Using Facebook in learning literature among lower secondary school ESL students

<p>Facebook as one of the social networking sites has captured the attention of educators and</p><p>policy-makers as an alternative tool for language teaching and learning. The use of</p><p>Facebook made the teaching and learning...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Logenthini Mariappan
Format: thesis
Language:eng
Published: 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=7241
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:7241
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
collection UPSI Digital Repository
language eng
topic LB Theory and practice of education
spellingShingle LB Theory and practice of education
Logenthini Mariappan
Using Facebook in learning literature among lower secondary school ESL students
description <p>Facebook as one of the social networking sites has captured the attention of educators and</p><p>policy-makers as an alternative tool for language teaching and learning. The use of</p><p>Facebook made the teaching and learning process interesting for the students and had</p><p>given the students an opportunity to better understand novels. The objectives of the study</p><p>were to explore the use of Facebook in learning literature among lower secondary school</p><p>ESL students and to investigate their perception during the learning process. The study</p><p>employed both quantitative and qualitative approaches to research. This study had two</p><p>phases of investigation. The first phase involved survey-questionnaires. Meanwhile, the</p><p>second phase involved conducting a quasi-experiment and semi-structured interviews.</p><p>The subjects employed for the study were 60 lower secondary ESL school students using</p><p>purposive sampling method. The subjects, were then divided equally for the treatment</p><p>and control groups. The findings indicated that Facebook could be an effective tool in</p><p>learning a novel. The results concluded that the students could use Facebook to help them</p><p>understand a novel better. The results of the study implied that the use of Facebook is a</p><p>beneficial literature-learning tool for lower secondary ESL students.</p>
format thesis
qualification_name
qualification_level Doctorate
author Logenthini Mariappan
author_facet Logenthini Mariappan
author_sort Logenthini Mariappan
title Using Facebook in learning literature among lower secondary school ESL students
title_short Using Facebook in learning literature among lower secondary school ESL students
title_full Using Facebook in learning literature among lower secondary school ESL students
title_fullStr Using Facebook in learning literature among lower secondary school ESL students
title_full_unstemmed Using Facebook in learning literature among lower secondary school ESL students
title_sort using facebook in learning literature among lower secondary school esl students
granting_institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
granting_department Fakulti Bahasa dan Komunikasi
publishDate 2021
url https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=7241
_version_ 1747833369235816448
spelling oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:72412022-07-13 Using Facebook in learning literature among lower secondary school ESL students 2021 Logenthini Mariappan LB Theory and practice of education <p>Facebook as one of the social networking sites has captured the attention of educators and</p><p>policy-makers as an alternative tool for language teaching and learning. The use of</p><p>Facebook made the teaching and learning process interesting for the students and had</p><p>given the students an opportunity to better understand novels. The objectives of the study</p><p>were to explore the use of Facebook in learning literature among lower secondary school</p><p>ESL students and to investigate their perception during the learning process. The study</p><p>employed both quantitative and qualitative approaches to research. This study had two</p><p>phases of investigation. The first phase involved survey-questionnaires. Meanwhile, the</p><p>second phase involved conducting a quasi-experiment and semi-structured interviews.</p><p>The subjects employed for the study were 60 lower secondary ESL school students using</p><p>purposive sampling method. The subjects, were then divided equally for the treatment</p><p>and control groups. The findings indicated that Facebook could be an effective tool in</p><p>learning a novel. The results concluded that the students could use Facebook to help them</p><p>understand a novel better. The results of the study implied that the use of Facebook is a</p><p>beneficial literature-learning tool for lower secondary ESL students.</p> 2021 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=7241 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=7241 text eng closedAccess Doctoral Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Bahasa dan Komunikasi <p>Abraham, R. G., & Liou, H. C. (1991). Interaction generated by three computer</p><p>programs: analysis of functions of spoken language. Computer-assisted language</p><p>learning and testing: research issues and practice, 85-109.</p><p></p><p>Ajjan, H., & Hartshorne, R. (2008). Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0</p><p>technologies: Theory and empirical tests. The internet and higher</p><p>education, 11(2), 71-80.