Exploring assessment reform in Malaysian primary schools

<p>This study aims to explore the implementation of assessment reform initiatives known</p><p>as the National Education Assessment System (NEAS) from the perspectives of</p><p>school adminstrators and teachers and in two primary s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Shanusi Ahmad
Format: thesis
Language:eng
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=9502
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:9502
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
collection UPSI Digital Repository
language eng
topic LB Theory and practice of education
spellingShingle LB Theory and practice of education
Shanusi Ahmad
Exploring assessment reform in Malaysian primary schools
description <p>This study aims to explore the implementation of assessment reform initiatives known</p><p>as the National Education Assessment System (NEAS) from the perspectives of</p><p>school adminstrators and teachers and in two primary schools. The objectives of the</p><p>study were: (a) to explore the approaches developed by schools in response to NEAS,</p><p>(b) to explore the factors which affect the implementation of NEAS, and (c) to</p><p>identify the factors in schools which impact upon the implementation of NEAS. The</p><p>main model used in this study was Concern-Based Adoption Model (CBAM). This</p><p>model explained about the teachers concern within a context of assessment reform.</p><p>This study used a qualitative case study which involved 8 informants from two</p><p>primary schools. Semi-structure interview protocol and document analysis were the</p><p>insruments used to collect qualitative data. Qualitative data analysis using thematic</p><p>analysis was also utilised in this study. The supportive result shows that the</p><p>relationship among the teachers, management team, students, parents and community</p><p>are crucial to facilitate the implementation of the NEAS. In addition, teachers beliefs,</p><p>leadership quality, and school culture were also critical elements. However, the</p><p>suppressive factors for NEAS implementation such as low teachers morale and</p><p>negative students attitude were the emerging themes from the study. In other words,</p><p>there is a need to improve not only the system but also the delivery of the NEAS. In</p><p>conclusion, the study found that the critical factors such as school leaderships</p><p>support, teachers beliefs and training are pertinent to facilitate the implementation of</p><p>NEAS. In implication, the framework developed by this study can be used by the</p><p>Malaysian Examination Syndicate, school administrators, and teachers to revamp or</p><p>redesign the current NEAS implementation.</p>
format thesis
qualification_name
qualification_level Doctorate
author Shanusi Ahmad
author_facet Shanusi Ahmad
author_sort Shanusi Ahmad
title Exploring assessment reform in Malaysian primary schools
title_short Exploring assessment reform in Malaysian primary schools
title_full Exploring assessment reform in Malaysian primary schools
title_fullStr Exploring assessment reform in Malaysian primary schools
title_full_unstemmed Exploring assessment reform in Malaysian primary schools
title_sort exploring assessment reform in malaysian primary schools
granting_institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
granting_department Fakulti Pembangunan Manusia
publishDate 2022
url https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=9502
_version_ 1783730268901736448
spelling oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:95022023-09-14 Exploring assessment reform in Malaysian primary schools 2022 Shanusi Ahmad LB Theory and practice of education <p>This study aims to explore the implementation of assessment reform initiatives known</p><p>as the National Education Assessment System (NEAS) from the perspectives of</p><p>school adminstrators and teachers and in two primary schools. The objectives of the</p><p>study were: (a) to explore the approaches developed by schools in response to NEAS,</p><p>(b) to explore the factors which affect the implementation of NEAS, and (c) to</p><p>identify the factors in schools which impact upon the implementation of NEAS. The</p><p>main model used in this study was Concern-Based Adoption Model (CBAM). This</p><p>model explained about the teachers concern within a context of assessment reform.</p><p>This study used a qualitative case study which involved 8 informants from two</p><p>primary schools. Semi-structure interview protocol and document analysis were the</p><p>insruments used to collect qualitative data. Qualitative data analysis using thematic</p><p>analysis was also utilised in this study. The supportive result shows that the</p><p>relationship among the teachers, management team, students, parents and community</p><p>are crucial to facilitate the implementation of the NEAS. In addition, teachers beliefs,</p><p>leadership quality, and school culture were also critical elements. However, the</p><p>suppressive factors for NEAS implementation such as low teachers morale and</p><p>negative students attitude were the emerging themes from the study. In other words,</p><p>there is a need to improve not only the system but also the delivery of the NEAS. In</p><p>conclusion, the study found that the critical factors such as school leaderships</p><p>support, teachers beliefs and training are pertinent to facilitate the implementation of</p><p>NEAS. In implication, the framework developed by this study can be used by the</p><p>Malaysian Examination Syndicate, school administrators, and teachers to revamp or</p><p>redesign the current NEAS implementation.</p> 2022 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=9502 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=9502 text eng closedAccess Doctoral Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Pembangunan Manusia <p>Abdullah, N., Wahab, N. A., Noh, N. M., Abdullah, E. M., & Ahmad, A. (2016). The evaluation and effectiveness of school based assessment among science teachers in Malaysia using CIPP Model. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 3(11), 1-7.</p><p>Adamson, B. (2014). Embedding assessment for learning. In R. Berry & B. Adamson (Eds.), Assessment reform in education: Policy and practice (pp. 197-204). New York, NY: Springer.</p><p>Adlam, R. (2003). This Complex Thing, Leadership, in Police Leadership in the Twenty First Century. Winchester: Waterside Press: 204-222.</p><p>Adserias, R. P., Charleston, L. J., & Jackson, J. F. (2017). What style of leadership is best suited to direct organizational change to fuel institutional diversity in higher education?. Race Ethnicity and Education, 20(3), 315-331.</p><p>Ahmad, R. (1998). Educational development and reformation in Malaysia: past, present and future. Journal of Educational Administration, 36 (5), 462-475.</p><p>Alkharusi, H., Aldhafri, S., Alnabhani, H., & Alkalbani, M. (2014). Classroom Assessment: Teacher Practices, Student Perceptions, and Academic Self-Efficacy Beliefs. