Development and usability of the Fountain of Phase (FOP) Model for the concept of matter in teaching and learning Chemistry
<p>This study aims to develop a concrete model, the Fountain of Phase model, for the concept</p><p>of matters and determine the usability of the FOP model. The design of this study is a</p><p>development study based on the ADDIE m...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | thesis |
| Language: | eng |
| Published: |
2023
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=9837 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| id |
oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:9837 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
uketd_dc |
| institution |
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| collection |
UPSI Digital Repository |
| language |
eng |
| topic |
QD Chemistry |
| spellingShingle |
QD Chemistry Faezatul Alwani Mohd Rahim Development and usability of the Fountain of Phase (FOP) Model for the concept of matter in teaching and learning Chemistry |
| description |
<p>This study aims to develop a concrete model, the Fountain of Phase model, for the concept</p><p>of matters and determine the usability of the FOP model. The design of this study is a</p><p>development study based on the ADDIE model. A need analysis was administered to</p><p>fourteen (14) chemistry teachers across PPD Muallim, Perak, to assess the need for using</p><p>the concrete model as a teaching aid in science and chemistry education. Two validated</p><p>instruments used in this study are the models validity questionnaire (MVQ) and the</p><p>models usability questionnaire (MUQ). The MUQ was adapted from the questionnaire</p><p>Usefulness, Satisfaction, and Ease of Use (USE) by Lund in 2001. The model was</p><p>evaluated by five (5) experts from Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris (UPSI), including</p><p>subject matter experts, lecturers in the field of chemical education, and lecturers with at</p><p>least three (3) years of experience in teaching aid development. The FOP model had</p><p>obtained a 0.99 Content Validity Index (CVI) value, which was considered good. The</p><p>results showed a high percentage of agreement, exceeding 85%. Besides, the first users</p><p>feedback was administered to seven (7) chemistry teachers in Hulu Selangor and Hulu</p><p>Perak. A high mean was found for usefulness (M=6.19; SD=0.84), ease of use (M=5.77;</p><p>SD=1.32), ease of learning (M=5.82; SD=1.36) and satisfaction (M=5.94; SD=1.13). As a</p><p>conclusion, this study has developed a valid and usable FOP model. The implications of</p><p>this study imply that the FOP model could be used as an alternative teaching aid to teach</p><p>the concept of matter.</p> |
| format |
thesis |
| qualification_name |
|
| qualification_level |
Master's degree |
| author |
Faezatul Alwani Mohd Rahim |
| author_facet |
Faezatul Alwani Mohd Rahim |
| author_sort |
Faezatul Alwani Mohd Rahim |
| title |
Development and usability of the Fountain of Phase (FOP) Model for the concept of matter in teaching and learning Chemistry |
| title_short |
Development and usability of the Fountain of Phase (FOP) Model for the concept of matter in teaching and learning Chemistry |
| title_full |
Development and usability of the Fountain of Phase (FOP) Model for the concept of matter in teaching and learning Chemistry |
| title_fullStr |
Development and usability of the Fountain of Phase (FOP) Model for the concept of matter in teaching and learning Chemistry |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Development and usability of the Fountain of Phase (FOP) Model for the concept of matter in teaching and learning Chemistry |
| title_sort |
development and usability of the fountain of phase (fop) model for the concept of matter in teaching and learning chemistry |
| granting_institution |
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| granting_department |
Fakulti Sains dan Matematik |
| publishDate |
2023 |
| url |
https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=9837 |
| _version_ |
