Analisis ciri-ciri klasikisme dalam Purananuru dengan menggunakan teori Sevviyal

Analisis ciri-ciri klasikisme dalam Purananuru dengan menggunakan teori Sevviyal

<p>This study examines the features of classicism in the work of Purananuru. The</p><p>objective of this study is to identify the characteristics of classicism, analyze the</p><p>characteristics of classicism and explain the uniqu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Vanitha Paranjotii
Format: thesis
Language:tam
Published: 2021
Subjects:
PL Languages and literatures of Eastern Asia
Africa
Oceania
Online Access:https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=9747
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:9747
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
collection UPSI Digital Repository
language tam
topic PL Languages and literatures of Eastern Asia
Africa
Oceania
spellingShingle PL Languages and literatures of Eastern Asia
Africa
Oceania
Vanitha Paranjotii
Analisis ciri-ciri klasikisme dalam Purananuru dengan menggunakan teori Sevviyal
description <p>This study examines the features of classicism in the work of Purananuru. The</p><p>objective of this study is to identify the characteristics of classicism, analyze the</p><p>characteristics of classicism and explain the uniqueness of the characteristics of</p><p>classicism in the work of Purananuru. This study is based on eight features of</p><p>classicism. This study uses source data taken from 400 poems found in the work of</p><p>Purananuru. The analysis and discussion are made based on the Sevviyal Theory</p><p>pioneered by Manavai Mustafa. This study uses a qualitative method that includes</p><p>textual and descriptive analysis studies. The results show that Purananuru has eight</p><p>sevviyal aspects namely thonmai, thanithanmai, pothupanpu, nadunilamai,</p><p>panpaaddu kalai paddarivu velipadu, ilakkiya valam, uyarsinthanai and kalai ilakkiya</p><p>thanithanmai velippadu pangkalippu. The findings of the study show that, the</p><p>elements of classicism found in Purananuru can be divided into eight sevviyal</p><p>features and the sevviyal features abundant in the works of Purananuru are</p><p>pothupanpu, panpaaddu kalai paddarivu velipadu and uyarsinthanai. The findings of</p><p>the study also prove that the eight sevviyal features recorded in Purananuru can</p><p>explain the uniqueness of its classicism. The results of this study will be a guideline to</p><p>the younger generation to identify and understand the characteristics of sevviyal</p><p>behavior found in classical Tamil literary texts. This framework can also be applied</p><p>by other researchers using our local Tamil literary texts.</p>
format thesis
qualification_name
qualification_level Master's degree
author Vanitha Paranjotii
author_facet Vanitha Paranjotii
author_sort Vanitha Paranjotii
title Analisis ciri-ciri klasikisme dalam Purananuru dengan menggunakan teori Sevviyal
title_short Analisis ciri-ciri klasikisme dalam Purananuru dengan menggunakan teori Sevviyal
title_full Analisis ciri-ciri klasikisme dalam Purananuru dengan menggunakan teori Sevviyal
title_fullStr Analisis ciri-ciri klasikisme dalam Purananuru dengan menggunakan teori Sevviyal
title_full_unstemmed Analisis ciri-ciri klasikisme dalam Purananuru dengan menggunakan teori Sevviyal
title_sort analisis ciri-ciri klasikisme dalam purananuru dengan menggunakan teori sevviyal
granting_institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
granting_department Fakulti Bahasa dan Komunikasi
publishDate 2021
url https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=9747
_version_ 1794025738216669184
