Kesan aplikasi Plickers terhadap minat dan pencapaian pelajar dalam pembelajaran subjek sains tingkatan dua bagi topik ekosistem
<p>Kajian ini bertujuan mengukur kesan penggunaan aplikasi Plickers terhadap minat dan pencapaian pelajar dalam topik ekosistem bagi subjek Sains tingkatan dua di sebuah sekolah menengah di Ipoh. Reka bentuk kajian menggunakan kuasi-eksperimental dengan ujian pra dan ujian pasca. Dua j...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | thesis |
| Language: | zsm |
| Published: |
2020
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=8612 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| id |
oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:8612 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
uketd_dc |
| institution |
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| collection |
UPSI Digital Repository |
| language |
zsm |
| topic |
|
| spellingShingle |
Norhasimah Mohd Yusof Kesan aplikasi Plickers terhadap minat dan pencapaian pelajar dalam pembelajaran subjek sains tingkatan dua bagi topik ekosistem |
| description |
<p>Kajian ini bertujuan mengukur kesan penggunaan aplikasi Plickers terhadap minat dan pencapaian pelajar dalam topik ekosistem bagi subjek Sains tingkatan dua di sebuah sekolah menengah di Ipoh. Reka bentuk kajian menggunakan kuasi-eksperimental dengan ujian pra dan ujian pasca. Dua jenis instrumen yang digunakan ialah soal selidik untuk mengukur tahap minat pelajar terhadap aplikasi Plickers serta set soalan formatif ujian-pra dan ujian-pasca yang terdiri daripada 30 soalan aneka pilihan untuk mengukur pencapaian pelajar dalam topik ekosistem. Sampel kajian terdiri daripada dua kelas pelajar tingkatan dua (n=64) yang dipilih secara pensampelan bertujuan. Sampel diagihkan kepada dua kumpulan iaitu 32 orang responden kumpulan rawatan dan 32 orang responden kumpulan kawalan. Ujian pra telah dijalankan sebelum pengajaran dan pembelajaran bagi kedua-dua kumpulan. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan pencapaian ujian pra adalah lebih tinggi secara signifikan bagi kumpulan kawalan (M = 50.16, SD = 11.084) berbanding kumpulan rawatan (M = 44.50, SD = 9.37), t (62) = 2.09, p = .041. Seorang guru telah dilantik mengajar kedua-dua kumpulan. Kumpulan rawatan diajar dengan menggunakan teknologi aplikasi Plickers manakala kumpulan kawalan diajar dengan menggunakan kaedah tradisional. Kajian berlangsung selama enam minggu dan diikuti dengan ujian pasca. Ujian-t digunakan untuk mendapatkan nilai min, sisihan piawai dan signifikan kajian. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan pencapaian ujian pasca adalah lebih tinggi secara signifikan bagi kumpulan rawatan (M = 62.56, SD = 16.394) berbanding kumpulan kawalan (M = 55.16, SD = 10.836), t (62) = -2.132, p = .037. Perbezaan min pencapaian di antara dua kumpulan ialah sebanyak 7.4 mata. Wujud perbezaan min secara signifikan dari segi pencapaian pelajar dalam ujian pasca bagi subjek Sains. Dapatan soal selidik menunjukkan skor min sebanyak 4.42 yang menunjukkan minat terhadap penggunaan aplikasi Plickers dalam subjek Sains. Secara kesimpulannya, kajian ini secara tidak langsung dapat membantu guru memperbaiki kaedah dan teknik pengajaran. Kajian ini memberi implikasi bahawa penggunaan aplikasi Plickers secara berterusan dapat meningkatkan keberkesanannya dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran Sains.</p> |
| format |
thesis |
| qualification_name |
|
| qualification_level |
Master's degree |
| author |
Norhasimah Mohd Yusof |
| author_facet |
Norhasimah Mohd Yusof |
| author_sort |
Norhasimah Mohd Yusof |
| title |
Kesan aplikasi Plickers terhadap minat dan pencapaian pelajar dalam pembelajaran subjek sains tingkatan dua bagi topik ekosistem |
| title_short |
Kesan aplikasi Plickers terhadap minat dan pencapaian pelajar dalam pembelajaran subjek sains tingkatan dua bagi topik ekosistem |
| title_full |
Kesan aplikasi Plickers terhadap minat dan pencapaian pelajar dalam pembelajaran subjek sains tingkatan dua bagi topik ekosistem |
| title_fullStr |
Kesan aplikasi Plickers terhadap minat dan pencapaian pelajar dalam pembelajaran subjek sains tingkatan dua bagi topik ekosistem |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Kesan aplikasi Plickers terhadap minat dan pencapaian pelajar dalam pembelajaran subjek sains tingkatan dua bagi topik ekosistem |
