Modul Basic Concepts in Genetics: intervensi tahap penguasaan dan kerangka alternatif konsep asas genetik pelajar Biologi tingkatan empat
<p>Kajian ini bertujuan membangun dan mengkaji kesan Modul Basic Concepts in</p><p>Genetics (BCG) terhadap penguasaan dan kerangka alternatif konsep asas genetik</p><p>pelajar Biologi. Konsep asas genetik yang dikaji ialah gen (KG...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | thesis |
Language: | zsm |
Published: |
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=8756 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:8756 |
---|---|
record_format |
uketd_dc |
institution |
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
collection |
UPSI Digital Repository |
language |
zsm |
topic |
LB Theory and practice of education |
spellingShingle |
LB Theory and practice of education Sahabuddin Basri Modul Basic Concepts in Genetics: intervensi tahap penguasaan dan kerangka alternatif konsep asas genetik pelajar Biologi tingkatan empat |
description |
<p>Kajian ini bertujuan membangun dan mengkaji kesan Modul Basic Concepts in</p><p>Genetics (BCG) terhadap penguasaan dan kerangka alternatif konsep asas genetik</p><p>pelajar Biologi. Konsep asas genetik yang dikaji ialah gen (KG), kromosom (KK),</p><p>hubungan gen, kromosom dan DNA (HGK) serta hubungan pembahagian sel dan</p><p>pewarisan (HPP). Kajian ini menggunakan pendekatan reka bentuk kajian</p><p>pembangunan berpandukan Model Sidek dan Jamaludin. Reka bentuk kuasi</p><p>eksperimen digunakan bagi menentukan keberkesanan modul. Seramai 64 pelajar</p><p>tingkatan empat dari dua buah sekolah di daerah Tawau dipilih melalui persampelan</p><p>rawak berstrata yang terdiri daripada 34 pelajar kumpulan eksperimen dan 30 pelajar</p><p>kumpulan kawalan. Instrumen kajian ialah Soal Selidik Persepsi Terhadap Modul dan</p><p>Ujian Pencapaian Konsep Asas Genetik. Data dianalisis secara deskriptif dan</p><p>inferensi. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan Modul BCG mempunyai kesahan yang baik</p><p>dengan indeks kesahan 0.94. Hasil analisis terhadap persepsi pelajar menunjukkan</p><p>nilai yang tinggi terhadap kualiti kandungan modul [Min=4.27], keberkesanan</p><p>[Min=4.36] dan kepuasan [Min=4.40]. Ujian-t menunjukkan perbezaan yang</p><p>signifikan terhadap skor antara kumpulan kawalan dan eksperimen bagi konsep KG</p><p>[F=0.002, p=0.968], KK [F=8.59, p=0.005], dan HGK [F=3.95, p=0.051] manakala</p><p>tiada perbezaan yang signifikan terhadap konsep HPP [F=6.10 p=0.016]. Ujian-t juga</p><p>menunjukkan perbezaan yang signifikan antara pelajar lelaki dan perempuan terhadap</p><p>konsep KK [F=8.29, p=0.005] namun tiada perbezaan yang signifikan antara jantina</p><p>pelajar terhadap skor ujian KG, HGK dan HPP. Ujian-U Mann-Whitney pula</p><p>menunjukkan terdapat perbezaan skor yang signifikan antara pelajar lelaki kumpulan</p><p>kawalan dan eksperimen terhadap konsep HGK [U=19.5, z=-2.73, p=0.006] tetapi</p><p>tiada perbezaan signifikan antara jantina bagi kedua-dua kumpulan terhadap konsep</p><p>KG, KK, dan HPP. Oleh itu, kerangka alternatif yang disingkirkan adalah masingmasing</p><p>tujuh dan empat daripada kumpulan eksperimen dan kumpulan kawalan.</p><p>Kesimpulannya, intervensi menggunakan Modul BCG dalam pengajaran terbukti</p><p>dapat mengurangkan kerangka alternatif. Implikasi hasil kajian ialah Modul BCG ini</p><p>sesuai penggunaannya bagi meningkatkan penguasaan konsep asas genetik pelajar</p><p>Biologi.</p> |
format |
thesis |
qualification_name |
|
qualification_level |
Master's degree |
author |
Sahabuddin Basri |
author_facet |
Sahabuddin Basri |
author_sort |
Sahabuddin Basri |
title |
Modul Basic Concepts in Genetics: intervensi tahap penguasaan dan kerangka alternatif konsep asas genetik pelajar Biologi tingkatan empat |
title_short |
Modul Basic Concepts in Genetics: intervensi tahap penguasaan dan kerangka alternatif konsep asas genetik pelajar Biologi tingkatan empat |
title_full |
Modul Basic Concepts in Genetics: intervensi tahap penguasaan dan kerangka alternatif konsep asas genetik pelajar Biologi tingkatan empat |
title_fullStr |
Modul Basic Concepts in Genetics: intervensi tahap penguasaan dan kerangka alternatif konsep asas genetik pelajar Biologi tingkatan empat |
title_full_unstemmed |
Modul Basic Concepts in Genetics: intervensi tahap penguasaan dan kerangka alternatif konsep asas genetik pelajar Biologi tingkatan empat |
title_sort |
modul basic concepts in genetics: intervensi tahap penguasaan dan kerangka alternatif konsep asas genetik pelajar biologi tingkatan empat |
granting_institution |
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
granting_department |
Fakulti Sains dan Matematik |
publishDate |
2022 |
url |
https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=8756 |
_version_ |
1776104564245659648 |
spelling |
oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:87562023-03-08 Modul Basic Concepts in Genetics: intervensi tahap penguasaan dan kerangka alternatif konsep asas genetik pelajar Biologi tingkatan empat 2022 Sahabuddin Basri LB Theory and practice of education <p>Kajian ini bertujuan membangun dan mengkaji kesan Modul Basic Concepts in</p><p>Genetics (BCG) terhadap penguasaan dan kerangka alternatif konsep asas genetik</p><p>pelajar Biologi. Konsep asas genetik yang dikaji ialah gen (KG), kromosom (KK),</p><p>hubungan gen, kromosom dan DNA (HGK) serta hubungan pembahagian sel dan</p><p>pewarisan (HPP). Kajian ini menggunakan pendekatan reka bentuk kajian</p><p>pembangunan berpandukan Model Sidek dan Jamaludin. Reka bentuk kuasi</p><p>eksperimen digunakan bagi menentukan keberkesanan modul. Seramai 64 pelajar</p><p>tingkatan empat dari dua buah sekolah di daerah Tawau dipilih melalui persampelan</p><p>rawak berstrata yang terdiri daripada 34 pelajar kumpulan eksperimen dan 30 pelajar</p><p>kumpulan kawalan. Instrumen kajian ialah Soal Selidik Persepsi Terhadap Modul dan</p><p>Ujian Pencapaian Konsep Asas Genetik. Data dianalisis secara deskriptif dan</p><p>inferensi. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan Modul BCG mempunyai kesahan yang baik</p><p>dengan indeks kesahan 0.94. Hasil analisis terhadap persepsi pelajar menunjukkan</p><p>nilai yang tinggi terhadap kualiti kandungan modul [Min=4.27], keberkesanan</p><p>[Min=4.36] dan kepuasan [Min=4.40]. Ujian-t menunjukkan perbezaan yang</p><p>signifikan terhadap skor antara kumpulan kawalan dan eksperimen bagi konsep KG</p><p>[F=0.002, p=0.968], KK [F=8.59, p=0.005], dan HGK [F=3.95, p=0.051] manakala</p><p>tiada perbezaan yang signifikan terhadap konsep HPP [F=6.10 p=0.016]. Ujian-t juga</p><p>menunjukkan perbezaan yang signifikan antara pelajar lelaki dan perempuan terhadap</p><p>konsep KK [F=8.29, p=0.005] namun tiada perbezaan yang signifikan antara jantina</p><p>pelajar terhadap skor ujian KG, HGK dan HPP. Ujian-U Mann-Whitney pula</p><p>menunjukkan terdapat perbezaan skor yang signifikan antara pelajar lelaki kumpulan</p><p>kawalan dan eksperimen terhadap konsep HGK [U=19.5, z=-2.73, p=0.006] tetapi</p><p>tiada perbezaan signifikan antara jantina bagi kedua-dua kumpulan terhadap konsep</p><p>KG, KK, dan HPP. Oleh itu, kerangka alternatif yang disingkirkan adalah masingmasing</p><p>tujuh dan empat daripada kumpulan eksperimen dan kumpulan kawalan.</p><p>Kesimpulannya, intervensi menggunakan Modul BCG dalam pengajaran terbukti</p><p>dapat mengurangkan kerangka alternatif. Implikasi hasil kajian ialah Modul BCG ini</p><p>sesuai penggunaannya bagi meningkatkan penguasaan konsep asas genetik pelajar</p><p>Biologi.</p> 2022 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=8756 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=8756 text zsm closedAccess Masters Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Sains dan Matematik <p>Abdu Raheem, B. O. (2012). The influence of gender on secondary school students</p><p>academic performance in South-West, Nigeria. Journal of Social Sciences,</p><p>31(1), 93-98. diambil daripada</p><p>https://doi.org/10.1080/09718923.2012.11893018</p><p></p><p>Abdulatip, Suratsih, Henuhili Rahayu, Henuhili, V., & Rahayu, T. (2015).</p><p>Penyusunan bahan ajar genetika dalam bentuk modul pembelajaran berbasis</p><p>fenomena lokal. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Sains, 3(1), 59-64.</p><p></p><p>Abu Bakar, N. (1995). Penilaian afektif. Kajang, Malaysia: Masa Enterprise.</p><p></p><p>Ada, E. E. (2019). The effect of gender, self concept, socioeconomic status ofparents</p><p>and type of school on students general academic achievement & students</p><p>achievement in Biology:A case study of senior secondary school students in</p><p>the Calabar Municipality, Nigeria. International Journal of Trend in Scientific</p><p>Research and Development, 3(2), 194-201. doi:10.31142/ijtsrd20278</p><p></p><p>Ahmann, J. S., & Glock, M. D. (1981). Evaluating students progress: Principles of</p><p>test and measurement. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, Inc.</p><p>Ahmed, M. A., Opatola, Y. M., Yahaya, L., & Sulaiman, M. M. (2018). Identification</p><p>of alternative conceptions of genetics held by senior school students in Ilorin,</p><p>Nigeria, using a three-tier diagnostic test. KIU Journal of Social Sciences, 4(1),</p><p>97-104.