Pembangunan modul FZ-STEM dalam topik Daya dan Gerakan serta keberkesanannya terhadap kemahiran abad ke-21 dan KBAT

Pembangunan modul FZ-STEM dalam topik Daya dan Gerakan serta keberkesanannya terhadap kemahiran abad ke-21 dan KBAT

<p>Kajian ini bertujuan untuk membangunkan Modul FZ-STEM dalam topik Daya dan</p><p>Gerakan serta mengkaji keberkesanannya terhadap kemahiran abad ke-21 (KA-21)</p><p>dan kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi (KBAT). Modul FZ-STEM ialah...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mohd Taufek Harun
Format: thesis
Language:zsm
Published: 2022
Subjects:
LB Theory and practice of education
Online Access:https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=9527
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:9527
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
collection UPSI Digital Repository
language zsm
topic LB Theory and practice of education
spellingShingle LB Theory and practice of education
Mohd Taufek Harun
Pembangunan modul FZ-STEM dalam topik Daya dan Gerakan serta keberkesanannya terhadap kemahiran abad ke-21 dan KBAT
description <p>Kajian ini bertujuan untuk membangunkan Modul FZ-STEM dalam topik Daya dan</p><p>Gerakan serta mengkaji keberkesanannya terhadap kemahiran abad ke-21 (KA-21)</p><p>dan kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi (KBAT). Modul FZ-STEM ialah modul</p><p>pembelajaran berasaskan projek yang diintegrasikan dengan konsep Sains, Teknologi,</p><p>Kejuruteraan, dan Matematik (STEM). Kajian ini menggunakan Pendekatan Reka</p><p>bentuk dan Pembangunan (DDR) bagi membangunkan modul serta kaedah kuasi</p><p>eksperimen bagi menilai keberkesanan modul. Modul FZ-STEM yang dibangunkan</p><p>memperoleh kesahan kandungan yang baik dengan nilai min pekali kesahan</p><p>kandungan sebanyak 0.95 dan kebolehpercayaan yang sangat baik dengan nilai alfa</p><p>Cronbach sebanyak 0.857. Kajian keberkesanan modul FZ-STEM terhadap KA-21</p><p>dan KBAT dijalankan di sebuah sekolah menengah di Daerah Kerian, Perak. Kajian</p><p>dijalankan selama 8 minggu melibatkan responden seramai 60 orang murid yang</p><p>dipilih secara pensampelan rawak kelompok dan dibahagikan kepada dua kumpulan,</p><p>iaitu 30 orang dalam kumpulan rawatan dan 30 orang lagi dalam kumpulan kawalan.</p><p>Kumpulan rawatan mengikuti pengajaran dan pembelajaran (PdP) dengan</p><p>menggunakan Modul FZ-STEM manakala kumpulan kawalan mengikuti PdP secara</p><p>konvensional. Praujian dan pascaujian KA-21 serta KBAT diberikan kepada keduadua</p><p>kumpulan tersebut. Dari segi dapatan ujian-t sampel berpasangan, didapati</p><p>kumpulan rawatan menunjukkan perbezaan yang ketara antara skor min praujian</p><p>dengan pascaujian KBAT dengan nilai (t(29)=-20.270, p=0.000). Malahan, dapatan</p><p>pascaujian KBAT bagi kumpulan rawatan menunjukkan peningkatan yang lebih baik</p><p>berbanding dengan kumpulan kawalan (t(45.377)=9.378, p=0.000). Kesimpulannya,</p><p>penggunaan Modul FZ-STEM memberikan kesan yang ketara terhadap pencapaian</p><p>KBAT dalam kalangan murid. Kajian ini memberikan implikasi bahawa, pendekatan</p><p>Pembelajaran Berasaskan Projek STEM yang digunakan dalam Modul FZ-STEM</p><p>boleh digunakan sebagai salah satu strategi PdP oleh guru bagi menggalakkan</p><p>pembelajaran berpusatkan murid serta pembelajaran yang lebih aktif, sekaligus</p><p>mempertingkat pencapaian murid dalam mata pelajaran Fizik dengan cara yang lebih</p><p>mantap.</p>
format thesis
qualification_name
qualification_level Master's degree
author Mohd Taufek Harun
author_facet Mohd Taufek Harun
author_sort Mohd Taufek Harun
title Pembangunan modul FZ-STEM dalam topik Daya dan Gerakan serta keberkesanannya terhadap kemahiran abad ke-21 dan KBAT
title_short Pembangunan modul FZ-STEM dalam topik Daya dan Gerakan serta keberkesanannya terhadap kemahiran abad ke-21 dan KBAT
title_full Pembangunan modul FZ-STEM dalam topik Daya dan Gerakan serta keberkesanannya terhadap kemahiran abad ke-21 dan KBAT
title_fullStr Pembangunan modul FZ-STEM dalam topik Daya dan Gerakan serta keberkesanannya terhadap kemahiran abad ke-21 dan KBAT
title_full_unstemmed Pembangunan modul FZ-STEM dalam topik Daya dan Gerakan serta keberkesanannya terhadap kemahiran abad ke-21 dan KBAT
title_sort pembangunan modul fz-stem dalam topik daya dan gerakan serta keberkesanannya terhadap kemahiran abad ke-21 dan kbat
granting_institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
granting_department Fakulti Sains dan Matematik
publishDate 2022
url https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=9527
_version_ 1783730271314509824
spelling oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:95272023-10-05 Pembangunan modul FZ-STEM dalam topik Daya dan Gerakan serta keberkesanannya terhadap kemahiran abad ke-21 dan KBAT 2022 Mohd Taufek Harun LB Theory and practice of education <p>Kajian ini bertujuan untuk membangunkan Modul FZ-STEM dalam topik Daya dan</p><p>Gerakan serta mengkaji keberkesanannya terhadap kemahiran abad ke-21 (KA-21)</p><p>dan kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi (KBAT). Modul FZ-STEM ialah modul</p><p>pembelajaran berasaskan projek yang diintegrasikan dengan konsep Sains, Teknologi,</p><p>Kejuruteraan, dan Matematik (STEM). Kajian ini menggunakan Pendekatan Reka</p><p>bentuk dan Pembangunan (DDR) bagi membangunkan modul serta kaedah kuasi</p><p>eksperimen bagi menilai keberkesanan modul. Modul FZ-STEM yang dibangunkan</p><p>memperoleh kesahan kandungan yang baik dengan nilai min pekali kesahan</p><p>kandungan sebanyak 0.95 dan kebolehpercayaan yang sangat baik dengan nilai alfa</p><p>Cronbach sebanyak 0.857. Kajian keberkesanan modul FZ-STEM terhadap KA-21</p><p>dan KBAT dijalankan di sebuah sekolah menengah di Daerah Kerian, Perak. Kajian</p><p>dijalankan selama 8 minggu melibatkan responden seramai 60 orang murid yang</p><p>dipilih secara pensampelan rawak kelompok dan dibahagikan kepada dua kumpulan,</p><p>iaitu 30 orang dalam kumpulan rawatan dan 30 orang lagi dalam kumpulan kawalan.</p><p>Kumpulan rawatan mengikuti pengajaran dan pembelajaran (PdP) dengan</p><p>menggunakan Modul FZ-STEM manakala kumpulan kawalan mengikuti PdP secara</p><p>konvensional. Praujian dan pascaujian KA-21 serta KBAT diberikan kepada keduadua</p><p>kumpulan tersebut. Dari segi dapatan ujian-t sampel berpasangan, didapati</p><p>kumpulan rawatan menunjukkan perbezaan yang ketara antara skor min praujian</p><p>dengan pascaujian KBAT dengan nilai (t(29)=-20.270, p=0.000). Malahan, dapatan</p><p>pascaujian KBAT bagi kumpulan rawatan menunjukkan peningkatan yang lebih baik</p><p>berbanding dengan kumpulan kawalan (t(45.377)=9.378, p=0.000). Kesimpulannya,</p><p>penggunaan Modul FZ-STEM memberikan kesan yang ketara terhadap pencapaian</p><p>KBAT dalam kalangan murid. Kajian ini memberikan implikasi bahawa, pendekatan</p><p>Pembelajaran Berasaskan Projek STEM yang digunakan dalam Modul FZ-STEM</p><p>boleh digunakan sebagai salah satu strategi PdP oleh guru bagi menggalakkan</p><p>pembelajaran berpusatkan murid serta pembelajaran yang lebih aktif, sekaligus</p><p>mempertingkat pencapaian murid dalam mata pelajaran Fizik dengan cara yang lebih</p><p>mantap.</p> 2022 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=9527 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=9527 text zsm closedAccess Masters Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Sains dan Matematik <p>Ahmad Adnan Mohd Shukri, Che Nidzam Che Ahmad, & Norhayati Daud. (2019). Pelaksanaan Modul Celik STEM bagi memperkasakan pemikiran kreatif murid tingkatan satu. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 4(32), 219237. doi:10.35631/ijepc.4320021.</p><p>Ahmad Khoiri. (2019). Meta Analysis Study : Effect of STEM ( Science Technology Engineering and Mathematic ) towards Achievement. 9(1), 7182.