</p><p></p><p>Alias, N., Siraj, S., Daud, M. K. A. M., & Hussin, Z. (2013). Effectiveness of Facebook</p><p>based learning to enhance creativity among Islamic studies students by employing</p><p>isman instructional design model. Turkish Online Journal of Educational</p><p>Technology, 12(1), 60-67</p><p></p><p>Amanda, M. (2016, March 27). What Does ESL Mean? Learning English Is Important to</p><p>Every ESL Student. Retrieved from https://www.verywell.com on 13/11/2017.</p><p></p><p>Anderson, J. R. (2005). Cognitive psychology and its implications. New York: Macmillan</p><p></p><p>Anderson, R. C. (1984). Role of the readers schema in comprehension, learning, and</p><p>memory. Learning to read in American schools: Basal readers and content</p><p>texts, 29, 243-257.</p><p></p><p>Annetta, L. A., Minogue, J., Holmes, S. Y., & Cheng, M. T. (2009). Investigating the</p><p>impact of video games on high school students engagement and learning about</p><p>genetics. Computers & Education, 53(1), 74-85.</p><p></p><p>Ariogul, S. (2001). The teaching of reading through short stories in advanced</p><p>classes. Unpublished MA Thesis. Ankara: Hacettepe University.</p><p></p><p>Armstrong, J. & Franklin, T. (2008): A review of current and developing international</p><p>practice in the use of social networking in higher education. Retrieved from</p><p>http://franklin-consulting.co.uk/LinkedDocuments/the use of social networking in</p><p>HE.pdf on 22 March 2017.</p><p></p><p>Askew, M., Brown, M., Rhodes, V., Johnson, D., & Wiliam, D. (1997). Effective</p><p>teachers of numeracy. London: Kings College.</p><p></p><p>Asmah, H. O. (1987). English in Malaysia: A typology of its status and role.</p><p>In Conference on Language Planning in a Multilingual Setting: The Role of</p><p>English. National University, Singapore.</p><p></p><p>Astin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher</p><p>education. Journal of college student personnel, 25(4), 297-308.</p><p></p><p>Atherton J S (2013) Learning and Teaching; Learning and teaching system [On-line:</p><p>UK] retrieved 23 December 2017 from http://www.learningandteaching.info.</p><p></p><p>Augustsson, G. (2010). Web 2.0, pedagogical support for reflexive and emotional social</p><p>interaction among Swedish students. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4),</p><p>197-205.</p><p></p><p>Awodele, O., Idowu, S., Anjorin, O., Adedire, A., & Akpore, V. (2009). University</p><p>enhancement system using a social networking approach: extending elearning.</p><p>Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 6(1), 269-83.</p><p></p><p>Babbie, E. (2010). The practice of social research. Belmont, California: Wadsworth</p><p>Cengage Learning.</p><p></p><p>Baker, T.L. and A.J. Risley (1994) Doing Social Research. New York: McGraw-Hill.</p><p></p><p>Bartlett, F. C. (1958). Thinking. An experimental and social study, New York.</p><p></p><p>Bernard, H. R. (2002). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative</p><p>approaches (3rd ed.). Walnut Creek, California: Alta Mira Press.</p><p></p><p>Bicen, H., & Uzunboylu, H. (2013). The Use of Social Networking Sites in Education : A</p><p>Case Study of Facebook, Journal of Universal Computer Science, 19(5), 658</p><p>671,</p><p></p><p>Blattner, G., & Fiori, M. (2009). Facebook in the language classroom: Promises and</p><p>possibilities. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance</p><p>Learning, 6(1), 17-28.</p><p></p><p>Bognar, L. (1993). Matijevic M. Didaktika, kolska knjiga, Zagreb.</p><p></p><p>Boulos, M. N. K., Maramba, I., & Wheeler, S. (2006). Wikis, blogs and podcasts: a new</p><p>generation of Web-based tools for virtual collaborative clinical practice and</p><p>education. BMC medical education, 6(1), 41.</p><p></p><p>Bowling, A. (1997). Research Methods in Health: Investigating health and health</p><p>services. Buckingham. Open University Press.</p><p></p><p>Boyd, D. (2007). Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics</p><p>in teenage social life. MacArthur foundation series on digital learningYouth,</p><p>identity, and digital media volume, 119-142.</p><p></p><p>Boyd, d. m. and Ellison, N. B. (2007), Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and</p><p>Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13: 210230.</p><p>doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x.</p><p></p><p>Brewer, J., & Hunter, A. (1989). Multimethod research: a synthesis of styles. Sage</p><p>Publications, Inc.</p><p></p><p>Bruning, R., Schraw, G., Norby, M., & Ronning, R. (2004). Cognitive psychology and</p><p>instruction (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Merrill/Prentice Hall.</p><p></p><p>Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2015). Business Research Methods. Oxford: OUP Oxford.</p><p></p><p>Buckley, S., Hasen, G., & Ainley, M. (2004). Affective engagement: A person-centred</p><p>approach to understanding the structure of subjective learning</p><p>experiences. Australian Association for Research in Education, Melbourne:</p><p>Australia.</p><p></p><p>Bulger, R. E. (2002). Research with human beings. The Ethical Dimensions of the</p><p>Biological and Health Sciences, 117-125.</p><p></p><p>Burke, S. C., Snyder, S., & Rager, R. C. (2009). An assessment of faculty usage of</p><p>YouTube as a teaching resource. Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and</p><p>Practice, 7(1), 8.</p><p></p><p>Burns, N., & Grove, S. K. (1997). The practice of nursing research: Conduct, critique &</p><p>utilization. Philadelphia: Saunders.</p><p></p><p>Carroli, P. (2002). Perceptions of Literature: A Comparison of Students and Educators</p><p>Views. In Proceedings of Innovations in Italian teaching workshop (pp. 113-128).</p><p></p><p>Carter, R. A., & Long, M. N. (1991). Teaching literature. Essex: Addison Wesley</p><p>Longman Limited.</p><p></p><p>Celce-Murcia, M., & McIntosh, L. (1991). Teaching English as a second or foreign</p><p>language. Rowley, Massachusetts: Newbury House.</p><p></p><p>Chapelle, C. (2003). English language learning and technology: Lectures on applied</p><p>linguistics in the age of information and communication technology (Vol. 7). John</p><p>Benjamins Publishing.</p><p></p><p>Chen, P. S. D., Lambert, A. D., & Guidry, K. R. (2010). Engaging online learners: The</p><p>impact of Web-based learning technology on college student</p><p>engagement. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1222-1232.</p><p></p><p>Chen, B., & Bryer, T. (2012). Investigating instructional strategies for using social media</p><p>in formal and informal learning. The International Review of Research in Open</p><p>and Distributed Learning, 13(1), 87-104.</p><p></p><p>Crook, C., Fisher, T., Graber, R., Harrison, C., Lewin, C., Cummings, J., & Sharples, M.</p><p>(2008). Implementing Web 2.0 in secondary schools: Impacts, barriers and issues.</p><p></p><p>Coates, H. (2006). Student engagement in campus-based and online education:</p><p>University connections. Routledge. New York.</p><p></p><p>Cohen, D. K., & Hill, H. C. (1998). Instructional policy and classroom performance: The</p><p>mathematics reform in California. Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research</p><p>in Education.</p><p></p><p>Collie, J., & Slater, S. (1987). Literature in the Language Classroom: A Resource Book</p><p>of Ideas and Activities. Cambridge University Press.</p><p></p><p>Cohen, L. & Manion, L. (1994) Research Methods in Education (fourth edition). London:</p><p>Routledge</p><p></p><p>Cooper, J. (2006). Literacy: Helping children construct meaning (6th ed.). New York:</p><p>Houghton Mifflin Company</p><p></p><p>Creswell, J. W. (2009). Editorial: Mapping the field of mixed methods research. Sage</p><p>publications.</p><p></p><p>Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five</p><p>approaches. Sage publications.</p><p></p><p>Dale, C., & Pymm, J. M. (2009). Podagogy The iPod as a learning technology. Active</p><p>Learning in Higher Education, 10(1), 84-96.</p><p></p><p>Darmi, R., & Albion, P. (2013, July). English language in the Malaysian education</p><p>system: its existence and implications. In THIRD MALAYSIAN POSTGRADUATE</p><p>CONFERENCE (MPC) 2013 (p. 175).</p><p></p><p>Delanoy, W. (1997). Teacher mediation and literature learning in the language</p><p>classroom. IATEFL Literature and Culture Special Interest Group Newsletter, 14,</p><p>1-9.</p><p></p><p>Dhillon, K. K., &Mogan, S. (2017). Language-based approaches to understanding</p><p>literature : A creative activity module. The English Teacher, (2), 16.</p><p></p><p>Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook friends:</p><p>Social capital and college students use of online social network sites. Journal of</p><p>Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143-1168.</p><p></p><p>Erjavec, K. (2013). Informal learning through Facebook among Slovenian pupils.</p><p>Comunicar, 21(41), 117-126.</p><p></p><p>ESL. (2016). In Urban Dictionary Online. Retrieved on 15/7/207 from</p><p>http://www.urbandictionary.com.</p><p></p><p>E. Qualman. (2009). Socialnomics: How Social Media Transforms the Way We Live and</p><p>Do Business. Adapted by permission of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ISBN: 978-0-</p><p>470-47723-6. [Online]. Available:</p><p>http://www.ebscohost.com/uploads/corpLearn/pdf/bbs_socialnomics.pdf</p><p></p><p>Facebook, (2013). Key facts. Facebook. http:// http://newsroom.fb.com/company-info.</p><p>Retrieved on 30/7/2017.</p><p></p><p>Freeman W (2014), Taming social media in higher education classrooms. In: Proceedings</p><p>for the 9th international conference on networked learning, pp 359363.</p><p></p><p>Gagne, E. D., Yekovich, C. W., & Yekovich, F. R. (1993). The cognitive psychology of</p><p>school learning. Allyn & Bacon.</p><p></p><p>Garrison, D. R., & Akyol, Z. (2009). Role of Instructional Technology in The</p><p>Transformation of Higher Education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education,</p><p>21, 19-30.</p><p></p><p>Gaston, J. (2006). Reaching and teaching the digital natives. Library Hi Tech</p><p>News, 23(3), 12-13.</p><p></p><p>Ghani, M. B. (2015). Using Facebook in Teaching and Learning English. In The</p><p>International Conference on Language, Literature, Culture and Education (pp.</p><p>25-26).</p><p></p><p>Gonzales-Bueno, M., & Perez, L. (2000). Electronic mail in foreign language writing: A</p><p>study of grammatical and lexical accuracy and quantity of language. Foreign</p><p>Language Annals, 33, 189-197.