</p><p></p><p>Akmalia, R. M., & Sri Nurhayati, P. (2013). Pengembangan modul ipa terpadu</p><p>berkarakter tema pemanasan global untuk siswa smp/mts. Unnes Science</p><p>Education Journal, 2(1), 203-208. doi:10.15294/USEJ.V2I1.1824</p><p></p><p>Akyurek, E., & Afacan, . (2012). Determining the 8th grade students</p><p>misconceptions in the unit of Cell Division by using Roundhouse</p><p>diagramming. Uluslararas Eitim Programlar ve retim almalar</p><p>Dergisi, 2(3), 47-58. diambil daripada</p><p>http://www.ijocis.com/index.php/ijocis/article/view/70/55</p><p></p><p>Alonemarera, A. (2020). Identifikasi miskonsepsi mahasiswa pendidikan biologi pada</p><p>materi genetika menggunakan certainty of response indeks (Cri). Jurnal Biotek,</p><p>8(2), 109-122. doi:10.24252/jb.v8i2.16320</p><p></p><p>Altunolu, B. D., & eker, M. (2015). The understandings of genetics concepts and</p><p>learning approach of pre-service science teachers. Journal of Educational and</p><p>Social Research, 5(1), 61-66. doi:10.5901/jesr.2015.v5n1s1p61</p><p></p><p>Amalia, M., & Sidek, M. N. (2013). An application of the Sidek module development</p><p>in REBT counseling intervention module design for orphans. Procedia -</p><p>Social and Behavioral Sciences, 84(2013), 1481-1491.</p><p>doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.777</p><p></p><p>Amar, G. I., Suranto, S., & Sajidan, S. (2020). The use of a creative problem solving</p><p>based genetic mutation module in higher education. International Journal of</p><p>Higher Education, 10(3), 33-45. doi:10.5430/ijhe.v10n3p33</p><p></p><p>Amir Hoseyn, M. D. (2012). Kagan cooperative learning model: The bridge to foreign</p><p>language learning in the third millennium. Theory and Practice in Language</p><p>Studies, 2(6), 1134-1140. doi:10.4304/tpls.2.6.1134-1140</p><p></p><p>Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological testing (7th ed.). New Jersey:</p><p>Prentice Hall.</p><p></p><p>Ang, C. T., & Lee, L. W. (2016). Instrumen penilaian kualiti untuk modul pengajaran :</p><p>Pengujian ciri psikometrik. Jurnal Kurikulum dan Pengajaran Asia Pasifik,</p><p>4(4), 25-43. diambil daripada https://juku.um.edu.my/article/view/8209/5680</p><p></p><p>Anggraini, A., & Sukardi, S. (2015). Pengembangan modul prakarya dan</p><p>kewirausahaan materi pengolahan berbasis product-oriented bagi peserta didik</p><p>smk. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 5(3), 287. doi:10.21831/jpv.v5i3.6484</p><p></p><p>Ardiansyah, R., Corebima, A. D., & Rohman, F. (2017). Pengembangan bahan ajar</p><p>mutasi genetik pada matakuliah genetika. Jurnal Pendidikan : Teori,</p><p>Penelitian dan Pengembangan, 2(7), 927-933.</p><p></p><p>Ari, D., & Sadi, O. (2019). Effectiveness of cooperative learning on students'</p><p>achievement in genetics, self-efficacy, and conceptions of learning Biology.</p><p>Inquiry in Education, 11(2), 1-20.</p><p></p><p>Arman, I. M. (2020). Effectiveness of blending the Posner and Stepans models of</p><p>conceptual change in correcting misconceptions in 9th grade students.</p><p>International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 7(4), 10-17.</p><p>doi:10.14445/23942703/ijhss-v7i4p102</p><p></p><p>Aronson, E., Stephan, C., Sikes, J., Blaney, N., & Snapp, M. (1978). The Jigsaw</p><p>classroom. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publication.</p><p></p><p>Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Rozavieh, A. (1972). Introduction to research in education.</p><p>New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.</p><p></p><p>Astuti, L. S. (2017). Penguasaan konsep IPA ditinjau dari konsep diri dan minat</p><p>belajar siswa. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 7(1), 40-45.</p><p>doi:10.30998/formatif.v7i1.1293</p><p></p><p>Atilboz, N. G. (2004). Understanding levels and concept misconceptions of high</p><p>school 1 year students on mitosis and Parsley division topics. Gazi Eitim</p><p>Fakltesi Dergisi, 24(3), 147-157.</p><p></p><p>Aydin, G., & Balim, A. G. (2013). Students misconceptions related to subjects of cell</p><p>division and heredity. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 2,</p><p>338-348.</p><p></p><p>Bahar, M. (2003). Misconceptions in biology education and conceptual change</p><p>strategies. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 3(1), 55-64.</p><p></p><p>Bailey, J. (2004). The validation of a scale to measure school principals' attitudes</p><p>toward the inclusion of students with disabilities in regular schools. Australian</p><p>Psychologist, 39(1), 76-87. doi:10.1080/00050060410001660371</p><p></p><p>Barroso, C., Carrion, G. C., Roldan, J. L., & Wang, H. (2010). Applying maximum</p><p>likehood and PLS on different sample sizes: Studies on SERVQUAL model</p><p>and employee behavior model. In V. E. Vinzi, W. W. Chin, & J.</p><p>Henseler (Eds.), Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and</p><p>applications (pp. 427-448). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.</p><p></p><p>Basri, S. (2007). Miskonsepsi berkaitan konsep asas genetik dalam kalangan bakal</p><p>guru Pendidikan Sains (Biologi) (Tesis tidak diterbitkan). Universiti</p><p>Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjong Malim, Perak.</p><p></p><p>Battistich, V., Solomon, D., & Delucchi, K. (1993). Interaction processes and student</p><p>outcomes in cooperative learning groups. The Elementary School Journal,</p><p>94(1), 19-32. doi:10.1086/461748</p><p></p><p>Batzli, J. M., Smith, A. R., Williams, P. H., McGee, S. A., Dsa, K., & Pfammatter, J.</p><p>(2014). Beyond Punnett squares: Student word association and explanations of</p><p>phenotypic variation through an integrative quantitative genetics unit</p><p>investigating anthocyanin inheritance and expression in Brassica rapa fast</p><p>plants. CBELife Sciences Education, 13(3), 410-424.</p><p>doi:10.1187/cbe.13-12-0232</p><p></p><p>Bhattacharjee, J. (2015). Constructivist approach to learningAn effective approach of</p><p>teaching learning. International Research Journal of Interdisciplinary &</p><p>Multidisciplinary Studies (IRJIMS), 1(6), 65-74. diambil daripada</p><p>http://oaji.net/articles/2015/1707-1438677336.pdf</p><p></p><p>Black, J. A., & Champion, D. J. (1976). Methods and issues in social research. New</p><p>York: Wiley.</p><p></p><p>Bloom, B. S. (1977). Favorable learning conditions for all. Teacher, 95(3), 22-28.</p><p></p><p>Borg, W. R., Gall, J. P., & Gall, M. D. (1993). Applying educational research: A</p><p>practical guide (3rd ed.). New York: Longman.</p><p></p><p>Bozda, H. C., & Ok, G. (2019). Determination of the knowledge awareness and</p><p>misconceptions of sixth grade students about the cell with four tier test.</p><p>Adyaman niversitesi Eitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(1), 200-226.</p><p>doi:10.17984/adyuebd.413369</p><p></p><p>Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. New York, NY:</p><p>Springer.</p><p></p><p>Broadwell, M. M. (1969). Teaching for learning. The Gospel Guardian, 20(41), 1-3.</p><p>diambil daripada</p><p>http://www.wordsfitlyspoken.org/gospel_guardian/v20/v20n41p3_image.html</p><p></p><p>Buerah, T., Shanah, N., & Hamimah, A. N. (2015). Delinkuen pelajar dan cadangan</p><p>penyelesaiannya menerusi model pembangungan sahsiah remaja/pelajar</p><p>muslim bersepadu. Jurnal Hadhari, 7(2), 11-30.</p><p></p><p>CastroFaix, M., Duncan, R. G., & Choi, J. (2020). Datadriven refinements of a</p><p>genetics learning progression. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(1),</p><p>3-39. doi:10.1002/tea.21631</p><p></p><p>Celikler, D., & Aksan, Z. (2014). Determination of knowledge and misconceptions of</p><p>pre-service elementary science teachers about the greenhouse effect by</p><p>drawing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 136, 452-456.</p><p>doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.355</p><p></p><p>Chan, S., & Pollard, D. E. (2001). An encyclopaedia of translation: Chinese - English,</p><p>English - Chinese. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.</p><p></p><p>Chapman, A., & Georgiou, M. (2021). Powerful knowledge building and conceptual</p><p>change research: Learning from research on 'historical accounts' in England</p><p>and Cyprus. In A. Chapman (Ed.), Knowing history in schools (pp. 72-96).</p><p>London: UCL Press.</p><p></p><p>Chattopadhyay, A. (2005). Understanding of genetic information in higher secondary</p><p>students in Northeast India and the implications for genetics education. Cell</p><p>Biology Education, 4(1), 97-104. doi:10.1187/cbe.04-06-0042</p><p></p><p>Chattopadhyay, A. (2012). Understanding of mitosis and meiosis in higher secondary</p><p>students of Northeast India and the implications for genetics education.</p><p>Education, 2(3), 41-47. doi:10.5923/j.edu.20120203.04</p><p></p><p>Chen, Y. T., & Wang, J. H. (2016). Analyzing with Posners conceptual change</p><p>model and Toulmins model of argumentative demonstration in senior high</p><p>school students mathematic learning. International Journal of Information</p><p>and Education Technology, 6(6), 457-464. doi:10.7763/ijiet.2016.v6.732</p><p></p><p>Chi, M. T. (2005). Commonsense conceptions of emergent processes: Why some</p><p>misconceptions are robust. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 161-199.</p><p>doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1402_1</p><p></p><p>Chi, M. T., & Roscoe, R. D. (2002). The process and challenges of conceptual change.</p><p>In M. Limn & L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in</p><p>theory and practice. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.</p><p></p><p>Cimer, S. O. (2017). What makes a change unsuccessful through the eyes of teachers.</p><p>International Education Studies, 11(1), 81. doi:10.5539/ies.v11n1p81</p><p></p><p>Clapper, T. C. (2015). Cooperative-based learning and the zone of proximal</p><p>development. Simulation & Gaming, 46(2), 148-158.</p><p>doi:10.1177/1046878115569044</p><p></p><p>Clark, D. C., & Mathis, P. M. (2000). Modeling mitosis & meiosis: A</p><p>problem-solving activity. The American Biology Teacher, 62(3), 204-206.</p><p>doi:10.2307/4450874</p><p></p><p>Clement, J. (1982). Students preconceptions in introductory mechanics. American</p><p>Journal of Physics, 50(1), 66-71. doi:10.1119/1.12989</p><p></p><p>Cohen, J. W. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.).</p><p>Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.</p><p></p><p>Cooper, D., & Schindler, P. (2011). Business research methods (11th ed.). Boston:</p><p>McGraw Hill.</p><p></p><p>Cox, J. (2020, May 6). How to use the RoundRobin discussion teaching strategies.</p><p>diambil daripada</p><p>https://www.unige.ch/innovations-pedagogiques/application/files/1115/8877/8</p><p>105/Jorg_Balsiger_SocDur_How_to_Use_the_Round_Robin_Discussion_Tea</p><p>ching_Strategies.pdf</p><p></p><p>Cronbach, L. J. (1990). Essentials of education measurement. New Jersey:Prentice</p><p>Hall.</p><p></p><p>Dabell, J. (2019, January 27). The RoundRobin. Diambil pada 1 Januari, 2021,</p><p>daripada https://johndabell.com/2019/02/16/the-round-robin/</p><p></p><p>Defi Firman, S. (2014). Analisis penguasaan konsep dan miskonsepsi siswa sma pada</p><p>materi genetika (Master's thesis, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung,</p><p>Indonesia). Retrieved from http://repository.upi.edu/12639/</p><p></p><p>Dewi Murni. (2013). Identifikasi miskonsepsi mahasiswa pada konsep substansi</p><p>genetika menggunakan Certainty of Response Index (CRI). Prosiding</p><p>Semirata FMIPA Universitas Lampung, 1(1), 205-2011.</p><p></p><p>Dewi, P. Y., & Primayana, K. H. (2019). Effect of learning module with setting</p><p>contextual teaching and learning to increase the understanding of concepts.</p><p>International Journal of Education and Learning, 1(1), 19-26.</p><p>doi:10.31763/ijele.v1i1.26</p><p></p><p>Dikmenli, M. (2010). Misconceptions of cell division held by student teachers in</p><p>biology: A drawing analysis. Scientific Research and Essay, 5(2), 235-247.</p><p>diambil daripada</p><p>https://academicjournals.org/article/article1380539915_Dikmenli.pdf</p><p></p><p>Dixit, S., Bhardwaj, U. D., & Aniyan, A. T. (2020). A quasi-experimental study to</p><p>evaluate the effectiveness of self-instructional module (SIM) regarding</p><p>non-communicable diseases (NCD) among nursing officers in terms of</p><p>knowledge. International Journal of Nursing & Midwifery Research, 6(4),</p><p>8-12. doi:10.24321/2455.9318.201926</p><p></p><p>Dorji, J., Tamang, S., Tshewang, T., Dorji, T., & Dorji, T. Y. (2018). Genetic</p><p>diversity and population structure of three traditional horse breeds of Bhutan</p><p>based on 29 DNA microsatellite markers. Plos One 13(6), 1-11.</p><p>doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0199376</p><p></p><p>Duda, H. J. (2016). International Conference On Education. Malang, Indonesia:</p><p>Graduate School, Universitas Negeri Malang.</p><p></p><p>Duncan, R. G., & Reiser, B. J. (2007). Reasoning across ontologically distinct levels:</p><p>Students' understandings of molecular genetics. Journal of Research in</p><p>Science Teaching, 44(7), 938-959. doi:10.1002/tea.20186</p><p></p><p>Duncan, R. G., & Tseng, K. A. (2010). Designing project-based instruction to foster</p><p>generative and mechanistic understandings in genetics. Science Education,</p><p>95(1), 21-56. doi:10.1002/sce.20407</p><p></p><p>Duncan, R. G., Castro-Faix, M., & Choi, J. (2014). Informing a learning progression</p><p>in genetics: Which should be taught first, Mendelian inheritance or the central</p><p>dogma of molecular biology? International Journal of Science and</p><p>Mathematics Education, 14(3), 445-472. doi:10.1007/s10763-014-9568-3</p><p></p><p>Duncan, R. G., Choi, J., Castro-Faix, M., & Cavera, V. L. (2017). A study of two</p><p>instructional sequences informed by alternative learning progressions in</p><p>genetics. Science & Education, 26(10), 1115-1141.</p><p>doi:10.1007/s11191-017-9932-0</p><p></p><p>Duncan, R. G., Rogat, A. D., & Yarden, A. (2009). A learning progression for</p><p>deepening students' understandings of modern genetics across the 5th-10th</p><p>grades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 655-674.</p><p>doi:10.1002/tea.20312</p><p></p><p>Dwisetyaningrum, Y., Sarwanto, S., & Aminah, N. S. (2019). Pengembangan modul</p><p>fisika sma berbasis science technology society pada materi elastisitas untuk</p><p>meningkatkan motivasi belajar dan hasil belajar siswa. INKUIRI: Jurnal</p><p>Pendidikan IPA, 8(1), 29-39. doi:10.20961/inkuiri.v8i1.31806</p><p></p><p>Ebel, R. I. (1972). Essentials of educational measurement. New Jersey: Prentice Hall,</p><p>Inc.</p><p></p><p>Edward, G. C., & Richard, A. Z. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment. USA:</p><p>Sage Publication, Inc.</p><p></p><p>Emre, I., & Bahsi, M. (2006). Misconceptions of science teacher candidates about cell</p><p>division. Research of Eastern Anatolia Region, 4(3), 70-73.</p><p></p><p>Eryilmaz, M., & Cigdemoglu, C. (2018). Individual flipped learning and cooperative</p><p>flipped learning: Their effects on students performance, social, and computer</p><p>anxiety. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(4), 432-442.</p><p>doi:10.1080/10494820.2018.1522652</p><p></p><p>Etobro, A. B., & Banjoko, S. (2017). Misconceptions of genetics concepts among</p><p>pre-service teachers. Global Journal of Educational Research, 16(2), 121-128.</p><p>doi:10.4314/gjedr.v16i2.6</p><p></p><p>Etobro, A. B., & Fabinu, O. E. (2017). Students perceptions of difficult concepts in</p><p>biology in senior secondary schools in Lagos state. Global Journal of</p><p>Educational Research, 16(2), 139-147. doi:10.4314/gjedr.v16i2.8</p><p></p><p>Fadlillah, M. (2018). Persepsi mahasiswa PG-PAUD Universitas Muhammadiyah</p><p>Ponorogo terhadap PAUD di Kabupaten Ponorogo,. Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal</p><p>Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 2(1), 117-127.</p><p></p><p>Fairuz, M., Mohammad, S., & Mohd Sollah, M. (2019). Persepsi pelajar terhadap</p><p>Modul Cerita Nahu (MCN). Asia Pasific Online Journal of Arabic Studies,</p><p>3(1), 116. Retrieved from</p><p>http://mjs.um.edu.my/index.php/APOJAS/article/view/21816</p><p></p><p>Fantuzzo, J. W., King, J. A., & Heller, L. R. (1992). Effects of reciprocal peer</p><p>tutoring on mathematics and school adjustment: A component analysis.</p><p>Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 331-339.</p><p>doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.331</p><p></p><p>Fauzi, A., & Mitalistiani, M. (2018). High school biology topics that perceived</p><p>difficult by undergraduate students. Didaktika Biologi: Jurnal Penelitian</p><p>Pendidikan Biologi, 2(2), 73-84. doi:10.32502/dikbio.v2i2.1242</p><p></p><p>Fredricks, J. A., Hofkens, T., Wang, M., Mortenson, E., & Scott, P. (2017).</p><p>Supporting girls and boys engagement in math and science learning: A</p><p>mixed methods study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(2),</p><p>271-298. doi:10.1002/tea.21419</p><p></p><p>Gable, R. K., & Wolf, M. B. (1993). Instrument development in the affective domain:</p><p>Measuring attitudes and values in corporate and school settings (2nd ed.).</p><p>doi:10.1007/978-94-011-1400-4</p><p></p><p>Gallagher, J. M., & Reid, D. K. (2002). The learning theory of Piaget & Inhelder. NE:</p><p>Author Choice Press.</p><p></p><p>Garba, A., Ismail, N., Osman, S., & Rameli, M. R. (2020). Exploring peer effect on</p><p>mathematics anxiety among secondary school students of Sokoto state,</p><p>Nigeria through photovoice approach. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics,</p><p>Science and Technology Education, 16(2), 2-12. doi:10.29333/ejmste/112622</p><p></p><p>Geldsetzer, P., & Fawzi, W. (2017). Quasi-experimental study designs seriespaper</p><p>2: complementary approaches to advancing global health knowledge. Journal</p><p>of Clinical Epidemiology, 89, 12-16. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.03.015</p><p></p><p>Goldschmid, B., & Goldschmid, M. L. (1973). Modular instruction in higher</p><p>education: A review. Higher Education, 2(1), 15-32. doi:10.1007/bf00162534</p><p></p><p>Gonzlez, N., & Rossi, A. (2016). Examining pedagogical knowledge content on</p><p>mitosis in a university context. Multidisciplinary Journal for Education,</p><p>Social and Technological Sciences, 3(2), 79-106. doi:10.4995/muse.2016.4653</p><p></p><p>Grace, E. N. (2017). Facilitating students understanding of biological phenomena</p><p>using conceptual change instructional model in Enugu metropolis, Nigeria.</p><p>Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal, 8(4), 2775-2780.</p><p>doi:10.20533/licej.2040.2589.2017.0366</p><p></p><p>Greager, J., & Murray, D. (1991). The use of modules in college teaching. Nichols</p><p>Publishing Co., Inc.</p><p></p><p>Gurian, M., & Stevens, K. (2004). With boys and girls in mind. Educational</p><p>Leadership, 62(3), 21-26. diambil daripada</p><p>http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/nov04/vol62/num03/</p><p>With-Boys-and-Girls-in-Mind.aspx</p><p></p><p>Guskey, T. R. (2007). Closing achievement gaps: Revisiting Benjamin S. Blooms</p><p>learning for mastery. Journal of Advanced Academics, 19(1), 8-31. diambil</p><p>daripada https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.4219/jaa-2007-704</p><p></p><p>Gusmalini, A., Wulandari, S., & Zulfarina. (2020). Universitas Riau International</p><p>Conference on Science and Environment 2020 (URICSE-2020). Riau,</p><p>Indonesia: IOP Publishing.</p><p></p><p>Hackling, M. W., & Treagust, D. (1984). Research data necessary for meaningful</p><p>review of grade ten high school genetics curricula. Journal of Research in</p><p>Science Teaching, 21(2), 197-209. doi:10.1002/tea.3660210210</p><p></p><p>Hadjichambis, A. C., Georgiou, Y., Paraskeva-Hadjichambi, D., Kyza, E. A., &</p><p>Mappouras, D. (2015). Investigating the effectiveness of an inquiry-based</p><p>intervention on human reproduction in relation to students gender, prior</p><p>knowledge and motivation for learning in biology. Journal of Biological</p><p>Education, 50(3), 261-274. doi:10.1080/00219266.2015.1067241</p><p></p><p>Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer om partial least</p><p>squares structural equation modelling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.</p><p></p><p>Hakim, A., Liliasari, L., Kadarohman, A., & Syah, Y. M. (2016). Effects of the</p><p>natural product mini project laboratory on the students conceptual</p><p>understanding. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 13(2), 27-36. diambil</p><p>daripada https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10165a</p><p></p><p>Hall, J. (2012). Gender issues in mathematics: An Ontario perspective. Journal of</p><p>Teaching and Learning, 8(1). doi:10.22329/jtl.v8i1.3004</p><p></p><p>Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., Carter, S. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2000).</p><p>Short-term and long-term consequences of achievement goals: Predicting</p><p>interest and performance over time. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2),</p><p>316-330. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.2.316</p><p></p><p>Haskel-Ittah, M., & Yarden, A. (2018). Students conception of genetic phenomena</p><p>and its effect on their ability to understand the underlying mechanism.</p><p>CBELife Sciences Education, 17(3), 1-9. doi:10.1187/cbe.18-01-0014</p><p></p><p>Hasnah, M., Zaidatun, T., & Baharuddin, A. (2014, August). Pengaruh gaya kognitif</p><p>terhadap pencapaian pelajar. Kertas dibentangkan pada Konvensyen</p><p>Antarabangsa Jiwa Pendidik 2014, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. diambil</p><p>daripada</p><p>https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270272732_PENGARUH_GAYA_</p><p>KOGNITIF_TERHADAP_PENCAPAIAN_PELAJAR</p><p></p><p>Hassan, M. N., Mustapha, R., Nik Yusuff, N. A., & Mansor, R. (2017). Development</p><p>of higher order thinking skills module in science primary school: Needs</p><p>analysis. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social</p><p>Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society,</p><p>International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences,</p><p>7(2), 624-628.</p><p></p><p>Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (2002). Young children's thinking about biological world</p><p>(1st ed.). New York, NY: Psychology Press.</p><p></p><p>Hayashi, Y., Fukamachi, K. I., & Komatsugawa, H. (2015, April). Collaborative</p><p>learning in computer programming courses that adopted the flipped</p><p>classroom. Kertas dibentangkan pada 2015 International Conference on</p><p>Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering, Taipei. diambil</p><p>daripada https://ieeexplore.ieee.org</p><p></p><p>Helmers, M. J., Youngquist, T. D., & Grudens-Schuck, N. (2019). Novel use if</p><p>conceptual change framework improves video on challenging science topic.</p><p>Journal of Extension, 57(1), 1-4. Retrieved from</p><p>https://www.nrem.iastate.edu/research/STRIPS/files/publication/novel_use_of</p><p>_conceptual_change_framework_improves_video_on_challenging_science_to</p><p>pic.pdf</p><p></p><p>Hemmerich, J. A., Van Voorhis, K., & Wiley, J. (2016). Anomalous evidence,</p><p>confidence change, and theory change. Cognitive Science, 40(6), 1534-1560.</p><p>doi:10.1111/cogs.12289</p><p></p><p>Heri, S., Steven, O., & Mutiara, G. P. (2018). Isu kesetaraan gender dalam optik</p><p>feminist. Jurisprudence, 5(2), 121-140. diambil daripada</p><p>journal.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/Jurisprudent</p><p></p><p>Hobri, Dafik, & Anowar, H. (2018). The implementation of learning together in</p><p>improving students mathematical performance. International Journal of</p><p>Instruction, 11(2), 483-496. doi:10.12973/iji.2018.11233a</p><p></p><p>Hobri. (2010). Metodologi penelitian pengembangan (Aplikasi pada penelitian</p><p>pendidikan matematika). Jember, Indonesia: Pena Salsabila.</p><p></p><p>Jackson, S. L. (2006). Research methods and statistics : A critical thinking approach</p><p>(2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Higher Education.</p><p></p><p>Jibrin, A. G., & Zayum, D. S. (2012). Effect of concept mapping teaching strategy on</p><p>the academic achievement of senior secondary school students in genetics.</p><p>Journal of Science, Technology & Education, 1(1), 49-53. Retrieved from</p><p>https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270592954</p><p></p><p>Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Impact ff cooperative-team learning on</p><p>performance and retention (NOOO1 4-87-K-021 8). diambil daripada</p><p>University of Minnesota website:</p><p>https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235154420_Impact_of_Cooperative-</p><p>Team_Learning_on_Performance_and_Retention_of_Navy_Air-Traffic_Contr</p><p>oller_Trainees</p><p></p><p>Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Holubec, E. J. (1990). Circles of learning :</p><p>Cooperation in the classroom (3rd ed.). Edina, MI: Interaction Book Co.,.</p><p></p><p>Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (2013). Cooperative learning:</p><p>Improving university instruction by basing practice on validated theory.</p><p>Retrieved from</p><p>https://karlsmithmn.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Johnson-Johnson-Smith-</p><p>Cooperative_Learning-JECT-Small_Group_Learning-draft.pdf</p><p></p><p>Johnstone, A. H., & Mahmoud, N. A. (1980). Isolating topics of high perceived</p><p>difficulty school biology. Journal of Biological Education, 14(2), 163-166.</p><p>doi:10.1080/00219266.1980.10668983</p><p></p><p>Juhairiah, J., Danaryanti, A., & Sukmawati, R. A. (2018). Pengembangan buku siswa</p><p>dengan pendekatan kontekstual pada materi persamaan linear satu variabel</p><p>untuk siswa sekolah menengah pertama. Edu-Mat: Jurnal Pendidikan</p><p>Matematika, 6(1). doi:10.20527/edumat.v6i1.5129</p><p></p><p>Juwantara, R. A. (2019). Analisis teori perkembangan kognitif Piaget pada tahap anak</p><p>usia operasional konkret 7-12 tahun dalam pembelajaran matematika.</p><p>Al-Adzka: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 9(1), 27.</p><p>doi:10.18592/aladzkapgmi.v9i1.3011</p><p></p><p>Kagan, S. (2003). A brief history of Kagan structures. diambil daripada</p><p>https://www.kaganonline.com/free_articles/dr_spencer_kagan/256/A-Brief-Hi</p><p>story-of-Kagan-Structures</p><p></p><p>Kalaian, S., Kasim, R., & Nims, J. (2018). Effectiveness of small-group learning</p><p>pedagogies in engineering and technology education: A meta-analysis.</p><p>Journal of Technology Education, 29(2), 20-35. doi:10.21061/jte.v29i2.a.2</p><p></p><p>Karsono, A. D. (1993). Konsep dan sistem pendidikan jarak jauh. Kuala Lumpur,</p><p>Malaysia: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.</p><p></p><p>Kerlinger, E. N. (1986). Foundations of behavioral research. New York: Holt,</p><p>Rinehart and Wiston.</p><p></p><p>Khaerunnisa, E. (2016). Studi deskriptif adversity quotient matematis. Jurnal</p><p>Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 9(1), 83-92.