Modul Basic Concepts in Genetics: intervensi tahap penguasaan dan kerangka alternatif konsep asas genetik pelajar Biologi tingkatan empat

<p>Kajian ini bertujuan membangun dan mengkaji kesan Modul Basic Concepts in</p><p>Genetics (BCG) terhadap penguasaan dan kerangka alternatif konsep asas genetik</p><p>pelajar Biologi. Konsep asas genetik yang dikaji ialah gen (KG...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sahabuddin Basri
Format: thesis
Language:zsm
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=8756
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:8756
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
collection UPSI Digital Repository
language zsm
topic LB Theory and practice of education
spellingShingle LB Theory and practice of education
Sahabuddin Basri
Modul Basic Concepts in Genetics: intervensi tahap penguasaan dan kerangka alternatif konsep asas genetik pelajar Biologi tingkatan empat
description <p>Kajian ini bertujuan membangun dan mengkaji kesan Modul Basic Concepts in</p><p>Genetics (BCG) terhadap penguasaan dan kerangka alternatif konsep asas genetik</p><p>pelajar Biologi. Konsep asas genetik yang dikaji ialah gen (KG), kromosom (KK),</p><p>hubungan gen, kromosom dan DNA (HGK) serta hubungan pembahagian sel dan</p><p>pewarisan (HPP). Kajian ini menggunakan pendekatan reka bentuk kajian</p><p>pembangunan berpandukan Model Sidek dan Jamaludin. Reka bentuk kuasi</p><p>eksperimen digunakan bagi menentukan keberkesanan modul. Seramai 64 pelajar</p><p>tingkatan empat dari dua buah sekolah di daerah Tawau dipilih melalui persampelan</p><p>rawak berstrata yang terdiri daripada 34 pelajar kumpulan eksperimen dan 30 pelajar</p><p>kumpulan kawalan. Instrumen kajian ialah Soal Selidik Persepsi Terhadap Modul dan</p><p>Ujian Pencapaian Konsep Asas Genetik. Data dianalisis secara deskriptif dan</p><p>inferensi. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan Modul BCG mempunyai kesahan yang baik</p><p>dengan indeks kesahan 0.94. Hasil analisis terhadap persepsi pelajar menunjukkan</p><p>nilai yang tinggi terhadap kualiti kandungan modul [Min=4.27], keberkesanan</p><p>[Min=4.36] dan kepuasan [Min=4.40]. Ujian-t menunjukkan perbezaan yang</p><p>signifikan terhadap skor antara kumpulan kawalan dan eksperimen bagi konsep KG</p><p>[F=0.002, p=0.968], KK [F=8.59, p=0.005], dan HGK [F=3.95, p=0.051] manakala</p><p>tiada perbezaan yang signifikan terhadap konsep HPP [F=6.10 p=0.016]. Ujian-t juga</p><p>menunjukkan perbezaan yang signifikan antara pelajar lelaki dan perempuan terhadap</p><p>konsep KK [F=8.29, p=0.005] namun tiada perbezaan yang signifikan antara jantina</p><p>pelajar terhadap skor ujian KG, HGK dan HPP. Ujian-U Mann-Whitney pula</p><p>menunjukkan terdapat perbezaan skor yang signifikan antara pelajar lelaki kumpulan</p><p>kawalan dan eksperimen terhadap konsep HGK [U=19.5, z=-2.73, p=0.006] tetapi</p><p>tiada perbezaan signifikan antara jantina bagi kedua-dua kumpulan terhadap konsep</p><p>KG, KK, dan HPP. Oleh itu, kerangka alternatif yang disingkirkan adalah masingmasing</p><p>tujuh dan empat daripada kumpulan eksperimen dan kumpulan kawalan.</p><p>Kesimpulannya, intervensi menggunakan Modul BCG dalam pengajaran terbukti</p><p>dapat mengurangkan kerangka alternatif. Implikasi hasil kajian ialah Modul BCG ini</p><p>sesuai penggunaannya bagi meningkatkan penguasaan konsep asas genetik pelajar</p><p>Biologi.</p>
format thesis
qualification_name
qualification_level Master's degree
author Sahabuddin Basri
author_facet Sahabuddin Basri
author_sort Sahabuddin Basri
title Modul Basic Concepts in Genetics: intervensi tahap penguasaan dan kerangka alternatif konsep asas genetik pelajar Biologi tingkatan empat
title_short Modul Basic Concepts in Genetics: intervensi tahap penguasaan dan kerangka alternatif konsep asas genetik pelajar Biologi tingkatan empat
title_full Modul Basic Concepts in Genetics: intervensi tahap penguasaan dan kerangka alternatif konsep asas genetik pelajar Biologi tingkatan empat
title_fullStr Modul Basic Concepts in Genetics: intervensi tahap penguasaan dan kerangka alternatif konsep asas genetik pelajar Biologi tingkatan empat
title_full_unstemmed Modul Basic Concepts in Genetics: intervensi tahap penguasaan dan kerangka alternatif konsep asas genetik pelajar Biologi tingkatan empat
title_sort modul basic concepts in genetics: intervensi tahap penguasaan dan kerangka alternatif konsep asas genetik pelajar biologi tingkatan empat
granting_institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
granting_department Fakulti Sains dan Matematik
publishDate 2022
url https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=8756
_version_ 1776104564245659648
spelling oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:87562023-03-08 Modul Basic Concepts in Genetics: intervensi tahap penguasaan dan kerangka alternatif konsep asas genetik pelajar Biologi tingkatan empat 2022 Sahabuddin Basri LB Theory and practice of education <p>Kajian ini bertujuan membangun dan mengkaji kesan Modul Basic Concepts in</p><p>Genetics (BCG) terhadap penguasaan dan kerangka alternatif konsep asas genetik</p><p>pelajar Biologi. Konsep asas genetik yang dikaji ialah gen (KG), kromosom (KK),</p><p>hubungan gen, kromosom dan DNA (HGK) serta hubungan pembahagian sel dan</p><p>pewarisan (HPP). Kajian ini menggunakan pendekatan reka bentuk kajian</p><p>pembangunan berpandukan Model Sidek dan Jamaludin. Reka bentuk kuasi</p><p>eksperimen digunakan bagi menentukan keberkesanan modul. Seramai 64 pelajar</p><p>tingkatan empat dari dua buah sekolah di daerah Tawau dipilih melalui persampelan</p><p>rawak berstrata yang terdiri daripada 34 pelajar kumpulan eksperimen dan 30 pelajar</p><p>kumpulan kawalan. Instrumen kajian ialah Soal Selidik Persepsi Terhadap Modul dan</p><p>Ujian Pencapaian Konsep Asas Genetik. Data dianalisis secara deskriptif dan</p><p>inferensi. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan Modul BCG mempunyai kesahan yang baik</p><p>dengan indeks kesahan 0.94. Hasil analisis terhadap persepsi pelajar menunjukkan</p><p>nilai yang tinggi terhadap kualiti kandungan modul [Min=4.27], keberkesanan</p><p>[Min=4.36] dan kepuasan [Min=4.40]. Ujian-t menunjukkan perbezaan yang</p><p>signifikan terhadap skor antara kumpulan kawalan dan eksperimen bagi konsep KG</p><p>[F=0.002, p=0.968], KK [F=8.59, p=0.005], dan HGK [F=3.95, p=0.051] manakala</p><p>tiada perbezaan yang signifikan terhadap konsep HPP [F=6.10 p=0.016]. Ujian-t juga</p><p>menunjukkan perbezaan yang signifikan antara pelajar lelaki dan perempuan terhadap</p><p>konsep KK [F=8.29, p=0.005] namun tiada perbezaan yang signifikan antara jantina</p><p>pelajar terhadap skor ujian KG, HGK dan HPP. Ujian-U Mann-Whitney pula</p><p>menunjukkan terdapat perbezaan skor yang signifikan antara pelajar lelaki kumpulan</p><p>kawalan dan eksperimen terhadap konsep HGK [U=19.5, z=-2.73, p=0.006] tetapi</p><p>tiada perbezaan signifikan antara jantina bagi kedua-dua kumpulan terhadap konsep</p><p>KG, KK, dan HPP. Oleh itu, kerangka alternatif yang disingkirkan adalah masingmasing</p><p>tujuh dan empat daripada kumpulan eksperimen dan kumpulan kawalan.</p><p>Kesimpulannya, intervensi menggunakan Modul BCG dalam pengajaran terbukti</p><p>dapat mengurangkan kerangka alternatif. Implikasi hasil kajian ialah Modul BCG ini</p><p>sesuai penggunaannya bagi meningkatkan penguasaan konsep asas genetik pelajar</p><p>Biologi.</p> 2022 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=8756 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=8756 text zsm closedAccess Masters Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Sains dan Matematik <p>Abdu Raheem, B. O. (2012). The influence of gender on secondary school students</p><p>academic performance in South-West, Nigeria. Journal of Social Sciences,</p><p>31(1), 93-98. diambil daripada</p><p>https://doi.org/10.1080/09718923.2012.11893018</p><p></p><p>Abdulatip, Suratsih, Henuhili Rahayu, Henuhili, V., & Rahayu, T. (2015).</p><p>Penyusunan bahan ajar genetika dalam bentuk modul pembelajaran berbasis</p><p>fenomena lokal. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Sains, 3(1), 59-64.</p><p></p><p>Abu Bakar, N. (1995). Penilaian afektif. Kajang, Malaysia: Masa Enterprise.</p><p></p><p>Ada, E. E. (2019). The effect of gender, self concept, socioeconomic status ofparents</p><p>and type of school on students general academic achievement & students</p><p>achievement in Biology:A case study of senior secondary school students in</p><p>the Calabar Municipality, Nigeria. International Journal of Trend in Scientific</p><p>Research and Development, 3(2), 194-201. doi:10.31142/ijtsrd20278</p><p></p><p>Ahmann, J. S., & Glock, M. D. (1981). Evaluating students progress: Principles of</p><p>test and measurement. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, Inc.</p><p>Ahmed, M. A., Opatola, Y. M., Yahaya, L., & Sulaiman, M. M. (2018). Identification</p><p>of alternative conceptions of genetics held by senior school students in Ilorin,</p><p>Nigeria, using a three-tier diagnostic test. KIU Journal of Social Sciences, 4(1),</p><p>97-104.