Pembangunan PhyKER Games bagi tajuk litar elektrik sekolah menengah dan kesannya ke atas motivasi dan pencapaian

Pembangunan PhyKER Games bagi tajuk litar elektrik sekolah menengah dan kesannya ke atas motivasi dan pencapaian

<p>Kajian ini bertujuan membangunkan permainan yang dinamai PhyKER Games bagi</p><p>tajuk Litar Elektrik untuk pelajar sekolah menengah dan menguji kesan</p><p>penggunaannya dalam pembelajaran ke atas pencapaian dan motivasi pelaj...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Norfaridatul Akmar Hasim
Format: thesis
Language:zsm
Published: 2021
Subjects:
QC Physics
Online Access:https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=8510
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:8510
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
collection UPSI Digital Repository
language zsm
topic QC Physics
spellingShingle QC Physics
Norfaridatul Akmar Hasim
Pembangunan PhyKER Games bagi tajuk litar elektrik sekolah menengah dan kesannya ke atas motivasi dan pencapaian
description <p>Kajian ini bertujuan membangunkan permainan yang dinamai PhyKER Games bagi</p><p>tajuk Litar Elektrik untuk pelajar sekolah menengah dan menguji kesan</p><p>penggunaannya dalam pembelajaran ke atas pencapaian dan motivasi pelajar. Kajian</p><p>ini menggunakan reka bentuk Kajian Perekaan dan Pembangunan (DDR) termasuk</p><p>kuasi eksperimen bagi menentukan kesan penggunaan permainan tersebut. Fasa</p><p>pertama kajian iaitu analisis keperluan melibatkan keseluruhan populasi 504 pelajar di</p><p>sekolah Wilayah Persekutuan Putrajaya. Seramai 384 pelajar Tingkatan 5 memberi</p><p>respon yang mana 66.9% pelajar menyatakan tajuk Elektrik adalah tajuk yang paling</p><p>sukar manakala kaedah pembelajaran berasaskan permainan menjadi pilihan 62.2%</p><p>pelajar. Fasa kedua kajian iaitu reka bentuk dan pembangunan PhyKER Games</p><p>melibatkan seramai tiga orang pakar bagi mendapatkan kesahan kandungan. Dapatan</p><p>menunjukkan PhyKER Games mempunyai kesahan kandungan yang memuaskan</p><p>dengan nilai Indeks Kesahan Kandungan 0.95. Bagi menguji kebolehgunaan dan</p><p>kebolehlaksanaan PhyKER Games instrumen yang digunakan ialah soal selidik yang</p><p>diadaptasi daripada instrumen sedia ada. Dapatan menunjukkan PhyKER Games</p><p>mempunyai kebolehlaksanaan dan kebolehgunaan yang baik dengan peratus</p><p>persetujuan antara pengguna melebihi 75%. Bahagian terakhir kajian ialah fasa</p><p>penilaian kesan penggunaan PhyKER Games. Dapatan menunjukkan bahawa terdapat</p><p>perbezaan yang signifikan antara pencapaian skor pelajar dalam kumpulan rawatan</p><p>(n=30, M = 66.58, SD = 11.587) melalui ujian-t sampel bebas dengan nilai t (58) = -</p><p>5.960, p = 0.000, dengan pelajar dalam kumpulan kawalan (n=30, M = 50.92, SD =</p><p>8.547). Analisis korelasi Pearson dengan nilai r=0.82 menunjukkan terdapat hubungan</p><p>yang kuat dan signifikan antara motivasi menggunakan PhyKER Games dengan skor</p><p>pencapaian pascaujian. Kesimpulannya, kajian ini berjaya membangunkan sebuah</p><p>permainan pendidikan dalam tajuk Litar Elektrik yang berkesan dalam meningkatkan</p><p>pencapaian dan motivasi pelajar. Implikasinya, PhyKER Games boleh dijadikan</p><p>sebagai rujukan kepada guru sebagai contoh permainan yang berkesan dan oleh itu</p><p>boleh dimanfaatkan dalam pembelajaran berasaskan permainan. Selain itu, PhyKER</p><p>Games boleh menjadi panduan bagi penyelidik dan guru bagi membangunkan</p><p>permainan serupa bagi tujuan pengajaran dan pembelajaran.</p>
format thesis
qualification_name
qualification_level Doctorate
author Norfaridatul Akmar Hasim
author_facet Norfaridatul Akmar Hasim
author_sort Norfaridatul Akmar Hasim
title Pembangunan PhyKER Games bagi tajuk litar elektrik sekolah menengah dan kesannya ke atas motivasi dan pencapaian
title_short Pembangunan PhyKER Games bagi tajuk litar elektrik sekolah menengah dan kesannya ke atas motivasi dan pencapaian
title_full Pembangunan PhyKER Games bagi tajuk litar elektrik sekolah menengah dan kesannya ke atas motivasi dan pencapaian
title_fullStr Pembangunan PhyKER Games bagi tajuk litar elektrik sekolah menengah dan kesannya ke atas motivasi dan pencapaian
title_full_unstemmed Pembangunan PhyKER Games bagi tajuk litar elektrik sekolah menengah dan kesannya ke atas motivasi dan pencapaian
title_sort pembangunan phyker games bagi tajuk litar elektrik sekolah menengah dan kesannya ke atas motivasi dan pencapaian
granting_institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
granting_department Fakulti Sains dan Matematik
publishDate 2021
url https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=8510
_version_ 1776104533550694400
spelling oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:85102022-12-15 Pembangunan PhyKER Games bagi tajuk litar elektrik sekolah menengah dan kesannya ke atas motivasi dan pencapaian 2021 Norfaridatul Akmar Hasim QC Physics <p>Kajian ini bertujuan membangunkan permainan yang dinamai PhyKER Games bagi</p><p>tajuk Litar Elektrik untuk pelajar sekolah menengah dan menguji kesan</p><p>penggunaannya dalam pembelajaran ke atas pencapaian dan motivasi pelajar. Kajian</p><p>ini menggunakan reka bentuk Kajian Perekaan dan Pembangunan (DDR) termasuk</p><p>kuasi eksperimen bagi menentukan kesan penggunaan permainan tersebut. Fasa</p><p>pertama kajian iaitu analisis keperluan melibatkan keseluruhan populasi 504 pelajar di</p><p>sekolah Wilayah Persekutuan Putrajaya. Seramai 384 pelajar Tingkatan 5 memberi</p><p>respon yang mana 66.9% pelajar menyatakan tajuk Elektrik adalah tajuk yang paling</p><p>sukar manakala kaedah pembelajaran berasaskan permainan menjadi pilihan 62.2%</p><p>pelajar. Fasa kedua kajian iaitu reka bentuk dan pembangunan PhyKER Games</p><p>melibatkan seramai tiga orang pakar bagi mendapatkan kesahan kandungan. Dapatan</p><p>menunjukkan PhyKER Games mempunyai kesahan kandungan yang memuaskan</p><p>dengan