</p><p></p><p>Griffith, S., & Liyanage, L. (2008). An introduction to the potential of social networking</p><p>sites in education, In: Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Second</p><p>Emerging Technologies Conference 2008. Australia: Wollongong.</p><p></p><p>Gubrium, J. F., & Holstein, J. A. (2001). Handbook of interview research: Context and</p><p>method. Sage.</p><p></p><p>Guskey, T. R. (1988). Teacher efficacy, self-concept, and attitudes toward the</p><p>implementation of instructional innovation. Teaching and teacher education, 4(1),</p><p>63-69.</p><p></p><p>Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data</p><p>analysis (5th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.</p><p></p><p>Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate Data</p><p>Analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall. JOUR.</p><p></p><p>Hall, R., & Hall, M. (2010). Scoping the pedagogic relationship between self-efficacy</p><p>and Web 2.0 technologies. Learning, Media and Technology, 35(3), 255-273.</p><p></p><p>Hamid, S., Kurnia, S., Waycott, J., & Chang, S. (2011). Exploring Malaysian students'</p><p>perspectives of Online Social Networking (OSN) use for higher education.</p><p>In 22nd Annual Conference ISANA International Education Association (ISANA)</p><p>2011, Hobart, Tasmania</p><p></p><p>Hamid, S., Waycott, J., Chang, S., & Kurnia, S. (2011). Appropriating online social</p><p>networking (OSN) activities for higher education: Two Malaysian</p><p>cases. Changing Demands, Changing Directions. Proceedings ascilite Hobart,</p><p>526-538.</p><p></p><p>Haythornthwaite, C. (2005). Social network methods and measures for examining elearning.</p><p>Social networks, 2005, 1-22.</p><p></p><p>Hedge, T. (2001). Teaching and learning in the language classroom (Vol. 106). Oxford,,</p><p>UK: Oxford University Press.</p><p></p><p>Heiberger, G., & Harper, R. (2008). Have you Facebooked Astin lately? Using</p><p>technology to increase student involvement. New directions for student</p><p>services, 2008(124), 19-35.</p><p></p><p>Hewitt, A., & Forte, A. (2006). Crossing boundaries: Identity management and</p><p>student/faculty relationships on the Facebook. Poster presented at CSCW, Banff,</p><p>Alberta, 1-2.</p><p></p><p>Higgins, S., & Moseley, D. (2001). Teachers' thinking about information and</p><p>communications technology and learning: Beliefs and outcomes. Teacher</p><p>development, 5(2), 191-210.</p><p></p><p>Higher Education Research Institute (2007) College freshmen and online social</p><p>networking sites. Available at: http://www.gseis.ucla.edu (last accessed 7 March</p><p>2017).</p><p></p><p>Hirst, P. H., & Peters, R. S. (1970). The logic of education (Vol. 25). London: Routledge</p><p>& Kegan Paul.</p><p></p><p>Holmes, M., & Bloxham, M. (2007). An observational method for time use research:</p><p>Advantages, disadvantages and lessons learned from the Middletown media</p><p>studies. Conference of the International Association of Time Use Researchers.</p><p>Washington, D.C.</p><p></p><p>Huang, S.J. & Liu, H.F. (2000). Communicative Language Teaching in a Multimedia</p><p>Language Lab. The Internet TESL Journal, 6(2). Retrieved Jan 23, 2018, from</p><p>http://iteslj.org/Articles/Lee-CALLbarriers.html.</p><p></p><p>Hughes, J., & Tolley, S. (2010). Engaging students through new literacies: The good, bad</p><p>and curriculum of visual essays. English in Education, 44(1), 5-26.</p><p></p><p>Hull, K. (2014). Using Facebook in the classroom. International Journal of Social Media</p><p>and Interactive Learning Environments, 2(1), 60-69.</p><p></p><p>Jones, N., Blackey, H., Fitzgibbon, K., & Chew, E. (2010). Get out of</p><p>MySpace!. Computers & Education, 54(3), 776-782.</p><p></p><p>Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and</p><p>opportunities of Social Media. Business horizons, 53(1), 59-68.</p><p></p><p>Karl, K. A., & Peluchette, J. V. (2011). Friending professors, parents and bosses: A</p><p>Facebook connection conundrum. Journal of Education for Business, 86(4), 214-</p><p>222.</p><p></p><p>Kearsley, G., & Shneiderman, B. (1998). Engagement theory: A framework for</p><p>technology-based teaching and learning. Educational technology, 38(5), 20-23.</p><p></p><p>Keengwe, J., & Kidd, T. T. (2010). Towards best practices in online learning and</p><p>teaching in higher education. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(2),</p><p>533.</p><p></p><p>Kelner, L. B. (1993). The Creative Classroom: A Guide for Using Creative Drama in the</p><p>Classroom, PreK-6. Heinemann, 361 Hanover St., Portsmouth, NH 03801-3912..</p><p></p><p>Kementerian Pelajaran (1964) 'Pusat Pengajaran Pandang Dengar (A.V.A) untuk sekolah</p><p>sekolah kebangsaan', Kuala Lumpur.</p><p></p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (2010). 2011 Primary English language</p><p>curriculum.Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum: Kementerian Pelajaran</p><p>Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Kennedy, G., Judd, T., Dalgarno, B., & Waycott, J. (2010). Beyond natives and</p><p>immigrants: exploring types of net generation students. Journal of Computer</p><p>Assisted Learning, 26(5), 332-343.</p><p></p><p>Kirschner, P.A. (2002). Can we support CSCL? Educational, social and technological</p><p>affordances for learning. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL: Can we</p><p>support CSCL? (pp. 7-47). Heerlen, The Netherlands: Open University of the</p><p>Netherlands.