Pemikiran Sukarno di sebalik konfrontasi Indonesia 1959-1965: Suatu tinjauan psikologi politik

Confrontation was one of the major policies employed by the Indonesian government under the direct command of President Sukarno against Malaysia from 1959 to 1965 which affected Indonesia domestically and internationally. Indonesian’s Confrontation policy was synonym with Sukarno because he was in f...

全面介绍

Saved in:

书目详细资料
主要作者:	Purnama, Chandra
格式:	Thesis
语言:	eng eng
出版:	2015
主题:	DS Asia JA Political science (General)
在线阅读:	https://etd.uum.edu.my/5309/1/s90790.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/5309/2/s90790_abstract.pdf
标签:	添加标签没有标签, 成为第一个标记此记录!

id	my-uum-etd.5309
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection	UUM ETD
language	eng eng
advisor	Mohd Sani, Mohd Azizuddin
topic	DS Asia JA Political science (General)
spellingShingle	DS Asia JA Political science (General) Purnama, Chandra Pemikiran Sukarno di sebalik konfrontasi Indonesia 1959-1965: Suatu tinjauan psikologi politik
description	Confrontation was one of the major policies employed by the Indonesian government under the direct command of President Sukarno against Malaysia from 1959 to 1965 which affected Indonesia domestically and internationally. Indonesian’s Confrontation policy was synonym with Sukarno because he was in fact the main actor that triggered the policy. Therefore, explanation to the Confrontation should not ignore the role of Sukarno’s thought. This case was parallel to the perspective of political psychology which assumed that human behavior related to what human contemplated. There was no study, however, to understand the Confrontation by Sukarno from the psychological aspects of thinking. Thus the research objectives are to analyze the various aspects of Sukarno’s thought behind the Confrontation that encompass beliefs, perceptions, emotions, and tendencies. Various aspects of Sukarno’s thought was referred to the political psychology perspective on the role of beliefs and perceptions in foreign policy decision-making and the principles of trilogy of minds: cognition, affection and conation. This research utilize qualitative method based on the content analysis of Sukarno’s speeches. Analysis carried out deductively to get themes for categories and inductively to get more themes for the new category. The study finds that in Sukarno’s beliefs, the source of conflicts come from the practices of colonialism, imperialism and neocolonialism by the Netherlands, United States and its allies and the local parties that supported liberalism. Their actions were seen as threats to the independence of Indonesia and evoke Sukarno’s dislike emotion. Sukarno had always urged Indonesia to fight against neocolonialism and imperialism and he didi not hesitate to use military forces if possible. More over, it turns out that Sukarno re-evaluated his own policy in which he admitted to the failure of Confrontation policy. However, he also managed to strengthen Indonesian nation-state and pursued consistently the policy to oppose imperialism and neocolonialism. Thus, Indonesia under Sukarno's confrontation policy can be understood through the psychological aspects of his thinking. The consistency of relationships exists among Sukarno’s psychological aspects and also between his thoughts and his actions
format	Thesis
qualification_name	Ph.D.
