Kesan strategi pengajaran timbal balik terhadap kemahiran membaca, minat dan keseronokan membaca

Tujuan kajian ini adalah untuk mengkaji kesan penggunaan Strategi Pengajaran TimbalBalik (SPTB) terhadap kemahiran membaca, kemajuan kemahiran membaca, minat dan keseronokan membaca murid dalam mata pelajaran Bahasa Cina. Kajian ini menggunakan rekabentuk eksperimen kuasi. Subjek kajian terdiri dari...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Ooi, Li Jie
Format:	thesis
Language:	zsm
Published:	2020
Subjects:
Online Access:	https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6731
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:6731
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
collection	UPSI Digital Repository
language	zsm
topic
spellingShingle	Ooi, Li Jie Kesan strategi pengajaran timbal balik terhadap kemahiran membaca, minat dan keseronokan membaca
description	Tujuan kajian ini adalah untuk mengkaji kesan penggunaan Strategi Pengajaran TimbalBalik (SPTB) terhadap kemahiran membaca, kemajuan kemahiran membaca, minat dan keseronokan membaca murid dalam mata pelajaran Bahasa Cina. Kajian ini menggunakan rekabentuk eksperimen kuasi. Subjek kajian terdiri daripada murid- murid Sekolah JenisKebangsaan Cina (SJKC) di daerah Kinta Utara, negeri Perak. Seramai 63 orang murid Tahun Limadilibatkan. Kelas rawatan dan kawalan ditentukan secara rawak. Sebanyak 35 orang murid dalamkumpulan rawatan diajar menggunakan SPTB dan 28 orang murid dalam kumpulan kawalan diajarmenggunakan teknik konvensional. Data kuantitatif tentang kemahiran membaca dikutip melalui ujianpra, ujian pertengahan 1 dan 2, ujian pos dan data tentang minat dan keseronokan membaca dikutipmelalui soal selidik. Data kualitatif juga dikutip untuk menyokong data-data kuantitatif melaluitemu bual. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan bahawa terdapat perbezaan yang signifikan dalam kemahiranmembaca antara kumpulan rawatan (M=58.06, SP=16.37) dan kumpulan kawalan (M=48.18, SP=19.62)dalam ujian pos, t(61)=3.13, p0.05 dalam ujian pertengahan 1.Walaubagaimanapun terdapat perbezaan kemahiran membaca yang signifikan dalam ujian pertengahan2 antara kumpulan rawatan (M=52.83, SP=16.25) dan kumpulan kawalan (M=42.82, SP=16.04), t(61)=2.44,p
format	thesis
qualification_name
qualification_level	Master's degree
author	Ooi, Li Jie
author_facet	Ooi, Li Jie
author_sort	Ooi, Li Jie
title	Kesan strategi pengajaran timbal balik terhadap kemahiran membaca, minat dan keseronokan membaca
title_short	Kesan strategi pengajaran timbal balik terhadap kemahiran membaca, minat dan keseronokan membaca
title_full	Kesan strategi pengajaran timbal balik terhadap kemahiran membaca, minat dan keseronokan membaca
title_fullStr	Kesan strategi pengajaran timbal balik terhadap kemahiran membaca, minat dan keseronokan membaca
title_full_unstemmed	Kesan strategi pengajaran timbal balik terhadap kemahiran membaca, minat dan keseronokan membaca
title_sort	kesan strategi pengajaran timbal balik terhadap kemahiran membaca, minat dan keseronokan membaca
granting_institution	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
granting_department	Fakulti Pembangunan Manusia
publishDate	2020
url	https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6731
_version_	1747833299913408512
spelling	oai:ir.upsi.edu.my:67312022-02-15 Kesan strategi pengajaran timbal balik terhadap kemahiran membaca, minat dan keseronokan membaca 2020 Ooi, Li Jie Tujuan kajian ini adalah untuk mengkaji kesan penggunaan Strategi Pengajaran TimbalBalik (SPTB) terhadap kemahiran membaca, kemajuan kemahiran membaca, minat dan keseronokan membaca murid dalam mata pelajaran Bahasa Cina. Kajian ini menggunakan rekabentuk eksperimen kuasi. Subjek kajian terdiri daripada murid- murid Sekolah JenisKebangsaan Cina (SJKC) di daerah Kinta Utara, negeri Perak. Seramai 63 orang murid Tahun Limadilibatkan. Kelas rawatan dan kawalan ditentukan secara rawak. Sebanyak 35 orang murid dalamkumpulan rawatan diajar menggunakan SPTB dan 28 orang murid dalam kumpulan kawalan diajarmenggunakan teknik konvensional. Data kuantitatif tentang kemahiran membaca dikutip melalui ujianpra, ujian pertengahan 1 dan 2, ujian pos dan data tentang minat dan keseronokan membaca dikutipmelalui soal selidik. Data kualitatif juga dikutip untuk menyokong data-data kuantitatif melaluitemu bual. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan bahawa terdapat perbezaan yang signifikan dalam kemahiranmembaca antara kumpulan rawatan (M=58.06, SP=16.37) dan kumpulan kawalan (M=48.18, SP=19.62)dalam ujian pos, t(61)=3.13, p0.05 dalam ujian pertengahan 1.Walaubagaimanapun terdapat perbezaan kemahiran membaca yang signifikan dalam ujian pertengahan2 antara kumpulan rawatan (M=52.83, SP=16.25) dan kumpulan kawalan (M=42.82, SP=16.04), t(61)=2.44,p 2020 thesis https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6731 https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=6731 text zsm closedAccess Masters Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris Fakulti Pembangunan Manusia A. Rashid, N., Boon P.Y. & Syed Ahmad, S.F. (2017). Murid dan Pembelajaran.Kuala Lumpr: Penerbit Fajar Bakti.Abdul Rahman, A., Jamali, H.N., Ku Azizan, K.F. & Bahari, N.S. (2014). Pengajaran dan PembelajaranKemahiran Membaca Bahasa Arab di KUIS. Dicapai pada Februari 20, 2019, dari https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303371854_Pengajaran_dan_Pembelajaran_Kemahiran_Memba ca_Bahasa_Arab_di_KUISAbdul Rahman, N. (2017, Oktober 15). Pembelajaran Abad Ke-21 di semua sekolah.Berita Harian, diperoleh darihttps://www.bharian.com.my/berita/pendidikan/2017/10/337703/pembelajaran-abad-ke-21-di-semua-sekolah.Abeyrathna, P. H. A. S. (2004). A study on leisure reading habits and interests among secondaryschool students in Sri Lanka. Dissertation (M.L.I.S.), Fakulti Sains Komputer dan TeknologiMaklumat, Universiti Malaya.Abu Hassan, Z., Schattner, P. & Mazza, D. (2006). Doing A Pilot Study: Why Is it Essential?. MalaysFam Physiciam, 1(2-3), 70-73.AD-Heisat, M. A. A., Mohammed, S., Krishnasamy, K. A., & Issa, J. (2009). (2009). The Use ofReading Strategies in Developing Students Reading Competency among Primary School Teachers inMalaysia. European Journal of Social Sciences 2(12), 310-319.Ahmadi, M. R., Gilakjani, A. P. (2012). Reciprocal teaching strategies and their impactson English reading comprehension. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(10), 2053.Akhtar, I. (2016). Research Design. In Research in Social Science: Interdisciplinary Perspectives.(1), 17.Alfassi, M. (1998). Reading for Meaning: The Efficacy of Reciprocal Teaching inFostering Reading Comprehension in High School Students in Remedial Reading Classes. Dicapai pada Januari 12, 2019 darihttp://www.jstor.org/stable/1163426.Andreas Schleicher(2019), PISA 2018 Insights and Interpretation, OECD Publishing, Paris.Arbas, P.G. & Narjes, B.S. (2016). How can students improve their readingcomprehension skill? Journal of Studies in Education, 6(2), 229-240.Aronson, E., Patnoe, S. (2011). Cooperation in the classroom: The jigsaw method, 3rd Edition.London: Pinter & Martin LtdBahagian Pembangunan Kementerian, (2011). Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Rendah (KSSR) - PrinsipKSSR. Dicapai pada Januari 10, 2019, diperoleh darihttp://www.moe.gov.my/bpk/v2/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=311&Itemid=477&Lang=en&limitstart=2Baharom Mohamad (2012, Februari 22). Menguasai kemahiran membaca secara berkesan. UtusanBorneo, B3-B4.Chua, Y.P. (2011). Kaedah penyelidikan buku 1. Malaysia: McGraw-Hill Sdn. Bhd. Clark, C. & Zoysa,D.S. (2011). Mapping the interrelationships of reading enjoyment,attitudes, behavior and attainment. UK: National Literacy Trust.Clark, C., Rumbold, K., (2006). Reading for pleasure: a research overview. UK: NationalLiteracy Trust.Clark, C., Torsi, S. & Strong, J. (2005). A school study conducted by the National Literacy trustfor the Reading Champions Initiative. UK:National Literacy Trust.Cohen, E. G. & Lotan, R. A. (2014). Designing Groupwork: Strategies for theHeterogeneous Classroom Third Edition. Teachers College Press.Cole, M. & Cole, S. (2001) The Development of Children. 