</p><p>Ahmad Tarmimi Ismail, & Shahrul Kadri Ayop. (2016). Tahap kefahaman dan salah konsep terhadap konsep daya dan gerakan dalam kalangan pelajar tingkatan empat. Jurnal Fizik Malaysia, 37(1), 0109001101.</p><p>Akhmad Darmawan. (2020). The influence of project based learning STEM model on student learning outcomes. Jurnal Pena Sains, 7(2), 113119. doi: 10.21107/jps.v7i2.64432</p><p>Aliah Ujang. (2016). Pembangunan modul pembelajaran webquest pendidikan kesihatan untuk guru pelatih murid bermasalah pembelajaran.Universiti Malaya.</p><p>Aminah Ayob. (2011). Analisisstatus pendidikan sains dan matematik, dan persediaan tenagamanusiasainsdanteknologi negara. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematik Malaysia. Diperoleh daripada http://www.myjurnal.my/filebank/published_article/26183/08.pdf</p><p>Aminah Ayob, Ong, E. T., Mazlini Adnan, Mohd Nasir Ibrahim, Jameyah Sheriff, & Noriah Mohd Ishak. (2015). Laporan STEM untuk Permata Negara, Kurikulum Pendidikan Awal Kanak-Kanak. UPSI.</p><p>Aminah Jekri, & Crispina Gregory K Han. (2020). Cabaran dalam melaksanakan pengajaran dan pembelajaran STEM di sekolah menengah. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 5(34), 8090. doi: 10.35631/ijepc.534006</p><p>Ananiadou, K., & Claro, M. (2009). 21st century skills and competences for new millennium learners in OECD countries. OECD Education Working Papers, 41, 33. doi:10.1787/218525261154</p><p>Arsaythamby Veloo, Rahimah Nor, & Rozalina Khalid. (2015). Attitude towards physics and additional mathematics achievement towards physics achievement.International Education Studies, 8(3), 3543. doi: 10.5539/ies.v8n3p35</p><p>Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2014). Elemen KBAT dalam pentaksiran (Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum (ed.)). Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p>Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2016a). Panduan pelaksanaan pengajaran dan pembelajaran berasaskan inkuiri. Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p>Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2016b). Sharing Malaysian Experience in Participation of Girls in STEM Education. 3.</p><p>Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2017). Siri bahan sumber Sains, Teknologi, Engineering dan Matematik (BSTEM), BSTEM Biologi. Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum,Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p>Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2012). Spesifikasi Kurikulum Fizik Tingkatan 4.</p><p>Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013). KBAT Inisiatif kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi di sekolah. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p>Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2014a). Elemen KBAT dalam sumber. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p>Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2014b). Kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi-Aplikasi di sekolah. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p>Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2016a). Buku penerangan Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Menengah (KSSM). Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p>Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2016b).Panduan pelaksanaan sains, teknologi, kejuruteraan dan matematik (STEM) dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p>Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2016c). Panduan pengajaran dan pembelajaran berasaskan inkuiri. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p>Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2017). Siri bahan sumber sains, teknologi, engineering dan matematik (BSTEM) Fizik. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p>Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2018a). Dokumen standard kurikulum dan pentaksiran Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Menengah Fizik Tingkatan 4 dan 5. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p>Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2018b). Laporan Tahunan BPK 2018. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p>Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2018c). Panduan pelaksanaan Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p>Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2019). Panduan pelaksanaan Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah (2nd ed.). Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p>Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan Dasar Pendidikan. (2017). Jerayawara Inisiatif Perkukuhan STEM 2017; Pelaksanaan Pendidikan Sains Teknologi Kejuruteraan dan Matematik (STEM).</p><p>Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan Dasar Pendidikan Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2019). Pencapaian Malaysia dalam PISA 2018. Diperoleh daripada https://www.moe.gov.my/images/KPM/UKK/2019/12_Dis/KAD_LAPORAN_P ISA_2018_latest.pdf</p><p>Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan Dasar Pendidikan Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2020). Laporan Kebangsaan TIMSS 2019 -Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p>Barak, M. (2013). Teaching engineering and technology: cognitive, knowledge and problem-solving taxonomies. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 11(3), 316333. doi:10.1108/JEDT-04-2012-0020</p><p>Baran, E., Canbazoglu Bilici, S., & Mesutoglu, C. (2016). Moving STEM Beyond Schools: Students Perceptions About an Out-of-School STEM Education Program. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 4(1), 9. doi: 10.18404/ijemst.71338</p><p>Bell, S. (2010). Project-Based Learning forthe21st Century: Skills forthe Future. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas,83(2), 39 43. doi:10.1080/00098650903505415</p><p>BERNAMA. (2019). Jumlah pelajar mengambil STEM kian merosot. Berita Harian Online.</p><p>Blank, J., &Lynch, S. (2018).TheDesign Process:Engineering Practices in Preschool. Young Children, 73(4), 89.</p><p>Blessinger, P., & Carfora, J. M. (2015). Inquiry-based learning for science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM)programs :a conceptual and practical resourcefor educators. Innovations in Higher Education Teaching and Learningg,5, 319. doi: 10.1108/S2055-364120150000004001</p><p>Bodner, G. M. (1986). Constructivism: A theory of knowledge. Journal of Chemical Education, 63(10), 873. doi:10.1021/ed063p873</p><p>Cakir, M. (2008). Constructivistapproaches to learning in scienceand theirimplication forsciencepedagogy:A literaturereview. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 3(4), 193206.</p><p>Capraro, R.M.,Capraro, M. M., & Morgan,J. R. (2013). STEM project-based learning; An integrated Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) approach (2nd editio). Sense Publisher.</p><p>Capraro, R.M., & Slough, S. W. (2013). Why PBL? Why STEM? Why now? An introduction to STEM project-based learning: An integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics approach. STEM Project-Based Learning: An Integrated Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Approach, 16. doi:10.1007/978-94-6209-143-6_1</p><p>Capraro, Robert M., & Slough, S. W. (2013). Why PBL?Why STEM?Why now? An introduction to stem project-based learning: an integrated science, technology,engineering and mathematics (STEM) approach. In Robert M. Capraro, M. M. Capraro, & J. R. Morgan (Eds.), STEM Project-Based Learning An Integrated Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Approach (2nd ed., pp. 15). Sense Publishers.</p><p>Chang, P.-L., Hsu, C.-W., & Chang, P.-C. (2011). Fuzzy Delphimethod forevaluating hydrogen production technologies. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36(21), 1417214179. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.05.045</p><p>Chapoo, S. (2019). Enhancement of 9th grader students 21st century skills through inquiry-based questions in integrated STEM activity. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2081(March). doi:10.1063/1.5094015</p><p>Cheng, C., & Lin, Y. (2002). Evaluating the best main battle tank using fuzzy decision theory.pdf. 142, 174186.</p><p>Chia, S. C., Koay, K. C., Ooi, H. B., Mohd Khairul Anuar Md Mustafa, & Rema Ragavan. (2019). Fizik tingkatan 4. Pustaka Sarjana Sdn Bhd.</p><p>Chua, Y. P. (2006a). Asas statistik penyelidikan: Kaedah dan statistik penyelidikan. McGraw-Hill Malaysia.</p><p>Chua, Y. P. (2006b). Kaedah penyelidikan. McGraw-Hill Malaysia.</p><p>Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. In Professional Development in Education (Vol. 38, Issue 3). doi: 10.1080/19415257.2011.643130</p><p>Cresswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitatives and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Pearson Education.</p><p>Creswell, J W. (2013). Research Design:Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. In Research design Qualitative quantitative and mixed methods approaches. doi:10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2</p><p>Creswell, John W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th editio, Vol. 4). Pearson Education. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004</p><p>Daly, J. C., & Cohen, J. (1978). Statistical Power Analysis fortheBehavioral Sciences, Revised Edition. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 73(363), 680. doi:10.2307/2286629</p><p>Devkota, S. P., Giri, D. R., & Bagale, S. (2017). Developing 21st Century Skillls Through Project-Based Learning in Efl Context: Challenges and Opportunities. The Online Journal of New Horizons in Education, 7(1), 4752.</p><p>Diana Susanti, Liza Yulia Sari, Vivi Fitriani, & Ramadhan Sumarmin. (2019). Need analysis of biology modul as learning media based on project based-learning. Education Journal, 8(4), 134. doi:10.11648/j.edu.20190804.11</p><p>Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and Reliability in Social Science Research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105123.</p><p>Duffield, C. (1993). The Delphi technique: A comparison of result obtained using two expert panels. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 30(3), 227237. doi: 10.1016/0020-7489(93)90033-Q</p><p>Edy Hafizan Mohd Shahali, Lilia Halim, Mohamad Sattar Rasul, Kamisah Osman, & Mohd Afendi Zulkifeli. (2016). STEM Learning through Engineering Design: Impact on Middle Secondary Students Interest towards STEM. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(5), 11891211. doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2017.00667a</p><p>Erdogan, N., & Bozeman, T. D. (2015). 3 . MODELS OF PROjECT-BASED LEARNINg FOR ThE 21 ST CENTuRy. 3142.</p><p>Erdogan, N., & Capraro, R. M. (2016). Viewing How STEM Project-Based Learning Influences Students Science Achievement Through the Implementation Lens: A Latent Growth Modeling. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(8), 21392154. doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2016.1294a</p><p>Farah Robiatul Jauhariyyah, Hadi Suwono, & Ibrohim. (2017). Science, technology, engineering and mathematics project based learning (STEM-PjBL) pada pembelajaran sains. Pros. Seminar Pend. IPA Pascasarjana UM, 2, 432436. http://pasca.um.ac.id/conferences/index.php/ipa2017/article/view/1099%0A</p><p>Fauzi Hussin, Jamal Ali, & Mohd Saifoul Zamzuri Noor. (2014). Kaedah penyelidikan & analisis data SPSS. Penerbit Universiti Utara Malaysia.</p><p>Fazilah Razali, Othman Talib, Umi Kalthom Abdul Manaf, & Siti Aishah Hassan. (2017). A Measure of Students Motivation , Attitude and Parental Influence towards Interest in STEM Career among Malaysian Form Four Science Stream Student. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(2016), 245264. doi:10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i14/3665</p><p>Fazilah Razali, Umi Kalthom Abdul Manaf, & Ahmad Fauzi Mohd Ayub. (2020). STEM Education in Malaysia towards Developing a Human Capital through Motivating Science Subject. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(5), 411422. doi: 10.26803/IJLTER.19.5.25</p><p>Fetty Shamy Lin Yahaya,& Denis Lajium. (2017). Kemahiran berfikir aras tinggisains dalam kalangan pelajar sekolah menengah melalui kaedah STEM berbantukan robot Arduino : Satu kajian kes ARDUINO: Satu kajian rintis. Seminar Kebangsaan Majlis Dekan Pendidikan Universiti Awam 2017, December, 635640. Diperoleh daripada http://conferences.cseap.edu.my/medc2017/asset/doc/BUKU_PROGRAM_MDE C.pdf</p><p>Francine, E., Jos, B., & Maldonado, C. (2011). IMA CID : an integrated modeling approach for developing educational modules. 207239. doi: 10.1007/s13173011-0043-5</p><p>Gash, H. (2014). Constructing constructivism. Constructivist Foundations, 9(3), 302 310. doi:10.4324/9781003031970-5</p><p>Ghazali Darusalam, & Sufean Hussin. (2016). Metodologi penyelidikan dalam penyelidikan: Amalan dan analisis tindakan. Penerbit Universiti Malaya.</p><p>Gross, K., & Gross, S. (2017). Transformation: Constructivism, Design, Thinking and Elementary Steam. Art Education, 69(6), 3643. doi: 10.1080/00043125.2016.1224869</p><p>Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis.pdf (7th Ed.). Pearson PrenticeHall.</p><p>Han, S., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2016). How science, technology, engineering, and mathematics project based learning affects high-need students in the U.S. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 157166. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2016.08.045</p><p>Han, S., Roslinda Rosli, Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2016). The effect of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM)project based learning (pbl) on students achievement in four mathematics topic. Journal of Turkish Science Education. Diperoleh daripada https://tused.org/index.php/tused/article/view/554</p><p>Han, S., Yalvac, B., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2015). In-service teachers implementation and understanding of STEM project based learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(1), 6376. doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2015.1306a</p><p>Harris, A., & Bruin, L. de. (2017). Secondary school creativity, teacher practice and STEAM education: An international study. Journal of Educational Change,19(2), 153179. doi:10.1007/s10833-017-9311-2</p><p>Hart, C. (1998). Doing a literature review: Sage Publications.</p><p>Hiong, S. N. (2017). Adoption of 21st Century Skills in Teaching and learning. Jurnal Penyelidikan IPGKBL, 14.</p><p>Holzman, L. (2020). Zones of Proximal Development. The Routledge Handbook of Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Development, 4255. doi: 10.4324/9781315624747-3</p><p>Ika Rahmania. (2021). Project based learning (PjBL) learning model with STEM approach in natural science learning for the 21st century. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(1), 11611167. doi:10.33258/birci.v4i1.1727</p><p>Ismi Rahayu, & Sukardi. (2020). A needs analysis forthe development of E-modules project-based learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Kejuruteraan, 3(1), 4145. doi:10.24036/jptk.v3i1.3923</p><p>Istiyono, E.(2018). IT-based HOTSassessment onphysics learning as the21st century demand at senior high schools: Expectation and reality. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2014. doi:10.1063/1.5054418</p><p>J Handhika, C Cari, W Sunarno, A Suparmi, & E Kurniadi. (2018). The influence of project-based learning on the student conception about kinematics and critical thinking skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013(1). doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012028</p><p>Jamalludin Harun, & Siti Nurulwahida Mohd Zainul Abidin. (2010). Pembangunan modul pembelajaran berbantukan video interaktif bagi pembelajaran pengaturcaraan visual basic berdasarkanpendekatan projek. Pembangunan Modul Pembelajaran Berbantukan Video Interaktif Bagi Pembelajaran Pengaturcaraan Visual Basic Berdasarkan Pendekatan Projek, 110.