</p><p></p><p>Akmalia, R. M., & Sri Nurhayati, P. (2013). Pengembangan modul ipa terpadu</p><p>berkarakter tema pemanasan global untuk siswa smp/mts. Unnes Science</p><p>Education Journal, 2(1), 203-208. doi:10.15294/USEJ.V2I1.1824</p><p></p><p>Akyurek, E., & Afacan, . (2012). Determining the 8th grade students</p><p>misconceptions in the unit of Cell Division by using Roundhouse</p><p>diagramming. Uluslararas Eitim Programlar ve retim almalar</p><p>Dergisi, 2(3), 47-58. diambil daripada</p><p>http://www.ijocis.com/index.php/ijocis/article/view/70/55</p><p></p><p>Alonemarera, A. (2020). Identifikasi miskonsepsi mahasiswa pendidikan biologi pada</p><p>materi genetika menggunakan certainty of response indeks (Cri). Jurnal Biotek,</p><p>8(2), 109-122. doi:10.24252/jb.v8i2.16320</p><p></p><p>Altunolu, B. D., & eker, M. (2015). The understandings of genetics concepts and</p><p>learning approach of pre-service science teachers. Journal of Educational and</p><p>Social Research, 5(1), 61-66. doi:10.5901/jesr.2015.v5n1s1p61</p><p></p><p>Amalia, M., & Sidek, M. N. (2013). An application of the Sidek module development</p><p>in REBT counseling intervention module design for orphans. Procedia -</p><p>Social and Behavioral Sciences, 84(2013), 1481-1491.</p><p>doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.777</p><p></p><p>Amar, G. I., Suranto, S., & Sajidan, S. (2020). The use of a creative problem solving</p><p>based genetic mutation module in higher education. International Journal of</p><p>Higher Education, 10(3), 33-45. doi:10.5430/ijhe.v10n3p33</p><p></p><p>Amir Hoseyn, M. D. (2012). Kagan cooperative learning model: The bridge to foreign</p><p>language learning in the third millennium. Theory and Practice in Language</p><p>Studies, 2(6), 1134-1140. doi:10.4304/tpls.2.6.1134-1140</p><p></p><p>Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological testing (7th ed.). New Jersey:</p><p>Prentice Hall.</p><p></p><p>Ang, C. T., & Lee, L. W. (2016). Instrumen penilaian kualiti untuk modul pengajaran :</p><p>Pengujian ciri psikometrik. Jurnal Kurikulum dan Pengajaran Asia Pasifik,</p><p>4(4), 25-43. diambil daripada https://juku.um.edu.my/article/view/8209/5680</p><p></p><p>Anggraini, A., & Sukardi, S. (2015). Pengembangan modul prakarya dan</p><p>kewirausahaan materi pengolahan berbasis product-oriented bagi peserta didik</p><p>smk. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 5(3), 287. doi:10.21831/jpv.v5i3.6484</p><p></p><p>Ardiansyah, R., Corebima, A. D., & Rohman, F. (2017). Pengembangan bahan ajar</p><p>mutasi genetik pada matakuliah genetika. Jurnal Pendidikan : Teori,</p><p>Penelitian dan Pengembangan, 2(7), 927-933.</p><p></p><p>Ari, D., & Sadi, O. (2019). Effectiveness of cooperative learning on students'</p><p>achievement in genetics, self-efficacy, and conceptions of learning Biology.</p><p>Inquiry in Education, 11(2), 1-20.</p><p></p><p>Arman, I. M. (2020). Effectiveness of blending the Posner and Stepans models of</p><p>conceptual change in correcting misconceptions in 9th grade students.</p><p>International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 7(4), 10-17.</p><p>doi:10.14445/23942703/ijhss-v7i4p102</p><p></p><p>Aronson, E., Stephan, C., Sikes, J., Blaney, N., & Snapp, M. (1978). The Jigsaw</p><p>classroom. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publication.</p><p></p><p>Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Rozavieh, A. (1972). Introduction to research in education.</p><p>New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.</p><p></p><p>Astuti, L. S. (2017). Penguasaan konsep IPA ditinjau dari konsep diri dan minat</p><p>belajar siswa. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 7(1), 40-45.</p><p>doi:10.30998/formatif.v7i1.1293</p><p></p><p>Atilboz, N. G. (2004). Understanding levels and concept misconceptions of high</p><p>school 1 year students on mitosis and Parsley division topics. Gazi Eitim</p><p>Fakltesi Dergisi, 24(3), 147-157.</p><p></p><p>Aydin, G., & Balim, A. G. (2013). Students misconceptions related to subjects of cell</p><p>division and heredity. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 2,</p><p>338-348.</p><p></p><p>Bahar, M. (2003). Misconceptions in biology education and conceptual change</p><p>strategies. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 3(1), 55-64.</p><p></p><p>Bailey, J. (2004). The validation of a scale to measure school principals' attitudes</p><p>toward the inclusion of students with disabilities in regular schools. Australian</p><p>Psychologist, 39(1), 76-87. doi:10.1080/00050060410001660371</p><p></p><p>Barroso, C., Carrion, G. C., Roldan, J. L., & Wang, H. (2010). Applying maximum</p><p>likehood and PLS on different sample sizes: Studies on SERVQUAL model</p><p>and employee behavior model. In V. E. Vinzi, W. W. Chin, & J.</p><p>Henseler (Eds.), Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and</p><p>applications (pp. 427-448). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.</p><p></p><p>Basri, S. (2007). Miskonsepsi berkaitan konsep asas genetik dalam kalangan bakal</p><p>guru Pendidikan Sains (Biologi) (Tesis tidak diterbitkan). Universiti</p><p>Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjong Malim, Perak.</p><p></p><p>Battistich, V., Solomon, D., & Delucchi, K. (1993). Interaction processes and student</p><p>outcomes in cooperative learning groups. The Elementary School Journal,</p><p>94(1), 19-32. doi:10.1086/461748</p><p></p><p>Batzli, J. M., Smith, A. R., Williams, P. H., McGee, S. A., Dsa, K., & Pfammatter, J.</p><p>(2014). Beyond Punnett squares: Student word association and explanations of</p><p>phenotypic variation through an integrative quantitative genetics unit</p><p>investigating anthocyanin inheritance and expression in Brassica rapa fast</p><p>plants. CBELife Sciences Education, 13(3), 410-424.</p><p>doi:10.1187/cbe.13-12-0232</p><p></p><p>Bhattacharjee, J. (2015). Constructivist approach to learningAn effective approach of</p><p>teaching learning. International Research Journal of Interdisciplinary &</p><p>Multidisciplinary Studies (IRJIMS), 1(6), 65-74. diambil daripada</p><p>http://oaji.net/articles/2015/1707-1438677336.pdf</p><p></p><p>Black, J. A., & Champion, D. J. (1976). Methods and issues in social research. New</p><p>York: Wiley.</p><p></p><p>Bloom, B. S. (1977). Favorable learning conditions for all. Teacher, 95(3), 22-28.</p><p></p><p>Borg, W. R., Gall, J. P., & Gall, M. D. (1993). Applying educational research: A</p><p>practical guide (3rd ed.). New York: Longman.</p><p></p><p>Bozda, H. C., & Ok, G. (2019). Determination of the knowledge awareness and</p><p>misconceptions of sixth grade students about the cell with four tier test.</p><p>Adyaman niversitesi Eitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(1), 200-226.</p><p>doi:10.17984/adyuebd.413369</p><p></p><p>Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. New York, NY:</p><p>Springer.</p><p></p><p>Broadwell, M. M. (1969). Teaching for learning. The Gospel Guardian, 20(41), 1-3.</p><p>diambil daripada</p><p>http://www.wordsfitlyspoken.org/gospel_guardian/v20/v20n41p3_image.html</p><p></p><p>Buerah, T., Shanah, N., & Hamimah, A. N. (2015). Delinkuen pelajar dan cadangan</p><p>penyelesaiannya menerusi model pembangungan sahsiah remaja/pelajar</p><p>muslim bersepadu. Jurnal Hadhari, 7(2), 11-30.</p><p></p><p>CastroFaix, M., Duncan, R. G., & Choi, J. (2020). Datadriven refinements of a</p><p>genetics learning progression. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(1),</p><p>3-39. doi:10.1002/tea.21631</p><p></p><p>Celikler, D., & Aksan, Z. (2014). Determination of knowledge and misconceptions of</p><p>pre-service elementary science teachers about the greenhouse effect by</p><p>drawing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 136, 452-456.</p><p>doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.355</p><p></p><p>Chan, S., & Pollard, D. E. (2001). An encyclopaedia of translation: Chinese - English,</p><p>English - Chinese. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.</p><p></p><p>Chapman, A., & Georgiou, M. (2021). Powerful knowledge building and conceptual</p><p>change research: Learning from research on 'historical accounts' in England</p><p>and Cyprus. In A. Chapman (Ed.), Knowing history in schools (pp. 72-96).</p><p>London: UCL Press.</p><p></p><p>Chattopadhyay, A. (2005). Understanding of genetic information in higher secondary</p><p>students in Northeast India and the implications for genetics education. Cell</p><p>Biology Education, 4(1), 97-104. doi:10.1187/cbe.04-06-0042</p><p></p><p>Chattopadhyay, A. (2012). Understanding of mitosis and meiosis in higher secondary</p><p>students of Northeast India and the implications for genetics education.</p><p>Education, 2(3), 41-47. doi:10.5923/j.edu.20120203.04</p><p></p><p>Chen, Y. T., & Wang, J. H. (2016). Analyzing with Posners conceptual change</p><p>model and Toulmins model of argumentative demonstration in senior high</p><p>school students mathematic learning. International Journal of Information</p><p>and Education Technology, 6(6), 457-464. doi:10.7763/ijiet.2016.v6.732</p><p></p><p>Chi, M. T. (2005). Commonsense conceptions of emergent processes: Why some</p><p>misconceptions are robust. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 161-199.</p><p>doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1402_1</p><p></p><p>Chi, M. T., & Roscoe, R. D. (2002). The process and challenges of conceptual change.</p><p>In M. Limn & L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in</p><p>theory and practice. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.</p><p></p><p>Cimer, S. O. (2017). What makes a change unsuccessful through the eyes of teachers.</p><p>International Education Studies, 11(1), 81. doi:10.5539/ies.v11n1p81</p><p></p><p>Clapper, T. C. (2015). Cooperative-based learning and the zone of proximal</p><p>development. Simulation & Gaming, 46(2), 148-158.</p><p>doi:10.1177/1046878115569044</p><p></p><p>Clark, D. C., & Mathis, P. M. (2000). Modeling mitosis & meiosis: A</p><p>problem-solving activity. The American Biology Teacher, 62(3), 204-206.</p><p>doi:10.2307/4450874</p><p></p><p>Clement, J. (1982). Students preconceptions in introductory mechanics. American</p><p>Journal of Physics, 50(1), 66-71. doi:10.1119/1.12989</p><p></p><p>Cohen, J. W. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.).</p><p>Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.</p><p></p><p>Cooper, D., & Schindler, P. (2011). Business research methods (11th ed.). Boston:</p><p>McGraw Hill.</p><p></p><p>Cox, J. (2020, May 6). How to use the RoundRobin discussion teaching strategies.</p><p>diambil daripada</p><p>https://www.unige.ch/innovations-pedagogiques/application/files/1115/8877/8</p><p>105/Jorg_Balsiger_SocDur_How_to_Use_the_Round_Robin_Discussion_Tea</p><p>ching_Strategies.pdf</p><p></p><p>Cronbach, L. J. (1990). Essentials of education measurement. New Jersey:Prentice</p><p>Hall.</p><p></p><p>Dabell, J. (2019, January 27). The RoundRobin. Diambil pada 1 Januari, 2021,</p><p>daripada https://johndabell.com/2019/02/16/the-round-robin/</p><p></p><p>Defi Firman, S. (2014). Analisis penguasaan konsep dan miskonsepsi siswa sma pada</p><p>materi genetika (Master's thesis, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung,</p><p>Indonesia). Retrieved from http://repository.upi.edu/12639/</p><p></p><p>Dewi Murni. (2013). Identifikasi miskonsepsi mahasiswa pada konsep substansi</p><p>genetika menggunakan Certainty of Response Index (CRI). Prosiding</p><p>Semirata FMIPA Universitas Lampung, 1(1), 205-2011.</p><p></p><p>Dewi, P. Y., & Primayana, K. H. (2019). Effect of learning module with setting</p><p>contextual teaching and learning to increase the understanding of concepts.</p><p>International Journal of Education and Learning, 1(1), 19-26.</p><p>doi:10.31763/ijele.v1i1.26</p><p></p><p>Dikmenli, M. (2010). Misconceptions of cell division held by student teachers in</p><p>biology: A drawing analysis. Scientific Research and Essay, 5(2), 235-247.</p><p>diambil daripada</p><p>https://academicjournals.org/article/article1380539915_Dikmenli.pdf</p><p></p><p>Dixit, S., Bhardwaj, U. D., & Aniyan, A. T. (2020). A quasi-experimental study to</p><p>evaluate the effectiveness of self-instructional module (SIM) regarding</p><p>non-communicable diseases (NCD) among nursing officers in terms of</p><p>knowledge. International Journal of Nursing & Midwifery Research, 6(4),</p><p>8-12. doi:10.24321/2455.9318.201926</p><p></p><p>Dorji, J., Tamang, S., Tshewang, T., Dorji, T., & Dorji, T. Y. (2018). Genetic</p><p>diversity and population structure of three traditional horse breeds of Bhutan</p><p>based on 29 DNA microsatellite markers. Plos One 13(6), 1-11.</p><p>doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0199376</p><p></p><p>Duda, H. J. (2016). International Conference On Education. Malang, Indonesia:</p><p>Graduate School, Universitas Negeri Malang.</p><p></p><p>Duncan, R. G., & Reiser, B. J. (2007). Reasoning across ontologically distinct levels:</p><p>Students' understandings of molecular genetics. Journal of Research in</p><p>Science Teaching, 44(7), 938-959. doi:10.1002/tea.20186</p><p></p><p>Duncan, R. G., & Tseng, K. A. (2010). Designing project-based instruction to foster</p><p>generative and mechanistic understandings in genetics. Science Education,</p><p>95(1), 21-56. doi:10.1002/sce.20407</p><p></p><p>Duncan, R. G., Castro-Faix, M., & Choi, J. (2014). Informing a learning progression</p><p>in genetics: Which should be taught first, Mendelian inheritance or the central</p><p>dogma of molecular biology? International Journal of Science and</p><p>Mathematics Education, 14(3), 445-472. doi:10.1007/s10763-014-9568-3</p><p></p><p>Duncan, R. G., Choi, J., Castro-Faix, M., & Cavera, V. L. (2017). A study of two</p><p>instructional sequences informed by alternative learning progressions in</p><p>genetics. Science & Education, 26(10), 1115-1141.</p><p>doi:10.1007/s11191-017-9932-0</p><p></p><p>Duncan, R. G., Rogat, A. D., & Yarden, A. (2009). A learning progression for</p><p>deepening students' understandings of modern genetics across the 5th-10th</p><p>grades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 655-674.</p><p>doi:10.1002/tea.20312</p><p></p><p>Dwisetyaningrum, Y., Sarwanto, S., & Aminah, N. S. (2019). Pengembangan modul</p><p>fisika sma berbasis science technology society pada materi elastisitas untuk</p><p>meningkatkan motivasi belajar dan hasil belajar siswa. INKUIRI: Jurnal</p><p>Pendidikan IPA, 8(1), 29-39. doi:10.20961/inkuiri.v8i1.31806</p><p></p><p>Ebel, R. I. (1972). Essentials of educational measurement. New Jersey: Prentice Hall,</p><p>Inc.</p><p></p><p>Edward, G. C., & Richard, A. Z. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment. USA:</p><p>Sage Publication, Inc.</p><p></p><p>Emre, I., & Bahsi, M. (2006). Misconceptions of science teacher candidates about cell</p><p>division. Research of Eastern Anatolia Region, 4(3), 70-73.</p><p></p><p>Eryilmaz, M., & Cigdemoglu, C. (2018). Individual flipped learning and cooperative</p><p>flipped learning: Their effects on students performance, social, and computer</p><p>anxiety. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(4), 432-442.</p><p>doi:10.1080/10494820.2018.1522652</p><p></p><p>Etobro, A. B., & Banjoko, S. (2017). Misconceptions of genetics concepts among</p><p>pre-service teachers. Global Journal of Educational Research, 16(2), 121-128.</p><p>doi:10.4314/gjedr.v16i2.6</p><p></p><p>Etobro, A. B., & Fabinu, O. E. (2017). Students perceptions of difficult concepts in</p><p>biology in senior secondary schools in Lagos state. Global Journal of</p><p>Educational Research, 16(2), 139-147. doi:10.4314/gjedr.v16i2.8</p><p></p><p>Fadlillah, M. (2018). Persepsi mahasiswa PG-PAUD Universitas Muhammadiyah</p><p>Ponorogo terhadap PAUD di Kabupaten Ponorogo,. Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal</p><p>Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 2(1), 117-127.</p><p></p><p>Fairuz, M., Mohammad, S., & Mohd Sollah, M. (2019). Persepsi pelajar terhadap</p><p>Modul Cerita Nahu (MCN). Asia Pasific Online Journal of Arabic Studies,</p><p>3(1), 116. Retrieved from</p><p>http://mjs.um.edu.my/index.php/APOJAS/article/view/21816</p><p></p><p>Fantuzzo, J. W., King, J. A., & Heller, L. R. (1992). Effects of reciprocal peer</p><p>tutoring on mathematics and school adjustment: A component analysis.</p><p>Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 331-339.</p><p>doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.331</p><p></p><p>Fauzi, A., & Mitalistiani, M. (2018). High school biology topics that perceived</p><p>difficult by undergraduate students. Didaktika Biologi: Jurnal Penelitian</p><p>Pendidikan Biologi, 2(2), 73-84. doi:10.32502/dikbio.v2i2.1242</p><p></p><p>Fredricks, J. A., Hofkens, T., Wang, M., Mortenson, E., & Scott, P. (2017).</p><p>Supporting girls and boys engagement in math and science learning: A</p><p>mixed methods study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(2),</p><p>271-298. doi:10.1002/tea.21419</p><p></p><p>Gable, R. K., & Wolf, M. B. (1993). Instrument development in the affective domain:</p><p>Measuring attitudes and values in corporate and school settings (2nd ed.).</p><p>doi:10.1007/978-94-011-1400-4</p><p></p><p>Gallagher, J. M., & Reid, D. K. (2002). The learning theory of Piaget & Inhelder. NE:</p><p>Author Choice Press.</p><p></p><p>Garba, A., Ismail, N., Osman, S., & Rameli, M. R. (2020). Exploring peer effect on</p><p>mathematics anxiety among secondary school students of Sokoto state,</p><p>Nigeria through photovoice approach. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics,</p><p>Science and Technology Education, 16(2), 2-12. doi:10.29333/ejmste/112622</p><p></p><p>Geldsetzer, P., & Fawzi, W. (2017). Quasi-experimental study designs seriespaper</p><p>2: complementary approaches to advancing global health knowledge. Journal</p><p>of Clinical Epidemiology, 89, 12-16. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.03.015</p><p></p><p>Goldschmid, B., & Goldschmid, M. L. (1973). Modular instruction in higher</p><p>education: A review. Higher Education, 2(1), 15-32. doi:10.1007/bf00162534</p><p></p><p>Gonzlez, N., & Rossi, A. (2016). Examining pedagogical knowledge content on</p><p>mitosis in a university context. Multidisciplinary Journal for Education,</p><p>Social and Technological Sciences, 3(2), 79-106. doi:10.4995/muse.2016.4653</p><p></p><p>Grace, E. N. (2017). Facilitating students understanding of biological phenomena</p><p>using conceptual change instructional model in Enugu metropolis, Nigeria.