nilai Indeks Kesahan Kandungan 0.95. Bagi menguji kebolehgunaan dan</p><p>kebolehlaksanaan PhyKER Games instrumen yang digunakan ialah soal selidik yang</p><p>diadaptasi daripada instrumen sedia ada. Dapatan menunjukkan PhyKER Games</p><p>mempunyai kebolehlaksanaan dan kebolehgunaan yang baik dengan peratus</p><p>persetujuan antara pengguna melebihi 75%. Bahagian terakhir kajian ialah fasa</p><p>penilaian kesan penggunaan PhyKER Games. Dapatan menunjukkan bahawa terdapat</p><p>perbezaan yang signifikan antara pencapaian skor pelajar dalam kumpulan rawatan</p><p>(n=30, M = 66.58, SD = 11.587) melalui ujian-t sampel bebas dengan nilai t (58) = -</p><p>5.960, p = 0.000, dengan pelajar dalam kumpulan kawalan (n=30, M = 50.92, SD =</p><p>8.547). Analisis korelasi Pearson dengan nilai r=0.82 menunjukkan terdapat hubungan</p><p>yang kuat dan signifikan antara motivasi menggunakan PhyKER Games dengan skor</p><p>pencapaian pascaujian. Kesimpulannya, kajian ini berjaya membangunkan sebuah</p><p>permainan pendidikan dalam tajuk Litar Elektrik yang berkesan dalam meningkatkan</p><p>pencapaian dan motivasi pelajar. Implikasinya, PhyKER Games boleh dijadikan</p><p>sebagai rujukan kepada guru sebagai contoh permainan yang berkesan dan oleh itu</p><p>boleh dimanfaatkan dalam pembelajaran berasaskan permainan. Selain itu, PhyKER</p><p>Games boleh menjadi panduan bagi penyelidik dan guru bagi membangunkan</p><p>permainan serupa bagi tujuan pengajaran dan pembelajaran.</p> 2021 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=8510 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=8510 text zsm closedAccess Doctoral Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Sains dan Matematik <p>Adams, E., & Dormans, J. (2012). Game Mechanics: Advanced Game Design. Berkeley CA:</p><p>Pearson Education. Retrieved from http://www.amazon.com/Game-Mechanics-</p><p>Advanced-Design-Voices/dp/0321820</p><p></p><p>Agus Budiyono, Moh. Afiful Hair, Arin Wildani, dan Firdausiyah. (2020). Pengaruh learning</p><p>cycle 5e berbantuan permainan monopoli fisika berpoin (mokain) terhadap</p><p>penguasaan konsep peserta didik SMA. EduSains: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains &</p><p>Matematika, Vol.8 No.2 (pp 22-31)</p><p></p><p>Aiko Sato, Jonathan de Haan. (2016). Applying an Experiential Learning Model to the</p><p>Teaching of Gateway Strategy Board Games. International Journal of Instruction;</p><p>Vol.9, No.1 e-ISSN: 1308-1470. www.e-iji.net p-ISSN: 1694-609X.</p><p></p><p>Akademi Sains Malaysia (2015). Penilaian perlaksanaan projek rintis Pendidikan sains</p><p>berasaskan amalan inkuiri di empat buah sekolah rendah di Daerah Ulu Langat.</p><p>Perpustakaan Negara Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Akbari, R, & Yazdanmehr, E. (2014). A Critical Analysis of the Selection Criteria of expert</p><p>Teachers in ELT. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, Vol. 4, No. 8, pp, 1653-</p><p>1658.</p><p></p><p>Alberta Education. (2007). Diploma Examinations Program: View Results by Table Retrieved</p><p>from: Alberta Education web site:</p><p>http://www.education.alberta.ca/media/735785/table.pdf</p><p></p><p>All, A., Nuez Castellar, P. E., & Looy, J. Van. (2014). Measuring Effectiveness in Digital</p><p>Game-Based Learning: A Methodological Review. International Journal of Serious</p><p>Games, 1(2), 321.</p><p></p><p>Anderson, C.A. & Dill, K.E. (2004). Video games and aggressive thoughts, feelings and</p><p>behavior in the laboratory and in life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,</p><p>Vol.78, No.4, pp.772-790.</p><p></p><p>Andika, W. D., Akbar, M., Yufiarti, Sumarni, S. (2019). Playing board games with</p><p>mathematical self-concept to support early numeracy skill of 5-6 years old children.</p><p>Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1166, 12019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-</p><p>6596/1166/1/012019 Google Scholar</p><p></p><p>Anshel, M. H. (2003). Sport psychology: From theory to practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ:</p><p>Pearson Education.</p><p></p><p>Apostol, S., Zaharescu, L., & Aleze, I. (2013). Gamification of learning and educational</p><p>games. eLearning & Software for Education, 2, pp.67.</p><p></p><p>Ary, D., Jacobs, L.C., & Razavieh, A. (2002). Introduction to research in education. Belmont,</p><p>CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.</p><p></p><p>Australian Commications and Media Authority. (2013). Report 3-Smartphones and tablets.</p><p>Canberra.</p><p></p><p>Awan, R.U.N., Noureen, G. & Naz, A. (2011). A study of relationship between achievement motivation,</p><p>self-concept and achievement in English and Mathematics at secondary level. International Education</p><p>Studies 4(3): 72-79.</p><p></p><p>Azizi Yahaya, Gooh, M.L., Halimah Maalip (2014). Pengaruh media berunsur agresif dan kesannya</p><p>terhadap tingkah laku pelajar di sekolah menengah. National Action Research Conference 2014,</p><p>Official Conference Proceeding, Melaka, 25-26 Jun 2014.</p><p></p><p>Bandura, A. 1994. Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior,4. New</p><p>York: Academic Press, pp. 71-81.</p><p></p><p>Banfield, J., & Wilkerson, B. (2014). Increasing student intrinsic motivation and self-efficacy</p><p>through gamification pedagogy. Contemporary Issues in Education Research CIER, 7(4), pp.291.</p><p></p><p>Baser, M. (2006). Promoting Conceptual Change through Active Learning Using Open Source Software</p><p>for Physics Simulations. Australasian Journal of Educational</p><p></p><p>Berliner, C. David. (2001). Expert Teachers: Their characteristics, development and</p><p>accomplishments, Ponencies De La Teoria A Laula, 13-28.</p><p></p><p>Bernard, L. C., & Krupat, E. (1994). Health Psychology: Biopsychosocial Factors in Health and</p><p>Illness. New York: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.