1794025760102547456 |
| spelling |
oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:98372024-02-21 Development and usability of the Fountain of Phase (FOP) Model for the concept of matter in teaching and learning Chemistry 2023 Faezatul Alwani Mohd Rahim QD Chemistry <p>This study aims to develop a concrete model, the Fountain of Phase model, for the concept</p><p>of matters and determine the usability of the FOP model. The design of this study is a</p><p>development study based on the ADDIE model. A need analysis was administered to</p><p>fourteen (14) chemistry teachers across PPD Muallim, Perak, to assess the need for using</p><p>the concrete model as a teaching aid in science and chemistry education. Two validated</p><p>instruments used in this study are the models validity questionnaire (MVQ) and the</p><p>models usability questionnaire (MUQ). The MUQ was adapted from the questionnaire</p><p>Usefulness, Satisfaction, and Ease of Use (USE) by Lund in 2001. The model was</p><p>evaluated by five (5) experts from Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris (UPSI), including</p><p>subject matter experts, lecturers in the field of chemical education, and lecturers with at</p><p>least three (3) years of experience in teaching aid development. The FOP model had</p><p>obtained a 0.99 Content Validity Index (CVI) value, which was considered good. The</p><p>results showed a high percentage of agreement, exceeding 85%. Besides, the first users</p><p>feedback was administered to seven (7) chemistry teachers in Hulu Selangor and Hulu</p><p>Perak. A high mean was found for usefulness (M=6.19; SD=0.84), ease of use (M=5.77;</p><p>SD=1.32), ease of learning (M=5.82; SD=1.36) and satisfaction (M=5.94; SD=1.13). As a</p><p>conclusion, this study has developed a valid and usable FOP model. The implications of</p><p>this study imply that the FOP model could be used as an alternative teaching aid to teach</p><p>the concept of matter.</p> 2023 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=9837 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=9837 text eng closedAccess Masters Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Sains dan Matematik <p>Adebayo, O. & Adigun, S. (2018). Impact Of Instructional Aids On Students Academic Performance In Physics In Secondary Schools In Federal Capital Territory (FCT) Abuja, Nigeria. European Scientific Journal February 2018 edition, 14(4), 1857 7881.</p><p>Aguilar, R. L. (2016, December 22). Scientists discover a new state of matter for water. The Conversation. https://phys.org/news/2016-12-scientists-state.html</p><p>Akaygun, S., & Jones, L. L. (2014). Words or Pictures: A comparison of written and pictorial explanations of physical and chemical equilibria. International Journal of Science Education, 36(5), 783807.</p><p>Alex, C., Andre, S. & Esther, P. (2017). Estimating Sample Size for Usability Testing. Enfoque Ute Ingenieria General, 8(1), 1390-9363.</p><p>Ali, M., Dalhar, M., & Norida. (2010). Koswer Pembelajaran Kendiri Bagi Tajuk Jirim Tingkatan Empat Berasaskan Teori Kognitif. Fakulti Pendidikan. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, pp. 1-8.</p><p>Almanasreh, E., Moles, R., & Chen, T. (2018). Evaluation of methods used for estimating content validity. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 3(66), 1551-7411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.03.066</p><p>Alroobaea, R. & Mayhew, P. (2014, August 27-29). How many participants are really enough for usability studies?. Science and Information Conference (SAI), London, UK. https://bit.ly/3uVaplY</p><p>Ary, D., Jacob, L., Sorensen, C., & Walker, D. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education (8th) , Belmonte.</p><p>Ashikin, R. (2006). Perisian Pembelajaran Berbantukan Komputer Bab Jirim (Matter) Dalam Matapelajaran Sains KBSM Tingkatan Satu. (Tesis sarjana yang tidak diterbitkan). Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Putra Malaysia.