4th Ed. New York: ScientificAmerican Books.W.N. Freeman and Company.Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative andQualitative Research. Educational Research (4?? ed). Boston, MA: Pearson.Dabarera, C., Renandya, W. A., & Zhang, L. J. (2014). The impact of metacognitive scaffolding andmonitoring on reading comprehension. System, 42, 462-473.Dennis, D. V. (2008). Are Assessment Data Really Driving Middle School Reading Instruction? Whatwe can learn from one students experience. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 51,578-587.Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. (2005). Kamus Dewan (Edisi keempat.). Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa danPustaka.DiLorenzo, K. E. (2010). The effects of reciprocal teaching on the science literacy of intermediateelementary students in inclusive science classes. Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton.Doolittle, P.E., Hicks,D.,Triplett,C.F.&Nichols,W.D.(2006). Reciprocal Teaching For ReadingComprehension in Higher Education: A Strategy for Fostering the Deeper Understanding of of Texts.International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 17(2),106-118.Euis Juliawati, Sudarsono Sudarsono, Eni Rosnija (2019). The Use Of Reciprocal TeachingpTechnique To Improve Students Reading Comprehension To Recount Text. Jurnal Pendidikandan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa, 8(6), diperoleh darihttp://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/jpdpb/article/view/33309Fadzilah, A. H. (2017). Pelaksanaan Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran Koperatif Berasaskan AbadKe-21: Satu Tinjauan Di Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Pekan Nenas. Dicapai pada Februari 1, 2019, diperoleh dari http://eprints.uthm.edu.my.Fajrina, S.A. (2018). Cooperative Integrated Reading Composition to Improve Pupils ReadingComprehension Achievement, Motivation and Interest (Tesis Sarjana yang tidak diterbit). UniversitiPendidikan Sultan Idris.Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2000). How to design and evaluate research ineducation. Boston: McGraw-Hill.Giam, L.H. (2015). Tahap Konsep Kendiri Membaca Pelajar Tingkatan Empat Yang Mengikuti ProgramNilam. (Tesis Sarjana yang tidak diterbit). Universiti PendidikanSultan Idris.Gillies, R.M. (2016). Cooperative Learning: Review of Research and Practice.Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 39-54.Gomaa, O. M. K. (2015). The Effect of Reciprocal Technique Intervention Strategy on ReadingComprehension Skills of 5th Grade Elementary School Students with Reading Disabilities.International Journal of PsychoEducational Sciences, 4(2), 39-45.Gottman, J. M., McFall, R. M., & Barnett, J. T. (1969). Design and analysis of research using timeseries. Psychological Bulletin, 72(4), 299306. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0028021Harmer, J. (2007). How to teach English. Harlow: Pearson.Harvey, S., & Goudvis, A. (2007). Strategies that work: Teaching comprehension for understandingand engagement. Portland, Me: Stenhouse Publishers.Hodi, A. (2018). Testing the model of reading literacy:Examining the cognitive and non-cognitivefactors influencing students reading achievement in different text formats in grade 2. (TesisKedoktoran yang tidak diterbitkan). University of Szeged.Huang, X.C. (2018). Kemahiran membaca secara kendiri dalam murid sekolah rendah: Keadaan danStrategi. China Academic Journal Electronic Publishing House 31(1), 6-7.Jamila, K.A.M.K., Mohd Hanafi, M.Y., & Rosadah, A.M. (2012) Pelaksanaan pengajarankemahiran membaca dan menulis dalam bahasa melayu bagi murid prasekolah bermasalah pendengaran.Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu; Malay Language Education (MyLEJ), 2 (1). pp. 111-127.Johnson, D., Johnson, R., Stanne, M., & Garibaldi, A. (1990). Impact of groupprocessing on achievement in cooperative groups. Journal of Social Psychology, 130,507-516.Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, F. (2009). Joining to-gether: Group theory and group skills (10th ed.).Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (2002). Learning together and alone: Overview and meta?analysis.Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 22(1), 95-105.Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., & Smith, K.A. (2014). Cooperative learning:Improving university instruction by basing practice on validated theory. Journal onExcellence in College Teaching, 25(3&4), 85-118.Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia (KPM) (2012). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025: Laporan Awal - Ringkasan Eksekutif. Putrajaya: Kementerian PelajaranMalaysia (KPM).Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (2017). Laporan Tahunan 2016: PelanPembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (KPM) (2014). Dokumen Standard Kurikulum Dan Pentaksiran BahasaCina Tahun 5. Kuala Lumpur: Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum.Komariah, E., Ramadhona, P. A. R., & Silviyanti, T. M. (2015). Improving reading comprehensionthrough Reciprocal Teaching Method. Studies in English Language and Education, 2(2), 88-104.Kozulin, A. (1986). Thought and language: Lev Vygotsky newly revised and edited.Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Kuslan, N.L. (2014). Aktiviti Pemulihan Bacaan di Sebuah Sekolah Rendah:Satu Kajian Kes.Tesis Ijazah Doktor Falsafah (Pendidikan). Universiti MalayaLantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and second languagelearning. In B. Van Patten & J. Williams (Eds.), Explaining second language acquisition (pp.197-221). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Lederer, J. M. (2000). Reciprocal Teaching of Social Studies in Inclusive Elementary Classrooms.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(1), 91106.Lubliner, S. (2002). The power of clarifying: A comparative analysis of strategies that strengthencomprehension. Hayward, CA: California State University Hayward.Mahzan, A. & Wu, H.C. (2009). Vygotskys socio-cultural theory of literacy Scaffoldingchildren to read and write at an early age. Dicapai pada Februari 2, 2019, dari https://www.researchgate.net /publication/279279381_Vygotsky's_sociocultural_theory_of_literacy_Scaffolding_children_to_read_and_write_at_an_early_age.Mat, A. W. (1995). Hubungan Minat Membaca di Kalangan Pelajar-Pelajar SMKA di Seberang perai denganLatar Belakang Keluarga dan Persekitaran. Dicapai pada Februari 2, 2019, darihttp://etd.uum.edu.my/582/2/ABD_WAHAB_MAT_1995.pdfMayo, J.A. (2013). Socially Constructed Knowledge: Using Cooperative Learning in AssessmentInstruction, Pedagogy and Human Sciences 3(1), 52-64.Meyer, K. (2010). Diving into reading: revisiting reciprocal teaching in the middle years.Literacy Learning: the Middle Years, 18(1), 4152.Mc Brien, J.L. & Brandt, R.S. (1997). The language of learning: A guide to education terms. Alexandria VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.McAllum, R. (2014). Reciprocal Teaching: Critical Reflection on Practice.Kairaranga 15(1), 26-35.McDevitt, T.M. & Ormrod, J.E. (2002). Child Development and Education. Upper SaddleRiver, NJ:Merrill Prentice Hall.McLaughlin, M., & Allen, M.B. (2002). Guided Comprehension: A teaching model for grades 38.Newark, DE: International Reading Association.McNamara, D. S., Ozuru, Y., Best, R., & O'Reilly, T. (2007). Reading comprehension strategies:Theories, interventions, and technologies. Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesPublishers.Md. Akhir, Z.H., Dali, M.H. & Saidin, K. (2017). Faktor yang mempengaruhi peanan pengetua dalammeningkatkan amalan membaca menerusi program NILAM. Journal of Advanced Research in Social andBehavioral Sciences, 7(1), 42-58.Mikeladze, T. (2014). Extensive Reading. Dicapai pada Februari 14, 2019 darihttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/280878633_Extensive_Reading.Millis, B. J. (2002, October). Enhancing learningand more!through cooperative learning.Manhattan, KS: The IDEA Center.Mohamed Noh, M.M., Basir, S.A., Taib, L., Ahmadun, M. & Wan Husin, W.N. (2015). Kajian Kes Perlaksanaan Etika Kerja Islam (EKI) di Johor Corporation (JCorp): Tumpuan kepada Perlaksanaan dan Faedahnya. Dicapai pada Februari 14, 2019 darihttp://ejournal.ukm.my/pengurusan/issue/view/749.Muhammad, A., Jasmi, K. A., Mustari, M. I., Nasbon, R. & Awang, N. F. (2012). Kemahiran Membacadalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab. Dicapai pada Januari 18, 2019, darihttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/293097568_Kemahiran_Membaca_dalam_Pengajaran_dan_Pembelajaran_Bahasa_Arab.Muhammad, A., Jasmi, K. A., Mustari, M. I., Nasbon, R., Awang, N. F. (2012). Kemahiran Membacadalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab. Seminar Antarabangsa Perguruan dan Pendidikan Islam[SEAPPI2012] (International Seminar on Teacher and Islamic Education [SEAPPI2012]), 901-910. JohorBahru, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.National Center for Education Statistics (2007). The nations report card on reading 2007 NationalReport for England. Slough: NFER.. Dicapai pada Januari 10, 2019, darihttp://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pdf/main2007/2007496.pdf.Noortyani, R. (2018). An Exploratory Study on Students Reading Interest Development throughIndependent Reading-Retelling Activity. Arab World English Journal, 9 (2). 108-117.https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol9no2.7Oczkus, L. D. (2010). Reciprocal teaching at work: Powerful strategies and lessons for improvingreading comprehension. International Reading Association.OECD (2002) Reading for change: performance and engagement across countries: Results from PISA2002. New York: Organisation for Economic co-operation and Development.OECD (2010) Education at a Glance 2010: OECD Indicators. New York: Organisationfor Economic co-operation and Development.OECD (2013), PISA 2012 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Mathematics, Reading, Science,Problem Solving and Financial Literacy, OECD Publishing.OECD (2019), PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris,Oraib, A.R. (2017). The Impact of Reciprocal Teaching Strategies on the Learnerss ReadingComprehension, Strategy Use and Attitudes. (Tesis Sarjana yang tidak diterbitkan). BierzeirUniversity.Palincsar, A. (2013). Reciprocal Teaching. In E. Anderman & J. Hattie (Eds.),International Guide to Student Achievement (pp. 369-371).Palincsar, A., & Brown, A. (1984). Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering andComprehension-Monitoring Activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117-175.Pardede, P. (2008). A review of reading theories and its implication to the teaching of reading. Dicapai dari https://parlindunganpardede.wordpress.com/articles/language-teaching/a-review-on-reading-theories-and-its-implication-to-the-teaching-of-reading/Peter E.D., David, Cheri, William&Carl (2006). Reciprocal Teaching For ReadingComprehension in Higher Education: A Strategy for Fostering the Deeper Understanding of ofTexts. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 17(2),106-118.Perpustakaan Negara Malaysia. 2007. Profil membaca rakyat Malaysia 2005. Kuala Lumpur :Perpustakaan Negara Malaysia.Pressley, M. (2002). Metacognition and self-regulated comprehension. What research has to say aboutreading instruction, 3, 291-309.Renninger, K.A., & Bachrach, J.E. (2015). Studying triggers for interest and engagementusing observational methods. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 5869.Reynolds, R., Arnone, M., & Marshall, T. (2009). Perceived compe-tence and reading enjoyment as contributors to information skills and digital technology knowledge. Proceedings of theAmerican Society for Information Science and Technology, 46(1), 1-26.http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/meet.2009.1450460235Rodli, M. & Prastyo, H. (2017). Applying Reciprocal Teaching Method in Teaching Reading. Studies inLinguistics and Literature 1(2), 112-122.Roe, B.D., Smith, S.H. & Kolodziej, N.J. (2019). Teaching Reading in todays ElementarySchools. Boston: Cengage Learning.Sahab, R.M. (2014). The Use of Reciprocal Teaching Procedure in Teaching Narrative Texts to ImproveStudents Reading Comprehension. Journal of English and Education, 2(2), 81-90.Sainsbury, M. and Clarkson, R. (2008). Attitudes to Reading at Ages Nine and Eleven: Full Report.Slough: NFER.Sanford, K.L. (2015). Factors that Affect the Reading Comprehension of Secondary Students with Disabilities (Tesis Kedoktoran yang tidak diterbit). The University of San Francisco.Shahril, I & Tan, S.S. (2016). Penggunaan Artifak Dalam Zon Perkembangan Proksimal Semasa Proses Menstruktur Ayat Bahasa Sepanyol. Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran AsiaPasifik, 4(1), 14-29.Sharbati, H. (2017). The Effect of Reciprocal Teaching on Iranian Pre-intermediate EFL LearnersReading Comprehension. International Journal of Modern Language Teaching and Learning, 2(1),41-53.Shen Q.Y. (2013). Use of Blog to Improve English Writing in the Chinese Tertiary EFL Classroom.English Language Teaching, 6(10), 51-56.Slavin, R.E. (1980). Cooperative learning. Review of Educational Research, 50(2), 315-342.Springer, S.E., Harris,S., & Dole, J.A. (2017). From Surviving to Thriving: FourResearch-Based Principles to Build Students Reading Interest. The Reading Teacher, 7(1), 43-50.http://doi:10.1002 /trtr.1581Soonthornmanee, R. (2002). The Effect of the Reciprocal Teaching Approach On the ReadingComprehension of Efl Students. RELC Journal, 33(2), 125141.Sousan, S. & Hadi, S. (2014) The Role of Teaching Reading Strategies in Enhancing ReadingComprehension. International Journal of Current Life Sciences 4 (11), 10922-10928.Stricklin, K. (2011). Hands on reciprocal teaching: A comprehension technique. The Reading Teacher,64(8), 620-625.Tiew, W.S. (2010). Tabiat dan Minat Membaca di kalangan Pelajar Tingkatan Empat di SMK Hulu Kelang,Gombak, Selangor pada Tahun 2010. Jurnal PPM (4), 57-75.Twist, L., Sainsbury, M., Woodthorpe, A. and Whetton, C. (2003). Reading all over the world.Ullah, M.M. & Fatema, S. (2013). Why Some Students are Less Motivated in Reading Classes atTertiary Level in Bangladesh. English Language Teaching 6(5), 129-140.Umi Kalthom, M. & Ahmad, E. (2015). Cooperative Learning as an alternative Approach toLanguage Learning in 21?? Century: Research review. Dicapai pada Februari 2, 2019, darihttp://eprints.uthm.edu.my.United States Department of Education (2005). Helping your child become a reader.Washington, DC: ED Pubs.Verenikina, I.M. (2010). Vygotsky in Twenty-First-Century research. Dicapai padaFebruari 10, 2019, dari https://ro.uow.edu.au.Westera, J. (2002). Reciprocal teaching as a schoolwide inclusive strategy. (TesisKedoktoran yang tidak diterbit), University of Auckland, Auckland.Windawati, M. P. (2015). The use of reciprocal teaching technique to improve studentsreading comprehension in teaching analytical exposition text. (Tesis Sarjana yang tidak diterbit).Walisongo State Islamic University.Yusnani (2018). Theoretical Perspectives on Cooperative Learning. Dicapai pada Februari 4,2019, dari https://knepublishing.com.Zakaria, N.Z. (2015). Kesan Pendekatan Konstruktivisme Dan Pendekatan Tradisional Dalam PengajaranDan Pembelajaran Komponen Sastera Bahasa Melayu.Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu, 5(2), 12-21.

Kesan strategi pengajaran timbal balik terhadap kemahiran membaca, minat dan keseronokan membaca

Similar Items