Penilaian pelaksanaan Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah dalam kurikulum mata pelajaran Sains Rumah Tangga (SRT) bagi sekolah menengah harian di Negeri Kelantan

Penilaian pelaksanaan Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah dalam kurikulum mata pelajaran Sains Rumah Tangga (SRT) bagi sekolah menengah harian di Negeri Kelantan

<p>Kajian ini adalah bertujuan untuk menilai pelaksanaan Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah dalam kurikulum mata pelajaran Sains Rumah Tangga (SRT) bagi sekolah menengah harian di Negeri Kelantan untuk memgemukakan cadangan penambah baik dalam pelaksanaan PBD kepada guru dan murid mata pelajaran...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nor Asimah Zakaria
Format: thesis
Language:zsm
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=8734
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:8734
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
collection UPSI Digital Repository
language zsm
topic
spellingShingle
Nor Asimah Zakaria
Penilaian pelaksanaan Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah dalam kurikulum mata pelajaran Sains Rumah Tangga (SRT) bagi sekolah menengah harian di Negeri Kelantan
description <p>Kajian ini adalah bertujuan untuk menilai pelaksanaan Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah dalam kurikulum mata pelajaran Sains Rumah Tangga (SRT) bagi sekolah menengah harian di Negeri Kelantan untuk memgemukakan cadangan penambah baik dalam pelaksanaan PBD kepada guru dan murid mata pelajaran SRT. Penilaian ini dibuat dengan menggunakan Model Stake Countenance (1967) yang berorientasikan pelanggan melibatkan tiga komponen iaitu komponen input, proses dan hasil jangka pendek. Penganalisisan data dibuat dengan menggunakan program SPSS Window versi 24.0 di mana analisis deskriptif seperti frekuensi, peratusan, min dan sisihan piawai serta analisis inferensi Regresi Berganda digunakan. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan pelaksanaan PBD dalam kalangan guru dan murid mata pelajaran SRT hampir berjaya secara keseluruhannya. Ini berdasarkan analisis kajian yang menunjukkan tahap hasil jangka pendek pelaksanaan PBD iaitu peningkatan pengetahuan dan peningkatan kemahiran guru berada pada tahap yang tinggi. Manakala, pembentukan sikap positif murid berada pada tahap yang sangat tinggi. Penilaian input menunjukan bahawa tahap pengetahuan Standard Prestasi, Aras Taksonomi Bloom, JSU, kaedah pemarkahan dan etika penilaian adalah tinggi begitu juga dengan tahap input pengetahuan dan kefahaman murid juga tinggi. Bagi penilaian tahap proses aktiviti pelaksanaan PBD guru menunjukan bahawa tahap aktiviti membuat perancangan, mentadbir ujian dan membuat perekodan serta pelaporan adalah sangat tinggi, manakala aktiviti menganalisis evidens dan mengaplikasimaklumat pentaksiran adalah tinggi. Bagi proses tanggungjawab murid menunjukkan tahap yang sangat tinggi. Analisis Regresi Berganda mendapati terdapat satu variabel bebas yang menyumbang kepada peningkatan pengetahuan dan peningkatan kemahiran guru serta tiga faktor penyumbang kepada pembentukan sikap positif murid terhadap pelaksanaan PBD.</p>
format thesis
qualification_name
qualification_level Doctorate
author Nor Asimah Zakaria
author_facet Nor Asimah Zakaria
author_sort Nor Asimah Zakaria
title Penilaian pelaksanaan Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah dalam kurikulum mata pelajaran Sains Rumah Tangga (SRT) bagi sekolah menengah harian di Negeri Kelantan
title_short Penilaian pelaksanaan Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah dalam kurikulum mata pelajaran Sains Rumah Tangga (SRT) bagi sekolah menengah harian di Negeri Kelantan
title_full Penilaian pelaksanaan Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah dalam kurikulum mata pelajaran Sains Rumah Tangga (SRT) bagi sekolah menengah harian di Negeri Kelantan
title_fullStr Penilaian pelaksanaan Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah dalam kurikulum mata pelajaran Sains Rumah Tangga (SRT) bagi sekolah menengah harian di Negeri Kelantan
title_full_unstemmed Penilaian pelaksanaan Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah dalam kurikulum mata pelajaran Sains Rumah Tangga (SRT) bagi sekolah menengah harian di Negeri Kelantan
title_sort penilaian pelaksanaan pentaksiran bilik darjah dalam kurikulum mata pelajaran sains rumah tangga (srt) bagi sekolah menengah harian di negeri kelantan
granting_institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
granting_department Fakulti Teknikal dan Vokasional
publishDate 2020
url https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=8734
_version_ 1776104560048209920
spelling oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:87342023-03-02 Penilaian pelaksanaan Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah dalam kurikulum mata pelajaran Sains Rumah Tangga (SRT) bagi sekolah menengah harian di Negeri Kelantan 2020 Nor Asimah Zakaria <p>Kajian ini adalah bertujuan untuk menilai pelaksanaan Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah dalam kurikulum mata pelajaran Sains Rumah Tangga (SRT) bagi sekolah menengah harian di Negeri Kelantan untuk memgemukakan cadangan penambah baik dalam pelaksanaan PBD kepada guru dan murid mata pelajaran SRT. Penilaian ini dibuat dengan menggunakan Model Stake Countenance (1967) yang berorientasikan pelanggan melibatkan tiga komponen iaitu komponen input, proses dan hasil jangka pendek. Penganalisisan data dibuat dengan menggunakan program SPSS Window versi 24.0 di mana analisis deskriptif seperti frekuensi, peratusan, min dan sisihan piawai serta analisis inferensi Regresi Berganda digunakan. