Pembangunan modul e-pentaksiran untuk Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) Kimia

Pembangunan modul e-pentaksiran untuk Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) Kimia

<p>Kajian ini bertujuan membangunkan modul e-pentaksiran untuk MOOC Kimia. Kajian ini merupakan kajian reka bentuk dan pembangunan. Responden kajian ini terdiri daripada 129 orang pelajar Ijazah Sarjana Muda Pendidikan Kimia yang telah dipilih secara rawak kelompok. Instrumen kajian ad...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nurfarihah Kamarudin
Format: thesis
Language:zsm
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=8576
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:8576
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
collection UPSI Digital Repository
language zsm
topic
spellingShingle
Nurfarihah Kamarudin
Pembangunan modul e-pentaksiran untuk Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) Kimia
description <p>Kajian ini bertujuan membangunkan modul e-pentaksiran untuk MOOC Kimia. Kajian ini merupakan kajian reka bentuk dan pembangunan. Responden kajian ini terdiri daripada 129 orang pelajar Ijazah Sarjana Muda Pendidikan Kimia yang telah dipilih secara rawak kelompok. Instrumen kajian adalah borang penilaian kesahan kandungan modul, soal selidik kebolehpercayaan modul dan soal selidik persepsi pelajar terhadap modul. Data yang diperoleh dikumpul dan dianalisis menggunakan Content Validity Index (CVI) bagi menilai kesahan kandungan modul. Kebolehpercayaan modul dianalisis dengan pekali kebolehpercayaan manakala persepsi pelajar terhadap modul dianalisis menggunakan nilai min persepsi. Hasil kajian menunjukkan nilai S-CVI/Ave yang diperoleh bagi 389 item dalam penilaian kesahan kandungan modul adalah 1.00. Seterusnya, nilai Cronbachs Alpha yang diperoleh bagi kebolehpercayaan modul adalah 0.98. Nilai min dan sisihan piawai bagi persepsi pelajar terhadap modul adalah 3.44 dan 0.59 masing-masing. Kesimpulannya nilai pekali kesahan, pekali kebolehpercayaan Cronbachs Alpha dan nilai min persepsi pelajar terhadap modul adalah baik. Implikasinya, penggunaan modul e-pentaksiran untuk MOOC Kimia ini dapat membantu pelajar menjalankan pentaksiran kendiri secara dalam talian, mengukuhkan pemahaman mereka dalam kursus kimia di samping membantu pensyarah mempelbagaikan kaedah pentaksiran.</p>
format thesis
qualification_name
qualification_level Master's degree
author Nurfarihah Kamarudin
author_facet Nurfarihah Kamarudin
author_sort Nurfarihah Kamarudin
title Pembangunan modul e-pentaksiran untuk Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) Kimia
title_short Pembangunan modul e-pentaksiran untuk Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) Kimia
title_full Pembangunan modul e-pentaksiran untuk Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) Kimia
title_fullStr Pembangunan modul e-pentaksiran untuk Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) Kimia
title_full_unstemmed Pembangunan modul e-pentaksiran untuk Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) Kimia
title_sort pembangunan modul e-pentaksiran untuk massive open online course (mooc) kimia
granting_institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
granting_department Fakulti Sains dan Matematik
publishDate 2020
url https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=8576
_version_ 1776104540815228928
spelling oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:85762023-01-06 Pembangunan modul e-pentaksiran untuk Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) Kimia 2020 Nurfarihah Kamarudin <p>Kajian ini bertujuan membangunkan modul e-pentaksiran untuk MOOC Kimia. Kajian ini merupakan kajian reka bentuk dan pembangunan. Responden kajian ini terdiri daripada 129 orang pelajar Ijazah Sarjana Muda Pendidikan Kimia yang telah dipilih secara rawak kelompok. Instrumen kajian adalah borang penilaian kesahan kandungan modul, soal selidik kebolehpercayaan modul dan soal selidik persepsi pelajar terhadap modul. Data yang diperoleh dikumpul dan dianalisis menggunakan Content Validity Index (CVI) bagi menilai kesahan kandungan modul. Kebolehpercayaan modul dianalisis dengan pekali kebolehpercayaan manakala persepsi pelajar terhadap modul dianalisis menggunakan nilai min persepsi. Hasil kajian menunjukkan nilai S-CVI/Ave yang diperoleh bagi 389 item dalam penilaian kesahan kandungan modul adalah 1.00. Seterusnya, nilai Cronbachs Alpha yang diperoleh bagi kebolehpercayaan modul adalah 0.98. Nilai min dan sisihan piawai bagi persepsi pelajar terhadap modul adalah 3.44 dan 0.59 masing-masing. Kesimpulannya nilai pekali kesahan, pekali kebolehpercayaan Cronbachs Alpha dan nilai min persepsi pelajar terhadap modul adalah baik. Implikasinya, penggunaan modul e-pentaksiran untuk MOOC Kimia ini dapat membantu pelajar menjalankan pentaksiran kendiri secara dalam talian, mengukuhkan pemahaman mereka dalam kursus kimia di samping membantu pensyarah mempelbagaikan kaedah pentaksiran.