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 42(5), 835855. doi:10.2224/sbp.2014.42.5.835</p><p>Allen, L. (2002). Teachers' pedagogical beliefs and the standards for foreign language learning. Foreign Language Annals, 35(5), 518-529.</p><p>Allen, L. & Glickman, C.D. (1998) Restructuring and Renewal: capturing the power of democracy, in A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan & D. Hopkins (Eds), The International Handbook of Educational Change, Part One (London, Kluwer Academic Publishers).</p><p>Almarza, G. (1996). Student foreign language teachers' knowledge growth. In D. Freeman & J. Richards (Eds.), Teacher Learning in Language Teaching (pp. 50-78). Cambridge: CUP</p><p>Al Masarweh, M. (2019). Evaluating M-Learning System Adoption by Faculty Members in Saudi Arabia Using Concern Based Adoption Model (CBAM) Stages of Concern. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 14(5), 153-164.</p><p>Altrichter, H. (2000) Introduction, in H. Altrichter & J. Elliott (Eds), Images of Educational Change (Buckingham, Open University Press).</p><p>Anderson, T. D., Ford, R. & Hamilton, M. 1998. Transforming Leadership: equipping yourself and coaching others to build leadership organisation. 6th edition. London: St Lucie Press.</p><p>Andrade, H., & Brookhart, S. M. (2016). The role of classroom assessment in supporting self-regulated learning. In Assessment for learning: Meeting the challenge of implementation (pp. 293-309). Springer, Cham.</p><p>Andrews, S. (2003). 'Just like instant noodles': L2 teachers and their beliefs about grammar pedagogy. Teachers and Teaching, 9(4), 351-375.</p><p>Anthony, B., Kamaludin, A., Romli, A., Raffei, A. F. M., Abdullah, A., Ming, G. L., ... & Baba, S. (2019). Exploring the role of blended learning for teaching and learning effectiveness in institutions of higher learning: An empirical investigation. Education and Information Technologies, 24(6), 3433-3466. Aypay, A., & Kalayci, S.S. (2008), Assessing institutionalization of educational reforms. International Journal of Educational Development, 28, 723-736.</p><p>Baehr M. Distinctions Between Assessment and Evaluation. In: Beyerlein SM, Apple DK, editors. Faculty Guidebook: A Comprehensive Tool of Improving Faculty Performance. Lisle, Ill: Pacific Crest; 2004. pp. 2914.</p><p>Baki, A. & Birgin, O. (2004). Reflections of Using Computer-Based Portfolios as an Alternative Assessment Tools: A Case Study. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 3 (3), Article 11, http://www.tojet.net/articles/3311.htm</p><p>Ball, S.J. (2008). The education debate. Bristol: The Policy Press.</p><p>Ball, S.J. (2003). The teachers soul and the terrors of performativity, Journal of Education Policy, 8(2), 215-228.</p><p>Ball, S.J. (2001) Youve been NERFed! Dumbing down the academy: National Educational Research Forum: a national consultation paper: a brief and bilious response, Journal of Education Policy, 16(3), 265- 268.</p><p>Ball, S.J. (1987) The micropolitics of the school: towards a theory of school organization (London, Methuen).</p><p>Barnett, A. M., Marsh, H. W., & Craven, R. G. (2003). What type of school leadership satisfied teachers? A mixed method approach to teachers perceptions of satisfaction. Self Research Center, University of Western Sydney, Australia.</p><p>Biesta, G. J. J. (2004). Education, accountability, and the ethical demand: Can the democratic potential of accountability be regained. Educational Theory, 54(3), 233-250.</p><p>Bellon, T. & Beaudry, J. (1992, April). Teachers' perceptions of their leadership roles in site-based decision making. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.</p><p>Bennett, A. and Elman, C. (2006a) Qualitative Research: Recent Developments in Case Study Methods, Annual Review of Political Science, 9, 455-476.</p><p>Berg, B. L., & Lune, H. (2012). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.</p><p>Berry, A. & Adamson, B. (2012). Assessment Reforms in Hong Kong Schools. SA-eDUC JOURNAL, Volume 9, Number 1, 1-11.</p><p>Birgin, O. & Baki, A. (2007). The use of portfolio to assess students performance. Journal of Turkish Science Education 4.2, 7591</p><p>Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2003) Assessment for learning: putting it into practice. Buckingham: Open University Press.</p><p>Black, P., & Wouldiam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 1 (1), 1-40.</p><p>Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2006) Developing a theory of formative assessment. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (pp. 81-100). London: Sage.</p><p>Black, P., & Wouldiam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: raising standards through classroom assessment. London: Kings College.</p><p>Blase, J. (1998) The Micropolitics of Educational Change, in A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan & D. Hopkins (Eds.), The International Handbook of Educational Change, Part One (London, Kluwer Academic Publishers).</p><p>Block, J. & Hazelip, K. (1995). Teachers' beliefs and belief systems. In L. Anderson (Ed. ), International Encyclopedia of Teaching and Teacher Education (2d ed., pp 25-28) Oxford: Elsevier.</p><p>Bogdan, R. C. & Biklen, S. K. (2003) Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson.</p><p>Bolden, R. (2011), "Distributed Leadership in Organizations: A Review of Theory and Research", International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 13, pp. 251-269.</p><p>Bolman, L. & Deal, T. (1991). Reframing Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.</p><p>Borg, S. (2006). Teacher Cognition and Language Education. London: Continuum.</p><p>Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe and do. Language Teaching, 36(2), 81-109.</p><p>Borg, S. (2001). Self-perception and practice in teaching grammar. ELT Journal, -55(l). 21-29.</p><p>Borg, S. (1998). Teachers' pedagogical systems and grammar teaching: A qualitative study. TESOL Quarterly, 32(1), 9-38.</p><p>Brookhart, M. S. (2007). Expanding Views About Formative Classroom Assessment: A Review of the Literature: McMillan H.J. (Editor) : Teacher College Press.</p><p>Buchen, I. H. (2003), Education in America: the next 25 years, The Futurist, 37(7), 44-56</p><p>Burns, A. (2003). Beliefs as research, research as action, beliefs and action research for teacher education. In B. Beaven & S. Borg (Eds. ). The Role of Research in Teacher Education (pp. 6-11). Whitstable, Kent: IATEFL.</p><p>Burns, A. (1992). Teacher beliefs and their influence on classroom practice. Prospect 7(3), 56-66</p><p>Cabaroglu,N. & Roberts, J. (2000). Development in student teachers' pre-existing beliefs during a 1-year PGCE programme. System, 28(3), 387-402.</p><p>Cakan,M. (2004). Practice and Competency Level Assessment and Evaluation of Teachers: Primary and Secondary Education. Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences Journal, 37 (2), 99-114</p><p>Calderhead, J. (1996) The quality of reflection in student teachers professional learning, European Journal of Teacher Education, 10, pp. 269278.</p><p>Campbell, R., & Ahrens, C. E. (1998). Innovative community services for rape victims: An application of multiple case study methodology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 26, 537-571.