</p><p>Jones, H., & Brian C. Twiss. (1978). Forecasting technology for planning decisions. Macmillan.</p><p>Kalpana, T. (2014). A Constructivist Perspective on Teaching and Learning: A Conceptual Framework. International Research Journal of Social Sciences, 3(1), 2729.</p><p>Kamaleswaran Jayarajah, Rohaida Mohd Saat, & Rose Amnah Abdul Rauf. (2014). A Review of Science, Technology, Engineering & Mathematics (STEM) Education Research from 19992013: A Malaysian Perspective. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 10(3), 155163. doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2014.1072a</p><p>Kamisah Osman, Tuan Mastura Tuan Soh, & Nurazidawati Mohamad Arsad. (2010). Development and validation of the Malaysian 21st century skills instrument (M21CSI) for science students. Procedia -Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 599 603. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.204</p><p>Kang, N.-H. (2019). A review of the effect of integrated STEM or STEAM (science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics) education in South Korea. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 5(1). doi: 10.1186/s41029-019-0034-y</p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013a). Laporan awal Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025 (pendidikan prasekolah hingga lepasan menengah). Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013b). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013 2025. Education, 27(1), 1268. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007</p><p>KementerianPendidikan Malaysia. (2013c). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013 -2025 (Preschool to Post-Secondary Education). Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013d). Ringkasan eksekutif pelan pembangunan pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025 (pendidikan prasekolah hingga lepasan menengah). Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2014a). Dasar pembangunan kurikulum kebangsaan.</p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2014b). Elemen KBAT Dalam Pedagogi. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2014c). Elemen KBAT dalam Sumber. In Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2015a). Laporan Tahunan 2015 Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025: Vol. XXXIII (Issue 2). doi: 10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2</p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2015b). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2015-2025 (Higher Education). Ministry of Education Malaysia, 2025, 40. doi: 10.5923/j.ijis.20120206.05</p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2015c). Pembelajaran secara konstruktivisme.</p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2016a). Buku Penerangan Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Menengah (KSSM) (Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum (ed.)). Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2016b). Panduan pelaksanaan sains, teknologi, kejuruteraan dan matematik (STEM) dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran.</p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2017a). Panduan penggunaan buku-buku kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi (KBAT). Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2017b). Siri bahan sumber Sains, Teknologi, Engineering dan Matematik (BSTEM). Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2018a). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025 Laporan Tahunan 2017. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p>Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2018b). Penerangan dasar pendidikan tahun 2018. Diperoleh daripada https://www.moe.gov.my/pemberitahuan/pengumuman/slaid-penerangan-dasarpendidikan-2018%0A</p><p>Khusnidar Muhammad Daud. (2019). Cabaran guru prasekolah dalam menerapkan pendidikan STEM. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Matematik Malaysia, 9(2), 25 34. doi:10.37134/jpsmm.vol9.2.4.2019</p><p>Kiagus Muhammad Sobri, Hanum, F., Hutkemri Zulnaidi, Abdul Razaq Ahmad, & Alfitria. (2017). A comparative study of school environment for students skills development in Malaysia and Indonesia. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 40(1), 149154. doi:10.1016/j.kjss.2017.10.002</p><p>Kim, Y., Hye-Eun, C., & Lim, G. (2015). Science curriculum changes and STEM Education in East Asia. In M. S. Khine(Ed.), Science Education in East Asia (pp. 1629). Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-16390-1</p><p>Kleickmann, T., Richter, D., Kunter, M., Elsner, J., Besser, M., Krauss, S., & Baumert,J. (2013). Teachers Content Knowledge and Pedagogical Content Knowledge: The Role of Structural Differences in Teacher Education. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(1), 90106. doi:10.1177/0022487112460398</p><p>Kong. S,K, & MohdEffendi @ Ewan Mohd Matore. (2020). Pendekatan STEM dalam proses pengajaran dan pembelajaran : Sorotan literatur bersistematik ( SLR ). Pendidikan Sains & Matematik Malaysia, 10(2), 2942.</p><p>Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research Methodology: Methods & Techniques. In New Age International (P) Ltd. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004</p><p>KPM. (2018). Dasar pendidikan Tahun 2018.</p><p>Krajcik, J. S., & Czerniak, C. (2014). Teaching science in elementary and middle school. A project-based approach (4th ed.). Routledge.</p><p>L Yuliati, Parno, F Yogismawati, & I K Nisa. (2018). Building scientific literacy and concept achievement of Physics through inquiry-based learning for STEM education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1108(1). doi: 10.1088/17426596/1108/1/012026</p><p>LaForce, M., Noble, E., & Blackwell, C. (2017). Problem-Based Learning (PBL) and Student Interest in STEM Careers: The Roles of Motivation and Ability Beliefs. Education Sciences, 7(4), 92. doi:10.3390/educsci7040092</p><p>Lay, A.-N., & Kamisah Osman. (2018). Integrated STEM education: Promoting STEM literacy and 21st century learning. In D. M. Shelley & D. S. A. Kiray (Eds.), Research Highlights in STEM Education (pp. 6680). Isres Publishing.</p><p>Lee, C. H. (2015). Pembangunan dan keberkesanan Modul Bio-STEM dalam pemupukan kemahiran abad ke-21 dan peningkatan pencapaian bagi topik Nutrisi. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.</p><p>Lee, C. H. (2018). Keberkesanan modul BIO-STEM dalam peningkatan pencapaian topik nutrisi di sekolah luar bandar. Jurnal Penyelidikan IPGK BL, 15(i), 114. Diperoleh daripada http://www.ipbl.edu.my/portal/penyelidikan/jurnalpapers/jurnal2018_1/LCHconverted.pdf%0A</p><p>Lee, C. H., & Kamisah Osman. (2014). Development and validation of BTEM Module to enhances 21st century skills. In D. R. Peter, Zurida Ismail, & Ng Khar Thoe (Eds.), Empowering the future generation through science education (pp. 3447). Publication Unit SEAMEO RECSAM.</p><p>Lee, C. H., & Kamisah Osman. (2017). Biologi dalam pendidikan STEM. Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.</p><p>Lee, Chuo Hiong. (2015). Pembangunan dan keberkesanan Modul Bio-STEM dalam pemupukan kemahiran abad ke-21 dan peningkatan pencapaian bagi topik Nutrisi. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.</p><p>Lembaga Peperiksaan Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2021). Laporan analisis keputusan Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia Tahun 2020.</p><p>Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia. (2013). Pentaksiran Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi. 513.