</p> 2020 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=8576 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=8576 text zsm closedAccess Masters Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Sains dan Matematik <p>Adams, C., Y. Yin, L. F. Vargas, M. & Mullen, C. S. (2014). A phenomenology of learning large: The tutorial sphere of xMOOC video lectures. Distance Education, 35, 202216.</p><p>Admiraal, W., Huisman, B. & Pilli, O. (2015). Assessment in Massive Open Online Courses. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 13, 207-216.</p><p>Aldoobie, N. (2015). ADDIE Model. American International Journal of Comtemporary Research, 5, 68-72.</p><p>Alshehri, F. (2015). The perceptions of MOOCs learners. Journal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information Science, 10, 550-552.</p><p>Anderson, S. A. (1994). Synthesis of research on mastery learning. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED 382 567). Diperolehi daripada https://files.eric.e d.gov/fulltext/ED382567.pdf</p><p>Anderson, L.W. (Ed.), Krathwohl, D.R. (Ed.), Airasian, P.W., Cruikshank, K.A., Mayer, R.E., Pintrich, P.R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M.C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Blooms Taxonomy of Eeducational objectives. New York: Longman.</p><p>Anderson, T. (2003). Modes of interaction in distance education: Recent developments and research questions. Dlm M. G. Moore, & W. G. Anderson (Eds). Handbook of distance education (ms. 129-144). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.</p><p>Babakus, E. & Mangold, W. G. (1992). Adapting the SERVQUAL scale to hospital services: An empirical investigation. Health Services Research, 6, 767-786.</p><p>Baharuddin Aris, Rio Sumarni Shariffudin & Manimegalai Subramaniam. (2002). Rekabentuk perisian multimedia (Edisi Pertama). Skudai: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.</p><p>Barbosa, H. & Garcia, F. (2005). Importance of online assessment in the e-learning process. ITHET 6th Annual International Conference, vol. F3B, 1-6.</p><p>Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83, 39-43.</p><p>Biggs, J.B. & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at university. (3rd Ed.). Maidenhead: McGraw Hill Education & Open University Press.</p><p>Bing T. P. J. (2013). Applying the UTAUT to understand factors affecting the uses of English e-learning websites in Taiwan. SAGE Open, 3, 1-12.</p><p>Bloom, B.S. & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals, by a committee of college and university examiners. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. NY: Longmans, Green.</p><p>Bloom, B. S. (1971). Mastery learning. Dlm J. H. Block (Ed.). Mastery learning: Theory and practice (ms. 4763). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.</p><p>Booth, R. & Berwyn, C. (2003). The development of quality online assessment in vocational education and training. Australian Flexible Learning Framework, 1, 1-17.</p><p>Charman, D. & Elmes, A. (1998). Formative assessment in a baste geographical I statistics module, eds. Computer based assessment (volume 2): Case studies in science and computing. Plymouth: SEED Publications, University of Plymouth.</p><p>Cheung, L. (2016). Using the ADDIE model of instructional design to teach chest radiography interpretation. Journal of Biomedical Education, vol 2016, 1-6.</p><p>Chua Y. P. (2006). Kaedah penyelidikan. Selangor: McGraw-Hill (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.</p><p>Chua Y. P. (2014). Kaedah penyelidikan (Edisi ketiga). Selangor: McGraw-Hill (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.</p><p>Clark, D. (1995). Why instructional system design? Diperolehi daripada http://www .nwlinkcom/~Donclark/hrd/sat1.html#model.</p><p>College, A (2001). Assessment essentials: Definition of terms. Diperolehi daripada http://depts.alverno.edu/saal/terms.html.</p><p>Creswell, J.W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (Edisi ketiga). NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.</p><p>Daniel, J., (2012). Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 3, 4-24.</p><p>Dick, W. & Reiser, R.A. (1989). Planning effective instruction. United States: Prentice Hall.</p><p>Dikli, S. (2003). Assessment at a distance: Tranditional vs. alternative assessment. The Turkish Online Journal of Education Technology-TOJET, 36, 5-25.</p><p>Donnelly, R. & Fitzmaurice, M. (2005). Designing modules for learning. Dlm G. O'Neill, S. Moore & B. McMullin (eds.) Emerging issues in the practice of university learning and teaching (ms 1-20). Dublin, All Ireland Society for Higher Education (AISHE).