</p><p>Capper, P. & Wouldiams, B. (2004). Enhancing evaluation using systems concepts. American Evaluation Association. http://users.actrix.co.nz/bobwould/activity.doc [viewed 2 Sep 2016, verified 3 Aug 2018]</p><p>Capper, P. & Wouldiams, B. (2004). Enhancing evaluation using systems concepts. American Evaluation Association. http://users.actrix.co.nz/bobwould/activity.doc [viewed 2 Sep 2018, verified 3 Aug 2019]</p><p>Carter, K. (1990) Teachers knowledge and learning to teach, in: W. R. HOUSTON (Ed.) Handbook of Research on Teacher Education (New York, MacMillan).</p><p>Chapelle, C. & Duff, P. (Eds.). (2003). Some guidelines for conducting quantitative and qualitative research in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 37, 157-178</p><p>Chapman, D. W. & Snyder, C. W. (1997). Improving Classroom Practice in Botswana: School Research, National Policy and Teachers, in A Handbook of Research on Education, Teaching and Teacher Education in Botswana, edited by P. T. M. Marope & D. W. Chapman. Gaborone: Lentswe La Lesedi: 89-104.</p><p>Chapman, K. (2010, July 4). Ensuring standards are kept. The Star</p><p>Charmaz, K. (2005). Grounded theory in the 21st century: applications for advancing social justice studies. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). (pp. 507e535) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage</p><p>Chiam, H.K. (1984). The elite, exam oriented education system: A socio-psychological critique. Paper presented in Seminar on Education and Development: Key Questions on Malaysian Education. November 1822, to Consumers Association of Penang, Malaysia.</p><p>Chin, H., Thien, L. M., & Chiew, C. M. (2019). The reforms of national assessments in Malaysian education system. Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS), 4(1), 93-111.</p><p>Choi, C. C. (1999). Public examination in Hong Kong. Assessment in Education, 6(3), 405-417.</p><p>Cheung, D. (2001). School-based Assessment in Public Examinations: Identifying the Concerns of Teachers. Education Journal , 29 (2), 105-123.</p><p>Clark, C. & Peterson, P. (1986). Teachers' thought processes. In M. Wittrock (Ed. ), Handbook of Research on Teaching (3rd ed., pp. 255-296). New York: MacMillan</p><p>Clark, C. & Yinger, R. (1977). Research on teacher thinking. Curriculum Inquiry, 7, 279-304.</p><p>Cohen, L., & Manion, L., & Morrison, K., (2000) (5th Edition), Research Methods in Education, London: RoutledgeFalmer</p><p>Collis, J. & Hussey, R. (2003) Business Research: a practical guide for undergraduate and postgraduate students, second edition.Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.</p><p>Cotton, D. R. E. (2006). Implementing curriculum guidance on environmental education: The importance of teachers beliefs. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38, 6783.</p><p>Cowen, J. E. (2003). A balanced approach to beginning reading instruction: A synthesis of six major U.S. research studies. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.</p><p>Crawford, J. (2003). "The National Literacy Strategy: Teacher Knowledge, Skills and Beliefs, and Impact on Progress." Support for Learning 18(2): 71-76.</p><p>Crawford, K., & Hasan, H. (2006). Demonstrations of the Activity Theory Framework for Research in Information Systems. Austaralasian Journal of Information Systems, 13, pp. 49-68.</p><p>Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research Design : Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches . Sage Publication. Thousands Oak. California</p><p>Cronin-Jones, L. L. (1991). Science teacher beliefs and their influence on curriculum implementation: Two case studies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 235250.</p><p>Cuban, L. (1998). How schools change reforms: redefining reform success and failure. Teachers College Record , 99 (3), 453-477.</p><p>Cuban, L. (1990). Reforming Again, Again, and Again. American Educational Research Association , 1-13.</p><p>Datnow, A. (2020). The role of teachers in educational reform: A 20-year perspective. Journal of Educational Change, 1-11.</p><p>Demir, S. (2009). Teacher perceptions of classroom management and problematic behaviors in primary schools. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 584-589.</p><p>Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K.</p><p>Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), (2000) Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.), pp. 1-28. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications.</p><p>Desforges. C. (1995), Introduction and overview. In C. Desforges (Ed.), An introduction to teaching (pp. 1-7)). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.</p><p>Desimone, L. M. (2009), Improving impact studies of teachers professional development: toward better conceptualizations and measures, Educational Reseacher, 38(3), 181-199</p><p>Dochy, F. (2001). A new assessment era: Different needs, new challenges. Research Dialogue in Learning and Instruction, 10(2), 11-20.</p><p>Donmoyer, R. (1990). Generalizability and the single-case study. In: E. W. Eisner & A. Peshkin (eds.), Qualitative Inquiry in Education: The Continuing Debate. New York: Teachers College Press, pp. 175200.</p><p>Doob, L. W. (1947), The Behavior of Attitudes, Psychological Review, 54 (3), 13556.</p><p>Doyle, W., & Ponder., G. A. (1977). The practicality ethic in teacher decision making. Interchange, 8(3), 1-12.</p><p>Dubrin, A. J. (1998). Leadership: Research, Findings, Practice and Skills. 2nd edition. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.</p><p>Elbaz, F. (1983). Teacher Thinking: A Study of Practical Knowledge. London: Croom Helm.</p><p>Elmore, R. (2004). School reform from the inside out: Policy, practice and performance. Boston, MA: Harvard Education Press.</p><p>Eisner, E.W. (1996) Curriculum and Cognition Reconsidered (London, Paul Chapman Publishing)</p><p>Eisner, E.W. (1992) Educational reform and the ecology of schooling, Teachers College Record, 93 (4), 610-626.</p><p>Engestrm Y (2001) Expansive Learning at Work: Toward an Activity-Theoretical Reconceptualization in Journal of Education and Work 14 (1), 133-156</p><p>Engestrm Y (1996a) Developmental Work Research as Educational Research: Looking Ten Years Back and Into the Zone of Proximal Development Nordisk Pedagogik 16 (3), 131-143</p><p>Engestrm Y (1996b) Interobjectivity, Ideality, and Dialectics in Mind, Culture, and Activity 3 (4), 259-265</p><p>Engestrm Y (1993) Developmental Studies of Work as a Test Bench of Activity Theory. In Lave J and Chaiklin S [Eds] Understanding Practice: Perspectives on Activity and Context Cambridge University Press New York 64-103</p><p>Engestrom, Y. (1990). Learning, working and imagining: Twelve studies in activity theory. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.</p><p>Engestrm Y (1987) Learning by Expanding: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research Orienta-Konsultit Helsink</p><p>Eraut, M. (1995), Developing professional knowledge within a client-centered orientation. In T.Gusky, & M. Huberman (Eds), Professional development in education (pp. 227-252). New York: Teachers College Press.