</p><p>Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal, 8(4), 2775-2780.</p><p>doi:10.20533/licej.2040.2589.2017.0366</p><p></p><p>Greager, J., & Murray, D. (1991). The use of modules in college teaching. Nichols</p><p>Publishing Co., Inc.</p><p></p><p>Gurian, M., & Stevens, K. (2004). With boys and girls in mind. Educational</p><p>Leadership, 62(3), 21-26. diambil daripada</p><p>http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/nov04/vol62/num03/</p><p>With-Boys-and-Girls-in-Mind.aspx</p><p></p><p>Guskey, T. R. (2007). Closing achievement gaps: Revisiting Benjamin S. Blooms</p><p>learning for mastery. Journal of Advanced Academics, 19(1), 8-31. diambil</p><p>daripada https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.4219/jaa-2007-704</p><p></p><p>Gusmalini, A., Wulandari, S., & Zulfarina. (2020). Universitas Riau International</p><p>Conference on Science and Environment 2020 (URICSE-2020). Riau,</p><p>Indonesia: IOP Publishing.</p><p></p><p>Hackling, M. W., & Treagust, D. (1984). Research data necessary for meaningful</p><p>review of grade ten high school genetics curricula. Journal of Research in</p><p>Science Teaching, 21(2), 197-209. doi:10.1002/tea.3660210210</p><p></p><p>Hadjichambis, A. C., Georgiou, Y., Paraskeva-Hadjichambi, D., Kyza, E. A., &</p><p>Mappouras, D. (2015). Investigating the effectiveness of an inquiry-based</p><p>intervention on human reproduction in relation to students gender, prior</p><p>knowledge and motivation for learning in biology. Journal of Biological</p><p>Education, 50(3), 261-274. doi:10.1080/00219266.2015.1067241</p><p></p><p>Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer om partial least</p><p>squares structural equation modelling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.</p><p></p><p>Hakim, A., Liliasari, L., Kadarohman, A., & Syah, Y. M. (2016). Effects of the</p><p>natural product mini project laboratory on the students conceptual</p><p>understanding. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 13(2), 27-36. diambil</p><p>daripada https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10165a</p><p></p><p>Hall, J. (2012). Gender issues in mathematics: An Ontario perspective. Journal of</p><p>Teaching and Learning, 8(1). doi:10.22329/jtl.v8i1.3004</p><p></p><p>Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., Carter, S. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2000).</p><p>Short-term and long-term consequences of achievement goals: Predicting</p><p>interest and performance over time. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2),</p><p>316-330. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.2.316</p><p></p><p>Haskel-Ittah, M., & Yarden, A. (2018). Students conception of genetic phenomena</p><p>and its effect on their ability to understand the underlying mechanism.</p><p>CBELife Sciences Education, 17(3), 1-9. doi:10.1187/cbe.18-01-0014</p><p></p><p>Hasnah, M., Zaidatun, T., & Baharuddin, A. (2014, August). Pengaruh gaya kognitif</p><p>terhadap pencapaian pelajar. Kertas dibentangkan pada Konvensyen</p><p>Antarabangsa Jiwa Pendidik 2014, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. diambil</p><p>daripada</p><p>https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270272732_PENGARUH_GAYA_</p><p>KOGNITIF_TERHADAP_PENCAPAIAN_PELAJAR</p><p></p><p>Hassan, M. N., Mustapha, R., Nik Yusuff, N. A., & Mansor, R. (2017). Development</p><p>of higher order thinking skills module in science primary school: Needs</p><p>analysis. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social</p><p>Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society,</p><p>International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences,</p><p>7(2), 624-628.</p><p></p><p>Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (2002). Young children's thinking about biological world</p><p>(1st ed.). New York, NY: Psychology Press.</p><p></p><p>Hayashi, Y., Fukamachi, K. I., & Komatsugawa, H. (2015, April). Collaborative</p><p>learning in computer programming courses that adopted the flipped</p><p>classroom. Kertas dibentangkan pada 2015 International Conference on</p><p>Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering, Taipei. diambil</p><p>daripada https://ieeexplore.ieee.org</p><p></p><p>Helmers, M. J., Youngquist, T. D., & Grudens-Schuck, N. (2019). Novel use if</p><p>conceptual change framework improves video on challenging science topic.</p><p>Journal of Extension, 57(1), 1-4. Retrieved from</p><p>https://www.nrem.iastate.edu/research/STRIPS/files/publication/novel_use_of</p><p>_conceptual_change_framework_improves_video_on_challenging_science_to</p><p>pic.pdf</p><p></p><p>Hemmerich, J. A., Van Voorhis, K., & Wiley, J. (2016). Anomalous evidence,</p><p>confidence change, and theory change. Cognitive Science, 40(6), 1534-1560.</p><p>doi:10.1111/cogs.12289</p><p></p><p>Heri, S., Steven, O., & Mutiara, G. P. (2018). Isu kesetaraan gender dalam optik</p><p>feminist. Jurisprudence, 5(2), 121-140. diambil daripada</p><p>journal.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/Jurisprudent</p><p></p><p>Hobri, Dafik, & Anowar, H. (2018). The implementation of learning together in</p><p>improving students mathematical performance. International Journal of</p><p>Instruction, 11(2), 483-496. doi:10.12973/iji.2018.11233a</p><p></p><p>Hobri. (2010). Metodologi penelitian pengembangan (Aplikasi pada penelitian</p><p>pendidikan matematika). Jember, Indonesia: Pena Salsabila.</p><p></p><p>Jackson, S. L. (2006). Research methods and statistics : A critical thinking approach</p><p>(2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Higher Education.</p><p></p><p>Jibrin, A. G., & Zayum, D. S. (2012). Effect of concept mapping teaching strategy on</p><p>the academic achievement of senior secondary school students in genetics.</p><p>Journal of Science, Technology & Education, 1(1), 49-53. Retrieved from</p><p>https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270592954</p><p></p><p>Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Impact ff cooperative-team learning on</p><p>performance and retention (NOOO1 4-87-K-021 8). diambil daripada</p><p>University of Minnesota website:</p><p>https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235154420_Impact_of_Cooperative-</p><p>Team_Learning_on_Performance_and_Retention_of_Navy_Air-Traffic_Contr</p><p>oller_Trainees</p><p></p><p>Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Holubec, E. J. (1990). Circles of learning :</p><p>Cooperation in the classroom (3rd ed.). Edina, MI: Interaction Book Co.,.</p><p></p><p>Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (2013). Cooperative learning:</p><p>Improving university instruction by basing practice on validated theory.</p><p>Retrieved from</p><p>https://karlsmithmn.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Johnson-Johnson-Smith-</p><p>Cooperative_Learning-JECT-Small_Group_Learning-draft.pdf</p><p></p><p>Johnstone, A. H., & Mahmoud, N. A. (1980). Isolating topics of high perceived</p><p>difficulty school biology. Journal of Biological Education, 14(2), 163-166.</p><p>doi:10.1080/00219266.1980.10668983</p><p></p><p>Juhairiah, J., Danaryanti, A., & Sukmawati, R. A. (2018). Pengembangan buku siswa</p><p>dengan pendekatan kontekstual pada materi persamaan linear satu variabel</p><p>untuk siswa sekolah menengah pertama. Edu-Mat: Jurnal Pendidikan</p><p>Matematika, 6(1). doi:10.20527/edumat.v6i1.5129</p><p></p><p>Juwantara, R. A. (2019). Analisis teori perkembangan kognitif Piaget pada tahap anak</p><p>usia operasional konkret 7-12 tahun dalam pembelajaran matematika.</p><p>Al-Adzka: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 9(1), 27.</p><p>doi:10.18592/aladzkapgmi.v9i1.3011</p><p></p><p>Kagan, S. (2003). A brief history of Kagan structures. diambil daripada</p><p>https://www.kaganonline.com/free_articles/dr_spencer_kagan/256/A-Brief-Hi</p><p>story-of-Kagan-Structures</p><p></p><p>Kalaian, S., Kasim, R., & Nims, J. (2018). Effectiveness of small-group learning</p><p>pedagogies in engineering and technology education: A meta-analysis.</p><p>Journal of Technology Education, 29(2), 20-35. doi:10.21061/jte.v29i2.a.2</p><p></p><p>Karsono, A. D. (1993). Konsep dan sistem pendidikan jarak jauh. Kuala Lumpur,</p><p>Malaysia: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.</p><p></p><p>Kerlinger, E. N. (1986). Foundations of behavioral research. New York: Holt,</p><p>Rinehart and Wiston.</p><p></p><p>Khaerunnisa, E. (2016). Studi deskriptif adversity quotient matematis. Jurnal</p><p>Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 9(1), 83-92.</p><p></p><p>Khaerunnisa. (2020). Peningkatan keterampilan menulis karya ilmiah melalui</p><p>pendekatan kolaboratif. Stilistika: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra,</p><p>13(1), 61-66. doi:10.30651/st.v13i1.3762</p><p></p><p>Kiboss, J. K., Ndirangu, M., & Wekesa, E. W. (2004). Effectiveness of a</p><p>computer-mediated simulations program in school biology on pupils' learning</p><p>outcomes in cell theory. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(2),</p><p>207-213. doi:10.1023/b:jost.0000031259.76872.f1</p><p></p><p>Kil, D., Taber, K. S., & Winterbottom, M. (2016). A cross-national study of</p><p>students understanding of genetics concepts: Implications from similarities</p><p>and differences in England and Turkey. Education Research International,</p><p>2016, 1-14. doi:10.1155/2016/6539626</p><p></p><p>Kim, D., & Downey, S. (2016). Examining the use of the ASSURE model by K12</p><p>teachers. Computers in the Schools, 33(3), 153-168.</p><p>doi:10.1080/07380569.2016.1203208</p><p></p><p>King, C. J. (2009). An analysis of misconceptions in science textbooks: Earth science</p><p>in England and Wales. International Journal of Science Education, 32(5),</p><p>565-601. doi:10.1080/09500690902721681</p><p></p><p>Kirk, J., & Miller, M. L. (1986). Reliability and validity in qualitative research.</p><p>doi:10.4135/9781412985659</p><p></p><p>Kiwanuka, H. N., Van Damme, J., Van Den Noortgate, W., Anumendem, D. N.,</p><p>Vanlaar, G., Reynolds, C., & Namusisi, S. (2016). How do student and</p><p>classroom characteristics affect attitude toward mathematics? A multivariate</p><p>multilevel analysis. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 28(1), 1-21.</p><p>doi:10.1080/09243453.2016.1201123</p><p></p><p>Knippels, M. P., Waarlo, A. J., & Boersma, K. T. (2005). Design criteria for learning</p><p>and teaching genetics. Journal of Biological Education, 39(3), 108-112.</p><p>doi:10.1080/00219266.2005.9655976</p><p></p><p>Kuhn, T. S. (1970). Reflections on my critics. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.),</p><p>Criticism and the growth of knowledge (p. 231278). Cambridge: Cambridge</p><p>University Press.</p><p></p><p>Kumanda, B., Ateskan, A., & Lane, J. (2018). Misconceptions in biology: A</p><p>meta-synthesis study of research, 20002014. Journal of Biological Education,</p><p>53(4), 350-364. doi:10.1080/00219266.2018.1490798</p><p></p><p>Kurt, H., Ekici, G., Aksu, ., & Akta, M. (2013). Determining cognitive structures</p><p>and alternative conceptions on the concept of reproduction (The case of</p><p>pre-service biology teachers). Creative Education, 04(09), 572-587.</p><p>doi:10.4236/ce.2013.49083</p><p></p><p>Laal, M., & Laal, M. (2012). Collaborative learning: What is it? Procedia - Social and</p><p>Behavioral Sciences, 31, 491-495. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.092</p><p></p><p>Laila Puspita. (2019). Pengembangan modul berbasis keterampilan proses sains</p><p>sebagai bahan ajar dalam pembelajaran biologi. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan</p><p>IPA, 5(1), 79-88. doi:10.21831/jipi.v5i1.22530</p><p></p><p>Laimeheriwa, B. M. (2018). The genetic research methods and its role in aquaculture</p><p>on Indonesia. Oceanography & Fisheries Open access Journal, 8(3), 1-23.</p><p>doi:10.19080/ofoaj.2018.08.555738</p><p></p><p>LaningaWijnen, L., Harakeh, Z., Garandeau, C. F., Dijkstra, J. K., Veenstra, R., &</p><p>Vollebergh, W. A. (2019). Classroom popularity hierarchy predicts prosocial</p><p>and aggressive popularity norms across the school year. Child Development,</p><p>90(5), 637-653. doi:10.1111/cdev.13228</p><p></p><p>Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia. (2018). Kupasan mutu jawapan SPM 2017 Biologi 2</p><p>4551/2. diambil daripada Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia website:</p><p>http://lp.moe.gov.my/images/bahan/spm/KMJ/KMJ_SPM_2017/BIOLOGI%2</p><p>02%20(4551_2).pdf</p><p></p><p>Lewis, J., & Kattmann, U. (2004). Traits, genes, particles and information: Revisiting</p><p>students understandings of genetics. International Journal of Science</p><p>Education, 26(2), 195-206. doi:10.1080/0950069032000072782</p><p></p><p>Lewis, J., & Wood-Robinson, C. (2000). Genes, chromosomes, cell division and</p><p>inheritance - do students see any relationship? International Journal of</p><p>Science Education, 22(2), 177-195. doi:10.1080/095006900289949</p><p></p><p>Lewis, J., Leach, J., & Wood-Robinson, C. (2000a). All in the genes? young</p><p>people's understanding of the nature of genes. Journal of Biological Education,</p><p>34(2), 74-79. doi:10.1080/00219266.2000.9655689</p><p></p><p>Lewis, J., Leach, J., & Wood-Robinson, C. (2000c). What's in a cell? young</p><p>people's understanding of the genetic relationship between cells, within an</p><p>individual. Journal of Biological Education, 34(3), 129-132.</p><p>doi:10.1080/00219266.2000.9655702</p><p></p><p>Lindberg, S. M., Hyde, J. S., Petersen, J. L., & Linn, M. C. (2010). New trends in</p><p>gender and mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin,</p><p>136(6), 1123-1135. doi:10.1037/a0021276</p><p></p><p>Linke, R. D., & Venz, M. I. (1979). Misconceptions in physical science among</p><p>non-science background students: II. Research in Science Education, 9(1),</p><p>103-109. doi:10.1007/bf02359149</p><p></p><p>Longden, B. (1982). Geneticsare there inherent learning difficulties? Journal of</p><p>Biological Education, 16(2), 135-140. doi:10.1080/00219266.1982.9654439</p><p></p><p>Luksa, T., Radanovis, I., Garasis, D., & Sertis Peris, M. (2016). Misconceptions of</p><p>primary and high school students related tothe biological concept of human</p><p>reproduction,cell life cycle and molecular basis of heredity. Journal of Turkish</p><p>Science Education, 13(3), 143-160. diambil daripada</p><p>https://bib.irb.hr/datoteka/845394.Luksa_i_sur_2016.pdf</p><p></p><p>Machov, M., & Ehler, E. (2021). Secondary school students misconceptions in</p><p>genetics: Origins and solutions. Journal of Biological Education, 1-14.</p><p>doi:10.1080/00219266.2021.1933136</p><p></p><p>Majzub, R. M., & Rais, M. M. (2010). Boys underachievement: Male versus female</p><p>teachers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7, 685-690.</p><p>doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.10.093</p><p></p><p>Marshall, P. A. (2008). Mapping linked genes in drosophila melanogaster using data</p><p>from the F2 generation of a dihybrid cross. The American Biology Teacher,</p><p>70(9), 554-556. doi:10.2307/27669342</p><p></p><p>Marshall, P. (2006). The power to transform: Leadership that brings learning and</p><p>schooling to life. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.</p><p></p><p>Mbajiorgu, N. M., Ezechi, N. G., & Idoko, E. C. (2007). Addressing nonscientific</p><p>presuppositions in genetics using a conceptual cha</p><p></p><p>McGuirk, P. M., & O'Neill, P. (2016). Using questionnaires in qualitative human</p><p>geography. In I. Hay (Ed.), Qualitative research methods in human geography</p><p>(pp. 246-273). (pp. 246-273). Don Mills, Canada: Oxford University Press.</p><p></p><p>Meade, M. E., Wammes, J. D., & Fernandes, M. A. (2018). Drawing as an encoding</p><p>tool: Memorial benefits in younger and older adults. Experimental Aging</p><p>Research, 44(5), 369-396. doi:10.1080/0361073x.2018.1521432</p><p></p><p>Mensah, F. K., & Kiernan, K. E. (2010). Gender differences in educational attainment:</p><p>Influences of the family environment. British Educational Research Journal,</p><p>36(2), 239-260. doi:10.1080/01411920902802198</p><p></p><p>Mertens, T. R., & Walker, J. O. (1992). A paper-& pencil strategy for teaching</p><p>mitosis & meiosis, diagnosing learning problems & predicting examination</p><p>performance. The American Biology Teacher, 54(8), 470-474.</p><p>doi:10.2307/4449552</p><p></p><p>Midgley, C. (2002). Goals, goal structures, and patterns of adaptive learning. diambil</p><p>daripada</p><p>https://www.questia.com/library/104586992/goals-goal-structures-and-pattern</p><p>s-of-adaptive-learning</p><p></p><p>Mital, S., Musunuru, K., Garg, V., Russell, M. W., Lanfear, D. E., Gupta, R. M., </p><p>Hickey, K. T. (2016). Enhancing literacy in cardiovascular genetics: A</p><p>scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation:</p><p>Cardiovascular Genetics, 9(5), 448-467. doi:10.1161/hcg.0000000000000031</p><p></p><p>Mohd Majid, K. (1998). Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan (4th ed.). Kuala Lumpur:</p><p>Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.</p><p></p><p>Mohd Majid, K. (2005). Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur:Dewan</p><p>Bahasa & Pustaka.</p><p></p><p>Mohd Syaubari, O., & Ahmad Yusuf, K. (2018). Kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan</p><p>instrumen komposisi pengajaran guru pendidikan islam sekolah rendah yang</p><p>mengintegrasikan kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi (KBAT) menerusi pengajaran</p><p>akidah. Sains Humanika, 10(3). doi:10.11113/sh.v10n3.1297</p><p></p><p>Mohd Yusof, K., Wan Alwi, S., Sadikin, A., & Abdul Aziz, A. (2015). Inculcating</p><p>sustainability among first-year engineering students using cooperative</p><p>problem-based learning. Sustainability in Higher Education, 67-95.