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan pelaksanaan PBD dalam kalangan guru dan murid mata pelajaran SRT hampir berjaya secara keseluruhannya. Ini berdasarkan analisis kajian yang menunjukkan tahap hasil jangka pendek pelaksanaan PBD iaitu peningkatan pengetahuan dan peningkatan kemahiran guru berada pada tahap yang tinggi. Manakala, pembentukan sikap positif murid berada pada tahap yang sangat tinggi. Penilaian input menunjukan bahawa tahap pengetahuan Standard Prestasi, Aras Taksonomi Bloom, JSU, kaedah pemarkahan dan etika penilaian adalah tinggi begitu juga dengan tahap input pengetahuan dan kefahaman murid juga tinggi. Bagi penilaian tahap proses aktiviti pelaksanaan PBD guru menunjukan bahawa tahap aktiviti membuat perancangan, mentadbir ujian dan membuat perekodan serta pelaporan adalah sangat tinggi, manakala aktiviti menganalisis evidens dan mengaplikasimaklumat pentaksiran adalah tinggi. Bagi proses tanggungjawab murid menunjukkan tahap yang sangat tinggi. Analisis Regresi Berganda mendapati terdapat satu variabel bebas yang menyumbang kepada peningkatan pengetahuan dan peningkatan kemahiran guru serta tiga faktor penyumbang kepada pembentukan sikap positif murid terhadap pelaksanaan PBD.</p> 2020 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=8734 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=8734 text zsm closedAccess Doctoral Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Teknikal dan Vokasional <p>Abdul Fatah Abdul Malik & Mohd Majid Konting. (1993). Memahami penyelidikan pendidikan: Satu pengenalan (Edisi ke-4). Fakulti Pengajian Pendidikan, Serdang, Selangor: Universiti Putra Malaysia.</p><p>Abubakar Aminu Boyi. (2019). Vocational/Technical Education in Nigeria: An Indispensable Tool for Resolving National Conflicts and Economic Development. International Journal of Innovative Research in Social Sciences and Strategic Management Techniques, 6 (1), 23-33.</p><p>Afinde Othman. (2016). Pengetahuan, kemahiran dan amalan guru membina item kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi (KBAT) dalam instrumen pentaksiran pembelajaran. Tesis Ijazah Sarjana yang tidak diterbitkan, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia.</p><p>Ainon Muhammad. (1997). Memahami Psikologi Berfikir. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publication & Distributors Sdn Bhd.</p><p>Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhi & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action. Control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11-39). Heidelberg: Springer.</p><p>Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211. </p><p>Akta Pendidikan 1996 (Akta 550), Peraturan-peraturan dan Kaedah-kaedah terpilih: (hingga 25hb Januari 2008). Petaling Jaya, Selangor: International Law Book Services.</p><p>Alkin, M. C. (2004) Evaluation roots: Tacing Theorists' view and influences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage</p><p>Allport, G. W. (1935). A Handbook of Social Psychology. (pp. 798-844). Worcester, MA, US: Clark University Press.</p><p>American Federation of Teachers, W., D.C.;, National Council on Measurement in Education, W., D.C.; , & National Education Association, W., D.C. (1990). Standards for Teacher Competence in Educational Assessment of Students. (ED323186). Washington, D.C.: American Federation of Teachers National Council on Measurement in Education. National Education Association.</p><p>Anuar Ahmad & Nelson Jinggan. (2017). Pengaruh kompetensi kemahiran guru dalam pengajaran terhadap pencapaian akademik pelajar dalam mata pelajaran sejarah. Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 3(2),1-11.</p><p>Anderson, L. W., & Postlethwaite, T. N. (2007). Program evaluation: large-scale and small-scale studies. In T. I. I. f. E. P. (IIEP) (Ed.). Paris</p><p>Anizah Ahmad & Zamri Mahmod. (2015) Tahap kemahiran guru Bahasa Melayu sekolah menengah dalam melaksanakan Pentaksiran Berasaskan Sekolah berdasarkan jantina, opsyen dan tempat mengajar. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu, 5(1):18-29</p><p>Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Irvine, C. K. S., & Walker, D. (2018). Introduction to Research in Education. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.</p><p>Asnul Dahar Minghat, Nor Fadila Amin, Ruhizan M.Yasin, & Ramlee Mustapha. (2012). Pembinaan indikator kelestarian pendidikan teknikal dan vokasional sekolah menengah harian melalui kajian delphi. Paper presented at the Seminar Kebangsaan Majlis Dekan Pendidikan IPTA, The Zon Regency by The Sea, Johor Bahru.</p><p>Asnul Dahar Minghat, Ruhizan M. Yasin, Kamalularifin Subari, & Muhammad Khair Noordin. (2013a). Strategi Kelasterian Pembangunan Pendidikan Teknikal dan Vokasional (PTV). Paper presented at the 2nd International Seminar on Quality and Affordable Education (ISQAE 2013) KSL Hotel & Resort, Johor.</p><p>Asnul Dahar Minghat, Ruhizan M. Yasin, Kamalularifin Subari, & Noordin, M. K. (2013b). Strategi Kelasterian Pembangunan Pendidikan Teknikal dan Vokasional (PTV). Paper presented at the 2nd International Seminar on Quality and Affordable Education.</p><p>Asri Selamat. (2007). Amalan pentaksiran pengajaran dan pembelajaran di sekolah-sekolah menengah bestari Negeri Johor Darul Takzim. Tesis Ijazah Doktor Falsafah yang tidak diterbitkan. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.</p><p>Agus. (2012). Definisi menurut para ahli: Pengertian tanggungjawab. Dicapai pada 3/1/2020 daripada http://www.definisimenurutparaahli.com/pengertian-bertanggung-jawab-dan-contohnya/</p><p>Azizi Yahaya. (2001). The using of model context, input, process and products (CIPP) in learning programs assessment. Paper presented at the International Conference on Challenges and Prospects in Teacher Education, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai.</p><p>Azizi Yahaya, Jamaluddin Ramli, Shahrin Hashim. (2007). Sejauh manakah model Stufflebeam (KIPP) boleh membantu dalam penilaian program pembelajaran?. Dicapai daripada http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/2256/</p><p>Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2018). Panduan Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah. Putrajaya, Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p>Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2015). Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran, Mata pelajaran Sains Rumah Tangga Tingkatan 4. Putrajaya, Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p>Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2014). Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Menengah. Putrajaya, Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p>Baharom Mohamad, Fazlina Yunus, Mohamad Johdi Salleh & Mohamad Yusof Abdullah. (2010). Kepimpinan autentik dalam pendidikan teknik dan vokasional politeknik. Malaysian Educational Dean's Council Journal 6:35-48.</p><p>Becker, G. S. (2009). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. Chicago: University of Chicago press.</p><p>Bentley, W. H. (1977). Administering the successful vocational education program. New York: Parker Pub. Co.</p><p>Berk, R. A. (1979). The Construction of Rating Instruments for Faculty Evaluation. The Journal of Higher Education, 50(5), 650-669. doi:10.1080/00221546.1979.11779999</p><p>Bernard, H. R. (2013). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Thousand Oak, California: SAGE Publications.</p><p>Biggs, J. (2003). Aligning teaching for constructing learning. Higher Education Academy, 1(4).</p><p>Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom assessment and pedagogy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(6), 551-575. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2018.1441807</p><p>Blackburn, B. R. (2017). Rigor and Assessment in the Classroom. New York: Routledge.</p><p>Bloom, B.S., Engelhart, M.D., Furst, E., Hill, W.H. & Krathwohl, D.R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook I cognitive domain. United States of America: Longman Group Limited.</p><p>Che Aleha Ladin. (2015). Pentaksiran berasaskan sekolah pendidikan seni visual sekolah menengah.Tesis Ijazah Doktor Falsafah yang tidak diterbitkan, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.</p><p>Christoforidou, M., Kyriakides, L., Antoniou, P., & Creemers, B. P. (2014). Searching for stages of teacher's skills in assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 40, 1-11.</p><p>Chua Yan Piaw. (2014). Statistik penyelidikan lanjutan: Ujian regresi, analisis faktor dan analisis SEM (Edisi Kedua). Kuala Lumpur: McGraw-Hill.</p><p>Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2017). Research Methods in Education (8th ed.). New York: Routledge.</p><p>Conrad, Clifton, & Wilson, R. F. (1985). Academic Program Reviews: Institutional Approaches, Expectations, and Controversies. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 5, 1985. Dicapai daripada Washington, DC: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED264806</p><p>Creswell. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (4th ed.). Boston MA: Pearson.</p><p>Creswell, & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage publications.</p><p>Deepwell, F. (2002). Towards Capturing Complexity: an interactive framework for institutional evaluation. Educational Technology & Society, 5(3).</p><p>Denison, E. F., & Stein, H. (2012). The Sources of Economic Growth in the United States and the Alternatives Before Us. United States: Literary Licensing, LLC.</p><p>Deutscher, V., & Winther, E. (2018). Instructional sensitivity in vocational education. Learning and Instruction, 53, 21-33. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.07.004</p><p>Doll, R. C. (1995). Curriculum Improvement: Decision Making and Process. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, Incorporated.</p><p>Donaldson, S. I. (2007). Program Theory-Driven Evaluation Science: Strategies and Applications. London, United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis.</p><p>Dunham, D. B. (1989). Vocational education in the secondary school: The case for continuation. Economics of Education Review, 8(1), 69-74.</p><p>Education Act 1961, Federation of Malaya Act of Parliament No. 43 of 1961. (1961). Kuala Lumpur: Govnt. Press</p><p>Bruce B. F. (2018). The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.</p><p>Faizah. (2019). Pengenalan BPTV. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Dicapai daripada https://www.moe.gov.my/korporat/bahagian-dan-unit/bahagian-pendidikan-dan-latihan-teknikal-vokasional</p><p>Faridah Mariani Johari, Widad Othman, Hairul Nizam Ismail, & Zainudin Isa. (2014). Isu dan Cabaran Pelaksanaan Pendidikan Asas Vokasional (PAV) di Sekolah Menengah Harian, Malaysia. Paper presented at the PDE Professional Development in Education Conference, Park Hotel Bandung.</p><p>Fatima, G., Malik, M., Abid, U., & Dur-e-Nayab. (2016). Early Childhood Special Education Program at the Outcome Phase: An Evaluation from Stake's Countenance Model Perspective. Bulletin of Education and Research, 38(2).</p><p>Field, A. (2013). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications.</p><p>Finch, C. R., & Crunkilton, J. R. (1999). Curriculum Development in Vocational and Technical Education: Planning, Content, and Implementation (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.</p><p>Fitzpatrick, J. L., Sanders, J. R., & Worthen, B. R. (2017). Program Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines. (4 edition ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.</p><p>Fitzpatrick, J. L., Sanders, J. R., & Worthen, B. R. (2011). Program Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.</p><p>Fives, H., Barnes, N., Buehl, M. M., Mascadri, J., & Ziegler, N. (2017). Teachers' Epistemic Cognition in Classroom Assessment. Educational Psychologist, 52(4), 270-283. doi:10.1080/00461520.2017.1323218</p><p>Fook Yuen Chan, Gurnam Kaur Sidhu, Alinah Mohd Radzi, Parmjit Singh & Rizal Md Yunus. (2013). Keyakinan guru sejarah dan geografi dalam pelaksanaan kerja kursus. Dicapai pada 20/1/20101 daripada https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Penilaian-kemahiran-guru-sejarah-dan-geografi-dalam-Chan-Sidhu.</p><p>Fournier, D. M. (1994). Reviewed Work: The Program Evaluation Standards: How to Assess Evaluations of Educational Programs. [The Program Evaluation Standards: How to Assess Evaluations of Educational Programs, The Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation]. Journal of Educational Measurement, 31(4), 363-367.</p><p>The Fourth Malaysia Plan (FMP) (Rancangan Malaysia Ke-4, RME) 1981-1985 (1980). Dicapai daripada https://www.pmo.gov.my/dokumenattached/RMK/RM4.pdf</p><p>Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2014). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.</p><p>Fullan, M. G. (2007). Change the terms for teacher learning. The Learning Professional, 28(3), 35.</p><p>Fullan, M. G. (2015). The New Meaning of Educational Change (5th ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.</p><p>Fullan, M. G. & Pomfret, A. (1977). Research on Curriculum and Instruction Implementation. Review of Educational Research, 47(2), 335-397. doi:10.3102/00346543047002335</p><p>Fullan, M. G. (2000). The three stories of education reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 81(8), 581-584.</p><p>Fullan, M. G. (1992). Successful School Improvement: The implementation perspective and beyond. Buckingham, United Kingdom: McGraw-Hill Education.</p><p>Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2012). Educational research : competencies for analysis and applications (10th ed.). United States of America: Pearson Education, Inc.</p><p>Gay, L. R. (1991). Educational Evaluation and Measurement: Competencies for Analysis and Application (2nd ed.). London: Macmillan.</p><p>Ghazali @ Hassan Sulaiman & Abdul Said Ambotang. (2017). Pengaruh Pendidikan Asas Vokasional terhadap Kebolehkerjaan Murid Sekolah Menengah Harian di Sabah. Jurnal Pusat Penataran Ilmu Dan Bahasa (PPIB), 26(1), 211-236.</p><p>Gondikit, J. (2018). The Evaluation of Post PT3 Program Using Stake's Countenance Model. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 3(4), 109-118.</p><p>Gredler, M. E. (1996). Program Evaluation. United States: Merrill.</p><p>Green, S. K., Johnson, R. L., Kim, D.-H., & Pope, N. S. (2007). Ethics in classroom assessment practices: Issues and attitudes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(7), 999-1011. doi:http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.042</p><p>Gronlund, N.E. (1971). Measurement and evaluation in teaching. 2nd Edition. New York: The Macmillan Company.</p><p>Gunasegaran A/L Raman. (2014). Penilaian pelaksanaan mata pelajaran vokasional-landskap dan nurseri (MPV-LN) di peringkat sekolah menengah di semenanjung Malaysia. Tesis Ijazah Doktor Falsafah yang tidak diterbitkan. Universiti Malaya.</p><p>Haddad, W. D. (1979). Educational and Economic Effects of Promotion and Repetition Practices. Staff Working Paper No. 319.</p><p>Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2013). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). London, United Kingdom: Pearson Education Limited.</p><p>Hamilton, D. (1976). Curriculum evaluation. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Open Books Publishing Ltd.</p><p>Hardy, M. A., & Bryman, A. (2009). Handbook of Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications.</p><p>Harlen.W. (1980). Values and evaluation in education. London: Harper.</p><p>Hayes, N. (2000). Doing Psychological Research: Gathering and Analysing Data. Philadelphia: Open University Press.</p><p>Heinrich, H. W., D., P., & Ross. (1980). Industry Accident Prevention A Safety Management Approach. New York: Mc Graw Publisher.</p><p>Hunt, D. P. (2003). The concept of knowledge and how to measure it. Journal of intellectual capital, 4(1), 100-113.</p><p>Syed Talib Hussain, Shen Lei, Tayyaba Akram, Muhammad Jamal Haider, Syed Hadi Hussain, & Muhammad Ali. (2018). Kurt Lewin's change model: A critical review of the role of leadership and employee involvement in organizational change. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 3(3), 123-127.</p><p>Irwan Rosleh. (2019). Tranformasi PTV ke arah melahirkan modal insan kelas pertama. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Dicapai daripada https://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/14920/</p><p>Jackson, S. L. (2015). Research Methods and Statistics: A Critical Thinking Approach. Boston. MA: Cengage Learning.</p><p>James, D., Schraw, G., & Kuch, F. (2019). Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education Using the margin of error statistic to examine the effects of aggregating student evaluations of teaching. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(7), 1042-1052. doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1570482</p><p>Jamil Ahmad (2002). Pemupukan budaya penyelidikan di kalangan guru di sekolah: Satu penilaian. Tesis Ijazah Kedoktoran Falsafah yang tidak diterbitkan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.</p><p>Joan, S. J. (2013). An Evaluation of the Implementation of Aspects of the Revised Jamaican Primary Science Curriculum and Enactment of Professional Development. Dicapai daripada https://www.mona.uwi.edu/soe/sites/default/files/soe/uploads/Volume%202%20No%203%20June%202013.pdf</p><p>Lauglo, J & Lillis, K. (1988). Vocationalizing Education an International Perspective. London: Pergamons Books Ltd.</p><p>Kamisah Osman, Zanaton Iksan & Lilia Halim. (2007). Sikap terhadap sains dan sikap saintifik di kalangan pelajar sains. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia| Malaysian Journal of Education, 32.</p><p>Kellogg, W. K. (2004). W.K. Kellogg Foundation Logic Model Development Guide. Dicapai pada 3/1/2020, daripada Association of American Colleges and Universities http://www.aacu.org/node/5682</p><p>Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia, Laporan Jawatankuasa Kabinet Mengkaji Pelaksanaan Dasar Pelajaran (Laporan Kabinet). (1979). Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.</p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2011). Pelan Strategik Transformasi Pendidikan Vokasional. Di capai daripada https://www.moe.gov.my/images/kpm/pemberitahuan/2014/articlefile_file_003631.pdf</p><p>Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212-218. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2</p><p>Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and PBDychological measurement, 30(3), 607-610.</p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2012). Laporan Awal Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025. Putrajaya, Kuala Lumpur.</p><p>Lawton, D. (2014). Theory and Practice of Curriculum Studies. London: Routledge.