</p><p></p><p>Khaerunnisa. (2020). Peningkatan keterampilan menulis karya ilmiah melalui</p><p>pendekatan kolaboratif. Stilistika: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra,</p><p>13(1), 61-66. doi:10.30651/st.v13i1.3762</p><p></p><p>Kiboss, J. K., Ndirangu, M., & Wekesa, E. W. (2004). Effectiveness of a</p><p>computer-mediated simulations program in school biology on pupils' learning</p><p>outcomes in cell theory. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(2),</p><p>207-213. doi:10.1023/b:jost.0000031259.76872.f1</p><p></p><p>Kil, D., Taber, K. S., & Winterbottom, M. (2016). A cross-national study of</p><p>students understanding of genetics concepts: Implications from similarities</p><p>and differences in England and Turkey. Education Research International,</p><p>2016, 1-14. doi:10.1155/2016/6539626</p><p></p><p>Kim, D., & Downey, S. (2016). Examining the use of the ASSURE model by K12</p><p>teachers. Computers in the Schools, 33(3), 153-168.</p><p>doi:10.1080/07380569.2016.1203208</p><p></p><p>King, C. J. (2009). An analysis of misconceptions in science textbooks: Earth science</p><p>in England and Wales. International Journal of Science Education, 32(5),</p><p>565-601. doi:10.1080/09500690902721681</p><p></p><p>Kirk, J., & Miller, M. L. (1986). Reliability and validity in qualitative research.</p><p>doi:10.4135/9781412985659</p><p></p><p>Kiwanuka, H. N., Van Damme, J., Van Den Noortgate, W., Anumendem, D. N.,</p><p>Vanlaar, G., Reynolds, C., & Namusisi, S. (2016). How do student and</p><p>classroom characteristics affect attitude toward mathematics? A multivariate</p><p>multilevel analysis. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 28(1), 1-21.</p><p>doi:10.1080/09243453.2016.1201123</p><p></p><p>Knippels, M. P., Waarlo, A. J., & Boersma, K. T. (2005). Design criteria for learning</p><p>and teaching genetics. Journal of Biological Education, 39(3), 108-112.</p><p>doi:10.1080/00219266.2005.9655976</p><p></p><p>Kuhn, T. S. (1970). Reflections on my critics. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.),</p><p>Criticism and the growth of knowledge (p. 231278). Cambridge: Cambridge</p><p>University Press.</p><p></p><p>Kumanda, B., Ateskan, A., & Lane, J. (2018). Misconceptions in biology: A</p><p>meta-synthesis study of research, 20002014. Journal of Biological Education,</p><p>53(4), 350-364. doi:10.1080/00219266.2018.1490798</p><p></p><p>Kurt, H., Ekici, G., Aksu, ., & Akta, M. (2013). Determining cognitive structures</p><p>and alternative conceptions on the concept of reproduction (The case of</p><p>pre-service biology teachers). Creative Education, 04(09), 572-587.</p><p>doi:10.4236/ce.2013.49083</p><p></p><p>Laal, M., & Laal, M. (2012). Collaborative learning: What is it? Procedia - Social and</p><p>Behavioral Sciences, 31, 491-495. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.092</p><p></p><p>Laila Puspita. (2019). Pengembangan modul berbasis keterampilan proses sains</p><p>sebagai bahan ajar dalam pembelajaran biologi. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan</p><p>IPA, 5(1), 79-88. doi:10.21831/jipi.v5i1.22530</p><p></p><p>Laimeheriwa, B. M. (2018). The genetic research methods and its role in aquaculture</p><p>on Indonesia. Oceanography & Fisheries Open access Journal, 8(3), 1-23.</p><p>doi:10.19080/ofoaj.2018.08.555738</p><p></p><p>LaningaWijnen, L., Harakeh, Z., Garandeau, C. F., Dijkstra, J. K., Veenstra, R., &</p><p>Vollebergh, W. A. (2019). Classroom popularity hierarchy predicts prosocial</p><p>and aggressive popularity norms across the school year. Child Development,</p><p>90(5), 637-653. doi:10.1111/cdev.13228</p><p></p><p>Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia. (2018). Kupasan mutu jawapan SPM 2017 Biologi 2</p><p>4551/2. diambil daripada Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia website:</p><p>http://lp.moe.gov.my/images/bahan/spm/KMJ/KMJ_SPM_2017/BIOLOGI%2</p><p>02%20(4551_2).pdf</p><p></p><p>Lewis, J., & Kattmann, U. (2004). Traits, genes, particles and information: Revisiting</p><p>students understandings of genetics. International Journal of Science</p><p>Education, 26(2), 195-206. doi:10.1080/0950069032000072782</p><p></p><p>Lewis, J., & Wood-Robinson, C. (2000). Genes, chromosomes, cell division and</p><p>inheritance - do students see any relationship? International Journal of</p><p>Science Education, 22(2), 177-195. doi:10.1080/095006900289949</p><p></p><p>Lewis, J., Leach, J., & Wood-Robinson, C. (2000a). All in the genes? young</p><p>people's understanding of the nature of genes. Journal of Biological Education,</p><p>34(2), 74-79. doi:10.1080/00219266.2000.9655689</p><p></p><p>Lewis, J., Leach, J., & Wood-Robinson, C. (2000c). What's in a cell? young</p><p>people's understanding of the genetic relationship between cells, within an</p><p>individual. Journal of Biological Education, 34(3), 129-132.</p><p>doi:10.1080/00219266.2000.9655702</p><p></p><p>Lindberg, S. M., Hyde, J. S., Petersen, J. L., & Linn, M. C. (2010). New trends in</p><p>gender and mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin,</p><p>136(6), 1123-1135. doi:10.1037/a0021276</p><p></p><p>Linke, R. D., & Venz, M. I. (1979). Misconceptions in physical science among</p><p>non-science background students: II. Research in Science Education, 9(1),</p><p>103-109. doi:10.1007/bf02359149</p><p></p><p>Longden, B. (1982). Geneticsare there inherent learning difficulties? Journal of</p><p>Biological Education, 16(2), 135-140. doi:10.1080/00219266.1982.9654439</p><p></p><p>Luksa, T., Radanovis, I., Garasis, D., & Sertis Peris, M. (2016). Misconceptions of</p><p>primary and high school students related tothe biological concept of human</p><p>reproduction,cell life cycle and molecular basis of heredity. Journal of Turkish</p><p>Science Education, 13(3), 143-160. diambil daripada</p><p>https://bib.irb.hr/datoteka/845394.Luksa_i_sur_2016.pdf</p><p></p><p>Machov, M., & Ehler, E. (2021). Secondary school students misconceptions in</p><p>genetics: Origins and solutions. Journal of Biological Education, 1-14.</p><p>doi:10.1080/00219266.2021.1933136</p><p></p><p>Majzub, R. M., & Rais, M. M. (2010). Boys underachievement: Male versus female</p><p>teachers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7, 685-690.</p><p>doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.10.093</p><p></p><p>Marshall, P. A. (2008). Mapping linked genes in drosophila melanogaster using data</p><p>from the F2 generation of a dihybrid cross. The American Biology Teacher,</p><p>70(9), 554-556. doi:10.2307/27669342</p><p></p><p>Marshall, P. (2006). The power to transform: Leadership that brings learning and</p><p>schooling to life. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.</p><p></p><p>Mbajiorgu, N. M., Ezechi, N. G., & Idoko, E. C. (2007). Addressing nonscientific</p><p>presuppositions in genetics using a conceptual cha</p><p></p><p>McGuirk, P. M., & O'Neill, P. (2016). Using questionnaires in qualitative human</p><p>geography. In I. Hay (Ed.), Qualitative research methods in human geography</p><p>(pp. 246-273). (pp. 246-273). Don Mills, Canada: Oxford University Press.</p><p></p><p>Meade, M. E., Wammes, J. D., & Fernandes, M. A. (2018). Drawing as an encoding</p><p>tool: Memorial benefits in younger and older adults. Experimental Aging</p><p>Research, 44(5), 369-396. doi:10.1080/0361073x.2018.1521432</p><p></p><p>Mensah, F. K., & Kiernan, K. E. (2010). Gender differences in educational attainment:</p><p>Influences of the family environment. British Educational Research Journal,</p><p>36(2), 239-260. doi:10.1080/01411920902802198</p><p></p><p>Mertens, T. R., & Walker, J. O. (1992). A paper-& pencil strategy for teaching</p><p>mitosis & meiosis, diagnosing learning problems & predicting examination</p><p>performance. The American Biology Teacher, 54(8), 470-474.</p><p>doi:10.2307/4449552</p><p></p><p>Midgley, C. (2002). Goals, goal structures, and patterns of adaptive learning. diambil</p><p>daripada</p><p>https://www.questia.com/library/104586992/goals-goal-structures-and-pattern</p><p>s-of-adaptive-learning</p><p></p><p>Mital, S., Musunuru, K., Garg, V., Russell, M. W., Lanfear, D. E., Gupta, R. M., </p><p>Hickey, K. T. (2016). Enhancing literacy in cardiovascular genetics: A</p><p>scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation:</p><p>Cardiovascular Genetics, 9(5), 448-467. doi:10.1161/hcg.0000000000000031</p><p></p><p>Mohd Majid, K. (1998). Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan (4th ed.). Kuala Lumpur:</p><p>Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.</p><p></p><p>Mohd Majid, K. (2005). Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur:Dewan</p><p>Bahasa & Pustaka.</p><p></p><p>Mohd Syaubari, O., & Ahmad Yusuf, K. (2018). Kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan</p><p>instrumen komposisi pengajaran guru pendidikan islam sekolah rendah yang</p><p>mengintegrasikan kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi (KBAT) menerusi pengajaran</p><p>akidah. Sains Humanika, 10(3). doi:10.11113/sh.v10n3.1297</p><p></p><p>Mohd Yusof, K., Wan Alwi, S., Sadikin, A., & Abdul Aziz, A. (2015). Inculcating</p><p>sustainability among first-year engineering students using cooperative</p><p>problem-based learning. Sustainability in Higher Education, 67-95.