</p><p></p><p>Kleiner, A. (2002). Karen Stephenson's quantum theory of trust. Strategy and Business,</p><p>54-54.</p><p></p><p>Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential education: Experience as the source of learning and</p><p>development. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.</p><p></p><p>Kundu, Arnab. (2018). A Study on Indian Teachers Roles and Willingness to Accept</p><p>Educational Technology.</p><p></p><p>Kulik, J. A. (1994). Meta-analytic studies of findings on computer-based</p><p>instruction. Technology assessment in education and training, 1, 9-34.</p><p></p><p>Lantis, J. S. (2000). Teaching Introductory International Relations with Cases and</p><p>Analytical Exercises. The New International Studies Classroom: Active Teaching,</p><p>Active Learning, edited by JS Lantis, LM Kuzma and J. Boehrer. Boulder, CO:</p><p>Lynne Rienner Publishers.</p><p></p><p>Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The latent</p><p>semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of</p><p>knowledge. Psychological review, 104(2), 211.</p><p></p><p>Lazar, G. (1993). Literature and language teaching: a guide for teachers and trainers.</p><p>Cambridge University Press.</p><p></p><p>Lazar, G. (2008). Literature and language teaching: A guide for teachers and trainers.</p><p>Ernst Klett Sprachen.</p><p></p><p>Lee, L. (2003). Perspectives of nonnative speakers of Spanish on two types of online</p><p>collaborative exchanges: Promises and challenges. In L. Lomicka & J.</p><p>CookePlagwitz (Eds.), Teaching with technology (pp. 221-248). Boston: Thomson</p><p>& Heinle.</p><p></p><p>Lenhart, A., Purcell, K., Smith, A., & Zickuhr, K. (2010). Social Media & Mobile</p><p>Internet Use among Teens and Young Adults. Millennials. Pew internet &</p><p>American life project.</p><p></p><p>Lewis, J. & Ritchie, J., (2003). Qualitative Research Practice: A guide for Social Science</p><p>Students and Researchers. Sage Publications.</p><p></p><p>Li, C. S., & Irby, B. (2008). An overview of online education: Attractiveness, benefits,</p><p>challenges, concerns and recommendations. College Student Journal, 42(2), 449.</p><p></p><p>Likert, R. 1932. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology,</p><p>Vol. 22, No. 140.</p><p></p><p>Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills.</p><p>Lowedahl, J.M. (2011). Hype cycle for higher education 2011. Gartner research report</p><p>(Retrieved from</p><p>http://www85.homepage.villanova.edu/timothy.ay/DIT2160/BYOD/hype_cycle_f</p><p>or_education_201_214466.pdf on 29/4/2017).</p><p></p><p>Lusk, B. (2010). Digital natives and social media behavior: an overview. The Prevention</p><p>Researcher, 17(S1), 3-7.</p><p></p><p>Lyons, C. (1983,). The Relationship of Prospective Teachers' Neural Processing,</p><p>Cognitive Style and Personality Type to Classroom Learning and Teaching</p><p>Behaviors. In Ohio Journal of Science (Vol. 83, No. 2, pp. 77-77).</p><p></p><p>Lytton, H. (1971). Observation studies of parent-child interaction: A methodological</p><p>review. Child Development, 651-684.</p><p></p><p>Madge, C., Meek, J., Wellens, J., & Hooley, T. (2009). Facebook, social integration and</p><p>informal learning at university:It is more for socialising and talking to friends</p><p>about work than for actually doing work. Learning, Media and</p><p>Technology, 34(2), 141-155.</p><p></p><p>Mahmood, A.H., & Rahman , A.R.. (2002). Teknik pengajaran sastera dalam Bahasa</p><p>Melayu. Jurnal Dewan Bahasa 25(6), 12-17.</p><p></p><p>Mariappan, L., Abu, A. G. B., & Omar, A. B. (2017). Facebooking for a More Lively</p><p>Interaction in Literature Classroom. Creative Education, 8(05), 749.</p><p></p><p>Marhan, A. M. (2006). Connectivism: Concepts and principles for emerging learning</p><p>networks. In The 1 st Conference on Virtual Learning.</p><p></p><p>Marshall, C. (1991). Teachers' learning styles: How they affect student learning. The</p><p>Clearing House, 64(4), 225-227.</p><p></p><p>Martinez, M., &Roser, N. L. (1991). Children's responses to literature. Handbook of</p><p>research on teaching the English language arts, 2. Macmillan. New York.</p><p></p><p>Massy, William (2002, May). Distance Education: Guidelines for Good Practice. AFT,</p><p>pp. 9, 16.</p><p></p><p>Mauzy, D. K. (1985). Language and language policy in Malaysia. Language policy and</p><p>national unity, 151-177.</p><p></p><p>Mazer, J. P., Murphy, R. E., & Simonds, C. J. (2009). The effects of teacher</p><p>self-disclosure via Facebook on teacher credibility. Learning, Media and</p><p>technology, 34(2), 175-183.</p><p></p><p>Mazer, J., Murphy, R. & Simonds, C. (2007). Ill see you on Facebook: The effects of</p><p>computer-mediated teacher self-disclosure on student motivation, affective</p><p>learning, and classroom climate. Communication Education, 56(1), 117.</p><p></p><p>Mazman, S.G. &Usluel, Y.K., (2010). Modeling educational usage of Facebook.</p><p>Computers and Education. 55, 444-453.</p><p></p><p>McKay, S. (1982). Literature in the ESL classroom. Tesol Quarterly, 529-536.</p><p></p><p>McKenzie, D. (1985). The extraction of magma from the crust and mantle. Earth and</p><p>Planetary Science Letters, 74(1), 81-91.</p><p></p><p>McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. (2007, December). Social software and participatory</p><p>learning: Pedagogical choices with technology affordances in the Web 2.0 era.