Tahap Pengetahuan Pedagogi Isi Kandungan dalam kalangan guru sains komputer di negeri Perak

<p>Kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengenalpasti tahap Pengetahuan Pedagogi Isi Kandungan</p><p>(PCK) bagi guru Sains Komputer. Pengetahuan Pedagogi Isi Kandungan adalah</p><p>hubungan diantara Pengetahuan Pedagogi (PK) dan Pengetahuan...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kumaraveloo Terpari@Thirupathy
Format: thesis
Language:zsm
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=9806
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:9806
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
collection UPSI Digital Repository
language zsm
topic T Technology
spellingShingle T Technology
Kumaraveloo Terpari@Thirupathy
Tahap Pengetahuan Pedagogi Isi Kandungan dalam kalangan guru sains komputer di negeri Perak
description <p>Kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengenalpasti tahap Pengetahuan Pedagogi Isi Kandungan</p><p>(PCK) bagi guru Sains Komputer. Pengetahuan Pedagogi Isi Kandungan adalah</p><p>hubungan diantara Pengetahuan Pedagogi (PK) dan Pengetahuan Isi Kandungan (CK).</p><p>Model yang digunakan adalah berasaskan kepada model PCK Shulman. Rekabentuk</p><p>kuantitatif yang digunakan dalam kajian ini adalah kaedah tinjauan. Seramai 78 orang</p><p>guru Sains Komputer dipilih secara rawak dari 62 buah sekolah. Instrumen soalan</p><p>selidik yang telah disahkan oleh lima orang pakar telah diedarkan dalam talian yang</p><p>mengandungi 50 item dan mempunyai nilai kebolehpercayaan Alpha Cronbach, =</p><p>.98. Data kajian ini dianalisis menggunakan statistik deskriptif dan inferensi yang</p><p>melibatkan ujian Anova,Ujian-t dan juga Korelasi Pearson. Hasil kajian menunjukkan</p><p>tahap Pengetahuan Pedagogi (M = 3.78, SP = .68), tahap Pengetahuan Isi Kandungan</p><p>(M = 3.96, SP = .82) dan tahap Pengetahuan Pedagogi Isi Kandungan (M = 3.75, SP</p><p>= .67) guru Sains Komputer pada tahap tinggi. Hasil ujian statistik inferensi</p><p>menunjukkan tidak ada perbezaan signifikan antara PCK, CK, dan PK dengan jantina</p><p>dan pengalaman. Namun begitu terdapat hubungan positif dan kuat antara PK dengan</p><p>PCK (r = .84) dan CK dengan PCK (r = .80). Kesimpulannya, dapatan menunjukkan</p><p>bahawa tahap pengetahuan pedagogi isi kandungan dalam kalangan guru Sains</p><p>Komputer berada pada tahap yang tinggi. Implikasi kajian ini dapat menyokong guru</p><p>Sains Komputer untuk penguasaan pedagogi isi kandungan dalam pendidikan abad ke-</p><p>21.</p>
format thesis
qualification_name
qualification_level Master's degree
author Kumaraveloo Terpari@Thirupathy
author_facet Kumaraveloo Terpari@Thirupathy
author_sort Kumaraveloo Terpari@Thirupathy
title Tahap Pengetahuan Pedagogi Isi Kandungan dalam kalangan guru sains komputer di negeri Perak
title_short Tahap Pengetahuan Pedagogi Isi Kandungan dalam kalangan guru sains komputer di negeri Perak
title_full Tahap Pengetahuan Pedagogi Isi Kandungan dalam kalangan guru sains komputer di negeri Perak
title_fullStr Tahap Pengetahuan Pedagogi Isi Kandungan dalam kalangan guru sains komputer di negeri Perak
title_full_unstemmed Tahap Pengetahuan Pedagogi Isi Kandungan dalam kalangan guru sains komputer di negeri Perak
title_sort tahap pengetahuan pedagogi isi kandungan dalam kalangan guru sains komputer di negeri perak
granting_institution Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
granting_department Fakulti Seni, Komputeran dan Industri Kreatif
publishDate 2022
url https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=9806
_version_ 1794025751848157184