| title_sort |
kesan aplikasi plickers terhadap minat dan pencapaian pelajar dalam pembelajaran subjek sains tingkatan dua bagi topik ekosistem |
| granting_institution |
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| granting_department |
Fakulti Seni, Komputeran dan Industri Kreatif |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| url |
https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=8612 |
| _version_ |
1776104547079421952 |
| spelling |
oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:86122023-01-16 Kesan aplikasi Plickers terhadap minat dan pencapaian pelajar dalam pembelajaran subjek sains tingkatan dua bagi topik ekosistem 2020 Norhasimah Mohd Yusof <p>Kajian ini bertujuan mengukur kesan penggunaan aplikasi Plickers terhadap minat dan pencapaian pelajar dalam topik ekosistem bagi subjek Sains tingkatan dua di sebuah sekolah menengah di Ipoh. Reka bentuk kajian menggunakan kuasi-eksperimental dengan ujian pra dan ujian pasca. Dua jenis instrumen yang digunakan ialah soal selidik untuk mengukur tahap minat pelajar terhadap aplikasi Plickers serta set soalan formatif ujian-pra dan ujian-pasca yang terdiri daripada 30 soalan aneka pilihan untuk mengukur pencapaian pelajar dalam topik ekosistem. Sampel kajian terdiri daripada dua kelas pelajar tingkatan dua (n=64) yang dipilih secara pensampelan bertujuan. Sampel diagihkan kepada dua kumpulan iaitu 32 orang responden kumpulan rawatan dan 32 orang responden kumpulan kawalan. Ujian pra telah dijalankan sebelum pengajaran dan pembelajaran bagi kedua-dua kumpulan. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan pencapaian ujian pra adalah lebih tinggi secara signifikan bagi kumpulan kawalan (M = 50.16, SD = 11.084) berbanding kumpulan rawatan (M = 44.50, SD = 9.37), t (62) = 2.09, p = .041. Seorang guru telah dilantik mengajar kedua-dua kumpulan. Kumpulan rawatan diajar dengan menggunakan teknologi aplikasi Plickers manakala kumpulan kawalan diajar dengan menggunakan kaedah tradisional. Kajian berlangsung selama enam minggu dan diikuti dengan ujian pasca. Ujian-t digunakan untuk mendapatkan nilai min, sisihan piawai dan signifikan kajian. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan pencapaian ujian pasca adalah lebih tinggi secara signifikan bagi kumpulan rawatan (M = 62.56, SD = 16.394) berbanding kumpulan kawalan (M = 55.16, SD = 10.836), t (62) = -2.132, p = .037. Perbezaan min pencapaian di antara dua kumpulan ialah sebanyak 7.4 mata. Wujud perbezaan min secara signifikan dari segi pencapaian pelajar dalam ujian pasca bagi subjek Sains. Dapatan soal selidik menunjukkan skor min sebanyak 4.42 yang menunjukkan minat terhadap penggunaan aplikasi Plickers dalam subjek Sains. Secara kesimpulannya, kajian ini secara tidak langsung dapat membantu guru memperbaiki kaedah dan teknik pengajaran. Kajian ini memberi implikasi bahawa penggunaan aplikasi Plickers secara berterusan dapat meningkatkan keberkesanannya dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran Sains.</p> 2020 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=8612 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=8612 text zsm closedAccess Masters Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Seni, Komputeran dan Industri Kreatif <p>Abu Bakar Nordin. 1995. Penilaian Afektif. Kajang: Masa Enterprise.</p><p>Abu Bakar Nordin. 1987. Asas Penilaian Pendidikan. Petaling Jaya: Longman Malaysia Sdn. Bhd.</p><p>Ariffin, S. A., Sidek, S. F., & Mutalib, M. F. H. (2018). Preliminary Descriptive Insights into Student Generated Activities for STEM subjects through Mobile Learning in a Malaysian University Context. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(2), 523534. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i2/3962</p><p>Ariffin, S. A., Yatim, M. H. M., Bahrin, S., Ali, A. Z. M., Ibrahim, A. B., Firdaus, S., Idris, S. (2018). An Investigation of Student Experience of STEM Mobile Learning in a Local Malaysian University, International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (2018) 12(2), 3650.</p><p>Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum, K. P. M. (2016). Buku Penerangan Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Menengah (KSSM). Kementerian Pendidikan malaysia.