</p><p>Bajracharya, R. M., Manalo, A. C., Kamnaseha, W. & Lau, K-t. (2014). An Overview of Mechanical Properties and Durability of Glass-Fibre Reinforced Recycled Mixed Plastic Waste Composites. Material and Design, 62(1), 98-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.04.081</p><p>Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice-Hall.</p><p>Bevan, N., Carter, J., Earthy, J., Geis, T., & Harker, S. (2016). New ISO Standards for Usability, Usability Reports and Usability Measures. Human-Computer Interaction. Theory, Design, Development and Practice, 9731, 268278. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39510-4_25</p><p>Bridle, C. A., & Yezierski, E. J. (2012). Evidence for the Effectiveness of Inquiry-Based, Particulate-Level Instruction on Conceptions of the Particulate Nature of Matter. Journal of Chemical Education, 89(2), 192198.</p><p>Broman, K., Bernholt, S., & Parchmann, I. (2018). Using model-based scaffolds to support students solving context-based chemistry problems. International Journal of Science Education, 40(10), 11761197.</p><p>Brooke, J. (1996). SUS A Quick and Dirty Usability Scale. Usability Evaluation in Industry, 189(194), 4 7.</p><p>Castillo, M.(2013). The ScientificMethod : ANeed forSomethingBetter?. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 34(9), 1669 1671.</p><p>Chang, H., & Tzeng, S. (2017). Investigating Taiwanese Students Visualization Competence of Matter at the Particulate Level. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 16, 12071226.</p><p>Christensen, A. &Johnson, M. (2012). Research on the Treatment of Couple Distress. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 38(1), 145168.</p><p>Christopher K., & Villarreal, S. (2015). Using animations in identifying general chemistry students misconceptions and evaluating their knowledge transfer relating to particle position in physical changes. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(2), 273282.</p><p>Chua, Y. P. (2006). Kaedah dan Statistik Penyelidikan: Kaedah Penyelidikan Buku 1. Kuala Lumpur : McGraw-Hill.</p><p>Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Revised Edition. A subsidiary of Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.</p><p>Creswell, J. W. (2009). Mapping the field of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 2009, 3(2), 95 108.</p><p>Daniel, T. & Rangis, I. (2018). Effectiveness of Audio-Visual Aids In Teaching Lower SecondaryScience In Rural SecondarySchool, Asia Pacific Journal Of Eduucation, 32, 91-106.</p><p>Darnawati, Jamiludin, Mursidin & Yuniar, N. (2016). Learning Through Media Development Model Application Assure. IOSR Journal of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS), 21(11), 2279-0845.</p><p>Data, A., Moratmand, N. & Oakley, G. (2015). The Design and Implementation of an Educational Multimedia Mathematics Software: Using ADDIE to Guide Instructional System Design. The Journal of Applied Instructional Design, 4(1), 2160-5289.</p><p>Dewey, J. (1998). How We Think. Boston, MA:Houghton Mifflin Company.</p><p>Dikerich, L. (2015). Applying Modelling Instruction to High School Chemistry to Improve students Conceptual Understanding. American Chemical Society and Division of Chemical Education, 92, 1315-1319.</p><p>Dokumen Standard Kurikulum Dan Pentaksiran (DSKP) Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Menengah Kimia (KSSM) Tingkatan 4 & 5 (Edisi Bahasa Inggeris). Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.</p><p>Domingos, C., Costa, P. S., Santos, N.C., &Pgo, J. M. (2021). European Portuguese Version of the User Satisfaction Evaluation Questionnaire (USEQ): Transcultural Adaptation and Validation Study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 9(6), 19245.</p><p>Etikan, I., Musa, S. & Alkassim, R. (2016). Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1 -4.