spelling oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:98062024-01-23 Tahap Pengetahuan Pedagogi Isi Kandungan dalam kalangan guru sains komputer di negeri Perak 2022 Kumaraveloo Terpari@Thirupathy T Technology <p>Kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengenalpasti tahap Pengetahuan Pedagogi Isi Kandungan</p><p>(PCK) bagi guru Sains Komputer. Pengetahuan Pedagogi Isi Kandungan adalah</p><p>hubungan diantara Pengetahuan Pedagogi (PK) dan Pengetahuan Isi Kandungan (CK).</p><p>Model yang digunakan adalah berasaskan kepada model PCK Shulman. Rekabentuk</p><p>kuantitatif yang digunakan dalam kajian ini adalah kaedah tinjauan. Seramai 78 orang</p><p>guru Sains Komputer dipilih secara rawak dari 62 buah sekolah. Instrumen soalan</p><p>selidik yang telah disahkan oleh lima orang pakar telah diedarkan dalam talian yang</p><p>mengandungi 50 item dan mempunyai nilai kebolehpercayaan Alpha Cronbach, =</p><p>.98. Data kajian ini dianalisis menggunakan statistik deskriptif dan inferensi yang</p><p>melibatkan ujian Anova,Ujian-t dan juga Korelasi Pearson. Hasil kajian menunjukkan</p><p>tahap Pengetahuan Pedagogi (M = 3.78, SP = .68), tahap Pengetahuan Isi Kandungan</p><p>(M = 3.96, SP = .82) dan tahap Pengetahuan Pedagogi Isi Kandungan (M = 3.75, SP</p><p>= .67) guru Sains Komputer pada tahap tinggi. Hasil ujian statistik inferensi</p><p>menunjukkan tidak ada perbezaan signifikan antara PCK, CK, dan PK dengan jantina</p><p>dan pengalaman. Namun begitu terdapat hubungan positif dan kuat antara PK dengan</p><p>PCK (r = .84) dan CK dengan PCK (r = .80). Kesimpulannya, dapatan menunjukkan</p><p>bahawa tahap pengetahuan pedagogi isi kandungan dalam kalangan guru Sains</p><p>Komputer berada pada tahap yang tinggi. Implikasi kajian ini dapat menyokong guru</p><p>Sains Komputer untuk penguasaan pedagogi isi kandungan dalam pendidikan abad ke-</p><p>21.</p> 2022 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=9806 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=9806 text zsm closedAccess Masters Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Seni, Komputeran dan Industri Kreatif <p>Abdul, H. Abdullah., Mahani Mokhtar, Noor Dayana, A. Halim, Dayana, F. Ali, Lokman, M. Tahir. & Umar, H. A, Kohar. (2017). Mathematics Teachers Level of Knowledge and Practice on the Implementation of Higher-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS). EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 1305-8215, 3-17.</p><p>Ahgilan Perumal. (2019). Reka Bentuk Dan Penilaian Modul Pembelajaran Pengaturcaraan Peringkat Sekolah Menengah Menggunakan Pembelajaran Berasas Kompetensi (PBK).(Tesis Sarjana Tidak Diterbitkan).Bangi, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia</p><p>Ahmad Zamzuri, M. A., (2016). Coding in schools. Keynote address at 10th International Malaysian Educational Technology Conference. 28 30</p><p>Ahmad Zamzuri, M. A., (2018). Interviz: A hardware-software interfacing visualization kit for absolute beginners learn coding. Paper presented at professorial lecture. 7 August 2018, Tanjong Malim, Malaysia</p><p>Alammary A. (2019). Blended Learning Model for Introductory Programming Courses: A Systematic Literature Review. PLoS ONE. 14(19): e0221765.</p><p>Ala-mutka, K., & Lahtinen, E. (2005). A Study of the Difficulties of Novice Programmers. Proceedings of the 10th annual SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education (ITiCSE) (Vol. 37, pp.1418). https://doi.org/10.1145/1151954.1067453</p><p>Bati, T. B., Gelderblom, H., & van Biljon, J. (2014). A blended learning approach for teaching computer programming: design for large classes in Sub-Saharan Africa. Computer Science Education, 24(1), 7199. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2014.897850</p><p>Bennedsen, J., & Caspersen, M. E. (2007). Failure Rates in Introductory Programming. The SIGCSE Bulletin, 39(2), 3236.</p><p>Berliner, D. C. (1994). Expertise: The wonder of exemplary performances. In J. N. Mangieri & C. Collins (Eds.), Creating powerful thinking in teachers and students: Diverse perspective (pp. 161186).</p><p>Biju, S. M. (2013a). Difficulties in understanding object-oriented programming concepts. Innovations and Advances in Computer, Information, Systems Sciences, and Engineering (pp. 319326).</p><p>Biju, S. M. (2013b). Taking Advantage of Alice to Teach Programming Concepts. E Learning and Digital Media, 10(1), 2229.