</p><p>Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2012). Membudayakan Kemahiran Berfikir. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p>Barnello, K. G. (2017). Technology Professional Development: Investigating The Effectiveness Of technology Integration In Middle School Classrooms. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Delaware).</p><p>Bchtold, M. (2013). What Do Students Construct According to Constructivism in Science Education? Research in Science Education, 43(6), 24772496. doi:10.1007/s11165-013-9369-7</p><p>Beatty, I. (2004). Transforming student learning with classroom communication systems. Research Bulletin, 2004(3), 113.</p><p>Bergson-Shilcock, A. (2017). Congressional Briefing Highlights Effective Adult Education and Upskilling Policies, 21(2).</p><p>B, M. V. (2012). Science choices in Norwegian upper secondary school: What matters? Science Education, 96(1), 120.</p><p>Be, M. V., & Henriksen, E. K. (2013). Love it or leave it: Norwegian students motivations and expectations for post compulsory physics. Science Education, 97(4), 550573.</p><p>Brooks, J.G & Brooks, M.G. (1993). In Search of understanding the case for constructivist classrooms. Alexandria, VA : association for Supervision & Curriculum Development (ASCD)</p><p>Bucchi, M. & Trench, B. (2014). Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology. New York: Routledge.</p><p>Bunce, D., Flens, E., & Neiles, K. (2010). How long can students pay attention in class? A study of student attention decline using clickers. Journal of Chemical Education, 87, 1438-1443.</p><p>Bybee, R., & McCrae, B. (2011). Scientific literacy and student attitudes: perspectives from PISA 2006 science. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 7 26.</p><p>Chien, Y. T., Chang, Y. H., & Chang, C. Y. (2016). Do we click in the right way? A meta-analytic review of clicker-integrated instruction. Educational Research Review, 17, 1-18.</p><p>Cheah Phaik Kin, (1999). Kadar Penerimaan Internet di Kalangan Pelajar Universiti: Satu Kajian Kes di Universiti Sains Malaysia, Tesis Sarjana, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang.</p><p>Chng, L., & Gurvitch, R. (2018). Using Plickers as an Assessment Tool in Health and Physical Education Settings. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 89(2), 1925. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2017.1404510</p><p>Chorafas, D. N. (2011). Education and Employment in the European Union: The Social Cost if Business. England: Gower Publishing Ltd.</p><p>Damick, J. M. (2015). Implementing Technology in an Algebra Classroom. Thesis, 622. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.brockport.edu/ehd_theses</p><p>Demirkan, O., Gurisik, A. & Ozlem, A.K.I.N. (2017) Teachers Opinions About Plickers One of The Online assessment Tools. Educational Research and Practice, 476.</p><p>DiBlasi, H. (2013, November-December). Technology is changing the world and our classrooms. The 21st Century Classroom, 16-22.</p><p>Danielson, C. (2011). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching, (2nd ed). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.</p><p>Elmahdi, I., Al-Hattami, A., & Fawzi, H. (2018). Using Technology for Formative Assessment to Improve Students Learning, Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 17(2), 182188.</p><p>Ferdig, R., Blank, J., Kratcoski, A., & Clements, R. (2015). Using stereoscopy to teach complex biological concepts. Advances in Physiology Education, 39(3), 205-208.</p><p>Freeman, C. L. (2015). Technologies for Formative Assessment: Can Web Based Applications Transform the Allied Health Science Classroom and Improve Summative Assessment Outcomes. Technologies for Formative Assessment, 1 18.</p><p>Fortney, J. T., & Wells, M. R. (2017). Using Plickers to Enhance Student Learning in High School Biology.</p><p>Galbis Cdova, A., Mart Parre, J., & Currs Prez, R. (2017). Higher education students attitude towards the use of gamification for competencies development. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 13(1), 129-146.</p><p>Gunawardena, C. N., Hermans, M. B., Sanchez, D., Richmond, C., Bohley, M., & Tuttle, R. (2009). A theoretical framework for building online communities of practice with social networking tools. Educational Media International, 46(1), 3-16.