</p><p>doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-100367-1.00004-4</p><p></p><p>Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., & Kemp, J. E. (2001). Designing effective</p><p>instruction (3rd ed.). Michigan: Wiley.</p><p></p><p>Mosher, B. (2007, November 2). Is your learning about mastery or competency?</p><p>diambil daripada</p><p>https://www.chieflearningofficer.com/2007/11/02/is-your-learning-about-mast</p><p>ery-or-competency/</p><p></p><p>Muela, F. J., & Abril, A. M. (2014). Genetics and cinema: Personal misconceptions</p><p>that constitute obstacles to learning. International Journal of Science</p><p>Education, 4(3), 260-280. doi:10.1080/21548455.2013.817026</p><p></p><p>Muhammad Ridho, F. (2020). Efektivitas layanan bimbingan belajar melalui teknik</p><p>motivational interviewing untuk meningkatkan motivasi belajar peserta didik</p><p>kelas XI di SMAN 9 Bandar Lampung tahun pembelajaran 2019/2020</p><p>(Master's thesis, UIN Raden Intan, Lampung, Indonesia). diambil daripada</p><p>http://repository.radenintan.ac.id/id/eprint/12191</p><p></p><p>Muhammad Sabri, S., Nor Aziah, A., Zawawi, I., & Nurulhuda, O. (2012). Employing</p><p>design and development research (DDR) approaches in design and</p><p>development of online arabic vocabulary learning games prototype. The</p><p>Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(2), 108-119. Retrieved</p><p>from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ989018</p><p></p><p>Muhammad Wahyu, S. (2017). Pengembangan modul pembelajaran biologi berbasis</p><p>pendekatan saintifik untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa. Journal of</p><p>Educational Science and Technology, 3(2), 102-112.</p><p>doi:10.26858/est.v3i2.3468</p><p></p><p>Mulyasa, E. (2006). Kurikulum berbasis kompetensi : Konsep, karakteristik,</p><p>implementasi, dan inovasi. Bandung, Indonesia: Remaja Rosdakarya.</p><p></p><p>Murray, G. T. (1985). The international encyclopedia of education. Oxford, UK:</p><p>Pergamon Press Ltd.</p><p></p><p>Murtafiah, M., & Amin, N. (2018). Pengaruh gaya kognitif dan gender terhadap</p><p>kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika. Jurnal Penelitian dan</p><p>Pembelajaran Matematika, 11(1), 75-82. doi:10.30870/jppm.v11i1.2986</p><p></p><p>Musa, A. K., Dauda, B., & Umar, M. A. (2016). Gender differences in achievement</p><p>goals and performances in English Language and Mathematics of senior</p><p>secondary schools students in Borno State, Nigeria. Journal of Education and</p><p>Practice, 7(27), 165-175. diambil daripada</p><p>https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1115862.pdf</p><p></p><p>Muslimin, M. S., Mohd Nordin, N., Mansor, A. Z., & Md Yunus, M. (2017). The</p><p>design and development of MobiEko: A mobile educational app for</p><p>microeconomics module. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction</p><p>(Special Issue), 221-255. doi:10.32890/mjli.2017.7804</p><p></p><p>Newman, D. L., Catavero, C. M., & Wright, L. K. (2012). Students fail to transfer</p><p>knowledge of chromosome structure to topics pertaining to cell division.</p><p>CBELife Sciences Education, 11(4), 425-436. doi:10.1187/cbe.12-01-0003</p><p></p><p>Noperi, H., Sarwanto, S., & Aminah, N. S. (2021). Pengembangan modul ilustratif</p><p>berbasis inkuiri terbimbing bermuatan pendidikan karakter. Science and</p><p>Physics Education Journal, 4(2), 70-81. doi:10.31539/spej.v4i2.2392</p><p></p><p>Nopparatjamjomras, T. R. (2012). Developing a social constructivist teaching and</p><p>learning module on DNA for high school students in Thailand. In Biology</p><p>Education for Social and Sustainable Development (pp. 233-240). Brill.</p><p></p><p>Noraini, N., Sarina, M. N., Rushami, Z. Y., & Abdul Aziz, O. (2016). Isu kesahan</p><p>dalaman terhadap kaedah penyelidikan kuasi eksperimen di dalam pendidikan</p><p>keusahawanan. Asean Entrepreneuship Journal, 2(2), 90-97.</p><p></p><p>Norhashim, A. S., Mazenah, Y., & Rose Alinda, A. (1998). Pengajaran bantuan</p><p>komputer. Skudai : Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Nowak, G. T. (1986). Western Michigan University career guidance inventory</p><p>manual. Michigan: Western Michigan University Testing and Evaluation</p><p>Services.</p><p></p><p>Nur Fazirah, R., & Eng Tek, O. (2008). Keberkesanan penggunaan modul nota</p><p>mitosis dan meiosis dan sikap pelajar terhadap penggunaannya bagi Biologi</p><p>Tingkatan 4 (Tesis yang tidak diterbitkan). Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.</p><p></p><p>Nur Salimah, A., Huzili, H., Junainor, H., Nor Syamimi, M. A., Mohamad Hashim, 0.</p><p>O., & Kamarudin, H. (2018, February). Perception of teacher on cooperative</p><p>learning. Paper presented at Malaysia Technical Universities Conference on</p><p>Engineering and Technology (MUCET 2017), Universiti Malaysia Perlis.</p><p></p><p>Nur Syarima, S., Mariny, A. G., & Yahaya, M. (2020). Kesahan dan</p><p>kebolehpercayaan instrumen ketara sedar sekolah (KSS) dan pendidikan abad</p><p>ke-21 (PAK21) berdasarkan analisis PLS-SEM. International Journal of</p><p>Education and Pedagogy, 2(4), 106-119.</p><p></p><p>Nurhazwani, M. S., Najwa Husna, S., & Hafsah, T. (2020). Exploring pre-university</p><p>students manipulative skills and understanding on mitosis. Jurnal Pendidikan</p><p>Sains & Matematik Malaysia, 10(1), 1-8. diambil daripada</p><p>https://doi.org/10.37134/jpsmm.vol10.1.1.2020</p><p></p><p>Nurlaila, L., Sriyati, S., & Riandi, R. (2018). Preliminary studies of analyzing</p><p>misconception and scientific argumentation using diagnostic question clusters</p><p>(Dqcs) of molecular genetics concept. Jurnal BIOEDUIN : Program Studi</p><p>Pendidikan Biologi, 8(2), 43-53. doi:10.15575/bioeduin.v8i2.3190</p><p></p><p>Nurlaila, L., Sriyati, S., & Riandi. (2017). Analizing student biology education</p><p>misconception and scientific argumentation ability using diagnostic question</p><p>clusters (Dqcs) of molecular genetic concept. Journal of Physics: Conference</p><p>Series, 812, 1-7. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/812/1/012112</p><p></p><p>Nussbaum, J., & Novick, S. (1982). Alternative frameworks, conceptual conflict and</p><p>accommodation: Toward a principled teaching strategy. Instructional Science,</p><p>11, 183-200. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00414279</p><p></p><p>Nwagbo, C., & Obiekwe, C. (2010). Effects of constructivist instructional approach</p><p>on students achievement in basic ecological concepts in biology. Journal of</p><p>Science Teachers Association of Nigeria, 45(1), 26-35.</p><p></p><p>Olusegun, B. S. (2015). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for teaching and</p><p>learning. Journal of Research & Method in Education, 5(6), 66-70.</p><p>doi:10.9790/7388-05616670</p><p></p><p>Ong, E. T., & Tan, S. C. (2012). Keberkesanan kaedah Numbered Heads Together</p><p>terhadap pencapaian Biologi dalam kalangan pelajar di Universiti Pendidikan</p><p>Sultan Idris. Jurnal Teknologi, 53(1), 35-46. doi:10.11113/jt.v53.112</p><p></p><p>Orcan, F. (2020). Parametric or non-parametric: Skewness to test normality for mean</p><p>comparison. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 7(2),</p><p>236-246. doi:10.21449/ijate.656077</p><p></p><p>Othman, M. (2000). Prinsip psikoterapi dan pengurusan dalam kaunseling. Serdang,</p><p>Malaysia: Universiti Putra Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Ozcan, T., Yildirim, O., & Ozgur, S. (2012). Determining of the university freshmen</p><p>students misconceptions and alternative conceptions about mitosis and</p><p>meiosis. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 3677-3680.</p><p>doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.126</p><p></p><p>Oztap, H., Ozay, E., & Oztap, F. (2003). Teaching cell division to secondary school</p><p>students: An investigation of difficulties experienced by Turkish teachers.</p><p>Journal of Biological Education, 38(1), 13-15.</p><p>doi:10.1080/00219266.2003.9655890</p><p></p><p>Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using</p><p>IBM SPSS (6th ed.). China: Everbest Printing Co. Ltd.</p><p></p><p>Pasion, R. (2019). The efficacy of strategic intervention materials (SIMS) in teaching</p><p>social studies among third year high school students. SMCC Higher Education</p><p>Research Journal, 6(1), 175-187. doi:10.18868/sherj6j.06.010119.11</p><p></p><p>Patrick, A. O. (2012). Unequal achievement of science undergraduates: Does sex</p><p>influence the differences? US-China Education Review, 6, 578-594. diambil</p><p>daripada https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED535484.pdf</p><p></p><p>Perez-Felkner, L. (2015). Attitude differences and gender. In R. Gunstone (Ed.),</p><p>Encyclopedia of science education (pp. 93-94). doi:</p><p>10.1007/978-94-007-2150-0_351</p><p></p><p>Poh, B. T., & Ng, H. K. (2008). Kesan faktor jantina, etnik dan gaya kognitif ke atas</p><p>pencapaian Pengajian Am. Journal of Educators & Education, 23, 123-140.</p><p></p><p>Popi, S., Deby Putri, P., & Yesni, O. (2021, June 30). Pengembangan bahan ajar fisika</p><p>"Analisis model pengembangan bahan ajar (4D, ADDIE, ASSURE, Hannafin</p><p>dan Peck)". Retrieved from https://osf.io/preprints/inarxiv/7bydx/</p><p></p><p>Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982).