</p><p>Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia. (2019). Pengumuman Analisis Keputusan SIJIL PELAJARAN MALAYSIA (SPM) 2018.</p><p>Lesseig, K., Nelson, T. H., Seidel, R. A., & Slavit, D. (2015). Supporting middle school teachers implementation of STEM design challenges. NARST 2015 Annual International Conference, 116(4), 177188. doi: 10.1111/ssm.12172</p><p>Lilia Ellany Mohtar. (2019). Model sumbangan kreativiti, sikap, efikasi kendiri dan motivasi terhadap pencapaian Fizik pelajar tingkatan empat. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.</p><p>Lilia Halim, Zolkepeli Haron, & T.Subahan M. Meerah. (2002). Strategi pengajaran Fizik untuk guru sains. Prentice Hall.</p><p>Lombardi, M. M. (2016). Authentic Learning for the 21st Century : An Overview Authentic Learning for the 21st Century : An Overview. January 2007.</p><p>Lou, S. J., Chou, Y. C., Shih, R. C., & Chung, C. C. (2017). A study of creativity in CAC2 steamship-derived STEM project-based learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 23872404. doi: 10.12973/EURASIA.2017.01231A</p><p>Lou, S. J., Liu, Y. H., Shih, R. C., & Tseng, K. H. (2011). The senior high school students learning behavioral model of STEM in PBL. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 21(2), 161183. doi: 10.1007/s10798-0109112-x</p><p>Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and Quantificatiom of Conten Validity.pdf. doi: 10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017</p><p>Mafulul, M. J. (2012). School location versus academic achievement in physics: Does computer-assisted instruction (CAI) has any effect? Journal of Educational andSocial Research, 2(October), 162168. doi: 10.5901/jesr.2012.v2n8p162</p><p>Maltese, A. V., & Tai, R.H. (2011). Pipeline persistence: Examining the association of educational experiences with earned degrees in STEM among U.S. students. Science Education, 95(5), 877907. doi: 10.1002/sce.20441</p><p>Matsuura, T., & Nakamura, D. (2021). Trends in STEM/STEAM Education and Students Perceptions in Japan. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 7(1), 733. doi: 10.1163/23641177-bja10022</p><p>Maziah Mohd Sapar, Muhammad Nubli Abdul Wahab, & Mohd Firdaus Mohd Kamaruzaman. (2012). Keberkesanan modul LINUS berbantukan terapi Biofeedback 5EmWaveterhadapmurid-murid, di Zon Chenor, Pahang. Prosiding Seminar Internasional Pasca Siswazah Pendidikan Khas UKM-UPI Siri II 2012, Pierce, 110120. Diperoleh daripada http://umpir.ump.edu.my/4400/</p><p>Mazlini Adnan, Aminah Ayob, Ong, E. T., Mohd Nasir Ibrahim, Noriah Ishak, & Jameyah Sheriff. (2016). Memperkasa pembangunan modal insan Malaysia di peringkat kanak-kanak: Kajian kebolehlaksanaan dan kebolehintegrasian pendidikan STEM dalam kurikulum PERMATA Negara. GEOGRAFIA Online Malaysian Journal of Soiety and Space, 1(12), 2936. Diperoleh daripada http://ejournal.ukm.my/gmjss/article/download/17580/5395</p><p>Mazliza Mohtar, Yee Siew Kuan, Ong Sy Ing, & Mariati Mokhtar. (2018). Tahap pemikiran inventif pelajar pintar dan berbakat dalam subjek fizik. Journal of Humanities, Language, Culture and Business (HLCB), 2(7), 18.</p><p>Meng, C. C., & Noraini Idris. (2016). Form Four Science Students Perceptions of the Quality of Learning Experiences Provided by Assessments in STEM Related Subjects. International Journal of Assessment and Evaluation in Education, 5(2012), 5056.</p><p>MESTECC. (2018). Bicara Menteri Sains Teknologi dan Inovasi: Membudayakan Sains, Teknologi Dan Inovasi Dalam Pembangunan Modal Insan Negara. Portal Rasmi Kementerian Tenaga, Sains, Teknologi, Alam Sekitar & Perubahan Iklim (MESTECC).</p><p>Mintzes, J., Wandersee, J., & Novak,J. (1997).Teaching scienceforunderstanding: A human constructivist view. In Preparing Teachers for Inclusive Education. doi: 10.4324/9781410605764-10</p><p>Mispuah Hassan, & Kamisah Osman. (2016). Pembelajaran biologi berasaskan projek. Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.</p><p>Mohamad Hisyam Ismail, Muhamad Furkan Mat Salleh, & Sharipah Ruzaina Syed Aris. (2017). Malaysian Education Plan 2013-2025: Transformation on Science Classroom towards Students Achievement in TIMSS and PISA. The Social Sciences, 12(1), 7984. doi: 10.3923/sscience.2017.79.84</p><p>Mohamad Sattar Rasul, Faszly Rahim, LiliaHalim, Zanaton Iksan, & Kamisah Osman. (2018). Modul Bitara STEM: Komuniti pintar Sains. Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.</p><p>Mohamad Sattar Rasul, Lilia Halim, & Zanaton Ikhsan. (2016). Using STEM integrated Approach to Nurture Students Interest ans 21st Century Skills. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational & Social Sciences (EPESS), 4, 313319. Diperoleh daripada www.isres.org</p><p>Mohamad Sattar Rasul, Lilia Halim, Zanaton Ikhsan, Edy Hafizan Mohd Shahili, & RaifanaRosa. (2015). Impact Studies of IntegratedSTEM Program. International Journal of Technical Research and Applications, 35(35), 15.</p><p>Mohd Afizi Md Ali. (n.d.). 3 Gelombang pendidikan PPPM 2013-2025. Diperoleh daripada https://www.sistemguruonline.my/2018/01/3-gelombang-pendidikan-pppm-2013-2025.html%0A%0A</p><p>Mohd Ali Samsudin, Seyedh Mahboobeh Jamali, Ahmad Nurulazam Md Zain, & Nader AleEbrahim. (2020). Theeffect of STEM project based learning on self-efficacy among high-school physics students. Journal of Turkish Science Education,17(1), 94108. doi:10.36681/tused.2020.15</p><p>Mohd Azli Yeop, & Abdul Latif Gapor. (2012). Kesan pendekatan pembelajaran berasaskan projek berteraskan teknologi terhadap pencapaian dan penerimaan pelajar. Jurnal Pendidikan Bitara UPSI, 5, 114. Diperoleh daripada http://www.myjurnal.my/filebank/published_article/26245/4.pdf</p><p>Mohd Iskandar Ibrahim. (2018). Malaysia kekurangan saintis dan jurutera. Berita Harian Online.</p><p>Mohd Nazri Hassan, Ramlee Mustapha, Nik Azimah Nik Yusuff, & Rosnidar Mansor. (2017a). Pembangunan modul kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi di dalam mata pelajaran sains sekolah rendah: analisis keperluan guru. Sains Humanika, 9:1-5, 119125. Diperoleh daripada https://sainshumanika.utm.my/index.php/sainshumanika/article/view/1185</p><p>Mohd Nazri Hassan, Ramlee Mustapha, Nik Azimah Nik Yusuff, & Rosnidar Mansor. (2017b). Pembangunan modul kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi di dalam mata pelajaransains sekolahrendah: Analisiskeperluan guru. Sains Humanika, 9(15). doi:10.11113/sh.v9n1-5.1185</p><p>Mohd Noor Badlishah Abdul Kadir, Mohd Mustamam Abdul Karim, & Nurul Huda Abd. Rahman. (2016). Sikap pelajar terhadap pembelajaran fizik dan hubungannyadengan pencapaian dalam kalangan pelajar sains. Jurnal Personalia Pelajar, 19(1), 3151. Diperoleh daripada http://www.ukm.my/personalia/publication-category/jilid-1/%0A</p><p>Mohd Ridhuan Mohd Jamil, Saedah Siraj, Zaharah Hussin, Nurulrabihah Mat Noh, & Ahmad Arifin Sapar. (2017). Pengenalan asas kaedah Fuzzy Delphi dalam penyelidikan rekabentuk dan pembangunan (2nd ed.). MindaIntelek Agency.</p><p>Mohd Sahandri Gani Hamzah, Laily Paim, Sharifah Azizah Haron, & Mohd Faizal Nizam Lee Abdullah. (2013). Buku panduan pembinaan instrumen Anda dan Kepenggunaan. Emeritus Publications.</p><p>Mohd Syaubari Othman, & Ahmad Yunus Kassim. (2018). Hubungan pelaksanaan komposisi pembelajaran yang mengintergrasikan kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi (KBAT) dengan pencapaian pelajar di dalam matapelajaran Pendidikan Islam. E-Jurnal Penyelidikan Dan Inovasi, 5(1), 6380.</p><p>Mohd YazidMohd Shariff. (2013).KeberkesananpenggunaanperisianGoogle Sketch-Up terhadap peningkatan pencapaian dan minat pelajar dalam subtopik Lukisan Ortografik Tingkatan Dua. Jurnal Bahagian Teknologi Pendidikan, 1(2013).</p><p>Moore, T.J., Johnson, C. C., Peters-Burton, E. E., & Guzey, S. S. (2016). The need for STEM roadmap. In STEM road map: A framework for integrated STEM education. Routledge Taylor & Francis.