</p><p>In ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings ascilite</p><p>Singapore 2007 (pp. 664-675).</p><p></p><p>McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. (2008). The three p's of pedagogy for the networked</p><p>society: Personalization, participation, and productivity. International Journal of</p><p>Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(1), 10-27.</p><p></p><p>McRae, J. (1991). Literature with a Small l. London & Basingstoke: Macmillan.</p><p></p><p>Mehdikhani, N. (1983). The relative effects of teacher teaching style, teacher learning</p><p>style, and student learning style upon student academic achievement (Doctoral</p><p>dissertation, Catholic University of America).</p><p></p><p>Mellon, C. A. (1999). Technology and the great pendulum of education. Journal of</p><p>Research on Computing in Education, 32(1), 28-35.</p><p></p><p>Menezes, H. (2012). Using Digital Storytelling to Improve Literacy Skills. International</p><p>Association for Development of the Information Society.</p><p></p><p>Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education.</p><p>Revised and Expanded from" Case Study Research in Education. Jossey-Bass</p><p>Publishers.</p><p></p><p>Mertler, C. A., & Reinhart, R. V. (2016). Advanced and multivariate statistical methods:</p><p>Practical application and interpretation. Routledge.</p><p></p><p>Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded</p><p>sourcebook. Sage Publications.</p><p></p><p>Minocha, S. (2008). A study on the effective use of social software by further and higher</p><p>education in the UK to support student learning and engagement. Bristol, UK:</p><p>Joint Information Systems Committee. Retrieved August 25, 2017, from</p><p>http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/projects/effective-use-of-social-softwarein-</p><p>education-finalreport.pdf.</p><p></p><p>Mitchell, R and Myles, F. (2004) Second Language Learning Theories, 2nd edition.</p><p>London: Arnold; New York, distributed by Oxford University Press (chapter 2).</p><p></p><p>Ministry of Education (1989) Curriculum Specifications for English Language Form</p><p>Four, Kuala Lumpur.</p><p></p><p>Nawi Ismail, (2004) Komsas & minat membaca pelajar. Pelita Bahasa. Disember, 6(12),</p><p>11-13.</p><p></p><p>Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory (2nd Edit.) McGraw-Hill. Hillsdale, New</p><p>Jersey.</p><p></p><p>Nunan, D. (1992). Research methods in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge</p><p>University Press.</p><p></p><p>Jamin, N. B. (1978). The development of educational media service in Malaysia, 1957-</p><p>1972 (Doctoral dissertation, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale).</p><p></p><p>ODonoghue, J., Singh, G., & Dorward, L. (2001). Virtual education in universities: a</p><p>technological imperative. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(5), 511-</p><p>523.</p><p></p><p>Ogunnaike, J. (2002). Challenges of the teaching and learning of Literature in Nigerian</p><p>Secondary Schools. Perspectives on applied linguistics in language and</p><p>literature, 334-344.</p><p></p><p>Okamoto, T., Christea, A., & Kayama, M. (2001). Future integrated learning environment</p><p>with multimedia. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17, 4-12.</p><p></p><p>Omar, H., Embi, M. A., &Yunus, M. M. (2012). ESL learners' interaction in an online</p><p>discussion via Facebook. Asian Social Science, 8(11), 67.</p><p></p><p>Ondrejka, D. (2013). Affective teaching in nursing: Connecting to feelings, values, and</p><p>inner awareness. Springer Publishing Company.</p><p></p><p>Oppenheim, A. N. (1992) Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement</p><p>(2nd edition).London: St Martins Press.</p><p></p><p>Parkash Kaur (2000). The Teaching of Reading Skills. Unpublished Manuscript.</p><p>Universiti Putra Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, 3rd edn</p><p>Sage. Thousand Oaks, California.</p><p></p><p>Pedagoskaenciklopedija, (1989), Zavodzaudzbenike i nastavnasredstva, Beograd.</p><p></p><p>Petrovic, N., Petrovic, D., Jeremic, V., Milenkovic, N., & Cirovic, M. (2012). Possible</p><p>educational use of Facebook in higher environmental education. ICICTE 2012</p><p>proceedings, 355-362.</p><p></p><p>Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Hungler, B. P. (2001). Essentials of nursing research:</p><p>Methods, appraisal, and utilization (5th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott.</p><p></p><p>Polit-O'Hara, D., & Beck, C. T. (2006). Essentials of nursing research: Methods,</p><p>appraisal, and utilization (Vol. 1). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.</p><p></p><p>Povey, J.F. 1979. The Teaching of Literature in Advanced ESL classes. In L.McIntosh</p><p>and M.Celce-Murcia (Eds.), Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language.</p><p>Roroley, M.A.: Newbury House.</p><p></p><p>Ractham, P., & Firpo, D. (2011). Using social networking technology to enhance learning</p><p>in higher education: A case study using Facebook. In System Sciences (HICSS),</p><p>2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on (pp. 1-10). IEEE.</p><p></p><p>Rasiah, R. R. V. (2014). Transformative higher education teaching and learning: Using</p><p>social media in a team-based learning environment. Procedia-Social and</p><p>Behavioral Sciences, 123, 369-379.