</p><p>Faizah A Majid, B. (2011).School Based Assessment in Malaysia School: The Concern of English Teachers. Retrieved from education.uitm.edu.my/v1/images/stories/ publication/faizah/article7.pdf</p><p>Fang, Z. (1996). A review of research on teacher beliefs and practice. Educational Research, 38(1), 47-65.</p><p>Fawang-Nemser, S. & Remillard, J. (1996). Perspectives on learning to teach. In F. Murray (Ed. ), Teacher Educators' Handbook: Building a Knowledge-base, for the Preparation of Teachers (pp. 63-91). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.</p><p>Fisher, R., Lewis, M. (1999). "Anticipation or Trepidation? Teachers' Views on the Literacy Hour." Literacy 33(1): 23-28.</p><p>Flores, A. M. (2005). "Teachers' Views on Recent Curriculum Changes: Tensions and Challenges." The Curriculum Journal 16(3): 401-413.</p><p>Foss, D. & Kleinsasser, R. (1996). Preservice elementary teachers' views of pedagogical and mathematical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education 12(4), 429-442.</p><p>Freeman, D. (1992). Language teacher education, emerging discourse, and change in classroom practice. In J. Flowerdew, M. Brock & S. Hsia (Eds. ), Perspectives' on Language Teacher Education (pp. 1-2 1). Hong Kong: Hong Kong City Polytechnic.</p><p>Fullan, M. (2006), Undestanding change. In Fullan (Ed.), Educational leadership (2nd ed.),(pp, 169-183) San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</p><p>Fullan, M. (2015), The new meaning of educational change (5th ed.) New York:Teacher College Press</p><p>Fullan, M. (2005). The Meaning of Educational Change: A Quarter of a. In A. Lieberman, The Roots of Educational Change (pp. 202-216). Netherlands: Springer.</p><p>Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a Culture of Change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.</p><p>Fullan, M. (1999), Change forces: The sequel, London: Falmer Press.</p><p>Fullan, M. (1993). Change Forces: Probing the Depths of Educational Reform. London: Falmer Press.</p><p>Fullan, M. (1992). Successful School Improvement. Buckingham: Open University Press</p><p>Gang, W. (1996), Educational assessment in China, Assessment in Education Principles, Policy and Practices 3(1), 75-88</p><p>Gengatharan, K., & Rahmat, A. (2019). Keperluan modul pentaksiran pendidikan kesihatan untuk guru tahap satu dalam pelaksanaan pentaksiran bilik darjah. Jurnal Sains Sukan & Pendidikan Jasmani, 8(2), 19-27.</p><p>Gerstner, L.V. (2004). Preface. In Teaching at risk A call to action (pp.9-12), http://www.theteachingcommision.org.</p><p>Gersten, R., & Dmino, J. (2001), The realities of translating research into classroom practice. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16(2), 120-130</p><p>Ghazali, N. H. M. (2015). An evaluation of the implementation of the school-based assessment system in Malaysia (Doctoral dissertation, University of Southampton).</p><p>Ghazali, N. H. C. M. (2017). The implementation of School-Based Assessment System in Malaysia: A study of teacher perceptions. Geografia-Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 12(9). John, M. (2018). Assessment reform in Malaysia: policy into practice in primary schools (Doctoral dissertation, University of Stirling).</p><p>Glesne, C., & Peshkin, A. (1992). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction. White Plains, NY: Longman.</p><p>Goodson, I. (2003) Professional Knowledge, Professional Lives, Maidenhead: Open University Press.</p><p>Gregoire, M. (2003). Is it a challenge or a threat? A dual-process model of teachers' cognition and appraisal processes during conceptual change. EJiu utional Psychology Review, 15(2), 147-179.</p><p>Guskey, T. R. (2002), Professional development and teacher change, Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3-4), 381-391.</p><p>Gurnam Kaur Sidhu, Chan Yuen Fook, Zainab Mohd Noor, Teoh Chee Yong & Norshiha Saidin.(2007). Laporan Mesyuarat Perlaksanaan Penyelidikan Tentang Pentaksiran Ujian Lisan Berasaskan Sekolah Bahasa Inggeris. Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia.</p><p>Gurr, D., Drysdale, L. & Mulford, B. 2005. Successful principalship: Australian case studies. Journal of Educational Administration, 43(6):539551.</p><p>Hakkinen, H., & Korpela, M. (2006). A participatory assessment of IS integration needs in maternity clinics using activity theory, International Journal of Medical Informatics</p><p>Halsz, G. (2002). Educational Change and Social Transition in Hungary. National Institute of Public Education , 1-13.</p><p>Halinger, P. And Heck, R.H. (2010), Reassessing the principals role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research 1980-1995, Educational Administration Quartely, Vol 32 No 1 pp. 5-44</p><p>Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (2001). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.</p><p>Hall, V., Mackay, H. & Morgan, C. 1986. Head Teachers at Work. England : Open University</p><p>Hammersley, M. (2002) Educational Research, Policymaking and Practice, London, Paul Chapman</p><p>Hargreaves, D. and Hopkins, D., (1991), The Empowered School. Trowbridge, Cassell.</p><p>Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M.( 1998). Whats worth fighting for in education. Buckingham and Philadelphia: Open University Press</p><p>Hargreaves, E. (2005). Assessment for learning? Thinking outside the (black) box. Cambridge Journal of Education, 35(2), 213-224.</p><p>Hariri, H., Ridwan, & Karwan, D. H. (2018). Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah dan Pengaruhnya terhadap Kinerja Guru dalam Mendongkrak Prestasi Siswa[Principal Leadership and Its Effect on Teacher Performance in Boosting Student Achievement].Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.</p><p>Harris, B. (2001). "Facing the Challenges of Education Reform in Hong Kong: An Experiential Approach to Teacher Development." Pastoral Care in Education 19(2): 21-31.</p><p>Hasan, H. (1998). Activity Theory: a Basis for the Contextual study of Information Systems in Organisations. In H. Hasan, E. Gould & P. N. Hyland (Eds.), Information</p><p>Hayward, L., Priestley, M. & Young, M. (2004) Ruffling the calm of the ocean floor: merging practice, policy and research in assessment in Scotland, Oxford Review of Education, 30(3), 397-416.</p><p>Heifetz, R. A., Linsky, M., & Grashow, A. (2009). The practice of adaptive leadership: Tools and tactics for changing your organization and the world. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press.</p><p>Helsby G. (1999). Changing teachers work, Buckingham: Open University Press.</p><p>Helsby, G. & McCulloch, G. (1997) Introduction: teachers and the national curriculum, in G. Helsby & G. McCulloch (Eds) Teachers and the National Curriculum (London, Cassell).</p><p>Hersey, P. & Blanchard, K. H. 1993. Management of Organisational Behaviour: Utilizing Human Resources. 6th edition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.