</p><p>Fareez Azman. (2021, 12 January). Sesi persekolahan di negeri PKP, PKPB, PKPP ? Ini yang anda perlu tahu. Astro Awani Online. Article accessed on 2 February 2022, from https://www.astroawani.com/berita-malaysia/sesi-persekolahan-di</p><p>negeri-pkp-pkpb-pkpp-ini-yang-anda-perlu-tahu-277382</p><p>Farida, I., Helsy, I., Fitriani, I. & Ramdhani, M. (2017, August 24). Learning Material of Chemistry in High School Using Multiple Representation. The 2nd Annual Applied Science and Engineering Conference, Bandung, Indonesia. https://bit.ly/3obdN8A</p><p>Fernandez-Batanero, J. M., Roman-Gravan, P., Reyes-Rebollo, M. M., & Montenegro-Rueda, M. (2021). Impact of Educational Technologyon Teacher Stress and Anxiety: A Literature Review. International Journal of Environmental Researchand Public Health, 18(2), 548. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020548</p><p>Gao, M., Kortum, P. & Oswald, Fr. (2018).Psychometric Evaluation of the USE (Usefulness, Satisfaction, and Ease of use) Questionnaire for Reliability and Validity. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 62(1), 14141418.</p><p>Geyer, M. (2016). Using Interlocking Toy Building Blocks To Assess Conceptual UnderstandingIn Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(2), 202205.</p><p>Guzel, B. & Adadan, E. (2013). Use of Multiple Representations in Developing Preservice Chemistry teachers understanding of the structure of matter. International Journal of Environment & Science Education, 8(1), 109-130.</p><p>Hadenfeldt, J., Liu, X. & Neumann, K. (2015). Framing students progression in understanding matter: a review of previous research. Studies in Science Education. 50(2), 181208.</p><p>Hadinugrahaningsih, T., Rahmawati, Y., & Ridwan, A. (2017, May 15-16). Developing 21st century skills in chemistry classrooms: Opportunities and challenges of STEAM integration. The 4th International Conference on Research, Implementation, and Education of Mathematics and Science (4th ICRIEMS), Yogyakarta,Indonesia. https://bit.ly/3PaSdNc</p><p>Hameed, S. Rwayyih, R. & Raheem, A. (2019). An ASSURE-Model Instructional Design Based on Active LearningStrategies and its Effect for 1st Intermediate Student's Higher Order Thinking Skills in Teaching Science Text Book. Psihologija. 52(5), 339-349.</p><p>Hanzah, N., Mohamad, S. & Taib, N. (2019). Pembangunan dan Penggunaan Ohmic Wheel Sebagai Bahan Bantu Mengajar, Journal on Technical dan Vocational Education, 4(1), 31 42.</p><p>Harinie, L., Sudiro, A., Rahayu, M., & Fatchan, A. (2017). Study of the Banduras Social Cognitive LearningTheoryfor The Entrepreneurship Learning Process. Social Sciences. 6(1), 1-6.</p><p>Harpe, Spencer E. (2015). Howto analyze Likert and otherratingscale data. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 7(6), 836850.</p><p>Harrison, A. & Treagust, D. (1996). Secondary students mental models of atoms and molecules: Implications for teaching chemistry. Science Education, 80(5), 509534.</p><p>Heale, R., & Twycross, A. (2015). Validity and reliability in quantitative studies. Evidence Based Nursing, 18(3), 6667.</p><p>Hess, A. & Greer, K. (2016). Designing for Engagement: Using the ADDIE Model to Integrate High-Impact Practices into an Online Information Literacy Course. Communication In Information Literacy, 10(2), 264-282.</p><p>Hogue, L., Blake, B., & Sarquis, J. L. (2007). Classifying Matter: A Physical Model Using Paper Clips. Journal of Chemical Education, 83(9), 1317.</p><p>Hsiung, W. Y. (2018). The Use of E-Resources and Innovative Technology in Transforming Traditional Teaching in Chemistry and its Impact on Learning Chemistry. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (IJIM), 12(7), 86.</p><p>Ibrahim, N., Surif, J., Hui, K., & Yaakob, S. (2013). Typical teaching method applied in chemistry experiment. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4946 4954.</p><p>Ibrahm, D. & Harun, A. (2020). Behaviour of Gas Simulator: Using Smartphones to Learn Submicroscopic Level Chemistry. Jurnal Dunia Pendidikan, 2(2), 110122.</p><p>Ivanescu, A. E., Li, P., George, B., Brown, A. W., Keith, S. W., Raju, D., & Allison,</p><p>D. B. (2015). The importance of prediction model validation and assessment in obesityand nutrition research. International Journal of Obesity, 40(6),887 894.</p><p>Johnstone, A. (1991). Why is Science Difficult to Learn? Things are Seldom What They Seem. Journal of Computer Assisted Instruction, 7, 75-83.