spelling oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:97472023-12-08 Analisis ciri-ciri klasikisme dalam Purananuru dengan menggunakan teori Sevviyal 2021 Vanitha Paranjotii PL Languages and literatures of Eastern Asia, Africa, Oceania <p>This study examines the features of classicism in the work of Purananuru. The</p><p>objective of this study is to identify the characteristics of classicism, analyze the</p><p>characteristics of classicism and explain the uniqueness of the characteristics of</p><p>classicism in the work of Purananuru. This study is based on eight features of</p><p>classicism. This study uses source data taken from 400 poems found in the work of</p><p>Purananuru. The analysis and discussion are made based on the Sevviyal Theory</p><p>pioneered by Manavai Mustafa. This study uses a qualitative method that includes</p><p>textual and descriptive analysis studies. The results show that Purananuru has eight</p><p>sevviyal aspects namely thonmai, thanithanmai, pothupanpu, nadunilamai,</p><p>panpaaddu kalai paddarivu velipadu, ilakkiya valam, uyarsinthanai and kalai ilakkiya</p><p>thanithanmai velippadu pangkalippu. The findings of the study show that, the</p><p>elements of classicism found in Purananuru can be divided into eight sevviyal</p><p>features and the sevviyal features abundant in the works of Purananuru are</p><p>pothupanpu, panpaaddu kalai paddarivu velipadu and uyarsinthanai. The findings of</p><p>the study also prove that the eight sevviyal features recorded in Purananuru can</p><p>explain the uniqueness of its classicism. The results of this study will be a guideline to</p><p>the younger generation to identify and understand the characteristics of sevviyal</p><p>behavior found in classical Tamil literary texts. This framework can also be applied</p><p>by other researchers using our local Tamil literary texts.</p> 2021 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=9747 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=9747 text tam closedAccess Masters Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Bahasa dan Komunikasi <p>, .(1997). </p><p></p><p></p><p>.</p><p>: </p><p>.</p><p></p><p>, . (2007). </p><p></p><p>. : </p><p></p><p>.</p><p></p><p>, . (2019). </p><p>. : </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>, E-ISSN : 2581-7140</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>, .</p><p>(2011). </p><p></p><p></p><p>. </p><p></p><p>, </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>.</p><p></p><p>, . (2008). </p><p></p><p></p><p>.</p><p>:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>.</p><p></p><p>, . (2011). </p><p></p><p>. : </p><p>.</p><p></p><p>, .(2006). </p><p></p><p>.</p><p></p><p></p><p>, </p><p></p><p>.</p><p></p><p></p><p>, . (2000). </p><p>.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>, </p><p>.</p><p></p><p>, . (2006). </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>. </p><p></p><p>, </p><p>.</p><p></p><p>, . (1999). </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>, </p><p>.</p><p></p><p>, . (2010). </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>.</p><p></p><p></p><p>, </p><p>.</p><p></p><p>, .(2007). </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>. </p><p></p><p>, </p><p>.</p><p></p><p>, . (2014). </p><p>. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>,</p><p></p><p>, , . (2005). </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>. : </p><p></p><p>.</p><p></p><p>, , . (2005). </p><p></p><p>. : </p><p></p><p>.</p><p></p><p>, . (2011). </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>. </p><p></p><p>, </p><p>.</p><p></p><p>, . (2009). </p><p></p><p></p><p>.</p><p></p><p></p><p>, </p><p>.</p><p></p><p>, . (2018).</p><p>. : </p><p>.</p><p></p><p></p><p>. (2012). </p><p>. , </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>, </p><p></p><p>, </p><p></p><p>,</p><p>.</p><p></p><p>, . (2010). </p><p></p><p></p><p>. : </p><p></p><p>.</p><p></p><p>, . (2008). </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>.</p><p></p><p></p><p>, </p><p>.</p><p></p><p>, . (2019). </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>.</p><p></p><p>: </p><p></p><p>.</p><p></p><p>, . (2010). </p><p></p><p>.</p><p></p><p></p><p>, </p><p>.</p><p></p><p>, . (2010). </p><p>. : </p><p></p><p>.</p><p></p><p></p><p>.(2012). </p><p></p><p>. :</p><p>.</p><p></p><p>, . (2011).</p><p></p><p></p><p>. : </p><p></p><p></p><p>.