</p><p></p><p>Bilal E, Erol M. (2009). Investigating Students Conceptions of Some Electricity Concepts.</p><p>Lat. Am. J. Phys. Educ. 3 (2). pp.193-201.</p><p></p><p>Blamire, R. (2010). Digital Games for Learning: Conclusions and recommendations from the IMAGINE</p><p>project. European Schoolnet. Lifelong Learning Program.</p><p></p><p>Boopathiraj, C. (2013). Analysis of Test Items on Difficulty Level and Discrimination Index in the</p><p>Test for Research in Education. International Journal of Social Science & Interdisciplinary</p><p>Research, 2(2), 189193.</p><p></p><p>Boyle, S. (2011). An Introduction to Games based learning. UCD Teaching and Learning Resources.</p><p>https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1215.Do-it-yourself</p><p></p><p>Campbell, D.T. & Stanley, J.C. 1963. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for</p><p>Research. Chicago: Rand Mnally College Publishing Company.</p><p></p><p>Cardinot, A., Fairfield, J. A. (2019). Game-based learning to engage students with Physics</p><p>and Astronomy using a board game. International Journal of Game-Based Learning</p><p>(IJGBL), 9(1), 4257. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJGBL.2019010104</p><p></p><p>Chazbeck, B. & Ayoubi, Z. (2018). Resources used by Lebanese secondary physics teachers'</p><p>for teaching electricity: Types, objectives and factors affecting their selection. Journal</p><p>of Education in Science, Environment and Health (JESEH), 4(2), (p.118-128).</p><p></p><p>Choi, E., & Park, J. (2003). Conditions for the Effective Use of Simulation and Its</p><p>Application to Middle-School Physics Inquiry Activities, 42(3), 318324.</p><p></p><p>Christiane, Giselle, Raul, Giani, Fernando, M. Nathalie, Jean. (2018). SplashCode-A Board</p><p>Game for Learning an Understanding of Algorithms in Middle School. Journal</p><p>Informatics in Education, 2019, Vol. 18, No. 2, (p.259280). Vilnius University.</p><p></p><p>Chua Yan Piaw. (2006). Kaedah dan Stitistik Penyelidikan. Buku 1. Asas Statistik</p><p>Penyelidikan. Mc Graw Hill. Kuala Lumpur.</p><p></p><p>Chu H.C. & Hwang G.J. (2008). A Delphi-based approach to developing expert systems with</p><p>the cooperation of multiple experts. Expert Systems with Applications 2008 ; 34 : 28 26-</p><p>40.</p><p></p><p>Clark, R.C. & Mayer, R.E. (2008). Learning by Viewing Versus Learning by Doing:Evidence-</p><p>Based Guidelines for principled Learning Environments. Performance Improvement.</p><p>47, 5-13.</p><p></p><p>College Station (2001). ADDIE instructional design model. Texas Copyright 2001 LOT</p><p>All rights reserved. L:\htms\training\handouts\pf_files\addie.doc. Published on</p><p>01/23/01.</p><p></p><p>Cox, R. H. (2007). Sport psychology: Concepts and applications. New York, NY: McGraw-</p><p>Hill.</p><p></p><p>Creswell, J.W. (2008). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating</p><p>Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Edisi ke-3. NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.</p><p></p><p>Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating</p><p>quantitative and qualitative research. Educational Research (Vol.4). Boston: Pearson.</p><p>https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004</p><p></p><p>David Devries & Keith Edwards. (1974). Teams-Games-Tournament: A research review.</p><p>Journal of Research and Development in Education 1978122838.</p><p></p><p>DeVries D L, Mescon IT, Shackman SL. (1975). Teams-Games-Tournament in Elementary</p><p>Classroom: A Replication (Tech.Rep.No.190). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University,</p><p>Center for Social Organization of Schools.</p><p></p><p>Donovan T. (2017). Its all a game: The history of board games from Monopoly to Settlers of</p><p>Catan. Thomas Dunne Books.</p><p></p><p>Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013).</p><p>Improving students learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions</p><p>from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public</p><p>Interest, Supplement, 14(1), 458. https://doi.org/10.1177/152910061245326</p><p></p><p>Dady Mukti Prabowo. (2018). Development of 3dimensional Diorama in The Natural Science</p><p>Learning Especially Lesson of Ekosistem for Grade V Students. Elem. Sch. Teach., Vol.</p><p>2, No. 2.</p><p></p><p>Dziob, D. (2020). Board Game in Physics Classes-a Proposal for a New Method of Student</p><p>Assessment. Res Sci Educ 50, 845862. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9714-y</p><p></p><p>Elesar V Malicoban, Judylee F Bulado, Anton A Soriano, Aireen Babe L Monte, Ivy Claire V</p><p>Mordeno. (2019). Development of a STEM board game electriciladders for grade 8</p><p>students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2nd International Annual Meeting on</p><p>STEM education (I AM STEM).</p><p></p><p>Ellwood M. (2018). Wall Streets latest secretive trend? Board game nights: This fraternitylike</p><p>network of players is more Snakes & Ladders than Skull & Bonesbut no less</p><p>well positioned. Bloomberg.</p><p>https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-04-26/wall-street-s-latest-trend-innetworking-</p><p>board-game-nights</p><p></p><p>Engerhardt PV, Beichner RJ. (2004). Students Understanding of Direct Current Resistive</p><p>Electrical Circuits. Am. J. Phys. 72 (1) pp.98-115.</p><p></p><p>Eun-Seok Cha, K. H. (2007). Translation of scales in cross-cultural research:issues and</p><p>techniques. Jan Research Methodology, 386-395.</p><p></p><p>Fatin Aliah Pang, Mohd Salleh Abu, Mohammad Bilal Ali & Salmiza Salleh. (2012). Faktor</p><p>penyumbang kepada kemerosotan penyertaan pelajar dalam aliran Sains: Satu analisis</p><p>sorotan tesis. Dibentangkan diSeminar Majlis Dekan Pendidikan IPTA 2012, 7 - 9</p><p>October 2012, TheZon Regency, Johor Bahru, Johor. Dimuat turun pada 2 Februari</p><p>2014 dari http://eprints.utm.my/28550.