Macroprolactinemia among hyperprolactinemia patients in Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia
Background: HyperPRL is the most common hypothalamic-pituitary disorder encountered in clinical endocrinology. Macroprolactinemia is a known benign cause of hyperPRL. Macroprolactin is a non-bioactive form of PRL, composed of monomeric PRL and Immunoglobulin G antibodies. The prevalence of macrop...
Saved in:
| 主要作者: | |
|---|---|
| 格式: | Thesis |
| 语言: | English |
| 出版: |
2015
|
| 主题: | |
| 在线阅读: | http://eprints.usm.my/40634/1/Dr._Noor_Azlin_Azraini_Che_Soh%40Yusof-24_pages.pdf |
| 标签: |
添加标签
没有标签, 成为第一个标记此记录!
|
| 总结: | Background: HyperPRL is the most common hypothalamic-pituitary disorder
encountered in clinical endocrinology. Macroprolactinemia is a known benign cause of
hyperPRL. Macroprolactin is a non-bioactive form of PRL, composed of monomeric
PRL and Immunoglobulin G antibodies. The prevalence of macroprolactinemia is
increasing in endocrinology practice. It is important to differentiate between
macroprolactinemia and hyperPRL as macroprolactinemia does not require any
treatment. However the clinical symptoms are could not differentiate between these two
conditions.
Aim: To determine the prevalence of macroprolactinemia and significant clinical
features associated with macroprolactinemia among hyperPRL patient in HUSM.
Design: A cross sectional study was conducted in 2013 involving patients diagnosed as
hyperPRL in HUSM from 2011 to 2013. Serum from these patient were measured for
PRL using cobas e411 (sandwich principle) and the same serum were treated with
polyethylene glycol (PEG) 8000 to differentiate true hyperPRL and
macroprolactinemia. PRL recovery of less than 40% indicates of presence
macroprolactin.
Results: A total of 133 hyperPRL patients, 120 (90%) female and 13 (9.8%) male aged
between 18 to 68 years old with mean (SD) age of 34.37 (11.75) years old were
included in this study. Nine patients (all female) were found to have macroprolactinemia [prevalence=6.8% (95% CI: 2.4%, 11.1%)]. There were no significant association between clinical symptoms and diagnosis of macroprolactinemia in this study.
Conclusion: The prevalence of macroprolactinemia detected using PEG 8000 among
patients diagnosed as hyperPRL was low. Screening for macroprolactin using PEG
8000 showed that majority of patients presented with hyperPRL in HUSM were true
hyperPRL. Clinical symptoms alone therefore, could not distinguish between hyperPRL
and macroprolactinemia.
|
|---|