</p><p>Jones, L. & Kelly, R. (2015). Visualization: The Key to Understanding Chemistry Concepts. ACS Symposium Series eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2015</p><p>1208.ch008</p><p>Jessica, C., & Saronom, S. (2021). Development of Sets-Based Chemistry Teaching Materials and Student Responses To Teaching Materials on Hydrocarbon Materials, Journal Scientia, 11(1), 2301 0059.</p><p>Kamba, A., Libata, I., & Usman, A. (2019). Lack of Availabilityof Science Teaching Facilities on Students Teaching and Learning Science in Some Selected Secondary Schools in Kebbi State. Journal of Advances in Education and Philosophy, 253, 2523 2665.</p><p>Kapur, S. (2018). Module : Teaching Aids: Non-conventional and Modern. MHRD Govt. of India.</p><p>Kara, S., & Kingir, S. (2021). Implementation of the Model-Based Science Writing Heuristic Approach in Elementary School Science. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20, 683-703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10191-0</p><p>Kaufman, D., Almomen, R., Alotaibi, H., Al-Rowais, N., Albeik, M. & Albattal, S. (2016). Applying the ADDIEAnalysis, Design, Development, Implementation and Evaluation Instructional Design Model to Continuing Professional Development for Primary Care Physicians in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Clinical Medicine, 7, 538-546.</p><p>Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2012). Spesifikasi Kurikulum Kimia KBSM Tingkatan 4. Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum, Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.</p><p>Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2012). Spesifikasi Kurikulum Kimia KBSM Tingkatan 4, 5. Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum, Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.</p><p>Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2012). Spesifikasi Kurikulum Sains KBSM Tingkatan 1, 2, 3, 4. Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum, Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.</p><p>Kim, D., & Downey, S. (2016). Examining the Use of the ASSURE Model by K12 Teachers. Computers in the Schools, 33(3), 153168.</p><p>Kirakowski, J., & Cierlik, B. (1998). Measuring the Usability of Web Sites. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 42(4), 424 -428.</p><p>Koopman, O. (2017). Investigating How Science Teachers in South Africa Engage with all Three Levels of Representation in Selected ChemistryTopics. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Edition, 21(1), 15-25.</p><p>Kumar, B. A., & Goundar, M. (2019). Usability heuristics for mobile learning applications. Education and Information Technologies, 24(1), 1819-1833. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09860-z</p><p>Lewis, J. (1995). IBM Computer UsabilitySatisfaction Questionnaires : Psychometric Evaluation and Instructions for Use. International Journal of Human-Computer Interacton, 7(1), 57 -78.</p><p>Li, J., Lee, J., Huang, W., Burchesky, S., Shteynas, B., Top, F., et al (2017). A stripe phase with supersolid properties in spinorbit-coupled BoseEinstein condensates. Nature, 543(7643), 9194.</p><p>Li, W., Arshad, Y. (2014). Wait-Time and Multiple Representation Levels in ChemistryLessons, The Malaysian Online Journal of Education, 2(2), 45-53.</p><p>Lindagaard, G. & Chattratichart, J (2007, March 15-17). Usability Testing : What Have We Overlooked?. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Maryland, United States. https://bit.ly/3yJcz9r</p><p>Lund, A.M. (2001). Measuring usability with the USE questionnaire. Usability Interface, 8(2), 3 6.</p><p>Maarten, W., Peter, R., Henny, P & Ton, J (1998). Advances In Learning And Instruction Series : Learning With Multiple Representations. Elsevier Science Ltd.</p><p>Montessori, M. (1946). Education For A New World. Madras:Kalakshreta Publications.</p><p>Muzijah, R., Wati, M. & Mahtari, S. (2020). Pengembangan E-modul Menggunakan Aplikasi Exe-Learninguntuk Melatih Literasi Sains. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika. 4(2), 2549-9963.