</p><p>doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-100367-1.00004-4</p><p></p><p>Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., & Kemp, J. E. (2001). Designing effective</p><p>instruction (3rd ed.). Michigan: Wiley.</p><p></p><p>Mosher, B. (2007, November 2). Is your learning about mastery or competency?</p><p>diambil daripada</p><p>https://www.chieflearningofficer.com/2007/11/02/is-your-learning-about-mast</p><p>ery-or-competency/</p><p></p><p>Muela, F. J., & Abril, A. M. (2014). Genetics and cinema: Personal misconceptions</p><p>that constitute obstacles to learning. International Journal of Science</p><p>Education, 4(3), 260-280. doi:10.1080/21548455.2013.817026</p><p></p><p>Muhammad Ridho, F. (2020). Efektivitas layanan bimbingan belajar melalui teknik</p><p>motivational interviewing untuk meningkatkan motivasi belajar peserta didik</p><p>kelas XI di SMAN 9 Bandar Lampung tahun pembelajaran 2019/2020</p><p>(Master's thesis, UIN Raden Intan, Lampung, Indonesia). diambil daripada</p><p>http://repository.radenintan.ac.id/id/eprint/12191</p><p></p><p>Muhammad Sabri, S., Nor Aziah, A., Zawawi, I., & Nurulhuda, O. (2012). Employing</p><p>design and development research (DDR) approaches in design and</p><p>development of online arabic vocabulary learning games prototype. The</p><p>Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(2), 108-119. Retrieved</p><p>from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ989018</p><p></p><p>Muhammad Wahyu, S. (2017). Pengembangan modul pembelajaran biologi berbasis</p><p>pendekatan saintifik untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa. Journal of</p><p>Educational Science and Technology, 3(2), 102-112.</p><p>doi:10.26858/est.v3i2.3468</p><p></p><p>Mulyasa, E. (2006). Kurikulum berbasis kompetensi : Konsep, karakteristik,</p><p>implementasi, dan inovasi. Bandung, Indonesia: Remaja Rosdakarya.</p><p></p><p>Murray, G. T. (1985). The international encyclopedia of education. Oxford, UK:</p><p>Pergamon Press Ltd.</p><p></p><p>Murtafiah, M., & Amin, N. (2018). Pengaruh gaya kognitif dan gender terhadap</p><p>kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika. Jurnal Penelitian dan</p><p>Pembelajaran Matematika, 11(1), 75-82. doi:10.30870/jppm.v11i1.2986</p><p></p><p>Musa, A. K., Dauda, B., & Umar, M. A. (2016). Gender differences in achievement</p><p>goals and performances in English Language and Mathematics of senior</p><p>secondary schools students in Borno State, Nigeria. Journal of Education and</p><p>Practice, 7(27), 165-175. diambil daripada</p><p>https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1115862.pdf</p><p></p><p>Muslimin, M. S., Mohd Nordin, N., Mansor, A. Z., & Md Yunus, M. (2017). The</p><p>design and development of MobiEko: A mobile educational app for</p><p>microeconomics module. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction</p><p>(Special Issue), 221-255. doi:10.32890/mjli.2017.7804</p><p></p><p>Newman, D. L., Catavero, C. M., & Wright, L. K. (2012). Students fail to transfer</p><p>knowledge of chromosome structure to topics pertaining to cell division.</p><p>CBELife Sciences Education, 11(4), 425-436. doi:10.1187/cbe.12-01-0003</p><p></p><p>Noperi, H., Sarwanto, S., & Aminah, N. S. (2021). Pengembangan modul ilustratif</p><p>berbasis inkuiri terbimbing bermuatan pendidikan karakter. Science and</p><p>Physics Education Journal, 4(2), 70-81. doi:10.31539/spej.v4i2.2392</p><p></p><p>Nopparatjamjomras, T. R. (2012). Developing a social constructivist teaching and</p><p>learning module on DNA for high school students in Thailand. In Biology</p><p>Education for Social and Sustainable Development (pp. 233-240). Brill.</p><p></p><p>Noraini, N., Sarina, M. N., Rushami, Z. Y., & Abdul Aziz, O. (2016). Isu kesahan</p><p>dalaman terhadap kaedah penyelidikan kuasi eksperimen di dalam pendidikan</p><p>keusahawanan. Asean Entrepreneuship Journal, 2(2), 90-97.</p><p></p><p>Norhashim, A. S., Mazenah, Y., & Rose Alinda, A. (1998). Pengajaran bantuan</p><p>komputer. Skudai : Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Nowak, G. T. (1986). Western Michigan University career guidance inventory</p><p>manual. Michigan: Western Michigan University Testing and Evaluation</p><p>Services.</p><p></p><p>Nur Fazirah, R., & Eng Tek, O. (2008). Keberkesanan penggunaan modul nota</p><p>mitosis dan meiosis dan sikap pelajar terhadap penggunaannya bagi Biologi</p><p>Tingkatan 4 (Tesis yang tidak diterbitkan). Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.</p><p></p><p>Nur Salimah, A., Huzili, H., Junainor, H., Nor Syamimi, M. A., Mohamad Hashim, 0.</p><p>O., & Kamarudin, H. (2018, February). Perception of teacher on cooperative</p><p>learning. Paper presented at Malaysia Technical Universities Conference on</p><p>Engineering and Technology (MUCET 2017), Universiti Malaysia Perlis.</p><p></p><p>Nur Syarima, S., Mariny, A. G., & Yahaya, M. (2020). Kesahan dan</p><p>kebolehpercayaan instrumen ketara sedar sekolah (KSS) dan pendidikan abad</p><p>ke-21 (PAK21) berdasarkan analisis PLS-SEM. International Journal of</p><p>Education and Pedagogy, 2(4), 106-119.</p><p></p><p>Nurhazwani, M. S., Najwa Husna, S., & Hafsah, T. (2020). Exploring pre-university</p><p>students manipulative skills and understanding on mitosis. Jurnal Pendidikan</p><p>Sains & Matematik Malaysia, 10(1), 1-8. diambil daripada</p><p>https://doi.org/10.37134/jpsmm.vol10.1.1.2020</p><p></p><p>Nurlaila, L., Sriyati, S., & Riandi, R. (2018). Preliminary studies of analyzing</p><p>misconception and scientific argumentation using diagnostic question clusters</p><p>(Dqcs) of molecular genetics concept. Jurnal BIOEDUIN : Program Studi</p><p>Pendidikan Biologi, 8(2), 43-53. doi:10.15575/bioeduin.v8i2.3190</p><p></p><p>Nurlaila, L., Sriyati, S., & Riandi. (2017). Analizing student biology education</p><p>misconception and scientific argumentation ability using diagnostic question</p><p>clusters (Dqcs) of molecular genetic concept. Journal of Physics: Conference</p><p>Series, 812, 1-7. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/812/1/012112</p><p></p><p>Nussbaum, J., & Novick, S. (1982). Alternative frameworks, conceptual conflict and</p><p>accommodation: Toward a principled teaching strategy. Instructional Science,</p><p>11, 183-200. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00414279</p><p></p><p>Nwagbo, C., & Obiekwe, C. (2010). Effects of constructivist instructional approach</p><p>on students achievement in basic ecological concepts in biology. Journal of</p><p>Science Teachers Association of Nigeria, 45(1), 26-35.</p><p></p><p>Olusegun, B. S. (2015). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for teaching and</p><p>learning. Journal of Research & Method in Education, 5(6), 66-70.</p><p>doi:10.9790/7388-05616670</p><p></p><p>Ong, E. T., & Tan, S. C. (2012). Keberkesanan kaedah Numbered Heads Together</p><p>terhadap pencapaian Biologi dalam kalangan pelajar di Universiti Pendidikan</p><p>Sultan Idris. Jurnal Teknologi, 53(1), 35-46. doi:10.11113/jt.v53.112</p><p></p><p>Orcan, F. (2020). Parametric or non-parametric: Skewness to test normality for mean</p><p>comparison. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 7(2),</p><p>236-246. doi:10.21449/ijate.656077</p><p></p><p>Othman, M. (2000). Prinsip psikoterapi dan pengurusan dalam kaunseling. Serdang,</p><p>Malaysia: Universiti Putra Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Ozcan, T., Yildirim, O., & Ozgur, S. (2012). Determining of the university freshmen</p><p>students misconceptions and alternative conceptions about mitosis and</p><p>meiosis. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 3677-3680.</p><p>doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.126</p><p></p><p>Oztap, H., Ozay, E., & Oztap, F. (2003). Teaching cell division to secondary school</p><p>students: An investigation of difficulties experienced by Turkish teachers.</p><p>Journal of Biological Education, 38(1), 13-15.</p><p>doi:10.1080/00219266.2003.9655890</p><p></p><p>Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using</p><p>IBM SPSS (6th ed.). China: Everbest Printing Co. Ltd.</p><p></p><p>Pasion, R. (2019). The efficacy of strategic intervention materials (SIMS) in teaching</p><p>social studies among third year high school students. SMCC Higher Education</p><p>Research Journal, 6(1), 175-187. doi:10.18868/sherj6j.06.010119.11</p><p></p><p>Patrick, A. O. (2012). Unequal achievement of science undergraduates: Does sex</p><p>influence the differences? US-China Education Review, 6, 578-594. diambil</p><p>daripada https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED535484.pdf</p><p></p><p>Perez-Felkner, L. (2015). Attitude differences and gender. In R. Gunstone (Ed.),</p><p>Encyclopedia of science education (pp. 93-94). doi:</p><p>10.1007/978-94-007-2150-0_351</p><p></p><p>Poh, B. T., & Ng, H. K. (2008). Kesan faktor jantina, etnik dan gaya kognitif ke atas</p><p>pencapaian Pengajian Am. Journal of Educators & Education, 23, 123-140.</p><p></p><p>Popi, S., Deby Putri, P., & Yesni, O. (2021, June 30). Pengembangan bahan ajar fisika</p><p>"Analisis model pengembangan bahan ajar (4D, ADDIE, ASSURE, Hannafin</p><p>dan Peck)". Retrieved from https://osf.io/preprints/inarxiv/7bydx/</p><p></p><p>Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982).