (Doctoral dissertation, University of</p><p>Waikato).</p><p></p><p>Wheeler, S., & Boulous, M.K. (2008). Mashing, Burning, Mixing and the Destructive</p><p>Creativity of Web 2.0: Applications for Medical Education. Electronic Journal in</p><p>Communication, Information and Innovation in Health, 1(1), 27-33.</p><p></p><p>Widdowson, H. G. (1984). Explorations in applied linguistics (Vol. 2). Oxford: Oxford</p><p>University Press.</p><p></p><p>Widmayer, S. (n.d.). Schema theory: An introduction. George Mason University.</p><p></p><p>Wiese, D., & Farrugia, R. (2009). Coordinating communication on Facebook: an analysis</p><p>of meaning development through close relationships. Paper presented at the</p><p>annual meeting of the NCA 95th Annual Convention, Chicago Hilton & Towers,</p><p>Chicago, IL.</p><p></p><p>Winn, W., & Snyder, D. (1996). Cognitive perspectives in psychology. Handbook of</p><p>research for educational communications and technology: A project of the</p><p>Association for Educational Communications and Technology, 79-112.</p><p></p><p>Wittkower, W. (Ed.). (2010). Facebook and philosophy: what's on your mind? (Vol. 50).</p><p>Open Court.</p><p></p><p>Wong, F. F., Lee, K. S., Lee, S. K. and Azizah, Y. (2010). English use as an identity</p><p>marker among Malaysian undergraduates. 3L: Journal of Language Teaching,</p><p>Linguistics and Literature. Vol. 18(1), 145-155.</p><p></p><p>Wood, D. (2001), How children think and learn, London: Blackwell Publisher.</p><p></p><p>Yunus, M. M., & Salehi, H. (2012). The effectiveness of Facebook groups on teaching</p><p>and improving writing: Students perceptions. International Journal of Education</p><p>and Information Technologies, 1(6), 87-96.</p><p></p><p>Yusuf Hashim (1991). A study of educational media programs in Malaysian universities</p><p>and colleges. University Microfilms.</p><p></p><p>Zaidieh, A. J. Y. (2012). The use of social networking in education: Challenges and</p><p>opportunities. World of Computer Science and Information Technology Journal</p><p>(WCSIT), 2(1), 18-21.</p><p></p><p>Ziegler, S. (2007) The (mis)education of generation m learning. Media and Technology,</p><p>32(1), 69-81.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p> |