</p><p>Nandkumar, N. (2014). Plasma The Fourth State Of Matter. International Journal Of Scientific & Technology Research, 3(9), 2277-8616.</p><p>Nasohah, U., Gani, M., & Shaid, M. (2015, May 26-27). Model ADDIE dalam Proses Rekabentuk Modul Pengajaran : Bahasa Arab Tujuan Khas di Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia Sebagai Contoh. Proceedings of the International Seminar on Language Teaching IseLT, Padang, Indonesia.</p><p>https://bit.ly/3PAx9Q8</p><p>Nielsen, J. & Landauer, T. (1993, April 24-29). A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, Amsterdam, Netherlands. https://bit.ly/3co9eFi</p><p>Official Portal Ministry of Education Malaysia. (n.d.). Curriculum Development Division. http://bpk.moe.gov.my/index.php/terbitan-bpk/kurikulum-sekolah</p><p>rendah</p><p>Orgill, M. (2013). How Effective Is the Use of Analogies in Science Textbooks?. Critical Analysis of Science Textbooks. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978</p><p>94-007-4168-3_5</p><p>Othman,T., Azraai, O., & Dani, I. (2015). Pandangan Guru Terhadap Tahap Kesukaran Tajuk-Tajuk Kimia. Jurnal Kempimpinan Pendidikan, 2, 32-46.</p><p>https://bit.ly/3RG4pHC</p><p>Pawar, E. (2016). A Review Article for Acrylic PMMA. IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, 13(2), 2778-1684.</p><p>Pfizer Global Environment, Health, and Safety. (2021, December 5). Safety Data Sheet (SDS) Product Name : Carbon Dioxide (Dry Ice). United States.</p><p>https://bit.ly/3PpHXjY</p><p>Piaget, J. (1959). The Language and Thought of the Child. London : Routledge and Kegan.</p><p>Polit, D. F. & Beck, C. T. (2006). The Content Validity Index : Are You Sure Whats Being Reported? Critique and Recommendations. Research In Nursing Heath, 29(5), 489-97.</p><p>Purwiandono, G. (2017). Development of Computational-based Visualization Method in Physical Chemistry Practical Course. International Journal of Science and Applied Science : Conference Series. 2 (1), 2549-4635.</p><p>Quatrini,H.C., Pena, S. B., Lopes, J., Lopes, C. T. & Bottura, A. L. (2016). Experts for Validation Studies in Nursing: New Proposal and Selection Criteria. International Journal of Nursing Knowledge, 27(3), 130 135.</p><p>Rau, M. A. (2016). Conditions for the Effectiveness of Multiple Visual Representations in Enhancing STEM Learning. Educational Psychology Review, 29(4), 717761.</p><p>Rohana, W. (2007). Pembangunan Bahan Bantu Mengajar Menerusi Animasi Berkomputer Bagi Tajuk Jirim, Kimia Tingkatan Empat. (Tesis sarjana yang tidak diterbitkan). Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.</p><p>Rosenthal, P., Sanger, M. (2013). How Does Viewing One Computer Animation Affect Students Interpretations of Another Animation Depicting the Same OxidationReduction Reaction?. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract, 14, 286296.</p><p>Saleh, S. & Ahmad, H. (2015). The Understanding of The Basic Concept of Matter And Particle. Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education, 30, 89104.</p><p>Salbiah Mohamed Salleh @ Salleh, Jamil Ahmad, Mohd Aderi Che Noh & Adibah Abdul Latif. (2019). Teknik Pelaporan Indeks Kesahan Kandungan (CVI) dalam kajian sains sosial. Dalam Mohd Awang Idris. Mohd Sobhi Ishak Azanin Ahmad & Aszunarni Ayob (Pnyt.) Penyelidikan Sains Sosial : Aplikasi teori dan metodologi. (ms. 7-20). Kuala Lumpur : Penerbit Universiti Malaya.</p><p>Santos, V. & Arroio, A. (2016). The Representational Levels: Influences and Contributions To Research in Chemical Education. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 13(1), 3-18.</p><p>Shaharudin, A., Rosly & Wan, A. (2012). Pembangunan Sistem Multikamera Dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Fizik. Laporan Penyelidikan UPSI.</p><p>Shehu, G. (2015). Two Ideas of Redox Reaction: Misconceptions and Their Challeges in Chemistry Education. Journal of Research & Method in Education, 5(1), 23207388.</p><p>Shibley, I., Amaral, K., Shank, J., & Lisa, S. (2011). Designing a Blended Course: Using ADDIE to Guide Instructional Design. Journal of College Science Teaching, 40(6), 8085.