</p><p>Hess, F., Maranto, R., Scott, M., Ferraiolo, K. G. (2002). "In the Storm's Eye: How Race, Experience, and Exposure Shape Arizona Teachers' Attitudes toward School Choice." Teachers College Record 104(8): 1568-1590.</p><p>Hinde ER (2004). School Culture and Change: an examination of the effects of school culture on the process of change. Arizona State University West. Availabale at http://usca.edu/essays/vol122004/hinde.pdf. Accessed on 13 November 2009</p><p>Hishamuddin Tun Hussien. 2005. Minister of Education Dato Sri Hishamuddin Tun Hussien. Opening address at the APEC colloquium the future of educational assessment: East meets West. Kuala Lumpur, 13-15 September.</p><p>Hollingsworth, S. (1989). Prior beliefs and cognitive change in learning to teach. American Educational Research Association, 26, 160-190.</p><p>Holt-Reynolds, D. (1992). Personal history-based beliefs as relevant prior knowledge in course work. American Educational Research Journal, 29(2), 325-349.</p><p>House, E. & McQuillan, P.J. (1998) Three perspectives on school reform, in A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan & D. Hopkins (Eds), The 34 International Handbook of Educational Change, Part One (London, Kluwer Academic Publishers).</p><p>Howes, A., Booth, T, Dyson, A. & Frankham, J. (2005) Teacher learning and the development of inclusive practices and policies: framing the context, Research Papers in Education, 20(2), 133-48.</p><p>Hoy, W. K. & Miskel, C. G. 2001. Educational Administration: Theory, Research and Practice. 6th edition. New York: McGraw Hill.</p><p>Hursh, D. (2007). Introduction. Policy Futures in Education, 5(2), 115118.</p><p>Ismail, S. A. (2014). Factors affecting the implementation of information literacy education in Malaysian primary schools.</p><p>Jaques, S. & Clement, S. 1991. Executive Leadership: A Practical Guide to Managing Complexity. Massachusetts: Basil Blackwell Inc.</p><p>John, M. (2018). Assessment reform in Malaysia: policy into practice in primary schools (Doctoral dissertation, University of Stirling).</p><p>Johnson, K. E. (1992). The instructional design of preservice ESL teachers. In J. Flowerdew, M. Brock & H. Hsia (Eds. ), Perspectives on Second Language Teach'r Development (pp. 115-134). Hong Kong: Hong Kong City Polytechnic.</p><p>Johnson, K. E. (1994). The emerging beliefs and instructional practices of preservice ESL teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 10(4), 439-452.</p><p>Joia, L. A. (2002). Analysing a web-based e-commerce learning community: A case study in Brazil. Internet Research, 12, 305-317.</p><p>Julianne C. Turner, Andrea Christensen & Debra K. Meyer. (2009). Teachers Beliefs about Student Learning and Motivation. Springer International Handbooks of Education, Vol. 21, 5, 361-371.</p><p>Kagan, D. (1992). Implications of research on teacher beliefs. Educational Psychologist, 27(1), 65-90.</p><p>Karavas-Doukas E. 1996. 'Using attitude scales to investigate teachers attitudes to the communicative approach'. ELT Journal 50/3: 187-198.</p><p>Kelman, J., (1958). Compliance, identification, and internalization three processes of attitude change. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2, 51-60.</p><p>Kennedy M. (1991). A research agenda on teacher learning. East Lansing: National Centre for Research on Teacher Learning.</p><p>Kirk, D., MacDonald, D. (2001). "Teacher Voice and Ownership of Curriculum Change." Journal of Curriculum Studies V33(5): 551-567.</p><p>Korthagen, F. (2004). In search of the essence of a good teacher: Towards a more holistic approach in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(l), 77-97.</p><p>Korpela, M., Mursu, A., & Soriyan, H. A. (2002). Information Systems Development as an Activity. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 11, pp. 111-128.</p><p>Krech, D., & Crutchfield, R.S. (1948). Theory and problems of social psychology. New York: MacGraw-Hill</p><p>KulaIRIZran, P. (2010, August 1). More concerns over exams. The Star.</p><p>Kuutti, K. (1996). Activity Theory as a Potential Framework for Human-Computer Interaction Research. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 17-44). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.</p><p>Kynigos, C., & Argyris, M. (2004). Teacher beliefs and practices formed during an innovation with computer-basedexploratory mathematics in the classroom. Teachers and Teaching, 10 (3), 247-273.</p><p>LeCompte, M.D. and Preissle, J. with Tesch, R. (1993) Ethnography and Qualitative Design in Educational Research, 2nd edition, Chicago: Academic Press</p><p>Lee, H. Y. (2020). Strategi Pelaksanaan PBS Guru-Guru Hilir Perak dan Bagan Datuk Berhubung Kait dengan Estetik. Journal of Applied Arts, 2(1), 78-87.</p><p>Lee, M. N. (1999). Education in Malaysia: Towards Vision 2020. School Effectiveness and School Improvement , 10 (1), 198698.</p><p>Lee, M.N.N., (2002), Educational Change In Malaysia, School of Educational Studies, USM, Penang, Malaysia.</p><p>Leithwood. K., Day, C., Sammons, P., Harris, A. and Hopkins, D. (2006) Seven strong claims about successful school leadership, National College for School Leadership, Nottingham.</p><p>Leonard, P. E. (1999) Understanding the dimensions of school culture: value orientations and value conflicts. Journal of Educational Administration and Foundations, 13(2), 2753.</p><p>Levin, B. (1998). An epidemic of education policy: (what) can we learn from each other? Comparative Education , 34 (2), 131-141.</p><p>Levin, B. (2008). How to change 5000 schools: A practical and positive approach for leading change at every level. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Educational Press.</p><p>Levin, B., & Fullan, M. (2008). Learning about system renewal. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 36(2), 289-303.</p><p>Lewin, K. (1951) Field theory in social science; selected theoretical papers. D. Cartwright (ed.). New York: Harper & Row.</p><p>Liaw, S.-S., Huang, H.-M., & Chen, G.-D. (2007). An activity-theoretical approach to investigate learners' factors toward e-learning systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, p. 1906-1920.</p><p>Lieberman, A., & Miller, L. (1999). Teachers: Transforming their world and their work. New (in complete)</p><p>Lim, D.(1999). Quality assurance in higher education in developing countries. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24(4), pp. 37990.</p><p>Lim, C.S., & Chew, C.M. (2019). Implementation of school-based assessment (SBA) in Malaysian primary mathematics curriculum: Issues and challenges. School Mathematics Curricula, 189-205.</p><p>Lincoln, Y. S. and Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.</p><p>Little, Judith Warren. "Norms of Collegiality and Experimentation: Workplace Conditions of School Success." AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL 19 (1982): 325-340. EJ 275 511</p><p>Litwin, G. H. & Stringer, R. A. 1968. Motivation and Organisational Climate. Boston: Harvard University Press.</p><p>Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.</p><p>Lotzkar, M., & Bottorff, J. (2001). An observational study of the development of a nursepatient relationship. Clinical Nursing Research, 10, 275-294.