</p><p>Evans, C. & Gibbons, N. J. (2007). The interactivity effect in multimedia learning. Computers and Education, 49, 1147-1160.</p><p>Farah Nurshahira Zulkifli & Md Yusoff Daud. (2017). Transformasi pendidikan: Isu dan cabaran pendidikan abad ke-21 melalui aplikasi Massive Open Online Courses (MOOC) di Malaysia. Simposium Pendidikan diperibadikan: Perspektif Risalah An-Nur (SPRiN2017), Bangi, Malaysia.</p><p>Flavell, J. H. (1987). Speculation about the nature and development of metacognition. Dlm F. E. Warnert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation and understanding (ms. 21-29). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.</p><p>Garrison, D. R. (1997). Self-directed learning: Toward a comprehensive model. Adult Education Quarterly, 48, 18-33.</p><p>Genesee, F. (1994). Integrating language and content: Lessons from immersion. Educational Practice Report 11. McGill University: National Center for Research on Cultural Diversity and Second Language Learning.</p><p>Geoffrey, C., Jenny, W., Celia, T., Rosemary, C., Judithe, S., Margaret, H. & Joan, R. (2011). Teacher's handbook on e-assessment: A handbook to support teachers in using e-assessment to improve and evidence student learning and outcomes. Strawberry Hills, NSW: Australian Learning & Teaching Council.</p><p>Gill. D. & Lucas. D, (2013). Using alternative assessment in business and foreign language classes. Journal of International Education Research, 9, 359-370.</p><p>Grover, S., Franz P., Schneider E. & Pea, R. (2013). The MOOC as distributed intelligence: Dimensions of a framework & evaluation of MOOCs. Kertas kerja dibentangkan di 10th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, Madison, USA.</p><p>Guskey, T. R. (2005). Formative classroom assessment and Benjamin S. Bloom: Theory, research and implications. Kertas kerja dibentangkan di Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.</p><p>Guskey, T. R., & Pigott, T. D. (1988). Research on group-based mastery learning programs: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Research, 81, 197216.</p><p>Gustafson, K. L. & Branch, R. M. (2002). What is instructional design? Dlm R. A. Reiser & V. D. John. Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (ms. 17-23). New York: Pearson Education.</p><p>Hattie J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York, USA: Routledge.</p><p>Heritage, M. (2008). Learning progressions: Supporting instruction and formative assessment.Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.</p><p>Hudiya Adzhar, Fariza Khalid & Aidah Abdul Karim (2017). Penggunaan Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) sebagai kaedah pembelajaran baharu. Dlm Rohaila Mohamed Rosly, Nabila Atika Razali & Nur Atikah Jamilluddin. (Editor). Pembelajaran Abad ke-21: Trend integrasi teknologi (ms. 179-188). Bangi: Fakulti Pendidikan UKM.</p><p>Jackson, S.L. (2003). Research methods and statistics: A critical thinking approach. USA: Thomson Wadsworth.</p><p>Joint Information System Committee. (2007). Effective practice with e-sssessment (Third series). United Kingdom: JISC Publication.</p><p>Jones C. A. (2005). Assessment for learning. London: Learning and Skills Development Agency.</p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2011). Dasar e-pembelajaran negara (Institusi Pengajian Tinggi). Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2014). Garis panduan e-pembelajaran untuk Malaysia IPT. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2015a). Dasar e-Pembelajaran Negara 2.0. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2015b). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2015-2025 (Pengajian Tinggi). Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p>Khaira, H. G. & Yambo, D. (2005). The practicality of authentic assessment. Kertas kerja dibentangkan dalam First International Conference on Enhancing Teaching and Learning Through Assessment. Hong Kong Polytechnic University.</p><p>Kilgore, W. & Lowenthal, P. R. (2015). The human element MOOC. Student-Teacher Interaction in Online Learning Environments, 1, 373-391. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.4018/ 978-1-4666-6461-6.ch017.</p><p>Knowles, M. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. New York: Association Press. Diperolehi daripada https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED11 4653.</p><p>Kop, R. (2011). The challenges to connectivist learning on open online networks: Learning experiences during a Massive Open Online Course. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12, 19 38.