</p><p></p><p>Foster, A. N., & Koehler, M. J. (1997). Game-Based Learning of Physics Content The</p><p>Effectiveness of a Physics Game for Learning Basic Physics Concepts.</p><p></p><p>Fraenkel, J.R., & Wallen, N.E. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in ducation. New</p><p>York: McGraw-Hill.</p><p></p><p>Gagne, R. M. (1985). The Conditions of Learning. 4th. Ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart and</p><p>Winston.</p><p></p><p>Gagn, R.M. 1968. Learning hierarchies. Educational Psychologist 6: 19.</p><p></p><p>Gagn, R.M. 2000. Learning hierarchies. Dlm. Richey, R. (pnyt.). The legacy of Robert</p><p></p><p>Gagn, pp. 63-84. Syracuse: ERIC Clearinghouse on Instructional Technology.</p><p></p><p>Gagn, R.M., Briggs, L.J. & Wager, W.W. 1992. Principles of Instructional Design. Edisi ke-</p><p>4. New York: Harcourt Brace.</p><p></p><p>Gagn, R.M., Wager, W.W., Golas, K.C. & Keller, J.M. (2005). Principles of Instructional</p><p>Design. Edisi ke-5. USA: Thomson Wadsworth.</p><p></p><p>Garris, R., Ahlers, R., & Driskell, J. E. (2002). Games, Motivation, and Learning: A Research</p><p>and Practice Model. Simulation & Gaming, 33(4), 441467.</p><p>https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878102238607</p><p></p><p>Gay,L.R. dan Airasian. (2006). Educational Research. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.</p><p></p><p>Granic, I., Lobel, A., & Engels, R. C. M. E. (2014). The benefits of playing video games. The</p><p>American Psychologist, 69(1), 6678. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034857</p><p></p><p>Gustafson, K. L., & Branch, R. M. (2007). What is instructional design? Dalam Reiser, R. A.,</p><p>& Dempsey, J. V. (Editor), Trends and issues in intructional design and technology,</p><p>(ms. 10-16). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.</p><p></p><p>Efe. (2017). The effects of using diorama on 7th grade students academic achievement and</p><p>science learning skills. Asia-Pacific Forum Sci. Learn. Teach., Vol. 18, no. 1.</p><p></p><p>Halim, L., Yong, T.K. & Meerah. (2014). Overcoming Students Misconceptions on Forces in</p><p>Equilibrium: An action Research Study. Creative Education, 5, 1032-1042.</p><p></p><p>Handhika J, Cari, Suparmi, Sunarno W. (2015). External Representation to Overcome</p><p>Misconception in Physics. International Conference on Mathematics, Science, and</p><p>Education. pp 34-37.</p><p></p><p>Hanus, M., & Fox, J. (2015). Assessing the effects of gamification in the classroom: A</p><p>longitudinal study on intrinsic motivation, social comparison, satisfaction, effort, and</p><p>academic performance. Computers & Education, 80, 152161.</p><p></p><p>Hartley, J. & Davies, I.K. 1976. Preinstructional strategies: The role of pretest, behavioral</p><p>objectives, overview and advance organizers. Review of Educational Research 46: 239-</p><p>265.</p><p></p><p>Hays, R. T. (2005). The Effectiveness of instructional Games: A Literature Review and</p><p>Disscussion. Orlando.</p><p></p><p>Henderson, D. (2005). Games: Making Learning Fun. Annual Review of Nursing Education, 3.</p><p>pp. 165-183.</p><p></p><p>Horsley, T. L. (2010). Education Theory and Classroom Games: Increasing Knowledge and</p><p>Fun in the Classroom. The Journal of Nursing Education, 49(6). pp.363-364.</p><p></p><p>Hoy, B. (2018). Teaching history with custom-built board games. Simulation & Gaming,</p><p>49(2), 115133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878118763624</p><p></p><p>Hussain NH, Latiff LA, Yahaya N. (2012). Alternative Conception about Open and short</p><p>Circuit Concept. Procedia Social and Behavior Science.</p><p></p><p>Institut Aminuddin Baki. (2017). Panduan Perlaksanaan Pendidikan Abad ke 21. Kementerian</p><p>Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Jaakkola, T., & Nurmi, S. (2008). Fostering elementary school students understanding of</p><p>simple electricity by combining simulation and laboratory activities. Journal</p><p>ofComputer Assisted Learning, 24(4), 271283.</p><p></p><p>Jackson, S.L. (2003). Research Methods and Statistics: A Critical Thinking Approach. USA:</p><p>Thomson Wadsworth.</p><p></p><p>Jamalludin, H., Baharuddin, A., & Zaidatun, T. (2001). Pembangunan Perisian Multimedia</p><p>Satu Pendekatan Sistematik . Kuala Lumpur: Venton Publishing.</p><p></p><p>Jen-Che Tsai, Shih-Yeh Chen, Chun-Yen Chang and Shiang-Yao Liu. (2020). Element</p><p>Enterprise Tycoon: Playing Board Games to Learn Chemistry in Daily Life. Education</p><p>Sciences (ISSN 2227-7102).</p><p></p><p>Joseph, F. H., G Tomas, M. H., Christian, M. R., & Marko, S. (2014). A Primer on Partial</p><p>Least Square Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM). SAGE Publications.</p><p></p><p>Julio Cesar Queiroz de Cavalho, Leila Maria Beltramini & Nelma Regina Segnini</p><p>Bossolan (2019). Using a board game to teach protein synthesis to high school</p><p>students. Journal of Biological Education, 53:2, 205-206</p><p>DOI: 10.1080/00219266.2018.1469532</p><p></p><p>Kapp, K.M. (2012). The Gamification of Learning and Instruction. Game-Based Method and</p><p>Strategies for Training and Education. San Francisco:Pfeiffer</p><p></p><p>Kelly Damron. (2019). Using Board Games to Engage Non interested Students In Accounting</p><p>Classes. Journal of Instructional Research. Vol. 8, No 2, (p.93-96). Grand Canyon</p><p>University.</p><p></p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (2013). Modul Kursus Peningkatan Profesionalisme Guru</p><p>Sains, Pedagogi sains Abad 21.</p><p></p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2017). Laporan Tahunan 2016 PPPM 2013-2025. Pelan</p><p>Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2015, 1, 100108.</p><p></p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2016). Buku Penerangan Kurikulum Standard Sekolah</p><p>Menengah (KSSM). Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum, Putrajaya.</p><p></p><p>Kerby., M.C., MacDonald, A., McDonald, J., Baguley, M. (2017). The museum diorama:</p><p>Caught between art and history, Australian Art Education, Vol. 38, No. 2, (p.261-274).</p><p></p><p>Kerlinger, F. N. (1979). Foundations of behavioral research. Ed. ke-2. New York: Holt</p><p>Rinehart & Winston.</p><p></p><p>Khairul Hasni A.K, Norazah Mohd Nordin & AMP, Zanaton Iksan. (2015). Analisa keperluan</p><p>awal pembangunan modul sains (e-SMART) berasaskan pendekatan konstruktif 5E dan</p><p>analogi terhadap penerapan kemahiran berfikir kreatif murid. Persidangan Seminar</p><p>Kebangsaan Pendidikan Negara Siri (SKepen).</p><p></p><p>Khairun, N. M. A. (2007). Kesan Pembelajaran Berasaskan Inkuiri (PBI) Melalui Web</p><p>Terhadap Prestasi dan Persepsi Pelajar Dalam Mata Pelajaran Fizik Peringkat</p><p>Universiti. Pulau Pinang: Universiti Sains Malaysia</p><p></p><p>Kim, J., Park, S., Lee, H., & Lee, H. (2005). Correcting Misconception Using Unrealistic</p><p>Virtual Reality Simulation in Physics Education. Recent Research Development in</p><p>Learning Technologies, 15.</p><p></p><p>Koba S, Mitchell TC. (2011). Hard-to-Teach Science Concepts: A Framework to Support</p><p>Learners, Grades 35. NSTA PRESS, 2011, pp. 5-6</p><p></p><p>Kocukozer H, Kocakulah S. (2008a) Secondary School Students Misconceptionn about</p><p>Simple Electric Circuits. Journal of Turkish Science Education. 4 (1). pp. 101-115</p><p></p><p>Kocukozer H, Kocakulah S. (2008b) Effect of simple Circuits Teaching on Conceptual</p><p>Change in Grade Physics Course. Journal of Turkish Science Education. 5 (1). pp. 59-</p><p>74</p><p></p><p>Krejcie, R.V. & Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities.</p><p>Educational and Psychological Measurement. 30 (3) 607-610.</p><p></p><p>Larson, M. B., & Lockee, B. B. (2014). Streamlined ID: A practical guide to instructional</p><p>design. Oxon: Routledge.</p><p></p><p>Lazarro, N. (2004). Why we play games: Four keys to more emotion without story. Retrieved</p><p>January 20, 2014, from http://xeodesign.com/xeodesign_whyweplaygames.pdf</p><p></p><p>Lazarus, R.S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, Appraisal and Coping. New York: Guilford.</p><p></p><p>Lee, T.T. & Kamisah Osman. 2010b. Pembinaan Modul Multimedia Interaktif dengan Agen</p><p>Pedagogi (IMMPA) dalam Pembelajaran Elektrokimia: Analisis Keperluan. Prosiding</p><p>Kolokium Kebangsaan Pasca Siswazah Sains & Matematik 2010. (p. 25).</p><p></p><p>Lund, A.M. (2001). Measuring usability with the USE questionnaire, STC Usability SIG</p><p>Newsletter, 8(2).</p><p></p><p>Lyn.M.R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research,</p><p>35(6).</p><p></p><p>Makki, M.H., Abd-El-Khalick, F. & Boujaoude, S. (2003). Lebanese Secondary school</p><p>student environmental knowledge and attitude. Environmental Education Research,</p><p>9(1), 21-33.</p><p></p><p>McCowan, R. J., & McCowan, S. C. (1999). Item Analysis for Criterion-Referenced Tests.</p><p>Online Submission. Retrieved from</p><p>http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/recordDetail?accno=ED501716.</p><p></p><p>McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2012). Conducting educational design research. New York:</p><p>Routledge.</p><p></p><p>McKillip, J. (1987). Need Analysis: Tools for the Human Service and Education. Applied</p><p>Social Research Methods Series, Volume 10. Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA.</p><p></p><p>Mehrens, W. A., & Lehmann, I. J. (1991). Measurement and Evaluation in Education and</p><p>Psychology (4th ed.). Wadsworth Publishing.</p><p></p><p>Mohamad, A.R., dan Nurhafiza M. (2011). Persepsi Pelajar-Pelajar Institut Kemahiran Mara</p><p>(IKM) Terhadap Proses Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran Program Sijil Teknologi</p><p>Elektrik Domestik Dan Industri Yang Sedang Mereka Ikuti. Journal of Technical,</p><p>Vocational & Engineering Education. 2 (2011), 50-63.</p><p></p><p>Mohd Majid Konting (2005). Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan</p><p>Bahasa & Pustaka.</p><p></p><p>Mohd. Majid Konting. (2009). Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan (cetakan ke-8). Kuala</p><p>Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka (Cetakan asal diterbitkan pada 1990).</p><p></p><p>Mohd Nor Izwan Sulaiman. (2008). Teori, strategi dan perkaedahan dalam pendidikan.</p><p>http://mohdnorizwansulaiman.blogspot.com/2008/10/teori-strategi dan-perkaedahandalam.</p><p>html [2 Oktober 2009]</p><p></p><p>Morgan, W. P. (1972). Hypnosis and muscular performance. In W. P. Morgan (ed.),</p><p>Ergogenic aids and muscular performance. pp. 193-233. New York, NY: Academic</p><p>Press.</p><p></p><p>Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., & Kemp, J. E. (2007). Designing Effective Instruction (5th ed.).</p><p>United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</p><p></p><p>Nadia Ayub. (2010). Effect of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on academic performance.</p><p>Pakistan Business Review 363-372.</p><p>http://www.iobm.edu.pk/PBR/PBR_1007_363_The%20Effect%20of%20Inrin</p><p>sic%20and%20Extrinsic%20Motivation%20revise.pdf [27 Mac 2012</p><p></p><p>Nadrah, Ismail Tolla, Muhammad Sidin Ali & Muris. (2017). The Effect of Cooperative</p><p>Learning Model of Teams Games Tournament (TGT) and Students Motivation toward</p><p>Physics Learning Outcome. International Education Studies; Vol. 10, No. 2, (p.123-</p><p>130). ISSN 1913-9020 E-ISSN 1913-9039.</p><p></p><p>Nazli Yahya (2002). Development and Evaluation of Web-Based Learning Systems for Re-</p><p>Conceptualization: Basic Electric Circuit. Unpublished Dissertation, PhD. University</p><p>Teknologi Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Needham, R. 1987. CLIS in the Classroom: Teaching Strategies for Developing Understanding</p><p>in Science. Leeds: University of Leeds.