qualification_level	Doctorate
author	Purnama, Chandra
author_facet	Purnama, Chandra
author_sort	Purnama, Chandra
title	Pemikiran Sukarno di sebalik konfrontasi Indonesia 1959-1965: Suatu tinjauan psikologi politik
title_short	Pemikiran Sukarno di sebalik konfrontasi Indonesia 1959-1965: Suatu tinjauan psikologi politik
title_full	Pemikiran Sukarno di sebalik konfrontasi Indonesia 1959-1965: Suatu tinjauan psikologi politik
title_fullStr	Pemikiran Sukarno di sebalik konfrontasi Indonesia 1959-1965: Suatu tinjauan psikologi politik
title_full_unstemmed	Pemikiran Sukarno di sebalik konfrontasi Indonesia 1959-1965: Suatu tinjauan psikologi politik
title_sort	pemikiran sukarno di sebalik konfrontasi indonesia 1959-1965: suatu tinjauan psikologi politik
granting_institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department	College of Law, Government and International Studies (COLGIS)
publishDate	2015
url	https://etd.uum.edu.my/5309/1/s90790.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/5309/2/s90790_abstract.pdf
_version_	1747827905305509888
spelling	my-uum-etd.53092021-03-18T08:45:31Z Pemikiran Sukarno di sebalik konfrontasi Indonesia 1959-1965: Suatu tinjauan psikologi politik 2015 Purnama, Chandra Mohd Sani, Mohd Azizuddin College of Law, Government and International Studies (COLGIS) College of Law, Goverment and International Studies (COLGIS) DS Asia JA Political science (General) Confrontation was one of the major policies employed by the Indonesian government under the direct command of President Sukarno against Malaysia from 1959 to 1965 which affected Indonesia domestically and internationally. Indonesian’s Confrontation policy was synonym with Sukarno because he was in fact the main actor that triggered the policy. Therefore, explanation to the Confrontation should not ignore the role of Sukarno’s thought. This case was parallel to the perspective of political psychology which assumed that human behavior related to what human contemplated. There was no study, however, to understand the Confrontation by Sukarno from the psychological aspects of thinking. Thus the research objectives are to analyze the various aspects of Sukarno’s thought behind the Confrontation that encompass beliefs, perceptions, emotions, and tendencies. Various aspects of Sukarno’s thought was referred to the political psychology perspective on the role of beliefs and perceptions in foreign policy decision-making and the principles of trilogy of minds: cognition, affection and conation. This research utilize qualitative method based on the content analysis of Sukarno’s speeches. Analysis carried out deductively to get themes for categories and inductively to get more themes for the new category. The study finds that in Sukarno’s beliefs, the source of conflicts come from the practices of colonialism, imperialism and neocolonialism by the Netherlands, United States and its allies and the local parties that supported liberalism. Their actions were seen as threats to the independence of Indonesia and evoke Sukarno’s dislike emotion. Sukarno had always urged Indonesia to fight against neocolonialism and imperialism and he didi not hesitate to use military forces if possible. More over, it turns out that Sukarno re-evaluated his own policy in which he admitted to the failure of Confrontation policy. However, he also managed to strengthen Indonesian nation-state and pursued consistently the policy to oppose imperialism and neocolonialism. Thus, Indonesia under Sukarno's confrontation policy can be understood through the psychological aspects of his thinking. The consistency of relationships exists among Sukarno’s psychological aspects and also between his thoughts and his actions 2015 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/5309/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/5309/1/s90790.