</p><p></p><p>Redecker, C. (2009). Review of Learning 2.0 Practices: Study on the Impact of Web 2.0</p><p>Innovations on Education and Training in Europe, JRC Scientific and Technical</p><p>Report, EUR 23664 EN:</p><p>http://ipts.jrc.ec.europa.eu/publications/pub.cfm?id=2059.</p><p></p><p>Reiser, R.A. (2007). A History of Instructional Design and Technology. In R. A. R. J.</p><p>V.Dempsey (Ed.), Trends and Issues in Instructional Design and Technology.</p><p>Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.</p><p></p><p>Rifkin, W., Longnecker, N., Leach, J., Davis, L., & Orthia, L. (2009). Motivate students</p><p>by having them publish in new media: An invitation to science lecturers to share</p><p>and test. UniServe, 105.</p><p></p><p>Roblyer, M. D., McDaniel, M., Webb, M., Herman, J., & Witty, J. V. (2010). Findings on</p><p>Facebook in higher education: A comparison of college faculty and student uses</p><p>and perceptions of social networking sites. The Internet and higher</p><p>education, 13(3), 134-140.</p><p></p><p>Rodliyah, R. S. (2016). Using A Facebook Closed Group To Improve EFL Students</p><p>writing. TEFLIN Journal, 27(1), 82-100.</p><p></p><p>Routman, R. (1991). Invitations: Changing as teachers and learners K-12. Toronto,</p><p>Canada: Irwin Publishing.</p><p></p><p>Saettler, L. P. (2004). The evolution of American educational technology. IAP.</p><p></p><p>Sage, H. (1987). Incorporating Literature in ESL Instruction. Language in Education:</p><p>Theory and Practice, No. 66. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Book Distribution Center, Route</p><p>59 at Brook Mill Drive, West Nyack, NY 10994.</p><p></p><p>Salaway, G., Caruso, J.B., & Nelson, M. R. (2007). The ECAR Study of Undergraduate</p><p>of Students and Information Technology, 2007: EDUCAUSE.</p><p></p><p>San Miguel, R. (2010) Study on Facebook and Grades Becomes Learning Experience for</p><p>Researcher. TechNewsWorld. http://www.technewsworld.com. Retrieved on</p><p>20/1/17.</p><p></p><p>Sara, S. (2003). A suggested syllabus for the teaching of poetry course in ELT</p><p>Departments of Turkey. Unpublished MA Thesis. Ankara: Hacettepe University.</p><p></p><p>Sbihi, B., & Kadiri, K. E. E. (2010). Towards a participatory E-learning 2.0 A new Elearning</p><p>focused on learners and validation of the content. arXiv preprint</p><p>arXiv:1001.4738.</p><p></p><p>Schneider N. (2010) Facebook, Other Social Network Sites Could Lead to Lower Grades</p><p>for Students. http://www.associatedcontent.com. Retrieved on 20/01/17.</p><p></p><p>Schrum, L., Shelly, G., & Miller, R. (2008). Understanding tech-savvy teachers:</p><p>Identifying their characteristics, motivation and challenges. International Journal</p><p>of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 4(1), 1-20.</p><p></p><p>Schunk, D. (2004). Learning theories: An educational perspective (4th ed.). Upper</p><p>Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.</p><p></p><p>Selwyn, N. (2007, October). Web 2.0 applications as alternative environments for</p><p>informal learning-a critical review. In Paper for CERI-KERIS International</p><p>Expert Meeting on ICT and Educational Performance (pp. 16-17).</p><p></p><p>Selwyn, N. (2008). An investigation of differences in undergraduates' academic use of</p><p>the internet. Active Learning in Higher Education, 9(1), 11-22</p><p></p><p>Sidhu, G. K. (2003). Literature in the language classroom: Seeing through the eyes of</p><p>learners. Teaching of literature in ESL/EFL contexts, 88-110.</p><p></p><p>Siegle, D. (2011). Facing Facebook: A guide for nonteens. Gifted Child Today, 34(2),</p><p>14-19.</p><p></p><p>Siemens, G. (2005) Connectivism: a theory for the digital age International Journal of</p><p>Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, Vol. 2, No. 1.</p><p></p><p>Simon, M. (2011). Assumptions, limitations and delimitations. Retrieved From</p><p>www.dissertationrecipes.com on 2ndJanury 2018.</p><p></p><p>Silverman D.(2000) Doing qualitative research. London: Sage Publications.</p><p></p><p>Sivin-Kachala, J. (1998). Taking Stock: What Does the Research Say About</p><p>Technology's Impact on Education? Interview with Jay Sivin Kachala.</p><p>Technology & Learning. (Online) Retrieved 24 April, 2018, from</p><p>www.techlerning.com/db_area/archives/TL/062000/archives/kachala.html.</p><p></p><p>Siti Norliana, G. (2003). Learner profiles based on attitudes towards literature. MA</p><p>Practicum Report. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Snell, J. (2012). Improving Teacher-Student Interaction in the EFL Classroom. Retrieved</p><p>from http://iteslj.org/Articles/Snell-Interaction.html on 27/1/2018.</p><p></p><p>Son, J. B. (2008). Using web-based language learning activities in the ESL</p><p>classroom. International Journal of Pedagogies and learning, 4(4), 34-43.</p><p></p><p>Son, J. B. (2007). Learner experiences in web-based language learning. Computer</p><p>Assisted Language Learning, 20(1), 21-36.</p><p></p><p>Spradley, J. (1979). The Ethnographic Interview. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and</p><p>Winston.