</p><p>Moore, TamaraJ., Hynes, M. M., Purzer,S., Glancy, A.W., Siverling, E. A., Tank,K. M., Matins, C. A., & Guzey, S. S. (2015).STEM integration: Evidenceofstudentlearning in design-based curricula. Proceedings -Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, 2015-Febru(February). doi: 10.1109/FIE.2014.7044216</p><p>Moreno, N. P., Tharp, B. Z., Vogt, G., Newell, A. D., & Burnett, C. A. (2016). Preparing Students for Middle School Through After-School STEM Activities. Journal of Science Education and Technology. doi: 10.1007/s10956-016-9643-3</p><p>MOSTI. (2017). Pelan Strategik Kementerian Sains, Teknologi dan Inovasi (MOSTI) 2016-2020. Kementerian Sains, Teknologi dan Inovasi (MOSTI).</p><p>Muhammad Abd Hadi Bunyamin. (2016). Pendidikan STEM Bersepadu : Perspektif Global , Perkembangan Semasa di Malaysia , dan Langkah Kehadapan. Research Gate, 01 October 2016.</p><p>Muhammad Nazir Mohammed Khalid. (2021). Menerokai rahsia STEM (Sciences, Technology, Engineering & Math) dalam Al-Quran (4th ed.). Mommy Happy Group Sdn. Bhd.</p><p>Muhammad Nur Hudha, John Rafafy Batlolona, & Wartono Wartono. (2019). Science literation ability and physics concept understanding in the topic of work and energy with inquiry-STEM. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2202(December). doi: 10.1063/1.5141676</p><p>Muhammad Syukri, Soewarno, S., Lilia Halim, & Lilia Ellany Mohtar. (2018). The impact of engineering design process in teaching and learning to enhancestudents science problem-solving skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(1), 6675. doi:10.15294/jpii.v7i1.12297</p><p>Muijs, D. (2004). Doing quantitative research in education with SPSS. In D. Avison &J. Pries-Heje.Sage Publications.</p><p>Mukhtar, N. M. A., Hashim, F., Mokhtar, M., & Wahab, Nor Aimi Abdul Mohd Napiah, Noorezal Atfyinna Hasan, S. (2017). Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Pencapaian Pelajar Dalam Mata Pelajaran Fizik: Satu Sudut Pandangan. International Academic Research Journal of Social Science, 3(1), 195201.</p><p>Musasia, A. M., Ocholla,A. A., & Sakwa, T. W. (2016). Physics practical work and its influenceon students academicachievement. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(28), 129134.</p><p>Museum of ScienceBoston. (2008). Engineeringthe Future : Science, Technology, and design process: Teacher Guide. In Engineering. Key Curriculum Press.</p><p>N Diana, Yohannes, & Y Sukma. (2021). The effectiveness of implementing project-based learning (PjBL) model in STEM education: A literature review. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1882(1). doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1882/1/012146</p><p>Nik Syaharudin Nik Daud, Mohd. Mustamam Abd. Karim, Nor Lelawati Hassan, & Nurulhuda Abdul Rahman. (2015). Kajian keberkesanan prinsip momentumimpuls bagi mata pelajaran Fizik SPM. Jurnal Pemikir Pendidikan, 6, 95105. Diperoleh daripada http://www.jpp.edu.my/index.php/journal/full/6_7.pdf</p><p>Noor Hidayah Ibrahim, & Zanaton H.Iksan. (2017). Strategi metakognitif untuk kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi dalam proses pengajaran dan pembelajaran. Simposium Pendidikan DiPeribadikan: Perspektif Risalah An-Nur (SPRiN2017), 131139.</p><p>NorKhayati Basir, Mohd IsaHamzah, & Khadijah Abdul Razak. (2017). Sikap dalam pembelajaran berasaskan projek terhadap pencapaian pelajar di Politeknik Perak. Tinta Artikulasi Membina Ummah, 3(1), 114.</p><p>Noraini Idris. (2013). Penyelidikan dalam pendidikan (2nd ed.). Mc-Graw Hill Education.</p><p>Norhaqikah Mohamad Khalil, & Kamisah Osman. (2017). STEM-21CS module : Fostering 21st century skills through integrated STEM. K-12 STEM Education, 3(3), 225233. Diperoleh daripada https://smk.ukm.my/erep/fail3.cfm?komp=TGG2017804</p><p>Norhaslinda Abdul Samad, & Kamisah Osman. (2017). EkSTEMiT learning module and inculcation of inventive thinking. K-12 STEM Education, 3(4), 259266. Diperoleh daripada http://www.k12stemeducation.in.th/journal/article/download/63/111</p><p>Norjanah Ambo, Siew, N. M., & Crispina Gregory K Han. (2018). Developing an Integrated Project-Based Learning and STEM Learning Module For Fostering Creativity Among Fifth Graders. International Journal of Current Research, 10(09), 7346673473.</p><p>Norlidah Alias. (2010). Pembangunan modul pedagogi berasaskan teknologi dan gaya pembelajaran Felder-Silverman kurikulum Fizik sekolah menengah. Universiti Malaya.</p><p>Norlidah Alias, Saedah Siraj, Mohd. Nazri Abdul Rahman, & Dorothy Dewitt. (2013). Design and Development Research Emergent Trends in Educational Research. In</p><p>D. D. & Z. H. Saedah Siraj, Norlidah Alias (Ed.), Design and Development Research Emergent Trends in Educational Research (pp.215). Pearson Malaysia Sdn Bhd.</p><p>Norlizawaty, B., & Nurzatulshima, K. (2018). STEM ASEANProject to Promote 21 st Century Teaching and Learning. Learning Sciences and Mathematics Journal, 0832(13), 98114.</p><p>Norlizawaty Baharin, Nurzatulshima Kamarudin, & Umi Kalthom Abdul Manaf. (2018). Integrating STEM education approachin enhancing higher orderthinking skills. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(7), 810821. doi:10.6007/ijarbss/v8-i7/4421</p><p>Normawarni bt Hasan, & LiliaHalim. (2018). Kemahiran MenyelesaikanMasalah Bagi TopikKeseimbangan. Seminar Antarabangsa Isu-Isu Pendidikan, 197125.</p><p>Normawarni Hasan, & Lilia Halim. (2018). Kemahiran menyelesaikan masalah bagi topik keseimbangan dan leraian daya. Seminar Antarabangsa Isu-Isu Pendidikan (ISPEN2018). Diperoleh daripada http://conference.kuis.edu.my/ispen/wpcontent/uploads/2018/08/21.normawarni_hasan.pdf</p><p>NurAmeliaAdam, & LiliaHalim. (2019). Cabaran pengintegrasian pendidikan STEM dalam kurikulum Malaysia. Seminar Wacana Pendidikan, September, 110.</p><p>NurChoiro Siregar, RoslindaRosli, &Siti MistimaMaat. (2018). Pembangunan modul D.STEM dalam topik bentuk ruang sisi datar. Jurnal Penyelidikan Pendidikan, February 2020.</p><p>Nur Fadhila Baharudin. (2016). Pembinaan dan keberkesanan Modul PBM-SC2 Terhadap KBAT, Motivasi dan Refleksi Pelajar. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.</p><p>Nur Farhana Ramli, & Othman Talib. (2017). Can education institution implement STEM? From Malaysian teachers view. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(3), 721732. doi: 10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i3/2772</p><p>Nur Hidayah Alawi, & Tuan Mastura Tuan Soh. (2019). The Effect of Project-Based Learning (PjBL) on Critical Thinking Skills Form Four Students on Dynamic Ecosystem Topic Vector!Oh!Vector! Creative Education, 10(12), 31073117. doi:10.4236/ce.2019.1012235</p><p>NurMaizatulAzraMukhtar, Faizal Hashim, MarinaMokhtar, NorAimiAbdul Wahab, Noorezal Atfyinna Mohd Napiah, & Suhaiza Hasan. (2017). Faktor yang mempengaruhi pencapaian pelajar dalam mata pelajaran Fizik: Satu Sudut pandangan. International Academic Research Journal of Social Science, 3(1), 195201.</p><p>Nur Rosliana Mohd Hafiz, & Shahrul Kadri Ayop. (2020). The effect of an integrated-stem waterrocket module(SEMARAK)on stem elements application among form four students. International STEM Journal, 1(1), 116. Diperoleh daripada https://ejournal.um.edu.my/index.php/STEM/article/view/27154</p><p>Nurashikin Muzafar. (2015). Pembinaan Modul Bio Three dan kesannya terhadap penguasaan konsep serta kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi murid tingkatan empat. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.</p><p>Nurul Heni Astuti, Ani Rusilowati, & Bambang Subali. (2021). STEM-Based learning analysis to improve students problem solving abilities in science subject: A literature review. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 9(3), 7986. doi: 10.15294/jise.v9i2.38505</p><p>Nurul Huda Kasim. (2020). Pembangunan modul PRO-STEM bagi topik biodiversiti dan ekosistem serta kesannya terhadap KBAT dan kemahiran abad ke-21. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.