</p><p>Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia. (2009). Pengurusan dan pengendalian Pentaksiran Berasaskan Sekolah (PBS) Sekolah Rendah. Putrajaya, Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p>Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia. (2011). Pengurusan dan pengendalian Pentaksiran Berasaskan Sekolah (PBS) Sekolah Rendah. Putrajaya, Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p>Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia. (2012). Panduan Pengurusan Pentaksiran Berasaskan Sekolah. Putrajaya. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p>Levin, R. I., & Rubin, D. S. (1994). Statistics for management. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.</p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013). Pelan pembangunan pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025. Dicapai daripada http://www. moe. gov. my.</p><p>Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia. (2011). Apa yang anda perlu tahu tentang Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah. Putrajaya, Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p>Maharam Mamat, Dayana Daiman, Rahani Mohd Musa, Nur Athirah Irham, Wong Kok Mun & Yong Voon Yau. (2019). Kebolehpekerjaan Graduan Institut Latihan Perindustrian Kuala Langat, Selangor. Jurnal Pengajian Umum Asia Tenggara 20(1): 46-63. https://doi.org/10.17576/malim-2019-2001-05.</p><p>Marina Ibrahim Mukhtar. (2016). Penilaian pelaksanaan pentaksiran kompetensi pensijilan modular (PKPM) di sekolah menengah vokasional. Tesis Ijazah Doktor Falsafah yang tidak diterbitkan. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.</p><p>Maxwell, V. C. (2010). Teachers' responses to pedagogical challenge: Investigating the implementation of a new mathematics curriculum. Dicapai pada 3 Januari 2020, daripada https://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url ver</p><p>McCormick, R., & James, M. (1988). Curriculum Evaluation in Schools. London: Routledge.</p><p>McMillan, J. H. (2013). Classroom Assessment: Pearson New International Edition: Principles and Practice for Effective Standards-Based Instruction (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education Limited.</p><p>McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2014). Research in Education: Evidence-Based Inquiry (7th ed.). United Kingdom: Pearson Education.</p><p>McMillan, J. H. (2015). Fundamentals of Educational Research. United Kingdom: Pearson Education.</p><p>Mertens, D. M., & Wilson, A. T. (2018). Program Evaluation Theory and Practice. A comprehensive guide (Second ed.). New York: Guilford Publications.</p><p>Miller, R. L. (2013). Logic models: A useful way to study theories of evaluation practice? Evaluation and program planning, 38, 77-80.</p><p>Mimi Mohaffyza Mohamad, Yee Mei Heong & Tee Tze Kiong. (2014). Conceptions of learning through learning styles and cognitive dimension in vocational education. Journal of Technical Education and Training (JTET), 6(1).</p><p>Mohammad Hazrul Md Jori. (2018). Pelaksanaan pengajaran dan pembelajaran berdasarkan pendekatan OBE dalam program Diploma Teknologi Automotif di kolej vokasional: Penilaian menggunakan dimensi proses model CIPP. Disertasi Ijazah Doktor Pendidikan yang tidak diterbitkan, Universiti Sains Malaysia.</p><p>Mohd Anuar Abd Rahman & Zamiyah Ali. (2010). Pelaksanaan pentaksiran kerja kursus Kemahiran Hidup Bersepadu di sekolah menengah luar bandar daerah Kuantan, Pahang. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Skudai, Johor.</p><p>Mohd Ariffin, Asrol Afendi & Nordin, Aziz. (2012). Faktor-faktor yang menentukan pemilihan pelajar mengikuti kursus di kolej komuniti di sekitar negeri Johor. Tesis Ijazah Sarjana Muda yang tidak diterbitkan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.</p><p>Mohd Azilan Ramli, Ramlee Mustapha & Roszelina Abd Rahman. (2018). Hubungan kemahiran kebolehkerjaan pelajar kolej vokasional pertanian dengan kesediaan menghadapi revolusi industri 4.0. Journal of Life Long Learning, 2(1), 1-15.</p><p>Mohd Majid, K. (1993). Kaedah Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.</p><p>Mohd Najib Abdul Ghafar. (2003). Reka Bentuk Tinjauan Soal Selidik Pendidikan. Skudai: Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.</p><p>Mohd Najib Abdul Ghafar. (2011). Pembinaan dan analisis ujian bilik darjah. Edisi ke-2. Skudai, Johor Bharu: UTM Press.</p><p>Mohd Nordin Abu Bakar. (2011). Penilaian program mata pelajaran (MPV) bagi bidang pertanian di sekolah menengah harian di Semenanjung Malaysia. Tesis Ijazah Kedoktoran Falsafah yang tidak diterbitkan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. </p><p>Muhammad Nordin. (2017). Penilaian program sahsiah unggul murid (SUMUR) di sekolah menengah kebangsaan agama (SMKA). Tesis Doktor Falsafah yang tidak diterbitkan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. </p><p>Nevo, D. (1989). Expert opinion in program evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1989(42), 85-93.</p><p>Noor H. Jabarullah & Hafezali Iqbal Hussain. (2019). The effectiveness of problem-based learning in technical and vocational education in Malaysia. Journal Education + Training, 61(5), 552-567. doi:10.1108/ET-06-2018-0129</p><p>Noorzeliana Idris (2016). Penilaian pelaksanaan pentaksiran berasaskan sekolah dalam kalangan guru. Tesis Ijazah Doktor Falsafah yang tidak diterbitkan. Fakulti Pendidikan dan Pembangunan Manusia Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.</p><p>Noraini Bidin, & Zamri Mahamod. (2016). Kesediaan Murid Sekolah Menengah Terhadap Pelaksanaan Pentaksiran Berasaskan Sekolah Dalam mata Pelajaran Bahasa Melayu. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu, 6(1), 64-76.</p><p>Norhafiz Tamaldin. (2013). Kemahiran Mengajar Guru Pendidikan Teknik dan Vokasional Berpandukan Elemen Pengajaran 5E, Penglibatan, Penerokaan, Penjelasan, Penghuraian dan Penilaian. Tesis Ijazah Sarjana yang tidak diterbitkan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.</p><p>Norpadzlihatun Manap, Noor Sakinah Hassan & Noor Shahifah Syahrom. (2017). Preparation of vocational college graduates as skilled workforce in the local construction industry. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 9(2), 69-80.</p><p>Norusis, M. J. (2008). SPSS 16.0 Guide to Data Analysis. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.</p><p>Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.</p><p>Nur Hazwani Zainol @ Zainun & Jamalul Lail Abdul Wahab. (2018). Tahap Kesediaan Komuniti Sekolah Terhadap Keberkesanan Program Pendidikan Asas Vokasional di Sekolah. Journal Selangor Humaniora Review, 2(2), 1-15.</p><p>Nur Suraya Hashim. (2015). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kesediaan untuk berubah dalam kalangan guru sekolah menengah daerah Kubang Pasu, Kedah Darul Aman. Tesis Ijazah Sarjana yang tidak diterbitkan. Universiti Utara Malaysia.</p><p>Olson, M. (2000). Curriculum as a multistoried process. Canadian Journal of Education/Revue canadienne de l'ducation, 169-187.</p><p>Ornstein, A., & Hunkins, F. P. (2016). Curriculum: Foundations, Principles, and Issues (7th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.</p><p>Ornstein, A., & Hunkins, F. P. (2013). Curriculum: Foundations, principles, and issues (6th ed.). Boston, Mass: Allyn and Bacon.</p><p>Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using IBM SPSS. New South Wales, Australia: Allen & Unwin.</p><p>Payne, D. A. (2012). Designing Educational Project and Program Evaluations: A Practical Overview Based on Research and Experience. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.</p><p>Pekeliling Ikhtisas Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia bilangan 9 Tahun 2016. Pelaksanaan Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Menengah secara berperingkat-peringkat mulai tahun 2017. (2016). Putrajaya, Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p>Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025 Laporan Tahunan 2017. (2018). Putrajaya, Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia</p><p>Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025: Pendidikan Pra sekolah hingga Lepas Menengah. (2013). Putrajaya, Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p>Pengenalan Institut Latihan Perindustrian Kuala Lumpur (2019). Dicapai daripada http:// www.ilpkl.gov.my.</p><p>Petkovska, B., Koceva, D., Ulanska, T., & Kirova, S. S. (2010). Primary school education: Standards for student's assessment in primary school. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2366-2370.</p><p>Popham, W. J. (1993). Educational Evaluation. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.</p><p>Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum. ( 2001). Buku Penerangan dan Panduan Penawaran Mata pelajaran Vokasional di sekolah Menengah Akademik Harian (Edisi Kedua ed.). Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p>Pratt. (1994). Curriculum Planning: A Handbook for Professionals. New York: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.</p><p>Pratt, D. (1994). Curriculum Planning: A Handbook for Professionals. New York: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.</p><p>Provus, M. M. (1969). The Discrepancy Evaluation Model: An Approach to Local Program Improvement and Development. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED030957.pdf</p><p>Puckett, M. B., & Black, J. K. (2000). Authentic assessment of the young child: Celebrating development and learning (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.</p><p>Punch, K. F. (2013). Introduction to Social Research: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications.</p><p>Ramlah Ab Khalid. (2016). Penilaian pelaksanaan Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah ke arah pencapaian matlamatnya kepada guru-guru di sekolah rendah. Tesis Ijazah Doktor Falsafah yang tidak diterbitkan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. </p><p>Rancangan Bersepadu Sekolah Menengah (KBSM). (1987). Kuala Lumpur: Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum.</p><p>Rancangan Malaysia Kesebelas 2016-2020 Pertumbuhan Berpaksikan Rakyat. (2017). Dicapai daripada https://jpt.mohe.gov.my/index.php/home/rmk11</p><p>Rands, M. L. & Gansemer-Topf, A. M. (2017). The room itself is active: how classroom design impacts student engagement. Journal of Learning Spaces, 6(1) 2017, 26-33. Dicapai daripada https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/edu_pubs/49</p><p>Rasooli, A., Zandi, H., & DeLuca, C. (2018). Re-conceptualizing classroom assessment fairness: A systematic meta-ethnography of assessment literature and beyond. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 56, 164-181. doi:http://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.12.008</p><p>Razali Arof. (1991). Pengantar kurikulum. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.</p><p>Razzian Mat Razali, Rasmuna Hussain &Ahmad Khairunizam Zulkifli. (2017). Laporan kajian persepsi warga kolej komuniti terhadap peranan dan fungsi kolej komuniti. Journal of Life Long Learning, 1(1), 85-99.</p><p>Report of the Education Review Committee. (1960). Kuala Lumpur: Govnt. Press.</p><p>Rockwell, K., & Bennett, C. (2004). Targeting outcomes of programs: A hierarchy for targeting outcomes and evaluating their achievement. Dicapai daripada https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=1047&context=aglecfacpub</p><p>Rockwell, S. K., Albrecht, J. A., Nugent, G. C., & Kunz, G. M. (2012). Using Targeting Outcomes of Programs as a Framework to Target Photographic Events in Nonformal Educational Programs. American Journal of Evaluation, 33(2), 179-194. doi:10.1177/1098214011421522</p><p>Rohana, Hamzah, Zulfadly, Othman, Hasnah, Hussiin, Zuraina, Ali, Nur Qistina & Abdullah. (2017). Pembangunan model penilaian kurikulum berteraskan nilai universal bagi program pendidikan berteraskan teknologi & kejuruteraan: Satu Kerangka konseptual. International Journal of Humanities Technology and Civilization, No.1, 50-61.</p><p>Rossi, P. H., Lidey, M. W., & Henry, G. T. (2018). Evaluation: A Systematic Approach (8th ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc.</p><p>Royse, D., Thyer, B. A., & Padgett, D. K. (2015). Program Evaluation: An Introduction to an Evidence-Based Approach (6th ed.). Mason, OH, United States: Cengage Learning.</p><p>Ruslina Omar. (2002). Masalah-masalah dalam pelaksanaan pentaksiran kerja amali (PEKA) di sekolah-sekolah menengah di daerah Temerloh. Kertas Projek Sarjana Pendidikan. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.</p><p>Russell, K. M., & Airasian, P. W. (2011). Classroom Assessment: Concepts and Applications (7th ed.). New York, United States: McGraw-Hill Education.</p><p>Saedah Siraj, & Mohammed Sani Ibrahim. (2012). Standard Kompetensi Guru Malaysia. Paper presented at the Paper presented at the Seminar Kebangsaan Majlis Dekan Pendidikan Malaysia, The Zone Regency by The Sea, Johor Bahru.</p><p>Saidatul Amira Hamzah & Irdayanti Mat Nashir. (2018). Menerokai Dimensi Guru Teknikal Dalam Sistem Pendidikan Teknikal Dan Vokasional. Paper presented at the National e-Learning Conferences, Port Dickson, Malaysia.</p><p>Salmiah Jaba. (2013). Hubungan kesediaan, penerimaan, pengoperasian dan keprihatinan guru kemahiran hidup bersepadu pertanian dengan amalan pentaksiran berasaskan sekolah. Tesis Ijazah Doktor Falsafah yang tidak diterbitkan, Universiti Putra Malaysia.</p><p>Sanders, J. R., & Nafziger, D. N. (2011). A basis for determining the adequacy of evaluation designs. Journal of Multi Disciplinary Evaluation, 7(15), 44-78.</p><p>Sanders, J. R., & Vogel, S. R. (1993). The Development of Standards for Teacher Competence in Educational Assessment of Students. Dicapai daripada https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1004&context=burosteachertraining</p><p>Sapsford, R., & Jupp, V. (2006). Data Collection and Analysis (2nd ed.). United States: SAGE Publications.</p><p>Sarason, S. B. (1990). The Predictable Failure of Educational Reform: Can We Change Course Before It's Too Late. New Jersey: Wiley.</p><p>Sarimah Ismail. (2011). Kekangan pelaksanaan mata pelajaran vokasional di sekolah menengah negeri Johor. Tesis Ijazah Sarjana Muda yang tidak diterbitkan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.</p><p>Sarimah Ismail & Farawahida Yassin. (2010). Kekangan Pelaksanaan Mata pelajaran Vokasional Di Sekolah Menengah Negeri Johor. Fakulti Pendidikan. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Dicapai daripada https://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/10497/</p><p>Saylor, J. G., & Alexander, W. M. (1974). Planning Curriculum for Schools. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.</p><p>Schermerhorn, J. R. (2010). Management (11th ed.): John Wiley & Sons.</p><p>Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in Human Capital. The American Economic Review, 51(No.1), 1-17.</p><p>Schultz, T. W. (1971). Investment in human capital: The role of education and of research (Vol. 15): Free Press New York.</p><p>Scriven, M. (1967). The Methodology of Evaluation. In R. E. Stake (Ed.), Curriculum evaluation. American Educational Research Association Monograph Series on Curriculum Evaluation (pp. 39-83). Chicago: Rand McNally.</p><p>Scriven, M. (1974). Evaluation Perspectives and Procedures. In "Evaluation in Education," Popham, W. J., . Berkeley, California: McCutchan Publishing Corp.</p><p>Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2019). Research Methods for Business: A Skill-building Approach (8th ed.). New Jersey, United States: John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated.</p><p>Shamsiah Sidek, Nurin Abdul Majid, Nelly Ezatul Fazlina Md Sah, Hamidah Mohamed, & Noor, H. M. (2010). The role of TVET teachers in school based assessment of vocational electives subjects at Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Dato" Onn, Batu Pahat, Johor. In: World Congress on Teacher Education for TVET in conjunction with World Teachers Day Celebration, 5 - 6 10 2010. Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia.</p><p>Shamsina Shamsudin. (2013) Penggubalan item ujian. Ke arah pelaksanaan PBS berkesan. Kuala Lumpur:Freemind Horizon Sdn. Bhd.</p><p>Sharifah Nor Puteh & T Subahan Mohd Meerah. (2006). Cabaran dan Isu dalam perancangan dan pembangunan kurikulum persekolahan di Malaysia : Satu Analisis Refleksi. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Bangi.</p><p>Sh. Siti Hauzimah Wan Omar (2019). Pengetahuan, kemahiran, sikap dan masalah guru dalam melaksanakan pentaksiran bilik darjah bahasa melayu di sekolah rendah. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu, 9(1), 56-67.</p><p>Sidek Mohd Noah dan Jamaludin Ahmad (2005). Pembinaan modul. Bagaimana membina modul latihan dan modul akademik. Serdang: Penerbit UPM.</p><p>Solow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65-94.</p><p>Stake. (1967). The countenance of educational evaluation. Dicapai daripada https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b07e/5b61cde550bfb0b64e895674a236c9003335.pdf</p><p>Stake, R., & Schwandt, T. (2006). The SAGE Handbook of Evaluation: SAGE Publications Ltd. Dicapai daripada https://methods.sagepub.com/book/the-sage-handbook-of-evaluation. doi:10.4135/9781848608078</p><p>Stake, R. E. (1967). The countenance of educational evaluation: Citeseer.</p><p>Stangor, C. (2015). Social GrouPBD in Action and Interaction (2nd ed.). London: Taylor & Francis.</p><p>Stufflebeam, D. L. (2001). Evaluation models. New directions for evaluation, 2001(89), 7-98.</p><p>Stufflebeam, D.L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation Theory, Models, and Applications: Wiley.</p><p>Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2012). Systematic evaluation: A self-instructional guide to theory and practice (Vol. 8): Springer Science & Business Media.</p><p>Stufflebeam, D. L. (1968). Evaluation as enlightenment for decision-making. Dicapai daripada https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED048333.</p><p>Stufflebeam, D. L. (1971). The relevance of the CIPP evaluation model for educational accountability. Dicapai daripada https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED062385.pdf</p><p>Sudman, S. (1976). Applied sampling. New York: Academic Press New York.