</p><p></p><p>, . (2005). </p><p></p><p></p><p>.</p><p></p><p></p><p>, </p><p>.</p><p></p><p></p><p>, . (2021). </p><p></p><p>. :</p><p>, ISSN : 1481-2991</p><p></p><p></p><p>, . (2003). </p><p>. : , </p><p>.</p><p></p><p>, .(2004). </p><p></p><p>. : </p><p></p><p>.</p><p></p><p>, . (2010). </p><p></p><p></p><p>. </p><p></p><p>,</p><p></p><p>.</p><p></p><p></p><p>.(2012). </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>.</p><p>: </p><p></p><p>.</p><p></p><p>, .(2002). </p><p></p><p></p><p>.</p><p></p><p></p><p>, </p><p>.</p><p></p><p>, .(2008). </p><p>. : </p><p>.</p><p></p><p>. (2000). </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>. :</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>,(2013). </p><p>. :</p><p></p><p></p><p>.</p><p></p><p>, .</p><p>(2007). </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>.</p><p></p><p></p><p>,</p><p></p><p>.</p><p></p><p></p><p>, . (2001). </p><p>. :</p><p></p><p>.</p><p></p><p>. (2005). </p><p></p><p>. :</p><p></p><p>.</p><p></p><p></p><p>, . (2009). </p><p>. :</p><p></p><p>.</p><p></p><p>, . (2004). </p><p></p><p>.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>,</p><p></p><p>.</p><p></p><p></p><p>. . . (2001). </p><p>. :</p><p></p><p>.</p><p></p><p>, . (1989). </p><p></p><p>. :</p><p>: </p><p>.</p><p></p><p>, . (1991). </p><p></p><p></p><p>. :</p><p></p><p>.</p><p></p><p>, . (2012). </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>.</p><p>: </p><p>.</p><p></p><p>, . (1959).</p><p></p><p></p><p>. :</p><p></p><p>.</p><p></p><p>, . (1976). </p><p>. : </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>.</p><p></p><p>, . (2006). </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>.</p><p></p><p></p><p>,(2010). </p><p>. : </p><p></p><p>.</p><p></p><p></p><p>,(2004).</p><p></p><p></p><p>. :</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>.</p><p></p><p></p><p>, (2007). </p><p></p><p>. : </p><p></p><p>.</p><p></p><p>, . (2010). </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>. </p><p></p><p>,</p><p></p><p>.</p><p></p><p>, . (2004). </p><p>. :</p><p></p><p>.</p><p></p><p>, . (1998). </p><p></p><p>. :</p><p></p><p>.</p><p></p><p>, .(2003). </p><p></p><p>. :</p><p></p><p>.</p><p></p><p></p><p>, .(2014). </p><p></p><p>. </p><p></p><p>,</p><p></p><p>.</p><p></p><p>, .</p><p>(2003). </p><p></p><p>.</p><p></p><p></p><p>,</p><p></p><p>.</p><p></p><p>, . (2006). </p><p></p><p>. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>.</p><p></p><p>, . (2009). </p><p></p><p>.</p><p>:</p><p></p><p></p><p>.</p><p></p><p>, . (2019). </p><p></p><p></p><p>.</p><p>, ISSN : 2554-3993</p><p></p><p></p><p>, . (1972). </p><p></p><p>. : </p><p>.</p><p></p><p>, . (2006). </p><p></p><p>. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>.</p><p></p><p>, . (2009). </p><p>. </p><p></p><p>,</p><p></p><p>.</p><p></p><p></p><p>, . (2012). </p><p></p><p></p><p>.</p><p></p><p></p><p>, </p><p>.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>(2011). </p><p></p><p></p><p>.</p><p>: </p><p>.</p><p></p><p>RUJUKAN</p><p>BAHASA MELAYU</p><p></p><p></p><p>Jobrohian. (2001). Sosiologi Sastera: Beberapa Konsep Penghantar</p><p>Methodologi, Yogyakarta:Hanindita.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Mana Sakina. (1998). Kiritikan Sastera Moden, Teori dan Pendekatan. Shah Alam:</p><p>Penerbit Fajar Bakti Sdn . Bhd.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Othman Lebar. (2009). Peneyelidikan Kualitatif: Pengenalan KepadaTeori Dan</p><p>Metod.Perak: UPSI.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Othman Lebar. (2015). Penyelidikan Kulitatif: Pengenalan Kepada</p><p>Teori</p><p>dan metode.</p><p>Perak:Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.</p><p></p><p>Umar Junus. (1986). Konsep Dan Pendekatan Sastera.Kuala</p><p>Lumpur:</p><p>Dewan Bahasa</p><p>Dan Pustaka.</p><p></p><p></p><p>RUJUKAN</p><p>BAHASA</p><p>INGGERIS</p><p></p><p></p><p>Gay,L.R, (1996). Educational Research New Jersey: Merill. Englewood Cliff</p><p></p><p></p><p></p>

Similar Items