</p><p>Gunn, E. (2014). Using Clickers to Collect Formative Feedback on Teaching: A Tool for Faculty Development. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching & Learning, 8(1), 118.</p><p>Haren, F. (2010).The Developing World. Singapore: Interestings Book.</p><p>Henriksen, E. (2014). Understanding Student Participation and Choice in Science and Technology Education. Dordrecht: Springer.</p><p>Hicks, S. D. (2011). Technology in todays classroom: Are you a tech-savvy teacher. The Clearing House, 84(5), 188-191.</p><p>Howard Gardner. (1993). Multiple Intelligences. Basic Books. United States of America.</p><p>Idris, N. (2013). Penyelidikan dalam Pendidikan: Edisi kedua.Kuala Lumpur: McGraw-Hill.</p><p>Jariah, Maznah, Badariah & Shamsulikram (2017). Buku Teks Sains Tingkatan Dua. Karagkraf Network Sdn. Bhd.</p><p>Jonassen (1991). Objectivism versus Constructivism: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm? Education Technology Research & Development, 39 (3), 5-14</p><p>Kailani, I., Ismail, K. (2010). Mengenal Pasti Faktor-Faktor Yang Menyebabkan Pelajar Kurang Cemerlang Dalam Mata Pelajaran Sains. Satu Kajian Tinjauan Di Sebuah Sekolah Menengah Luar Bandar Fakulti Pendidikan. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.</p><p>Karahan, E., & Roehrig, G. (2016). Use of web 2.0 technologies to enhance learning experiences in alternative school settings. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 4(4), 272-283.</p><p>Keengwe, J. (2007). Faculty integration of technology into instruction and students' perceptions of computer technology to improve student learning. Journal of Information Technology Education, 6, 169-180.</p><p>Keengwe, J., & Onchwari, G. (2011). Fostering meaningful student learning through constructivist pedagogy and technology integration. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 7(4), 1-10.</p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013). Preliminary-Blueprint-BM. Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007</p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2016). Laporan TIMSS 2015-Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study, 11. Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.my/images/Terbitan/RujukanAkademik/pubfile_file_002124.pdf</p><p>Kocadere, S. A., & Caglar, S. (2015). The design and implementation of a gamified assessment. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 11(3), 85-99.</p><p>Koller, O., Daniels, Z., Schnabel, K. U., & Baumert, J. (2000). Matematik dan pilihan kursus kanak-kanak dalam matematik: Peranan konsep dan minat diri khusus subjek. Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan, 14(1), 2637.</p><p>Kuenzi, J. J., Jayarajah, K., Saat, R. M., Amnah, R., Rauf, A., Contexts, P., Ayob, A. (2016). Analisis Status Pendidikan Sains Dan Matematik , Dan Persediaan Tenaga Manusia Sains dan Teknologi Negara. Jurnal Persidangan Kebangsaan Pendidikan Sains Dan Teknologi, 10(3), 153154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2015.08.002</p><p>Kumar, R. (2011). Research Methodology 3rd Edition: A Step-by step guide for beginners. Sage Publications Limited.</p><p>Laxman, K. (2011). A study on the adoption of clickers in higher education Background of study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(8), 12911303.</p><p>Leung, E., & Pluskwik, E. (2018). Effectiveness of gamification activities in a project-based learning classroom. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2018June, 115.</p><p>Lopes, A. P. M. (2018). Introducing Intercultural Awareness and Intercultural Communicative Competence for English Learners (Doctoral dissertation).</p><p>Lozano, M. (2017). Learning in Practice: Exploring the Use of Plan-Do-Study-Act Cycles to Support Professional Learning (Doctoral dissertation, UCLA).</p><p>Malaysia, K. P. (2012). Laporan strategi Mencapai Dasar 60:40 aliran Sains/Teknikal: Sastera. Malysia: Ministry of Education.</p><p>Mahoney, J., & Hall, C. (2017). Using technology to differentiate and accommodate students with disabilities. E-Learning and Digital Media, 14(5), 291303. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753017751517</p><p>McBrien, J. L., & Brandt, R. S. (1997). The Language of Learning: A Guide to Education Terms.