</p><p>Suriana Mohd Asari. (2013). Pentaksiran Berasaskan Sekolah untuk Peperiksaan UPSR: Satu penilaian ke arah transformasi sistem Pentaksiran Pendidikan Kebangsaan. Tesis Ijazah Sarjana yang tidak diterbitkan. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi.</p><p>Suzana Abdul Mutalib (2015) Penilaian pelaksanaan formatif di Pra Sekolah Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Tesis Ijazah Doktor Falsafah yang tidak diterbitkan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi.</p><p>Suzuk, E., & Ogan-Bekiroglu, F. (2012). Pre-service physics teachers intentions toward classroom assessment. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 854-863.</p><p>Syahida Nadia Zakaria. (2016). Kesan pendekatan konstruktivisme dan pendekatan tradisional dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran komponen sastera bahasa melayu. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu, 5(2), 12-21.</p><p>Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics: Pearson New International Edition (6th ed.). London, United Kingdom: Pearson Education Limited.</p><p>Tagele, A., & Bedilu, L. (2015). Teachers Competence in the Educational Assessment of Students: The Case of Secondary School Teachers in the Amhara National Regional State. The Ethiopian Journal of Education, 35(2), 163-191.</p><p>Tao, J., & Gao, X. (2017). Teacher agency and identity commitment in curricular reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 346-355. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.01.010</p><p>Tenbrink, T. (1974). Evaluation: A Practical Guide for Teachers. United States of America: McGraw-Hill.</p><p>Thanabalan, T. V., Siraj, S., & Alias, N. (2015). Evaluation of a digital story pedagogical module for the indigenous learners using the stake countenance model. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 907-914.</p><p>Tierney, R. D. (2013). Fairness in classroom assessment. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.). SAGE Handbook of Research on Classroom Assessment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications (pp. 125-144).</p><p>Treagust, D. F., & Rennie, L. J. (1993). Implementing Technology in the School Curriculum: A Case Study Involving Six Secondary Schools. Journal of Technology Education, 5(1), 38-53.</p><p>Trochim, W. M., & Urban, J. B. (2016). Advancing Evaluation of Character Building Programs. Dicapai daripada https://sites.nationalacademies.org/cs/group/dbassesite/.../dbasse 173497.pdf</p><p>Tuckman, B.W., Waheed, MA. (1981). Evaluating an Individualized Science Programme for Community College Students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 18, 489-495.</p><p>Tyler. (1942). General Statement on Evaluation. The Journal of Educational Research, 35(7), 492-501. doi:10.1080/00220671.1942.10881106</p><p>Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.</p><p>UNESCO. (2015). Proposal for the revision of the 2001 revised recommendation concerning technical and vocational education. Paper presented at the UNESCO. General Conference; 38th; Proposal for the revision of the 2001 Revised Recommendation Concerning Technical and Vocational Education, Paris.</p><p>Ura, P. C. (2012). Penilaian program perintis usahawan di sekolah rendah. Tesis Ijazah Doktor Falsafah yang tidak diterbitkan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. </p><p>Utusan. (2017). Tujuh peratus pelajar lepasan tingkatan tiga ikuti TVET. Utusan Online. Dicapai daripada https://www.utusan.com.my/berita/parlimen/tujuh-peratus-pelajar-lepasan-tingkatan-tiga-ikuti-tvet-1.556837</p><p>Vagias, Wade M. (2006). Likert-type scale response anchors. Clemson International Institute for Tourism & Research Development, Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism Management. Clemson University</p><p>Van der Kleij, F. M., Cumming, J. J., & Looney, A. (2018). Policy expectations and support for teacher formative assessment in Australian education reform. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(6), 620-637. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2017.1374924</p><p>Van Dusen, L. M., & Worthen, B. R. (1994). The impact of integrated learning system implementation on student outcomes: Implications for research and evaluation. International Journal of Educational Research, 21(1), 13-24. doi:http://doi.org/10.1016/0883-0355(94)90020-5</p><p>Vedung, E. (2017). Public policy and program evaluation. New York: Routledge.</p><p>Werner, A. (2004). A guide to implementation research. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.</p><p>Windham, D. M. (1988). Effectiveness indicators in the economic analysis of educational activities. International Journal of Educational Research, 12(6), 575-665.</p><p>Wiseman, S. (1969). Curriculum Development and Curriculum Evaluation1. Research in Education, 1(1), 1-8. doi:10.1177/003452376900100104</p><p>Wiseman, S., & Pidgeon, D. A. (1970). Curriculum evaluation. London: National Foundation for Educational Research.</p><p>Wolf, A. (1995). Competence-Based Assessment. Buckingham: Open University Press.</p><p>Wood, B. B. (2001). Stake's countenance model: evaluating an environmental education professional development course. The Journal of Environmental Education, 32(2), 18-27.</p><p>Woodhall, M. (2004). Cost-benefit analysis in educational planning: UNESCO, International Institute for Educational Planning.</p><p>Worthen, B. R., & Sanders, J. R. (1987). Educational Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines. New York: Longman Press.</p><p>Yahya Buntat, & Lailinanita Ahamad (2012). Inovasi Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran Dalam Kalangan Guru-Guru Teknikal Di Sekolah Menengah Teknik Dari Perspektif Guru. Journal of Technical, Vocational & Engineering Education, Volume 6, Pages 44-58.</p><p>Yahya Emat. (2005). Pendidikan Teknik dan Vokasional di Malaysia. Petaling Jaya, Selangor: IBS Buku Sdn. Bhd.</p><p>Yan, Z., & Cheng, E. C. K. (2015). Primary teachers' attitudes, intentions and practices regarding formative assessment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 45, 128-136.</p>

Similar Items