</p><p>Nurul Huda Kasim, & Che Nidzam Che Ahmad. (2018). PRO-STEM module: The development and validation. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(1), 728739. doi: 10.6007/ijarbss/v8-i1/3843</p><p>Nurul Huda Kasim, & Che Nidzam Che Ahmad. (2019). Modul PRO-STEM. Aras Mega(M) Sdn. Bhd.</p><p>Nurul Nashrah, Noor Hasimah, & Nur Aida. (2015). Matematik dan kemahiran abad ke-21: perspektif pelajar. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematik, 3(1), 2436. doi: 10.3171/2015.4.JNS15194</p><p>Nurul Nashrah Salehudin, Noor Hashimah Hassan, & Nur Aida Abd Hamid. (2015). Matematik dan Kemahiran Abad ke-21: Pespektif Pelajar. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematik, 3(1), 2436.</p><p>Nurzarina Amran, & Roslinda Rosli. (2017). Kefahaman Guru Tentang Kemahiran Abad Ke-21 (Teachers Understanding In 21st Century Skills). Persidangan Antarabangsa Sains Sosial Dan Kemanusiaan Kali Ke-2. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004</p><p>Nurzarina Amran, & Roslinda Rosli. (2015). Kefahaman guru tentang kemahiran abad ke-21.Persidangan Antarabangsa Sains Sosial Dan Kemanusiaan (PASAK 2017), 21, 130. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004</p><p>Olufunke, B. T., & Blessing, O. O. (2014). Achievement in physics using mastery learning and mind mapping approaches: Implication on gender and attitude. International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education (IJHSSE), 1(12), 154161. Diperoleh daripada https://www.arcjournals.org/pdfs/ijhsse/v1i12/20.pdf%0A</p><p>Othman Talib. (2017). SPSS: Analisis data kuantitatif untuk penyelidik muda (Cetakan Ke). MPWS Rich Publication.</p><p>Paiva, C. E., Barroso, E. M., Carneseca, E. C., de Padua Souza, C., Dos Santos, F. T., Mendoza Lopez, R. V., & Ribeiro Paiva, S. B. (2014). A critical analysis of test-retest reliability in instrument validation studies of cancer patients under palliative care: a systematic review. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 14, 8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-8</p><p>Pardjono. (2002). Active Learning: The Dewey, Piaget, Vygotsky and Constructivist Theory Perspectives. In Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan (Vol. 9, Issue 3, pp. 163178).</p><p>Parno, Yuliati, L., & Nimah, B. Q. A. (2019). The influence of PBL-STEM on students problem-solving skills in the topic of optical instruments. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1171, 012013. doi: 10.1088/17426596/1171/1/012013</p><p>Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Owen, S. V. (2007). Is the CVIan Acceptable Indicator of Content Validity? Appraisal and Recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 30(4), 459467. doi:10.1002/nur</p><p>Rabacal, J. S., Geroso, M. J. S., & Oliveros, J. A. (2018). Developing Students 21 Century Skills Using Project Based Learning. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 6(2), 4753.</p><p>Rajendran, N. . (2017). Pengajaran dan penguasaan kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi: Teori dan amalan. Penerbit UPSI.</p><p>Ramlan Mustapa, & Ghazali Darusalam. (2018). Aplikasi kaedah Fuzzy Delphi dalam penyelidikan sains sosial. Penerbit Universiti Malaya.</p><p>Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2005). Developmental research methods: Creating knowledge from instructional design and development practice. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 16(2), 2338. doi: 10.1007/BF02961473</p><p>Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2014). Design and development research. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology: Fourth edition (pp. 141150).doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5</p><p>RitaC. Richey & James D. Klein. (2007). Design and Development Research Methods, Strategies, and Issues. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.</p><p>Rizki Amelia, & Sandy Tegariyani Putri Santoso. (2021). 21st century skills in project based learning integrated stem on science subject: a systematic literature review. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 529(Iconetos 2020), 583590. doi:10.2991/assehr.k.210421.085</p><p>Rohana Amin. (2015). Pembangunan dan pengesahan instrumen Ujian Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi Fizik bagi Tajuk Daya dan Gerakan. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.</p><p>Rohana Mohd Atan, & Shaharom Noordin. (2008). Hubungan antara amalan kerja amali dengan pencapaian pelajar tingkatan empat dalam tajuk daya. Seminar Kebangsaan Pendidikan Sains Dan Matematik. Diperoleh daripada http://www.ppsmj.com.my/seminar2008/html/kertaskerja21-30.htm#P26_</p><p>Roslina Abd Karim, & Ikhsan, Z. (2017). Keberkesanan pembelajaran berasaskan projek ke atas pengetahuan, sikap dan tingkah laku murid tahun 5 terhadap tajuk tenaga. Conference Kuis Pasak 2017 Prosiding Pendidikan. Diperoleh daripada http://conference.kuis.edu.my/pasak2017/images/prosiding/pendidikan/03ROSLINA-ABD-KARIM.pdf</p><p>Ruhizan Mohammad Yasin, Latifah Amin, & Kok Kean Hin. (2018). Pembangunan modul interdisiplin BTEM dengan model reka bentuk instruksional Morrison, Ross, Kalman & Kemp. In Muhammad Fariduddin Wajdi Anthony, Zahiroh Awang, & Saerah Shuib (Eds.), International Postgraduate Conference On Research In Education (IPCORE 2018) (pp. 5283). Unit Penyelidikan Pendidikan Asas (UPPA) Pusat Pengajian Ilmu Pendidikan Universiti Sains Malaysia.</p><p>Saedah Siraj, Muhammad Ridhuan Tony Lim Abdullah, & Rozaini Muhamad Rozkee. (2020). Pendekatan penyelidikan rekabentuk dan pembangunan: Aplikasi kepada penyelidikan pendidikan. Penerbit Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.</p><p>Sahin, A., Ayar, M., & Adigzel, T. (2014). STEM related after-school program activities and associated outcomes on student learning. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14(1), 297322.</p><p>Salbihana Samsudin, Nor AidillinaMohd Ramli, & LiliaHalim. (2018). Belajar sains di rumah: Peranan keluarga dan guru. Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.</p><p>Salehudin Sabar, & Mahadi Khalid. (2005). Kertas konsep faktor-faktor graduan berkerjaya memilih kursus perguruan lepas ijazahpengkhususan sekolah rendah. Jurnal Penyelidikan MPBL. Diperoleh daripada http://www.ipbl.edu.my/portal/penyelidikan/jurnalpapers/jurnal2005/salehudinjp 2005.pdf</p><p>SalinaMuhamad, Muhammad Nazir, Zahirrudin Idris, & Sahrul Izwan Sapardi. (2019). Kebolehintegrasian pendidikan Al-Quran dan STEM: Kajian kesedaran di kalangan pelajar maahad tahfiz sains. Selangor Science & Technology Review (SeSTeR), 3(2).</p><p>Salmiza Saleh, Azila Muhammad, & Syed Mohamad Syed Abdullah. (2020). STEM project-based approach in enhancing conceptual understanding and inventive thinking skills among secondary school students. Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS), 5(1), 234254. doi:10.24200/jonus.vol5iss1pp234-254</p><p>Sangoseni, O., Hellman, M., & Hill, C. (2013). Development and Validation of a questionnaire to assess the effect of online learning on behaviors, attitudes, and clinical practices of physical therapists in the United States regarding evidenced-based clinical practice. The Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice, 11(2), 112.</p><p>Sazilah Sam, & Mohd Faizal Nizam Lee Abdullah. (2017). Development and evaluation of form three mathematics i-Think module (Mi-T3) on algebraic formulae topic. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1847. doi: 10.1063/1.4983895</p><p>Seluk, G. S., Caliskan, S., & Sahin, M. (2013). A comparison of achievement in problem-based,strategic and traditional learning classes in physics. In International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their (pp. 141309). Diperoleh daripada http://www.ijonte.org/FileUpload/ks63207/File/14.selcuk.pdf%0A</p><p>Sidek Mohd Noah. (2002). Reka bentuk penyelidikan: Falsafah, teori dan praktis. Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia.</p><p>Sidek Mohd Noah, & Jamaludin Ahmad. (2005a). Pembinaan modul: Bagaimana membina modul latihan dan modul akademik.Penerbit UniversitiPutraMalaysia.</p><p>Siew, N. M., &Norjanah Ambo. (2018). Development and evaluation of an integrated project-based and stem teaching and learning module on enhancing scientific creativity among fifth graders. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(6), 1017 1033. doi:10.33225/jbse/18.17.1017</p><p>Siti Fazidah Mat Yaacob. (2015). Analisis penguasaan Kemahiran Abad ke-21 dalam kalangan pelajar tingkatan empat di daerah Gua Musang, Kelantang. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.</p><p>Siti Nabila Khalid, Muzirah Musa, Fainida Rahmat, Nurul Akmal Mohamed, & Nor Azian Aini Mat. (2019). Pembangunan dan penilaian modul pengajaran STEM dalam bidang statistik dan kebarangkalian dalam KSSM matematik tingkatan dua. Journal of Quality Measurement and Analysis, 15(2), 2534. Diperoleh daripada http://www.ukm.my/jqma</p><p>Siti Nur Diyana Mahmud, Nurfaradilla Mohamad Nasri, Mohd Ali Samsudin, & Lilia Halim. (2018). Science teacher education in Malaysia: Challenges and way forward. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 4(8).</p><p>Siti Nursaila Alias, & Faridah Ibrahim. (2017). Keberkesanan permainan pendidikan terhadap pembelajaran Hukum Newton. Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS), 2(1), 71. doi:10.24200/jonus.vol2iss1pp71-85</p><p>Siti Uzairiah Mohd Tobi. (2018). Mudahnya kajian literatur: Formula berkesan mengenalpasti gap. Reezqi Publication.</p><p>Soros, P., Ponkham, K., & Ekkapim, S. (2018). Theresults of STEM education methods forenhancing critical thinking and problem solving skill in physics the 10th grade level. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1923. doi: 10.1063/1.5019536</p><p>Struyf, A., De Loof, H., Boeve-de Pauw, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2019). Students engagement in different STEM learning environments: integrated STEM education as promising practice? International Journal of Science Education, 41(10), 13871407. doi:10.1080/09500693.2019.1607983</p><p>Supeno, SAstutik, SBektiarso, A D Lesmono, & L Nuraini. (2019). What can students show about higher order thinking skills in physics learning? IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 243(1). doi: 10.1088/17551315/243/1/012127</p><p>Taber, K. S. (2017). The Use of Cronbachs Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in ScienceEducation. Research in Science Education,124. doi:10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2</p><p>Teo, T. W. (2018). STEM Education Landscape: The Case of Singapore. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1340(1). doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1340/1/012002</p><p>Thibaut, L., Ceuppens, S., De Loof, H., De Meester, J., Goovaerts, L., Struyf, A., Boeve-de Pauw, J., Dehaene, W., Deprez, J., De Cock, M., Hellinckx, L., Knipprath, H., Langie, G., Struyven, K., Van de Velde, D., Van Petegem, P., & Depaepe, F. (2018). Integrated STEM Education: A Systematic Review of Instructional Practices in Secondary Education. European Journal of STEM Education, 3(1). doi:10.20897/ejsteme/85525</p><p>Thomas, B., & Watters, J. J. (2015). Perspectives on Australian, Indian and Malaysian approaches to STEM education. International Journal of Educational Development. doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2015.08.002</p><p>Tseng, K. H., Chang, C. C., Lou, S.J., &Chen, W.P. (2013). Attitudes towards science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) in a project-based learning (PjBL) environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(1), 87102. doi:10.1007/s10798-011-9160-x</p><p>Tuan Mastura Tuan Soh, Kamisah Osman, & Nurazidawati Mohamad Arsad. (2012). M-21CSI : A validated 21 st century skills instrument for secondary science students. Asian Social Science, 8(16), 3844. doi: 10.5539/ass.v8n16p38</p><p>Tuan Mastura Tuan Soh, Nurazidawati Mohamad Arsad, & Kamisah Osman. (2010a). Penguasaan Kemahiran Abad Ke-21 dalam kalangan pelajar yang mengambil matapelajaran Fizik. In Journal of Applied Research in Education (Vol. 14, Issue 2, pp. 248263).</p><p>Tuan Mastura Tuan Soh, Nurazidawati Mohamad Arsad, & Kamisah Osman. (2010b). Therelationship of 21stcentury skills on students attitudeand perception towards physics. Procedia -Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7(2), 546554. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.10.073</p><p>Tuckman, B. W., & Waheed, M. A. (1981). Evaluating an individualized science program for community college students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 18(6), 489495. doi:10.1002/tea.3660180603</p><p>van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2020). Determinants of 21st-Century Skills and 21st-Century Digital Skills for Workers: A Systematic Literature Review. SAGE Open, 10(1). doi: 10.1177/2158244019900176</p><p>Videnovic, M. (2018). Introduction of 21st Century Skills in Primary Schools : Case Study Macedonia. April.</p><p>Vinogharri Muniandy. (2014). Penerapan strategi pengutaraan masalah untuk meningkatkan kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi. 1st International Education Postgraduate Seminar. Diperoleh daripada http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/61263/%0A</p><p>Wafry Khairul Ziad, Muhammad Fadhly Ahlamie Md NorAzam, Hatika Kaco, Fadzidah Mohd Idris, Nor Raihan Zulkefly, Siti Munirah Mohd, & Nur Hidayah Mohamad Jan. (2021). An Evaluation of Student s Perception Towards Learning Physics at Lower Secondary School. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan MatematikMalaysia, 11(Special Issue), 94106.</p><p>Wan Nor Fadzilah, W. A., Nurazidawati, M. O., Lilia, H., Mohamad Sattar, R., Kamisah, O., & Zanaton, I. (2016). Fostering students 21stcentury skills through Project Oriented Problem Based Learning ( POPBL ) in integrated STEM education program. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching,17(1).</p><p>Winarti, Cari, Sunarmo, & Edi Istiyono. (2015). Analysis of higherorder thinking skills content of physicsexaminations in Madrasah Aliyah. International Conference on Mathematics, Science, and Education 2015 (ICMSE 2015).</p><p>Wong, W. S., & Kamisah Osman. (2018). Pembelajaran berasaskan permainan dalam pendidikan STEM dan penguasaan kemahiran abad ke-21. Politeknik & Kolej Komuniti Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(1), 121135. Diperoleh daripada http://myjms.moe.gov.my/index.php/PMJSSH/article/view/4678%0A</p><p>Yun, E. (2020). Review of trends in physics education research using topic modelling. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(3), 388400.</p><p>Yusni Mohamad Yusop, Melati Sumari, Fatanah Mohamed, Shahriza Said, Mohd Ibrahim K. Azeez, & Mohd Ridhuan Mohd Jamil. (2015). The needs analysis in self-concept module development. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Science, 3(1), 4455.Diperoleh daripada www.moj-es.net</p><p>Yusri Mohamad Yusop, Melati Sumari, Fatanah Mohamed, Shahriza Said, Mohd Ibrahim K.Azeez, & Jamil, M. R. M. (2015). The needs analysis in self-concept moduledevelopment.The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Science,3(1), 4455. doi:10.1016/S0765-1597(02)00066-7</p><p>Zamanzadeh, V., Ghahramanian, A., Rassouli, M., Abbaszadeh, A., Alavi-Majd, H., & Nikanfar, A.-R. (2015). Design and Implementation Content Validity Study: Development of an instrument for measuring Patient-Centered Communication. Journal of Caring Sciences, 4(2), 165178. doi: 10.15171/jcs.2015.017</p><p>Zanariah Ahmad. (2017). Pembangunan modul pedagogi kelas berbalik berasaskan pembelajaran reflektif untuk politeknik premier. Universiti Malaya.</p><p></p>

Similar Items