</p><p>Borko, H & Putnam, R. T. (1996). Learning to Teach. In D.C Berliner & R.C Calfee (Eds.). Handbook of Educational Psychology. (pp. 673-708).</p><p>Chee, J., Mariani, M. N., Othman, A. J., & Nor Mashitah, M. R. (2017). Understanding the content pedagogical knowledge among preschool teachers and application of developmentally appropriate practices in teaching. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2017.03.023.</p><p>Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.</p><p>Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.</p><p>Creswell, J. W. (2016). Educational Research: Pearson New International Edition: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (4th ed) Boston: Pearson Education Limited.</p><p>Danisman, S., & Tanisli, D. (2017). Examination of Mathematics Teachers Educational Sciences, 5(2), 1634. Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Probability. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(2), 16-34. http://libproxy.library.wmich.edu/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docvi ew/1913352728?accountid=15099</p><p>Dina, N. Z., Wuryanto, E. & Marjianto, R. S. (2019). Evaluation on the effectiveness of visual learning environment on programming course from students perspectives. IIUM Engineering Journal 20(1): 100107. http://doi:10.31436/iiumej.v20i1.993.</p><p>Doukakis, S., Giannakos, M. N., & Koilias, C. (2013). Measuring Students Acceptance and Confidence in Algorithms and Programming: The Impact of Engagement with CS on Greek Secondary Education. Informatics in Education,12(2), 207219.</p><p>du Boulay, B. (1989). Some difficulties of learning to program. In E. Soloway & J.C. Spohrer (Eds.), Studying the novice programmer. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.</p><p>Dunican, E. (2002). Making The Analogy: Alternative Delivery Techniques for First Year Programming Courses. In 14th Workshop of the Psychology of Programming Interest Group (pp. 8999). London. Dicapai daripada http://www.ppig.org/papers/14th-dunican.pdf</p><p>Eliasson, J., Westin, L., & Nordstrom, M. (2006). Investigating students confidence In 257 programming and problem solving. Proceedings Frontiers in Education Conference (pp. 2227). https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2006.322490</p><p>Enstr, E. (2013). Dynamic programming structure, difficulties and teaching. IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), (pp 1857-1863). https://doi.org/doi:10.1109/FIE.2013.6685158</p><p>Erdogan, A., & Sahin, I. (2010). Relationship between math teacher candidates" technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) and achievement levels. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 27072711. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.400</p><p>Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: Sage.</p><p>Gal-ezer, J., & Zur, E. (2013). What (else) should CS Educators Know? Revisited. Proceedings of the 8th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education (WiPSCE) (pp. 8386). Aarhus, Denmark. https://doi.org/10.1145/2532748.2532757</p><p>Gall, M.D., Gall, J.P., & Borg, W.R. (2003). Educational Research: An Introduction (7th ed). New York, NY: Allyn and Bacon.</p><p>George, D., & Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference, 17.0 update (10a ed.) Boston: Pearson.</p><p>Gerjk, I. (2017). Image processing algorithms in the secondary. Acta Didactica Napocensia,10(3), 69-76.</p><p>Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). Pedagogical Content Knowledge: An Introduction and Orientation. In PCK and Science Education (pp. 317).</p><p>Ghazali Darusalam dan Sufean Hussin. (2016). Metodologi Penyelidikan Dalam Pendidikan: Amalan Dan Analisis Kajian. Penerbit Universiti Malaya.</p><p>Giraffa, L. M. M., Moraes, M. C., & Uden, L. (2014). Teaching Object-Oriented Programming in First Year Undergraduate Courses Supported By Virtual Classroom. In L. Uden, Y.-H. Tao, H.-C. Yang, & I.-H. Ting (Eds.), Springer Proceedings in Complexity (pp. 1526).