</p><p>Kop, R., Fournier, H., & Mak, J. S. F. (2011). A pedagogy of abundance or a pedagogy to support human beings? Participant support on Massive Open Online Courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12, 74-93.</p><p>Krejcie, R. V. & Morgan D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610.</p><p>Lee, T.T. (2013). Pembinaan dan keberkesanan modul multimedia interaktif dengan agen pedagogi dalam pembelajaran elektrokimia. (Tesis Ijazah Doktor Falsafah yang tidak diterbitkan). Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi.</p><p>Lembaga Peperiksaan (2013). Pentaksiran kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi. Kuala Lumpur : Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p>Lim, C. H. (2007). Penyelidikan pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif dan kualitatif. Selangor: McGrawHill.</p><p>Lindsie, S. (2013). A new framework for Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). Journal of Adult Education, 42, 98-103.</p><p>Lindsay, P., & Norman, D. A. (1977). Human information processing: An introduction to psychology. United State of America: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.</p><p>Liyanagunawardena, T., Williams, S., & Adams, A. (2013) .The impact and reach of MOOCs: A developing countries perspective. Diperolehi daripada http://elearningeuropa.info/sites/default/files/asset/In-depth_33_1.pdf.</p><p>Logsdon, A. (2011). Alternative assessment-What is an alternative assessment? diperoleh daripada http://learningdisabilities.about.com/od/learningdisability termsA/g/a lternative_assessment.htm.</p><p>Lynn, M.R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35, 382385.</p><p>Mansor Fadzil, Latifah Abdol Latif, & Tengku Amina Munira Tengku Mohd Azzman Shariffadeen. (2015). MOOCs in Malaysia: A preliminary case study. Kertas kerja dibentang dalam E-ASEM forum: Renewing the lifelong learning agenda for the future, 10-11 Mac 2015, Bali, Indonesia.</p><p>Martell, K., & Calderon, T. (2005). Assessment of student learning in business schools: What it is, wherewe are, and where we need to go next. Dlm K. Martell & T. Calderon. Assessment of student learning in business schools: Best practices each step of the way (ms. 1-22). Tallahassee, Florida: Association for Institutional Research.</p><p>Meyer, G. R. (1988). Modules from design to implementation. (2nd ed). Manila: The Colombo Plan Staff For Technician Edu. Jon K Printing Co. Inc.</p><p>Miyazou, T. & Anderson, T. (2011). The Interaction Equivalency Theorem: Research potential and its application to teaching. The 27th Annual Distance Teaching & Learning. The Board of regents of the University of Wisconsin System.</p><p>Mohamed Amin Embi. (2010). Amalan, keberkesanan & cabaran perlaksanaan epembelajaran di IPT Malaysia. Putrajaya: Jabatan Pengajian Tinggi, Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi.</p><p>Mohd Sahandri Gani Hamzah, Laily Paim, Sharifah Azizah Haron & Mohd Faizal Nizam Lee Abdullah. (2013). Buku panduan pembinaan instrumen Anda dan Kepenggunaan. Tanjung Malim, Perak: Emeritus Publications.</p><p>Moore, M. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 2, 1-7.</p><p>Moore, J., Dickson-Deane, C., & Galyen, K. (2011). E-Learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same? The Internet and Higher Education, 14, 129-135.</p><p>Nicole A., More, B. & Ayodele, J. A. (2006). Best practice in assessment. Journal of Information Technology Education, 5, 251-269.</p><p>Nielsen, J. (2012). Usability 101: Introduction to usability. Diperolehi daripada https://www.nngroup.com/articles/usability-101-introduction-to-usability/</p><p>Noraini Idris. (2013). Penyelidikan dalam pendidikan. Selangor: McGraw-Hill (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.</p><p>Norazah Nordin, Helmi Norman & Mohamad Amin Embi. (2015). Technology acceptance of Massive Open Online Courses in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Distance Education, 17, 116.</p><p>Norazah Nordin, Helmi Norman, Mohamad Amin Embi, Ahmad Zamri Mansor & Fazilah Idris. (2016). Factors for development of learning content and task for MOOCs in an Asian context. Journal of International Educations Studies, 9, 48.61.</p><p>Norhapizah Mohd Burhan (2016). Penerimaan modul pembelajaran digital berasaskan strategi blended learning (e-CITAC) dalam kursus TITAS. The Online Journal of Islamic Education, 4, 1-16.</p><p>Orlich, D. C. Harder, R. J., Callahan, R. C., & Gibson, H. W. (2004). Teaching strategies: A guide to better instruction. New York: Houghton Mifflin.</p><p>Ormrod, J. E. (1999). Human learning (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.</p><p>Pappano, L. (2012). The year of the MOOC. The New York Times, ED26. Diperolehi daripada www.nytimes.com/2012/11/04/education/edlife/massive-open-online -co urses-aremultiplyingat-a-rapid-pace.html.