</p><p>Louden, W. (1991). Understanding teaching. NY: Teachers College Press. York: Teachers College Press.</p><p>MacBeath, J. and Dempster, N. (2009) [Eds] Connecting Leadership and Learning, London, Routledge.</p><p>MacPhail, A. (2007). "Teachers' Views on the Construction, Management and Delivery Ofan Externally Prescribed Physical Education Curriculum: Higher Grade Physical Education." Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy 12(1): 43 - 60.</p><p>Makarova E ( 2013 ) Teachers' Acculturation Attitudes and Their Classroom Management: An Empirical Study among Fifth-Grade Primary School Teachers in Switzerland Europe Educational Research Journal</p><p>Mansur, U., & Samad, A. A. (2015). Views of educators: Assessment preference in reading skills for Malaysia primary school. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 5(2).</p><p>Marlin Abdul Karim. (2002). Pentaksiran berasaskan sekolah: pentaksiran untuk pembelajaran. Prosiding Persidangan Kebangsaan Penilaian Kemajuan Berasaskan Penilaian Kemajuan Berasaskan Sekolah. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. p.10-15.</p><p>Marlin Abd. Karim, & Shahril Mohd. Karib. (2003). High stakes assessment in Malaysia:Washback in the English Language classroom. In Koleksi kertas kerja Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia (Collected working papers of the Malaysian Examination Council). Kuala Lumpur: MEC.</p><p>Marriage, T.V., & Garmon, M.A. (2003), A case of educational change: Improving student achievement through a school-university partnership. Remedial and Special Education, 24(4), 215-234</p><p>Maxwell, J. C. 1999. The 21 Indispensable Qualities of a Leader: Becoming the Person Others would want to Follow. Tennessee: Thomas Nelson Publishers.</p><p>Mazzarella, J. A. & Smith, S. C. 1989. Leadership Styles in School Leadership: Handbook for Excellence, edited by Stuart C., Smith & Philip. Piele. USA: ERIC Clearing House on Education Management: 28-51.</p><p>McGilchrist, B., Mortimore, P., Savage, J. and Beresford, C, (1997), Development Planning in Primary Schools, Chapter 20 in Preedy, M., Glatter, R. and Levacic, R., Educational Management - Strategy. Quality and Resources. Bristol, Pa, Open University Press.</p><p>McLaughlin, M.W. (1998) Listening and learning from the field: tales of policy implementation and situated practice, in A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan & D. Hopkins (Eds), The International Handbook of Educational Change, Part One (London, Kluwer Academic Publishers).</p><p>McMillan H.J. (2007). Formative Classroom Assessment: The Key to Improving Student Achievement: McMillan H.J. (Editor) : Teacher College Press</p><p>Merriam, S.B 1998. Qualitative Research and Case Studies Applications in education. San Francisco. Jessey Bass Publications.</p><p>Messick, S. (1994). The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance assessments. Educational Researcher, 23, 13-23.</p><p>Miles, M., (1998) Finding Keys to School Change: A 40-Yeat Odyssey. Hargreaves, A., Liebermann, A., Fullan, M., And Hopkins, D. International Handbook of Educational Change.: Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer</p><p>Miller, K, Edwards, R, Priestley, M (2010) Levels and equivalence in credit and qualifications frameworks: Contrasting the prescribed and enacted curriculum in school and college. Research Papers in Education 25: pp. 225-243</p><p>M., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K., & Spiers, J. (2002). Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 1e19.</p><p>Mohamad , M. (1991). The way forward: Vision 2020. www.epu.jpm.my, accessed on April 28, 2008.</p><p>Ministry of Education Malaysia [MOE]. (2017). Dasar pendidikan kebangsaan [National education policy] (4th ed). Putrajaya: Ministry of Education Malaysia.</p><p>Ministry of Education Malaysia [MOE]. (2017). Penataran pentaksiran sekolah (PS)/Pentaksiran bilik darjah (PBD) [Upgrading school assessment (PS)/Classroom assessment (PBS)]. Putrajaya: Ministry of Education Malaysia.</p><p>Minty, S. & Priestley, M. (2012) Developing Curriculum for Excellence in Highland Schools: A report on the qualitative findings for the Highland Council and the Scottish Government. Stirling: University of Stirling.</p><p>Moktar, S. N. A., Hanapi, Z., Kiong, T. T., Mohamed, S., & Rus, R. C. (2018). Kesediaan, Penerimaan Dan Pengoperasian Guru Reka Bentuk dan Teknologi Terhadap Amalan dalam Pentaksiran Berasaskan Sekolah. Sains Humanika, 10(3-3).</p><p>Morse, J. M. (1995). The significance of saturation. Qualitative Health Research, 5, 147e149. Morse, J.</p><p>Morse, J. M., Stern, P. N., Corbin, J., Bowers, B., Charmaz, K., & Clarke, A. E. (2009). Developing grounded theory: The second generation. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage</p><p>Mudin, V. F. (2019). An investigation into English teachers' understandings and practices of formative assessment in the Malaysian primary ESL classroom: three case studies (Doctoral dissertation, University of East Anglia).</p><p>Mumbay, H. (1984) A qualitative approach to the teachers belief. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21, pp.27-38</p><p>Mundy, H. (1984). A qualitative study of teachers' belief and principles. Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 21, 27-38.</p><p>Murphy, K. & Mason, L. (2006). Changing knowledge and beliefs. In P. Alexander & P. Winne (Eds. ), Handbook of Educational Psychology (2nd ed., pp. 305-324). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.</p><p>Musa Mohammad. (2003, May 8). Malaysian education system to be less exam oriented. New Straits Times.</p><p>Mustapa, M. A. S., Ibrahim, M., & Yusoff, A. (2015). Engaging vocational college students through blendedlearning: Improving class attendance and participation.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 204,127135</p><p>Murphy, K. & Mason, L. (2006). Changing knowledge and beliefs. In P. Alexander & P. Winne (Eds. ), Handbook of Educational Psychology (2nd ed., pp. 305-324). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.</p><p>OBrien, J., & Christie, F. (2008), A role for universities in the induction of teachers? A Scottish case study. Professional Development in Education, 34(2), 147-163.</p><p>Ong, S. (2010). Assessment profile of Malaysia: high-stakes external examinations dominate. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice , 17 (1), 91 103.</p><p>Osborn, M., Croll, P., Broadfoot, P., Pollard, A., McNess, E. & Triggs, P. (1997). Policy into practice and practice into policy: Creative mediation in the primary classroom, in G. Helsby & G. McCulloch (eds.), Teachers and the national curriculum (pp. 52-65), London: Cassell.</p><p>Owens, R. G. 1991. Organisational Behaviour in Education. 4th edition. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.</p><p>Pajares, F. (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A review of the literature. Reading& writing Quarterly, 19 (2), 139-158.</p><p>Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers beliefs and educational research: cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307332.