</p><p></p><p>Srirat, K., (2014). Using Facebook group to facilitate teaching English for everyday</p><p>communication. In The 2014 WEI International Academic Conference</p><p>Proceedings. June 22-25, 2014, Budapest, Hungary (pp. 5-10). Retrieved on May</p><p>22, 2017 from</p><p>http://www.westeastinstitute.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Kesinee-Srirat-</p><p>FullPaper.pdf.</p><p></p><p>Suriya Kumar, S. (2004). A study of the motivational factors that influence the learning</p><p>of literature among upper secondary school students in Negeri Sembilan. MA</p><p>Practicum Report. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Susan E. Wyse (2012). Four Main Benefits of Survey Research. Retrieved from</p><p>http://www.snapsurveys.com on 27/12/2016.</p><p></p><p>Talif, R. (1995). Teaching literature in ESL: The Malaysian context. Penerbit Universiti</p><p>Pertanian Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Talif, Rosli & Mukundan, Jayakaran (1994) Using Literature in An Advantaged Situation:</p><p>Issue and Prospects. Paper presented at the National Seminar on New Approaches</p><p>in the Teaching of English. Online documents (http://www.melta.org.my.</p><p>Retrieved on 13/11/16.)</p><p></p><p>Tay, E., & Allen, M. (2011). Designing social media into university learning: technology</p><p>of collaboration or collaboration for technology? Educational Media</p><p>International, 48(3), 151-163.</p><p></p><p>Technopedia (2019). Facebooking Definition. Retrieved on 19, August 2019 from</p><p>https://www.techopedia.com/definition/23446/facebooking.</p><p></p><p>Terantino, J., & Graf, K. (2011). Using Facebook in the language classroom as part of the</p><p>net generation curriculum. Language, 44.</p><p></p><p>Thakur, D. (2003). Teaching Language through Literature: Problems and Principles (Part</p><p>1-5). Yemen Times, 642,13. http://www.yementimes.comarticles. Retrieved on</p><p>21/12/2016.</p><p></p><p>Thaler, E. (2008). Teaching English Literature. Paderborn: Schoningh, UTB.</p><p></p><p>Timperley, H. et al. (2007). Teacher Professional Learning and Development: Best</p><p>Evidence Synthesis Iteration [BES]. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of</p><p>Education. Available at www.educationcounts.govt. Retrieved on 24/1/17.</p><p></p><p>Usha, M.M. (Ed.) (2002), Information Management in New Millennium, Allied, New</p><p>Delhi, p. 679.</p><p></p><p>Vethamani, M.E. (1991) The teaching of Literature in English In Malaysian Secondary</p><p>Schools. Southeast Asian Review of English:23:p 39-51.</p><p></p><p>Vivian, R. (2011, July). University students informal learning practices using Facebook:</p><p>help or hindrance?. In International Conference on ICT in Teaching and</p><p>Learning (pp. 254-267). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.</p><p></p><p>V.V.George & Adam Talib (1980). Malaysian Experience in Innovation and Utilisation</p><p>of Education Media'. Paper presented at the seminar, Kuala Lumpur.</p><p></p><p>Warschauer, M., & Kern, R. (Eds.). (2000). Network-based language teaching: Concepts</p><p>and practice. Cambridge University Press.</p><p></p><p>Westberry, N. C. (2009). An activity theory analysis of social epistemologies within</p><p>tertiary-level eLearning environments (Doctoral dissertation, University of</p><p>Waikato).</p><p></p><p>Wheeler, S., & Boulous, M.K. (2008). Mashing, Burning, Mixing and the Destructive</p><p>Creativity of Web 2.0: Applications for Medical Education. Electronic Journal in</p><p>Communication, Information and Innovation in Health, 1(1), 27-33.</p><p></p><p>Widdowson, H. G. (1984). Explorations in applied linguistics (Vol. 2). Oxford: Oxford</p><p>University Press.</p><p></p><p>Widmayer, S. (n.d.). Schema theory: An introduction. George Mason University.</p><p></p><p>Wiese, D., & Farrugia, R. (2009). Coordinating communication on Facebook: an analysis</p><p>of meaning development through close relationships. Paper presented at the</p><p>annual meeting of the NCA 95th Annual Convention, Chicago Hilton & Towers,</p><p>Chicago, IL.</p><p></p><p>Winn, W., & Snyder, D. (1996). Cognitive perspectives in psychology. Handbook of</p><p>research for educational communications and technology: A project of the</p><p>Association for Educational Communications and Technology, 79-112.</p><p></p><p>Wittkower, W. (Ed.). (2010). Facebook and philosophy: what's on your mind? (Vol. 50).</p><p>Open Court.</p><p></p><p>Wong, F. F., Lee, K. S., Lee, S. K. and Azizah, Y. (2010). English use as an identity</p><p>marker among Malaysian undergraduates. 3L: Journal of Language Teaching,</p><p>Linguistics and Literature. Vol. 18(1), 145-155.</p><p></p><p>Wood, D. (2001), How children think and learn, London: Blackwell Publisher.</p><p></p><p>Yunus, M. M., & Salehi, H. (2012). The effectiveness of Facebook groups on teaching</p><p>and improving writing: Students perceptions. International Journal of Education</p><p>and Information Technologies, 1(6), 87-96.</p><p></p><p>Yusuf Hashim (1991). A study of educational media programs in Malaysian universities</p><p>and colleges. University Microfilms.</p><p></p><p>Zaidieh, A. J. Y. (2012). The use of social networking in education: Challenges and</p><p>opportunities. World of Computer Science and Information Technology Journal</p><p>(WCSIT), 2(1), 18-21.</p><p></p><p>Ziegler, S. (2007) The (mis)education of generation m learning. Media and Technology,</p><p>32(1), 69-81.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p>