</p><p>Gomes, A. J., (2014). A teachers view about introductory programming teaching and learning: difficulties, strategies and motivations. 44th Annual Frontiers in Education (FIE) Conference. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2014.7044086</p><p>Gomes, A. J., Santos, A. N., & Mendes, A. J., (2012). A study on students behaviours and attitudes towards learning to program. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education ITiCSE 12 (p. 132). https://doi.org/10.1145/2325296.2325331</p><p>Govender, I. (2006). Learning to Program, Learning to Teach Programming: Pre- and In-service Teachers Experiences of an Object-oriented Language. University of South Africa.</p><p>Govender, I., & Govender, D. W. (2012). A constructivist approach to a programming course: Students responses to the use of a Learning Management System. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(2), 238252. https://doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2012.10740742</p><p>Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of the teacher: teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press</p><p>Hair, J., F., Black, W., C., Babin, B., J., Anderson, R., E., & Tatham R., L. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.</p><p>Harimurti, R., Ekohariadi, Munoto, B, I. G. P. A., & Winanti, E. T. (2019). Analysis of Programming Skills Concept in Developing Problem Solving Skills. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Dan Kejuruteran, 25(1), 4351. https://doi.org/10.21831/jptk.v25i1.22638</p><p>Hashweh, M. Z. (2005). Teacher pedagogical constructions: A reconfiguration of pedagogical content knowledge. Teachers and Teaching, 11(3), 273292.</p><p>Helyawati Baharudin, Shakirah Mohd Sofi & Farhana Abdullah Aushaimi. (2018). Cabaran dan Isu dalam Penawaran Subjek Sains Komputer di Sekolah Menengah. International Research Management & Innovation Conference 2018, 1-6)</p><p>Hlas, A. & Hildebrandf, S. (2010). Demonstrations of pedagogical content knowledge: Spanish Liberal Arts and Spanish Education majors writing. L2 Journal, 2 (2010),1-22.</p><p>Hofuku, Y., Cho, S., Nishida, T., & Kanemune, S. (2009). Why is programming difficult ?. International Conference on Informatics in Schools: Situation, Evolution and Perspectives (ISSEP 13) (pp. 1324). Oldenburg, Germany</p><p>Holland, S., Griffiths, R., & Woodman, M. (1997). Avoiding Object Misconceptions. Proceedings of the 28th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 131134). San Jose, California, USA: ACM.</p><p>Holmboe, C., Mciver, L., & George, C. (1998). Research Agenda for Computer Science Education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 673-695</p><p>Irwan Nadzif Maphul (2011). The Prevalence of Work-Family Conflict Among Mothers in Peninsular Malaysia. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 154-161.</p><p>Jahidih Saili.(2015). Pengetahuan Pedagogi Kandungan (PCK) pengajaran tajwid al- Quran dalam kalangan guru Kelas Khas Kemahiran Membaca dan Menghafaz al-Quran (KKQ) di Lembah Klang. [Tesis Doktor Falsafah Tidak Diterbitkan. UPSI, Tanjung Malim].</p><p>Jamilah Hassan. (2016). Kesediaan guru bahasa Melayu dalam pengajaran karangan berpandukan Pembelajaran Berasaskan Masalah. [Tesis Sarjana Tidak Diterbitkan. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia].</p><p>Jang, S. J., & Tsai, M. F. (2013). Exploring the TPACK of Taiwanese secondary school science teachers using a new contextualized TPACK model. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(4), 566580.</p><p>Jenkins, T. (2002). On The Difficulty Of Learning To Program. In 3rd Annual LTSNICS Conference (pp. 5358).https://doi.org/10.1.1.596.9994</p><p>Jonassen, D. H., & Grabowski, B. L.(2012) Handbook Of Individual Differences Learning, And Instruction: Routledge.</p><p>Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (1998). Sukatan Pelajaran Teknologi Maklumat KBSM. Kuala Lumpur : Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum.</p><p>Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2006). Sukatan Pelajaran Information and Communication Technology KBSM. Kuala Lumpur : Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum.</p><p>Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2016). Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran Sains Komputer Tingkatan 5 KSSM. Kuala Lumpur : Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum.</p><p>Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2016a). Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran Asas Sains Komputer Tingkatan 1 KSSM. Kuala Lumpur : Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum.</p><p>Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2017). Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran Asas Sains Komputer Tingkatan 3 KSSM. Kuala Lumpur : Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum.</p><p>Kessler, C. ., & Anderson. (1989). Learning flow of control: Recursive and iterative procedures. In E. Soloway & J.C. Spohrer (Eds.), Studying the novice programmer. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.</p><p>Khairunnisa Abd Hamid & Anuar Ahmad. (2017). Tahap Pengetahuan Pedagogi Isi Kandungan bagi Guru Sejarah di Sekolah Menengah. Prosiding Seminar on Transdisiplin Education (STEd 2017). 528-540.</p><p>Khusnul, H., & Mohd. Helmi, A.R. (2017). Penggunaan Media Sosial dan Faktor- Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Terbentuknya Gerakan Sosial oleh Pemimpin Pelajar Universiti di Bandar Pekan Baru, Riau, Indonesia. Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 12(2), 87-101.</p><p>Killen, R. (2005). Programming and Assessment for Quality Teaching and Learning. (1st ed.). Thomson. Social Science Press.</p><p>Koehler, M., Greenhalgh, S., Rosenberg, J., & Keenan, S. (2017). What the tech is going on with teachers? Digital teaching portfolios? Using the TPACK framework to analyze teacher? Technological understanding. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 25(1), 31-59. http://learntechlib.org/p/173346.</p><p>Koh, J. H. L., & Chai, C. S. (2014). Teacher clusters and their perceptions of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) development through ICT lesson design. Computers & Education, 70(1), 222232. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.08.017</p><p>Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., & Tsait, C. (2010). Examining the technological pedagogical content knowledge of Singapore pre-service teachers with a large-scale survey. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 563573.</p><p>Klling, M. (1999). The Problem of teaching Object-Oriented Programming, Part 1: Languages. Journal of Object-Oriented Programming, 11(8), 815.</p><p>Kreber, C., & Cranton, P. A. (2000). Teaching as scholarship. The Journal of Higher Education, 71(4), 476495.</p><p>Landell K. (1997). Management by Menu. London: Wiley dan Sons Inc.</p><p>Lapidot, T., & Hazzan, O. (2003). Methods of Teaching a Computer Science Course for Prospective Teachers. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 35(4), 29-34.</p><p>Lin, T.-C., Tsai, C.-C., Chai, C. S., & Lee, M.-H. (2013). Identifying science teachers" perceptions of technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK). Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(3), 325336. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-012-9396-6</p><p>Magdeline, N., & Zamri, M. (2016). Pengetahuan Pedagogi Kandungan Guru Bahasa Iban. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.</p><p>Margaritis, M., Magenheim, J., Hubwieser, P., Berges, M., Ohrndorf, L., & Schubert, S. (2015). Development of a Competency Model for Computer Science Teachers at Secondary School Level. IEEE Global Engineering Education</p><p>Conference (EDUCON) (pp. 211220). https://doi.org/10.1145/2462476.2465607</p><p>Mazaitis, D. (1993). The object-oriented paradigm in the undergraduate curriculum: a survey of implementations and issues. SIGCSE Bulletin, (25), 58 643.