</p><p>Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc</p><p>Pejza, J.P. (1985, April ). The Catholic school principal: A different kind of leader. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Catholic Educational Association, St. Louis, MO.</p><p>Peterson, K. and Deal T. (1998). How leaders influence the culture of schools. Educational Leadership 56 (1), 28-30.</p><p>Perkins, D. (1992), Smart schools. NY: The Free Press.</p><p>Phipps, S. & S. Borg. (2009). Exploring tensions between teachers" grammar teaching beliefs and practices. System 37. 3, 380 390.</p><p>Pickering, A. (2005). Harnessing influences for change: Some implications from research for teacher educators. In L. Clandfield (Ed.), Affect and Self-esteem in Teacher Education (pp. 17-26). Whitstable, Kent: IATEFL.</p><p>Pont, B., Nusche, D. & Moorman, H. (2008) Improving School Leadership, Volume 1: Policy and Practice, OECD Publishing.</p><p>Posner, G., Strike, K., Hewson, P. & Gertzog, W. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific concept: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Scimcc Education, 66, 211-227.</p><p>Priestley, M. (2012). Curriculum for Excellence: transformational change or business as usual? Interaces, 22[8], 178-195. (article reproduced from SER, 42[1])</p><p>Priestley, M. (2011). Whatever happened to curriculum theory? Critical realism and curriculum change, Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 19(2): 221-238.</p><p>Priestley, M. (2010). Schools, teachers, and curriculum change: A balancing act? Journal of Educational Change .</p><p>Priestley, M. (2005). Making the most of the Curriculum Review: some reflections on supporting and sustaining change in schools. Scottish Educational Review , 37 (1), 2938.</p><p>Priestley, M. & Sime, D. (2005). Formative assessment for all: a whole-school approach to pedagogic change. The Curriculum Journal , 16 (4), 475-492.</p><p>Priestley, M. & Biesta, G. J. J. (Eds.) (2013). Reinventing the Curriculum: New Trends in Curriculum Policy and Practice. London: Bloomsbury Academic</p><p>Priestley, M., Robinson, S. & Biesta, G. J. J. (2012). Teacher Agency, Performativity and Curriculum Change: Reinventing the Teacher in the Scottish Curriculum for Excellence? In B. Jeffrey & G. Troman (Eds.),Performativity across UK education: ethnographic cases of its effects, agency and reconstructions. Painswick: E&E Publishing.</p><p>Quicke, J. (2003). "Educating the Pupil Voice." Support for Learning 18(2): 51-57.</p><p>Quinn, D. M. (2002). The impact of principal leadership behaviors on instructional practice and student engagement. Journal of Educational Administration, 40(4/5), 20.</p><p>Kiahi. 2008. An Indonesian model of successful school leadership. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(4):481-496.</p><p>Reeves, J. (2008). Between a rock and a hard place? Curriculum for excellence and the Quality initiative in Scottish schools. Scottish Educational Review, 40(2), 6-16.</p><p>Reeves, C. J. & Boreham, N. (2006) Whats in a vision? Introducing an organisational learning strategy in aLocal Authoritys education service, Oxford Review of Education, 32 (4), 467-486.</p><p>Resnick, L. B. & Resnick, D. P. (1991). Assessing the thinking curriculum:new tools for educational reform, in B.R. Giggord & M. C. OConner (Eds.) Changging Assessments: alternative views of aptitude, achievement and instruction, pp. 37-75 (Boston,MA, Kluwer).</p><p>Ribbins, P. 2001. Leadership Effects and the Effectiveness and Improvement of Schools, in Leadership for Quality Schooling: International Perspectives, edited by KamCheung Wong & Evers C. W. London: Routledge Falmer</p><p>Richards, J. (1998). Beyond Training. Cambridge: CUP.</p><p>Richards, J. (1996). Teacher maxims in language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 30(2), 281-296.</p><p>Richards, J., Gallo, P. & Renandya, W. (2001). Exploring teachers' beliefs and the processes of change. PAC Journal, 1(1), 41-58.</p><p>Richardson, V. (1990). The evolution of reflective teaching and teacher education. In R. T. Clift, W. R. Houston, & M. C. Pugach (Eds.), Encouraging reflective practice in education: An analysis of issues and programs. (pp. 3-19). New York: Teachers College Press.</p><p>Richardson, V., Anders, P., Tidwell, D., & Lloyd, C. (1991). The Relationship Between Teachers' Beliefs and Practices in Reading Comprehension Instruction. American Educational Research Journal , 28 (3), 559-586.</p><p>Riley, K. & Docking, J. (2004). "Voice of Disaffected Pupils: Implications for Policy and Practice." British Journal of Educational Studies 52(2):166-179.</p><p>Roberts, J. (1999). Personal construct psychology as a framework for research into teacher and learner thinking. Language Teaching Research, 3(2), 117-144.</p><p>Rose, R., Shevlin, M. (2004). "Encouraging Voices: Listening to Young People Who Have Been Marginalised." Support for Learning 19(4): 155-161.</p><p>Sarason, S. (1982), The culture of the school and the problem of change (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon</p><p>Sarason, S. B. (1990). The predictable failure of educational reform. Oxford: Jossey-Bass Publishers.</p><p>Sashkin, M. & Sashkin, M. 2003. Leadership That Matters. San Francisco: Berrettkoehler Publishers Inc.</p><p>Saunders, M, Lewis, P. & Thornhill, A. (2007) Research Methods for Business Students (4th edition) Harlow: Prentice Hall.</p><p>Savasci-Acikalin, F. (2009). Teacher beliefs and practice in science education. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 10(1 Article 12), 1-14.</p><p>Scanlon, E. & Issroff, K. (2005). Activity Theory and Higher Education: evaluating learning technologies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, p. 430.</p><p>Scheib, J. W. (2003). Role stress in the professional life of the school music teacher: A collective case study. Journal of Research in Music Education, 51,124-136.</p><p>Schermerhorn, J. R., Hunt, J. G. & Osborn, R. N. 2000 Organisational Behaviour. 7th edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc</p><p>Scriven, M, 1991, Evaluation thesaurus, 4th edition. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications</p><p>Seidman, I. E. (1991). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York: Teachers College Press.</p><p>Sendan, F. & Roberts, J. (1998). Orhan: A case study in the development of a student teacher's personal theories. Teachers and Teaching, 4,229-244.</p><p>Senge, P. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York, NY: Doubleday.</p><p>Sergiovanni, T. J. 1984. Rethinking Leadership. Illinois: Skylight Training and Publishing Inc.</p><p>Silverman, D. (2001) Interpreting qualitative data: methods for analysing talk, text and interaction. Sage Publications, London</p><p>Silverman, D. (1993), Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction. London: Sage.</p><p>So, K., & Park, N. (2020). Can Teachers Be Change Agents? A Critical Analysis of Teacher Images in School Reform Policies. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 1-10.