Quantification of standardised uptake value for ¹⁸F-FDG positron emission tomography in Malaysia
The role of Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) modalities is becoming more important concomitantly with the increase of oncology cases in Malaysia. Thus, it is the perfect time to perform a study to standardise the PET/CT image quality in Malaysia. This study aimed to compa...
محفوظ في:
| المؤلف الرئيسي: | |
|---|---|
| التنسيق: | أطروحة |
| اللغة: | English |
| منشور في: |
2017
|
| الموضوعات: | |
| الوصول للمادة أونلاين: | http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/68328/1/FPSK%28m%29%202018%208%20IR.pdf |
| الوسوم: |
إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
|
| الملخص: | The role of Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT)
modalities is becoming more important concomitantly with the increase of
oncology cases in Malaysia. Thus, it is the perfect time to perform a study to
standardise the PET/CT image quality in Malaysia. This study aimed to compare
the quantification of image quality of PET/CT with a standardised uptake value
(SUV) parameter. In general, this study was carried out with the purpose of
identifying the standardisation of quantification of standardised uptake value,
SUVcontrolled for 18F-FDG PET between two independent PET modalities at two
different institutions.
The analysis was done on the SUVcontrolled of technical techniques (PET phantom)
as a control standard for the validation of the PET-CT images of selected subjects
with Fasting Blood Glucose index as the adjusted index to synchronise the two
independent data sets. It was found that the SUVcontrolled was a potential
conversion marker to validate the in vivo standardisation techniques for the two
independent PET/CT modality systems based on the reference standard of the
matched FBS and the in vitro 18F-FDG phantom. This study confirmed that the
two independent PET modalities at paired-centre could potentially be
standardised on the independent image quality based on the SUVmax
quantification as the two independent measured were insignificantly different. |
|---|