</p><p>Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual</p><p>change. Science Education, 66(2), 211-227.</p><p></p><p>Prakash, M., Raj, B., Khanal, B., Krishna, R., & Belbase, S. (2021). Eighth grade</p><p>students misconceptions and errors in mathematics learning in Nepal.</p><p>European Journal of Educational Research, 10(3), 1101-1121.</p><p>doi:10.12973/eu-jer.10.3.1101</p><p></p><p>Prastyo, D. D., Amin, M., & Susanto, H. (2021). Effectiveness of genetic module to</p><p>reduce misconception levels and improve cognitive learning outcomes of</p><p>grade XII students of SMA Negeri 5 Malang. Journal of Disruptive Learning</p><p>Innovation (JODLI), Vol. 2 (2), 2021, 2(2), 89-97.</p><p></p><p>Price, C. G., Knee, E. M., Miller, J. A., Shin, D., Mann, J., Crist, D. K., Grotewold,</p><p>E. (2018). Following phenotypes: An exploration of mendelian genetics using</p><p>arabidopsis plants. The American Biology Teacher, 80(4), 291-300.</p><p>doi:10.1525/abt.2018.80.4.291</p><p></p><p>Quillin, K., & Thomas, S. (2015). Drawing-to-Learn: A framework for using</p><p>drawings to promote model-based reasoning in biology. CBELife Sciences</p><p>Education, 14(1), es2. doi:10.1187/cbe.14-08-0128</p><p></p><p>Radanovi, I., Luka, ., Garai, D., Basti, M, Markovi, N., Furlan, Z., Dolenec, T.,</p><p>Begi,V., Kapov, S., tigli, N. & Petra, T., I., Luka, T., Garai, D., Basti,</p><p>M., Markovi, N., Furlan, Z., & Dolenec, T. (2011). External evaluation</p><p>exams in Biology in the eighth grade in the school year 2010/2011 - Main</p><p>examination. (pp. 1-114). diambil daripada National Center for External</p><p>Evaluation of Education, Zagreb website:</p><p>http://dokumenti.ncvvo.hr/OS/Izvjesca/izvjesce_bio_2010_2011.pdf</p><p></p><p>Rafiee, J., & Hafsah, T. (2020). Analisis keperluan kebolehgunaan aplikasi mudah</p><p>alih terhadap sikap, minat dan pengetahuan asas matematik tahun 4. Jurnal</p><p>Pendidikan Sains & Matematik Malaysia, 10(1), 9-15.</p><p></p><p>Rahdiyanta, D. (2012). Teknik penyusunan modul [PDF]. diambil daripada</p><p>http://staffnew.uny.ac.id/staff/131569341</p><p></p><p>Ramli, I., Jamal, N., & Marinah, A. (2020). Analisis data dan pelaporan dalam</p><p>penyelidikan pendidikan. Tanjong Malim, Perak: Penerbit Universiti</p><p>Pendidikan Sultan Idris.</p><p></p><p>Ria Rosita. (2018). Improving the high school students' appeal and effectiveness in</p><p>the history learning through inquiry based digital module design. Social</p><p>Science Learning Education Journal, 03(12), 01-09.</p><p>doi:10.15520/sslej.v3i12.2377</p><p></p><p>Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2007). Design and development research. New Jersey,</p><p>NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.</p><p></p><p>Rodrguez Gil, S. G., Fradkin, M., & Castaeda-Sortibrn, A. N. (2019). Conceptions</p><p>of meiosis: Misunderstandings among university students and errors. Journal</p><p>of Biological Education, 53(2), 191-204.</p><p>doi:10.1080/00219266.2018.1469531</p><p></p><p>Rohaendi, S., & Laelasari, N. I. (2020). Penerapan teori Piaget dan Vygotsky ruang</p><p>lingkup bilangan dan aljabar pada siswa mts plus Karangwangi. Prisma, 9(1),</p><p>65. doi:10.35194/jp.v9i1.886</p><p></p><p>Roini, C., & Sundari. (2018). Using certainty of responses index (CRI) for assessment</p><p>to identify graduate students misconceptions in genetics. Proceedings of the</p><p>1st International Conference on Teaching and Learning.</p><p>doi:10.5220/0008899502110217</p><p></p><p>Roseman, J. E., Caldwell, A., Gogos, A., & Kurth, L. (2006). Mapping a coherent</p><p>learning progression for the molecular basis of heredity. diambil daripada</p><p>American Association for the Advancement of Science website:</p><p>http://www.project2061.org/publications/articles/papers/narst2006.pdf</p><p></p><p>Rosenberg, M. (2012, May 21). Beyond competence: Its the journey to mastery that</p><p>counts. Learning Solutions Magazine. diambil daripada</p><p>www.learningsolutionsmag.com/articles/930/beyondcompetence-its-the-journ</p><p>ey-to-masterythat-counts</p><p></p><p>Rotbain, Y., Marbach-Ad, G., & Stavy, R. (2007). Using a computer animation to</p><p>teach high school molecular biology. Journal of Science Education and</p><p>Technology, 17(1), 49-58. doi:10.1007/s10956-007-9080-4</p><p></p><p>Rotbain, Y., Marbach-Ad, G., & Stavy, R. (2005). Understanding molecular genetics</p><p>through a drawing-based activity. Journal of Biological Education, 39(4),</p><p>174-178. doi:10.1080/00219266.2005.9655992</p><p></p><p>Rulina, S. (2014). Penerapan model pembelajaran koperatif tipe student facilitator and</p><p>explaning untuk meningkatkan aktivitas belajar ips terpadu. Wahana Inovasi,</p><p>3(2), 384-399. diambil daripada http://penelitian.uisu.ac.id/</p><p></p><p>Russel, J. D. (1974). Modular instruction: A guide to the design, selection, utilization</p><p>and evaluation of modular materials. New York: Publishing Company.</p><p></p><p>Sadiah, B. (2008). Kesan paduan kitar pembelajaran dan pemetaan konsep terhadap</p><p>konsepsi pelajar tentang pembahagian sel (Disertasi kedoktoran, Universiti</p><p>Sains Malaysia, Gelugor, Pulau Pinang). diambil daripada</p><p>http://eprints.usm.my/id/eprint/9964</p><p></p><p>Safrida, S., Dewi, C. R., & Abdullah, A. (2017). Penggunaan modul dan media</p><p>animasi dalam mengurangi miskonsepsi siswa pada materi sistem peredaran</p><p>darah di SMAN 5 Kota Banda Aceh. Jurnal Pencerahan, 11(1), 39-45.</p><p></p><p>Saper, M. N., Mohd Daud, N. A., & Ahmad, N. (2016). Kesahan dan</p><p>kebolehpercayaan Modul I-Sc (Islamic spiritual counseling) ke atas pelajar</p><p>bermasalah tingkah laku. International Journal of Islamic Thought, 9(1),</p><p>32-43. doi:10.24035/ijit.09.2016.004</p><p></p><p>Sharifah Alwiah, A. (1981). Pengenalan pengajaran individu dengan tumpuan khas</p><p>kepada modul pengajaran dan modul pembelajaran. Pendidik dan Pendidikan,</p><p>3(1), 46-57. diambil daripada http://apjee.usm.my/vol03_1981.html</p><p></p><p>Shea, N. A., Duncan, R. G., & Stephenson, C. (2014). A tri-part model for genetics</p><p>literacy: Exploring undergraduate student reasoning about authentic genetics</p><p>dilemmas. Research in Science Education, 45(4), 485-507.</p><p>doi:10.1007/s11165-014-9433-y</p><p></p><p>Sidek, M. N. (1997). Modul penilaian dalam kaunseling. Serdang: Universiti Putra</p><p>Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Sidek, M. N., & Jamaludin, A. (2005). Pembinaan modul: Bagaimana membina</p><p>modul latihan dan modul akademik. Serdang, Malaysia: Universiti Putra</p><p>Malaysia.</p><p></p><p>Siritunga, D., Montero-Rojas, M., Carrero, K., Toro, G., Vlez, A., &</p><p>Carrero-Martnez, F. A. (2011). Culturally relevant inquiry-based laboratory</p><p>module implementations in upper-division genetics and cell biology teaching</p><p>laboratories. CBELife Sciences Education, 10(3), 287-297.</p><p>doi:10.1187/cbe.11-04-0035</p><p></p><p>Siti Ramdiah, & Corebima, A. D. (2014). Learning strategy equalizing students</p><p>achievement, metacognitive and critical thinking skills. American Journal of</p><p>Educational Research, 2(8), 577-584. doi:10.12691/education-2-8-3</p><p></p><p>Siti Seri Kartini, M. Y., Salmiza, S., Hutkemri, & Yew, W. T. (2021). Development</p><p>and usability of B-Geo module in differentiation topic using ASSURE model</p><p>of instructional design. Journal of Educational Research and Indigenous</p><p>Studies, 3(1), 94-117.</p><p></p><p>Siti Shahida, M. A., & Che Nidzam, C. A. (2014). Penggunaan modul pembelajaran</p><p>dan pengajaran berasaskan analogi terhadap pencapaian pelajar bagi topik</p><p>Enzim dalam biologi tingkatan 4. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematik</p><p>Malaysia, 4(2), 91-103.</p><p></p><p>Slavin, R. E. (2015). Cooperative learning in elementary schools. Education, 43(1),</p><p>5-14. doi:10.1080/03004279.2015.963370</p><p></p><p>Slavin, R. E. (1980). Cooperative learning. Review of Educational Research, 50(2),</p><p>315-342. doi:10.3102/00346543050002315</p><p></p><p>Slavin, R. E. (2008). Cooperative learning, success for all, and evidence-based reform</p><p>in education. ducation et didactique, 2(2), 149-157.</p><p>doi:10.4000/educationdidactique.334</p><p></p><p>Smith, M. K., & Knight, J. K. (2012). Using the genetics concept assessment to</p><p>document persistent conceptual difficulties in undergraduate genetics courses.</p><p>Genetics, 191(1), 21-32. doi:10.1534/genetics.111.137810</p><p></p><p>Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. S. (1999). Effects of small-group learning</p><p>on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A</p><p>meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 21-51.</p><p>doi:10.3102/00346543069001021</p><p></p><p>Sri Wardani, Sri Nurhayati, & Aulia Safitri. (2016). The effectiveness of the guided</p><p>inquiry learning module towards students. International Journal of Science</p><p>and Research (IJSR), 5(6), 1589-1594. doi:10.21275/v5i6.nov164512</p><p></p><p>Stefanski, K. M., Gardner, G. E., & Seipelt-Thiemann, R. L. (2016). Development of</p><p>aLacOperon concept inventory (LOCI). CBELife Sciences Education, 15(2),</p><p>1-11. doi:10.1187/cbe.15-07-0162</p><p></p><p>Stern, F., & Kampourakis, K. (2017). Teaching for genetics literacy in the</p><p>post-genomic era. Studies in Science Education, 53(2), 193-225.