</p><p>Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum. (2000). Pelaksanaan pembelajaran masteri dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran sains. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p>Quellmalz. E. S. (1985). Needed better methods for testing higher-order thinking skills. Journal of Department of Supervision and Curriculum Development, 43, 1-20.</p><p>Reeves, T. C. (2000). Alternative assessment approaches for online learning environments in higher education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 1, 101-111.</p><p>Reinbold, S. (2013). Using the ADDIE model in designing library instruction. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 3, 244-256.</p><p>Rhode, J. F. (2009). Interaction equivalency in self-paced online learning environments: An exploration of learner preferences. Interactional Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10, 1-23.</p><p>Richey R. (1986). Theoretical and conceptual bases of instructional design. New York: Nicols Publishing.</p><p>Rubiah Omar. (2009). Kesedaran, penilaian dan penerimaan e-pembelajaran dalam kalangan ahli akademik. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 34, 155-172</p><p>Russell, J.D. (1974). Modular instruction: A guide to the design, selection, utilization and evaluation of modular materials. United States: Publishing Company.</p><p>Rust, C. (2002). Purpose and principle of assessment. Learning and teaching briefing papers series 1-5. Diperolehi daripada Https://www.brookes.ac.uk/servic es/ocsld/resources/briefingpapers /p_p_assessment.pdf.</p><p>Saripah Salbiah Syed Abdul Azziz, Asmahani Ahmad Suhairun, Salihan Siais, Othman Talib, Nor Zuhaidah Mohamed Zain & Tengku Putri Norisah Tengku</p><p>Shariman (2013). Keberkesanan modul multimedia kimia organik: Mekanisme tindak balas SN1 dan SN2. Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education, 28, 53-68.</p><p>Schlepphege, J. (2009). The portfolio: An alternative assessment method in the foreign language classroom. Seminar paper of Pedagogy, Didactics, Literature Studies, grade: 1.0, University of Education Heidelberg.</p><p>Schmalz, R. (1973). Categorization of questions that mathematics teachers ask. The Mathematics Teacher, 7, 619-626.</p><p>Sidek Mohd Noah & Jamaludin Ahmad. (2005). Pembinaan modul: Bagaimana membina modul latihan dan modul akademik. Serdang: Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia.</p><p>Siemens, G. (2013). Massive Open Online Courses: Innovation in education? Dalam R. McGreal, W. Kinuthia, & S. Marshall (eds). Open educational resources: Innovation, research and practice, (ms. 5-16). Athabasca, Canada: Athabasca University Press.</p><p>Simkins, S., & Maier, M. (Eds.) (2010). Just-in-time teaching: Across the disciplines, across the academy. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.</p><p>Shuell, T. J. (1986). Cognitive conceptions of learning. Review of Educational Research, 56, 411436.</p><p>Sly, L & Rennie, L. (1999). Computer managed learning: Its use in formative as well as summative assessment. Kertas kerja dibentangkan dalam 3rd Annual CAA Conference, Loughborough University Citeseer.</p><p>Soares, L. (2011). The personalization of higher education: Using technology to enhance the college experience.Diperoleh drpd http://www.Americanprogress org/issues/labor/report/2011/10/04/10484/the-personalizationof-higher-educati on/.</p><p>Song. L & Hill, J.R. (2007). A conceptual model for understanding self-directed learning in online environments. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 6, 27-42.</p><p>Suen, H. K. (2014). Peer assessment for Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15, 312327.</p><p>Suppes, P. (1974). The place of theory in educational research. Educational Researcher, 3,310.</p><p>Trumbull, E., & Lash, A. (2013). Understanding formative assessment: Article of insights from learning theory and measurement theory. San Francisco: WestEd.</p><p>Vaughan N. (2013). Investigating how digital technologies can support a triad-approach for student assessment in higher education. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 3, 1-22.</p><p>Voss, B. D. (2013). Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs): A primer for university and college board members. Diperolehi daripada http://agb.org/sites/agb.org/ files/report_2013_MOOCs.pdf.</p><p>Waltz, C.F. & Bausell, R.B. (1981). Nursing research: Design, statistics, and computer analysis. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.</p><p>Yonas, A. (1977). Ten years after, review of perception: A cognitive-stage approach by R. H. Forgus & L. E. Melamed. Contemporary Psychology, 22, 687-689.</p>

Similar Items