</p><p>McGetrik, A., Borle, R., Ibbett, R., Liyod, J., Lovegrove, G., & Mander, K., 2005. Grand challenges in computing: Education- A Summary. The Computer Journal, 48(1), 42-48. doi:10.1093/comjnl/bxh064</p><p>Mohd Faizal Nizam Lee, A., & Wei, L. T. (2017). Kesahan dan Kebolehpercayaan instrumen penilaian kendiri pembelajaran Geometri Tingkatan Satu. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 14(1), 211-265</p><p>Mohd Sahandri Gani, H., Noor Shah, S., Saifuddin Kumar, A., Mazura Mastura, M., & Husni Zaim, K.N. (2014). Transformation of Research Instrument Development in Education. US-China Education Review, 4(10), 679-687.</p><p>Mohd Yusof, Y. ., & Zakaria, E. (2015). The Integration of Teachers Pedagogical Content Knowledge Components in Teaching Linear Equation. International Education Studies, 8(11), 2633. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n11p26</p><p>Mow, I. T. C. (2008). Issues and Difficulties in Teaching Novice Computer Programming. In Innovative Techniques in Instruction Technology, E- learning, Eassessment, and Education (pp. 199204).</p><p>Muhamad Hafizan & Anuar Ahmad. (2017). Pengaruh pengetahuan isi kandungan terhadap aplikasi pengajaran yang berkesan dalam kalangan guru-guru sejarah. International Conference on Global Education (pp 2457 2474).</p><p>Muhamad Yazid Khalil. (2018). Tahap pengetahuan guru sejarah sekolah rendah dalam kemahiran pemikiran sejarah. Prosiding National Innovation and Invention Competition Through Exhibition (iCompEx18)</p><p>Nor Masharah Husain. (2017). Model Kompetensi Guru Pengaturcaraan Berasaskan Sistem Pendidikan di Malaysia. [Tesis PhD yang tidak diterbitkan. Tanjong Malim : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris</p><p>Noraini Idris. (2013). Penyelidikan dalam pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: McGraw-Hill Education.</p><p>Norhafiza, M. S., & Ku Azam,T.L.( 2017). Penglibatan Komuniti Tempatan dalam Keusahawanan Pelancongan: Kajian Kes Pulau Perhentian, Malaysia. Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS), 3(1), 103-119.</p><p>Norraihan Rosman & Jamilah Hamid. (2020). Penguasaan Konsep Pengaturcaraan Melalui Pembelajaran Teradun: Satu Kajian Kes. Journal of ICT in Education (JICTIE) ISSN 2289-7844, 7(1), 52-57.</p><p>Nurahimah Mohd Yusoff & Rafisah Osman. (2010). Hubungan kualiti penyeliaan pengajaran dan pembelajaran di bilik darjah dengan efikasi guru. Asia Pasific Journal of Educators and Education, Vol. 25, 53-71, 2010.</p><p>Nurmelda Patric & Roslinda Rosli. (2020). Pengetahuan pedagogi dan isi kandungan guru opsyen Matematik dalam pengajaran Topik Pecahan. Jurnal Dunia Pendidikan, 2(1): 92-101.</p><p>Nurul Nashrah Salehudin, Noor Hasimah Hassan dan Nur Aida Abdul Hamid. (2015). Matematik dan kemahiran abad ke - 21: Perspektif pelajar. Mathematic Education Journal, 3(1), 24 -36.</p><p>Ong Sze Chong, Zamri Mahamod & Mohd Izham Mohd Hamzah. (2017). Meneroka kaedah pengajaran guru cemerlang bahasa Melayu negeri Sarawak: Satu kajian kes. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu, 7(1): 93-108.</p><p>qvist, M. & Nouri, J. (2018). Coding by hand or on the computer? Evaluating the effect of accessment mode on the performance of students learning programming. Journal of Computers in Education, 5(2), 199-219.</p><p>Pamuk, S., Ergun, M., Cakir, R., Yilmas, H. B., & Ayas, C. (2013). Exploring relationships among TPACK components and development of the TPACK instrument. Education and Information Technologies, 18(1), 1-19.</p><p>Rice, A. H., & Kitchel, T. (2016). Influence of knowledge of content and students on beginning agriculure teachers" approaches to teaching content. Journal of Agricultural Education, 57(4), 86100.</p><p>Rice, A. H., & Kitchel, T. (2017). Shaping Pedagogical Content Knowledge for Experienced Agriculture Teachers in the Plant Sciences: A Grounded Theory. Journal of Agricultural Education, 58(4), 5064</p><p>Rohaan, E. J., Taconis, R., & Jochems, W. M. G. (2012). Analysing teacher knowledge for technology education in primary schools. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 22, 271280. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-010-9147-z</p><p>Rolandsson, L. (2010). Tell me about Pedagogy in programming! International Computing Education Research (ICER 10) (p. 2010).</p><p>Rountree, N., Rountree, J., & Robins, A. (2003). Identifying the danger zones: Predictors success and failure in a CS1 course. Inroads (the SIGCSE Bulletin), 34, 121124.</p><p>Rozaiman Makmun, Zamri Mahamod, Noor Izam Mohd Taib, & A. Rahman Haron. (2016). Pengetahuan Teknologi Pedagogikal Kandungan Kesusasteraan Melayu: Peranan Guru Sastera dalam SPN 21. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu, 1(2): 85-98.</p><p>Rozita Radhiah Said, Abdul Rasid Jamian & Azhar Md. Sabil. (2016). Pengetahuan dan kefahaman skop pengajaran dan pembelajaran bahasa Melayu dalam kalangan Jurulatih Pakar Pembangunan Sekolah (SISC+). International Journal of Education and Training, 2: 1-9.</p><p>Sabitha Marican. (2006). Penyelidikan sains sosial: Pendekatan pragmatik. Kuala Lumpur : Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.</p><p>Saeli, M. (2012). Teaching Programming for Secondary School : A Pedagogical Content Knowledge Based Approach. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven.</p><p>Saeli, M., Perrenet, J., Jochems, W. M. G., & Zwaneveld, B. (2011). Teaching Programming in Secondary School : A Pedagogical Content Knowledge Perspective. Informatics in Education, 10(1), 7388.</p><p>Saeli, M., Perrenet, J., Jochems, W. M. G., & Zwaneveld, B. (2012a). Portray the Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Programming: The technical report.</p><p>Saeli, M., Perrenet, J., Jochems, W. M. G., & Zwaneveld, B. (2012b). Programming : Teachers and Pedagogical Content Knowledge in the Netherlands. Informatics in Education, 11(1), 81114.</p><p>Saemah Rahman & Zamri Mahamod. (2017). Inovasi Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka</p><p>Schempp, P. G., Manross, D., Tan, S. K. S., & Fincher, M. D. (1998). Subject expertise and teachers" knowledge. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 17, 342356.</p><p>Scherer, R. J. (2016). The quest for comparability: studying the invariance of the teachers sense of self efficacy (TSES) measure across countries. PLoS One. https://doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0150829</p><p>Schulte, C. (2013). Reflections on the role of Programming in Primary and Secondary Computing Education. Dalam Proceedings of the 8th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education (WiPSE) (pp. 1724). https://doi.org/10.1145/2532748.2532754</p><p>Shafinaz, A. M., Chua, Y.P., Hussein, A., Leong, M. W., & Shahrin, A. (2016). Kecerdasan Emosi Pengetua dan Hubungannya dengan Efikasi Kendiri Guru Sekolah Menengah. Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 3(3), 54-75.</p><p>Sharifah Hasima, S. D., Jamal @ Nordin, Y., & Hamidah, Y. (2017). Kesahan dan Kebolehpercayaan Instrumen Kajian Penyeliaan Berkesan. Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 5(3), 50-61. Retrieved from http://juku.um.edu.my/index.php/JUKU /article/view/8227</p><p>Shulman, L. S. (1987) Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform. Harvad Educational Review, 57(1): 1 -22.</p><p>Shulman, L.S (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4 14.</p><p>Siti Sakinah Mohd Yusof. (2017). Keberkesanan Penggunaan Alat Bantu Mengajar Interaktif bagi Meningkatkan Kefahaman Konsep Pengaturcaraan dalam Kalangan Pelajar [Tesis PhD yang tidak diterbitkan. Tanjong Malim : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris</p><p>Siti Zaimar Wahid, Azizah Safie, & Norhaliza Idris. (2017). Tinjauan Tahap Kefahaman Pelajar Terhadap Konsep Asas Dalam Bahasa Pengaturcaraan Java di Politeknik Balik Pulau. Jurnal Kejuruteraan, Teknologi dan Sains Sosial. 1(1), 218 225.</p><p>Soloway, E., & Bonar, J. (1985). Pre-programming Knowledge: A Major Source of Misconceptions in Novice Programmers. Human-Computer Interaction,1, 133 161.</p><p>Sorva, J., (2013). Notional machines and introductory programming education. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 13(2), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1145/2483710.2483713</p><p>Suyanto, S. (2017). A Reflection on the Implementation of a New Curriculum in Indonesia: A Crucial Problem on School Readiness. In The 4th International Conference on Research, Implementation, and Education of Mathematics and Science (Vol. 100008, pp. 19). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4995218</p><p>Szlvi, P., & Zsak, L. (2006). Programming Versus Application. Proceedings of the 2006 International Conference on Informatics in Secondary Schools Evolution and Perspectives: The Bridge between Using and Understanding Computers, 4858.</p><p>Tabachnick, G. B., & Fidell, S. L. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). New York: Pearson Educational Inc.</p><p>Tajudin, N. A. M., Chinnappan, M., & Saad, N. S. (2017). Relationship between mathematics teacher subject matter knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge and professional development needs. AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1847, No. 1, p. 030001).</p><p>Teh Faradilla, A. R., Zaid Mujaiyid Putra, A. B., & Juliana, J. (2013). Learning Introductory C Programming : Relevant Exercises Based On Student Difficulties Factors. Dalam International and National Conference on Engineering Education (INCEE 11) (pp. 16).</p><p>Tengku Zawawi Tengku Zainal (2004). Pengetahuan Pedagogi Isi Kandungan Bagi Tajuk Pecahan di Kalangan Guru Matematik Sekolah Rendah. [Tesis Doktor Falsafah Tidak Diterbitkan. Bangi, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia</p><p>Tom, M. (2015). Five C Framework : A student-centered approach for teaching 266 programming courses to students with diverse disciplinary background. Journal of Learning Design, 8(1), 2137.</p><p>Tth, P. (2014). The role of individual differences in learning. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 11(4): 183-197</p><p>Tuckman, B.W. & Waheed, M.A.(1981). Evaluating An Individualized Science Programme For Community College Student. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 18: 489-495</p><p>Turnuklu, E. & Yesildere, S. (2007). The pedagogical content knowledge in mathematics: Preservice primary Math teachers perspectives. IUMPS: The Journal, Vol. 1, 1-13.</p><p>Van Driel, J., Verloop, N., & De Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers" pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 673695.</p><p>Wan Idros, W.S., Nur Farhah, O., & Maizatul Haizan, M. (2017). Hubungan Pengkomunikasian Budaya Organisasi dengan Prestasi Kerja Kakitangan Pelaksana Sektor Awam. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 12(3).</p><p>Wan Mohd Zaifurin, W.N., Nor Hayati, S., Sabri, A., & Ibrahim, M. (2015). Penggunaan Analisa Faktor bagi Kajian Hubungan antara Faktor-faktor Peramal dengan Kecenderungan Pelajar Menceburi Kerjaya Keusahawanan. International Journal of Business and Technopreneurship, 5(2), 293-306.</p><p>Wiseman, D. L., Cooner, D. D. & Knight, S. L. (1999). Becoming a teacher in a field based setting an introduction to education and classroom. Amerika: Wadsworth Publishing Company.</p><p>Wong, W.S. & Kamisah Osman. (2018). Pembelajaran Berasaskan Permainan dalam Pendidikan STEM dan Penguasaan Kemahiran Abad ke-21. Politeknik & Kolej Komuniti Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, (3).</p><p></p><p>Yadav, A., Gretter, S., Hambrusch, S., & Sands, P. (2017). Expanding computer science education in schools: Understanding teaching experinces and challenges. Computer Science Education, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2016.1257418</p><p>Yagci, M. (2016). Blended learning experience in a programming language course and the effect of the thinking styles of the students on success and motivation. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 15(4), 32-45.</p><p>Zulkpli, Z., Mohamed, M., & Abdullah, A. H. (2017). Assessing mathematics teachers knowledge in teaching thinking skills. Sains Humanika, 9(1-4).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p>