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/5309/2/s90790_abstract.pdf text eng public Ph.D. doctoral Universiti Utara Malaysia BUKU Alam, Wawan T. (2003). Pertentangan Sukarno vs Hatta. Jakarta: Gramedia. Adams, Cindy. (2011). Bung Karno: Penyambung Lidah Rakyat. Jakarta: Gunung Agung. Allison, W. L. (1981). A Critical History of Beliefs System Research in Political Science. (a thesis). The Ohio State University. Allport, F. H. (1955). Theories of Perception and the Concept of Structure. New York: Wiley. Axelrod, Robert (ed). (1976). Structure of Decision: The Cognitive Maps of Political Elites. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Baker, T. L. (1999). Doing Social Research. Boston: McGraw-Hill. Bazeley, Pat. Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. dalam Tashakkori, A., Charles Teddie. (eds). (2002). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, Inc. Berg, B. L. (2004). Qualitative Research Methods for The Social Sciences. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Bunnell, F. P. (1966). Guided Democracy Foreign Policy: 1960-1965 Presiden Sukarno Moves from Non-Alignment to Confrontation. Modern Indonesia Project Cornell University, No. II. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. h. 37-76. Carlson, Neil R. (2010). Psychology. The Science of Behavior. 7th edition. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Cottam, Martha L. (2010). Introduction to Political Psychology. New York: Lawrence Erbaum. Creswell, John W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. L.A: Sage Publications, Inc. Dahm, Bernhard. (1987).Soekarno dan Perjuangan Kemerdekaan. Jakarta: LP3ES. terjemahan oleh Hasan Basari. de Rivera, Joseph. (1968). The Psychological Dimension of Foreign Policy. Columbus, Ohio: Charles Merrill. Finlay,David J. dan Thomas Hovet Jr. (1975) 7304: International Relations on the Planet Earth, New York: Harper and Row. Dermott, Rose. (2007). Political Psychology in International Relations. Michigan: University of Michigan. Dharmawan MM. (2005). Sukarno Bapak Bangsa Indonesia. Bandung: CV Hikayat Dunia. Eagly, Alice H. and Sheley Chaiken. (1993). The Psychology of Attitudes. Forth Worth: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc. Feith, Herbert. Dynamic of Guided Democracy dalam Ruth T. McVey (ed), (1963). Indonesia. New Haven: Yale University. George,Alexander L. (2011). “The Causal Nexus between Cognitive Beliefs and Decision Making Behavior: The Operational Code Beliefs System”. Foreign Policy Analysis Vol. 1. W. Carlsnaes and Stefano Guzzini. London: Sage Publications. hlm. 273-298. Giebels, Lambert. (2001). Soekarno: Biografi 1901-1950. Jakarta: Grasindo. Gilhooly, K. J., M. T. G Keane, R. H. Logie, G. Erdos. (1990). Lines of thinking: Reflections on the Psychology of Thought. New York: John Wiley. Harjono, Anwar, dkk. (eds). (1996). Pemikiran dan Perjuangan Muhammad Natsir. Jakarta: Pustaka Firdaus. Hauswedell, P.C. (1973). Sukarno: Radical or Conservative?. Indonesian Politics 1964-5. Modern Indonesia Project No.15. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Hermann, M. G. “Leader Personality and Foreign Policy Behavior” dalam Comparing Foreign Policies: Theories, Findings and Methods. J. N. Rosenau (ed). (1974). New York: John Wiley and Sons. Holsti, K.J. (1982). Why Nations Realign. Foreign Policy Restructuring in the Postwar World. London: Allen and Unwin. --------------, (1983). International Politics: A Framework for Analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc. Holsti, Ole R. The Beliefs System and National Images, dalam International Politics and Foreign Policy: A Reader in Research and Theory. J. N. Rosenau (ed). (1969). New York: Free Press. Hoopes, Townshend. (1973). The Devil and John Foster Dulles. Boston: Little, Brown. Iin Nur Insaniwati. (2002). Mohamad Roem: Karier Politik dan Perjuangannya (1928-19680). Magelang: IndonesiaTera. Jervis, R. (1976). Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Jones, Howard Palfrey. (1971). Indonesia: the Possible Dream. Singapore: Mas Aju Jost, John T. and Jim Sidanius. ed. (2004). Political Psychology. New York: Psychology Press Kagan, J. dan E. Havemann. (1980). Psychology: An Introductions. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc. hlm. 282. Kahin, Audrey R. and George McT. Kahin. (1995). Subversion as Foreign Policy: The Secret of Eisenhower and Dulles Debacle in Indonesia. New Press. Kapitsa M.S. & Maletin N.P. (2009). Sukarno: Biografi Politik. Bandung: Ultimus. Kaplan, M.A. (1957). Structure and Process in International Politics. New York: Wiley. Kasenda, Peter. (2010). Sukarno Muda: Biografi Pemikiran 1926-1930. Jakarta: Komunitas Bambu. Kirby, Garry R. and Jeffery R. Goodpaster. (1999). Thinking. 2nd edition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Krippendorf, K. (1980). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. New York: Plenum. Legge, John D. (1972).Sukarno: A Political Biography. Sydney Wellington London Boston: Allen & Unwin. Leifer, Michael. (1983). Politik Luar Negeri Indonesia. Jakarta: Gramedia. Lentner, Howard H. (1974). Foreign Policy Analysis. Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merril Publishing Company. Mackie, J.A.C. (1975). Konfrontasi: The Indonesia-Malaysia Dispute 1963-1966. London: Oxford University Press. Mahasin, Aswab dan Ismed Natsir. (eds). (1984). Cendekiawan dan Politik. Jakarta: LP3ES. hlm. xi. Mark, Melvin M. (2000). Evaluation: an Integrated Framework for Understanding, Guiding, and Improving Policies and Programs. San Francsco: Jossey-Bass. Mas'oed, Mohtar (1989). Ekonomi dan Struktur Orde Baru: 1966-1971. Jakarta: LP3ES. McConnell, J.V. (1977). Understanding Human Behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Mingst, Karen A. (2004). Essentials in International Relations. New York: Norton. Mintz, Alex and Karl DeRouen Jr. (2010). Understanding Foreign Policy Decision Making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Nik Mahmud, Nik Anuar. (2000). Konfrontasi Malaysia Indonesia. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Neack, Laura, Jeanne A. K. Hey and Patrick J. Haney. (1991). Foreign Policy Analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. North, R.C., et. al. (1963). Content Analysis. Northwestern University Press. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Pauker, Guy J. (1973). The Indonesian Economic and Political Miracle. The Rand Paper Series: Santa Monica. Pluvier, Jan M. (1966). Confrontation: A Study in Indonesia Politics. London: Oxford University Press. Puvenesvary, M., et.al. (2008). Qualitative Research: Data Collection and Data Analysis Techniques. Sintok: Penerbit University Utara Malaysia. Redfern, William A. (2010). Sukarno’s Guided Democracy and the Takeovers of Foreign Companies in Indonesia in the 1960s. (a dissertation) University of Michigan. Rokeach, Milton. (1968). Beliefs, Attitudes and Values. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass. Rosati, Jerel A. (1987). The Carter Administration's Quest for Global Community: Beliefs and Their Impact on Behavior. Rosati,Jerel A. Cognitive Approaches dalam Foreign Policy Analysis: continuity and change in its second generation. Laura Neack, Jeanne A. K. Hey, Patrick J. Haney. (1995). New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc. hlm. Rosenau, J.N., (ed). (1969). International Politics and Foreign Policy: A Reader in Research and Theory. New York: Free Press. -----------------, (1971). The Scientific Study of Foreign Policy. New York: Free Press. Rosenau, J.N.,Gavin Boyd and Kenneth W. Thompson. (1976). World Politics. New York: Free Press. Simon, Herbert A. (1982). Models of Bounded Rationality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Singer, E., and Valerie Hudson., (ed). (1992). Political Psychology and Foreign Policy. Boulder: Wetview Press. Singleton, Royce.Jr. (1988). Approaches to Social Research. New York: Oxford University Press. Snyder, R. C., H. W. Bruck, and B. Sapin. (1954). Decision-making as an Approach to the Study of International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press. -------------,et. al. (2002). Foreign Policy Decision Making (Revisited). New York: Palgrave-MacMillan. Solso, Robert L., M. Kimberly MacLin and Otto H. MacLin. (2005). Cognitive Psychology. 7th. Ed. Boston: Pearson. Sprout, H. and M. Sprout. (1956). Man-millieu Relationship Hypotheses in the Context of International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Center of International Studies. Steinbruner,John D. (1974). The Cybernetic Theory of Decision. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Suhelmi, Ahmad. (1999). Soekarno Versus Natsir. Darul Falah. Sukarno. (tanpa tahun). Indonesia Menggugat: Pidato Pembelaan Bung Karno di muka Hakim Penjajah. Tanpa tempat dan tanpa nama penerbit. Sukarno. (1964). Dibawah Bendera Revolusi Jilid I. Jakarta: Penerbit Dibawah Bendera Revolusi. ------------, (1965). Dibawah Bendera Revolusi Jilid II. Jakarta: Penerbit Dibawah Bendera Revolusi. ------------, (1986). Amanat Proklamasi I, 1945-1950. Jakarta: Inti Idayu Press-Yayasan Pendidikan Sukarno. ----------------------, Amanat Proklamasi II, 1951-1955 Jakarta: Inti Idayu Press-Yayasan Pendidikan Sukarno. -----------------------, Amanat Proklamasi III, 1956-1960. Jakarta: Inti Idayu Press-Yayasan Pendidikan Sukarno. -----------------------, Amanat Proklamasi IV, 1961-1966. Jakarta: Inti Idayu Press-Yayasan Pendidikan Sukarno. Tashakkori, A., Charles Teddlie. (eds). (2002). Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, Inc. Torgerson, David J. and Celia A. Taylor. “Randomized Controlled Trials and Nonrandomized Design” dalam Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation. Joseph S. Wholey, Harry P. Hatry and Kathryn E. Newcomer. (eds). (2010). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. hlm.144-181. Weber, R. P. (2004). Basic Content Analysis. California: Sage Publications. Weinstein, Frederick B. (1972). The Uses of Foreign Policy in Indonesia. (a dissertation) Cornell University. ---------------(1976). Indonesian Foreign Policy and the Dilemma of Independence. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Widjaja, I Wangsa dan Meutia F. Swasono.(1981). Kumpulan Pidato Mohammad Hatta. Jakarta: Yayasan Idayu. Widjanarko, Bambang. (1988). Sewindu Dekat Bung Karno. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia. Wholey, Joseph S., Harry P. Hatry and Kathryn E. Newcomer. (eds). (2010). Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Zimbardo, P.G. and F.L. Ruch. (1980). Essential of Psychology and Life. Glenview, Illinois: Scott, Foresman and Company. JURNAL Bauer, R. A. “Problem of Perception and the Relations between the United States and Uni Soviet”. Journal of Conflict Resolution. 5. (1961). hlm. 223-229. Bellows, Thomas J. “Sukarno: A Political Biography”. The Journal of Politics. Vol. 35. No. 4 (Nov., 1973). hlm. 1044-1046. Blanton,Shanon Lindsey. “Images in Conflict: The Case of Ronald Reagan and El Salvador”. International Studies Quarterly.40. (1996). hlm. 23-44. Boulding,Kenneth E. “National Images and International Systems”. Journal of Conflict Resolution.3. (1959). hlm. 120-131. Bunnell, Frederick P. “The Twenty Years of Indonesia Foreign Policy, 1945-1965”.The American Political Science Review. Vol. 71. No. 1 (Mar. 1977). hlm. 401-403. Dyson, Stephen Benedict and Thomas Preston. “Individual Characteristics of Political Leader and the Use of Analogy in Foreign Policy Decision Making”. Political Psychology. 27. (2006). hlm. 265-288. Friend, Theodore.“Sukarno: A Political Biography”.The American Historical Review. Vol. 81. No. 4 (Oct., 1976). hlm. 947-948. George, A. L. “The Operational Code: A Neglected Approach to the Study of Political Leaders and Decision-Making”. International Studies Quarterly.134. (1969). hlm. 190-222. Hilgard, Ernest R. “TheTrilogy of the Mind: Cognition, affection and conation”.Journal of The History of Behavioral Sciences. 16.(1980). hlm. 107-117. Hindley, Donald.“Indonesia’s Confrontation with Malaysia: A search for Motives”. Asian Survey. Vol.4, No.6 (Jun., 1964). hlm. 904-913. Holsti, Ole R. (1970). “The Operational Code of John Foster Dulle’s Phylosophical and Instrumental Beliefs”. Canadian Journal of Political Science. No.1 (Mar., 1970), h. 123-157. Hsieh, H.F., & Shannon, S.E. “Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis”. Qualitative Health Research. 