</p><p>Spillane, J. (1999) External reform efforts and teachers initiatives to reconstruct their practice: the mediating role of teachers zones of enactment, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31(2), 143-175.</p><p>Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.</p><p>Standen, R. P. (2002). The interplay between teachers' beliefs and practices in a multi-age primary school. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.</p><p>Stiggins, R.J. 2002. Students-involved classroom assessment. 3rd Ed. Upper Saddle River New Jersey & Columbus Ohio: Merill Prentice Hall.</p><p>Strike, K. & Posner, G. (1985). A conceptual change view of learning and understanding. In L. West & A. Pines (Eds.), Cognitive Structure and Cognitic-Change (pp. 211-232). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.</p><p>Supovitz, J. A. (2008). Implementation as iterative refraction, in J.A. Supovitz & E.H. Weinbaum (Eds.), The implementation gap: Understanding reform in high schools (pp. 151-172). New York: Teachers College Press.</p><p>Swann, J. & Brown, S. (1997) The implementation of a national curriculum and teachers' classroom thinking, Research papers in Education: Policy and Practice, 12(1), 91-114</p><p>Tobin, K., & McRobbie, C. J. (1996). Cultural myths as constraints to the enacted science curriculum. Science Education, 80, 223241.</p><p>Tong, Joy Kooi-Chin and Bryan Turner. 2008. Women, piety and practice: A study of women and religious practice in Malaysia in Contemporary Islam 2:41-59.</p><p>Torrance, H. (1997). Assessment, accountability, and standards: Using assessment to control the reform of schooling. In: Halsey, AH, Lauder, H, Brown, P, Wells, AS eds. Education: Culture, economy, society. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp. 320-331</p><p>Trubowitz, S. (2001). Likely foes of large-scale educational change. The Education Digest, 66(6), 11-16.</p><p>Trumbull, E., & Lash, A. (2013). Understanding formative assessment. Insights form learning theory and measurement theory. San Francisco: WestEd, 1-20.</p><p>Tyack, D. and Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward Utopia. A century of public school reform (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).</p><p>Van Driel, J. H., Beijard, D., & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 137158.</p><p>Vecchiotti, R. (2018). Contemporary leadership: The perspective of a practitioner. Journal of Leadership Studies, 12(2), 40-45.</p><p>Vidyakala, K. (2020). A Conceptual Study on Managerial Grid Approach. Aut Aut Research Journal, 11, 117-122.</p><p>Wall, K., Higgins, S., Smith, H. (2005). "'the Visual Helps Me Understand the Complicated Things': Pupil Views of Teaching and Learning with Interactive Whiteboards." British Journal of Educational Technology 36(5): 851-867.</p><p>Wasley, P. A. (1991). Teachers who lead: The rhetoric of reform and the realities of practice. New York: Teachers College Press.</p><p>Whitty, G., Power, S. & Halpin, D. (1998) Devolution and Choice in Education: The School, the State and the Market (Buckingham, Open University Press).</p><p>Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative Assessment. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.</p><p>Wouldiam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 1 (1), 1-40.</p><p>Wiliam, D., & Leahy, S. (2007). A theoretical foundation for formative assessment. In H. McMillan (Ed.), Formative assessment classroom: Theory into practice (pp. 29 42). NY: Teachers College Press.</p><p>Wiliam, D., Lee, C., Harrison, C. & Black, P. (2004) Teachers developing assessment for learning: impact on student achievement. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 11(1), 49-65. In Black, P., &</p><p>Wouldiams, M. & Burden, R. (1997). Psychology for Language Teachers. Cambridge: CUP.</p><p>Wilkins, C. (2011). Professionalism and the post-performative teacher: New teachers reflect on autonomy and accountability in the English school system. Professional Development in Education, 37, 389-409.</p><p>Witziers, B., Bosker, R. J. & Kruger, M. L. 2003. Educational Leadership and Student Achievement: The Elusive Search for an Association. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3):398-425.</p><p>Wolcott, H. (1990) On Seeking and RejectingValidity in Qualitative Research, in E. Eisner and A. Peshkin (eds) Qualitative Inquiry in Education: The Continuing Debate, pp. 12152. New York: Teachers College Press.</p><p>Woods, D. (1996). Teacher Cognition in Language Teaching. Cambridge: CUP.</p><p>Woolfolk Hoy, A., Davis, H., & Pape, S. (2006). Teachers' knowledge, beliefs, and thinking. In P. A. Alexander & P. H, Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 715737.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.</p><p>Wubbels, T. & Poppleton, P. (1999) Knowledge about change and its effects on teachers. In M. Lang, J. Olson, H. Hansen & W. Bunder (eds.), Changing Schools/Changing Practices: perspectives on educational reform and teacher professionalism (Louvain, Garant)</p><p>Yarrick, R., Park, H., & Nugent, J. (1997). Struggling to promote deeply rooted change: The filtering effect of teachers beliefs on understanding transformational views of teaching science. Science Education, 81, 137159.</p><p>Yamagata-Lynch, L. C. (2010). Activity systems analysis methods: Understanding complex learning environments. New York: Springer.</p><p>Yamazumi, K., Oshima, J., Itoh, D., & Shimada, M. (2007). Collaborative and Networked Expertise: An Activity-theoretical Study of New Forms of Pre-service Teachers Expansive Learning Kansai: Center for Human Activity Theory, Kansai University</p><p>Yerrick, R., Parke, H., & Nugent, J. (1997). Struggling to promote deep rooted change: The filtering effect of teachers beliefs on understanding transformational views of teaching science. Science Education, 81, 137159.</p><p>Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.</p><p>Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.</p><p>Yuh, T. J., & Kenayathulla, H. B. (2020). Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah dan prestasi murid Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan Cina di Hulu Langat, Selangor. JuPiDi: Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 7(3), 70-90.</p><p>Zaltman, G., Duncan, R., & Holbek, J. (1973). Innovations and organizations. New York: Wiley.</p><p>Zamri, S. N. A. S. (2016). Problem-solving skills among Malaysian students. In L. M. Thien., A. R. Nordin, J. P. Keeves, & I. G. N. Darmawan (Eds.), what can PISA 2012 data tell us? Performance and challenges in five participating Southeast Asian countries (pp. 107-121). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publisher.</p><p>Zhang, Z., & Burry-Stock, J. (2003). Classroom assessment practices and teachers self-perceived assessment skills. Applied Measurement in Education, 16(4), 323-342. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15324818AME1604_4</p><p>Zurita, G., & Nussbaum, M. (2007). A conceptual framework based on Activity Theory for mobile CSCL. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38, p. 211.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p>