</p><p>doi:10.1080/03057267.2017.1392731</p><p></p><p>Stoet, G., & Geary, D. C. (2020). Sex-specific academic ability and attitude patterns</p><p>in students across developed countries. Intelligence, 81, 1-10.</p><p>doi:10.1016/j.intell.2020.101453</p><p></p><p>Strand, S., & Boes, K. E. (2019). Drawing a link between genetic inheritance and</p><p>meiosis: A set of exercises for the undergraduate biology classroom. Journal</p><p>of Microbiology & Biology Education, 20(2), 1-8.</p><p>doi:10.1128/jmbe.v20i2.1733</p><p></p><p>Strike, K. A., & Posner, G. J. (1992). A revisionist theory of conceptual change. In</p><p>R. A. Duschl & R. J. Hamilton (Eds.), Philosophy of science, cognitive</p><p>psychology, and educational theory and practice (p. 147176). Albany, NY:</p><p>SUNY Press.</p><p></p><p>Suherman, D. P., Purwianingsih, W., & Diana, S. (2018). Analisis hubungan</p><p>self-efficacy dan metakognitif terhadap hasil belajar siswa sma berdasarkan</p><p>gender pada konsep genetika. Assimilation: Indonesian Journal of Biology</p><p>Education, 1(1), 14-20. doi:10.17509/aijbe.v1i1.11450</p><p></p><p>Sulfemi, W. B. (2018). Hubungan motivasi belajar dengan hasil belajar IPS di SMP</p><p>Kabupaten Bogor. Jurnal Ilmiah Edutecno, 18(1), 1-12.</p><p>doi:10.31227/osf.io/u8nvd</p><p></p><p>Suratsih, Henuhili, V., Rahayu, T., & Hidayat, M. L. (2009). Pengembangan modul</p><p>pembelajaran genetika berbasis fenomena lokal. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 28(2),</p><p>165-176.</p><p></p><p>Surendran, S., & Norazlinda, S. (2019). Pembelajaran mod teradun berasaskan modul</p><p>interactive lecture dalam kalangan pelajar. Jurnal Pembangunan Sosial, 22,</p><p>1-9. doi:10.32890/jps.22.2019.12672</p><p></p><p>Susanti, D., Fitriani, V., & Sari, L. Y. (2020). Validity of module based on project</p><p>based learning in media biology subject. Journal of Physics: Conference</p><p>Series, 1521, 042012. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1521/4/042012</p><p></p><p>Suwono, Hadi; Prasetyo, Triastono Imam; Lestari, Umie; Lukiati, Betty; Fachrunnisa,</p><p>Rifka; Kusairi, Sentot; Saefi, Muhammad; Fauzi, Ahmad; Atho'Illah,</p><p>Mochammad Fitri, H., Prasetyo, T. I., Lestari, U., Lukiati, B., Fachrunnisa, R.,</p><p></p><p>Saefi, S., & Atho'Illah, M. F. (2021). Cell biology diagnostic test (CBD-Test)</p><p>portrays pre-service teacher misconceptions about biology cell. Journal of</p><p>Biological Education, 55(1), 82-105.</p><p></p><p>Syaharom, A. (1990). Practical guide to educational research (Edisi terjemahan).</p><p>Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.</p><p></p><p>Tan, K. C. (2000). Development and application of a diagnostic instrument to</p><p>evaluate secondary students conceptions of qualitative analysis (Disertasi</p><p>kedoktoran). Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Australia .</p><p></p><p>Tekkaya, C. (2002). Misconceptions as barrier to understanding biology. Journal of</p><p>Faculty of Education, 23, 259-266. diambil daripada</p><p>https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6677/b6a7211f31f5ff9da14bede0b0c00a5004</p><p>15.pdf</p><p></p><p>Thrne, K., & Gericke, N. (2013). Teaching genetics in secondary classrooms: A</p><p>linguistic analysis of teachers talk about proteins. Research in Science</p><p>Education, 44(1), 81-108. doi:10.1007/s11165-013-9375-9</p><p></p><p>Todd, A., & Kenyon, L. (2015). Empirical refinements of a molecular genetics</p><p>learning progression: The molecular constructs. Journal of Research in</p><p>Science Teaching, 53(9), 1385-1418. doi:10.1002/tea.21262</p><p></p><p>Todd, A., & Romine, W. (2018). The learning loss effect in genetics: What ideas do</p><p>students retain or lose after instruction? CBELife Sciences Education, 17(4),</p><p>ar55. doi:10.1187/cbe.16-10-0310</p><p></p><p>Topcu, M. S., & Sahin-pekmez, E. (2009). Turkish middle school students</p><p>difficulties in learning genetics concepts. Journal of Turkish Science</p><p>Education, 6(2), 55-62. diambil daripada</p><p>https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2995/148cad2ebac1b7a8a09c39bbfa3bc789c7</p><p>9e.pdf</p><p></p><p>Tran, U. S., Hofer, A. A., & Voracek, M. (2014). Sex differences in general</p><p>knowledge: Meta-analysis and new data on the contribution of school-related</p><p>moderators among high-school students. Plos One, 9(10), e110391.</p><p>doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0110391</p><p></p><p>Treagust, D. F. (1988). Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students</p><p>misconceptions in science. International Journal of Science Education, 10(2),</p><p>159-169. doi:10.1080/0950069880100204</p><p></p><p>Trianto. (2009). Mendesain model pembelajaran inovatif progresif. Surabaya,</p><p>Indonesia: Kencana.</p><p></p><p>Tsui, C., & Treagust, D. F. (2007). Understanding genetics: Analysis of secondary</p><p>students' conceptual status. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(2),</p><p>205-235. doi:10.1002/tea.20116</p><p></p><p>Tsui, C., & Treagust, D. (2010). Evaluating secondary students scientific reasoning</p><p>in genetics using a twotier diagnostic instrument. International Journal of</p><p>Science Education, 32(8), 1073-1098. doi:10.1080/09500690902951429</p><p></p><p>Tuckman, B. W., & Waheed, M. A. (1981). Evaluating an individualized science</p><p>program for community college students. Journal of Research in Science</p><p>Teaching, 18(6), 489-495. doi:10.1002/tea.3660180603</p><p></p><p>Utomo, F. W., & Sugihartati, R. (2018). Diversitas persepsi masyarakat terhadap</p><p>pendidikan. SOCIA: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 15(2), 197-203.</p><p>doi:10.21831/socia.v15i2.22678</p><p></p><p>Valette, R. M. (1977). Modern language testing: A hand book (2nd ed.). New York:</p><p>Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.</p><p></p><p>Vlckova, J., Kubiatko, M., & Usak, M. (2016). Czech high school students'</p><p>misconceptions about basic genetic concepts : Preliminary results. Journal of</p><p>Baltic Science Education, 15(6), 738-745. diambil daripada</p><p>https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312164010</p><p></p><p>Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society : The development of higher psychological</p><p>processes. M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.).</p><p>London, England: Harvard University Press.</p><p></p><p>Wan Norafifah, W. M. (2018). Pelaksanaan Flipped Classroom dalam pembelajaran</p><p>dan pemudahcaraan (pdpc) ke arah meningkatkan pencapaian dan motivasi</p><p>pelajar matrikulasi (Unpublished master's thesis). Universiti Pendidikan</p><p>Sultan Idris.</p><p></p><p>Webb, N. M., & Palincsar., A. S. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. In D. C.</p><p>Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology.</p><p>Macmillan Library Reference USA: Prentice Hall International.</p><p></p><p>Weldon, L. C. (2014). Measuring difference in knowledge achievement and</p><p>satisfaction between viewing interactive and linear online learning modules</p><p>(Tesis sarjana). diambil daripada https://doi.org/10.31274/etd-180810-1416</p><p></p><p>Williams, M., Montgomery, B. L., & Manokore, V. (2012). From phenotype to</p><p>genotype: Exploring middle school students' understanding of genetic</p><p>inheritance in a web-based environment. The American Biology Teacher,</p><p>74(1), 35-40. doi:10.1525/abt.2012.74.1.8</p><p></p><p>Wolyniak, M. J. (2013). Improved student linkage of Mendelian and molecular</p><p>genetic concepts through a yeast-based laboratory module. Biochemistry and</p><p>Molecular Biology Education, 41(3), 163-172. doi:10.1002/bmb.20679</p><p></p><p>Wright, L. K., & Newman, D. L. (2011). An interactive modeling lesson increases</p><p>students' understanding of ploidy during meiosis. Biochemistry and Molecular</p><p>Biology Education, 39(5), 344-351. doi:10.1002/bmb.20523</p><p></p><p>Yang, X., Hartman, M. R., Harrington, K. T., Etson, C. M., Fierman, M. B., Slonim,</p><p>D. K., & Walt, D. R. (2017). Using next-generation sequencing to explore</p><p>genetics and race in the high school classroom. CBELife Sciences Education,</p><p>16(2), ar22. doi:10.1187/cbe.16-09-0281</p><p></p><p>Yip, D. (1998). Identification of misconceptions in novice biology teachers and</p><p>remedial strategies for improving biology learning. International Journal of</p><p>Science Education, 20(4), 461-477. doi:10.1080/0950069980200406</p><p></p><p>Zalizan M. Jelas, M. J., Amla Salleh, S., Izwan Mahmud, M., Norzaini Azman, A.,</p><p>Hanizah Hamzah, H., Zaleha Abd. Hamid, A. H., & Rohana Jani, J. (2014).</p><p>Gender disparity in school participation and achievement: The case in</p><p>Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 140 ( 2014 ) 62 68,</p><p>140, 62-68. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.387</p><p></p> |