15(9),(2005). hlm. 1277-1288. Leifer,Michael. “Confrontation: A Study in Indonesia Politics”. International Affairs. Vol. 42. No. 3 (Jul., 1966). hlm. 543-549. Leifer,Michel. “The Twenty Years of Indonesia Foreign Policy, 1945-1965”.International Affairs.Vol. 50. No. 3 (Jul., 1974). hlm. 497. Leifer,Michael. “Konfrontasi: The Indonesia-Malaysia Dispute”. International Affairs. Vol. 52, No. 1 (Jan., 1976). hlm. 139-140. Leifer,Michael. “Indonesian Foreign Policy and the Dilemma of Independence”. International Affairs. Vol. 53. No. 4. (Oct., 1977). hlm. 718-719. Legge,John P.“Sukarno and Struggle of Independence”. The Journal of Asian Studies. Vol. 30. No. 1 (Nov., 1970). hlm. 235-237. Legge,John D.“The Twenty Years of Indonesia Foreign Policy, 1945-1965”.Pacific Affairs. Vol. 47. No. 4 (Winter, 1974-1975). hlm. 576-578. Lev,Daniel S. Sukarno and Struggle of Independence. The Western Political Quarterly. Vol. 23. No. 2 (Jun., 1970). hlm. 423-425. Levy,Jack S. An Introduction to Prospect Theory. Political Psychology 13.(1992). 171-86. Loan,Stephen. “Sukarno: A Political Biography”.The Journal of Asian Studies. Vol. 32. No. 4 (Aug., 1973). hlm. 749-750. McCloud,Donald G.“Indonesian Foreign Policy and the Dilemma of Independence”.The American Political Science Review. Vol. 72. No. 3 (Sep., 1978). hlm. 1188-1189. McLelland, David. “The Operational Code of Dean Achesson’s Phylosophical and Instrumental Beliefs”. Canadian Journal of Political Science. No.1 (Mar., 1971). hlm. 52-75. Means,Gordon P.“Indonesian Foreign Policy and the Dilemma of Independence”.Canadian Journalof Political Science. Vol. 12. No. 1. (Mar., 1979). hlm. 201-202. Paget, Roger K.“Sukarno and Struggle of Independence”. Pacific Affairs. Vo. 45. No. 2 (Summer, 1972). hlm. 313-314. Palmer, Leslie H. “Sukarno: the Nationalist”. Pacific Affairs. Vol. 30, No.2 (Jun., 1957). h. 101-119. Ricklefs,M. C.Sukarno and Struggle of Independence”. Modern Asian Studies. Vol. 5. No. 1. (1970). hlm. 79-80. Simon,Sheldon W. “Indonesia’s Foreign Policy”. Pacific Affairs, Vol. 57. No. 1. (Spring, 1984). hlm. 171-17. Taylor,Robert H. “Indonesia’s Foreign Policy”. International Affairs, Vol. 59. No. 4. (Autumn, 1983). hlm. 721-722. van der Kroef , Justus M. Indonesias Economic Difficulties. International Journal. vol. xvii, part 4, (1962). hlm.399. van Der Veur,Paul W. “Indonesian Foreign Policy and the Dilemma of Independence”.The Western Political Quarterly. Vol. 33. No. 3. (Sep., 1980). hlm. 440-441. Weatherbee, Donald E. Indonesia and Malaysia; Confrontation in Southeast Asia, Orbis, Summer 1962. hlm. 336-351. Willner,Ann Ruth.“Sukarno and Struggle of Independence”. The American Political Science Review. Vol. 65. No. 2 (Jun., 1971). hlm. 540-541. AKHBAR dan MAJALAH Harian Abadi. 3 November 1959. Harian Abadi. 5 November 1959. Harian Abadi. 9 November 1959. Harian Abadi. 18 Ogos 1960. Harian Abadi. 20 Ogos 1960. Harian Abadi. 23 Ogos 1960. Harian Abadi. 26 Ogos 1960. Harian Abadi. 29 Ogos 1960. Harian Abadi. 30 Ogos 1960. Harian Abadi. 7 September 1960. Harian Abadi. 17 September 1960. Harian Rakyat. 16 Mac 1961. Harian Rakyat. 22 Mac 1961. Harian Rakyat. 9 Mei 1961. Harian Rakyat. 11 Oktober 1960. Kantor Berita Antara. 22 November 1961. Kantor Berita Antara. 24 Ogos 1962. Kantor Berita Antara. 27 September 1962. Kantor Berita Antara. 27 Disember 1962. Majalah Minggu Pagi. 4 April 1965. No. 1 Tahun ke XVIII. Majalah Minggu Pagi. 2 Mei 1965. No.5 Tahun ke XVIII. Majalah Kiblat No. 16 ke XIII. 30 Januari 1967. Majalah Kiblat No. 20 ke XIII. Mac ke II 1967. Majalah Kiblat No. 22 ke XIII. April ke II 1967. WEBSITE Erman Rajagukguk. “Percakapan dengan Daniel S. Lev”www.ermanhukum.com/MakalahERpdf/Percakapan Dengan Daniel S.pdf. Marying, P. (2000). Qualitative Content Analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1 (2).www.qualitativeresearch.net/fqs-texte/2-00/2-00Marying-e. html. Taylor, Ellen., Powell Marcus Renner. (2003). Analyzing Qualitative Data. http://learningstore.uwex.edu/pdf/g3658_12.pdf. Zhang, Yan., and Barbara M. Wildemuth. (2009). Qualitative Analysis of Content. http://ils.unc.edu/--yanz/Content_analysis.pdf.

Pemikiran Sukarno di sebalik konfrontasi Indonesia 1959-1965: Suatu tinjauan psikologi politik

相似书籍