</p><p>Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual</p><p>change. Science Education, 66(2), 211-227.</p><p></p><p>Prakash, M., Raj, B., Khanal, B., Krishna, R., & Belbase, S. (2021). Eighth grade</p><p>students misconceptions and errors in mathematics learning in Nepal.</p><p>European Journal of Educational Research, 10(3), 1101-1121.</p><p>doi:10.12973/eu-jer.10.3.1101</p><p></p><p>Prastyo, D. D., Amin, M., & Susanto, H. (2021). Effectiveness of genetic module to</p><p>reduce misconception levels and improve cognitive learning outcomes of</p><p>grade XII students of SMA Negeri 5 Malang. Journal of Disruptive Learning</p><p>Innovation (JODLI), Vol. 2 (2), 2021, 2(2), 89-97.</p><p></p><p>Price, C. G., Knee, E. M., Miller, J. A., Shin, D., Mann, J., Crist, D. K., Grotewold,</p><p>E. (2018). Following phenotypes: An exploration of mendelian genetics using</p><p>arabidopsis plants. The American Biology Teacher, 80(4), 291-300.</p><p>doi:10.1525/abt.2018.80.4.291</p><p></p><p>Quillin, K., & Thomas, S. (2015). Drawing-to-Learn: A framework for using</p><p>drawings to promote model-based reasoning in biology. CBELife Sciences</p><p>Education, 14(1), es2. doi:10.1187/cbe.14-08-0128</p><p></p><p>Radanovi, I., Luka, ., Garai, D., Basti, M, Markovi, N., Furlan, Z., Dolenec, T.,</p><p>Begi,V., Kapov, S., tigli, N. & Petra, T., I., Luka, T., Garai, D., Basti,</p><p>M., Markovi, N., Furlan, Z., & Dolenec, T. (2011). External evaluation</p><p>exams in Biology in the eighth grade in the school year 2010/2011 - Main</p><p>examination. (pp. 1-114). diambil daripada National Center for External</p><p>Evaluation of Education, Zagreb website:</p><p>http://dokumenti.ncvvo.hr/OS/Izvjesca/izvjesce_bio_2010_2011.pdf</p><p></p><p>Rafiee, J., & Hafsah, T. (2020). Analisis keperluan kebolehgunaan aplikasi mudah</p><p>alih terhadap sikap, minat dan pengetahuan asas matematik tahun 4. Jurnal</p><p>Pendidikan Sains & Matematik Malaysia, 10(1), 9-15.</p><p></p><p>Rahdiyanta, D. (2012). Teknik penyusunan modul [PDF]. diambil daripada</p><p>http://staffnew.uny.ac.id/staff/131569341</p><p></p><p>Ramli, I., Jamal, N., & Marinah, A. (2020). Analisis data dan pelaporan dalam</p><p>penyelidikan pendidikan. Tanjong Malim, Perak: Penerbit Universiti</p><p>Pendidikan Sultan Idris.</p><p></p><p>Ria Rosita. (2018). Improving the high school students' appeal and effectiveness in</p><p>the history learning through inquiry based digital module design. Social</p><p>Science Learning Education Journal, 03(12), 01-09.</p><p>doi:10.15520/sslej.v3i12.2377</p><p></p><p>Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2007). Design and development research. New Jersey,</p><p>NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.</p><p></p><p>Rodrguez Gil, S. G., Fradkin, M., & Castaeda-Sortibrn, A. N. (2019). Conceptions</p><p>of meiosis: Misunderstandings among university students and errors. Journal</p><p>of Biological Education, 53(2), 191-204.</p><p>doi:10.1080/00219266.2018.1469531</p><p></p><p>Rohaendi, S., & Laelasari, N. I. (2020). Penerapan teori Piaget dan Vygotsky ruang</p><p>lingkup bilangan dan aljabar pada siswa mts plus Karangwangi. Prisma, 9(1),</p><p>65. doi:10.35194/jp.v9i1.886</p><p></p><p>Roini, C., & Sundari. (2018). Using certainty of responses index (CRI) for assessment</p><p>to identify graduate students misconceptions in genetics. Proceedings of the</p><p>1st International Conference on Teaching and Learning.</p><p>doi:10.5220/0008899502110217</p><p></p><p>Roseman, J. E., Caldwell, A., Gogos, A., & Kurth, L. (2006). Mapping a coherent</p><p>learning progression for the molecular basis of heredity. diambil daripada</p><p>American Association for the Advancement of Science website:</p><p>http://www.project2061.org/publications/articles/papers/narst2006.pdf</p><p></p><p>Rosenberg, M. (2012, May 21). Beyond competence: Its the journey to mastery that</p><p>counts. Learning Solutions Magazine. diambil daripada</p><p>www.learningsolutionsmag.com/articles/930/beyondcompetence-its-the-journ</p><p>ey-to-masterythat-counts</p><p></p><p>Rotbain, Y., Marbach-Ad, G., & Stavy, R. (2007). Using a computer animation to</p><p>teach high school molecular biology. Journal of Science Education and</p><p>Technology, 17(1), 49-58. doi:10.1007/s10956-007-9080-4</p><p></p><p>Rotbain, Y., Marbach-Ad, G., & Stavy, R. (2005). Understanding molecular genetics</p><p>through a drawing-based activity. Journal of Biological Education, 39(4),</p><p>174-178. doi:10.1080/00219266.2005.9655992</p><p></p><p>Rulina, S. (2014). Penerapan model pembelajaran koperatif tipe student facilitator and</p><p>explaning untuk meningkatkan aktivitas belajar ips terpadu. Wahana Inovasi,</p><p>3(2), 384-399. diambil daripada http://penelitian.uisu.ac.id/</p><p></p><p>Russel, J. D. (1974). Modular instruction: A guide to the design, selection, utilization</p><p>and evaluation of modular materials. New York: Publishing Company.</p><p></p><p>Sadiah, B. (2008). Kesan paduan kitar pembelajaran dan pemetaan konsep terhadap</p><p>konsepsi pelajar tentang pembahagian sel (Disertasi kedoktoran, Universiti</p><p>Sains Malaysia, Gelugor, Pulau Pinang). diambil daripada</p><p>http://eprints.usm.my/id/eprint/9964</p><p></p><p>Safrida, S., Dewi, C. R., & Abdullah, A. (2017). Penggunaan modul dan media</p><p>animasi dalam mengurangi miskonsepsi siswa pada materi sistem peredaran</p><p>darah di SMAN 5 Kota Banda Aceh. Jurnal Pencerahan, 11(1), 39-45.</p><p></p><p>Saper, M. N., Mohd Daud, N. A., & Ahmad, N. (2016). Kesahan dan</p><p>kebolehpercayaan Modul I-Sc (Islamic spiritual counseling) ke atas pelajar</p><p>bermasalah tingkah laku. International Journal of Islamic Thought, 9(1),</p><p>32-43. doi:10.24035/ijit.09.2016.004</p><p></p><p>Sharifah Alwiah, A. (1981). Pengenalan pengajaran individu dengan tumpuan khas</p><p>kepada modul pengajaran dan modul pembelajaran. Pendidik dan Pendidikan,</p><p>3(1), 46-57. diambil daripada http://apjee.usm.my/vol03_1981.html</p><p></p><p>Shea, N. A., Duncan, R. G., & Stephenson, C. (2014). A tri-part model for genetics</p><p>literacy: Exploring undergraduate student reasoning about authentic genetics</p><p>dilemmas. Research in Science Education, 45(4), 485-507.</p><p>doi:10.1007/s11165-014-9433-y</p><p></p><p>Sidek, M. N. (1997). Modul penilaian dalam kaunseling. Serdang: Universiti Putra</p><p>Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Sidek, M. N., & Jamaludin, A. (2005). Pembinaan modul: Bagaimana membina</p><p>modul latihan dan modul akademik. Serdang, Malaysia: Universiti Putra</p><p>Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Siritunga, D., Montero-Rojas, M., Carrero, K., Toro, G., Vlez, A., &</p><p>Carrero-Martnez, F. A. (2011). Culturally relevant inquiry-based laboratory</p><p>module implementations in upper-division genetics and cell biology teaching</p><p>laboratories. CBELife Sciences Education, 10(3), 287-297.</p><p>doi:10.1187/cbe.11-04-0035</p><p></p><p>Siti Ramdiah, & Corebima, A. D. (2014). Learning strategy equalizing students</p><p>achievement, metacognitive and critical thinking skills. American Journal of</p><p>Educational Research, 2(8), 577-584. doi:10.12691/education-2-8-3</p><p></p><p>Siti Seri Kartini, M. Y., Salmiza, S., Hutkemri, & Yew, W. T. (2021). Development</p><p>and usability of B-Geo module in differentiation topic using ASSURE model</p><p>of instructional design. Journal of Educational Research and Indigenous</p><p>Studies, 3(1), 94-117.</p><p></p><p>Siti Shahida, M. A., & Che Nidzam, C. A. (2014). Penggunaan modul pembelajaran</p><p>dan pengajaran berasaskan analogi terhadap pencapaian pelajar bagi topik</p><p>Enzim dalam biologi tingkatan 4. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematik</p><p>Malaysia, 4(2), 91-103.</p><p></p><p>Slavin, R. E. (2015). Cooperative learning in elementary schools. Education, 43(1),</p><p>5-14. doi:10.1080/03004279.2015.963370</p><p></p><p>Slavin, R. E. (1980). Cooperative learning. Review of Educational Research, 50(2),</p><p>315-342. doi:10.3102/00346543050002315</p><p></p><p>Slavin, R. E. (2008). Cooperative learning, success for all, and evidence-based reform</p><p>in education. ducation et didactique, 2(2), 149-157.</p><p>doi:10.4000/educationdidactique.334</p><p></p><p>Smith, M. K., & Knight, J. K. (2012). Using the genetics concept assessment to</p><p>document persistent conceptual difficulties in undergraduate genetics courses.</p><p>Genetics, 191(1), 21-32. doi:10.1534/genetics.111.137810</p><p></p><p>Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. S. (1999). Effects of small-group learning</p><p>on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A</p><p>meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 21-51.</p><p>doi:10.3102/00346543069001021</p><p></p><p>Sri Wardani, Sri Nurhayati, & Aulia Safitri. (2016). The effectiveness of the guided</p><p>inquiry learning module towards students. International Journal of Science</p><p>and Research (IJSR), 5(6), 1589-1594. doi:10.21275/v5i6.nov164512</p><p></p><p>Stefanski, K. M., Gardner, G. E., & Seipelt-Thiemann, R. L. (2016). Development of</p><p>aLacOperon concept inventory (LOCI). CBELife Sciences Education, 15(2),</p><p>1-11. doi:10.1187/cbe.15-07-0162</p><p></p><p>Stern, F., & Kampourakis, K. (2017). Teaching for genetics literacy in the</p><p>post-genomic era. Studies in Science Education, 53(2), 193-225.