</p><p></p><p>Nitko, A. J. (2004). Educational Assessment of Students (4th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson/Merill</p><p>Prentice Hall.</p><p></p><p>Noraini. (2013). Penyelidikan dalam pendidikan. Mc Graw Hill. Kuala Lumpur.</p><p></p><p>Norfaridatul Akmar Hasim (2019). Pendekatan Permainan Media Diorama Dalam</p><p>Meningkatkan Pencapaian Dan Minat Pelajar Dalam Mata Pelajaran Fizik Tingkatan</p><p>Lima. Seminar Amalan Terbaik IBSE Peringkat Negeri Wilayah Persekutuan</p><p>Putrajaya.12 Oktober 2019, Kuala Lumpur.</p><p></p><p>Norfaridatul A.H, Mustamam & Nurulhuda. (2019a). DDR (Design and Development</p><p>Research): Tajuk yang Sukar dan Kaedah yang Paling Digemari Dalam Mata Pelajaran</p><p>Fizik. In eProsiding Penulisan Ilmiah dan inovasi PAK21 Pendidik Malaysia (2019)</p><p>(p.206-209). Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. {eISBN 978-967-17774-0-4}.</p><p></p><p>Norfaridatul A.H, Mustamam & Nurulhuda. (2019b). PhyKER Games: Effect On Student</p><p>Motivations. In eProsiding Penulisan Ilmiah dan inovasi PAK21 Pendidik Malaysia</p><p>(2019) (p.204-205). Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. {eISBN 978-967-17774-0-4}.</p><p></p><p>Norfaridatul Akmar, Mustamam & Nurul Huda (2020). Aids in physics: Design And</p><p>Development. Momentum: Physics Education Journal 4 (2), 2020, (p. 57-63).</p><p>Indonesia. {ISSN: ISSN 2548-9135 (online), ISSN 2548-9127 (print) I doi:10.21067}</p><p>http://ejournal.unikama.ac.id/index.php/momentum/article/view/4432/2654</p><p></p><p>Norfaridatul Akmar Bt Hasim. (2020). Kesan Permainan Pendidikan Pembelajaran</p><p>Elektrik Terhadap Murid Sekolah Menengah. JurnalPPenyelididkan Pendidikan guru.</p><p>Volume 16 (2020), 15-23. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p>https://www.moe.gov.my/menumedia/media-cetak/penerbitan/jurnal/3872- jurnalpenyelidikan-</p><p>guru-jilid-16-2020/file</p><p></p><p>Norfaridatul Akmar, Mustamam & Nurul Huda (2017). The Effectiveness of PhyKER Games</p><p>on Students Achievement in Electric. In Proceeding 5nd International Postgraduate</p><p>Conference on Science and Mathematics 2014 (IPCSM17) and International</p><p>Conference on Science, Technology, Engineering And Mathematics 2017</p><p>(ICSTEM2017). 7-9 October 2017, UPSI Tanjung Malim, Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Norfaridatul Akmar, Mustamam & Nurul Huda (2015). Pembangunan Dan Penilaian</p><p>Pembelajaran Berasaskan Permainan Bagi Tajuk Litar Arus Terus. In Proceeding</p><p>National Research Seminar 2015 (p. 571-577). 9 May 2015, UPSI, Tanjung Malim,</p><p>Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Nuri Korganch, Cristina Miron, Adrian Dafinei, Stefan Antohe. (2015). The Importance of</p><p>Inquiry-Based Learning on Electric Circuit Models for Conceptual Understanding.</p><p>Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 191 pp.2463 2468.</p><p></p><p>ODwyer A. (2009). Prior Understanding of Basic Electrical Circuit Concept by First Year</p><p>Engineering Students. All-Ireland Society for Higher Education (AISHE) Conference,</p><p>NUI Maynooth.</p><p></p><p>Overmars, M. (2005). Learning object-oriented design by creating games. Potentials, IEEE,</p><p>23(5), 11-13.</p><p></p><p>Pallant, J. (2005). SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using SPSS</p><p>for Window (Version 12). Edisi ke-3. NSW: Allen & Unwin.</p><p></p><p>Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS Survival Manual: A Step By Step Guide to Data Analysis Using</p><p>SPSS Program (6th ed.). London, UK: McGraw-Hill Education.</p><p></p><p>Parker, J.C. (2007). Gender differences in the motivation to learn. Tesis Sarjana, The Evergreen</p><p>State College.</p><p></p><p>Peranti, Andik Purwanto & Eko Risdianto. (2019). Pengembangan media pembelajaran</p><p>permainan mofin (monopoli fisika sains) pada siswa SMA kelas x. Jurnal Kumparan</p><p>Fisika Vol. 2 No. 1 (pp. 41-48).</p><p></p><p>Pivec, M., Dziabenko, O., & Schinnerl, I. (2003). Aspect of Game-Based Learning. In</p><p>Proceeding of I-KNOW. Graz, Austria.</p><p></p><p>Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know whats</p><p>being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing and Health,</p><p>29(5), 489497. http://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147.</p><p></p><p>Prensky, M. (2001a). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1 6.</p><p>https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816.</p><p></p><p>Prensky, M. (2007). Digital games-based learning. New York: Paragon House</p><p>Purwanto & Anisa, J. (2016). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Teams Games</p><p>Tournament (TGT) Menggunakan Media Monopoli Terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika</p><p>Siswa Pada Materi Fluida Statis. Jurnal Ikatan Alumni Fisika Universitas Negeri</p><p>Medan, 2(2).</p><p></p><p>Purwanto, M., Sari, I. M., & Husna, H. N. (2012). Implementasi Permainan Monopoli Fisika</p><p>Sebagai Media Pembelajaran dalam Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe TGT untuk</p><p>Meningkatkan Prestasi Belajar dan Mengetahui Profil Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis</p><p>Siswa SMP. Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 17(1), pp.</p><p>69. https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v17i1.241</p><p></p><p>Qureshi, E. 2003. Instructional design models.</p><p>http://home.comcast.net/~elenaqureshi/IDModels.htm (24 September 2009).</p><p></p><p>Rahmayani & Sahyar (2018). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Teams Game</p><p>Tournament (TGT) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Pengetahuan Konseptual Fisika Siswa.</p><p>Jurnal Pendidikan FisikaVol.7,No1 (p.55-60) http://jurnal.unimed.55</p><p>ac.id/2012/index.php/jpf.