</p><p>Sketsun, A. (2018). Principles of Nature. Journal of Modern Physics, 9, 320-334.</p><p>Slapnicar, M., Devetak, I., Glazar, S & Pavlin. J. (2017). Identification Of The Understanding Of The States Of Matter Of Water And Air Among Slovenien Students Aged 12, 14 Amd 16 Years Through Solving Authenthic Tasks. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(3), 308-323. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/17.16.308</p><p>Suchanek, P. & Kralova, M. (2019). Customer Satisfaction, Loyalty, Knowledge and Competiveness in the Industry. Economic Research, 32(1), 1237 1255.</p><p>Taherdoost, H. (2016). Validity and Reliability of the Research Instrument; How to Test the Validation of a Questionnaire/Survey in a Research. SSRN Electronic Journal, 5(3), 28-36. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205040</p><p>Talib, C. A., Aliyu, H., Malik, A. M. A., Siang, K. H., & Ali, M. (2018, November 89). Interactive Courseware as an effective strategy to overcome misconceptions in Acid-base Chemistry. IEEE 10th International Conference</p><p>https://bit.ly/3OeYNRm</p><p>Tan, T. & Aisyah, J. (2009). Chemistry for Matriculation Semester 1 Second Edition Updated. Selangor, Malaysia : Penerbitan Oxford Fajar.</p><p>Thayban, T., Habiddin, H. & Utomo, Y. (2020). Concrete Model VS Virtual Model: Roles and Implications in Chemistry Learning. Jurnal Pembelajaran Kimia, 5(2), 90 107.</p><p>Tio, M., Aiyub, Z., Brown, W., Foote, C., Masterton, W., et al. (2013). Chemistry for Matriculation. Selangor, Malaysia : CengageLearning.</p><p>Treagust, D., Chittleborough, G. & Mamiala, T. (2010). The Role of submicroscpic and symbolic representations in chemical explainations. International Journal of Science, 25(11), 1353-1368.</p><p>Treagust, D. & Harrison, G. (1996). Secondary students mental models of atoms and molecules : Implications for teaching chemistry. Science Education, 80(5), 509-534.</p><p>Tsaparlis, G., Pappa, E. T., & Byers, B. (2018). Teaching and learning chemical bonding: research-based evidence for misconceptions and conceptual difficulties experienced by students in upper secondary schools and the effect of an enriched text. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(4), 12531269.</p><p>Usta, N. & Gunetepe, E. (2017). Pre-Service Teachers Material Development Process Based on the ADDIE Model: E-book Design. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(12), 2324-8068.</p><p>Utusan Malaysia Online (2016, May 23). Kurikulum Sekolah Malaysia Diberi Nafas Baru. Malaysia. http://www.utusan.com.my/pendidikan/kurikulum-sekolah</p><p>malaysia-diberi-nafas-baharu-1.187760</p><p>Vygotsky, L. (1962). Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.</p><p>Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA : Harvard UniversityPress.</p><p>Wei, S., Liu, X., Wang, Z., & Wang, X. (2012). Using Rasch Measurement To Develop a Computer Modeling-Based Instrument To Assess Students Conceptual Understanding of Matter. Journal of Chemical Education, 89(3), 335-345.</p><p>Widiyatmoko, A. & Nurmasitah, S. (2015). Designing Simple Technology as a Science Teaching Aids from Used Materials. Journal of Environmentally Friendly Processes, I(4), 2328-1383.</p><p>Yaseen, Z. & Aubusson, P. (2018). Exploring Student-Generated Animations, Combined with a Representational Pedagogy, as a Tool for Learning in Chemistry. Res Sci Educ, 50, 529-548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018</p><p>9700-4</p><p>Yennita,. Afni, N., Kazmi, T., Azizahwati & Fakhruddin. (2019, October 12). The Need Analysis Developing STEM Embedded Project. Proceeding of the SS9 & 3rd URICES,Pekanbaru, Indonesia. https://bit.ly/3O8MMND</p><p>Yusoff, M. S. B. (2019). ABC of Content Validation and Content Validity Calculation. Education in Medicine Journal, 11(2), 49-54.</p><p>Zhou, L., Bao, J., Setiawan, M. A., Saptona, A. & Parmanto, B. (2019). The mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ): Development and Validation Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth , 7(4), 11500.</p><p></p> |