</p><p>Mohd Arafa, N., & Zakaria, E, L. B. (2017). Penggunaan Aplikasi Plickers Dalam membantu Murid Tahun Tiga Melakukan Latih Tubi Pendaraban. Simposium Pendidikan DiPeribadikan: Perspektif Risalah An-Nur (SPRiN2017)., (2013), 9498.</p><p>Mohd Majid Konting. (1998). Kaedah Penyelididkan Pendidikan. Edisi Keempat. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa Dan Pustaka.</p><p>Mohd Noor, S. (2016). Keberkesanan Bahan Bantu Mengajar VATA Dalam Menangani Miskonsepsi dan Meningkatkan Kefahaman Konsep Abstrak Sains Sekolah Rendah (Tesis Sarjana, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris)</p><p>Mujtaba, T., & Reiss, M. J. (2013a). What sort of girl wants to study physics after the age of 16? Findings from a large-scale UK survey. International Journal of Science Education, 35(17), 29792998.</p><p>Muzirah Ab Mokhti & Nurhana Mohamad Rafiuddin. (2013). Persepsi Guru Sains Yang Mengamalkan Lesson Study Sebagai Program Pembangunan Profesional Guru Terhadap Keberkesanan Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran. In Proceeding of the Global Summit on Education (GSE2013) (Vol. 2013, pp, 1112). Kuala Lumpur.</p><p>Nejla Yuruk. (2011). The Prediction of Pre-service Elementary Teachers Anxiety About Teaching Science. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 10(1), 17-26.</p><p>Nelson, M.L., & Hauck, R.V. (2008). Clicking to learn: A case study of embedding radio-frequency based clickers in an introductory management information systems course. Journal of Information Systems Education, 19(1), 55-64.</p><p>Noriati A. Rashid, Boon Pong Ying, Sharifah Fakhriah Syed Ahmad, (2009) Murid Dan Alam Belajar, Siri Pendidikan Guru, Kuala Lumpur: Oxford Fajar Sdn.Bhd.</p><p>Ologie (2014). Making Digital connections in higher education. Retrieved from http://ologie.com/</p><p>Omar, Z. (2014). Pendekatan konstruktif dalam inovasi pengajaran dan pembelajaran Bahasa Melayu di kolej vokasional (Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia).</p><p>Othman Mohamed. (2000). Prinsip Psikoterapi dan Pengurusan dalam Kaunseling. Serdang: Universiti Putra Malaysia.</p><p>Palaniappan, A. K. (2009). Penyelidikan dan SPSS (PASW). Pearson-Prentice Hall.</p><p>Phang, F. A., Abu, M. S., Ali, M. B., & Salleh, S. (2014). Faktor Penyumbang Kepada Kemerosotan Penyertaan Pelajar dalam Aliran Sains : Satu Analisis Sorotan Tesis. Sains Humanika, 2010, 6371. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2011v36n3.2</p><p>Piaw, C. Y. (2006). Kaedah dan Statistik Penyelidikan. Malaysia: Mc. Graw Hill Sdn Bhd.</p><p>Ramsey, B., Duffy, A. (2016). Formative assessment in the classroom: Findings from three districts. Michael and Susan Dell Foundation and Education, 1. Retrieved from https://education-first.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/MSDFFormative-Assessment-Study-Final-Report.pdf</p><p>Reiswig, J. (2010). Mendeley. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 98(2), 193.</p><p>Revilla, M. A., Saris, W. E., & Krosnick, J. A. (2014). Choosing the Number of Categories in Agree-Disagree Scales. Sociological Methods and Research, 43(1), 7397. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124113509605</p><p>Robinson, C. (2018). Technology tools for paperless formative assessment. Science Scope, 41(7), 2428.</p><p>Rogers, E.M. (2008). The fourteenth paw: Growing up on lowa farm in the 1930s. Singapore: Asia Media Information and Communication Centre.</p><p>Royer, R. (2016). A Comparison of Eight Digital Tools for Formative Assessment. In Proceedings of E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 113-118). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).</p><p>Sekaran, U. (2000). Research Method for Business: A Skill Building Approach (2nd Ed.) New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.</p><p>Sanders, K. (2016). A Comparison of Teacher Perceptions of Students Abilities and Students Self-Reported Technological Abilities (Doctoral dissertation, Lindenwood University).</p><p>Sanmugam, M., Abdullah, Z., Mohamed, H., Aris, B., Zaid, N. M., & Suhadi, S. M. (2016). The affiliation between student achievement and elements of gamification in learning science. 2016 4th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology, ICoICT 2016, 4(c), 14. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICoICT.2016.7571962</p><p>Sarip, M. I. M. (2016). Penggunaan Perisian Plickers dalam Pembelajaran ICT. Seminar Bahasa Melayu, 411420.</p><p>Schell, J., Lukoff, B., & Mazur, E. (2013). Catalyzing learner engagement using cutting-edge classroom response systems in higher education. Cutting-Edge Technologies in Higher Education, 6. 233-261. http://doi.org/ 10.1108/S20449968(2013)000006E011</p><p>Shelly, G. B., Gunter, G. A. & Gunter, R. E. (2012). Teacher discovery computers integrating technology in a connected world. 7th edition. Course technologie, Cengage Learning. Shell Cashman Series. United States of America.</p><p>Shim, J. P., Dekleva, S., Guo, C., & Mittleman, D. (2011). Twitter, Google, iPhone/iPad, and Facebook (TGIF) and smart technology environments: how well do educators communicate with students via TGIF?. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 29(1), 656-672.</p><p>Sidek, M. N., & Jamaludin, A. (2005). Pembinaan modul: Bagaimana membina modul latihan dan modul akademik. Serdang: Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia.</p><p>Solmaz, E., & Cetin, E. (2017). Ask-response-play-learn: Students views on gamification based interactive response systems. Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies in the World, 7(3), 2841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patbio.2003.12.001</p><p>Smith, T. (2017). Innovative Science Programs Help Students Identify and Solve Real-World Problems. Journal of Technology and Science Education,</p><p>Smith, R. (2005). Chemical process: design and integration. John Wiley & Sons.</p><p>Syaharom Abdullah. (1990). Panduan Amali untuk Penyelididkan Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.</p><p>Terrion, J., & Aceti, V. (2012) Perceptions of the effects of clicker technology on student learning and engagement: A study of freshmen chemistry students. Research in Learning Technology, 20, 1-11.</p><p>The Star (2015, September 23). Kaji Mengapa Pelajar Tidak Minat sains. MStar. Retrieved from http://www.mstar.com.my/berita/berita-semasa/2015/09/23/kajimengapa-pelajar-tidak-minat-subjek-sains/</p><p>Tuckman, B.W. (1978). Conducting Educational research. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc</p><p>Tuckman, B.W., & Waheed, M.A. 1981. Evaluating an individualized Science Programme for Community College Students, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 18: 489-495.</p><p>Tyner, K., & Costa, C. (2018). Proceedings of Play2Learn. Retrieved from http://gamilearning.ulusofona.pt/wpcontent/uploads/full_P2L_Proceedings.pdf#page=30</p><p>Udovic, D., Morris, D., Dickman, A., Postlethwait, J., & Wetherwax, P. (2002). Workshop biology: demonstrating the effectiveness of active learning in an introductory biology course. AIBS Bulletin, 52(3), 272-281.</p><p>Umi Nadiha Mohd Noor (2011). Pencerapan Kemahiran Generik dalam Pengajaran Guru Bahasa Melayu Sekolah Menengah. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu ISSN:2180-4842 Vol. 1, Bil.2</p><p>Van Griethuijsen, R. A. L. F., van Eijck, M. W., Haste, H., den Brok, P. J., Skinner, N. C., Mansour, N., BouJaoude, S. (2015). Global Patterns in Students Views of Science and Interest in Science. Research in Science Education, 45(4), 581603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9438-6</p><p>Veal, M., & Lund, J. (2013). Assessment-driven instruction in physical education. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics</p><p>Von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Radical Constructivism: A Way of Knowing and Learning. Studies in Mathematics Education Series: 6. Falmer Press, Taylor & Francis Inc., 1900 Frost Road, Suite 101, Bristol, PA 19007.</p><p>Wuttiprom, S., Toeddhanya, K., Buachoom, A., & Wuttisela, K. (2017). Using Plickers Cooperate with Peer Instruction to Promote Students Discussion in Introductory Physics Course. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(11), 19551961. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.051111</p><p>Yahya, B., & Lailinanita, A. (2012). Inovasi Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran Dalam Kalangan Guru-Guru Teknikal Di Sekolah Menengah Teknik Dari Perspektif Guru. Journal of Technical, Vocational & Engineering Education, 6, 4458.</p> |