</p><p></p><p>Ramlah Jantan & Mahani Razali. (2004). Psikologi Pendidikan Pendekatan Kontemporari.</p><p>Edisi Revisi. Kuala Lumpur: Mc Graw Hill (M) Sdn. Bhd.</p><p></p><p>Rebecca Yvonne Bayeck. (2020). Examining Board Gameplay and Learning: A</p><p>Multidisciplinary Review of Recent Research. Simulation & Gaming, Sage Journals</p><p>2020. Vol. 51, No 4, 2020 (p. 411-431). https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878119901286</p><p></p><p>Richie, R.C., & Klein, J.D. (2007). Design and Development Research. New Jersey:</p><p>Lawrence Erlbumm Associates, inc.</p><p></p><p>Rizwan Akram Rana & Nasir Mahmood. (2010). The relationship between test anxiety and</p><p>academic achievement. Bulletin of Education and Research 32(2): 63-74.</p><p></p><p>Ruhaizah Binti Abdullah. (2015). The use of simulations and games in teaching and learning</p><p>introductory physics: An overview. Tesis Master of Edu. University Pendidikan Sultan</p><p>Idris</p><p></p><p>Ryan, M.M. & Deci, E.L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and</p><p>new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology 25: 54-67.</p><p></p><p>Saedah Siraj, Norlidah Alias, Dorothy DeWitt & Zaharah Hussin. (2013). Design and</p><p>Development Research: Emergent Trend in Educational Research. Kuala Lumpur:</p><p>Pearson Malaysia Sdn Bhd.</p><p></p><p>ahin, K. & Ahmet, E. (2009). Predicting college students Mathematics anxiety by</p><p>motivational beliefs and self-regulated learning strategies. College Student Journal</p><p>43(2): 631-642.</p><p></p><p>Sahrir, M. S., Alias, N. A., Ismail, Z., & AMP; Osman. N. (2012). Employing design and</p><p>development research (DDR) approaches in the design and development of online</p><p>Arabic vocabulary learning games prototype. Turkish Online Journal of Educational</p><p>Technology, 11(2), 108119.</p><p></p><p>Sahyar & Kurniati, F. (2017). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif (TGT) Numbered</p><p>Heads Together (NHT) dengan Menggunakan Media Permainan Terhadap</p><p>Pengetahuan Konseptual Fisika Siswa SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 6(2).</p><p></p><p>Saleh Ahmed Al Khatib. (2010). Meta-cognitive self-regulated learning and motivational</p><p>beliefs as predictors of college students performance. International Journal for</p><p>Research in Education (IJRE) 27: 57-72.</p><p></p><p>Sanchez-Franco, M. J., & Roldn, J. L. (2010). Expressive aesthetics to ease perceived</p><p>community support: Exploring personal innovativeness and routinised behaviour as</p><p>moderators in Tuenti. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 14451457</p><p></p><p>Sarabando, C., Cravino, J. P., & Soares, A. A. (2014). Science Direct Contribution of a</p><p>computer simulation to students learning of the physics concepts of weight and mass.</p><p>Procedia Technology, 13, 112121.</p><p></p><p>Sari, A. M., & Gunawan, I. (2018). Developing Physics Monopoly Game Learning Media for</p><p>Light and Optical Devices. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 7(1), 7189.</p><p>https://doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v7i1.2564.</p><p></p><p>Schafer, W. (1996). Stress Management for Wellness. Orlando: Harcourt Brace.</p><p>Tunnicliffe & A. Scheersoi. (2015). Natural history dioramas: History, construction and</p><p>educational role. Nat. Hist. Dioramas Hist. Constr. Educ. Role. No. May (Pp. 1289).</p><p></p><p>Selye, H. (1982). The nature of stress. Retrieved</p><p>from http://www.icnr.com/articles/thenatureofstress.html</p><p></p><p>Serevina, V. (2009). Positive Influence between Outbound Activity in Physics Learning with</p><p>Student Studying Motivation. Jakarta: State University of Jakarta.</p><p></p><p>Setyani ND, Cari, Suparmi, Handhika J. (2017) Students Concept Ability of Newtons Law</p><p>Based on Verbal and Visual Test. International Journal of Science and Applied</p><p>Science: Conference Series, 1(2) pp. 162-169.</p><p></p><p>Shahril @ Charil Hj Marzuki. (2005). Amalan Pengajaran Guru yang Berkesan: Kajian di</p><p>Beberapa Sekolah Menengah di Malaysia. Retrieved from</p><p>www.ipbl.edu.my/BM/penyelidikan/seminarpapers/2005/shahrilUM.pdf</p><p></p><p>Shapiro, S. S., and Wilk, M. B. (1965), An analysis of variance test for normality (complete</p><p>samples), Biometrika 52, 591611.</p><p></p><p>Sidek Mohd Noah, & Jamaluddin Ahmad. (2005). Pembinaan modul: bagaimana membina</p><p>modul latihan dan modul akademik.Serdang: Universiti Putra Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Siti Nursaila (2017). Kesan permainan pendidikan terhadap pembelajaran hukum newton</p><p>pelajar sekolah menengah. Tesis Dr. Fal. Universiti Sains Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Smidt, S. (2010). Playing to learn: The role of play in early years. New York: Routledge.</p><p></p><p>Sornkhatha, P., & Srisawasdi, N. (2014). Supporting Conceptual Development in Newtons</p><p>Laws of Motion using an Interactive Computer-Simulated Laboratory Environment.</p><p>Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 20102014.</p><p></p><p>Stephen B. Shanklin and Craig R.Ehlen. (2017). Extending The Use and Effectiveness of The</p><p>Monopoly Board Game as An In-Class Economic Simulation Introductory Financial</p><p>Accounting Course. American Journal of Business Education, 2017. Vol. 10, No. 2,</p><p>(p.75-80). Teennessee State University, USA.</p><p></p><p>Sternberg, JR and Sternberg, K. (2011). Cognitive Psychology, six edition. Cengage Learning,</p><p>Canada, Wadsworth, pp. 107-108.</p><p></p><p>Stewart. J. & Haswell.K. (2013). Assessing readiness to work in primary health care: the</p><p>content validity of a self-check tool for physiotherapists and other health</p><p>professionals. Journal of Primary Health Care 5(1) 70 73.</p><p></p><p>Sudjana, Nana dan Ahmad Rivai. (2013). Media Pengajaran. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algesindo</p><p></p><p>Sundus, M. (2018). The Impact of Using Gadgets on Children. Journal of Depression and</p><p>Anxiety. 7(1). pp.1-3.</p><p></p><p>Sung, Y.T., Chang, K.E., &Lee, MD. (2008). Designing multimedia games for young childrens</p><p>taxonomic concept development. Computers and Education, 50 (3), 1037-1051.</p><p></p><p>Syifa Aulia Hakim dan Harlinda Syofyan (2017). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran</p><p>Kooperatif Tipe Teams Games Tournament (TGT) Terhadap Motivasi Belajar IPA Di</p><p>Kelas IV SDN Kelapa Dua 06 Pagi Jakarta Barat. International Journal of Elementary</p><p>Education. Vol.1 (4) pp. 249-263.</p><p></p><p>Tan, W. H. (2015). Gamifikasi Dalam Pendidikan Pembelajaran Berasaskan Permainan.</p><p>Tanjung Malim: Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.</p><p></p><p>Tan, W.H., Johnston-Wilder, S. & Neill, S. (2011). Game-based learning with dialogic</p><p>teaching approach: deep learning and the use of SporeTM in A-Level biology lessons.</p><p>In: Felicia, P., ed. Handbook of research on improving learning and motivation</p><p>through educational games: multidisciplinary approaches. Hershey: IGI Global, pp.</p><p>860-875.</p><p></p><p>Thaker, MN, Phadke, BN, Patel, PD. (2013). The Effects of Electrical Hazards. International</p><p>Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering. 3(9). 569-574.</p><p></p><p>Timmermann, D and Kautz, C. (2014). Investigating Student Learning of the Voltage and</p><p>Potential Concepts in Introductory Electrical Engineering. Frontiers in Education</p><p>Conference (FIE) Proceedings, Madrid, pp 1-4.</p><p></p><p>Ugur G, Dilber R, Senpolar Y, Duzgun B. (2012). The Effects Analogy on Students</p><p>Understanding of Direct Current Circuits and Attitudes toward Physics Lessons.</p><p>European Journal of Educational Research. 1 (2).pp.2011-223.</p><p></p><p>Kustiawan. (2018). The Development of Diorama Learning Media Transportation Themes to</p><p>Develop Language Skill Childrens Group B, Res. Educ. Media, Vol. 9, No. 2, (pp.</p><p>2631).</p><p></p><p>Ummu Husna. (2015). Reka bentuk dan pebangunan perisian permainan pendidikan pecahan</p><p>serta kajian keberkesanannya. Tesis Doktor Falsafah. Universiti Sains Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>V Tinedi, Yohandri and Djamas. (2018). How games are designed to increase students</p><p>motivation in learning Physics? A Literature Review. Materials Science and</p><p>Engineering 335. doi:10.1088/1757-899X/335/1/012065.</p><p></p><p>Wang, L.C., & Chen, M. P. (2010). The effect of game strategy and preference-matching on</p><p>flow experience and programming performance in game-based learning. Innovations</p><p>in Education and Teaching International, 47 (1), 39-52.</p><p></p><p>Wecker, M. (2016). The History and Future of the Once-Revolutionary Taxidermy Diorama.</p><p>Retrieved from https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science- nature/ode-oncerevolutionary-</p><p>taxidermy-display-180960707/ http://rgjmuseum.co.uk/our-story/theregiment/</p><p></p><p>Weinberg, R. S. & Gould, D. (1999). Foundations of sport and exercise psychology.</p><p>Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics</p><p></p><p>Whitelock, D., Taylor, J., OShea, T., Scanlon, E., Clark, P., & OMalley, C. (1993).</p><p>Challenging models of elastic collisions with a computer simulation, 20 (I).</p><p></p><p>Wigfield, A., Battle, A., Keller, L.B. & Eccles, J.S. (2002). Sex differences in motivation, selfconcept,</p><p>career aspiration and career choice: Implications for cognitive development.</p><p>Dlm. Mc Gillicuddy - DeLisi, A.V. & De Lisi, R. (pnyt.).</p><p></p><p>Woo, J.-C. (2014). Digital Game-Based Learning Support Student Motivation, Cognitive</p><p>Success and Performance Outcomes. Educational Technology & Society, 17 (3), 291-</p><p>307.</p><p></p><p>Woolfolk, A.E. (1998). Educational Psychology. Edisi ke-3. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.</p><p></p><p>Yaashinta. (2013). Penggunaan media diorama untuk peningkatan keterampilan menulis</p><p>karangan narasi pada siswa sekolah dasar. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Surabaya:</p><p>Universitas Negeri Surabaya.</p><p></p><p>Yam San Chee. (2011). Learning as becoming through performance, play, and dialogue: A</p><p>model of game-based learning with the game Legends of khimia. Digital Culture &</p><p>Education.</p><p>http://www.digitalcultureandeducation.com/uncategorized/dce1044_chee_2011_html/</p><p>[12 November 2013]</p><p></p><p>Yuenyong, C., Vel Marie C. Palisbo, Arlyn S. Pusta, Jonell B. Razo, Sotero O. Malayao, Jr.,</p><p>Ellen J. Castro, Neal Alfie Y. Lasta (2016). Development of a Board Game in</p><p>Teaching Direct Current Circuits. Proceeding of the 4th International Conference of</p><p>Science Educators and Teachers (ISET), Khon Kaen, Thailand: Science Education</p><p>Association (Thailand) (SEAT).</p><p></p><p>Zain F.M. (2009). Kesan Maklum Balas yang Berbeza Oleh Agen Pedagogi Dalam Sistem</p><p>Pengurusan Pembelajaran (SPP) Terhadap Pencapaian Murid yang Berbeza Lokus</p><p>Kawalan. Masters Thesis. Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang.</p><p></p><p>Zaleha, I., & Nurul Ashikin, S. (2010). Pembangunan Sistem Sokongan Pembelajaran Kendiri</p><p>Atas Talian (Transport). Pembangunan Sistem Sokongan pembelajaran Kendiri Atas</p><p>Talian (Transport), 15.</p><p></p><p>Zhu, Y. & Leung, F.K.S. 2011. Motivation and achievement: Is there an East Asian</p><p>model? International Journal of Science & Mathematics Education 9: 1189-1212.</p><p></p><p>Zulkifli Osman. (2013). Kebolehlaksanaan dan Kebolehgunaan Modul Pengajaran Bahasa</p><p>Berlandaskan Pendekatan Holistik. PENDETA: Journal of Malay Language, Education</p><p>and Literature, 4, 202-230.</p><p></p>

Similar Items