</p><p>doi:10.1080/03057267.2017.1392731</p><p></p><p>Stoet, G., & Geary, D. C. (2020). Sex-specific academic ability and attitude patterns</p><p>in students across developed countries. Intelligence, 81, 1-10.</p><p>doi:10.1016/j.intell.2020.101453</p><p></p><p>Strand, S., & Boes, K. E. (2019). Drawing a link between genetic inheritance and</p><p>meiosis: A set of exercises for the undergraduate biology classroom. Journal</p><p>of Microbiology & Biology Education, 20(2), 1-8.</p><p>doi:10.1128/jmbe.v20i2.1733</p><p></p><p>Strike, K. A., & Posner, G. J. (1992). A revisionist theory of conceptual change. In</p><p>R. A. Duschl & R. J. Hamilton (Eds.), Philosophy of science, cognitive</p><p>psychology, and educational theory and practice (p. 147176). Albany, NY:</p><p>SUNY Press.</p><p></p><p>Suherman, D. P., Purwianingsih, W., & Diana, S. (2018). Analisis hubungan</p><p>self-efficacy dan metakognitif terhadap hasil belajar siswa sma berdasarkan</p><p>gender pada konsep genetika. Assimilation: Indonesian Journal of Biology</p><p>Education, 1(1), 14-20. doi:10.17509/aijbe.v1i1.11450</p><p></p><p>Sulfemi, W. B. (2018). Hubungan motivasi belajar dengan hasil belajar IPS di SMP</p><p>Kabupaten Bogor. Jurnal Ilmiah Edutecno, 18(1), 1-12.</p><p>doi:10.31227/osf.io/u8nvd</p><p></p><p>Suratsih, Henuhili, V., Rahayu, T., & Hidayat, M. L. (2009). Pengembangan modul</p><p>pembelajaran genetika berbasis fenomena lokal. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 28(2),</p><p>165-176.</p><p></p><p>Surendran, S., & Norazlinda, S. (2019). Pembelajaran mod teradun berasaskan modul</p><p>interactive lecture dalam kalangan pelajar. Jurnal Pembangunan Sosial, 22,</p><p>1-9. doi:10.32890/jps.22.2019.12672</p><p></p><p>Susanti, D., Fitriani, V., & Sari, L. Y. (2020). Validity of module based on project</p><p>based learning in media biology subject. Journal of Physics: Conference</p><p>Series, 1521, 042012. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1521/4/042012</p><p></p><p>Suwono, Hadi; Prasetyo, Triastono Imam; Lestari, Umie; Lukiati, Betty; Fachrunnisa,</p><p>Rifka; Kusairi, Sentot; Saefi, Muhammad; Fauzi, Ahmad; Atho'Illah,</p><p>Mochammad Fitri, H., Prasetyo, T. I., Lestari, U., Lukiati, B., Fachrunnisa, R.,</p><p></p><p>Saefi, S., & Atho'Illah, M. F. (2021). Cell biology diagnostic test (CBD-Test)</p><p>portrays pre-service teacher misconceptions about biology cell. Journal of</p><p>Biological Education, 55(1), 82-105.</p><p></p><p>Syaharom, A. (1990). Practical guide to educational research (Edisi terjemahan).</p><p>Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.</p><p></p><p>Tan, K. C. (2000). Development and application of a diagnostic instrument to</p><p>evaluate secondary students conceptions of qualitative analysis (Disertasi</p><p>kedoktoran). Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Australia .</p><p></p><p>Tekkaya, C. (2002). Misconceptions as barrier to understanding biology. Journal of</p><p>Faculty of Education, 23, 259-266. diambil daripada</p><p>https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6677/b6a7211f31f5ff9da14bede0b0c00a5004</p><p>15.pdf</p><p></p><p>Thrne, K., & Gericke, N. (2013). Teaching genetics in secondary classrooms: A</p><p>linguistic analysis of teachers talk about proteins. Research in Science</p><p>Education, 44(1), 81-108. doi:10.1007/s11165-013-9375-9</p><p></p><p>Todd, A., & Kenyon, L. (2015). Empirical refinements of a molecular genetics</p><p>learning progression: The molecular constructs. Journal of Research in</p><p>Science Teaching, 53(9), 1385-1418. doi:10.1002/tea.21262</p><p></p><p>Todd, A., & Romine, W. (2018). The learning loss effect in genetics: What ideas do</p><p>students retain or lose after instruction? CBELife Sciences Education, 17(4),</p><p>ar55. doi:10.1187/cbe.16-10-0310</p><p></p><p>Topcu, M. S., & Sahin-pekmez, E. (2009). Turkish middle school students</p><p>difficulties in learning genetics concepts. Journal of Turkish Science</p><p>Education, 6(2), 55-62. diambil daripada</p><p>https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2995/148cad2ebac1b7a8a09c39bbfa3bc789c7</p><p>9e.pdf</p><p></p><p>Tran, U. S., Hofer, A. A., & Voracek, M. (2014). Sex differences in general</p><p>knowledge: Meta-analysis and new data on the contribution of school-related</p><p>moderators among high-school students. Plos One, 9(10), e110391.</p><p>doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0110391</p><p></p><p>Treagust, D. F. (1988). Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students</p><p>misconceptions in science. International Journal of Science Education, 10(2),</p><p>159-169. doi:10.1080/0950069880100204</p><p></p><p>Trianto. (2009). Mendesain model pembelajaran inovatif progresif. Surabaya,</p><p>Indonesia: Kencana.</p><p></p><p>Tsui, C., & Treagust, D. F. (2007). Understanding genetics: Analysis of secondary</p><p>students' conceptual status. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(2),</p><p>205-235. doi:10.1002/tea.20116</p><p></p><p>Tsui, C., & Treagust, D. (2010). Evaluating secondary students scientific reasoning</p><p>in genetics using a twotier diagnostic instrument. International Journal of</p><p>Science Education, 32(8), 1073-1098. doi:10.1080/09500690902951429</p><p></p><p>Tuckman, B. W., & Waheed, M. A. (1981). Evaluating an individualized science</p><p>program for community college students. Journal of Research in Science</p><p>Teaching, 18(6), 489-495. doi:10.1002/tea.3660180603</p><p></p><p>Utomo, F. W., & Sugihartati, R. (2018). Diversitas persepsi masyarakat terhadap</p><p>pendidikan. SOCIA: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 15(2), 197-203.</p><p>doi:10.21831/socia.v15i2.22678</p><p></p><p>Valette, R. M. (1977). Modern language testing: A hand book (2nd ed.). New York:</p><p>Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.</p><p></p><p>Vlckova, J., Kubiatko, M., & Usak, M. (2016). Czech high school students'</p><p>misconceptions about basic genetic concepts : Preliminary results. Journal of</p><p>Baltic Science Education, 15(6), 738-745. diambil daripada</p><p>https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312164010</p><p></p><p>Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society : The development of higher psychological</p><p>processes. M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.).</p><p>London, England: Harvard University Press.</p><p></p><p>Wan Norafifah, W. M. (2018). Pelaksanaan Flipped Classroom dalam pembelajaran</p><p>dan pemudahcaraan (pdpc) ke arah meningkatkan pencapaian dan motivasi</p><p>pelajar matrikulasi (Unpublished master's thesis). Universiti Pendidikan</p><p>Sultan Idris.</p><p></p><p>Webb, N. M., & Palincsar., A. S. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. In D. C.</p><p>Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology.</p><p>Macmillan Library Reference USA: Prentice Hall International.</p><p></p><p>Weldon, L. C. (2014). Measuring difference in knowledge achievement and</p><p>satisfaction between viewing interactive and linear online learning modules</p><p>(Tesis sarjana). diambil daripada https://doi.org/10.31274/etd-180810-1416</p><p></p><p>Williams, M., Montgomery, B. L., & Manokore, V. (2012). From phenotype to</p><p>genotype: Exploring middle school students' understanding of genetic</p><p>inheritance in a web-based environment. The American Biology Teacher,</p><p>74(1), 35-40. doi:10.1525/abt.2012.74.1.8</p><p></p><p>Wolyniak, M. J. (2013). Improved student linkage of Mendelian and molecular</p><p>genetic concepts through a yeast-based laboratory module. Biochemistry and</p><p>Molecular Biology Education, 41(3), 163-172. doi:10.1002/bmb.20679</p><p></p><p>Wright, L. K., & Newman, D. L. (2011). An interactive modeling lesson increases</p><p>students' understanding of ploidy during meiosis. Biochemistry and Molecular</p><p>Biology Education, 39(5), 344-351. doi:10.1002/bmb.20523</p><p></p><p>Yang, X., Hartman, M. R., Harrington, K. T., Etson, C. M., Fierman, M. B., Slonim,</p><p>D. K., & Walt, D. R. (2017). Using next-generation sequencing to explore</p><p>genetics and race in the high school classroom. CBELife Sciences Education,</p><p>16(2), ar22. doi:10.1187/cbe.16-09-0281</p><p></p><p>Yip, D. (1998). Identification of misconceptions in novice biology teachers and</p><p>remedial strategies for improving biology learning. International Journal of</p><p>Science Education, 20(4), 461-477. doi:10.1080/0950069980200406</p><p></p><p>Zalizan M. Jelas, M. J., Amla Salleh, S., Izwan Mahmud, M., Norzaini Azman, A.,</p><p>Hanizah Hamzah, H., Zaleha Abd. Hamid, A. H., & Rohana Jani, J. (2014).</p><p>Gender disparity in school participation and achievement: The case in</p><p>Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 140 ( 2014 ) 62 68,</p><p>140, 62-68. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.387</p><p></p>